I’m part of drone deer recovery and man there are so many deer that get wounded with archery. It’s way worse than what you would think. High FOC is the way to go in my opinion.
@The_Judge3006 ай бұрын
Just read some of the comments here from people using light setups and claim that they never lose a deer... I have been breeding and training tracking dogs for 30 years and that has without a doubt showed me that extremely many hunters are lying about their kill ration when hunting. Specially with archery gear. The first 10 years, hunters almost only contacted me after they couldn't find their trophy bucks and I thought it was extremely strange that they only had crap shots and poor penetration when shooting at trophy bucks, but never when they shot at does. As they experienced that me and my tracking dogs were of extreme help, they started to ask me track does as well and when all those calls came in, and some admitted that they had lost many does before they started to use me for that, I really started to realize how huge this problem was. And the reality was also that guys that used light arrows with mechanical broadheads needed my tracking help a lot more than the ones using heavier arrows and fixed broadheads. I had hunters that used 350 grain arrows with large cutting mechanicals from 50lbs bows because they had seen that the Drury brothers used it... I am not saying that 650 grain arrows are needed for deer at all, but a 500 grain arrow with 12-15% foc and a very sharp cut on contact broadhead works VERY well in my opinion.
@glennl96306 ай бұрын
@@The_Judge300 yea no way
@cosmogervasi44966 ай бұрын
Bow Hunting to me was never meant to be a long range proposition, (( 60,70, 80, 100yrds )) the idea always was to get close and personal to a wild animal and go home with it, if you can shoot long distance good for you 😎👍I'm not that guy ... 😎🏹🦌
@feelslikefar505 ай бұрын
Whenever I watch videos and see people ask questions like that, my thought is... "Solving this problem is simple, start Bow Hunting". Stop trying to shoot things at those distances. Sort of like the modern "muzzle loader" guys who want to shoot 150-200+ yards. "Start muzzle loading". Stop trying to use these things like something they're not. The hardest thing about bow hunting isn't in shooting the animal, it's in NOT shooting at animals. (ones you COULD shoot with something else.) A 500 yard shot doesn't impress me. A 5 yard shot does. Hunt more. "Do all your hunting BEFORE you pull the trigger."
@glennl96305 ай бұрын
80 yard shot would be far with a rifle by me😂
@progradepainting37555 ай бұрын
@@feelslikefar50 I’ll make it even easier for you. if you can’t shoot a modern day muzzleloader out to 150 yards, don’t even hunt, because you haven’t put the work in to do it effectively. End of story. I’m blowing 1 gallon water jugs up all day long with my muzzle loader at 300 + yards.
@feelslikefar505 ай бұрын
(hunting with a modern inline is like kissing your sister. If you need to tell yourself "it's the same thing..." well, then we can't help you.)
@d500mag24 ай бұрын
That's what archery is about to me also. Unfortunately, the archery industry needs money. The way it gets our money is by having pros turn hunting into target archery.
@km67316 ай бұрын
shooting to try to keep the arrow inside the animal is a terrible idea. Animal stress, partial penetration, plugged hole, broken arrow.
@stephenballard37595 ай бұрын
1:15:30, talking about pin gaps. Why cant we get compound shooters to do any stump shooting? Also, if you hate the pin gap, just add another pin.
@km67316 ай бұрын
I've had 3 bone hits with a heavy setup. With 650 and single bevel, An elk humerus and a spine and pass through the bone. A 550 grain with a mechanical and hit the neck vertebrae and wedged between the discs as the deer jump string and turned his head to bolt and that arrow didn't get through the neck discs.
@doylethorn92516 ай бұрын
Great show guys! It never ceases to amaze me how people can't just take what information they can use from a presentation and leave the rest and move on. By the way, to the ignorant person bashing Dr Ashby's study, the Ashby Foundation has picked up where Dr Ashby left off. Over the last 2 years, the Foundation has been testing Dr Ashby's study with Compound Bows. Wouldn't you know it, the 12 steps equally applies to modern Compounds. Good day all!
