Rare earths crunch? Why we need them and who has them | Business Beyond

[@河田陽介-x7d]

I was involved in a job from the Government of Japan, but I think there are few rare earth deposits that are superior to the adsorption deposits in China. It has a high concentration and is only adsorbed, so it can be easily extracted with acid. A promising by-product is the rare earths contained in the niobium deposits in Brazil. However, the drawback is that the target Nd, Dy, Sm, etc. cannot be separated and extracted unless La and Ce are separated. I think we need to focus on recycling rare earths. (by Google transulation) From Japan, Y. Kawata

[@JA-pn4ji]

Google's done a great job in translating your comment because it is not only understandable but also in good English.

[@GEOsustainable]

How do you make money recycling? If it could be a profit, there would be more. We are simply talking about the things that will cause our extinction. No one recycles, not even YOU.

[@eveleung8855]

According to my understanding, the so call rare Earth actually isn't all that rare, they are very abundant around the world, however, to mime them required not only special technology, as well as the mine will produce large environmental destruction or terrible pollution, many countries dose not want the mining process to carry out in their own country, like the US for example, they are sitting on a very large deposits of rare Earth, but can the US afford to sacrifice their environment for the mining process? Then the next step is the refinery process, the process also extremely polluting, many countries also dose not want the refinery process within their own country, only China willing to do it , and they did it for so many years, they have the most experience in this area, and holds the most technology patent for all sorts of rare mineral refinery, Japan also has some, but not as much as China. Any other country wish to develop the refinery process, it will require 10 - 15 years infrastructures and technology development, Donald Trump was planning to develop it, but the time and money investment was the biggest obstacle, it never happen.

[@nickoletarvanites4119]

Domo aregato for sharing your story 🌺

[@adoatero5129]

@@eveleung8855 That's all true, but you practically repeated what was said on the video.

[@rustyyb8450]

Almost anyone can mine them. It's just messy refining them. China has taken on that messy refining and done it for a low price squelching the competition.

[@jethsemane]

'They're not actually rare.' Lanthanum and cerium are the only ones that are abudant but the more important ones like gadolinium and neodymium are rare AF

[@jadetycoonjadeite4034]

Who are not even rare somalia got it all

[@sdprz7893]

@@jadetycoonjadeite4034 Somalia doesn't have the infrastructure necessary to make it a viable place to invest

[@jadetycoonjadeite4034]

@@sdprz7893 it's not what you think don't trust media it's perfect to invest and place to open minerals opportunity

[@sdprz7893]

@@jadetycoonjadeite4034 lol i'm somali myself and no its not

[@cam5816]

@@sdprz7893 Lmfao 😂

[@kinngrimm]

What i will never get (behind) is how we often seem to grab what we can lay our hands on, but then don't give a second thought onto what we leave behind. No matter if you are a company gathering ressources or a company making products from those ressources. You have to responsibly take care of your waste. If you don't you shall be shut down and sold for your parts.

[@kukulroukul4698]

oh , give me a F break please :)))) Chinese hunted rinocerous to the extinction

[@vilas69]

Pollution, waste and environment destruction are externalities in this amazing economic system we call capitalism...

[@elonever.2.071]

@@vilas69 It isnt just capitalism. China right now is the worst at environmental destruction and pollution and they are not capitalistic. It is a symptom of corporate greed...profits at any cost.

[@vilas69]

@@elonever.2.071 can't take you seriously if you say something like "China is not capitalist"...

[@elonever.2.071]

@@vilas69 The CCP owns everything in China. How is that capitalist.

[@paulrickenbaker]

In the US we can find this in Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, South Dakota, etc. The hard part of "rare earth" materials is the processing. It's water and chemicals.

[@WealthTransferTC]

ARRNF American Rare Earth

[@ashleylittle6776]

Fact is rare earth minerals got thier name because they were originally called rarely mined earth minerals. They are not remotely rare. What is rare is the number of economic mines around the would that mine these minerals!

[@katejudson8907]

Thank you. Good point.

[@silverbird425]

The problem is the amount of rare earth per square foot - unless something else is mined along with it you make a big hole for a very small amount of material. Economic isn't the only problem - a mine for rare earths is very wasteful, and messy if you don't bother to follow good protocol.

[@marczhu7473]

And latest rare earth refining patent + industry is in China hand.😂

[@philj9681]

There are three things people overlook when talking about rare earth elements. 1. In general, yes, the rare earth elements are not really rare. However, the heavy rare earth elements are rare and as far as we know, most of them are located in China, more specifically, the Jiangxi Province. This is probably a god-blessed gift for China. 2. China is the patent monopoly in this industry. It holds way more patents than the rest of the world, which creates a huge barrier for others to enter the game. 3. China's real tech advantage is in processing those minerals. China is the largest rare element exporter, but a big portion of the export actually comes from processing imported raw minerals.

[@DK-001]

@@silverbird425 Ya gotta do what ya gotta do! Can't let China dominate the industry!

[@kuncahyomoenasir7816]

Indonesia is the biggest deposit of Nickel and Cobalt in the world in the form of laterit, but most refinerIes belong to China (investor from China), to not dependent of China in this comodity, I think Eropean or American companies should come to indonesia to build refineries.

[@eveleung8855]

The American or the European don't have the technology for it, also the refinery is extremely environmental polluting, the mining process already brings terrible pollution to your country, if you also have the refinery, I cannot image what your country going to be.

