"Patton The Tank" Tank Review in World of Tanks

[@linvictus9403]

It was the worst in Tier 10, now it changes, to the worst in Tier 9🎉

[@Bence3]

Well they won't give any op tank for free, especially not a tier 9

[@michaelcheng4985]

It's free! what do you expect?

[@HungarianDerrickRose]

You can alway sell it for some silver - at least that's what I am gonna do I think.

[@StevenFireWalker]

@@HungarianDerrickRoseit sells for at most 20k credits

[@HungarianDerrickRose]

@@StevenFireWalker No effin way. It's a Tier9, will sell for cca. 2 millions.

[@liambanning3674]

“You’ll be running out of ammo later on in the game” Me: “Haha, silly QB. I get sent back to the garage after 5 shots :D”

[@oliverreedslovechild]

🤣🤣🤣🤣"after 5 shots " pfft, amateur. recently I've had a run of getiing RTGd after 0 shots!

[@njebei]

Tanks with huge cupolas like the patton should have the best view ranges in the game and not just a tiny 10m difference. Adjust the other stats if you need to but you can't play a tank like the Patton at close ranges. It needs the view range to compensate (or maybe a lot more armor on the cupola). It's things like this that make WoTs so silly.

[@Tapout121]

I agree if you're going to sacrifice the armor when peeking a ridge you might as well get something for it and view range makes sense.

[@SanderDoesThings]

It works in real life because no one shoots for weak points, And you can't keep shooting the same dead commander

[@andiadmiral8128]

Yeah i thinking the same too. because the cupola size is big and easily to penetrated at least make viewrange better

[@ADxG1369]

Well - giving this tank to new players - guaranteed to have them stop playing by end of weekend. Nice one WG.

[@Berzilla]

got that right ,seems to me some more russian bias ,that M48 was really good then they shut it down with a nerf ,paper thin armor and a tumor the size of the moon on top of it anyone remember that 59 patton disaster we got now this patton we are getting cant last a whole game

[@DisgruntledDoomer]

Guaranteed? We should be so lucky... The matches are absolutely _terrible_ with all the tourists around.

[@Neptunesplayground0]

This thing needs 6 pieces of equipment just to be viable.

[@stanyduh5427]

no

[@DjFresh4lteFolie]

yes

[@primalant]

if this is the real stats to balance we need some turret armour

[@mothboy5]

No amount of equipment would make this viable 😭

[@warkus123]

That brings up an interesting point though... A tank that's intentionally statistically bad but has more slots for equipment to compensate would be quite cool. WG already showed they can do less than 3 with low tiers, so what's stopping them from making one with 5-6slots?

[@Brescaz]

ty WG for this 7.5 tier tank (at tier 9). Really nice.

[@Adam-hy1du]

You’re right they should just give every player a bz176

[@thesandwich7151]

at least it wasn't yet another tier 2 - 4 gift tank

[@QuickFistBoxing1]

@@Adam-hy1duwhat? Whats the point of giving away tank which is just unplayable? No one wants that and im not also saying that we should get op tanks for free at least be decent and not absolutely trash can

[@thesandwich7151]

@@QuickFistBoxing1 10 years ago this would have been considered pretty good, crazy how powerful tanks have gotten.

[@Adam-hy1du]

@@QuickFistBoxing1 it’s sarcasm the dude is complaining about getting a free tank that wg never had to give out to anyone I don’t really care if it’s a bad tank it’s still a nice thing to do yet everyone finds a way to complain

[@jerrydiener6380]

I see this as an overall win, since playing against this tank will be enjoyable

[@Definitelynotcrystal-t2q]

Lmao

[@azuresflames2473]

Especially since the only people who would play this are people who dont know better and think "ooh I get to experience end game tanks" while their top tier tech tree tank is a kv1

[@dennisw64]

"God forbid, three mark this tank..." That line made me snicker. Maybe WG is trying to find out, who is a masochist amongst it's player base...

[@TheMystikal82]

Skill will, but there will be a lot of swearing 😂.

[@barbonson_richards]

It wont be hard, expectation values will be extremely low with so many shit players playing it

[@jimis2223]

It won’t be hard for him or any player close to his level since everyone will get the tank play a few battles , drop the expected values very low and sell it.

[@leosalonen1564]

@@jimis2223 sell it for 1000 credits?