@jeffmichel43125 ай бұрын
It’s Comical really that people want to dispute these concepts. It’s physics and math. Ballistic science…… I just…… whatever.
@km67316 ай бұрын
"ill clean that one while you're coaching the kids" priceless
@itzwade6 ай бұрын
Personally I’m not on the heavy arrow train but I respect the point of view, nice conversation guys.
@jeffmichel43125 ай бұрын
It’s not a train it’s sound fundamentals.
@progradepainting37555 ай бұрын
@@jeffmichel4312it’s definitely a train, and you definitely aren’t the arbiter of sound fundamentals, because it isn’t a one size fits all solution.
@omarcurbelo53426 ай бұрын
The problem is the delivery and who is delivering. Not everyone can ignore the “character” and listen to the content. If you dive into the Ashby report you’ll see weight is not top priority. And if they can shoot those crazy 800+ gn arrows at 20 yards and get pass through with a RECURVE BOW. You best believe I’m shooting 650 with a compound at 30 yards. Also people are basing this “bad flight” on videos. Not personal experience. Currently shooting a 250spine with 23%FOC at 644gn and that baby flies like a dream. Before that I had 250spine with 15%FOC at 650gn and that arrow after 40yards had a hellacious curve. As the FOC went up the flight became straighter. At the end of the day…… Shoot what makes you feel confident. If this information makes you second guess your current setup. Then look into it some more.
@AKOutdoorAdventures5 ай бұрын
Really enjoyed this video and the insights on arrow dynamics and hunting! The discussion on arrow weight, momentum, and penetration was fascinating. I noticed the term "scalar" was used in a way that seemed different from its physics definition. For clarity: Scalar: A quantity with only magnitude, no direction (e.g., mass, temperature). Vector: A quantity with both magnitude and direction (e.g., velocity, force). Kinetic Energy (KE): A scalar quantity representing energy of motion. KE = 1/2 × mass × velocity^2. It increases dramatically with speed but doesn't have direction. Momentum: A vector quantity representing mass in motion. Momentum = mass × velocity. It has both magnitude and direction, increasing linearly with mass and speed. It's worth noting that while kinetic energy is a scalar (it just tells us "how much" energy), momentum is a vector (it tells us "how much" and "which way"). Would you be open to collaborating with physics enthusiasts for some controlled tests? It could be interesting to see how these concepts play out in carefully measured experiments. I don't have a physics background, but I have equipment that might be useful: LabRadar Arrows ranging from 342 grains to ~620 grains Bow configurable from 55lbs to 80lbs, tunable for any of these arrows I'd love to learn more and potentially help with rigorous testing. It could be a great way to combine practical archery knowledge with careful experiments. I have a few other people who would be interested in helping as well.
@bakters4 ай бұрын
We leave all our stuff on the boats too. All night, all year even. I live in Poland. I really like it here, as you can imagine.
@WestMoSaddleHunters6 ай бұрын
Blue Wildebeest Africa 65-70 minimum suggested by outfitters is 500 gr, buffalo is 80# minimum 600gr+, giraffe 90# 600gr minimum Most outfitters suggest you get into elephant and a couple others you aren’t even allowed to hunt with archery equipment. You can bet your rear that if you go to Alaska and try to hunt grizzly with a 400 grain arrow I’d say the outfitters going to tell you to take a hike or get your own body bag for your remains. Am I saying everything that’s being said is 100% fact, No but I’m also not bashing a guy who has put the time in and figured something out either. Just because we don’t agree with someone’s opinion doesn’t mean we are right. Have a nice Day.
@Bartimusblue276 ай бұрын
All class 3&4 game species legally requires 80lb draw and a 750 grain arrow as the minumum weight. Class 5 (giraffe, elephant, hippo) requires 90lbs and 750gr+ As a guy who shoots "heavy" (82lb/30.5" 770gr 27%foc) at everything, there's four big pros. My arrows are significantly more accurate/consistent over distance, wind has very little effect on trajectory, they don't stop in game (no exceptions yet), and they break a LOT less. Realistically, any arrow over 500gr or 19%foc will consistently go through a broadside whitetail with a cut-on-contact head, but like you said, people want to take that arrow to alaska/africa, and then force the guide to be the asshole of reason, so the dumbass with hope doesn't literally poke the bear.
