Qur’an vs The Bible: Little known facts

Рет қаралды 60,498

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 100

@r.rahman12 Ай бұрын

*Qur’an vs The Bible: Little known facts* 00:02 Introductory discussion : _Comparing, and contrasting the Qur'an with the Bible_ 01:48 Reference from _The Quran and the Secular Mind: A Philosophy of Islam_ by Dr Shabbir Akhtar [ pg 123 ] 10:39 Reference from _A History of the Bible: The Story of the World's Most Influential Book_ by Prof John Barton [ pg 239 ] 14:05 Back to Dr Shabbir Akhtar's book [ pg 123 ] 25:40 Concluding discussion : _The Qur'an has been preserved in its purity intact for all these 1400+ years, Alhamdulillah_ 30:47 Bonus : Video-clip on _The Birmingham Qur'an Manuscript_

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

So tell me, which Arabic version of the quran do you use and why that one? Or do you not even know that there are some 40 different versions of the Arabic quran we know of? Of course all these qurans were written by unknown authors. And how do you deal with all the mistakes, discrepancies, inconsistencies and contradictions in that quran as well as the approval of evil such as raping women who have been captures in battle (surah 33:50) which is adultery and wife beating (surah 4:34) as well as child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls. And we see that Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 year old child and then raped that child when it was just 9 years old. Clearly Mohammed disqualified himself as a prophet of GOD by the evil he perpetrated. And remember all of islam is only based what Mohammed maybe recited and how he lived. So tell me, why do you even believe that you will be with GOD our Father in heaven on judgement day when you follow Mohammed? And do show the quran verses on which you base your belief.

@eugene307 Ай бұрын

Quran is never preserved like " tame sheep eat the verse" that makes sheep greater then allah who cannot protect his quran. Now quran you have now is made by Cairo in 1924. Where is the old quran. You have total 29 different quran which quran is preserved by allah? At least study the subject you want talk about.

@r.rahman12 Ай бұрын

@@eugene307 here comes another brainless christian. was quran revealed in papers/books? even today if all the sheep in the world eat all the quran books, it will be again produced in less than an hour as perfectly as it has been. not the case with bible unfortunately.

@eugene307 Ай бұрын

The Birmingham Manuscript is not full quran. Briefly what is the Birmingham Qur'an Manuscript? A four-page manuscript made of parchment, written in ink, containing parts of Surahs 18,19 and 20 of the Qur'an. The manuscript's catalogue number is 'Islamic Arabic 1572a'. Where is rest? The original manuscript was sent back to Hafsah and Uthman then ordered all other unofficial copies to be burned or otherwise destroyed.

@MostRightWingManInBritain Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 Bro there's no such thing as 40 different Qurans they're either translations or different arabic dialects and you can't force anybody into relationships and you can't cause harm to somebody in 4:34 hence why the word "light" is used And Aisha isn't pre-pubescent So what does the Bible have? Dead sea scrolls are from 100-300 BC and are hundreds of years after Moses and the oldest Bible is from the 4th century AD What miracles do you have? My prophet gave women the right to divorce with equal and proportional inheritance (they don't have to pay any bills) 1300 years before the Western world did Did your Bible predict that arabia would revert to a land of gardens and meadows? Or that barefoot bedouin arabs would go from rags to building skyscrapers in one generation? Or that usury will become widespread? Or that the byzantines would return in 3 to 9 years? Or that a volcanic eruption would span all the way from medina to busra? Or that the caliphate would only last 30 years and then a monarchy would come after it? Or that clouds were observed to be heavy? That the sun and moon has an orbit 1300 years prior to human's understanding?

@Cyrenaican Ай бұрын

A very interesting lecture indeed. May God bless you, protect you and help you lead your community to the right path. Assalamu Alaikum from Libya.

@BloggingTheology Ай бұрын

wa alaikum assalam

@odeebob7826 Ай бұрын

It is truly amazing to hear the truth from a person who is knowledgeable about both the Quran and the Bible. Thank you brother Paul

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

This was absolutely laughable. He proved the Quran false without even realizing it. Couldn't be much dumber

@odeebob7826 Ай бұрын

@@Mamba4.8 I know the truth can be painful for Christian like you when it reveals falsehoods, as the Quran mentions in this verse “ And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart “ Quran 17 : 81

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

@@odeebob7826 I'm not a Christian. I don't hold no predetermined belief. I study all the scriptures of the world. They all have value. So I dunno what Christian's like me your referring too

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

@@odeebob7826 The Bible says the very same thing. What's your point trying to use the Quran to prove the Quran? I can use the same kind of text right out the Bible or other sacred texts. Because you can't use anything else, you can't use archeology, you can't use true historians, you can't use any other text because if you went to any other texts you'll realize your book is a copy. Your only authority is the Quran, and your stuck in that box because you can't use anything outside that box to prove it. Which means that is the most deceptive form of propaganda this world has ever seen. Interesting how he uses the argument "there was no sacred scripture of the begining of Christianity" That argument also proves 2 things. 1. There was never an injel 2. Why did the Quran copy the LEAST sacred and discarded of scriptures then. In trying to be too manipulative, and air headed (as he always is), he didn't even realize the arguments he's using prove the Quran false even more then whatever it proves of the Bible. See what Islam doesn't know that if Christianity gets proven false and it falls, Islam is totally false as well.

@Legacykinight Ай бұрын

@@Mamba4.8Go watch Dr Zakir Naik or other lectures if u have any questions abt Islam

@NYCyyc Ай бұрын

I went to a Buddhism school and then Christian school… I really want to learn more about Muslim, maybe start from Quran.. thanks for sharing.

@MJB0110 Ай бұрын

Amazing video Paul. It also deserves 1.7 million views. Thx for sharing.

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@saahirkhan7994 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 All of your talking points are non starters - it's like me saying to you, prove to me that YOU wrote the bible. If you maybe cited your sources for 40 different versions of the quran, perhaps you might be able to start a conversation. The reality is - as a christian, you have no proof that the bible as you know it today was the same as the first 3 centuries .... you know it's written by men like you and I .... but you are unable to come to terms with these facts.

@zarabees2123 Ай бұрын

@@saahirkhan7994this guy John 📀😊

@Kirk-d7v Ай бұрын

I hope he does a Hafs vs Warsh comparing?

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@@Kirk-d7v I doubt that my friend. As the hafs version of the Quran and warsh version of the Quran are the most used versions of the Quran they are the ones usually compared. You will find that number of verses in Hafs is 6236, while Warsh has only 6214 verses. In Surah Al imran 3:146 in the hafs Quran it states “And many a prophet fought” and in the warsh Quran it states “And many a prophet was killed”. In verse 2:184, the Hafs Quran reads the verse to be "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person...". On the other hand, the Warsh Quran reads it "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding poor people..." Logically prophets being killed is not the same meaning as prophets fighting and feeding one is different in meaning from feeding many. Clearly we have two different versions of the quran here which proves that the qurans (plural) have not been perfectly preserved. Differences between hafs and warsh Quran. www.free-minds.org/sites/default/files/WhichQuran.pdf

@harriskhan7671 Ай бұрын

brother paul jazakAllahhukhair.