[@CoachYIF]

Congo has the biggest deposit of cobalt

[@CoachYIF]

Its good to be proud but lying is bad.

[@jaybee4577]

Congo have the largest mineral deposits in the world especially cobalt.

[@criessmiles3620]

Thank you for pointing out his rubbish 🦅

[@Promotall]

not listened to this, but at a guess it is probably another disco documentary

[@alexlo7708]

China exported rare earth to German since pre WWII. That's why German helped China built up new soldier system then. At the time UK &US Anglo empire had embargo German any logistics materials including rare earth. US has abundant of rare earth but they lack huge water resource in extracting them. Also US is always printing dollars. That is why it is not interested in producing its own like when its dollar was not international trade currency.

[@Joker-no1uh]

Have you not heard of the great lakes?

[@alexlo7708]

@@Joker-no1uh American rare earth abundant are accumulated in western coast states, They lack of water.

[@王班超]

二战时，美国给德国出口了绝大多数的战略资源，所以战后德国的科学家都去了美国，是这个意思吗？😊

[@Hallettjs7957]

Little known fact: Two US led geological surveys were conducted shortly before the US invaded Afghanistan. They found one of the largest deposits in the world of Lithium. These is also the same deposits China seeks to mine under contracts made after the US left last year in 2021. So was the length of the war deliberate?

[@noticing33]

Duh, but the dumbos thought it be good to have the worlds most corrupt government doing their bidding lol

[@noticing33]

Nkw they lost that to likley China

[@wilsonjudson1650]

The market crash prediction has been going for months now, imagine if you've invested heavily then. The truth is no one actually knows if the crash is gonna happen. some said it will happen immediately after the election, hello we're done with the election now. You just have to invest smartly . I'm glad it worked for me with the help of an investment advisor, I recently added my $35k profits to my portfolio.

[@jamesmaduabuchi6100]

Speculation is always bad when it looks easy just like the crash.

[@jessicamamikina7648]

I heavily missed out on going into the market during the lockdown.

[@wilsonjudson1650]

The real secret of building wealth is by having multiple streams of income. That includes both online and offline investments.

[@dorissteve912]

I'm new to the stock market, learned so much already online and obsessing atm, i need monitoring and guidance as i'm desperate to get into investing now, please can you share more info about your investment advisor?

[@wilsonjudson1650]

i trade with TERESA JENSEN WHITE

[@tomkelly8827]

I think that this discussion needs to include the right to repair. Apple is the worst for that. They do not allow you to repair your I phone, no wonder they had so much rare earths on hand! The best rare earth you can find is the one that is already making your phone, computer, etc work. We need to repair more and throw out less

[@ganaspin]

Exactly! Have you ever thought about why America so much stimulates this throw-out-and-buy-a-new-one culture? One main reason is: buy stimulating consumers to buy a new one instead of repairing the one they currently have, you artificially create market demand for new products and that implies in a stronger economy overall, since all the actors in the supply chain will be required again. I'm not defending this model, it's the opposite, I'm very critic of it. The average american consumes way more than the global average. That's in part what makes their economy strong and competitive, but it leaves such a ecological burden that it's not even close to sustainable. If we are serious about letting people from all nations thrive and have a proper lifestyle, with access to basic needs like water and electricity, then the US needs to give up on this exorbitant and reckless lifestyle.

[@stevendefehr4393]

A very well done video to help open peoples eyes ! I live in western Canada. We have a very good speaker on this subject. His name is Michael Campbell . He does a podcast style talk every Saturday. His show is called Michael Campbell's Money Talks . He explains how governments around the world have no honest plan on how we can ever get to renewable energy. Lotsa fun … lots to talk about… always looking for ways to profit from this as well 😀

[@PG-3462]

Actually there are plans, but governments can't solve all problems by magic 🤦‍♂️ Everyone need to do their, for example by reducing their energy consumption.

[@rareearthsinvestor9802]

Recycling will account for more and more RE feedstock as we start to drown in end-of-life EV motors/magnets and wind turbines, etc. Further, we will see alternative extraction methods, presently basic research, arrive. However, none of this will arrive in time to negate the need now for traditional mining and processing of critical metals, if we are to diversify supply chains, move towards claimed Climate Change goals and allow for global competition within the new energy economy, which is arriving now.

[@richardivonen3564]

One of the human races inherent qualities is our ability to make solving problems more difficult than it ought to be because of our laziness and greed. Willful ignorance also comes into play.

[@clashking9710]

recycling isnt cost effective at all at the moment. For everyone who is interested in this rare earth topic I really recommend the book "THE RARE METALS WAR" from Guillaume Pitron

[@dehsa38]

There could come a time when cost effective is beside the point, if you're going to continue with the industry.

[@paintedturtlemine42]

I went to college for environmental science and found a large deposit of monazite, Hematite, Magnetite, and pyrites on my families properties. I want to try and help figure out how to remove the minerals safely. I figured out how to remove the metals.

[@bunzeebear2973]

@ 3:14 it show the distribution of rare earth minerals around the world. China does not lead with amount of rare earth minerals(and this is what we have found to date.) Either we figure out how to mine in a less destructive way or we do without until a new compound can be made that is BETTER THAN the rare earth element. CHEMISTRY.