@jeffmichel43125 ай бұрын
No body bag needed grizz will eat the carcass.
@jacobpatterson20326 ай бұрын
I feel like ranch fairy would hate my setup lol my biggest thing with shooting a "lighter" arrow(442gr) is the flatter arc. In my simple mind wouldn't less arc be more forgiving? I live in SD and it just makes sense for when longer shots present themselves. I'm trying to be open minded about a heavy setup but the only thing I see it being beneficial for is pigs, bears, buffalo... All of which I have yet to hunt. Great video and conversation fellas!
@gsnicholas85225 ай бұрын
Troy did a test with a mid 400 grain vs a mid 600 grain arrow at distance. Then he repeats it with 2 other shooters. The result was virtually the same both times. With a missed yardage judgement of (if I’m remembering correctly) 5 yards resulted in a 2.5 inch difference in impact point. The videos are on his channel.
@progradepainting37554 ай бұрын
@@gsnicholas8522 that test was horrible. He had a group bigger than a pie plate at 40 yards, so how are you supposed gauge drop when you can’t even keep your groups within a softball at a very short distance like 40 yards?
@austinhall59334 ай бұрын
@gsnicholas8522 a better and way simpler test is looking at a yardage tape. I've built arrows from 415gr to 702gr and there is a HUGE difference in being 5 yards off. They simply need better shooters.
@Ealum10135 ай бұрын
Absolutely love listening to the Ranch Fairy. This man has such logical knowledge that most people refuse to listen to or learn. You can't argue with anatomy
@progradepainting37554 ай бұрын
@@Ealum1013 no, everyone has listened to him, and easily can see he doesn’t really understand archery or bowhunting, and has merely made a space for the lowest common denominator of bowhunting.
@Ealum10134 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755 Thanks for your opinion but they are like assholes. Every one has one. You choose to watch and like what you want and i'll do the same. Have a great weekend
@joevandivner97046 ай бұрын
Fairy did a test a few weeks ago and showed the difference in drop from a 400 something arrow and a 550 or 650 arrow and the difference in drop was not as much as most would think. Also the heavy arrow is Quieter and less stress in the bow plus more KE. Ranch fairy has always said pick the heaviest arrow u can that has an acceptable trajectory for you. Why do so many people get in there fillings about this. Maybe it’s because you no you are using an inferior arrow so u have to make it seem like others don’t no what they are doing! Shameful
@progradepainting37555 ай бұрын
How could you even make heads from tails on that test when his group was all over the place?
@gsnicholas85225 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755because he repeated the test with 2 other shooters and the result was the same.
@andrecancilla49015 ай бұрын
When you have to be accurate within 5 yards to not miss. The system isn’t practical. If you can push an arrow at a decent speed then by all means use it. Sacrificing trajectory for arrow weight on an animal that isn’t hard to penetrate is silly. Broadhead style is way more important for penetration than arrow weight is on deer sized animals
@gsnicholas85225 ай бұрын
@@andrecancilla4901 if someone can't be accurate to within 5 yards then they shouldn't be shooting at live animals.
@andrecancilla49015 ай бұрын
@@gsnicholas8522 *judge yardage to within 5 yards. I guess you’re the second coming of Levi morgan
@timharrelson77974 ай бұрын
Shooting at foam and Shooting at an animal is way different. Ive used light arrow set ups and now a heavier one . Had much better luck with my 550 grainer
@The_Judge3006 ай бұрын
Just an advice to the one being worried about his gap shooting out to 50-60 yards with his 550 grain arrow. Test it out and you will quickly learn that gap shooting with that setup is not that hard when you understand how to do it well and what little difference it makes with that arrow compared to a 450 grain arrow if the deer moves 2-3 yards further away or closer from where you measured it to be. You can very easily see that it has moved a bit away or a bit closer and not more than 5 yards and that tells you to aim a bit higher or a bit lower and you will punch the deer where you want as long as you execute your shot well.