[@wotdragonracer5624]

It’s actually really easy since most of the players that seriously play with it are newbies or noobs with 45% wr. I’m at 72 percent with only 49 battles, and I actually enjoy the tank. Overall, people hate on it too much and imo it’s actually a satisfying tank to play as you have to master it’s strengths and play around it’s weaknesses

[@louisongermain-rb7gl]

Free means extremely bad for wg

[@KolonelKrummps-uz9ei]

Sahariano:

[@lw4384]

BT7 Art before the HE nerf was a ton of fun

[@louisongermain-rb7gl]

@@lw4384 There's some exeptions

[@domin727]

All very low tier exceptions, because no one plays low tiers a lot...​@@louisongermain-rb7gl

[@louisongermain-rb7gl]

@@domin727 and only people who play it are seal clubers vs new player so yeah its fun

[@rohanbrown6647]

I’m quite excited to hop in my tiger maus and shred these things

[@Robert-vk7je]

Noone will play it more than once.

[@rohanbrown6647]

@@Robert-vk7je not the potato’s who don’t understand it’s a bad tank

[@ZafrasF]

@@rohanbrown6647 After they get several 0 damage games they will move back to the lower tier tanks.

[@marekmecir5822]

Still Im going to try to make it work...mardasCZ@@rohanbrown6647

[@andiadmiral8128]

Nah the lowerplate is weak, slow and easily to get flank by tier viii or xi meds. Basically a mauschen meet e-75. My obj 777 ii or ae phase i heat round gonna tear it's lowerplate

[@MaxFiveGames]

I think Gun Rammer has to go for Vertical Stabilizers. There is nothing more frustrating than aiming a shot for years and then missing it, just cuz you had to rush your shot. And then to reload AGAIN. I rather reload a second longer and then hit my shots.

[@neeevirus]

It's like the mentality with derpy guns or low dpm tanks If youre gonna reload for so long anyway, then just make sure each shot counts more often I setup my t-34-3 this way, because having a gun rammer instead of another equipment that improves gun handling just makes the tank unbearable

[@aristaeus2514]

Gun rammer is overrated

[@MaxFiveGames]

@@neeevirus Yea I do get what you are saying. But the tank is so damn bad at everything that something has to give. If you remove Turbo basically all the mediums and heavys get to position faster than you. If you remove Stabilizer you miss almost ''half'' your shots and you cant really hit weakspots. If you remove optics every tank at tier 9 has better view range than you. If remove vents tank is just a little bit worse all round. I think out of all of them losing some DPM is the least of evils. In my eyes of course. Cuz only 50% or less fights I have are full out DPM wars. At least how I try to play. So for me Vents, Stabilizer and Turbo will be the setup I think.

[@Sky-fk5tl]

Just swap vents

[@kaaapo8703]

@@Sky-fk5tl but then you lose the viewrange that you need with 380 base...

[@disabor]

It's actually a gift to people who play against it

[@hoheeplays7819]

I’m trying not to sound ungrateful as it is a free tank but after playing for 6 years and spending a decent amount on the game this tank is a shocking Christmas present

[@LeonidasRex1]

For a 12 year player (me), this fairly insulting to be honest.

[@andiadmiral8128]

Nah im pretty grateful even i have a few of premium tier xi from the battlepass mission. I mean they make this tank stats suck at least to balancing purpose because not all player gonna enjoy using this tank only the player that know how this game works especially for this tanks

[@pwnnr13]

It's WG. Anything free won't be enjoyable and or worth selling even.

[@prtup5318]

WG doesn't give a shit about the normal tankers time and compassion for this game. Have spent 7 yrs and can loudly say that this game is shit.

[@animalyze7120]

Yeah shocking they thought to insult our intelligence by giving us free crap on a stick in pretty wrapper.

[@juanzulu1318]

If WG intentionally creates underpowered tanks like "Patton the Tank" it is only logical that overpowered tanks like the BZ176 etc are also created intentionally. Balancing is obviously no priority. Now we know it for sure.