[@nsevv]

Japan already using alternative to rare earth after China sanctioned Japan.

[@epincion]

Excellent review

[@christryst]

They're not that rare. The US and Australia have plenty for example, only political and strategic complacency has seen China corner the majority of the market.

[@SmokeyStoner]

Do you have proof of what you are saying? Manybe a link to this information so we can all see.

[@JA-pn4ji]

Not exactly true because concentrations in rare earth deposits differ across the world and the production process not only involves intellectual property but economies of scale which the Chinese have cornered.

[@christryst]

@@JA-pn4ji That's a good point, which is why government intervention to ensure a supply independent of the CCP regime would be prudent.

[@christryst]

China's gov classed REEs as strategic as early as the 70s. The US woke up under Trump in 2017 after producing none in the 00s.

[@eveleung8855]

LMAO, the refining process of the rare Earth is extremely polluting, many countries including the US or any European countries are not willing to sacrifice their environment for the refining process, China took the challenge, develop this refining process and technology over a long period of time, huge sacrifice and huge investment, today China holds the most technology patent of this process, not because China controls the market, but they are the biggest exporter of rare Earth, about 80-90%, Japan is the second largest exporter, no one stop anyone to invest in this rare Earth refinery process, it only takes huge amount of time for infrastructure and technology development, about 10-15 years, also require sacrifice of their country 's environment, if your country do not want to do it, stop blaming China for exporting most of the rare Earth, also no one force anyone to buy from China, buy from the Japanese if you want to!

[@hemingwayrohan]

I can’t understand why Europe doesn’t recycle more of the rare earths in materials already used and are currently redundant! Most households have phones, computers and alike that can be recycled. Unfortunately, the consumer has little incentive to recycle because of the low return in putting them forward for recycling!

[@PG-3462]

Europe doesn't recycle as much as it should because consumers prefer quantity over quality. If you want to produce more, then you need to reduce the quality of the raw materials and production processes

[@hemingwayrohan]

@@PG-3462 Thank you for the reply! A point I had not recognised before!

[@davidtindell950]

Thank you ! "Welle" DONE !!

[@blackhole3298]

I just want to tell people that the term rare earth is extremely misleading. Every chemistry major knows that. The term rare refers to the once hard time to extract them. They do not occur in nature in pure form like some metals, they occur as compounds, often together with other materials. These elements are not rare at all!!!!! Just were once hard to obtain and purify. Also there are alot of rare earths that are in europe. We actually mine some here in europe. So the title screen map was misleading too.

[@GEOsustainable]

Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[@savannahmiddlefield616]

And make lots of poisonous by product too. That is why developed countries don’t do it and find developing countries to do it. Just like non-recycle plastic, developed countries recycle higher recyclable like aluminum, ship off the tons of non-recyclable plastic with little recyclable plastic to pay the developing countries to deal with (get poisoned).

[@blackhole3298]

@GN28 Do not get me wrong, I still call em that, but the title is rare earth crunch.

[@bolsa3136]

They say just that at @3:00

[@peanutnutter1]

Perhaps watch the video before commenting.

[@cinemaipswich4636]

Apart from Europe and North America, the only other stable place to get your rare earths (and every other resource) is Australia. They seem to have everything that the world needs.

[@orangecookie3132]

You forgot about South America

[@Vmb07]

Australia is the 4th largest producer of rare earths after China, US and Myanmar

[@paulfri1569]

Lots of people jealous of Australia. Must be annoying also that Australia is flattest nation on earth and making it cheaper to process. Just adds salt to wound..

[@paulfri1569]

@@orangecookie3132 too much jungle and too mountainous.. adds to costs..

[@zhoubaidinh403]

@@paulfri1569 Stop exporting coal, iron ore, minerals and accelerating climate change...plant some gd trees!

[@thenaturechannel_]

where can we find pricing charts for these rare earth metals

[@shiptj01]

I like how simplifying our lives and the economy isn't even an option.

[@PistonAvatarGuy]

Capitalism is god... apparently.

[@shiptj01]

@@PistonAvatarGuy Apparently.

[@KJSvitko]

Relying on China or Russia for your supply chain is risky. Diversify, diversify, diversify suppliers.

[@isabelzhang6194]

Or you can be friends with them and holding some technologhy or resources they dont have. There are always alternative ways to think about /deal with things. Its called economic globalization. 😂

[@KJSvitko]

@@isabelzhang6194 Both are great at stealing intellectual property, spreading disinformation to weaken their opponents and hacking the internet. There is no free speech, rule of law, property rights or freedom of movement.

[@lunthang7453]

If you rely to much from US, you will get sanction

[@thomaszhang3101]

Go diversity rare earth metal supply, I dare you 😂 What are you going to do? Snap rare earth mines out of thin air?

[@k.k.c8670]

Relying on the US as a friend or foe for ANYTHING is often fatal.

[@SteelFabricator-os7sx]

You know your old when the periodic chart had grown with elements you didn't know existed

[@lerwenliu9263]

excellent educational content and analysis

[@j.dunlop8295]

Cheaper to recycle than extract, some are saying, chemistry!

