Many People are like, because we have Rafale, that's why it is a better jet in your comparison, but can't you guys see the numbers which are mentioned, if they are wrong, point that out. Rafale is better that's why IAF has gone for it, instead of Su 35, we had that option too, but we picked the best one.
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
Iaf ne rfl islie khareeda ki su 35 rfl se bekar h blki islie khareeda kyuki use ek behatareen air superiority ni ek behatareen strike y multirole platform chahie tha every thing depends on role air dominance me f22 or su 57 k alawa koi su 35 ko chunoti ni de sakta or strike me fa18 or f35 k alawa koi rfl ko chunoti ni de sakta Every thing depends on role Egypt ne b to rfl ko ignore kr k su 35 khareeda to kya rfl bekar ho gya????? Or doosri baat su 30 mki ko iaf aaram se su35+ standard me upg kr sakti h Or teesri baat iaf russia pr apni dependency km krna chahti thi
@sunnyroy1004 жыл бұрын
Defence Matrix without a doubt the best aircraft in the neighbourhood specially with SPECTRA and weapons package, I do not think Chinese can integrate PL15 on SU 35 Russian didn’t allow them so the best BVR for SU 35 is R27 ET or R77 clear one generation behind meteor, I think our massive SU30 MKI fleet needs the AL41 engine and Irbis E or a powerful version of Uttam like 1200 TR capacity, this we need in next 3 to 4 years to make sure we can use Astra mk2 to its full range, am happy that SU30 can now fire MICA IR but future air combat even in LAC now will be mostly BVR unless off course they sneak in using terrain masking or we sneak in, knowing PLAAF they will not risk their pilot and possibly use same tactics as the PAF firing from 60+ KMs so we need to be able to punish them
@warfootage78904 жыл бұрын
Sir mera wala point clear krdo na plz tora confusion hai I'm not criticize your video I'm just asking for clearify in one point only sir if u hurt or don't want to answer my question it's ok no problem 🤐 your subscriber from arunachal Pradesh India
@DefenceMatrix4 жыл бұрын
@@warfootage7890 whats the point?
@warfootage78904 жыл бұрын
@@DefenceMatrix sir during the friendly dogfight between IAF vs RUKAF Indian su 30mki score 12-0 against fighter like typhoon n maybe typhoon outperform various times Rafale in friendly dogfight then how it's possible that Rafale can outperform or high meneuver than su35
@Krishnendu7924 жыл бұрын
hstdv has been tested successfully. Hell yeah!!
@pumpkin22284 жыл бұрын
It will be equipped by 2025 which is not good. 2022 would have been better
@tejasraj83174 жыл бұрын
Great ! What else to say.....
@Krishnendu7924 жыл бұрын
@@pumpkin2228 waqt laagta hai bhai. Bacho ka khel thodi na hai. Ab wind tunnel test, lakh simulation, design perfection, sab kuch hoga. Waqt lage, 2 sal ke jaga 5 saal lagein, per best in the business hona chiye. Jaise brahmos hai. Aur ye best system banke rahega.
@pumpkin22284 жыл бұрын
@@Krishnendu792 Haa bhai but it makes me sad even after india develops such good weapons very few countries are interested in buying them . Brahmos is state of an art but very few countries bought it . Don't know why
@niketkumar93934 жыл бұрын
tanx modi goverment for giving special buget for R&D #MAKEININDIA #hstdv
@mukeshdeysarkar67674 жыл бұрын
Level of information is so high that I am becoming a defense expert after hearing this...
@makingsense75774 жыл бұрын
Refere Defence Decode channel also...
@abhisheknegi92614 жыл бұрын
@Radical Muslim same here ready to serve
@abhisheknegi92614 жыл бұрын
@@makingsense7577 defence decode wale ki knowledge bht high level ki h
@sandipanmitra404 жыл бұрын
The info is slightly wrong.
@garg_ak4 жыл бұрын
@Radical Muslim I'll shoot 😎.
@rijwanmulla4204 жыл бұрын
"शौर्यम..दक्षम..युध्धेय..! बलिदान परम धर्म ! 🇮🇳⚔️
@RaviKumar123.4 жыл бұрын
Jay hind
@prashantrana79294 жыл бұрын
JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@bilalsial40963 жыл бұрын
jf-17 thunder block 3 World best quality Pakistan Zindabad
@rijwanmulla4203 жыл бұрын
@@bilalsial4096 yeah best in 10 th generation junk fighter 😂😂😂😂
@bilalsial40963 жыл бұрын
@@rijwanmulla420 Rafael Fak Quality 😜😜
@AMITKUMAR_Hindu4 жыл бұрын
1 of d finest defence channel which explains everything in detail for all of us. HSTDV is now successful. Kudos to DRDO
@Alfa_Chef4 жыл бұрын
1st stage of development is successful
@AMITKUMAR_Hindu4 жыл бұрын
@@Alfa_Chef Thanks bro I know dat. par kabhi kabhi dil ko tasalii dene ke liye bhi kuch kaha ja sakta hai 😀
@Alfa_Chef4 жыл бұрын
AMIT KUMAR Sahi baat
@shishiryadav42223 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the cobra maneuvers by Su 35 🇷🇺🇷🇺🔥🔥
@supremeleader55163 жыл бұрын
Yes
@sunnymitra63723 жыл бұрын
Nagin Dance isn't going to save the Sukhoi 35s from Rafales BVR Missiles
@shishiryadav42223 жыл бұрын
@@sunnymitra6372 Su 35 is capable of winning dogfight with F-22 Raptor so no place for Rafale..