@hunterosburn43416 ай бұрын
Great video guys theres so many variables going on in most hunting situations that its best to atleast prepare for the worst in my opinion
@HUNTERSADVANTAGE6 ай бұрын
100% agree!
@NonAbidingDude2 ай бұрын
When will people realize that fairy is pushing heavy arrows and primitive broadheads for pigs, cape buffalo, blue whales and misses forward on North American animals? MOST misses are back, favoring (due to soft tissue) a larger cutting diameter non archaic broadhead. It's wild to see people who hunt past 20 yards for other than pigs can take this seriously?
@jason_mc776 ай бұрын
The comments 😂!! The trolls need to step up their game and quit using the same old arguments that have been disproven time and time again. It's also funny and, if im being realistic, sad, how many people only hear what they want or fail to comprehend the context of what is presented.
@glennl96306 ай бұрын
Great point so true!!
@codydixon53765 ай бұрын
Pretty simple to me. What pushes another car further. A truck running 80mph or a train running 20mph. Weight matters.
@progradepainting37555 ай бұрын
@@jason_mc77 care to make a specific point as a reference?
@jason_mc775 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755 I would for anyone but you. You seem to have a massive lack of comprehension for context as demonstrated here and in the Brandon McDonald video you attempted to troll me on. Not only are you, once again, demonstrating said lack of comprehension but you're being extremely cringey and creepy following me from one to video to another and making a similar comment. Dude it's not only weird, it's also pathetic and sad.
@stephenballard37595 ай бұрын
The REAL vitals are up front on any quadraped. Peripheral lungs are "meh" at best.
@glennl96305 ай бұрын
M1 Abrams going 40mph or a Ford Pinto going 60mph wonder which would do more damage 😂🤔🤔🤔
@scrotang5 ай бұрын
Pinto would act as an incendiary so point to the Ford.
@steelereels75004 ай бұрын
The results are all going to vary On Target
@austinhall59334 ай бұрын
That's a huge false equivalency. You are talking about one ounce vs 1.5oz.
@glennl96304 ай бұрын
@@steelereels7500explain that one
@jons7e6 ай бұрын
I've had sub 400 grain arrows go through steel tubing. I'm not suggesting anyone hunt with that, but what are people doing that they're having penetration issues unless you have a short draw length and draw weight? I think it's the broad head far more than the arrow weight. You don't want an arrow 40 yards out the other side... you want an arrow that barely makes it out the other side because you didn't waste anything, momentum or trajectory or time on target. BTW at 60 yards the delta of time on target from a 450 and 650 is @ 0.18 seconds, but an animal can react in as little as 0.05/0.1 seconds... so it sounds like a small amount of time difference between the arrows, but time on target is important, and the slower projectile can increase your chance of the scenario in which the animal blocks vitals as Troy described. No solutions.... only trade-offs. I like the research
@zaynemikita68976 ай бұрын
Unfortunately ranch fairy is just charismatic and made a market. 100% agree with you
@The_Judge3006 ай бұрын
So you are able to hit the animal totally perfect every single time? And the animal never moves the second you decide to take the shot? You will never hit bones? And your idea of time and time difference between heavy/light arrow is totally flawed. The deer reacts to the sound of your string and your arrow speed is extremely far from the speed of sound, so the deer will beat your arrow, no matter how fast it goes if it decides to duck. And the reality is that the sound from your string with the heavy arrow is not as sharp and that doesn't freak out the deer as much. And there is nothing that blocks the vitals when you use the heavy arrow as it just shoots through it. And I really do not understand your point about the steel tubing. You get the same penetration with a light arrow as you do with a heavy arrow in a foam target as well and what does that mean?
@The_Judge3006 ай бұрын
@@zaynemikita6897 I have been hunting with what the Ranch Fairy has been preaching about for many years before he discovered how it works. He has not made this up or made any serious market at all. And the reality is that it works and it works extremely well. It is just hard for some people to accept it when they are used to believe in all sorts of garbage "pro hunters" have been paid to fill their ears with by the industry. I have used my heavy setup for about 20 years now and I have shot at about 200 big game animals since then and not lost one single of them. And it is pure nonsense that you can't hunt at longer distances with a heavier setup as well. I have killed big animals out to 62 yards with my setup.
