Rayman 1 (Atari Jaguar vs Playstation) Side by Side Comparison

[@AtanoKSi]

6:56 moskito travels from psx to jaguar

[@yousefslimani99]

I Found it Funny lol

[@Dudupool3795]

lol

[@rockyroad90]

Clearly showed what the Jaguar could do with capable programmers.

[@bangerbangerbro]

Shouldn't push either system. The Jag has no problems for 2D games like this other than the usual cartridge space issue.

[@Gaming-Enthusiast]

Love playing Rayman on the Jaguar Aldo Zool 2 show how good the Jaguar was at 2d games

[@crazedlunatic43]

Atari did a terrible job at providing developers the proper tool sets to program their hardware that was essentially plagued with bugs.

[@Tolbat]

@@bangerbangerbro very true, the game was only limited by the 4MB cart size and when you consider its on that 4MB cart its amazing.

[@Schule04]

@@Tolbat Many PS1 games aren't much bigger than 4MB when you remove the uncompressed music and videos.

[@newguy371]

Fun fact: the Saturn version uses the Jaguar intro when starting up but with different music, and uses the PS1 video after you create a new file. EDIT: Sorry, I meant it uses the part where Rayman is assembling himself. The text part is not used.

[@michaelbarrett1732]

Showed how capable the Jaguar was against the newer machines when it came to 2D - PS still had some advantages. Slightly smoother/higher frame rate and had levels that clearly showed more parallax layers/effects (Flying level, the level right after with the music instruments, etc) Still impressive 🙂 I love seeing consoles pushed.

[@Dj.D25]

Jaguar seems to have slightly better colors. And the part where you ride the first boss plays more like a shooter than the psx version did, where Rayman did the attacking with his fist. did. No rain effect on the stage where you plant platforms to climb up. PSX version though, has superior music and sound effects.

[@jackson5116]

CD sound, baby! That was one of Sony's selling points for Playstation back in 1995 when it launched in the West.

[@thegamingchef3304]

I still have my Jaguar we got from Babbages. In Retrospect the Jaguar was simply ahead of its time, obviously. Developers had a hard time figuring it out, so majority of the games released don't tap into half the power of the console. It was simply ahead of its time. By the end of its life cycle they started to figure it out (Check out Aliens vs Predator & Doom & Rayman). The industry just wasn't ready for the technology. Had Nintendo 64 dropped in 1993 it more than likely would have suffered the same fate.

[@spirituallyconscious7774]

Jaguar wasn't even real 64 bit graphics, so what the fuck you talking about??? I had a Jaguar and that was a big mistake on my part.

[@thegamingchef3304]

@@spirituallyconscious7774 It was...It had 2 32 bit processors. It was just the developers didn't know how to program for it and tap into its full potential. Most developers are on a time frame. By the end of it's life cycle you started seeing better games. I mean you are on a video that proves this, so why are you arguing this fact 😂. Atari Jaguar barely had games that looked better than 3DSnes games...It was because like I said, developers were clueless.

[@spirituallyconscious7774]

@Robert Anthony none of the games was that good…. Raymne and temptest was decent tho

[@crazedlunatic43]

@@thegamingchef3304 Atari did a terrible job providing developers the proper tool sets to program their said hardware that was already buggy from the start.

[@Mr.Atari2600]

@@thegamingchef3304 having 2 32-bit processors doesn't really make it 64-bit. The Sega Saturn also has 2 32-bit processors yet that system was claimed to be 32-bit. It really just needs a legit 64-bit processor that would actually be called 64-bit. in this case, the N64 is the 1st true 64-bit system.

[@TheSocialGamer]

I love the Jaguar's use of up close up layers of parallax scrolling the PS1 is missing it, also if you look closely the Jaguar had much more detail in the environments like the mount of random butterflies flying around and I also like the sharper more pixel crisp presentation over the PS1 softer anti-aliasing. Keep the FMV portions I'll take better game play presentation.

[@jackson5116]

64-bit bus, baby!

[@abhitron]

At 5:14 and 7:41 you can see the PS1 achieving transparent mist effects and additional background parallax scrolling respectively which are nice touches. I agree though that the Jaguar has a sharper image, and the colours look a bit warmer on Atari's console.

[@sebastiankulche]

Gameplay wise is also much more fair i think.

[@sebastiankulche]

@Obviousthrowawayaccount Thats an improvement for me. Although we shouldnt count it as something that was missing since Jaguar came out first.

[@wolfrikthewild8550]

@Obviousthrowawayaccount Slippery platforms on Jaguar or PS1? 😬 Just bought the Jaguar version

[@steve9094]

If most developers hadn't relied on the 68000 CPU, the Jaguar could have been a 2D powerhouse. I saw screenshots of this when it was new, and it was jaw-dropping to me. It was a true quantum leap in 2D graphics that obviously wasn't even remotely possible on 16 bit systems. The rest of Jaguar's 2D games, not so much.

[@wizzgamer]

@channelofstuff Neo Geo would like a word with you.

[@wizzgamer]

@channelofstuff Then doesn't the Dreamcast count as a console then that was Naomi in a console.