@sidlajis3115 Ай бұрын

Very insightful! Keep up your noble efforts pls

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694 Ай бұрын

3/4 of the stories in the Quran are copied from Biblical myths and legends. The Quran is mostly the Old Testament version 2, but in Arabic, with more modern rules and regulations for its time that are still abhorrent and barbaric for our time: Allowing and practicing slavery and sex-slavery of captured women was repeated as normal 14 times in the Quran Harsh vengeful disfiguring punishments that are not meant to correct and reform but spread terror. A cheap and supremacist look at non believers. Now back to scientific and historical myths in Islam and I will stick to those common with Judaism and Christianity; The creation of the universe in six days where Earth takes the lion share in an upside down backward ignorant order (Surat Fussilat/ Book of Genesis) Creation of the first human being from the dust (sand/ mud) of Earth as a male adult with no childhood and his female from his own body for him to mate with her (his own genes) and their kids have children through incest!!!!! Earth in described in both books as a large flat disc with seven heavens supported ABOVE Earth with no pillars that we can see. The Sun and moon created after Earth and they each has an orbit but failing to mention that Earth is in an orbit too and that the Earth and moon effectively orbit the sun. The flood myth The Abrahamic covenant myth, given the land of Canaan to some wandering Mesopotamian. The Exodus story and receiving the 10 commandments and entire Torah in the Egyptian desert. King Solomon that DOES NOT EXIST in history Virgin Birth Gog and Megog The double horned king End of day wars and bloodshed The return of ‘a’ messiah Heaven and Hell Except heaven in Islam is a Brothel with sex females and handsome young male servants Don’t be fooled by the ‘nice’ verses in the Quran. There are many ‘bad’ verses that attack Jews, Christians and idol worshippers and describe them as animals and people that must be fought and ruled by Muslims.. While the Torah commands the killing of all men, women, children and animals, the Quran being a more modern book commands the killing of men and the sex enslavement of women, and labour enslavement of children… Jesus did not live long enough to become a warlord like Moses or Muhammad. He still commanded his followers to outcast or kill those who don’t believe in him. He also prepared a lake of fire and sulphur for them, and will annihilate non believers when he comes back… All religions are man made and the Abrahamic ones are the most supremacist and dangerous. Abandon religion. Don’t leave one set of myths to another, especially if it has more in common with the set you want to leave than you think.

@MOYNTH Ай бұрын

May Allah bless you sir and grant you all the best. Greetings from Egypt ❤💙

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@MostRightWingManInBritain Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 You're really copy and pasting this in the entire comment section?

@sadiqhoq5964 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688wait till you're in your grave,

@zarabees2123 Ай бұрын

@@MostRightWingManInBritainThis Guy John Zuma is on every Muslim channel, he thinks he knows better & want to teach Muslims. Idol worshipper has no shortage of ignorance .

@SawsanYasen-nu5vo Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688there is one copy .stop deceive ur self 🤫

@bugsbunny5977 Ай бұрын

Keep up the good work 😊❤

@sumardon Ай бұрын

Paul, that's our wonderful Paul, may Allah reward him for all his hard work and for sharing their fruits with everybody, I think realised that he'd made a slip of the tongue when he said, about 5 minutes into the video, "the 2nd letter of Peter", but in trying to correct that he repeated the slip of the tongue. I think he meant the 2nd letter of Paul to his student Timothy. Thank you Paul and keep up the good work.

@megano.7836 Ай бұрын

Most Christians are so emotionally tied to their religion and it’s been a part of their life for so long. Admitting their book is not accurate would mean having to admit that their lives and beliefs are based on a lie. They don’t want to let go of what they know. So they keep up the cognitive dissonance.

@raycrossley5398 15 күн бұрын

There Faith is not bast on the bible it's based on believeing in Christ . The bible not Christ or God. The bible are 64 book of witnesses contact with the spiritual realm. Your fath is bast on a man made book written by a goat Herder. In the seventh century, the guy kidnapped Jewish scribes family's after they completed the work he killed them and there family's.

@rabbannibey1128 14 күн бұрын

That goes for everyone who isn't in or of the "Saved Sect" from all 3 Abrahamic Faiths that the Prophet pbuhahp mentioned about. All Sects of religion go into the Hellfire except those who follow the "Vicegerency of Allah swt Sect.

@oladayopopoola-e6h 3 күн бұрын

How many Christians have you talked to, to have this conclusion. You must be delusional to believe this.

@MA-qn7rg Ай бұрын

Superb. Thank you for this most informative presentation…

@oualidtrabelsi5784 Ай бұрын

Brother Paul I discovered your videos recently and I am very enthusiastic about your quality, both in research and in presentation. May Allah reward you abundantly for your efforts!

@makhan89 Ай бұрын

When they say “brought to Birmingham in the 1920’s” what they really mean is “stolen from [insert colonized land] in the 1920’s”

@danielburger1775 Ай бұрын

Or "created in Birmingham in the 1920s"...

@makhan89 Ай бұрын

@@danielburger1775 said the colonizer

@danielburger1775 Ай бұрын

@makhan89 You need to clear your mind of all preconceived notions. Forget what you think you "know" about religious history, whether it be Islam, Christianity, Judaism, or any other. Use facts, logic, reason. The truth is ALL "Abrahamic" Religions only BEGIN around the "15th"/"16th" centuries. The Bible was written in Latin. The first Bible was the 1590 Sisto Vulgate. The Koran was written under instruction of Ottoman Sultan Ahmed I in the early "17th" century. There was no "Council of Nicaea". The first and only Council was Tr(id)ent. There were no Christian or Muslim campaigns against Persians. No Crusades pitting Christians against Muslims. No Spanish Expulsion of Jews. And, before the "16th" century, nobody was ever punished for being the "wrong" religion. Because there was only One. Using dates like "367 AD" or "622 AD" is utterly meaningless.

@alisolilac Ай бұрын

@@danielburger1775What in the world are you talking about lol? It seems like when Christians know their religion is a fallacy and that Islam is the truth they really have to come up and stoop to these crazy lies don’t they! Or they just want attention. Like the well known quote from Sun Tzu says ‘the whole secret lies in confusing the enemy.’ Just stop mate. 😂

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

stolen? no one in the moslem world was even aware of this manuscript, LOL.............. ............. how can you steal something that the owner does not value?

@azch6424 Ай бұрын

Assalam Alaykum brother Paul. Absolutely brilliant video especially for giving dawah to Christians. Jzakallah khayran!❤

@BloggingTheology Ай бұрын

wa alaikum assalam and thanks!

@anyq_CS Ай бұрын

imagine someone like david wood really read, study and being honest about Quran. but the money is too good i guess

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

but what about the rest of humanity, who do not get paid money and they read the koran and do not find it to be from God? there are TENS OF MILLIONS of people across Europe and USA/Canada that have received copies of the koran in their native language from some dawa organization or another............. not even 3% of them think it is from God

@myxos Ай бұрын

David Wood and his garbage followers aren't interested in truth. They're running a racket because it's good business tricking uneducated Christians. They assume because they use some Qur'anic references that they're knowledgeable but they're clueless about Islam.

@ibrahimstevens3926 Ай бұрын

Maybe but I think it's more that he's too arrogant to be sincere and too ignorant to understand

@achmedk3658 Ай бұрын

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy *The Quran was so meticulously preserved for it is the Book of Guidance for humanity till the end of time. That is why it does not address the Arabs alone in whose language it was revealed. It speaks to man as a human being: >>O mankind, what has deceived you concerning your Lord, the Generous.

@TheMuslimApologist Ай бұрын

Why would an ex con who once beat his daddy with a hammer ⚒️ care about the truth?

@achmedk3658 Ай бұрын

*The Quran was so meticulously preserved for it is the Book of Guidance for humanity till the end of time. That is why it does not address the Arabs alone in whose language it was revealed. It speaks to man as a human being: >>O mankind, what has deceived you concerning your Lord, the Generous.

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@Shabs2456 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 please go and educate yourself, but keep well away from Islamophobs.

@Shabs2456 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688why are you even on here, obviously not to learn. Go and study your bible, educate yourself.

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@@Shabs2456 My friend, I have studied the Bible and the quran and I still have a few question about Mohammed and the many versions of the quran we have. I was hoping that some Muslims here could answer my questions, but so far no luck. So let me repeat my questions and maybe you can answer me. 1) The quran states that Mohammed’s “the god” (that is all that allah means) is guarding the quran. Yet I have TWO very different versions of the quran in Arabic right here at home, which proves that the quran is not perfectly preserved. We also read that Uthman burnt all of the versions of the quran based on what Mohammed recited which shows that Uthman did not believe that the quran was from GOD. So did Mohammed lie about “the god” guarding the quran, or was Mohammed’s “the god” not capable of guarding the quran? Either way, this proves that the quran is not from GOD? 2) Do you know that there are some 40 different versions of the Arabic quran we know of? So which quran is the one kept by Mohammed’s “the god” in heaven? And which version of the quran do you use and why that one? 3) These different versions of quran were written by unknown authors. As this is something Muslims keep throwing at Christians about the Gospel writers, how does one deal with the fact that the quran writers are all unknown? This makes hypocrites out the people who follow Islam. 4) How does one deal with all the mistakes and contradictions in the quran? Muslims claim the quran is perfect, so why all the mistakes and contradictions? 5) How does one deal with the approval of evil in the quran such as raping women who have been captures in battle (surah 33:50) which is rape and adultery, both are evil and condemned by GOD as being evil. 6) How does one deal with wife beating (surah 4:34). Would you like your father to beat your mother? I would not, so how can I accept that this is from GOD? 7) How does one deal with child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And we see that Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 year old child and then raped that child when it was just 9 years old. 8) So tell me, why do you believe you will be with GOD our FATHER in heaven on judgement day when you follow Mohammed? You see to me this clearly disqualified Mohammed as a prophet of GOD which means that islam cannot be from GOD. And remember all of islam is only based what Mohammed maybe recited and how he lived.