@jons7e6 ай бұрын
@@The_Judge300 the point is with modern bows it doesn't take much to get penetration. It's probably closer to 90% broadhead and 10% arrow weight contributing to the best penetration results with your delivery limitations, once you have a tuned bow that doesn't cause the arrow to bleed energy all the way to the target. Momentum matters, but so does time on target, trajectory, and every margin of error reduction opportunity. To put all of your efforts in one basket with complete disregard for the other components of successfully delivering a projectile on a target is misleading. It's different for every shooter because of their setup, the armor of the target, and the distance to cover. There are no solutions, only trade-offs.
@jonah-n8l6 ай бұрын
When I was younger 14-15 yrs old I shot a 40lb pse nova 26” draw with 350grain arrow with a thunder head and zipped through a bunch of whitetail! If u stay away from the ball n socket then good to go
@EricBynog-zd4rd5 ай бұрын
You got 50 percent get out Stone Age and get some FPS compound bows have not advanced in years all of this is the issues compound guys have and try sevr the blades don’t freely wobble when the open they lock in place period now with rage style heads I agree
@dennisrobinson7536 ай бұрын
I shoot a crossbow IBO is 400 at 400 I shoot around 600 grain ,guess my speed would be around 325 maby 350 fps my life as always been plan B I am going for always aclean pass through ,definitely not the best shot so I will shoot a low 600 grain arrow and let the chips and deer fall..
@progradepainting37556 ай бұрын
Youre shooting a crossbow and your worried about plan b what if’s and pass throughs?
@forgerat5 ай бұрын
Fairy says the arrow shaft plugs the hole and prevents tension pneumothorax unless there is a pass thru, explain to me how a .204 arrow plugs a 2”+ hole from a giant cut mechanical….. please explain that.
@progradepainting37555 ай бұрын
@@forgerat that’s a good point.
@steelereels75004 ай бұрын
Maybe not plug but yes anything in the way of that hole is going to obscure blood flow
@forgerat4 ай бұрын
@@steelereels7500or it’s going to catch on brush and gape it open even more. He’s grasping saying stuff like this.
@nickallport18744 ай бұрын
front deploying mechanical that only gets one hole....
@jsienesi4 ай бұрын
Those surgeons he is talking about would have a lot to say about someone sprinting flat out with a 2 inch blade on the end of that rebar still in side them he is referring too......oh forgot about that little detail 😂
@Lucas_Palmer_Archery6 ай бұрын
Good work guys!
@timharrelson77974 ай бұрын
Just watched chris bee wound an animal to death on one of his videos
@EricBynog-zd4rd5 ай бұрын
So funny because there is data that says otherwise the data says heavier arrow only does 2 things first slow the already slow compound bow down second test shows heavier arrow only gained like inch of penetration vs lighter arrow so not sure if all things equal which is better for compound bow but what I do know is ole hidden valley ranch likes to run his mouth about deer ducking and this his slow ass bow maybe but that is the issue with compound bows period there slow why I use a crossbow I don’t have all this bullshit to deal with over 500 FPS and double hidden valleys kinetic energy so when you got 500 FPS you got 142 ft lbs you can use what you want
@EricBynog-zd4rd5 ай бұрын
All that is with a compound bow not a crossbow there is no way also a cross bolt is half the length of arrow talking a 20 inch bolt
@jeffmichel43125 ай бұрын
The 400-450 grain warriors are arrogant. They’re getting paid on that hill and they gotta stand on it and protect it. They are the ones who bully and condescend and belittle anyone for doing anything that’s different from what they want to sell. Just dumb. Heavy is better always. 550 and north.
@79travisdee5 ай бұрын
I just can’t trust a guy that wears a visor
@southgajeeepers24164 ай бұрын
Ha ha no lie the shadiest characters I have known over the years have wore visor’s. The ole whacky fairy knows his shit though. He don’t even like to hunt that much. He just knows he is onto something. I’m Not saying 700 Grains is for everyone and he doesn’t say that but what he does stand by makes sense. No way around it.