[@Definitelynotcrystal-t2q]

Wg knows damn well what there doing when they make op tanks

[@Zebsy]

Players: "This Obsidian tank was easy enough to get, but it's a bad tank" Wargaming: "Hold my beer"

[@robinkhn2547]

Actually, the Obsidian isn't that. Thought it was horrendous at first, but when I played it to do some missions, I realized it is somewhat formidable, at least in a good matchup, since the armor quite good, especially if you angle the tank. You'll be surprised how many ricochets you'll get. Sure, the Obsidian is not a strong tank, but it is usable at least in a good matchup and in some scenarios, while Patton the Tank just sucks in any kind of matchup pr scenario.

[@HotTaiCurry]

Oh I think the obsidian is ridiculous. 3k dpm with a bounty rammer and offsetting the terrible speed with a turbo and grousers, the tank gets me consistent 2.5k dmg games. Add to that a small profile (ie good camo), strong side armor for angling and side scraping, and high fire rate for perma tracking, and the obsidian is probably the best brawling medium in the game at tier 8.

[@taiga9675]

Obsidian was never bad, if you somehow can't perform with it, it's a skissue

[@mjtheko]

I recently got 3 of my friends to play this game over the last month. (with 2 of them, we're at level 4 in the referral system, they've just got to tier 7.) This will be their first t9 tank. the Matilda, LEFH and Pz. s39 have already made one of them quit this game for good. I DON'T want this tank to be my other 2 friend's first experience at tier 9, but it's going to be. Wargaming this is how you alienate your player base. Don't give away terrible tanks. I'd rather not have a "gift" at all than this spit in the face that will make my friends hate this game.

[@vladdracul2379]

Exactly! This tank has zero decent stats, let alone a single thing that it is good at. You literally can't play this tank and get a good feel for it.

[@REgamesplayer]

If they quit so easily, they probably did not liked base game enough to begin with.

[@vladdracul2379]

@@REgamesplayer It says something that the only people playing this game are the people that have been playing it since it started over 10 years ago. No one i try can get into this game no matter how hard i try

[@REgamesplayer]

@@vladdracul2379 That is because it is a niche thing even in gaming. You have to like a very particular style of gameplay and tanks in general in order to keep on playing.

[@vladdracul2379]

@@REgamesplayer Not really. It's the gameplay that puts most people off. Heck, I've been playing for over 10 years and even I can't stand entire parts of the gameplay. For one, the RNG accuracy is so annoying and it's a terrible mechanic. You can line up perfect shots on the flat side of a Maus and miss. Then some KV can snap show the top of your turret while moving and rotating. I'm sorry, but frick you on that one. The spotting and camo. The fact that you can have tanks literally sitting in the middle of a field with no brush and not get spotted is BS. You should be visible until you enter cover and then be unspotted. It's BS that tanks can shoot you behind cover and move back behind cover before the game graces you spotting them. The damaging parts of the tanks. I'm sorry, but shooting those useless hatches and gun ports continuously on the roof of a tank is retarded. It's a terrible gameplay mechanic and it makes certain nation's tanks (America and France) have a MASSIVE disadvantage and get NOTHING beneficial for some a huge drawback (All tanks that have huge hatches on the turret like that should have a MASSIVE view range advantage over ALL other tanks since that's what they were for).

[@tomaskadlec9534]

I think the experimental equipment that improves both gun handling and aiming time could be of use here - we're gonna have a bunch of resources from holiday ops so we could try to make that work

[@adgd62]

I’ve never tried the experimental equipment,and it feels like I never see people suggest using them, I wonder why?

[@KsCGames]

@@adgd62 because they are expensive to get upgraded to where they are worth while so you wont be wasting those equipment on tanks like this hunk of junk, they are used on clan wars competitive tanks

[@slimj091]

That's just polishing a turd.

[@pyra_cmd]

why bother? in its current state, you'd be earning less crew xp than if you just played your actual tech tree tanks because the tank is soooo much worse. Dont waste bonds, experimental equipment or any amount of time on tryign to make this tank work. Slap on some standard equipment, play it knowing it sucks and maybe you can have some fun :)

[@cottonandballs]

@@KsCGames But they can be unequipped for free if I remember right, so you can have a set of all 3 of them and that is basically enough.