@Priyanka-rawat.1543 жыл бұрын
@@sunnymitra6372 Sukhoi su 35 beat f22 in practice war.... don't underestimate russian fighter jet.....but Rafale is also capable of beating f22 , F22, Rafale, Sukhoi 35 is world best manuaver aircraft
@medicus16213 жыл бұрын
F22 is a stealth fighter It will destroy Su35 or Rafael hundreds of kilometres away without any detection in Su35 or Rafael radar
@AyushGupta-su2no4 жыл бұрын
India joined the elite club of US, Russia, China after successful trial of HSTDV.. JAI HIND.. BHARAT MATA KI JAI.. Again proved our ability after Anti - satellite weapon.. Congratulations DRDO..
@4ngryLumine4 жыл бұрын
Still our su 30 mki is sexiest aircraft ❤️
@u.ncreations25283 жыл бұрын
Because it is air supeority jet
@umarfrok36673 жыл бұрын
No he fucked by PAF in 2019 February 27 . Bechwary me amram mara tha Pakistani salon ne
@kingfisher82603 жыл бұрын
@@umarfrok3667 lol, 😂😂
@sarfrazkhanchachar8123 жыл бұрын
@@umarfrok3667 india has su30 not su35
@sadanandkumbhar99603 жыл бұрын
@@umarfrok3667 madarsachap.
@lovelykumar79134 жыл бұрын
6:40 to 6:55 Su35 can detect a target with RCS of 3 m^2 from 350 km maximum...and it can track a fully loaded Rafale from distances more than 200km. Dassault Rafale is fitted with a RBE2-AA radar system which is detection range of 200+ km...
@Godofschool4 жыл бұрын
If it can detect rafale it doesn't have long range missile to hit it . + Rafale rcs is very small.
@lovelykumar79134 жыл бұрын
It's about 6:40 to 6:55....... just 🤫
@Aryan_Kashyap4 жыл бұрын
Rafale uses SPECTRA technology to hide reduce its RCS...nd it's somehow stealth...Rafale should detect Su35 far earlier...as I think 😎
@mr.mastermind48404 жыл бұрын
@@Godofschool Russia has missiles to hit targets from that long range but they have not sold them to India or China. Russia also has got IR missiles which they don't sell to us or China
@sandipanmitra404 жыл бұрын
@@Aryan_Kashyap Look either way rafael cant hit SU35 brom BVR as it will dodge them like butter
@sumitchand014 жыл бұрын
Defence matrix ko tv pe ana chaye as defence expert
@crdigital91754 жыл бұрын
pakistan ki ma ka boos😂😂😂😂
@dr_split47024 жыл бұрын
@Defence Matrix I just wanted to clarify that it is not 'S U' pronounced individually, its Su, pronounced Soo, short for Sukhoi. My father is in the IAF and i have never heard anyone in the air force saying S U. Otherwise, great content. thanks
@saadimahmoodsajjad28034 жыл бұрын
Yes, hume kahna chahiye Su instead of SU and M I G instead of mig, hum pura ke pura ulta karte!
@saadimahmoodsajjad28034 жыл бұрын
@@chandasingh4172 mandbuddhi! Mai CIA ka Special Activities Division me kaam karta hoon!
@ashutoshsharma71694 жыл бұрын
@@saadimahmoodsajjad2803 😂😂😂
@reticent-4 жыл бұрын
@@saadimahmoodsajjad2803 😂😂😂
@defenceosprey9834 жыл бұрын
@@saadimahmoodsajjad2803ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh bhai
@vilasabrol4 жыл бұрын
How can you say, passive array radar is better than AESA Radar? What I know is even IAF want to replace its Sukhoi 30 MKI's Passive Array Radars with AESA Radars.
@mehul95424 жыл бұрын
Try to hear defence matrix intro music in 2x speed. Wonderful.
@babatunde13234 жыл бұрын
Music name?
@utkarshjangid33744 жыл бұрын
Awesome.
@sandeepggaur41184 жыл бұрын
jinchang zhang layer
@utkarshjangid33744 жыл бұрын
@Space Bound kzbin.info/www/bejne/amauq32ufJyfqa8
@babatunde13234 жыл бұрын
@@utkarshjangid3374 thnxx
@sadique00854 жыл бұрын
is video ka intezar tha mujhe.. 🇮🇳🇮🇳❤️❤️👍👍
@russianmig29dajjalist154 жыл бұрын
SORRY JAMAATI SUKHOI IS MORE SUPERIOR THAN ANY OTHER FIGHTER JET
@legendslog39114 жыл бұрын
@@russianmig29dajjalist15 Abe kya bakwas kar rha he yha pr
@russianmig29dajjalist154 жыл бұрын
sukhoi design bureau corporation... Pavel Sukhoi is company ka founder tha... Aur chief designer tha... Abhi is company ka naam united corporation limited hai sayad... Itba toh sab ko pataa hai
@russianmig29dajjalist154 жыл бұрын
@@legendslog3911 bhai sahi bol rahaa hu gussa kyu ho gai...