[@simonlinser8286]

wouldn't it be ironic if we found out that the presence of these elements contribute to the fecundity of crops, and through their isolation we end up harming the productivity of agriculture? some people believe there are elements that contribute to health but we cannot measure their physiological impact because they occur in such minute quantities within the body that they are contained in the bones from the gestational period and only in cases of severe disease would they need to be replaced. that's right there's elements given from your mother's womb. some elements the roles of which we are not able to measure and quantify in human physiology as of yet. maybe they are not necessary but maybe they enhance or contribute to cognition or other survivable traits, if they create these seemingly magic effects within semi conductors who's to say they do not contribute towards our own processes. food for thought.

[@noticing33]

No one cares tho

[@miltonbates6425]

We need to have a regulated taxation system built on a fast, efficient, immutable, DLT like Hedera Hashgraph to ensure that rare earth suppliers are meeting their environmental obligations.

[@rodtukker1904]

What is the use while the military burns more than ever? NATO fleet emissions are almost as huge as Germany even during peacetime and no one cares.

[@davidsoulsby1102]

Tax Tax Tax.......🤦‍♂️

[@eveleung8855]

Should you do that your technology development will be slow like a turtles, our world is powered by fossil fuel, but our electrianic device and machine cannot functional without rare Earth, from airplane to setilliets, from military missile system to our smartphone, rare Earth is need it almost everywhere! The biggest country that exporting refined rare Earth is China, next is Japan, there is no such thing you can set a regulation how to control the pollution during process, good luck with your regulation, when you have huge out of stock high tech parts due to your silly regulation, don't cry when your dryer cost you like 100 times more, but then of course you can always hang your clothes to dry and hand washing your clothes 😂

[@GEOsustainable]

Sounds good. Are you working on doing that?

[@davidsoulsby1102]

@@eveleung8855 And you wonder why people don't trust you when you make comments like this.

[@andersolsen1478]

The sea covers most of the Earth and the rare metals can also be found and mined in the sea. Look at the metals company, which is trying to start up sea mining of rare metals.

[@alexlo7708]

Rare earth are not dissoved in water. So it may deposit on undersea mud. And its harder to extract.

[@andersolsen1478]

@@alexlo7708 yes it has to be mined from the sea bottom. The Metals Company are using Deep-sea drill vessels which are built for deep sea drilling after oil and gas. They have mud pumps and risers, which can carry the cuttings up to the vessel, where it can be collected and / or sorted before transported onshore.

[@alexlo7708]

@@andersolsen1478 So this process cost will skyrocket as same as those who try digging ice methane and pulling up from sea bottom.

[@thenaturechannel_]

what is the all in cost of extracting 1 pound of rare earth metal

[@davieslungu4577]

My country Zambia has rare earth's deposits. What the country needs is to mine and process them, but also for the country to use these rare earth's into components or invite companies to set up factories to make the components so that Zambia can become an exporter of the components instead of being an exporter of the rare earths.

[@bensondube]

Hi Davies, I am interested to know whereabouts are the rare earths in Zambia? Who are the key players if they are already being extracted?

[@noahway13]

Yes, don't destroy your environment like China did. The amount of contamination and pollution is outrageous and partially hidden and is going to cripple China for decades. Look it up if you are interested. Crazy stuff. Good thing the US has the EPA and the one political party has not been able to eliminate it.

[@spaghettigod43]

@@bensondube You don't have the labor force or the security needed for these factories and industrial plants. It's not as simple as opening up a factory. Infrastructure has to be built. You needed a educated labor force. You need political and economical stability. Etc etc.

[@nickl5658]

My country had one of the largest rare earth refineries in Asia in the 1980s and we the people have regretted it for next 40 years. The town the refinery was located became a hot spot for cancer and birth defects. And yes... despite large public protest, we against host the largest rare earth refinery outside china... and will regret it for the next 50 years to come. Number of people in the refinery is 300. REE deposits are not rare. What is rare is nations willing to host a refinery. The ore will happily come by bulk ore ship.

[@noticing33]

True, the amount miners make is abysmal. Government needs to increase prices to pat higher wages. But too much corruption I guess

[@sararichardson737]

Thank you DW.

[@phil20_20]

It's not that China was the only source. It was that they were subsidizing labor, and our politicians were more than willing to look the other way whilst their stocks grew in value.

[@emanuelsommar7243]

So are all the woke who buy the stuff... It's worthless unless you have buyers. So who is really at fault here the woke or the rich feeding off the woke ?

[@jamesnguyen7069]

the environment

[@emanuelsommar7243]

@@jamesnguyen7069 WOW.. Inciteful reply... That grade two education is really paying off.

[@rcbrascan]

In the West, tax incentives is subsidized labor. There is no such thing as tax incentives in China.

[@AG-GA]

!!! Be friend with China is the best way !!! WIN WIN Else pay fair price for environment protect fee + pollution recover fee from historic interest till now + human rights justice fee ... will then a fair deal. TO whom scrified the most to gain to own the most. UNIVERSE RULE OF LAW. Don't be naive or jealous.

[@kenshultz2664]

When there is not enough rare earth elements, and not enough food or water, or oil, then it seems that there are to many humans on our fragile planet

[@noticing33]

Greed always destroys

[@ursulawayne9384]

Replacing the need for rare earth with non toxic technology would be a blessing for all Creation.

[@The_Savage_Wombat]

What are knock on effects?

[@royj4359]

The West: we won’t sell China any high tech they need. Also the West: how dare China limit rare earth supply to us !?

