Quran

[@minnyjay4332]

Jami' al Tarmidi 101 references the prophet wearing a khimar. Not sure why men are not obligated to wear it as well. In addition, it would be great to know how women in that time actually wore the garnment..so for more accurate reference. Sheikh Shabir is amazing and so is Sufiya. Thank you.

[@HitherandYarn]

I want to check this out. If the Prophet wore a khimar, I don't think it was to guard his modesty. Maybe it was just the custom because of the sun, heat, bugs, sand, and identity, etc. So then a woman wearing a khimar wasn't doing it to guard her modesty either, but it was a practical custom. So, it would really all be about covering the chest, not the hair. Today, we have buttons, zippers, and different cuts of clothes to keep the chest covered.

[@minnyjay4332]

@@HitherandYarn the argument made by many other scholars is that the mere mention of "khimar" in Q24:31 makes it mandatory/compulsory. Yet, here in this hadith and many others, the prophet is specifically said to wear khimar, yet this logic doesn't apply to men. We know the prophet himself wore khimar. You would think it would be mandatory for men to wear it instead of women because of this, but not the case.

[@minnyjay4332]

@@HitherandYarn BilaI narrated: "The Prophet wiped over the Khuff and the Khimar." حَدَّثَنَا هَنَّادٌ، حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُسْهِرٍ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنِ الْحَكَمِ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَى، عَنْ كَعْبِ بْنِ عُجْرَةَ، عَنْ بِلاَلٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم مَسَحَ عَلَى الْخُفَّيْنِ وَالْخِمَارِ ‏.‏ Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 101 In-book reference : Book 1, Hadith 101 English translation : Vol. 1, Book 1, Hadith 101

[@HitherandYarn]

@@minnyjay4332 THANK YOU.

[@mfnewt]

May Allah bless you Shabir Ally brother and safiya alli sister for beautiful work of spreading knowledge of Allah and put you into the best place in jannat.Amin 😐

[@80lala08]

wrong emoji is it? but beautiful words

[@jubairahmed6386]

Although most of the classical commentators interpreted "what normally appears" as face & hands, Sheikh Ul Islam Ibn Ashur mentioned in this tafsir that a group of Mufassireen (probably a minority) also included hair in their interpretations. [When it came to slave women however, majority of the classical scholars allowed them to be bare headed]

[@kanizfatima3447]

True

[@autumnleaf7953]

This episode was too short in my opinion. He should have discussed this verse in more detail.

[@haroon420]

If you understand Urdu and have the time, listen to Dr. Ghamidi and his 23questions series about the hijab.

[@autumnleaf7953]

@@haroon420 I have already watched Javed Ghamidi's hijab series. Although I don't understand Urdu very well, those videos have English subtitles so it wasn’t a problem to understand. It's an amazing series

[@ProLookout]

Alhamdulillah for the clarity

[@nabailirshad8476]

Salam Dr. If khimar in the Quran is used in its technical sense, does that mean Allah wants all women to cover their hair along with their chest or only cover their chest and wear modest clothes?

[@laylaali5977]

Excellent program

[@dantelm2366]

Draw head cover over bossom, please explain in more detail if possible why this means you must also keep hair covered? I understand women covered their hair those days but not all women covered their hair all the time I am sure not even then, because ppl can be a bit lax sometimes And what about women who never covered their hair because of their culture or countey Shouldn't this rule be more explicit in the quran , it easily could have stated cover your hair and your bosom. But hair is never mentioned. Gr8 vid tho but would things to be a bit more thorough. Thank you 😬

[@autumnleaf7953]

In his older hijab videos he said that covering hair isn't necessary

[@dantelm2366]

@@autumnleaf7953 I have looked up the vids up and found them very useful. Thanks!