@حسنعبدالله-و2ض4 жыл бұрын
The pictures were taken by Andrei Niemann on July 22, when five Su-35SEs arrived in Novosibirsk to refuel. The site and the directive indicate that the fighters are being delivered to Egypt from the Komsomolsk-On-Amur Aircraft Plant (KnAAZ) in the Russian Far East. The five different aircraft carry serial numbers 9210, 9211, 9212, 9213, and 9214. In June, the Arab Defense site presented in a report satellite images of Egyptian Su-35s at the factory.
@saibala93994 жыл бұрын
Please make video on Will India buy Mirage 2000 from Taiwan?
@dgap47244 жыл бұрын
nope. It won't.
@shubhamingole47894 жыл бұрын
Yes. We can buy if they are in good condition and less price.
@saibala93994 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamingole4789 They are being retaired early due to Taiwan not having spare parts. France denied them.
@aryamanusmare12683 жыл бұрын
No
@soham94884 жыл бұрын
Love you from Maharashtra ❤️ ❤️❤️
@manishsharma-jj6lc4 жыл бұрын
@hot bharat sahi baat... Kya hootiyo ki fauj bachi h shiv sena mn.... Kitni achchi party thi.
@eliteevildarkness58304 жыл бұрын
@hot bharat haan toh? Ismai Maharashtra ki kya galti hai?
@comic_eye4 жыл бұрын
@@eliteevildarkness5830 sarkar khudd se bann gai ?? Vote to janta ne hi deye ... Abb baby penguin ko bacchane k leye ye Maharashtra vs india na kr de
@ericksubverter86964 жыл бұрын
_Pls Let's talk about Geo Politics with Indian National Intrest , Not Local politics Because We Marathi People Never Elected current Govt We Elected for BJP Sena govt With Fadanvis As CM , Which We Didnt Got So we Dont Support This Accidental Govt At All Dont Blame us In Anyway posible Jai Hind Jai Maharashtra !!!_
@libra.424 жыл бұрын
@@comic_eye hutiye bjp is major party in Maharashtra
@shreyaskatkar78134 жыл бұрын
Very informative comparison , one of the best defence youtube channel on youtube👍👍
@adityarathore7674 жыл бұрын
Sir Koun sa editing software use karte ho.. mera cooking channel he pls. Mobile or PC. Which software?
@prakhartiwari1514 жыл бұрын
Bhai filmora 9 download kar loo.. 🤗🤗
@adityarathore7674 жыл бұрын
Defence matrix me filmora 9 use hua he kya.. mere pass pc nhai he sirf mobile he
@prakhartiwari1514 жыл бұрын
@@adityarathore767 filmora jada acha hai
@prakhartiwari1514 жыл бұрын
@@adityarathore767 mobile par karna hai toh kinemaster download kar lo bina watermark wala
@adityarathore7674 жыл бұрын
@@prakhartiwari151 ok. Lekin iss video me koun sa editor istemal hua he mujhe ye janna he yrrr
@acharyakautilya4 жыл бұрын
Great bro... Super commitment, I was just remembering your last night video on SU 35 and here you are. Best🙏👍
@subhadipdas84274 жыл бұрын
The INTRO is so good ♥️♥️♥️ play that almost 4-5 times.... Please don't change the into ♥️♥️🙏🙏🙏
@subhadipdas84273 жыл бұрын
@@kiki-nq3cr Yami yugi rap
@123Suryasis4 жыл бұрын
Another advantage Su-35 has over Rafael, is the internal fuel carrying capacity. Rafael has 14,700 lbs internal fuel capacity whereas Su-35 has 25,400 lbs, almost double of Rafale. You can ask any Pilot that higher internal fuel gives a decisive edge to any Fighter aircraft because it allows the Aircraft to maintain Supersonic Speed for longer duration without reducing the range. Although, max Super cruise speed is lesser in Su-35, it can maintain that speed for longer duration (Super-cruise still burns more fuel than less than Mach 1 flight). That has two advantage. If a Plane maintain supersonic speed while launching missiles, the range can be increased by 20% to 30% as the missile already getting a supersonic speed during launch. Secondly, during a fight, Su-35 can burn more fuel to maintain its higher energy. Now regarding the Radar, IRBIS-E in Su-35 is not actually a clear winner. Because of its huge Antenna and high Peak Power, it beats RBE 2 PESA into Range performance and it is in fact higher than APG-77 in F-22 Raptor. But it has some disadvantages as well. Being a PESA radar, it lacks the LPI capability of an AESA radar and Passive Detectors and other RWR receivers can detect its presence passively from a long distance and either start jamming it or can launch Anti-Radiation Missiles. The SPECTRA in Rafale is an extremely advanced system and it can probably detect the emissions from IRBIS-E from a very long distance, probably higher than its RBE-2 radar, hence passively detecting Su-35. Also, the jammer in SPECTRE is a Phased Array Radar jammer which is way more capable than the Jammer in Su-35. Now RBE 2, despite having lesser range than IRBIS-E, is still an AESA and it is extremely hard to jam it, like any AESA, due to its huge range of frequency and high scanning rate. It can lock an enemy Aircraft without the RWR in that enemy aircraft even knowing that it has been locked for a missile launch. Su-35 does have edge in range and it will detect Rafale, probably around 300 km range. But sadly, it does not have any missile to engage it in that distance. On the other hand, Rafale can detect Su-35 in around 200-250 km range and it can use Meteor before Su-35 can have Rafale in its missile range. Also, missile lock from Rafale will be silent due to having an AESA. This is extremely important because Su-35 is a super maneuverable aircraft and it can perform some crazy maneuvers to break the radar lock before the missile launch, if it detects it.