[@samweise7638]

I think WG might be about to release a bunch of tier 9 premiums if they are giving us this??? Give everyone a taste of high tier so the people who haven't got high tier tanks are more tempted to buy the expensive tier 9 premiums

[@mikssityar3363]

I'm 90% sure you hit the mark there. I came across some youtube shorts of the new "Breakthrough SPG line" footage from the Russian test server, basically heavily armored TDs with indirect fire mechanics; a google translate of the comments later and how I understood it is the line will branch off and start at tier 9, knowing WG they introduce new tank mechanics via premiums first, so put two and two together right

[@darkbee2359]

I wonder if there's a chance, they might buff it a little after they've gathered some battle statistics for it. As a collector, I'll take the tank with thanks but I probably won't be playing more than a handful of games in it. It does give me hope that maybe we'll see the SU-122-54 maybe back in the game as a well deserved reward, as WG seems to be ready and willing to flood tier 9 with premium and reward vehicles now.

[@evilmac9623]

They know it is as bad as it is. It is a worse T54 heavy and that tank is a shitter. If they were going to buff it, they would have done it before release. This is only here to get people to return to the game and buy some boxes.

[@Marco-cl9pb]

It's a free tank and they know it's horrible from the start. It won't be buffed, it's not like that will make any extra money for them

[@NSAhitLIST]

I got lowe black and it's honestly terrible but I won't sell it.

[@evilmac9623]

@@NSAhitLIST The lowe at least still makes credits. This is a credit sink and it wont be fun to play.

[@poianbri]

We will probably see 15 Patton vs 15 Patton tomorrow. :D

[@perost1227]

fr

[@emilartwave]

Perfect time to mark our favorite tanks since barely anyone are gonna be playing them lol

[@domin727]

And one Deathstar going: nomnomnomnomnom with HESH..

[@robinkhn2547]

heavily doubt it, unless it is all casual players. Because veterans and good players will have watched tank reviews like this one and know not to bother with this tank. This tank has no novel gameplay or is fun in any way, so there is 0 reason to play it, unless you are a completionist who wants to 3-mark every tank.

[@domin727]

@@robinkhn2547 Casual players are exactly who is going to fill the matchmaker with these tanks. Obviously no one who watches reviews and knows about it is gonna play a lot but some people might still try. Low tier rewards where absolutely filling the matchmaker everytime as well and those most of the time werent any good either. If everyone gets it, many are gonna play.

[@FrenchBaguetteTank]

one idea: since wg is adding so many strange mechanics recently, why not introduce one for some American tanks with huge cupolas: a function similar to binoculars, where when still the view range is good, but when moving, bad.

[@radscorpion8]

the shuddering noises you made as your tank missed at 15:00 were excellent XD

[@rene837]

Yea, I certainly didn't expect anything else from WG

[@veoa416]

This is where experimental equipment might come in handy. I've slapped mine on the t30 and it works great to increase speed but also turning speed without the cost of dispersion, while costing only one slot. Even though t30 benefits more from the latter in terms of time spent aiming, 47 km/h is a lot different for a medium than 40 or 42 km/h. But then again, if WG truly wishes to gift, they should buff this thing a touch, even if it's just the armor or just the speed.

[@jucyl3monzz603]

Well now I know my tiger maus will just feed on these

[@Turtle_Dyl0]

at the time of writing this the present unlocks in 1 minute

[@LS-hl1yi]

The experimental turbo works well for this tank, as you are almost killing two birds with one stone Increasing speed and improving the gun handling a bit

[@jasonnan8798]

Not putting experimental equipment on a vehicle like that

[@SRgoonz]

This tank is the equivalent of a lump of coal from Santa Claus. Maybe this is WG saying that they hate us 😂

[@BLVCKCENT]

You should have compared it with T54 Heavy Tier IX from the auction 10 months ago

[@AdmiralChan365]

This tank has only one thing going for it: the looks. Even though it is horrendous even for me (a blitz player) statistically it does look good.

[@CadenE-x5i]

looks like a tank I would sell.

[@casuscnactus4864]

Except you can't because no 3 million credits for you.

[@krag9083]

​@@casuscnactus4864is that true?

[@kripperinoobviousino6019]

​@@krag9083it sells for 1000 credits so not worth selling

[@casuscnactus4864]

@@krag9083 Looked like it on Mailand's review with the CC Account.

[@CadenE-x5i]

It is. you get 1000 credits and a free garage slot. XD @@krag9083

[@younisramos259]

Man i was complaining about the gun handling of the wz-114 but at least that tank makes credits

[@briarus1000]

not sure why it wasn't compared with the american t54. seems like the closest thing in game to it. maybe "patton the tank" will also be able to win bonds? watching your reviews side-by-side was entertaining. not sure why the t54 got better camo than ptt. ah well here's to some interesting games...