[@ebrahim9583]

Hair is not needed to be mentioned explicitly because by using the word 'headcover', implies that is what should be worn, otherwise if it was to include those who didn't wear a head-covering, then the verse could have simply stated 'to cover one's chest', without using the word 'headcover'. Perhaps the wording is specific in using an implied meaning, so as to test one's observance. On the authority of Abu 'Abdullah al-Nu'man bin Bashir (ra) who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (sas) say: "The halal is clear and the haram is clear, and between them are matters unclear that are unknown to most people. Whoever is wary of these unclear matters has absolved his religion and honor. And whoever indulges in them has indulged in the haram. It is like a shepherd who herds his sheep too close to a preserved sanctuary, and they will eventually graze in it. Every king has a sanctuary, and the sanctuary of Allah is what He has made haram. There lies within the body a piece of flesh. If it is sound, the whole body is sound; and if it is corrupted, the whole body is corrupted. Verily this piece is the heart." [Bukhari & Muslim]

[@bensukilci3892]

As he mentioned some concepts are already widely accepted by the community of the day and ppl knew the terminology. It is not necessary to say handcover or use the word ‘hand’ when you say ‘gloves’ for example. People know whats gloves covering. Same for khimar, this is a piece of cloth already in use of covering the head and God extends that concept by commanding draw it over your bosom. Khimar word comes from the same origin of alcohol which covers the intellect (head basically) .Companions of Muhammed pbuh practiced this as instructed and it is a significant part of modest dressing. Honestly I never had doubt about the necessity of headcover for women considering how hair is so sifnificantly attractive part of women beauty. But I understand the questions arise for further information as well. May Allah guides us all and keep us righteous ones❤

[@haroon420]

He will get to it, he’s doing a whole series and this is just the second episode. If you understand Urdu, listen to Ghamidi and his 23questions series on the hijab.

[@kausarabdulwahab3907]

Salamun Alaykum Shouldn't the Quran explain itself why do we have to go outside the Quran to find the meaning of any word in the book while it clearly says in the Quran that it explains everything.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

That's the reason why Allah sent prophets to us human.. to deliver His teachings and become an example on how to practice His teachings.. Because Allah know us human don't have the capability to grasp the wisdom of God.. so there you got prophets, choosen peoples amongst numerous humans..

[@tt_here]

The Qur’an is comprised of universals and particulars. What do I mean? For instance, the matter of inheritance is a particular matter since the Qur’an explicitly states the conditions and all they entail. Same applies to the clearly established conditions of marriage, etc. The matter of hijab, which of course isn’t one of the pillars of Islam, is a universal matter left for interpretation depending on the realities it is to be lived in. The universal message of it is modesty; a society with the help of the best trained jurists are to discern what such and such matter means in various times and how it is to be applied.

[@byip2415]

Why did it take Allah thousands years to finally get the dress code for women right?? Common sense would dictate that humans should dress appropriately for the weather and environmental conditions.

[@ebrahim9583]

How much simpler understanding the Quran would be through hadith. ibn Abbas - a giant of Quran exegesis, the one for whom the Prophet made special dua for his understanding of the Quran - said that this verse meant that everything should be covered except the hands and face. Allah knows best

[@StevenMiller]

He is a sly hadith rejector so he constantly ignores this advice

[@Susanbeing]

I wear it sometimes even alone silly ?? I have baby hair 😢

[@Natalie-fj7fs]

Before Islam why were women covering their hair?

[@jubairahmed6386]

Because tradition & social customs? Even men used to wore turbans

[@CintAAllah22]

Doesn't matter. What matters is that Allah SWT has commanded females to cover themselves, including their hair. The only difference in the opinions of scholars is about the obligation of covering the face or not. Don't listen to this clown Shabir who wants to lead people out from Islam.

[@Natalie-fj7fs]

@@jubairahmed6386 exactly! It has nothing to do with religion.

[@MoyaG]

Because of tough weather you know word "khemar" used for both men and women means head cover and both used to cover their heads for protection

[@Chaos_personified.]

​@@CintAAllah22in which verse????!

