Rachmaninoff: Moments Musicaux, Op.16 (Litvintseva, Giltburg)

[@TempodiPiano]

Number 3 is all my life. I have played it hundreds of times.

[@TempodiPiano]

I can't weep anymore for so much suffuring but my heart is upset.

[@torusx8564]

@rl Probably the most expressive but I like all of them.

[@ludimagister-2005]

Number 6

[@aidan4624]

You must have big hands

[@remedyszn]

@@aidan4624 i like playing this one as my hands are perfectly sized for the chords 😭

[@niccolopaganini4268]

This time with the description added. I'm glad to finally see your speciality, the rich analyses, on this particular set of pieces

[@jesika7869]

Amazing to think Rachmaninoff was only 23 when he composed these. The Russians of that era were so much better educated in music.

[@wholemilky]

I love no. 1 so much, the melody is immensely haunting, yet incredibly beautiful.

[@hai-mel6815]

I love your profile pic

[@wholemilky]

@@hai-mel6815 I love you

[@DemirSezer]

@@wholemilky i love you more

[@wholemilky]

@@DemirSezer i love you too man

[@wholemilky]

@Shostacovid i love you more than most

[@msurocks1973]

The rest at 19:56 I always find so awesome for some reason. So short yet so sweet and adds to the furiouso dramatic effect.

[@j.vonhogen9650]

Besides awesome, it's also convenient, because it gives you time to prepare for the LH/RH jump which has to be 100% accurate with a perfectly timed sustain pedal on the first beat of the next bar.

[@byugoi]

4:35 - 5:00 so unbelievably beautiful

[@butterflysoup7699]

Listen to Ashkenazy’s version of it. He brings out the melody in this section and a little less rushed. It sounds so much more atmospheric

[@byugoi]

@@butterflysoup7699 I listened to his version, I like it too, how he takes it slowly. The main thing I really like about this section is the chord progression or whatever you might call it in the left hand. It sounds very dramatic, and I wish it went on for longer instead of just ending by going up a long scale to the high notes.

[@vedantdave9778]

Number 6 is unbelievably beautiful

[@SpaceMalakhi]

The number 3 makes my heart melt

[@nghiavan8952]

Number 4 makes my heart burn

[@ЕленаШатравка-ц5з]

@@nghiavan8952, yep😊

[@erikfreitas7093]

It makes my heart ache … the passionate melancholy is almost too much to bear

[@alexhoffmann9648]

The descending chromatic notes starting at 1:30 never fail to give me goosebumps.

[@timward276]

Prestissimo and ffff at the end of no. 4. Yeah, Rachmaninoff is showing off a bit, perhaps for those who thought the Revolutionary Etude's left hand was too easy. Then we get no. 5, just about the most beautiful damn thing Rach ever wrote. Great stuff.

[@tommysmyth1210]

I personally think revolutionary etude is more difficult in the left hand than that spot, since it is not the hardest at all.

[@pavlosgermanidis2754]

try chopin-godowsky revolutionary etude for the left hand only: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqaokmSOgaqJidk

[@gramywewszystko7244]

Revolutionary etude is much harder for left hand. This particular no.4 Moment is really well written for pianists to play. Really comfortable, like most of Rachmaninov's works

[@Kinjutsuu]

@@gramywewszystko7244 say that to small hand pianists. also the whole third mvt of Rach3 is screamingly awkward

[@gramywewszystko7244]

@@Kinjutsuu Rach3 is one of the most difficult pieces ever. For me, as a big hand pianist, the 4th moment is not as difficult as revolutionaty etude, but it might be difficult for someone with small hands. My friend tried to play this, and failed completly because she couldn't reach so far. And i also find Rach3 3rd movement akward, it's just soooooo difficult. So mamy melodies to bring out, but sooo many notes to play beside them.

[@f.p.2010]

The 6th is so amazing, like each chord is a step to salvation...

[@marsaeolus9248]

mmh I prefer the Gavrilov version, you must listen to it ! Litvintseva and Giltburg play it too slow

[@kwkarlwang]

Gio2.0 mmh I prefer lugansky version, you must listen to it! Gavrilov plays it too fast

[@JpointA]

I personally prefer Beatrice Magnani for this one.

[@thenameisgsarci]

Too bad, your hands have to go through hell to play that. XD

[@f.p.2010]

@@thenameisgsarci why play when you can listen (also big thank you to you, you introduced me to these pieces)

[@steelpirzag1919]

The one time the Rach decides to go easy on us with C major he can't help but jam pack a record number of 32nd notes in.