@shubhamsharma36642 жыл бұрын
Ever heard about external fuel capacity? BDW rafale has 14 hardpoints and su 30 mki has 11. ;)
@123Suryasis2 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamsharma3664 Ever heard of external drag? Google it.
@shubhamsharma36642 жыл бұрын
@@123Suryasis Ever heard about delta wing ? Google it ;)
@123Suryasis2 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamsharma3664 looks like you're now trolling.
@shubhamsharma36642 жыл бұрын
@@123Suryasis haha ! Its cut to cut to be honest but yeah su-35 with wider radar range and BVR missiles can be too deadly for rafales if its outside territory, no ground level radar and aircraft is dependent on their own.. i agree with you . taking back from su-57 was a lil blunder for us. Its not too good as compared to f-35s butwe would have at that edge where its too good for chinese and pakistani's till next 20 years by the time amca will be in mass production.
@shashanksoni36983 жыл бұрын
Indian pilots are gems Their combination more deadly
@warfootage78904 жыл бұрын
I'm totally confused sir :( during friendly dogfight between IAF vs RUKAF Indian su 30mki score 12 - 0 against uk eurofighter typhoon and surprisingly typhoon outperform various time Rafale in friendly dogfight 🤔 sir kindly clear my confusion point plz n in previous video you said that su 35 engine life is increase from 4000 hours to 4500 hours 🤔
@warfootage78904 жыл бұрын
@ADITYA RAJ maybe Rafale is capable or reputed fighter but as a Indian I want to hear that Rafale is far better than su 35 but with fact 😥 I only confused in maneuvering section.....if su 30mki can manage 12 scores against fighter like typhoon then I'm dam sure that the su 35 can easily out maneuver Rafale in dogfight 😑 or Bhai itna gali galoch mat ker na kya phta explain k doran kuch galt bol diya ho glti seh video meh🤔
@culturefanatikz8606 Жыл бұрын
This guy is love thank you so much for bringing such information brother you just don't know how much i love your content watching yiu from last 3 years ❤ keep on making this.
@RaptorsParadise3 жыл бұрын
Man that Rafale is smaller than Su-35 and still packs a punch
@dosa29903 жыл бұрын
How is passive electronic radar better than ASEA radar?
@defenceosprey9834 жыл бұрын
sir today india completed it hypersonic missile test successfully so have we got our first hypersonic missile which can challenge the DF17
@MINATOYELLOWFLSH20054 жыл бұрын
HSTDV and DF 17 are very different. HSTDV is better if compared both and present future scope of development also.
@MINATOYELLOWFLSH20054 жыл бұрын
@Sachinraddy Bappasai and HSTDV is not a ballistic missile neither a glide vehicle. It has its own heart!
@Caped_Crusader214 жыл бұрын
Good that u compared them side by side...giving numerical stats and info side by side makes the video more interactive to the viewers....👍
@राष्ट्रधर्मसर्वोपरि-फ9ष4 жыл бұрын
Most underrated channel ... #respect sir #research_n_knowledge 🇮🇳
@AbhishekSingh-qx2mn4 жыл бұрын
You are best youtuber regarding to defence section⚓⚓⚓
@anubhavbadak90674 жыл бұрын
Your knowledge is really nice brother ❤️ Keep going
@thegreenterrace84164 жыл бұрын
Bhai su 35 ka passive radar rafale ke aesa radar se better kese hua???
@TGFN974 жыл бұрын
I wonder why your subscribers are not gaining? Such an underrated channel, Your voice and your way of explaining is very suitable for this kind of technical videos, keep growing , all the best!
@rajdeeproy66504 жыл бұрын
Bro this is the fastest growing defence channel in India
@TGFN974 жыл бұрын
@last jedi yeah 😂 but i personally want to know WHY ? Because media is selling what is on demand,!
@SM.TechIT4 жыл бұрын
speaker is sure from India!!!!!!!
@vishalmaurya9724 жыл бұрын
Love ur dedication about depth of information...keep up the hard work bro..Jai Hind
@deepaksrivastava51293 жыл бұрын
How could you say PESA Irbis E is better than AESA? PESA is more prone to being jammed as they can't frequently change the frequencies. AESA phases out pesa in every area.
@rnak73394 жыл бұрын
Love from Shanghai ♥️🇨🇳
@rnak73394 жыл бұрын
@Kanwer Vikram my 2nd generation aircraft defeated f22 in dogfight 💪💪
@mattblackbeard4 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@satyajitrubisco4 жыл бұрын
U r fake...
@mohit_74624 жыл бұрын
@@rnak7339 😂😂😂😂👍
@rnak73394 жыл бұрын
@Kanwer Vikram I am not economic superpower now maybe infutuer , but not military superpower like Russia and usa , India has power of make economic superpower but Indians are happy in mandir masjid not in development but bjp is good government but your country is divided with pappu and modi all India will support modi so I am definitely say that India will rule the world another time 🙏♥️
@patrickdevin13443 жыл бұрын
Rafale and F-15ex ka full comparison video bhai...
@badbunny95054 жыл бұрын
this video is full of wrong information.......