@hrmIwonder4 күн бұрын
He screwed up the joke, its an extroverted engineer (or one with personality) looks at *your* shoes when he talks to you instead of at his own.
@jonah-n8l6 ай бұрын
700 Lmmfao 😂😂😂😂 gtfoh
@W_and_K_Archery4 ай бұрын
Troy also talks about anatomy & physiology however he also makes lots of mistakes when trying to explain things (especially when talking about lung funtion with a penetrating object). If you use a 1” two blade head and dont get a pass though, it is possible to partially block the wound channel however most broadheads create a wound channel larger than the arrow diameter (the chances of sealing off the wound channel are slim to none). Majority of folks that go through an RT program get to use a cadaver. Troy does not and has not practiced besides being in school, he sells medical & archery equipment.
@W_and_K_Archery4 ай бұрын
Troy keeps preaching momentum but still refuses to do an equal momentum test. Penetration is 100% KE based, Rocketmans mentor Dr Stephen Bless has already stated this. The reason a heavier arrow has a greater potential is not because of momentum, its inertia (as well as having more KE at impact). You dont get good blood with any 1” single blade broadhead, holes are harder to line up, bigger holes means easier for blood to flow out as well as more tissue disruption leading to higher hemorrhaging…
@forgerat5 ай бұрын
What makes RF think he knows more about animal anatomy than Chris Bee? Chris has killed and gutted and necropsied as many animals as anybody. Thinking he is the expert on game anatomy is pretty fucking bull headed of him. This is why people talk shit about him. He shouldn’t assert his authority as a legend in his own mind.
@gsnicholas85225 ай бұрын
Did you even watch and listen to anything that was said in the video? It sure doesn’t seem like it. Cope harder.
@bigz52625 ай бұрын
Lol you know Chris isn’t taking the time to clean his animals, let alone performing a necropsy. His videos are for entertainment not education
@stephenballard37595 ай бұрын
He has a degree specifically in how the lungs, heart, and the rest of the circularory system work, for one thing.
@forgerat5 ай бұрын
@@stephenballard3759 he a veterinary respiratory therapist?
@stephenballard37595 ай бұрын
@@forgerat I don't think they even have those. But he was a respiratory therapist, and all mammalian systems are very similar.
@killintime84316 ай бұрын
Jesus Christ the ranch fairy 🧚♀️
@bloodlines96106 ай бұрын
Do your own testing. Dont need to take everything the tooth fairy says to heart. 400 grains for me. Complete passthroughs with a 3 blade mechanical broad head. Arrow zips through them.
@HUNTERSADVANTAGE6 ай бұрын
We Tested Ranch Fairy’s Arrow Setup on 6 DEER! | Kill Shots, Testing, & Results kzbin.info/www/bejne/p57OpYGMlrFlq68
@tylereaster42516 ай бұрын
Additionally, the fairy never said a light arrow with a mechanical doesn't work.
@progradepainting37556 ай бұрын
@@HUNTERSADVANTAGEif all you’re doing is shooting from a tree stand at 20 yards, what’s stopping you from using a 1000 grain arrow? I mean, you’re obviously not concerned with arrow flight, you’re only wrapped around the axel about pass throughs. My 9 year old daughter can hit a target all day at 20 yards with pretty much any setup I give her. When it comes to any substantial distance, like in western applications, a 650 grain arrow sucks. It has horrible flight, the cast is ridiculous, and if you miss judge yardage even a little bit, you’re going to completely miss.
@HUNTERSADVANTAGE6 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755 I used a 580 grain arrow not 650. I shot one of those deer at 40+. The arrow flight on that 580 grain arrow was incredible. I paper tuned and nock tuned my bow. Im a curious person. I’ll try anything just to see the results. I’m not jaded at one crowd or the other. Arrow flight, penetration, trajectory, and how far your shoot are all considerations. I’d probably shoot something different for my western setup. Have a good one brother.