[@randykern1842]

Number 5 is quite an enigma. Rachmaninoff rarely displays such restraint

[@trevjr]

Since my youth I have always been a Scriabinist, but lately I am really appreciating Rachmaninoff. I have always liked his music but now I am really enjoying it. There are parts where if you played them for me isolated I would assume it was Scriabin. I love how these two classmates went their different ways but in another sense, stayed so close to each other.

[@MagicDonDino]

Thanks for this! I'm very impressed by the Giltburg's left hand on moment no 4, so original and intelligent solution.

[@s1nd3rr0z3]

Litvintseva's no 4 was extremely refreshing just from the opening notes, I had previously thought Lugansky's to be the best, however much I still enjoy his frantic passionate energy, but I was extremely pleasantly surprised by Litvintseva's more reflective interpretation.

[@СергейЛовцов-ъ2э]

for me Lugansky is still the best

[@s1nd3rr0z3]

@@СергейЛовцов-ъ2э Yeah fair, I think it's gonna be pretty hard for anyone to ever top that performance

[@utsteinproductions]

Used to be able to play the fourth one. It's a hell of a piece to learn due to the left hand, but man is it rewarding once you get it down.

[@jf2602]

Starting from 1:32, the falling cadence at the bottom of the right hand just took my breath away every time.

[@benrolfe8490]

I'm struggling to think of a more poignantly effective use of a chromatic inner voice and I'm coming up short

[@unnamed7225]

The title translates to musical moments That is exactly what I am having right now

[@nghiavan8952]

For No. 4, it’s more like a heart attack moment

[@mysticalmagic6172]

Playing No 1 right now, easily one of the best and most dramatic pieces I’ve played before.

[@letiziaesophias8780]

Rachmaninov 's Musical moment n.5 remembers the Intermezzo from the 3rd Piano Concerto. And the beginning of the n 6 is similar to the 2nd Prelude op. 23. But it is also similar to a moment of the 2nd Rachmaninoff's Piano Concerto, during the last movement.

[@Highlander1432]

Thank you so much for these videos! I appreciate your hard work and time. :)

[@APotatoWT]

No.6 is out of this world

[@alfredbeadman6404]

Loved the description!

[@thenameisgsarci]

i dunno if i have commented here before, but thank you for bringing this one back. :)

[@collinm.4652]

Did it disappear??

[@thenameisgsarci]

@@collinm.4652 yes. i mean to say, my score vid of it was struck down.

[@collinm.4652]

@@thenameisgsarci oof that sucks . Sorry to hear :(

[@likjhu625]

This sounds so romantic. I love the score❤

[@mangomerkel2005]

From 5:20 ist just amazing... yet again, a typical Rachmaninoff-moment at the turn to Gb-minor on 5:27, it is just perfect! 34:29 It makes me cry... Happy 150th, Rach!

[@davidrehak3539]

Szergej Rachmaninov:Hat “Moment Musical” Op.16 1.Andantino (b-moll) 00:00 2.Allegro (esz-moll) 06:55 3.Andante cantabile (b-moll) 10:05 4.Presto (e-moll) 17:26 5.Adagio sostenuto 20:37 6.Maestoso (C-dúr) 24:32 Ekaterina Litvintseva-zongora

[@hannah-yi2su]

Adoro el final del adantino, pieza número 1, 6:17 - 6:40, dejo esto aquí para acordarme y escucharlo otra vez. 10:06 andante cantabile, precioso 17:26 - No.4, Presto, E min

[@Crankkooo]

If I remember correctly Rachmaninoff wrote these masterpieces in a very short amount of time, because he was short on money and needed some income. Correct me if im wrong though.

[@thenameisgsarci]

Not a good experience, but still, to be able to compose this... You can't help it but admire his genius.

[@preblalar8798]

@@charles-valentinalkan5681 Don't you just hate when that happens and you need to get money for the conductor FAST...

[@BryanHo]

@@charles-valentinalkan5681 Then we are forever indebted to the thief!

[@malmsteengreece]

Where did you read it? Is there a biography to buy?

[@tarikeld11]

31:52 almost the lick

[@mr.p5446]

Oh man. Number 1 shared ideas with Rach 3. That’s nice

[@purplerita8436]

You know I really can't decide which version of the No.4 I like more. I like how Giltburg plays the passages and like Litvintseva plays the mellody. A mix of both would be nice.

[@Nystrom292]

Masterpiece!!