@michey5790 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 can any muslim answer this???

@monowararoshid4029 Ай бұрын

So interesting and illuminating. Thank you Paul

@abuharun223 Ай бұрын

May Allah continue to guide you Paul

@jasongreen6971 Ай бұрын

Paul could you make another gold nugget video with the Coach, the thinker, Firas Zahabi? Especially on the topic of Plato and Islamic philosophy he‘s got amazing wisdom. On his channel he does not like to get into these topics because they are to much on the deep end. His position on Neo Platonist thinkers would be appreciated, especially in context of the work of Dr. Hasan Spiker. Thank you very much Brother Paul! Great work as always.

@BloggingTheology Ай бұрын

Great idea!

@jasongreen6971 Ай бұрын

@@BloggingTheologyBrother Paul you are a gentleman and a scholar!

@abdul-muizzbusari206 Ай бұрын

Salam alaikum brother Paul, watching from Nigeria.

@BloggingTheology Ай бұрын

wa alaikum assalam

@iswiyanto2146 Ай бұрын

Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala be with us ..always❤

@s3youtubevids156 29 күн бұрын

These insights are quite brilliant. What contributions he has made. May Allah reward dr Akhtar and allow his brilliant efforts in this life raise him high in the hereafter

@MahsaSara Ай бұрын

Monotheism: Bible: "The LORD our God, the LORD is one." ☝🕍 Qur'an: "He is Allah, [who is] One." ☝🕌 Both texts stress the oneness of God, rejecting polytheism. 🙏 Creation: Bible: Describes God creating heavens and earth in Genesis. 🌍✨ Qur'an: "Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days" 🌎🌟

@Arctturius Ай бұрын

According to the Islamic qualification rules the Bible would be even below "weak". There are chains of narratives in Islam and even if there was a chain and one of the narrators were missing that whole hadith is considered weak...then imagine what the Bible will be according to our rules.

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

The hafs version of the quran states in Surah 3:3 that the Torah and the Gospel were revealed by God. That logically makes them the Word of God as that is how God reveals. We then see in surah 6:115 that Mohammed tells us that none can change the Word of God. So logically according to the quran the Torah and the Gospel we have today must be the same as the original Torah and the Gospel revealed by God. If not, then that makes the quran false. And of course we see in Surah 5:47 that Mohammed tells the Christians to judge by the Gospel which of course only makes sense if the Gospel the Christians had at the time of Mohammed was the correct one. And of course we know that the Gospel used by Christians at the time of Mohammed teaches the same message as the Gospel we use today. And from the Dead Sea Scrolls we know that God teaches the same the Torah today as He teaches in Torah more than 2000 years ago. So according to the hafs quran the Bible we have today is correct and is the same as the original. If that is not true, then the quran must be false. This means if the quran is correct, then Bible (Torah and Gospel) are correct which makes Mohammed a false prophet as the Bible teaches us that someone who behaved like Mohammed is a false prophet. On the other hand if the Bible has been changed, then the quran must be false which means that Mohammed was a false prophet. Either way, Mohammed was a false prophet.

@MostRightWingManInBritain Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 Injeel != the Bible we know as today And Hafs is an arabic dialect, the arabic is the same you just pronounce it differently

@MostRightWingManInBritain Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 The dead sea scrolls is hundreds of years after Moses

@MostRightWingManInBritain Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 5:47 is in reference to "What Allah has revealed in it" The Bible has multiple different authors and is a collection of different books

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@@MostRightWingManInBritain You say >> Injeel != the Bible > And Hafs is an arabic dialect, the arabic is the same you just pronounce it differently

@sherif.1977 Ай бұрын

Paul’s letters remind me very much of letters of ibn Tamiya to different towns teaching them the Islamic creed but ofcourse we never thought of taking his letters as scripture

@ampagetech2624 Ай бұрын

Ibn Taimiya , Ibn Taimiya , the sole authority of an extremist sect. Please Spare us the mention of this mans name. A tree does not make a forest - Islam has a great number better and more illustrious scholars and men of Allah.

@sherif.1977 Ай бұрын

@@ampagetech2624 bro chill

@PakuZero Ай бұрын

@@ampagetech2624Instead of back biting a dead scholar who you will never be able to ask forgiveness from until the day of judgement maybe you should be quiet

@Chickencee Ай бұрын

@@ampagetech2624ibn taymiyya made a great many mistakes, but he isn’t the cause of the pseudo salafi sect. That was miaw

@tomceman4451 Ай бұрын

@@ampagetech2624 A scholar says anything and everything.

@williammichael2156 Ай бұрын

Thanks for this...

@salahEddine-qb7px Ай бұрын

MashAllah, I can read from this very early Quran…so amazing and what an incredible honour!

@MuhammadAbdElhalim-jh2os Ай бұрын

Sunan Abi Dawud 3763 Abu Hurairah said: (The Messenger of Allah *Peace and blessings be upon him* never expressed disapproval of food; if he desired it, he ate it, and if he disliked it, he left it alone)

@miscgar9663 Ай бұрын

Devil deceives to make people sin by 1. Throat off bad people to shed blood 2. Marry many women here in the name of helping them and get many in heaven 3. Go far place to Rotate around black stone 4. Take jaziya from mankind of other race saying third class 5. Finally Make AI to say this is what God says

@KartOno-tj6uv Ай бұрын

Book = "The Amazon Qur'an" Author = Dr Gary Miller 👍

@amaribnrabah4439 Ай бұрын

Quran - al-hamdoulillah - is presereved (by some means: human actions) both in the chests (=hearts) by memorization and in a scriptural way; this are the principal means how Allah - the most High - preserved the Quran by and for muslims and all humanity ! The Birmigham Quran manuscript is really a beautiful and sacred discovery ! Al-hamdoulillah to the Lord of all worlds and djazakum Allahu khairan brother Paul for your valuable talk.

@hamidabattla758 Ай бұрын

Dear Paul, you’re an intelligent man,with a good background in Christianity & now a Muslim. MashaAllah! You are bringing up very fundamental subjects for your video presentations. Even as a Muslim I have learned a lot about the deviation of Christians from their original God given scripture.What amazes me is that Christians who are educated people in worldly matters ,how can they be so ignorant about the fundamental truths of their religion. There is something seriously wrong here.

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@amaribnrabah4439 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 I can understand your reaction toward the reality and faithfulness of the holy Quran since your actual Bible is not prserevd and not authentic as the Quran is (Quran is the word of Allah revealed to Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him by the Angel Gabriel peace be upon him).REMARK_1: As muslims, we believe in the book revealed to Prophet Jesus "al-Indjil الإنجيل" and to all Prophets - Peace be upon them all - but in their original form not the actual and apocryphal text changed by men according to their envies and written after the Prophets (PBUT) were gone! REMARK_2: The word Allah (=God) is close to the name of the one God as called by Jesus in Aramaic ܐܠܗܐ (ʼĔlāhā) إلاها so don't be confused! there is only one God : Allah and Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the Muhammad among others peace be upon them all the are prophets and ambassadors of Allah - the one God, the Creator of all things and owner - to humanity and Djins. There is only one version of the Quran (not 40 as you are pretending!!!) The slight differences are in the recitation of the text some variants of words (because of the rich Arabic language and its patterns!) such as: "Tazawaru تزاور"and "Tazwarru تزور" [ Verse 17, of sourate el-Kahf الكهف (cf. chapter of the Cave, 17) ] but having the same meaning... I invite you to read the Quran and judge by yourself (not taking for granted and considering as true what some non-scientific and unfaithful parts say!) For the false idea about captives, the Quran speaks about marying them and not raping them since their men felt in battle so they need men that can take care ooff them so they survive and be protected; but they should be treated with respect in all cases. Prophet Muhammad never raised his hand over (he never beat) one of his wives all his life peace be upon him. Prophet Muhammad married Aicha at the age of 15 to 18 years and the common naration saying that the mariage and consummation was 6 - 9 years old respectively is not true... Islam is to sbmit to one God Allah to believe in Him the ALLMIGHTY and in all the angels, all prophets, all the sciptures, the day of judgement and to do good deeds and good in this life for all the creatures... Brother John read the Quran and you will understand more incha'Allah (by Allah's will).