@KalamkarINKI4 жыл бұрын
Explain
@hishamtariq70543 жыл бұрын
Hey can you quote any reliable source about the range of METEOR being 200 km?
@Aryan_Kashyap3 жыл бұрын
Till now...Meteor is world's best AAM
@hishamtariq70543 жыл бұрын
@@Aryan_Kashyap Yes, the specifications of Meteor are well ahead of other BVRAAM's of its type (AIM-120, R-77 or Chinese missiles). However its range seems to be overestimated in the video which is contrary to the data mentioned by some of the operators of Meteor (e.g. Saab which uses Meteor in JAS 39 Gripen).
@Aryan_Kashyap3 жыл бұрын
@@hishamtariq7054 see if a traditional motor engine can reach upto 200km...jst thik what havoc can meteor bring with it's Ramjet
@foodiesjunction84274 жыл бұрын
Sir ek like hi de diya kro😅
@nayanjyotidas6544 жыл бұрын
Bhai like mil gaya😁
@bkp222 жыл бұрын
I Prefer the beautiful the powerful SU 35 Flanker 😍
@vrugepost71703 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the most important thing su 35 is arround half the price of dassault rafle . In 2016 Su 35 is $75 million Dassault rafle was $130 million . With the price of a rafle , you can buy 2 su 35 . So su35 wins
@bkp222 жыл бұрын
Even in a real fight the SU 35 Flanker makes more sense rather than this French Garbage which has no kills 🤷♂️
@ImDmainguy2 жыл бұрын
DUDE NO MATTER WHAT ANYONE THINKS RAFALE AINT NO GARBAGE
@SierraHunter2106 Жыл бұрын
@Abhijeet Kundu LMAOOOOO that's called sense of humor lmao
@rakeshkryadav5888 Жыл бұрын
@AbhijeetKundu su35 and rafate both are 4.5 gen aircraft, use some brain before trolling.
@Gr8putin2 жыл бұрын
@defence matrix can you do one video on Tejas angle of tattack turning radius etc
@sunnyroy1004 жыл бұрын
@Defence Matrix good video couple of assumptions will make it even clearer Su35 is in limited in numbers for PLAAF 24 in service, they can deploy max 8 to 10 against IAF, China bought SU 35 to get hold of AL 41 engines but Russia was smart this time they did not allow any license production nor local parts manufacturing. Second Irbis E is an extremely capable radar can detect Rafael at 150 to 170 KM range but Su 35 lacks a good BVR to complement it , Russia is testing R37 M on Su 35 this year and will take time, for now IAF rafael with RBE2 and Meteor will have significant edge in BVR as Su 35 has huge RCS and RBE 2 can detect it about 140 KM and can take a shot with 2 meteors.
@sandipanmitra404 жыл бұрын
But Meteor missile will not be able to hit SU 35 in BVR range, as SU 35 can literally glide past them with its maneuverability.
@devashisdas50243 жыл бұрын
J-20 not in service? That's not true. J-20 is giving service in PLAAF from more than 3-4 years ago. Large number of inventory tells us all.
@sayantan7774 жыл бұрын
India should go for 1 extra squadron of Rafale & scrap MMRCA 2. Also include private players for production of Tejas 1A instead of PSU.
@danagarimadhukar14883 жыл бұрын
Compare Apollo hospitals with Government Hospitals..... Compare Corporate schools with Government Schools
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
please make a vdo on bramhos ng vs scalp storm shadow
@defenceosprey9834 жыл бұрын
sir when the payload capacity , and hardpoints are more than su35 then why we call su35 a heavy weight aircraft and Rafale a medium weight aircraft
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
Coz su 35 mx tak off wet is 38 tin and rfl is 24.5 tons
@microflyer20204 жыл бұрын
Yeah right, but Su 35 can easily dodge meteor bcz su35 will be fast enough @bvr fights, though meteor is equally better but has never been tested against thrust vectoring aircraft.... Wht you say?
@sandipanmitra404 жыл бұрын
Yes, finally someone who shares the same thought as mine. SU 35 is god in Dog fight and he is wrong about the fact that 3D nozzle losses energy, when u use it at lower degrees then NO!. It is able to retain its energy, moreover rafale cant hit it in BVR, but in close range the meteor will trouble su35
@pkmkb24-74 жыл бұрын
Dont wrote unless u are sure... Meteor is battle proven worlds most deadliest missile tested against many thrust vectoring planes.....there is a reason it has kill probability of more then 95%
@bkp222 жыл бұрын
@@pkmkb24-7 Kill probability 🤦♂️ This Garbage French jet has no kills pakshiyo ko missile se mara hoga shayad 🤣 SU 35 is a real boss in dog fight with many kills by his side
@rahulroy-lt4ps3 жыл бұрын
Turn rate missile ka jitna kum hoga utna acha hai na sirji?
@farukahmed24454 жыл бұрын
Raafle kee ek hi atchahi hai yea size mae Su35 sae sota hai.Lakin Su 35 Jaisa manurable nahi hai .jai hind.
@Godofschool4 жыл бұрын
Rafale is 4.5 generation & su-35 is 4 the generation
@Aryan_Kashyap4 жыл бұрын
Rafale has better avionics, radar nd weapons...nd uses SPECTRA technology which makes it's semi stealth nd hard to detect
@arnabkumarpandatech-0544 жыл бұрын
Please can you provide any clarification if tejas mk2 and TEDBF will have supercruise capability?