[@Aishaharuna-r5k]

Please can i wear cloths that are beautiful and shiny provided my whole body is covered and it is loose

[@bf6724]

Suddenly, non-Muslims became more concerned with what Islamic texts mean, especially the issue of hijab, even more than Muslims!! Everyone wants to remove dress and modesty from Muslim women!!! There is a saying: An adulteress wishes all women were adulterers.

[@dantelm2366]

Can ppl stop playing the victim all the time, its a bit embarrassing. I know the Muslim community has faced a lot of hardship but so have many others . Diffrent opinions is not an attack or a threat to anyone just disagree...and move on.

[@bf6724]

@@dantelm2366 Allah commanded us not to remain silent about falsehood, with our hands if we are not able with our tongues if we are not able with our hearts. And it still does to the day of Judgment, the only religion today that stands in the face of liberalism is Islam. When I say the only religion I mean literally all the other religions have been crushed, manipulated by liberalism and secularism as they wish by imposing a fait accompli. It is not just about a difference in opinions. Just look at fiqh you will find millions of works that were written during the past fourteen centuries. You will find yourself in the middle of a sea of ​​opinions and differences no one objected. On the contrary, it considers healthy. In fiqh, differ as you wish, but what is happening here is demolition of the foundation, demolition of the creed, and an attempt to build a new religion that they can direct as they wish.

[@mjp-bi3re]

I am a big fan of this channel. Please explain how Muhammad and his companions were allowed to have right hand possessions, which I have learned are female slaves that were used for sex. Additionally, how is the "pleasure marriage" or nikah mutah any different from prostitution? Most people, self included, do not understand these aspects of Islam and I would very much appreciate clarity. I look forward to the next episode as I do every episode. Blessings.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

You can have intimate relation with your slqves.. what's wrong with that? The problem is if you neglect their rights.. slqves in islam can even become the army's commander on battlefield.. Nikah mut'ah is only for the time of fattul makkah, it was forbiden after that by the prophet (saw).. those who are still allowing it, is arguably not even practicing islam, because they deliberately against the warning of the prophet (saw).. To be a muslim is to follow 2 guide books, The Qur'an and sahih hadith.. ignore one and you would get lost..

[@mjp-bi3re]

@@nu-nisamiracle2401 So, if I understand, Muhammad and his companions, who were moslty married men, were allowed to have physical relations with their slave women. That sounds highly sexually driven. You state that it was permissible so long as the rights of the slave women were give , but it must have been psychologically damaging to the wives of those women whose husbands essentially lacked self restraint. If possible, guide me towards understanding how this was reasonable. Blessings.

[@Hayaaaasd]

@@mjp-bi3re exactly- i was wondering the same thing as this is essentially non consensual sexual activity, especially if slave women had no rights. It makes me uneasy to think about this so clarification from him would be great.

[@mustakimmustafa5429]

Guys do you think a merciful God would allowed such injustice to His servants?

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

@@Hayaaaasd ☝️🙄

[@ivanos_95]

We also have a similar tradition in Orthodox-Christianity, because we consider woman's hair as woman's pride/sign of social status, so our women are obligated to cover their hair when entering a church, as a sign of respect towards the priests and the holy place in general, but in our tradition the head-covering have nothing to do with sexuality, while in case of Islam, the hijab is basically a light/reformed version of the niqab, and was forced upon the women in order to protect the men from sexual urge, because Islam have no emphasis on self-control, so the hijab is nothing else, but a symbol of sexual objectification.

[@ebrahim9583]

The verse speaks of using the headscarf to cover the bosom - the covering of the head isn't necessarily for sexual modesty as that part of the verse, speaks of guarding one's beauty in general. Sometimes we must be careful not to infer and apply a singular understanding to the entire verse because of the understanding conveyed in another part of the same verse which was referring to their bosoms. "because Islam have no emphasis on self-control" - that is patently false. In that very same chapter, Surah Nur, there's a verse instructing both men and women to lower their gaze. This is in conjunction with a variety of verses and Prophetic narrations that encourage marriage and fasting to control sexual desire. One should be mindful of speech - "And who is more unjust than one who invents about God a lie." (11:18)