@hartley1207 Ай бұрын

😂😂😂 you never read your bible from child marriage to killing raping ,wife beating its in your bible.Even slicing open with a sword the stomachs of pregnant pregnant women in Deut.25 what happen to hand of the wife when she touches the nuts of another man when she helps you in a fight. Deut.13 even killing the wife if she take on a new religion . The raping of the young girls in 1Sam 15:3 your god was a serial killer and rapist.😂.@johnzuma4688

@Rhoda-r6j Ай бұрын

And, Paul, the Gospel is NOT merely Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The word Gospel literally means “Good News” and occurs 93 times in the Bible, in the New Testament. In Greek, it is the word euaggelion, from which we get our English words evangelist, evangel, and evangelical. The Gospel is, broadly speaking, the whole of Scripture; more narrowly, the Gospel is the Good News concerning Christ and The Way to Salvation. The Gospel, the Good News, is found throughout the Old Testament as fulfillment of prophecies and throughout the New Testament as the components of the Good News, as in Romans 3:23, Hebrews 9:22, Romans 8:3-4, Hebrews 10:5-10, Hebrews 10:3-4, Hebrews 10:11-18, Hebrews 10:11-18, John 14:19, 1 Corinthians 15:3-6, Romans 1:16, Ephesians 2:8-9, and others. If you want the Old Testament list of Scripture related to the Good News Gospel, let me know.

@Pierre-vn5rh Ай бұрын

Bonjour Paul, Fascinant sujet! Comparaison entre l'Ancien Testament, le Nouveau Testament et le Coran. Le Coran, bien que sa compilation initiale est très critiquée, reflète assez bien ce que le prophète Muhammad a reçu de l'Ange Gabriel. Toutefois les difficultés se manifestent sur quelques points: 1) La chronologie des versets; 2) le contexte a été ajouté par après; 3) les versets ambigus et les versets claires: qui est autorisé à donner les interprétations des versets claires? 4) la ponctuation et les diacritiques étaient absents. Il fallait connaître la bonne récitation et quand s'arrêter pour donner la signification des phrases. Une récente recherche faite dans Le Coran des historiens édité par Ali Amir Moezzi et Guillaume Dye, cela serait bon de faire une analyse de ces volumes qui semblent être très appréciés par les spécialistes. Je n'ai pas encore à ma possession, je risque de me l'offrir pour Noël. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@youssefjrad3319 Ай бұрын

الحمد لله على اتباعك الحقيقة و نجوة بنفسك من عذاب جهنب كم انا سعيد بك بالتباعك الحقيقة وهو الدين الاسلام و تغلبت على العناد و خالفت دين الاجداد .شكرا اخي بول سوف نلتقي ان شاء الله عند الحوض مع رسول صل الله علي و سلم و نشرب من يديه الشريفتين حتى لا نضما بعدها ابدا .

@salemali8888 Ай бұрын

Thank you for this informative video. The Quran does tell us that Jesus "عيسى علية السلام" was sent with "ENJEEL". I wonder where the ENJEEL is.

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

It doesn't exist 😅

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

God can "preserve the Quran" but couldn't preserve the "Injeel". And then he just used the argument there was NO sacred scripture of Jesus. Yet your book copies the least of those scriptures around. It's absolutely hilarious how he's proving your book false while thinking he's proving it right

@eldagon9306 24 күн бұрын

Mashallah, brother Paul! May Allah keep you firm on the True path.

@NadDew Ай бұрын

32:52 "It is no intention of letting these pages from world history leave Birmingham" Oh British can't resist not being British 😔

@mightyfive Ай бұрын

MashaaAllah I always admire all your works brother. May Allah be pleased with your efforts in Da’wah. I Recently moved to the UK in London and I would love to be able to visit Birmingham one day. Is the Qur’an manuscript available to be viewed by the public?

@EslamNawito Ай бұрын

Also note Paul "Saul" quoted from "Apocrypha " whom he referred to Inspired by God !!!!

@NailTouze-l2k Ай бұрын

Paul Williams is Not the foundation of Christianity 🤦 bro!!! 😡 This guy is a Muslim KZbinr, from when he was travelling in 1 century?

@Abulmaaly Ай бұрын

Book of Enoch, I think that was Peter !!

@NailTouze-l2k Ай бұрын

@@Abulmaaly do you have evidence?

@tomceman4451 Ай бұрын

@@Abulmaaly Don't tell me what you think. Tell me the truth.

@tomceman4451 Ай бұрын

@@NailTouze-l2k do you have evidence?

@talantryspaev7659 20 күн бұрын

"...one day of your Lord equel to a thousand years in your calculation." 22/Al-Hajj:47. ---In the Bible: "...one day is of your Lord as a thousand years..." 2/Peter 3:8. This verse (!!) of the Bible is distorted, because in the Original Bible verse was: " ..one day of your Lord equel to a thousand years in your calculation...." 2/Peter 3:8. So, we have to make calculations (!!!) to understand the Bible and the Qur'an!

@guntekinazimoglu1276 Ай бұрын

Thank you, brother for another interesting content. Yes, Quran is completely authentic and fully preserved scripture, the word of God. And it's a shame that despite of this fact its the most frequently recited but not read book, and it's a shame that only 10% of so called Islam religion is based on Quran and the rest 90% is based on tradition of forefathers and fairytales. I know that you're a man of reason, and I sincerely hope that you're far from what they associate with Him... Love and peace...

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

exactly! - what a husband should do if wife misbehaves in marriage? ------ based on quran (4:34) - what a wife should do if husband misbehaves in marriage? ------ based on tradition because the quran makes no mention of what a wife should do, it is only interested in the husband (man)

@thelemurofmadagascar9183 Ай бұрын

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy Are you seriously trying to criticize Allah's word? If you're a Muslim, then do towbah. This is a severe and grave sin. As a Muslim woman myself, I don't have a single issue with any of the commands or advice in the Quran. Allah knows better than I do.

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

@@thelemurofmadagascar9183 "As a Muslim woman myself, I don't have a single issue with any of the commands or advice in the Quran. " ............ that is EXACTLY what the moslem men want............... you HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD lady.........

@douchebagguette2717 Ай бұрын

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy interesting. muslim women never wonder. why does allah go into great detail in the quran, about how a husband should deal with a nasty wife? but is totally silent about how a wife should deal with a nasty husband? but ofcourse muslim men are angelic husbands. they do not do bad things. so why talk about something that does not exist in real life. muslim women on the other hand are nasty ladies. bad wives. and so allah has to give clear directions on how to deal with these denzins of hell.

@facetofloor Ай бұрын

If someone criticizes the Qur’an, then they are not a Muslim.

@Noman-y1g Ай бұрын

Keep up the good work

@nabilmohjazi4694 Ай бұрын

Is the Bible like a weak Hadeeth?

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

the koran is basically like a strong hadeeth......... but the blind see not

@nyqon Ай бұрын

No - Christian Bibles are more like Fabricated Hadeeths. Weak Hadeeths weren’t manipulated and edited, generally the transmitters weren’t as pristine as Saheeh/Hassan.