[@georgekn3mp]

TS-54 is just a gimmick tank but still better than this Crapton. And oh, your avatar, 66th Armor Regiment unit crest....I was in 3/66AR way back in the late 80's with the first M1A1's sent to Germany in 2nd Armored Division (Hell on Wheels!)

[@arhangeo]

Moral of the story: If you want something decent, you have to pay for it...

[@StalwartLiar]

I guess this is going into the ”most op tier 9 tanks”, right?

[@ПётрЗеленский-ь2е]

Man, you're good! Thank you for being you :) Adding to my subscriptions list

[@Taffer-bx7uc]

I believe this is a T54E2 with a 120mm experimental gun. Strange choice of a name for this though

[@nomar5spaulding]

Yeah it has a super weird name.

[@ICCUWANSIUT]

Eh I mean it's a Patton testbed so it makes some sense Though I thought the Renegade was the T54E2

[@Taffer-bx7uc]

@@ICCUWANSIUT It is with a experimental 105mm gun.

[@timo7641]

good gun depression is balanced with a 10 story building cupola

[@popomko]

This makes the object 283 look good.

[@ICCUWANSIUT]

You think the 283 is bad? I always do well in it. It's not a sniper but you can't brawl so I assume that's why people don't like it.

[@popomko]

@@ICCUWANSIUT Good for you : obj. 283 has the worst winrate of all Tier IX mediums at 45.31%. Worst tech tree tank batchat 25tAP is far better at 46.76%.

[@animalyze7120]

@@ICCUWANSIUT Tank was a turd and still is, it was overrated because it was hard to get. Barely see them on the field and for good reason as they usually are the 1st back to the garage. That said it is light years better than this Patton PoS, they need to stop nerfing the US line with BS cupolas that would never act like this or they would have them removed IRL.

[@ICCUWANSIUT]

@@animalyze7120 Never played it actually, i thought he meant the Obj. 263. Probably trash though, so far the only decent rewards they've given out have been the Super Chaffee and Super Hellcat, VK 28 semi counts.

[@HSS_yt]

Probably because it was available as a rental for everyone. ​@@popomko

[@timo7641]

QB= play like a frontline HT Skill= play like a sniper schnitzel

[@xxstephxx1005]

Is this tank great no but it does have the potential to be mega buffed in the future

[@simonolej1982]

No way they buff a tank they gave for free

[@chetdietmeier6147]

So basically a t9 renegade with a 120mm that's worse than it's t8 105mm brother makes sense. You'd think the turret armor would be identical..

[@thepro9417]

one NOTE: if this tank were a TIER VIII tank even with a gun with less alpha damage it would actually be a good tank, for that tier.

[@GenHummel96]

I wouldnt take it even as a T7 🤣 Just because its abysmal gun handlung 😅 I hoped for 1,8 million credits by selling it, but WG managed to destroy that hope :/

[@thepro9417]

@@GenHummel96 you need to improve the gun handling above all, not turbo, not loading speed, not anything, gun handling is the way.. with base equipment i could improve the dispersion factors from 0.22/0.22/0.10 to 0.14/0.15/0.08

[@GenHummel96]

@@thepro9417 i know, but its still not my cup of tea with 0.33 dispersion 😅 I wont go to play it, i keep with my char futur 4, T55A and Concept 1B... Will be fun to slaughter this tank with 1B 😊

[@thepro9417]

@@GenHummel96 hahaha, by shear REASON i wont use this tank until i can get a discount on its equipments and i need to wait some months until the people forgets about this tank, these will be filled with people who knows how to counter this and people who uses it on stock or wrongly.. and let me tell you, this tank clearly only could work on the hands of experimented players.

[@GenHummel96]

I know, i have seen all of the videos about it and with 2300-2500wn8 recent, i guess i am quite experienced ✌️ But i wont play it anyway, becausw i dont play bad tanks... I dont even grind most tech trees any more, just because i have so many blueprints to afford it 😊

[@edsonleohancorea1602]

I played this tank just awhile ago and my first match was quite bad, i was litteraly aiming straight at the char futur 4 and yet i still missed, same for the other rounds. i like the 400 damage cuz ive never had any tank that has a damage higher than that, although i still love the tank because this is my first tier 9 and i appreciate wg for giving me this

[@gv_-06]

Crazy how wot gives you a tank that has no strengths

[@jacobw3652]

Thanks for the shout out, QB camo is the best camo

[@dementegg]

When I saw this tank I thought is this an upgrade of the renegade? But I see that even though they look alike they are not the same tank at all.