[@peabase]

Any high tech? Apart from an arms embargo (issued to discourage the CCP from killing its own people), it's Huawei and other entities with a connection to the Chinese military that are being banned from using certain high tech, and then only by the US. Try to stick to the facts, buddy.

[@royj4359]

@@peabase lol your joke made my day🤣 The biggest invader, war criminal and genocide country in human history suddenly cares about the Chinese people? Do you know the US is behind countless terrorism attacks in China? Do you know CIA still couldn’t find any evidence of huawei’s connection with military, and it was the US gov who where found eavesdropping it allies(lapdogs)? Oh may be you don’t, because you never cared news you don’t like. Watch less Captain America and learn more about real world, boy. The truth is, whenever a Chinese industry has the potential to surpass it US counterpart, no matter it’s smart phone, 5G, cotton or solar panel, the US will fabricate some excuses to crack down that Chinese industry. The US simply cannot allow the Chinese people to live good lives as the Americans.

[@peabase]

@@royj4359 You're the joke here. You cannot hold a conversation like a civilised person. I did not take a position on whether the US high tech sanctions against China are justified or not. However, they are real. What I wrote is 100% fact. I'm not even American, so your puerile whataboutism is doubly misplaced.

[@royj4359]

@@peabase who said anything about your nationality, boy? You THOUGHT what you said is 100% true, and I was just telling you it’s not. It was you who cannot hold a conversation. Yes the US sanctions against China are real (and it forces all its lapdog countries to follow its sanction), but the reasons are joke. The truth is, whenever a Chinese industry has the potential to surpass it’s us counterpart (like 5G, cotton, solar panel or social media), the US gov will fabricate some excuses (information security, genocide, human right…) to sanction that Chinese industry. The US gov said itself that it cannot allow the Chinese people to live good quality of lives like the Americans.

[@peabase]

@@royj4359 You were lambasting the West, as if we're blocking _all_ high tech exports to China. I pointed out that apart from arms exports, it's only the US that's at it, and only selectively. Are you mentally challenged? What is it with you wumaos? You immediately break out in diatribes against the US no matter what the topic at hand happens to be. You have an unhealthy fixation with the US that clearly impairs your objectivity.

[@janschezant4747]

The truth is, rare earth are pretty common all over earth. The fact is, some nations are way ahead of mining them than other nations. All advancement of technology especially mine products have always a footprints of devastations. The solution is to be a responsible miner. All gorvernment knows all of this, the problem is, most company/miners are always profit first which means less responsible ways of mining.

[@Alex-pj8nz]

Basically it’s like Iron, China can make stainless steel from iron ore while Europe can only make cast iron.

[@jeffbenton6183]

@@Alex-pj8nz What? Europe can't make steel? Please tell me more, I find that hard to believe EDIT: I think he means during the time of the Roman Empire. The Silk Road also traded a bunch of steel, because the Romans thought that steel came from higher carbon iron ore, not a process to add carbon to the iron during the forging process.

[@Bk6346]

Rare earths are everywhere but mineable concentrations are indeed rare.

[@pete10458]

Thanks for summarizing the video’s content

[@KJSvitko]

Everything needs to be recycled. No single use products should be made. All products should be made with the idea that the materials will eventually be recycled.

[@konyaku3072]

Next round of empirialism would start in next 50 years for rare earth metal.

[@medialcanthus9681]

Where is it that China is always one step ahead? The others are "if we do" or "if only we had done" or "even if".

[@Captain.Pugwash]

Because they're inscrutable. They cannot be scruted.

[@user-wv3zc6br6s]

They were a good band. Get Ready was a a smash hit.🇺🇸😅

[@fleur7891]

Makes better sense than 'climate change'🙄😉

[@manimalworks7424]

You failed to mention that China graduates over 100 PhD students in rare earth processing, and in US as well as Germany? Nil.

[@colingenge9999]

Discussing the pollution caused by Rare Earth or any other materials used to provide renewable energy is meaningless unless we compare renewables to fossil fuels. My intuitive guess is that we will reduce global pollution by 99% by eliminating fossil fuels. Just because that is not 100% does not mean that we should not go in that direction. Switching off fossil fuels is already a cheaper option but aside from the economics, Fossil Fuels have dominated and corrupted every government on Earth. Most conflict globally would not be occurring if each country was close to self sufficient in energy. Much ado has been made of Cobalt and its unethical sourcing. Recently, Tesla started making half its cars with Lithium Iron Phosphate which has zero Cobalt. I have not made a quantitative assesment of Fossil Fuel pollution in the US but fracking alone has destroyed much of the groundwater in every State that allows fracking. How does that compare to a few pounds of Lithium going into an EV? The authors of these videos are either intentionally or incompetently not making this comparison between renewables and fossil fuels. It’s almost as if a solution must be 100% perfect otherwise we’re gonna stick with fossil fuels that we know will for sure destroy Humanity. Having read most of the comments here, I appear to be the only person requiring this comparison be made in order for these discussions to have any meaning whatsoever. What are your thoughts?

[@deniseproxima2601]

If you have a high density of inhabitants and someone use the groundwater to mining and to clean the components, you will be with cars but without habitants in the future.

[@colingenge9999]

@@deniseproxima2601 Mining hurts surface water primarily while fracking natural gas goes through the ground water layer where most leaks hydraulic fracking fluid directly into the groundwater as it passes through that layer.