@indiakingwarrobot69594 жыл бұрын
Su-35 ki tail aur f-16 ki tail inhe bahut jaldi dushman k fighter k samne se piche jane me madad karti hai ,jabki delta wing wale fighters ek dam se kisi fighter k pichhe nhi ja sakte ,..... Delta wings. Wale fighters ka turning radius bahut jyada hota hai jabki f-16 aur su-35 ki tail inhe sharp turn karne me bahut madad karti hai ....
@purkaitsurajit534 жыл бұрын
Jai Hind!!🇮🇳🇮🇳Proud to have Rafales in our fleet!!❤❤😍😍
@drafrozeiqbal69742 жыл бұрын
Aisy proud ker raha ha k jaisy Rafael khud bana kia ha lolxxxx
@mayureshshendkar82684 жыл бұрын
Even if rafale is better than su 35. But my concern is China had more Su 35 and till today we have only 5. Even though we have quality but quantity has its own quality. I Hope we get the delivery of all rafale as soon as possible.
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
Sr aap ye bolna chahte ho ki rafale su 35 ko wvr me hara dega 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@DefenceMatrix4 жыл бұрын
Su 35 is maneuverable, but MICA is more maneuverable, it also uses Thrust vectoring nozzels and can turn upto 180 degrees to shoot down the target, so yes that can take down Su 35.
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
@Varad Mujumdar 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Only in stimulation vdo games
@DefenceMatrix4 жыл бұрын
@ADITYA RAJ Kaun sa nasha hai?
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
@Varad Mujumdar sasta nasha krna chod de😂😂😂😂😂
@ashutoshtripathi43294 жыл бұрын
@Varad Mujumdar mujko kuch yaad aa ra h Vatnam war k smy westerns guns ko outdated bol rhe the ab f22/ 35 me b guns lga rhe h😂😂😂😂😂😂
@RamSharma-90_644 жыл бұрын
Thank U bhaisaab, as always very good video by you!!
@hittv8174 жыл бұрын
Why Rafale is medium multirole if it has better carrying capacity?
@VivekSingh-yv2bc4 жыл бұрын
Range
@rajibsarkar60524 жыл бұрын
plz compare SU 57 ,Rafalle ,F 15EX & Eurofighter Typhoon & among them which is the best
@AbhiKohli4 жыл бұрын
Superb comparison. Neat and clean. For the masses. Rafale meri jaan!! ❤️❤️😻😻 Jai Hind. 🇮🇳🇮🇳
@vedantchorge3043 жыл бұрын
Sir ye chinese su35 ke numbers hain ya Russian
@MathhackAssam4 жыл бұрын
Compare J-10 with WW2 fighter😂
@harikrishnanks93664 жыл бұрын
Jf 17 vs ww2 aircraft
@allcountriesfighterjets4 жыл бұрын
Compare to hal Teja samosa 10 generation with WW2 fighter🤣🤣🤣
@adityaverma67544 жыл бұрын
@@allcountriesfighterjets lol jaahil log deltawing ko samosa fighter kh rhe hai . atleast its better than junkfighter 17
@RaiMuhammadPak3 жыл бұрын
@@adityaverma6754 Ooooooooooh when you will hear this youtuber you will make India first in every field. He says j 10 is not as good as f 16 block 70 while all foreign KZbinrs have ranked j 10 better than F16. Who knows if he compares Tejas samosa with J 20. Just Indians cannot let anybody better.
@adityaverma67543 жыл бұрын
@@RaiMuhammadPak j20 ko toh patthar mar ke gira de
@meghrajgoredeshmukh6834 жыл бұрын
One more advantage of Su 35 is its cheaper than rafale and its of Russia and our pilots are trained already to fly russian jets. Jai Hind.
@manjitdutta33974 жыл бұрын
Su35
@rssbhakt22894 жыл бұрын
Rafael is better than su35
@manjitdutta33974 жыл бұрын
@@rssbhakt2289 this is your view
@manjitdutta33974 жыл бұрын
@@rssbhakt2289 yes sir because every body is wing commander is youtube
@rssbhakt22894 жыл бұрын
@@manjitdutta3397 ওওও তাই নাকি , দেখা যাক
@manjitdutta33974 жыл бұрын
@@rssbhakt2289 ki lekhsa ako buji pao nai
@moumitamandal47884 жыл бұрын
According to detection power of rader on rcs value su35 Rafale ko & Rafale Su 35 ko Kita dur se detect Kar Sakta hai ?
@Aryan_Kashyap4 жыл бұрын
Rafale jldi detect kr lega becz of SPECTRA nd somehow stealth
@JASHVEER223 жыл бұрын
JF 17 with mullah blessings and imaan of Pakistani pilots coupled with roohani forces can shoot any alien spaceships so chota mota fighter jet is no match for it.
@asadaman79483 жыл бұрын
Jf 17 to mulla blessed hy ya nhi likin rafal sab k samny pandith bless zaroro howa he bhol gae wo nembo sindoor hri mirchen👀👀
@JASHVEER223 жыл бұрын
@@asadaman7948 true. Thanks for appreciating😁
@vidhushastri46464 жыл бұрын
How can you be so sure that Su 35's Irbis E PESA radar is better than Rafael's RBE2 AESA radar? Please explain?
@DefenceMatrix4 жыл бұрын
Range is more, detection of 3m sq object can be done from a distance of 400 km as explained in yesterday's video, where as for RBE2 it's around 250 km.