[@kripperinoobviousino6019]

Whenever WG gives a free tank it'll be a stinker, they never give everyone a good tank

[@FM-kl7oc]

1. People give up the game. 2. WG gives out free tank to get them back into the game. 3. Free tank is a terrible XP and HP piñata. 4. People who gave up the game are duly reminded why they gave up.

[@neeevirus]

Wargaming will do absolutely everything to make a tank pathetic if it's for free, while also doing absolutely everything to make a tank a mosnter if it's in holiday boxes (BZ-176)

[@thesnazzycomet]

Can’t believe they made a tank that looks this cool this bad. I mean it’s free so I understand but still

[@alphaxalex1634]

All I think this tank needs is 20m extra view range and some better dispersion values and it would be a fair tier 9 prem and maybe remove that over match area on the lower side. It’s clear that WG rightly don’t want these new prems to compete with regular tier 9s (the same logic behind the old tier 8 prems). Also with the last point I feel that all tier 9 prems should make a little more money as there isn’t a reason to play them over tier 8 prems but that’s a different issue.

[@domin727]

Its clear wargaming only want one thing and that is not to give people a good reward tank they might choose to play instead of buying an op premium. This should definitely be as good as regular techtree tanks. If it had anything to do with your point WG would have to nerve a lot of premiums or at least not make new ones as strong and they do seem to do everything but. Yes I'm looking at you Mr. BZ-176...

[@alphaxalex1634]

@@domin727 so my point on the reworks to the economy is to basically give players a choice. Either to play a tier 9 premium tank that is weaker than normal tier 9s but earns more or player a tier 8 premium which is as good or better than the normal tier 8s but earn less when compared to the tier 9 prems if that makes sense.

[@domin727]

@@alphaxalex1634 You could do this and it would not be a bad idea per say, but that would require a rework of a ton of tanks. Wargaming dont show any intention to do any of this. They just want to troll their player base a bit while on the surface appearing generous.

[@cbordagesg2]

So my first time trying this tank...I intentionally changed part of your build. I focused on improving my aim time and accuracy. The damage and alpha are what they are, so don't worry about it. I played it as a support med and it can truly wreck house

[@cnikkor]

Actually I'm fine with a free underpowered patton tank that could be buffed in the future, rathen then a big mistake from WG flooding the MM and ruining the game for everyone.

[@xxstephxx1005]

Yeah I think they didn't want another bz 176 situation but this tank can definitely be buffed in the future

[@Gentle_Ghost_Hunter]

Yep my thoughts as well. Imo the only thing that's truly holding this thing back is the gun handling. Low dpm doesn't matter if you can at least hit your shots (WZ-114 for example has even worse gun handling but fantastic .33 accuracy. Which if you let it aim hits most of the time) this being .4 is very disappointing.

[@sladjanteodosin4607]

Oh, my Skoda T 56 will be busy in the following days...

[@andrewhicks982]

Wargaming: We cherish you and all the time you play our game, so to show our appreciation here is the biggest hunk of junk we could possibly put together! We hope you enjoy this complete steaming pile of dog crap as our thanks to you for all the money you've spent this year!

[@csh5414]

Hey it’s free, you don’t have to play it and you don’t have to act like a spoiled brat. Crybaby whale.

[@ОлександрФілипчук]

JES! ENJOY!

[@StefanDrake]

Weak point ? Thats not a Weakpoint thats a tumor waiting to blow up!

[@Janduin45]

So maybe an experimental mobility system might be a decent fit on this, but that doesn't really feel worth it as a band aid on a bad tank.

[@berndschuster986]

nothing makes this shit anything near decent...

[@Janduin45]

@@berndschuster986 no, and I didn't say fitting that equipment would make it decent.

[@robertflint4115]

Dusting off the FV for some "One-shot" whoopers. Rock on Tankers 🤘😎

[@Peter-dy9sp]

A tier 9 is a nice gift. As Quickybaby said yesterday dont look a gifted horse in the mouth. Great job wargaming! Nice crewtrainer.