[@deniseproxima2601]

@@colingenge9999 I didn't write anything about fracking or to lobby it.

[@deniseproxima2601]

@@colingenge9999 To mine you need chemicals to wash it out. It goes in the ground water without filter or in the water circle.

[@colingenge9999]

@@deniseproxima2601 The question is not whether rare earths as used in EVs cause pollution but what is the comparison between EVs and gas car wrt how much pollution is created. Eventually EVs will all be powered by renewable so my Tesla will require 8 pounds of Lithium which can be recycled for thousands of years. My car should easily last 1,000,000 Km vs a gas car at about 250,000. So the gas car will created 320,000 pounds of Carbon Dioxide which causes global warring, 4,000 pounds of particulates which cause cancer, 4000 pounds of nitrous oxides that cause ephezyma, and a lot of VOX that cause liver damage. Additionally the extraction of those Fossil Fuels will causes tons of Methane to be produced which is many times more powerful towards global warming than CO2. At the end virtually none of the gas car is recycled and 100s of pounds of engine oil is dumped. On sum, I agree that a rare earths cause pollution but the alternative we live with now is roughly 1000 times worse.

[@skmplanet9591]

Valuable information

[@navylaks2]

I love what is required to save the earth from one disaster will cause it's demise in another 🙃🙃

[@ChannelNews1]

It's really a distinction without a difference. Even if they were infinite, the environmental impact from mining them would be catastrophic. Espcailly all that is required especially for the goofy forecasts of converting to electric cars.

[@Thomass7586]

Let us all return to the 1970's. I would love it and stay there.

[@alexinness]

Thank you, I enjoyed watching this piece.

[@luiszarate6442]

It’s more than obvious that the world has changed a lot, commentators never saw before on TV documentarian speaking with all kind of accent.

[@John-ci8yk]

Thank you and thumbs up.

[@nathanielanderson4898]

The United States better get motivated. We can't rely on other nations to supply what we need for energy. We must be self sufficient for our energy needs.

[@iqbalsohel9166]

yeah rather spending money for war...in the name of democracy.. i agree americans should work hard in real sense. just printing unlimited money wont work in long run. specially when money use as weapon ..

[@richardivonen3564]

@@iqbalsohel9166 If you fully understand the consequences of the war in Ukraine and say what you have stated in your post, then you are a shill in Putins employ. Nice try, but no cigar.

[@jamesnguyen7069]

when we have humanoids as our labor my guy

[@minhvu7256]

So rare earth is like gold, gold is everywhere but to extract them is very hard and to find large amount of concentration is even harder to find. That's why it's rare. Correct me if I am wrong

[@ASkippingRock]

Around the 8:00 minute mark is one of the most accurate comments I have heard on globalism.

[@guru47pi]

I really don't see this as a big issue long term. Yes, for the next few years it's literally the only thing that China has a strategic resource over. Long term, minor tariffs and more mine sites in the rest of the world will balance this. In 5-10 years, this will not matter. The situation with cobalt is far more concerning. If/when the DRC collapses, we're out the only global cobalt source.

[@Crow-gg5se]

It’s not that people need these rare earth minerals, it is that people desire these rare earth minerals. There is a fundamental difference in terms. Another word for desire is covet, and as Dr. Lecter told us, we covet what we see. There is a game being played between combatants, but the combatants are not who they appear to be.

[@josephmarzullo]

We are using them inefficiently. We should eradicate the corrupt governments so that the people can prosper.

[@TMM-N]

Talk is cheap From your photo, you are naive

[@richardivonen3564]

Who gets the privilege of deciding which governments are corrupt and have to be overturned? One problem is that most revolutionaries don't have the skills that are necessary for competent governance.

[@bcm-n7244]

I have a question, that will not affect us or a few future generations, after the oil and the rare earths go away what happens to humanity then? ... i'm guessing in 100+ years from now ... will recycleble technologies be so good that you can get all of your material investment back ?

[@wokeaf1337]

Rare earths dont go away, we will improve the recycling ability for those and oil and gas are finite, we have to move away from it as a source of energy and that yesterday since we are destroying our environment which is needed for our survival. We as a species have to survive with alternative energy resources until we get to a point were we master nuclear fusion which can be in 50 y or 100y or 1000y, that will solve mankinds energy issue once and for all.

[@bcm-n7244]

@🖤 वेदम् 🖤 I agree you should watch the expanse or read the books if you haven't.

[@eveleung8855]

@@wokeaf1337 but the question is, who willing to sacrifice their environment to recycle the rare Earth? The US and Europe constantly sent their electronic waste to other 3rd world countries, why? Because they are extremely polluting, if your world do not even want the electronic waste to be place within your own country, how are you going to recycle your precious rare Earth?

[@wokeaf1337]

@@eveleung8855 That is why i said we will have to improve the recycle ability, in Europe they already do not send any old mobile phones anywhere except for recycling purpose because of the rare earth parts.

[@richardivonen3564]

@@wokeaf1337 When critical resources run dry future generations will have to fight their wars using 18th century technology.

[@epicmatter3512]

Rare Earth reserves are not equivalent to the amount of Rare Earth metals available to mine. Reserves are the amount of minerals economically viable to mine, but with new technology the U.S. could have the largest rare earth reserves by a large margin.