[@Franz_Liszt_Korean]

Rachmaninoff, you are a genius

[@rachguy]

agree no 2 4 6 are so good

[@yuehchopin]

danke für die Sendung

[@smb123211]

Incredibly impressive...until No 6. Once you've heard Lugansky nothing else compares (at least for the last one). He manages to do what Rachmaninoff so treasured - bringing out all those contrapuntal inner melodies. Still, an exalted performance and a kudos for presenting / aligning the music.

[@erenoz2910]

it's a shame how no. 5 is buried in between the more frantic and exciting moments. it feels like a nice break point, an eye of the storm that is rachmaninov

[@forta7353]

Nikolai Lugansky: Am I a Joke to you?

[@flyingpenandpaper6119]

Yeah, I was surprised too. Judging by previous videos, I would have judged that he was Ashish's favourite interpreter of Rachmaninoff. But listening now, I think I understand.

[@AshishXiangyiKumar]

@@flyingpenandpaper6119 I don't have (or try very hard not to have) "favourite interpreters", just people who happen to have produced particularly good recordings. I get the feeling that the moment you have a favourite pianist, you start closing your mind off to all the other great stuff happening out there (much like those unfortunate people who cannot help but comment that they prefer Barenboim on every other Beethoven sonata video). And yes! If you listen to these it'll be very clear why they are some of my favourite Rach recordings.

[@flyingpenandpaper6119]

@@AshishXiangyiKumar I agree, every interpretation has the potential to be special in its own way. Although, by favourite, I meant more that, on average, you found more of his interpretations appealing. Personally, I almost always find Lugansky's interpretations logical (if a little safe) and technically flawless-which is why I always look for his name when searching for a new piece.

[@emrekaplan5569]

@@donquixote8133 giltburg is a good substitute for lugansky in that tbh. it would be a bit redundant to have both of them

[@thenameisgsarci]

@@AshishXiangyiKumar I agree with this kind of logic. :)

[@isaacvandermerwe744]

4:00 when Rachmaninoff Chopins better than Chopin

[@miguelisaurusbruh1158]

I'd say that's more of a Lizt

[@almscurium]

@@miguelisaurusbruh1158I wouldn’t

[@msthing]

OMG the beauty brings a tear to my eye. I wonder if non-russians perceive it the same way, but somehow it speaks to some ancient part of my DNA...

[@user-rd6vf7xk1x]

That Eb min allegro is pretty wild, anyone else notice some fragmented similarities to Ravels Ondine? Maybe I’m just imagining it

[@AeenJabbarizadeh]

The best I've heard from Rachmaninoff was Italian polka Then, After That I Loved "Six Moments Musicaux" From Rachmaninoff

[@marcsmith7789]

That first one is so refined and the harmonies so lovely and subtle I thought I was listening to Faure at first. What a wonderful set.

[@ОленаСьомка-е6ю]

Listening to Moments Musicaux, in my opinion, requires some tuning to the perception of this ingenious music; but no matter how much I listen, I always want to praise everyone with delight - Rachmaninoff, the performers, you, Ashish​ - again and again 👍, why can this be done only once? what a pity)

[@dscasg4596]

Currently practicing the 4th,this just never ceases to inspire me. Good work!😀

[@Luca-yg5qx]

Is this Winter Wind on your profile picture or am I wrong?

[@dscasg4596]

You are right!

[@cinimod621]

Thank you

[@mohammadhamzahidris5319]

Why did not you insert Pogorelich Interpretation? it is very interesting ... and before everything thank you very much for your very beautiful work

[@MegaCirse]

Perfect songs to read the subjective forms of the clouds and to follow with a tender eye the grooves of the stems of the trees; appreciate the complex writing of the nested branches, taste the colors of the decomposition of light into water droplets in a garden, and strongly feel the wet soil of ancestral forest to perceive the traces of animals from deep past 🍍

[@cp0bo593]

4:01 genius

[@LukeZX4]

Poor No. 5. A sweet, lilting little thing, sandwiched between two titans. It is my personal favorite in this set and at least deserves more recognition as an amateur student piece. It's approachable enough as both listener and player, so maybe it's just boring? Quite tragic.

[@benrolfe8490]

No. 5 is my personal favorite in the entire set, and one of the most beautiful things Rach ever wrote, in my opinion. It really is done a bit of a disservice when placed between 4 and 6...

[@yanzhuozhoo]

THIS IS A FUCKING MASTERPIECE

[@chasegamerv1573]

The second piece is underrated I think. Let alone the piece is in E Flat Minor (which is not fun to read or play), its also one of the fastes pieces. Number 4 may be hard in one hand, but number 2 is a sight reading nightmare for me.