[@stevenmclaughlin2138]

cheers for the review QB.... good to know in adavance so we don't waste too much time on it later.

[@IAmTheCoastalGhost]

I'll take a free tank. I know it's crappy, but it's free, and free is free.

[@juanzulu1318]

Many thanks WG for the garage slot.

[@sebwot]

I'm a simple man. When I see that QB has published a tank review, I click on it.

[@ryokajimosensei2780]

After playing this tank QB, I think the build should be more like a heavy tank. Slap some view range in and the experimental turbo plus vents, it should work fine.

[@adamwestbrook1409]

I feel like this vehicle just exists so the big spenders at teir 10 can seal something in there 100 hour tanks they love to use

[@GoblinWarlordGaming]

Tell me your still at tier 5 after a year without telling me

[@RedXlV]

Of all the nerfs Wargaming gave this thing when bringing it down from Tier 10 to 9, the most inexplicable is the view range nerf. Tanks that have giant cupolas Should at least be compensated for the giant tumor of a weakspot by having good view range. The entire point of the cupola is to improve visibility for the commander, after all. "Patton the Tank" should absolutely not have less than 400m base view range. And the bloom when moving and turning the turret should at worst be the exact same as the Renegade. That way the tank wouldn't be absolutely demanding both Optics (which no American medium should need) and Vert Stab to be even playable. If those buffs were applied, the DPM would still be awful and it'd still be a medium with the mobility of a heavy but without the protection of a heavy. It would still be a bad tank. But at least it wouldn't be a tank that's *so* bad it would need 5-6 equipment slots to function.

[@Boltron]

T3 experimental equipment is what this tank needs.

[@00tree]

"This tank is garbage! Say ONE THING that is good about it!" "It looks cool."

[@zdinc7268]

QB, they already changed the tank. They have buffed it before release, though only slightly. It has had an increase to the dpm and improved accuracy

[@Karl.Kreuzberg]

Did you just put vents instead of a Vstab on a tank that has 0.22 gun dispersion on the move ?!?! You said yourself that you felt you have to use Vstab on the Renagade, which has 0.15 gun dispersion ! What's the point in gaining a few meters of view range when you can't hit a single shot ??? Equipement for this tank is Turbo (or equivalent) + Vstab + Gun Rammer, not questionnable.

[@kesharq5991]

This is the Christmas present you get were you'd rather play with the box instead.

[@jariheimoluoto4959]

This comparison of renegade actualy highlights how insanely good of a tank renegade is. By far my most favourite tank in this game. I would like to point out that the cupola weakpoint is not as big of a thing, because most people dont seem to shoot at cupolas nowdays.

[@Direwolf13PS3]

Worth noting the T123E6 120mm gun is closely related to the 120mm M58, and basically fires the same ammunition. WG giving it less pen on a medium makes little sense given it already has worse gun handling and DPM to 'compensate'. If this tank gets buffed the gun handling, view range, and fire rate should be improved. Pen can be left lower than the M103 as a trade off.

[@kizzzit5724]

I've watched 2 reviews this morning, they are both opposite in setup/equipment 1 says Play as a sniper and yours is more play heavy line or medium if not able to do heavy.. think till after Christmas The Cobra looks fun against this tank ?? LOL I'll Waite for a couple more reviews, then probably play it like my other Patton's with Vents/rammer/Aiming.... Sucky part is of American Medium tanks I have Only 1 tank that has a matching crew the M48 :( because of the damn radio operator being with the loader instead of the commander *sigh* Anyway THANKS for the Review n Gameplay !! ps. 1 last thing, I think to many of you Streamers/KZbinrs way over use Turbo now days.. 1/2 the maps+ are to small to care and you have gotten spoiled over the last couple years with Power Creep/Speed Creep :) You said it your self in your receipt playback of of old 2012-2014 videos back then the fast tanks went like 30-40 LOL Thanks Again

[@sgador]

Gonna be cope here but imagine if WG purposely releases this for free and waits for everyone to sell it then suddenly uber buff it in a year

[@daH4wk]

It is like getting a scratchy wool sweater as a present, you are going to try it once and then it ends up in the back of a wardrobe.

[@syncmonism]

It is a gift to the players playing against them. That's the true gift. It's a gift to the players who watch reviews like this, allowing a very short period of time where you will be able to farm them, especially the noobs playing them.