[@marczhu7473]

New one mainly patented by China 🇨🇳😂🤔

[@coolproducer3074]

same technology can be used to find metals anywhere,so no,not yet

[@timromayale3018]

No way not possible

[@NeostormXLMAX]

@@marczhu7473 amerimutts will steal like they always do

[@bruceli9094]

@@marczhu7473 Australia has replaced China in many critical minerals. Vietnam soon too 😂

[@bdb3350]

"China is importing more rare earth stock than they export." This strategy is both economic and militarily based. The reason they are doing this is because they know the rest of the countries will have difficulty keeping up with demand, they will be able to hold the world hostage.

[@ssrae-2229]

... so the world is , will , and be taking advantage of China many times: Good or Bad also blame China HOW CONVENIENT ::

[@calvyncraven1141]

Only the west is holding countries at hostage. Gun point! Literally.

[@bdb3350]

@@cinpeace353 Its economic and strategic investment. You import more manufacturing resources than you export or need. Sure this will cost you on the front end of the plan. Then when governments create a "shortage" China is more than happy to sell their resource supplies at a premium rate.

[@noahway13]

It is hard to believe that many countries, mainly the US vs China, are talking so aggressively and flexing military muscle when you see how dependent we are on each other. We have house of cards that anyone can destroy.

[@peternguyen2323]

What China didn't copy nor stole the western knowledge to refine rare earth metals but methodically built and invested in this niche industry? It's like they had a forethought in doing this policy. Stop discussing the positive and negative! Just do it or don't!

[@jrt4585]

And people will be happy when areas are denuded of essential trees?

[@robertsmith8629]

And USA Will invade your country in the name of democracy for these rare earth 😂

[@antiChinazi]

ruSSia thugs won’t lol

[@silverbird425]

Don't be silly. The U.S. and Australia have reserves of rare earths. It's the big mess and expense involved in refining and extracting that's the problem. Mining so much land is messsyyyy and trying to do it in another country is way too much trouble.

[@HOHLfmly]

This “war” has been going on for months. Back in July 2023, China imposed restrictions on gallium and germanium. (Gallium is used to produce heat-resistant semiconductor wafers; germanium is used as a semiconductor.) In November 2023, China introduced restrictions on the export of graphite , a mineral widely used in electric vehicle batteries.

[@Gk-og7ig]

One problem solution is another problem 🤩 So just live simple as possible as 🤩🤩🤩 M .gandhiji said early century

[@MagnetOnlyMotors]

The world has to be careful and diligent .

[@markberryhill2715]

I love Stephanie Sy! She is a princess!

[@ganaspin]

It angers me a lot that, here in Brazil, when you propose market regulation and measures to give the country more geopolitical autonomy, you are called a communist and the so called liberals say the market should never be artificially regulated by the state. But when it's the US or the EU doing it, the same so called liberals don't have any objections to make. Why? Why everytime a developing nation interferes in the market to gain a better strategic position it is called communist and anti-democratic, but if it is the developed nations doing the same, then it's alright?

[@skepticalgenious]

:47 that is a sick state of mind in my opinion. To want to harm others in any way. Versus working either symbiotic or commensalistic. Sure it a lesser path of harm. But it's still in the mentality you vs me or us.

[@enfredlindstrom6763]

canada has any thing that the world needs so spend your money here in canada .we have 90 of the fresh water and most of the worlds food and fuel and more land for each person then any country in the world. and more trees then any other country to

[@jatochgte]

In Chile, the plan is to extract the clay to treat it in a plant with a closed and continuous circuit, so there will be no runoff, the company says. This seal of care for the environment of BioLantánidos is already known in the main purchasing companies in the world.

[@Shadowwalker1717]

In other words America in future will decide to bring democracy to Chile

[@chilbiyito]

​@@Shadowwalker1717they already did

[@junglesuperstar9270]

@@Shadowwalker1717 they already did . Hahaha

[@guidosillaste4297]

Has any1 told you that most rare earth minerals are difficult and enviormentaly damaging to mine in large quantity. Now were demanded to mine more of it at large quantity for some ill gotten profit. Some enviormentaly friendly goals these are. Oh and were supposed to do it whilt being hungry and sick yeah great future.

[@reniexabbu7993]

i am wondering what the impact is going to be because money is taking priority over responsibility the impact is totally unknown to most and its not easy to research and get answers to questions like how will the removal of these elements disrupt the planets magnetic feild, considering they are used to generate magnetic fields its a reasonable question

[@mastrochristo]

Yes, in the near future rare earths will be more powerful than media..

[@izdotcarter]

What’s the name of the writer?

[@PhilipWong55]

It's not clear how China is compelling the USA to buy rare earth from China. Imposing a 1000 percent tariff on rare earth imports may provide enough incentive to encourage domestic mining and processing. This arrangement could be considered a win-win for both nations: the US gains total control over rare earth within its borders and earns extra tax revenues, while China has fewer resource depletion and environmental issues to deal with. However, a 1000 percent duty may not be a sufficient incentive to encourage domestic processing; an initial 2000 percent duty would be better. Since the production is for domestic consumption and that of its allies, there is no prospect of increasing the scale of production to reduce the price to compete with China. Start using Thorium Molten Salt Reactors to simultaneously make thorium valuable, address climate change issues, and solve the spent nuclear waste problem.