@Prophet--sawasam-sawasam Ай бұрын

@Asif Khan --- NO NO NO ... the Koran is basically NOT like a strong (saheeh Hadith or mutawatir or how else learned people say). Koran is Revelation from God Almighty . Hadeeths (does not matter how saheeh , strong they may be) are word of Prophet saws - a human being.

@zphre7548 Ай бұрын

Since the Bible doesn't have any unbroken chains of transmission, it would be given a grade of fabricated

@zphre7548 Ай бұрын

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy Yeah. The Holy Quran is even better in essence than the grade of Mutawattir (agreed upon), the highest possible grade. This only occurs when the sheer number of unbroken chains is such a huge number that it becomes impossible for every single person to have agreed upon something false. It is better than even that because God Himself says that He will take it upon Himself to protect it.

@AkbarKamalUmrani Ай бұрын

Amazing indeed and extremely shoking news that such a rare copy isn't available even at Macca and Madina despite its places of revelation. Again it reminds us regarding the guarantee of the Almighty of Quran,s preservation and safeguarding. No doubt Allah is the greatest.

@mymore195 Ай бұрын

*It's a promise of Allah.* *Nothing to do with humans.* Thanks brother Paul

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@TheQuranChannel123 29 күн бұрын

This is huge by any stretch of the imagination. Well done, brother; your work speaks for itself. No involvement of God in the formation of the Gospels and the New Testament as a whole.

@Kirk-d7v 16 күн бұрын

Michael Rood in his presentation “the chronological gospels” totally disagrees with your statement.

@TheQuranChannel123 16 күн бұрын

@@Kirk-d7v Hello! Which specific points do you think he misunderstood? I study the Bible as well, and I can tell you that the New Testament is essentially a compilation of diverse writings. Each book was a collection of various documents written by unknown authors, gradually assembled over time into what we now call Gospels or Epistles. Notably, there’s no internal evidence suggesting that, for example, Matthew himself wrote what we refer to as the Gospel of Matthew.

@Kirk-d7v 16 күн бұрын

@ Colossians 4:14 identifies Whic Bible author?

@Kirk-d7v 16 күн бұрын

@@TheQuranChannel123 I am not going to rehash Michael Rood’s research on ….”The Chronological Gospels” life and seventy weeks ministry of Yeshuah the Messiah.

@TheQuranChannel123 16 күн бұрын

@@Kirk-d7v Here is Colossians 4:14: "Our dear friend Luke, the doctor, and Demas send greetings." Show where it says that Luke wrote a gospel. Besides, Luke was a gentile; by default, he had nothing to do with Jesus's teachings.

@massemarboyo8465 Ай бұрын

So if we bring what bible is in Islamic language, Bible is the mix between Quran and Hadist on one book... Without any strong sanad...

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@massemarboyo8465 Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 yes, I never know about that... Please tell me which scholar said that there is 40 version of the quran and please tell me all of these version...

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@@massemarboyo8465 Here the list of the different versions of the quran. 1, Qaloon Qur'an 2, Al- susi(ibn-katheer) Qur'an 3,Khaled QUR'AN 4,Idrees QUR'AN 5,warsh Qur'an 6, Hafs Ad- Dury (Abu - Amro alBasri) QUR'AN 7,Al- Laith QUR'AN 8,Al- Bazzi Qur'an 9,Al- Azraq QUR'AN 10,As - Susi (Abu Amro alBasri) QUR'AN 11,Ad - Dury(alkisa'i) QUR'AN 12, Ibn shanboodh Qur'an 13,Al- Asbahaani QUR'AN 14,Hisham QUR'AN 15,Ibn Dhakwan QUR'AN 16,Isa BinWardan QUR'AN 17,Sulayman QUR'AN 18, Ibn Jammaz QUR'AN 19,Ahmad bin Farah QUR'AN 20,Qunbul Qur'an 21,Showba QUR'AN 22, Ruwais QUR'AN 23,Shujaa' bin Abi Nasr Al- Balakhi QUR'AN 24, Abu Amro Al -Ala QUR'AN 25,Hafs QUR'AN 1924 Cairo edition 26, Sana QUR'AN 27, Al- Dury(Al Hasan AlBasri) QUR'AN 28, Hafs Al - Dury(ibn kathir) QUR'AN 29,khalf QUR'AN 30,Ishaq QUR'AN 31,Al Hasan bin Said Al- Matuu'l QUR'AN 32, Abu- Farah Al- Shan - budhi QUR'AN 33,Ibn Masud QUR'AN 34,Ubai kab QUR'AN 35, Ruh QUR'AN 36,Abu Musa QUR'AN 37,Hafs QUR'AN 1982 edition 38, Ibn Abbas QUR'AN 39,Topkapi Qur'an 40, Samarkand Kufic Qur'an

@JohnnieWalkerGreen Ай бұрын

You should start by defining "the Quran" and "the Bible." Then, explain what you mean by "the original Quran" and "the original Bible." Otherwise, there is a chance that we are talking about totally different objects.

@emes6333 Ай бұрын

Let's assume we know what he means cos it's at obvious what he means by QURAN

@JohnnieWalkerGreen Ай бұрын

@@emes6333 Great! Let's start with it. How many ayat is that obvious Quran? 6214? 6217? 6236? 6666?

@emes6333 Ай бұрын

@@JohnnieWalkerGreen okay lemme put it this way , why no islamaphope uses this great point 👍 of yours in their arguments?

@emes6333 Ай бұрын

@@JohnnieWalkerGreen it's ignorant point that's why. because its An established fact that no intellectual have question about it except for school boys like you asking school boys questions like that . I rather have an educated islamaphope who will not argue about if Muhammad was even real or some bs

@MBEG89 Ай бұрын

@@emes6333 i wanna see this play out, let him ask his questions

@Shabs2456 Ай бұрын

MashAllah Brother Paul looks amazing, may Allahazzawajal keep him safe.

@kausamsalam8543 Ай бұрын

Ameen

@muhammedali7280 Ай бұрын

Islam is Not a Religious to worship God but Itis the Rules and Guidence to Maintain Our all Problems in this Life😂in short it is the Catalog 4 us.😅

@thetriumphsprint Ай бұрын

That didn't make sense, either linguistically or logically. Linguistically, the word Islam means to submit, to surrender, to obey God. Allah, in the Qur'an states, in Surah 51:56 ”I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me.”

@bristolrovers27 Ай бұрын

The Christian New Testament and how it changed up until we have today might be an interesting podcast

@robertpundsack1363 Ай бұрын

I'll stay with the bible.

@jennyparfum Ай бұрын

Why?

@AsifKhan-hf9zy Ай бұрын

@@jennyparfum because your sins are forgiven. you do not have to go to jail or pay huge financial penalties. you sin, commit a crime, you repent. and you do not have to worry about eternal torture in the afterlife. no shariah law scaring you, no religious police, nothing. sin, repent, go to heaven, sin again, repent again. rinse and repeat.

@robertpundsack1363 Ай бұрын

@@jennyparfum Because I through a personal relationship with my God. He came down to be our pure sacrifice . Offering any ,, salvation. A peace of mind. An awaking from the worlds grip. A love the world can not give. An ear , a direction strength.

@surendirenparthasarathy9087 Ай бұрын

I'll stay with secular humanism.

@thetriumphsprint Ай бұрын

@@robertpundsack1363you came to the wrong channel mate. What you speak of refers to your personal emotional feelings, and that is valid, and the faith you have developed through that. This channel is about scholarship of theological subjects. Paul Williams is very versed in the technical discussions here and he has very knowledgeable guests, of different faiths. Paul himself has discussed his journey in Christianity and finally to Islam.

@brt1996 Ай бұрын

Interesting video, thank you Paul

@UmaUma-vg7or Ай бұрын

A very interesting and useful content.

@wa_jih Ай бұрын

Hi, Paul! Do you plan on posting anything with regards to the Caliphate and the Roman Empire? JazakAllah Khair.

@paolobattaglia6878 Ай бұрын

AsSalamu alaykum dear brother Paul. What is the most detailed academic philology book that analyzes the lack of reliability of the New Testament, starting from Papyrus 52 up to the Codex Sinaiticus? I am looking for a text that thoroughly examines the oldest manuscripts, analyzing their variants and the implications for the fidelity of the New Testament text.