@soham94884 жыл бұрын
Second liker and viewer
@guerra1303 жыл бұрын
Su-35 súper 💪🇷🇺
@Itachiscs1234 жыл бұрын
I still like su 35 .beautiful
@pradeep68283 жыл бұрын
That is why we need to purchase 100 more Rafale. If cost is issue government should seek donation from public. Many of us r ready to contribute.
@sumitchand014 жыл бұрын
Jai Shree Ram 🙏🌺🙏🌺
@fragout14214 жыл бұрын
@Defence matrix Thanks for addressing my questions regarding su 30 issue and Jaguar fighters .Both videos were great and we're very informative. Could you please share your views about recent developments regarding Taiwan retiring their Mirage 2000 aircraft and will it be a good decision for IAF to buy those Mirages and what will be their impact, because if India inducted these 54 fighters IAF will have largest Mirage 2000 fleet after Armee de'l Air .
@theentertainer4334 жыл бұрын
Please explain -what do you mean by service sealing means 4000 km of su
@happyvelly30664 жыл бұрын
U r great...best comparison in KZbin
@pawankumarshrivastva51163 жыл бұрын
Please make a comparetive video between RAFALE F-4 version and Su-35.
@imsavage24494 жыл бұрын
I love how Indians won every conflict in films in reality china has killed 30 soldiers by now and captured 1000s of sq kms
@rakeshshendre55034 жыл бұрын
Plz compar tejas mk1a with j10 Comparison not only specification along with real capabilities
@isaacgeorgevarghese4 жыл бұрын
First of great video, really informative... Secondly the music at the end of the video is really 👍👍😎😎
@sajidisa17403 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation.
@anandgautam65834 жыл бұрын
Which can perform cobra maneuver better?
@zahidusmanofficial3 жыл бұрын
In your all videos the winners are always from india
@uniqueperspective71564 жыл бұрын
Wao you have great knowledge dude👍
@kaifkhan-bj9lz4 жыл бұрын
Bhai any update regarding mmrca 2.0 people say that it's scarp again
@sarthakgupta62734 жыл бұрын
i didnt understand how and why you said irbis e is better than rbe2 .rbe2 also rumored to have aggressive jamming modes in it
@देवसाहू-ग3श3 жыл бұрын
Bhai ye supercruise kya hai ?
@shashwatmukherjee87724 жыл бұрын
Clear & perfect comparison of Dassault Rafale vs Sukhoi 35S fighter aircraft. Now you decide guys. Source from Wikipedia. General characteristics of Dassault Rafale operations with France & India. Crew: 1 or 2 Length: 15.27 m (50 ft 1 in) Wingspan: 10.90 m (35 ft 9 in) Height: 5.34 m (17 ft 6 in) Wing area: 45.7 m2 (492 sq ft) Empty weight: 10,300 kg (22,708 lb) (B) 9,850 kilograms (21,720 lb) (C) 10,600 kilograms (23,400 lb) (M) Gross weight: 15,000 kg (33,069 lb) Max takeoff weight: 24,500 kg (54,013 lb) Fuel capacity: 4,700 kg (10,362 lb) internal for single-seater (C); 4,400 kg (9,700 lb) for two-seater (B) Maximum fuel: (C): 16,550 l (4,370 US gal; 3,640 imp gal) (5,750 l (1,520 US gal; 1,260 imp gal) internal + 2,300 l (610 US gal; 510 imp gal) in 2x conformal tanks + 8,500 l (2,200 US gal; 1,900 imp gal) in 5 drop tanks) Powerplant: 2 × Snecma M88-2 turbofans, 50.04 kN (11,250 lbf) thrust each dry, 75 kN (17,000 lbf) with afterburner Performance Maximum speed: 2,223 km/h (1,381 mph, 1,200 kn) / Mach 1.8 at high altitude 1,390 km/h, 860 mph, 750 kn / Mach 1.1 at low altitude Supercruise: Mach 1.4 Combat range: 1,850 km (1,150 mi, 1,000 nmi) on penetration mission with three tanks (5,700 L), two SCALP-EG and two MICA AAMs. Ferry range: 3,700 km (2,300 mi, 2,000 nmi) with 3 drop tanks Service ceiling: 15,835 m (51,952 ft) g limits: +9 −3.6 (+11 in emergencies) Rate of climb: 304.8 m/s (60,000 ft/min) Wing loading: 328 kg/m2 (67 lb/sq ft) Thrust/weight: 0.988 (100% fuel, 2 EM A2A missile, 2 IR A2A missile) version B Armament Guns: 1× 30 mm (1.2 in) GIAT 30/M791 autocannon with 125 rounds Hardpoints: 14 for Air Force versions (Rafale B/C), 13 for Navy version (Rafale M) with a capacity of 9,500 kg (20,900 lb) external fuel and ordnance,with provisions to carry combinations of: Missiles: Air-to-air: Magic II MBDA MICA IR or EM MBDA Meteor Air-to-ground: MBDA Apache MBDA Storm Shadow/SCALP-EG AASM-Hammer (SBU-38/54/64) GBU-12 Paveway II, GBU-22 Paveway III, GBU-24 Paveway III, GBU-49 Enhanced Paveway II AS-30L Mark 82 Air-to-surface: MBDA AM 39-Exocet anti-ship missile Nuclear Deterrence: ASMP-A nuclear missile Other: Thales Damocles targeting pod Thales AREOS (Airborne Recce Observation