@progradepainting37556 ай бұрын
@@HUNTERSADVANTAGEnah, I’m not jaded, just experienced. It’s your ranch fairy buddy who’s jaded, by archery to be precise. That’s why he’s more interested in bass fishing, because he didn’t have it in him to master the ins and outs of archery. I’ve already been up and down the heavy vs. light arrow crap, probably 20 years longer than you have. He couldn’t figure it out, because he doesn’t respect the archery aspect of it. He’s said it himself. He views a bow as an energy transfer device. So he’s missing half the equation. That’s why he’s resorting to ridiculously heavy arrow builds to compensate for poor archery skills. I advocate for the middle ground, as do many other well accomplished archers and bow hunters. There is absolutely no need for a 580 grain arrow on North American game. You base your whole build, off a guy who based his own build, off a guy who hunted outdated equipment, and based his build to hunt African game😂…. The joke really is on you, brother…
@zaynemikita68976 ай бұрын
Just because this guy is charismatic doesn't make him right. Seriously do some research. Plenty of deer and elk killed with 400-460gr arrows with high FOC. That's what is getting arrows through stuff.
@JH-hx2cl6 ай бұрын
Specifically, what research are you doing?
@progradepainting37556 ай бұрын
@@JH-hx2clhow about the plethora of the worlds biggest animals taken by hunters who shoot arrows in high 300-450 grain range? Ever wonder how they’re getting it done, and these other jokers are going backwards to compensate for horrible archery skills? How about researching the art of archery more, and less on arrow weight.
@JH-hx2cl6 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755 why are you so triggered over me asking what kind of research he did? And nothing you just said is research. That claim can be made by 500+grain shooters too so..
@progradepainting37556 ай бұрын
@@JH-hx2cl “why are you so triggered over Me asking what kind of research he did?” Why do you assume that when someone challenges your response they’re“triggered” over anything at all? Were you expecting to have zero engagement with anyone? “And nothing you said is research” Nothing you’ve said is reasearch either. You’re just hyper fixated on arrow weights. When I referenced the “art of archer” that encompasses the entire field of research as it pertains to archery. Arrow weight is super low on the list. “That claim can be made by 500+grain shooters too so..” Yeah, but the issue with that is, your hero, the ranch fairy, doesn’t care about any of that. He’s all about arrow weight, and just considers the bow a delivery device. That’s why he punches the trigger off with no peep sight, and limits himself to 40 yard shots with a modern compound bow, because his delivery device with 600 grain arrows, groups arrows the size of a trash can lid.
@JH-hx2cl6 ай бұрын
@@progradepainting3755 Why do i assume that? Because youre sarcastic in your original response. I was asking what kind of research he did. Saying "Nothing you’ve said is reasearch either..." doesn't make any sense. Why do you assume the ranch fairy is my hero? how are you getting all of this BS from a single question I asked? Youre mental dude. Not to mention looking at this thread you're all over the place, its like the hill you're choosing to die on or something. Relax buddy, keep shooting what you're shooting lol.
@JoshHardin-yq6uk5 ай бұрын
This podcast has turned into one long product shilling commercial/ podcast. It went downhill quick. Sad to see!
@HUNTERSADVANTAGE5 ай бұрын
What do you mean?
@JoshHardin-yq6uk5 ай бұрын
It just seems like every 5 minutes there is a break in the podcast for an ad. I understand you are running a business and some of that is needed to an extent but, coming from a listeners perspective, that is very off putting and turns me away from your channel. I love the content otherwise and feel that it is very informative and worth while to listen to. It’s just the ads man. It’s getting to be too much.
@HUNTERSADVANTAGE5 ай бұрын
@@JoshHardin-yq6uk I see where you are coming from. In a podcast that’s 94 minutes long, there are 4 minutes of ads. That’s 4% of the episode. 96% is just the meat and potatoes of the content. Maybe, putting them at different places could be an option to not break the episode up as much, but like you said. We are running a business and making sure the production quality of the episodes is high has costed us 5 figures in equipment. We are always trying to make the show better and appreciate the feedback man. And we hope you will continue to listen.