@Batochimate 24 күн бұрын

It would be great if you provide a few programs about the impacts of astrological theology on the formation of Judo-Christians and even many Islamic sects.

@ShahzadAhmad-nb6si 21 күн бұрын

No sects in Islam. Sects belongs to people not the system because of their own doings.

@SORGUN-j7m 26 күн бұрын

Ibn Mas'ud reported God's messenger as saying, “There is none of you who does not have his partner from among the jinn and his partner from among the angels put in charge of him.” The hearers asked, “Does this also apply to you, messenger of God?” He replied, “It applies to me too, but God has helped me against him and he has accepted Islam, so he commands me to do only what is good.” Muslim transmitted it. وَعَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: " مَا مِنْكُمْ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلَّا وَقَدْ وُكِّلَ بِهِ قَرِينُهُ مِنَ الْجِنِّ وَقَرِينُهُ مِنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ. قَالُوا: وَإِيَّاكَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ؟ قَالَ: وَإِيَّايَ وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَانَنِي عَلَيْهِ فَأَسْلَمَ فَلَا يَأْمُرُنِي إِلَّا بِخَيْرٍ ". رَوَاهُ مُسلم Grade: Sahīh (Zubair `Aliza'i) صَحِيح (الألباني) حكم : صحیح (زبیر علی زئی) Reference : Mishkat al-Masabih 67 In-book reference : Book 1, Hadith 61

@astikaandhini8837 Ай бұрын

This topic is cool, may Allah bless and protect you

@AbdulRahman-cv7nv Ай бұрын

Assalamu'alaikum Bro Paul. Straight to my point...WHY DO NOT MUSLIMS/REVERTS/CONVERTS write or do videos on Suratul Maidah Ayat 109-120 and viralled them on the internet? I notice very few had/have these material circulated around. In fact I would love to see those doing dakwah at the Hyde Park in London or for that matter at all debates, road side preaching etc emphasize on these verses. I reckon the impact would be very great especially the christian faith. Once they listen and understand these verses, inshaa Allah they may open up. Wallahuaklam

@DrQthehappyme-ow Ай бұрын

Good discussions indeed!

@Vancouver2010BC Ай бұрын

Dr. Shabbir Akhtar is mistaken about the variation in Quranic readings. It seems he may not be aware that these different readings were recited by the Prophet Muhammad (SAAW) himself. The Prophet confirmed that these variations were revealed to him by Jibreel. To help illustrate, the differences are similar to how English is spoken with various accents-such as Australian, South African, British, American, or African American. Additionally, in rare cases, certain words are substituted with synonyms that provide nuanced meanings, but these variations do not alter the core message. Another aspect of Quranic variation lies in the use of vowels, which are not part of the root word in Arabic but influence pronunciation. If you've noticed Arabic writing, you'll see "marks" around the letters in some texts, particularly the Quran-these are vowel symbols, as well as markers for double letters. For instance, the Arabic letter “ب” (b) can be pronounced with different vowels as “boo,” “baa,” or “bee,” and can also be doubled to “bb” (emphasizing the sound). These variations are common in the Quran, yet they were all heard directly from the Prophet (SAAW), who received them this way from Jibreel. Take Quran 1:4 as an example: the Prophet recited it with both "Mālik" (the Owner) and "Malik" (the King), both of which are revealed forms that enrich the meaning of the verse by offering complementary understandings of Allah’s role. These variations actually add depth to the message rather than confusion. All were heard from the Prophet and thus are part of the divine revelation. These variations, in fact, make it even more challenging, yet they match 100%. This is unparalleled. The discussion about variations, as mentioned by Dr. Akhtar, is misleading because these aren’t discrepancies-they are the different readings of the Prophet (SAAW) himself, and therefore, they are all part of the divine revelation. Now, imagine someone giving a five-minute speech to a large, international audience, with people from different countries around the world. After the speech, you ask the audience what the speaker said. Then, imagine letting that audience return to their home countries, and years later, you ask them again what was said. Not only that, you instruct the audience to pass the speech down to their children, and their children teach it to future generations. Centuries later, you ask each and every person, spread across different countries, what the original speaker said. Would you get a perfect match? This is for a 5 minutes speech, not hours. In the case of the Quran, not only is there an exact match in the words themselves, but also in the pronunciation, preserved through the different variations and accents. Imagine, in addition, that the speaker gave that speech in seven different dialects with variations in words that further support the message. Centuries later, the audience, spread across different countries, would not only be able to recite the speech perfectly in all its dialects and variations but also maintain the correct pronunciation with no changes whatsoever. This is precisely what happened with the Quran-millions of reciters across different regions have maintained not just the words but the exact pronunciation, down to the approved variations, as they were revealed to the Prophet (SAAW). These variations are part of the divine revelation, making the preservation of the Quran even more remarkable. Furthermore, some Muslim scholars are reluctant to discuss these variations with the public because they fear it may cause confusion. This hesitancy is reminiscent of what happened in Christian churches, and some may attempt to draw parallels. However, this mindset seems to imply that Allah and His Prophet did not care enough to prevent confusion, and that these scholars are somehow the protectors of the Quran, where Allah and His Messenger fell short!!! This line of thinking is problematic. The variations in the Quran are not mistakes or sources of confusion; they are exactly what Allah revealed to Jibreel, who then conveyed them to the Prophet (SAAW), and they serve to enrich the message. Personally, I am not fond of using the word "variations," as it implies discrepancies, which is not the case. These are precisely what Allah instructed Jibreel to deliver, and what the Prophet taught to his followers. The fact that these readings exist not only highlights the depth of the Quran but also adds a layer of challenge, further solidifying its authenticity-preserving not only the words but the exact pronunciation in every form it was revealed. Moreover, those who memorize the Quran receive an official certificate (Ijazah), confirming they were taught by a qualified teacher, who in turn was taught by their teacher, in a continuous, unbroken chain (Isnad) going all the way back to the Prophet Muhammad (SAAW). This chain of transmission is why millions of people across different countries and languages can recite the Quran exactly as it was heard from the Prophet. Even before modern technology, this oral transmission was perfectly preserved-down to the last variation in pronunciation. In conclusion, discussing the variations without this understanding is misleading because all these readings were part of the Prophet’s recitation, making them part of the revealed message.

@SAMEERSHAIKH-pb3fe Ай бұрын

May Allah bless you and give you pink of health

@oladayopopoola-e6h 3 күн бұрын

If Mr Paul were to be bashing the Muslim religion. The comment section won’t be full of Muslims praising him. He is saying what you guys wanted to hear.

@tempacc9589 Ай бұрын

Great video

@tarrazzz Ай бұрын

Fact is, the Bible is man made this vulnerable to error. God gave Jesus a revelation known as the "Gospel".

@jonahthrane812 Ай бұрын

To your argument at 20:00, "full manuscript of the bible". You cannot provide a full quran within the first 100 years either. Every other quran has a few missing verses, or was changed later to fit a more canonical ordering of the surahs. The Birmingham manuscript is two leafs. The topkapi manuscript, often claimed to be an uthmanic quran is proven by Professor Halaseh to be wrong. Its more likely to be in the 8th century than the 7th. He also concluded that pages had been added to the manuscript at a later date. It is also not 100% complete, but close. Samarkand manuscript is also not from uthman, but is most likely 8th century. And is also incomplete. And missing vocalisations, but thats not abnormal for the time. Theres apparently a very old quran in al Hussein mosque, but i cant find my scholarly information about it, so if anyone has any knowledge of studies or papers written about it then please link it to me. As far as i can tell, the oldest complete quran is the blue Qur'an. From the 9/10th century. So still 300/400 years after Muhammad. Its sad that such an intelligent man has been duped by islam. When you can see a professor and a clergyman, criticise his own bible, and still remain a clergyman, how can you not see that despite these problems we are so sure of the message of christ, that the problems are but mere curiosities to study. And remember, yes, we have few to no complete manuscripts, before very late, but there isn't a book in the world on which more textual criticism has been performed than the bible. The average Christian won't know this, sure, but for hundreds of years the bible and fragments of it has been studied, and are still studied, and we know because of this textual criticism that we can trust the bible. And remember also, that within the life time of Muhammad, Muslims had conquered and battled and won power in Arabia. Jesus and his disciples never had this same level of power. So Muhammad could have used that power to have the Qur'an written down 100% perfectly, with his stamp of approval, and then there'd be no debate, but this clearly didn't happen. Christians couldn't do this, they had little to no power, they were persecuted and killed. Paul himself as Saul killed and hunted Christians before he became a follower of Christ. So remember these things. There should be a high level of expectations for the Qur'an and its preservation, there should be a Qur'an with Muhammads 100% seal of approval, he had the power and the scribes. But he never did it. While Christians were hunted, and therefore texts were burnt and lost when they had to flee or were caught. So while there should be criticism and we should study the bible, the Qur'an should be preserved 100% somewhere in Muhammads time, that's at least my opinion, when Christians didn't have that luxury of time. I hope you all embrace Christ one day. And have a blessed day.