System) reconnaissance pod Thales TALIOS multi-function targeting pod in the future (F3R Standard) Up to 5 drop tanks Buddy-buddy refuelling pod Avionics Thales RBE2-AA AESA radar Thales SPECTRA Electronic Warfare system. Thales/SAGEM-OSF Optronique Secteur Frontal infra-red search and track (IRST) system General characteristics of Sukhoi 35S operations with Russia & China both. Crew: 1 Length: 21.9 m (71 ft 10 in) Wingspan: 15.3 m (50 ft 2 in) Height: 5.9 m (19 ft 4 in) Wing area: 62 m2 (670 sq ft) Airfoil: 5% Empty weight: 19,000 kg (41,888 lb) Gross weight: 25,300 kg (55,777 lb) with 50% internal fuel Max takeoff weight: 34,500 kg (76,059 lb) Fuel capacity: 11,500 kg (25,400 lb) internal Powerplant: 2 × Saturn AL-41F1S afterburning turbofan engines, 86.3 kN (19,400 lbf) thrust each dry, 142 kN (32,000 lbf) with afterburner Performance Maximum speed: 2,400 km/h (1,500 mph, 1,300 kn) / M2.25 at altitude 1,400 km/h (870 mph; 760 kn) / M1.13 at sea level Cruise speed: 1,250 km/h (780 mph, 670 kn) / M1.1+ supercruise at medium altitude. Range: 3,600 km (2,200 mi, 1,900 nmi) at altitude 1,580 km (982 mi) at sea level Combat range: 1,600 km (990 mi, 860 nmi) approx[202] Ferry range: 4,500 km (2,800 mi, 2,400 nmi) with 2 external fuel tanks Service ceiling: 18,000 m (59,000 ft) g limits: +9 Rate of climb: 280 m/s (55,000 ft/min) + Wing loading: 408 kg/m2 (84 lb/sq ft) With 50% fuel 500.8 kg/m2 (102.6 lb/sq ft) with full internal fuel Thrust/weight: 1.13 with 50% fuel 0.92 with full internal fuel Armament Guns: 1 × internal 30 mm Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 autocannon with 150 rounds Hardpoints: 12 hardpoints, consisting of 2 wingtip rails, and 10 wing and fuselage stations with a capacity of 8,000 kg (17,630 lb) of ordnance,with provisions to carry combinations of: Rockets: S-25 Air-to-air missiles: 8 × R-27ER/ET R-40 R-60 6 × R-73E 12 × R-77M/P/T 6 × R-74 Air-to-surface missiles: Kh-25ML 6 × Kh-29L/TE 3 × 3M-14AE Anti-ship missiles: 3 × 3M-54AE1 6 × Kh-31A/AD Kh-35U 5 × Kh-59MK 1 × Yakhont Anti-radiation missiles: Kh-25MP 6 × Kh-31P/PD 5 × Kh-58UShE Bombs: *** 8 × KAB-500KR TV-guided bombs 8 × KAB-500L laser-guided bombs 8 × KAB-500OD guided bombs 8 × KAB-500S-E satellite-guided bombs 3 × KAB-1500KR TV-guided bombs 3 × KAB-1500L laser-guided bombs GBU-500 laser-guided bomb GBU-500T TV-guided bomb GBU-1000 laser-guided bomb GBU-1000T TV-guided bomb Avionics Irbis-E passive electronically scanned array radar OLS-35 infra-red search and track system L175M Khibiny-M electronic countermeasures system
@subratagupta56934 жыл бұрын
What is the radar cross section value of rafael and su 35?and from how much distance rafael and su 35 can see each other in the radar?
@talktoaviii3 жыл бұрын
What about the price factor ?
@f581474x4 жыл бұрын
Once you fire a BVR at the Rafale, the plane is forced to jettison its tanks. With the after burners on its only a matter of time before the Rafel runs out of fuel. Also India only has 5 Rafales which the IAF is not fully trained with and does not have a study supply of spare parts. Rafale will not be fully operational for a few years. And even when it is you cannot compare a medium weight fighter with a front line Air superiority fighter.
@czscorpion57642 жыл бұрын
If u are between the MAR( minimum abort range) of bvr missiles then it's impossible to evade them by any means
@sunandosen77203 жыл бұрын
Overall it is a belief that given the ground infra available for Sukhoi aircraft the govt should
@gauravchauhan27523 жыл бұрын
What is this crazy music in last few seconds?
@RaSeL_MaSuD4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation.... 😂😂😂 Rafale is more manoeuvable then su-35 only possible in INDIA..😂
@aldenunion4 жыл бұрын
Actually Rafale is very nimble,high speed turns by design,while design of Su35 ,It needs the vector of thrust to equal that of Rafale. Rafale has superior electronics as well but the design and wing configuration makes use of trust . Air combat is much different than youtube hype channels,you will see how well Rafale will serve India.(Remember I said.)
@abhinibeshghosh17422 ай бұрын
Aja rafael ke sath dog fight mei pant gila ho jaiga 😂
@kaka_kaka282 жыл бұрын
Please do a comparison of Rafale vs Su-57 .
@blessonjacob38094 жыл бұрын
Radar cross section on the Rafale is significantly lower. Another critical difference.