[@LuQ_aSS]

I think they should at least give it a free large repair kit, like they did with battle pass tanks if the stats are so bad...

[@TheCPT_Morgan007]

Wouldn’t taking a survivability slot be better if you’re making the view range worse? And plan on fighting heavies, because then you can use a hardening or improved config.?

[@cbjewelz]

Yea I feel like the way QB played this didn’t match his equipment. Pick your strategy and maximize what you can, eg hardening and stabilizer

[@danam0228]

I will keep in my garage for future trade-in event when that is most likely made available for tier 9s

[@donaldneill4419]

"In the plus column for this tank, it's not currently on fire."

[@juanzulu1318]

Long time ago WG tried to somehow reflect reality in their stats and gave tanks with high cupolas above average view range - which was nice as it helped players to intuitively assert the stats. Not so any longer it seems with this poor Patton version.

[@quarteratom]

Wargaming should ban Quickybaby for assisting the enemy team.

[@mittag6326]

When I entered the game and check the sell price of this I just laughed out loud. What an absolute insult of a gift.

[@sakamoto8354]

Tbh they should made this a premium tank so while yeah sure it's bad, you earn more credits than your regular tier 9 tanks.

[@huginstarkstrom]

I suspect, that there will be events that require you to play a T9 or T10 - now even inexperienced players will have a T9 tanks, making the event more fun for everybody. And then they'll add some op T9 premiums, that one could also use...

[@thecompyclub5310]

Highly doubt we ever see an op t9 premium they've been pretty good at keeping them at a very low performing level where a premium should be anyways

[@N22SY]

​​@@thecompyclub5310 it started the same with T8 premiums being as strong or weaker than the techtree counterpart, now we have the BZ overpowering the techtree counterpart in every way

[@patriklengyel9685]

Gonna pop in my Kpz 50t or my Tortoise tomorrow and will go for those bots playing a craphouse

[@ScreamyBanana]

I wish i could put two vertical stabilizer onto my Emil II.

[@lMrJackl]

It's only real strength is the pen and alpha so I'd equip it and play to that, using vstab, rammer and improved aiming. Begin battles by sniping and only after other vehicles are weakened or flanks have opened up you can move and make plays.

[@BetterCallKahl]

Running all premium is not an advantage for the average player

[@ICCUWANSIUT]

​@@BetterCallKahlyeah 242 is kinda weak at tier 9 for something that relies on the gun

[@nougan_gamer]

I'm gonna put QB Commander in "Patton the Tank", since QB doesn't like it, would be funny to hear him quib :)

[@user-Rjed]

Thanks @QuickyBabyTV for featuring me in IS 5

[@anayman7]

I'm using turbo, vertical stabilizer and coated optics, maybe in the future if the crew got more skills I would drop the optics, but I am considering the tank as a hull down tank with low aggressive nature, try to be behind the action and fire but even if you get caught you will ricochet some shots but the DPM will fail you

[@OaThKeeper981]

Kazjoo: “this monster of a heavy-medium underrated tank is insane”

[@MrStones2010]

How the hell could you spot the UDES03 at 14:23 which was right at your maximum view range? This game is broken.

[@wj157]

That 1k HP E4 shot was personal

[@aron_99]

I think Patton the Tank is a great tank (read target)! Makes for a nice clip when playing the Cobra...

[@davidtofan2430]

This should be compared to T54 Heavy tank and Iron Arnie, that's where it fits

[@thepro9417]

this tank should had been called patton TT-48, besides that, i believe you should improve dispersion factors above all! the gun loading or turbo is not really worth it if you cannot hit your shots.. i installed "improved rotation mechanism" on the first slot, vents on the second (it gets bonus too), and "vertical stabilizer" on the 3rd slot, the tank ends up having 0.14, 0.15 and 0.08 dispersion factors, THAT could improve the accuracy of the gun.

[@Hellcat19XDXD]

So, to sum up, as Quicky said, all of us may see a lot of people (included myself) playing this tank on the battlefield the next few days, probably a few weeks but soon enough it will disappear and no one will ever play it. At least its free what can i say. Another one to the garage. Mark my words. :)

[@anthonyalfeo1899]

After that, maybe do a video playing QB’s favorite tanks on each of your accounts. Merry Christmas