[@ebrahim9583]

P.S. Women cover their hair in Orthodox Christianity, not because of the Priesthood, but simply because it is a dishonor to God, so Biblical scripture prescribes for women to cover their head when they pray. 1 Corinthians 11

[@ivanos_95]

@@ebrahim9583 There would be no problem if the covering was limited to the hair, but the following verses are clarifying that the general point of covering is all about the sexual attraction, and the single fact that Islam is forcing the women to cover themselves for sexual reasons, goes against the emphasis on self-control in this particular case. Sure, the tradition of hair-covering for the women, or uncovering in case of the men is extended to personal prayer as well, but this tradition is focused primarily on the church/holy place, not directly on the relation with God. Anyway, my point was that the Islamic tradition of covering outside the sexual organs is not about the social status, like it's in case of Christianity, but only about the sexual urge of the men, and it's a sign that the women in Islam are treated primarily as sexual objects.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

@@ivanos_95 bro, according to jesus, even if you only imagining someone else's body shape in your imagination, you already commited sin.. we covering the woman from top to the bottom so no one can even imagining their body shape in their imagination.. It's a precaution against sins.. We only following what jesus teach.. what's wrong with that? 😑

[@ivanos_95]

@@nu-nisamiracle2401 We have a concept of impure thought, but only when a man looks at other mans wife, or unmarried woman with an intent to have a sexual relation with her, absolutely not in case of admiring one's beauty. The problem is, that forcing a woman to cover herself for sexual reasons, instead of working on own self-control, is basically treating a woman as sexual object. We deal with this problem by working on self-control, in order to avoid treating a woman as sexual object in the first place.

[@absycraftsmore8834]

Khimar means cloth to cover bossoms but men we’re writing hadith so they created or assume anything. That is why in today’s world we are facing such much of controversy and problems in society for women. Quran was simple in its instructions but some humans thought let’s protect our women by inserting & making little changes. When we play with Allah ‘s words and meanings for our benefit then that’s where the fitna arises only to test us with what we tried changing and thinking it would be beneficial but unfortunately no one can see ahead and no one knows the times how it will change except Allah. And now our sister daughter’s and wife , mothers are experiencing danger in this society being harmed only bcoz humans thought to add something that is better in hadith. Quran is simple and clear. Similarly Age of Hazrat Ayesha was controversial also . It’s time we question the authenticity of hadith over dajjal over iman mehdi . So what ever humans did which wasn’t mentioned in Quran created fitna in this society.

[@NRFP]

Why slave women have no rights for wear hijab to protect from evil? why omer(r)beat then for wear hijab?why they treat like as product! why hijab is only for only free muslim women?why not for slave women. they are not human. its double standard. sorry for bad english

[@jubairahmed6386]

He will talk about this in the upcoming episodes hopefully

[@tausif3k]

And yet the Prophet is said to have said: "Feed them with whatever you feed yourself & clothe them with whatever you wear yourself"... fabricated hadiths are a curse to Islam. Umar also said: Hasbuna Kitab Allah, God's book is sufficient for us. Quran judges the hadith, not the other way around.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

Where did you get that? 😑

[@NRFP]

Dr. Shabbir ally make video about it. please check..also there are many hadithwhich sheik nasiruddin albani say authentic. sorry for bad english

[@NRFP]

Dr. Shabbir ally make video about it. please check..also there are many hadithwhich sheik nasiruddin albani say authentic. sorry for bad english

[@kalib2769]

Is it permissible to be friends with someone of the opposite gender? Pls answer

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

Why is it not? 😑

[@randy4443]

Its not permissible

[@ewnetu4813]

إن ذيس حجاب إن إثيوبيا هاف أنظر منينج بيوت إن يور كاس تك أس مرج عربس سكسيل وكنس إن ثم فورم ث إنفلف طه بروتست أن لست ص أن من عند أن ومن مرج طه بي عند فمك فاميلي مبر سلكتد فور سبس حرام عليكم يو هاف جود جاف يو أسست طه شر فور يور كند ماري فور لف أوت سيد فار أوي عجزي

[@Hamza000h]

❤️

[@matthewbardos4424]

You know, the omnipotent creator of the cosmos (who cares about sexist human dress codes apparently), could just appear before us and explain what he/it wants. But that would be too simple and make too much sense I guess.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

Bro, what do you think God is? 😑 God is not like an object that float on space.. 🤦 What you say is the definition of incarnation.. and incarnation is defiying the definition of infinite.. and God is infinite by definition..