@neoshida 28 күн бұрын

Muslim love JC , Muhammad and all prophet peace upon them all

@jasonatreides2542 Ай бұрын

Excellent! Question why take sides on the NT canon and cite 27 books? Why not cite the 22 book NT canon or the 35 book NT canon?

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

Why copy from the least of the tradition that wasn't considered "sacred". He proved ISlam false right off the bat. Your argument is there was no sacred tradition had scriptures. Ok. Then why does your "sacred" book copy the least of those, the ones not even sacred enough to make the Bible and we're discarded

@jasonatreides2542 Ай бұрын

@@Mamba4.8 not even close. The fact that Christians can't agree on what is canon makes our position solid.

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

@@jasonatreides2542 what a loony toon. What Christian's can or can't agree on has no relevance on if the Quran is true .and if the early Christian scriptures are not sacred, why are you believing a book that copied many of the least of their scriptures that were discarded. Not to mention, a story that's told by multiply authors across time that still keeps it's narrative thread is MUCH more reliable and authentic then a book giving by a puppet war lord that plagiarized earlier text, growing out one of the fringe heretical Christian sects. I'm not a member of any religion, im a scholar of all religions, and all have interesting things. .but the Quran is the most deceptive and manipulative of all and it's followers the most deceived and simple minded. You have no archeology to back up the stories, you have no Muslims in history before 600 AD, and you have a book that's copying earlier text. Just because it's "one book by one person" doesn't make it true. I can write a book tomorrow and say it's divine, just because it's one and Christians have a few different transitions doesn't mean anything.

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

@@jasonatreides2542 Christians have nothing to do at all with your position. That's called polarization, the idea that since the opposers are wrong your right. Your just a branch that broke off Christianity, Judeo Christianity is the root you sprung from, if the root is a lie your twice the lie

@Mamba4.8 Ай бұрын

@@jasonatreides2542 you really are that dense. He said there was NO sacred scripture during Christian origins. Ok, that proves there was no Injel. It also proves your book further false because it copies from texts that were considered the least of sacred to those early Christians. So this whole video is laughable to anyone learned because while trying to prove Christianity false in his zealous manipulation he was to dim witted to realize he proved his own book even more false The things Christians disagree on with canon is because their tradition isn't held down by one authoritarian deceiver. They have a tradition that goes back 1000s of years farther back in time then you with writing's from their "prophets" and authors over those years. There's no such thing as "canon" in religion, all that means is "the dogma we like'

@arbitScaleModels Ай бұрын

But of course Greco Romans worshipped anything, so when they heard any terms like Son, Father, Divine, Holy, or any other allegorical language, it led to a complete cultural misunderstanding of Monotheism.

@jostnamane3951 Ай бұрын

The Indo-European people used "Father/Pitar" as a locutionary expression for "the originator" which in this case refers to GOD, the originator of everything that exists. But it can refer to anything that is the originator of something. For example, our ancestors are our originators because of whom our lineage is alive, those are our "Fathers" in the Indo-European locution. The famous Proto-Indo-European term "Deus Pitar" literally means "GOD Father" or "Sky Father (Source of the divine illumination)" who created the light. And from that the English term "day" and Indic terms like "din" or "divas" are derived from.

@jostnamane3951 Ай бұрын

Actually, the problem wasn't about monotheism but about locution. The Greco-Romans, because of their Indo-European origin, had the same locutionary expression to refer to GOD (the originator of everything) and other things that are the source or originator of something created. And not to mention that Indo-Europeans were pantheistic in their beliefs. So when they heard about a man named Jesus from Palestine, they thought "yeah this man is an incarnation of GOD (a Prophet in the Abrahamic locution), who received wisdom from the gods (the angels)" so the logical conclusion being the Trinity where the Father is God, the son is God and the holy spirit is also God, all being part of one God head. Similar beliefs can be found in the Vedic tradition of India, where they have their own Trinitarian depictions of their gods and all three persons are considered to be a part of one Brahman or God head.

@fab03102 Ай бұрын

Can we pressure Paul a bit to return to the previous, lower level of ads please? These 30 sec ads are such a pain in the arse and icing on the cake there's a second one after

@ARMYERS108 Ай бұрын

As a revert. I think christians who bring up the qirats forget that Muslims still have the core foundational belief in One God and that God sent prophets to give a message of monotheism. Remember 1+1+1=3.

@Marc1973Dez 9 күн бұрын

interesting argument, action and reaction. Qur'an itself originated much later and state facts / history that may had happened even before the New Testament from Christian Bible. Plus, it may have been written closer to the existence of its Prophet, but as we all know, there are so many questionable differences and mismatch takes. so ... the question is still out there.

@AnthonyDDean 27 күн бұрын

Interesting fact: prophet Hizqiyal wrote in 600 BC that Yajuj wa Majuj is Turkey and many nations of Asia Minor, and that Israel will not lose because God Himself will intervene. Interesting fact: any scholar looks at the era of the writers to understand the context. Torah predates Quran by 1,000 years, and is closer to historical truth. Old Testament survey class will teach you that Biblical and secular history align perfectly with the archeological record in the Holy Land. Does Quran have archeological record? Or is Quran a collection of Silk Road stories?

@sonarbangla8711 Ай бұрын

Chinese Christians were not at fault when they were converted and now they know even less on how they were cheated. Paul, it is on you to inform them on the false basis on which they converted. I don't know how you can do it.

@dinoraul119 Ай бұрын

Sir with due respect, Christianity has been dealt with long back. The second fastest religion after islam is hinduism. Kindly make detailed video on hinduism particularly with regards to yoga, evolution, ayurveda, vegetarianism and first cousin marriages

@kimberlyreece7950 Ай бұрын

Isn't Simon Peter the author of 1 & 2 Peter? I'm not understanding why you are saying Paul.

@williambrewer Ай бұрын

8:16 All the NT was completed by 70AD. You are wrong on this point. However, I do agree he was speaking specifically of the Old Testament scriptures like you claim. So your point is correct. However, if what Paul is saying is true then all the New Testament writings are inspired as well. But that would be a different point.

@HH-pv9ex Ай бұрын

As always, exhibiting a passion supplemented by irrefutable academically sound evidence 😊

@ماجدالنزاوي-ه9ر Ай бұрын

جزاك الله خيرا

@JupiterSky1 19 күн бұрын

God bless you

@TupacMakaveli1996 Ай бұрын

May God protects us from the apologists. They do more damage than their inclined benefit.

@faouziyassine8262 Ай бұрын

May Allah bless you

@oladayopopoola-e6h 3 күн бұрын

I don’t think Mr Paul when he was a Christian believes the name of Jesus Christ heal the sick, raise the dead, command the devil e.t.c if he is just a prophet why would his name and his name only be used . Without the Holy Spirit your knowledge of the Bible will always be limited. The reason why we fear God is because of his power and where the power of God doesn’t not manifest there is no presence of God.

@ltopomcfly5583 Ай бұрын

If you say only the Old Testament was considered holy to Christians, they would've meant the Septuagint canon and not the later Masoretic Text which Jews use.

@Kirk-d7v Ай бұрын

Dona Hafs and Warsh comparisons for us Brother Paul.