[@MaestroPuffin]

Nothing prepared me for the climax of No. 2 8:38

[@solighandhi5551]

Love your videos. I was wondering if you would consider doing Beethoven's piano concertos? Whether you do or not, thank you for what you do and I look forward to more that you will post.

[@luizmelofilho]

Don't tell me you stopped with the videos!!!!!

[@hubertchan2251]

Luiz Melo Haha he has just posted a new one!!

[@adriancameron8665]

Whats good about these pieces is that Nos. 3 and 5 can be learned by someone with intermediate technical skill (grade 6).

[@randomcubing7106]

Rachmaninoff LOVES polyrhythm

[@TempodiPiano]

I enjoy playing the n°5 moderato/allegro.

[@MertCalkan]

Special pieces of Rachmaninov

[@miguelisaurusbruh1158]

20:06 HOLY SHIT FORTISISISISISIMO

[@sethjeppson5680]

Its like ffff for all of no 6

[@felipemp93]

Ashish, out of pure curiosity from a huge fan of your videos: what is your favorite Mahler's symphony?

[@AshishXiangyiKumar]

felipemp93 9th, or the 7th on some days. The latter is really underappreciated.

[@DanielKRui]

@@AshishXiangyiKumar on the topic of symphonies, how do you think Rachmaninoff's hold up? Some of the academic types claim that they (perhaps the 2nd symphony in particular) are too muddy and boring (compared to the work of say, Mahler, Strauss, and Ravel), though I find those views to be quite uncharitable, and maybe even a bit snobbish.

[@성이름-l1y2m]

1:07 that left hand

[@смертьшпионам-ъ4ю]

Bravo ! Grandioso !

[@gabrielepetrucci1081]

04:02 10:05 12:43

[@DreamlessSleepwalker]

Upload Alban Berg's works!

[@josephalvarez5315]

I don't know if you take requests, but I hope you consider Debussy's etudes. I think you might have had them up before, but they probably got taken down. Obviously it's understandable if you don't, love your channel and watch it every day. Thank you for your hard work

[@chocolatechipbleach8341]

17:20

[@benoitsarels3776]

Hi ashish! Love your channel. Do you know of a similar channel, more related to opera?

[@draensham]

Lohengrin O

[@DerekLowePianist]

No. 2 is at 6:53 not 7:53 by the way

[@saikitng1295]

Is it just me, or does Rachmaninoff’s moment musicaux No 3 remind me of Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No.5, 2nd movement???

[@authenticbaguette6673]

I don't know who Litvintseva is , but that nocturne in the beginning was just stunningly beautiful ! This piece usually sounds lethargic to me , but this interpretation did not ..

[@claudioparrella183]

sono d'accordo

[@RicAbapo]

No. 6 is so Bortkiewicz.

[@jungwirthmartin]

Ok, here is the link for the best version ever recorded by great Lugansky kzbin.info/www/bejne/iHqQnmaQaL6bnbs

[@pataponchik3]

Музыкальные моменты...

[@mspiano1]

Good playing, but I think in the 1st piece there are a few places where the rhythm is not right.

[@clairerobsin]

My only criticism of this video is THAT: 1, 2 and 3 do not follow 4, 5 and 6 - 7, 8 and 9 do but I suppose we'll just have to make do :O)

[@PieInTheSky9]

No. 2 is at 6:53 not 7:53 (in the youtube playlist timestamp)

[@paolo6219]

Yeah 4 is good but 2 is literally in Eb minor it's incomparable

[@ripvanwinkle9592]

I love Eь minor for piano music. My favorite of Rachmaninoff's pisno pieces in Eь minor is his beautiful élegie in Eь minor, Op.3. Richarc Sot Facebook & Messenger.

[@paolo6219]

@Franz Schubert frnanz schubermann

[@sethjeppson5680]

@@ripvanwinkle9592 etude tableaux op 39 no 5 as well

[@GUILLOM]

What

[@alexparkin8736]

когда переслушался Шопена

[@coucou3233]

Я не могу понять что это не так уж и плохо думаю что ты меня так не хочу спать 🛏

[@sacrilegiousboi978]

Superb, but Lugansky owns no 4

[@seungwonlee9341]

no. 6

[@weetabixharry]

Ah yes, the incomparable My3blKAAblE MOMEHTbl.

[@sm30405]

11:34

[@예성-z6t]

06:55

[@wstegeszczu]

19:45 sounds like the 2nd fragment of 2nd subject of 4th movement of Beethoven's 1st sonata in F Minor, doesn't it?