[@ГригорийПетров-ю2ш]

I am Russian and I will tell you the following, do not worry about rare earth elements. according to your experts, the share of production of elements for clean energy plants is less than 10%. this means that the extraction of rare earth elements should increase by 10 times, the amount of energy on clean energy should also increase by 10 times. this is a huge expense and a lot of time. to this it is worth adding 90% of tire production in Europe are components from Russian gas, you refuse this, but the wheels cannot be changed to wood, all the increase in traffic is now a problem. We wonder every day, at first - why you stop the work of your factories, and then why we did not open such at home. I don't touch politics, only economics. All our people have become bad in a month and I stop being surprised when I see what you are doing at home, I have no evil, I'm just trying to understand you, but I don't see the logic to discuss the number of places of extraction of rare earth elements if there is nowhere to process them into goods.

[@Miamcoline]

Incredibly interesting. Really important report and thank you for this. Really really good.

[@bhubestakesoponsatien1143]

Very good , search for alternatives for better Business Competion etc........and self sufficient later

[@nenamart5272]

Can you imagine the day they come across a comet full of rare minerals. Darn musk and bests will be all over this adventure.

[@Dovid2000]

I have heard that stibium (Sb), also known as Antimony, is one of those rare earth minerals sought after by the US. Having lived in Yemen, I have since heard that there is a mountain in the central parts of that country where stibium is found aplenty. The area in Yemen where stibium is found is called Jebel Hadl-lesi, in Balad Hada. Perhaps now is the time to secure mining rights for this rare earth mineral.

[@marczhu7473]

Yemen the country usa saudi coalition fight since decades. Your plan is quite dumb in actual condition.

[@johnb6913]

antimony is usually mined as a gold mining by-product

[@chilbiyito]

I'm telling Saudi Arabia

[@GoliathsChamp]

This whole time, all you needed to do was find investors, and offer us shovels. Everyone so darn intertwined, it takes for ever to decide who reaps profit.

[@peterazlac1739]

This is the usual Alice in Wonderland spiel. Rare eartrhs are needed to produce the wind power and EV to save the World from overheating due to higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere but the Greens do not do the calculation of how much CO2 is emitted in the mining, refining and transport of the rare earths never mind that in the production of the metals needed for the wind and EV units and the chargers for the latter and that from the machines needed to preapre the wind turbine sites and concrete required for the raos and bases plus of course the power lines needed to connect them to the grid. Add to this the pollution when the EVs go on fire during charging or in hot weather, 19,000 vehicles in 2021 alone in China. Even the silca used in chips needs to be mined and smelted with hard coal and of course the chemical snad solvents used rin their manufacture require oil or gas. Perhaps you could do a program on this that expans on Michael Moore's Planet of the Humans that concludes that wind and solar is neither renewable nor environmentally friendly.

[@MsLS8]

The more I learn about “clean energy” the more I am inclined to think that it’s not CLEAN AT ALL

[@elonever.2.071]

Geo thermal is the only clean energy now and even that takes ore to tap into the earth's lower mantle.

[@LucarioBoricua]

Pollution comes in many forms, but even when considering the mining impacts of renewable energy systems, fossil fuel energy is still overall far more polluting between greenhouse gases, particulate matter, acid rain impacts, fire/explosion hazards, and derived petrochemicals (ex. microplastics and endocrine-disrupting plastics and their additives).

[@johnsmith-cw3wo]

@@LucarioBoricua forgot all the destruction because of Oil Wars....

[@ganaspin]

I think kind of funny that people argues climate change should be taken more seriously and that actions have to be taken urgently. But the moment that implies in the US and the EU losing market dominance and becoming dependent on developing nations, then the rethoric completely changes and national interest become the first priority, even when it means delaying and postponing climate goals.

[@siriusblackxxrucoy6094]

this problem is more of europe, but i think under the cities of europe there are a lot of rare minerals

[@adiadi5832]

Earth only problem is the number of inhabitants....if we go green or yellow not gonna change anything

[@MachineThatCreates]

Australia has truck loads of all these minerals from nickel and lithium to the weird ones. The ironic thing is that we'll bring in foreign miners to source it. Probably Chinese.

[@smashsmash5866]

What everyone is saying here is "if I know then what I know now than I wouldn't be so poor".

[@anat9857]

People rather dumping their old computers, smartphone ect. Why don't Business man re-use the old to make new.🤔

[@paniaparata6334]

It all makes sense now.

[@sumfatt640]

and always in such docs they forget the most important factor which is the demographic factor , the more reproduction the more needs for these elemtns which are already rare, and the more fights

[@nathanielanderson4898]

Cell phones should be made so that they can be updating by reprogramming or adding chips. We are forced into throwing away perfectly good products because of the market scheme of companies, who make products that become obsolete and unusable over a short period of time. In the 1970s, I could buy a television that would last for 50 years. My cell phone should be able to do the same.

[@spaghettigod43]

That's not possible. It's literally not possible because of, well just about everything. Your cellphone is much more complex than your 50 year old TV.

[@jamesmurphy9426]

The War machine needs them period the military Industrial complex doesn't care about the climate much less environmental issues

[@Reggaebeatman]

Is Green Technology really clean? It power is inefficient and toxic to manufacture. Sounds like the energy and rescource input put to build the infrasraucture way the out put benefits?

[@FrankHRitz]

The race should include circular economy