@BornToBeGoated Ай бұрын

These different forms of recitation go back to the prophet himself, peace be upon him, they only add meaning to the Quran without contradiction or lack of preservation. Alhamdulillah for Islam.

@anyq_CS Ай бұрын

assalamualaikum mr.Paul are you going to debate chrisrian apologist? when?

@anyq_CS Ай бұрын

can i send you a book?

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

Christian apologist have been trying to debate Paul for years, yet he always runs away.

@anyq_CS Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 why would he run? christianity dont make sense

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@@anyq_CS He runs because islam cannot be defended. So tell me, which Arabic version of the quran do you use and why that one? Or do you not even know that there are some 40 different versions of the Arabic quran we know of? Of course all these qurans were written by unknown authors. And how do you deal with all the mistakes, discrepancies, inconsistencies and contradictions in that quran as well as the approval of evil such as raping women who have been captures in battle (surah 33:50) which is adultery and wife beating (surah 4:34) as well as child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls. And we see that Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 year old child and then raped that child when it was just 9 years old. Clearly Mohammed disqualified himself as a prophet of GOD by the evil he perpetrated. And remember all of islam is only based what Mohammed maybe recited and how he lived. So tell me, why do you even believe that you will be with GOD our Father in heaven on judgement day when you follow Mohammed? And do show the quran verses on which you base your belief.

@anyq_CS Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688 lol copy and pasted old debunked lies on Quran popularized by david wood on internet. yawn. fastest growing religion in the west for a reason. read, study and think

@elamine9094 Ай бұрын

They would just said that paul was addressing scriptures as a whole

@Rhoda-r6j Ай бұрын

Paul, you messed up. At 4:16 you erroneously refer twice to 2 *Peter* instead of to 2 *Timothy.* . The verses you quote are, "14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, *because you know those from whom you learned it,* 15 and how *from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures,* which are able to *make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.* 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." *These verses are NOT in 2 *Peter* but in 2*Timothy* , an Epistle (ie, a *letter*) Paul wrote to the young Christian man Timothy who grew up being familiar with the Gospel message which was not only in the Gospels themselves, and since you seem to think that the message of the Gospel is only in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, *YOU ARE WRONG*. So who was Timothy? And was he familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures? Acts 16:1 says, “And he [Paul] came also to Derbe and to Lystra. A disciple was there, named Timothy, *the son of a Jewish woman* who was a believer; but his father was a Greek.” Timothy likely read the definition of the Gospel and was educated about it by older Disciples. The Gospel Message is described in other letters written to the early Church believers, such as 1 Corinthians 15:3-6, written in 55 A.D., BEFORE 2 Timothy which was written in 66 A.D. 1 Corinthians 15:3-6 states: *3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that He was buried, that He was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5 and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then He appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep.* NOTE! In verse 3 above, "Scriptures" refer to the Old Testament Law of Moses describing the necessary sacrifice of animals to atone for sins. And "Scriptures in verse 4 refers to Old Testament Scripture Psalm 16:10 “For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol, or let your holy one see corruption.” And Isaiah 53:10 Says, “10 Yet it was the Will of the Lord to crush Him; He has put Him to grief; when His soul makes an offering for guilt, He shall see His offspring; He shall prolong His days; the Will of the Lord shall prosper in His Hand.” NOTE: We are the offspring of God. 1 John 3:9 states, "Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God". The Holy Spirit is described as the seed that is planted in a person's life when they are Born-Again. The Holy Spirit gives a person eternal life, a new nature, and new desires. Paul, I don't think you ever learned what the Gospel is. I hope this helps.

@maryamali3935 Ай бұрын

I am revert 22 years ago....and have knowledge to separete bible and Quran...and what you write is christian who dont see whit your heart...but your ignorade and still dont want to see the truth..read and study Quran and you will find thst bible is corrupt

@Rhoda-r6j Ай бұрын

@@maryamali3935 I am convinced that those who are not chosen by God to be His children in Christ are hard-hearted people who intentionally fall for works-based salvation which is at the heart of all pagan, Satan-directed religions, including Islam. *I suggest you examine your heart and open it up to receive the Good News of the Gospel. Jesus died just for you,* *@maryamali3935. Without Jesus in your life, you will never spend eternity with Him Who died for you.* *Remember-- Jesus Alone was the One and Only Person Who first revealed eternal life in Heaven to us all.* *Jesus told humanity about Heaven-- NOT Muhamad or Islam's Isa or Abraham!"*

@AbelOktavian Ай бұрын

Jeremiah 8:8 How can you say, “We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us,” when, in fact, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie?

@Rhoda-r6j Ай бұрын

@@AbelOktavian The scribes are telling the people that everything is okay, that the Law is being kept, and that there will be peace because God is on their side. *It doesn't say their lying pens are making the Torah into a lie by altering the text.* If you muslims be truthful, you would know that much of the Koran is copied from Jewish and Arabian fables, folklore, & campfire stories. This has been proven over and over, but the lying pens of your "scholars" tell you they are the words of Allah. Balogna.

@rhonda8822 Ай бұрын

@@maryamali3935 John of Damascus believed Islam to be a continuation of Arianism, a heretical sect related to another earlier heretical sect, Psilanthropism. Regardless, Muhammad was inspired by a defrocked monk, Bahira, who called himself "an Arian monk". Historically, this makes sense because of the closely related beliefs in Arianism to the beliefs professed in Muhammadanism. While Psilanthropism began in the 2nd century AD, Arianism soon followed, and with several additional beliefs, Arianism grew as a result of its adoption by rulers with an iron hand. After several centuries, Arianism began to fade because of its heretical beliefs which opposed the Holy Bible. And true Biblical Christianity returned. As Arianism gasped its final breaths, Muhammad met Bahira who greatly influenced Muhammad's compilation of the Quran. From the very first story of Mary, the Quran strongly shows various Arian roots in its narrative which then continues throughout the Quran.

@Kuj0Jotar0 Ай бұрын

Can't wait for a Christian to change the topic or say it's all about "faith" and that they know their religion is right because of a dream....

@yusuf.on.youtube 28 күн бұрын

And the let it to be disconnected from the Scholars and The Followers or Christians so it would not cause more problems and questions.

@oladayopopoola-e6h 3 күн бұрын

Argument about what to include is different from saying that the words have being changed or it’s forgery. I Believe you are missing things up here.

@fatadejimoh4502 Ай бұрын

I wish Christian consider all this letter to be normal letters

@johnzuma4688 Ай бұрын

@AbelOktavian Ай бұрын

@@johnzuma4688They seek to deceive Allah and the believers, yet they only deceive themselves, but they fail to perceive it. -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 9 There is sickness in their hearts, and Allah ˹only˺ lets their sickness increase. They will suffer a painful punishment for their lies. -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 10

@mohammadraihan7735 Ай бұрын

Assalamu Alaikum sir Paul..May Almighty Allah bless you and your family .all the Muslims ummah and human mankind...

@nadaahmed-g3t Ай бұрын

The Egyptian church has now changed their minds...after hundreds of years of claiming their Bible is the word of God and was never altered, as they were confronted with the on going updates, editing, versions variations etc... they're now telling the christian so what it's updated to be modern 😂

@ft7397 Ай бұрын

12:10 the gossips

@williambrewer Ай бұрын

25:10 which unique version of the Quran has enjoyed universal currency? How many different Arabic versions of the Quran are there?

@Ismail-014 23 күн бұрын

One only

@Ritika-p4l Ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤from kolkata

@raycrossley5398 15 күн бұрын

I cant believe it your right Muhammad is in the bible In peter 2: 1-3 But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them-bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2 Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. 3 In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.

@Adil_Chaugule Ай бұрын

Assalamualaikum Paul, can you call zakir naik on your podcast

@DaTruth1017 Ай бұрын

Why should Paul have a *medical doctor* (Dr. Z Naik) on podcast when able to have an Islamic scholar such as *Sayed Mohammed Baqer al-Qazwini?*

@olivia1uk 9 күн бұрын

Do Muslims believe in the tetragrammaton? God's name. Do they believe in the God of the Hebrew bible? The same God as Moses? And if so why do they believe in the immortal soul and hellfire?