[@matthewbardos4424]

@@nu-nisamiracle2401 I assume you are the believer, so you define it. Can you? And yes, have read the Quran, Muhammed literally MEETS WITH Allah during the Mi'raj.

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

@@matthewbardos4424 no? 😑 Prophet muhammad (saw) meet Allah and have conversation, yes that's true according The Qur'an and hadith.. But not in the sense like he is talking face to face with a person on space.. It's also explained in the hadith, when one of the companion ask him what does Allah looked like.. What he could see is only the hijab of Allah.. the shroud.. shroud in a sense that you cannot even able to precieve what is beyond that.. You could say he is standing just at the end of the final dimension of any existence.. Btw fyi, according to The Qur'an, our entire known universe with stars in it is still under the 1st sky.. and there are 7 layers of it.. above that is the frontier, the fog, the sea, the throne, and at last The God.. And the size comparison for every lower layer and the upper layer above it is like a single grain of sand to the whole desert.. Fun thing, nowhere It's saying that our universe, our dimension, is the only 1st sky.. So there is a possibility that any other 1st sky, or other universe, or other dimension, exist just like ours..

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

@@matthewbardos4424 well yeah, we can define God.. anyone can.. God is just a brand, or name, in english, which we label the definition of something which created our reality of time and space.. If that something created the time and space, which was the basis of our own existence, means that something should be infinite, eternal, singular, and sentient.. Because that something should be something which doesn't get restricted with the law of time and space itself.. And if it's something infinite, means it can't be split, have any part, or have a shape like an object.. So, no, God is not something like an object that float on space..

[@matthewbardos4424]

@@nu-nisamiracle2401 1) So you are saying that you are unable to define the deity that you yourself worship? So do you even understand what you believe in? 2) Ok, so you believe Allah talked to Muhammed. Good, so now why doesn't he talk to the rest of us?

[@abdulsudaisy]

People trying so hard to discard what Islam has prescribed of hijab. Muslims for that matter. Disgusting.

[@Hayaaaasd]

Or people use their rationale and brains to dissect each teaching. Allah himself said “do not follow blindly what you do not know to be true”. Use your own knowledge and understanding to learn, dont just follow others blindly without even asking questions

[@abdulsudaisy]

@@Hayaaaasd when the Quranic texts are plain and clear about a commandment and people start to debate on it then that just shows how hypocritical they are with the commandments of Allah. If the pious predecessors never debated about these plain commandments and now these so called “woke” Muslims try to give them a totally different explanation that is self explanatory that they are leading to misguidance.

[@Hayaaaasd]

@@abdulsudaisy but it is literally a widely known interpretation that hijab is not mandatory so why are you acting arrogant

[@abdulsudaisy]

@@Hayaaaasd lols that’s really false. Crazy to even think of that.

[@Hayaaaasd]

@@abdulsudaisy may Allah guide you

[@youdontneedtoknowmyname1632]

Jesus is God

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

How can jesus be God if God is infinite? 😑

[@mohamedaydarus7418]

You believe Jesus was crucified… how is God crucified and be eternal at the same time? Not making sense…

[@nu-nisamiracle2401]

@@mohamedaydarus7418 they would say because only the mortal body is deqd and continue with spiritual npnsense.. The problem is, trinity is against the definition of infinite itself.. in any means of definitions..

[@mentalismification]

Jesus (God's peace and mercy upon him) will deny any association to such claim on the Day of Judgment. He'll come clean of such fallacies in front of His Creator. - You should, too.