[@wstegeszczu]

Do you think it was an intentional quotation?

[@kew65]

It does!! That's a cool observation

[@LucasPianoSalon]

59:22

[@daph0307]

10:05.

[@davidwalton431]

Why so many ads? Please round you answer to the nearest dollar.

[@erikbreathes]

Placed by KZbin. Not really sure if Ashish himself makes money of this, cause copyright yknow... so, ask youtube

[@scronx]

The first one is so entrancing it ruins the rest of them for me. Tried a couple but they couldn't hold a candle. Is it really a set of variations or a sort of fantasia?

[@isakhungnes4416]

Where is Nikolai Lugansky?

[@classicalmusiclover4029]

Why is now Giltburg the second Recording?

[@calebhu6383]

4:34

[@calebhu6383]

13:14

[@samaritan29]

he utilizes the same motif in the first theme of op 39 no 7

[@toothlesstoe]

Litventseva's interpretation is a bit too dry for my tastes. I feel as though the sostenuto pedal could be heavily utilized in these pieces. I always like to think of creative ways of using the sostenuto pedal, but I guess that has to do with all the Sorabji I've been practicing.

[@かなえくどう-b1y]

どれも無理して作曲した感しか印象に無い　いつも通りの代わり映えしない楽想と進行 無駄に深刻に重苦しくして　結局目的を見失ってストーリーが全然進んでいない感じ 4番を引き立てようとしているけど　悲惨な事にそれ自体通俗極まった下品な曲になってしまった

[@ЯнХанов-б6ж]

Absolutely disgusting 4th number for both.

[@NiceEvils]

you dont like it?

[@KB-mm6ln]

yeah why not?😡

[@claudioparrella183]

non sono d'accordo

[@scottxu]

Yes, no.6 is truly a masterpiece!

[@riverpearl1029]

59:22

[@name-tq1dk]

10:06 12:48 17:27

[@AshishXiangyiKumar]

*Litvintseva* 00:00 - No.1, Andantino, Bb min 06:55 - No.2, Allegro, Eb min 10:05 - No.3, Andante cantabile, B min 17:26 - No.4, Presto, E min 20:37 - No.5, Adagio sostenuto, Db maj 24:32 - No.6, Maestoso, C maj *Giltburg* 29:03 - No.1, Andatino, Bb min 36:14 - No.2, Allegro, Eb min 39:38 - No.3, Andante cantabile, B min 47:05 - No.4, Presto, E min 50:14 - No.5, Adagio sostenuto, Db maj 54:21 - No.6, Maestoso, C maj Both recordings fantastic but very unlike each other; Litvintseva is exciting, hyper-expressive, and incredibly clear, with lots of clever little stunts in voicing, while Giltburg is oceanic, relaxed, understated at first blush but with ecstatic climaxes (compare both pianists’ Nos.4 and 6.) Some things to look out for: - The way L. takes the opening of No.1, treating the LH as a true second voice, exhaling and inhaling beneath the RH. - L’.s voicing of the octaves at 7:41, with the lower note much louder than the first (this reverses the usual practice, but is a really clever decision, since the melody is about to drop into the LH). In general, L.’s approach to the whole of No.2 is wonderful - especially her numerous, fleeting changes in tempo, which emphasise the unmoored feel of this piece. - Some very effective rubato in No.4 - the trailing off at 18:56, the pause at 19:58. - In No.6, the clarity of the countermelody (contrast with Giltburg, where the melody and accompaniment are locked in an huge battle for supremacy - the effect is symphonic), the surprising quiet of the middle section, and the lovely way the coda emerges from the haze of the transitional passage at 27:50. - In No.1, G.’s accenting of the melodic line starting at 33:15. - G.’s dynamic control in No.2 at 37:18, 37:28, 38:11 . - G’s treatment of No.4’s middle section - incredibly tender (48:20), with the repeat at 49:08 anguished on account of those accented, dragged-out Gs. Also how the LH chromatic line is treated as its own voice, not as accompaniment. - In No.6, despite the general tumult of the interpretation, how beautifully the melody chords are voiced to bring out the top note (sometimes chord is actually rapidly rolled from the top note down).

[@johnchessant3012]

Ashish Xiangyi Kumar

[@erikbreathes]

i dont know if it is at all possible to edit the description of an uploaded video but youtube chapters messed up the progress bar real bad

[@BrandonCuringtonOfficial]

I hope I could pin this comment

[@pantoleonantonio9653]

Pls pin this

[@ecksdee9768]

a a few hjjA aaa sis