[@jackson5116]

@@wizzgamer Sega fanboys are so idiotic...

[@gjfkhvjzjsxbq]

@@wizzgamer bro what??? The neo geo was nowhere near as powerful as the Saturn the neo was 24bit the Saturn was 32 bit plus 3d capabilities

[@enhancementtank5876]

Saturn is the best 2d game. Play the dungeons and dragons or realms of mystaria

[@rapidloaf]

Is the PlayStation version missing music? In some stages like when he's riding on the fly, there isn't any music. I have the Sega Saturn version of the game, and it's hard to say from memory, but I don't remember any stages being silent like that. I also like the stage complete jingle in the Saturn version better.

[@phantonimparcialsilva2447]

Esse jogo era exclusivo do Jaguar, mas em 1995 foram lançadas as versões de PS1 e Saturn. E como essas duas últimas versões eram em CD, as músicas ficaram maravilhosas, novas vozes foram adicionadas, acrescentaram uma abertura ao estilo desenho e as fases foram melhor elaboradas. Quanto à versão do Saturn eu me lembro que os gráficos durante o jogo ficaram um pouco melhores e que ela possuía algumas animações exclusivas quando se terminava a fase.

[@segablastprocessing400]

@adilson comunista Jaguar más nítido que ps1 te lo creo. Pero no creo que Jaguar mejore la salida de vídeo de alta resolución de la Saturn.

[@enigmaster84]

The PS1 intro is taken from the American version. The voice is the European version is different.

[@andyukmonkey]

Ah, thats why it's different on my copy. Interesting.

[@bangerbangerbro]

enigmaster84 No it's not, I have the European PS1 version.

[@thebandanadee8265]

enigmaster84 ohhh, thats why.

[@nijamkaj]

Only if u have german vesion... or france..

[@arthurcastro9741]

Eu tive esse jogo original no Saturn, com aquela caixa enorme de acrílico, ficava babando com os gráficos desse jogo. Inclusive a versão do Saturn tem alguns diferenciais interessantes em relação ao ps1, como a música do fim da fase ("yeahh") levemente diferente (com um "scratch de DJ"), e os efeitos de tela quando passa de fase, alguns em 3D. Ótima sugestão para comparação, Rayman Saturn vs Ps1 :)

[@arthurcastro9741]

Ah, a música quanto termina o chefe é diferente tb, entre algumas outras áreas tb :)

[@stufaman]

Jaguar's intended mascot shows what could have been on the system. I'm glad it got ported to Saturn and PS1, but I just wished Jag could have kept this standard up. I hated the 32 bit intro though.

[@justdev8965]

What's there to hate about the intro? The intro is fantastic, at production values never seen at that time, and that today can be found only in projects with a budget of $30+ million.

[@TheMegaGamingWizard]

Yes the PS1 intro is better. Its actually full motion and kinda funny. Jaguar intro is good, but nothing special. It's the comparison that kills it really. Thank god this game didn't go obscure it very well could have....maybe. And then we'd live in a world without Rayman games, that sounds awful.

[@MarvelousMatt]

Was this on the jag or jag CD? if it was cartridge based it's a gorgeous game for the time

[@masterlee1988]

Jaguar, no Jaguar CD.

[@TS-yz3ud]

Why would it sound like that on the Jaguar CD?🤨

[@bubsy3861]

@@TS-yz3ud Jag just have a good hardware sound. Its also can play video in really good quality if you have a programmable cart to put it in.

[@J-Post86]

I had this game on cartridge on the jaguar at the time. The nostalgia of the music is real!

[@bangerbangerbro]

@@bubsy3861 Jag has no hardware sound. It is all software.

[@andreasnagel9377]

i love the game idid not know that the game is different in little things on the jaguar. i played the saturn version back in the day. it had some advantages over the playstation version. i would like to have the jaguar cart since it was the 1st version and it was designt for the jaguar. but its very hard to find these days.

[@slightlyloyal1442]

Man that Ubisoft intro took me back to end 90’s.

[@leonardlyletrillana9789]

6:57 it looks like it gone from the PS1 to the Atari jaguar

[@primeobjective5469]

I never played this game, but the colors are gorgeous.

[@PlumbDrumb]

It was probably the most beautiful 2-d platformer of the time. This was some of the best we saw before most everything went 3d.

[@Dante_Sparda_DMC]

Bought it for the first time on the PS3 about 6 months ago and beat it over a dozen times on three different versions

[@evilcrashbandicootthetouho2753]

@@PlumbDrumb it's the best 2D game in the history

[@cakeisamadeupdrug6134]

It looks like the PS1 is a higher resolution, but it ruins it by going way overboard on the anti-aliasing, which makes the Jaguar version look sharper. The colours on the Jaguar look nicer imo too.

[@backloggedgamer9338]

Yeah but let’s be honest who in there right mind would want an Atari Jaguar..

[@cnk9822]

@@backloggedgamer9338 the 300K people who bought it...

[@backloggedgamer9338]

CNK 98 yeah, 300k morons.

[@cnk9822]

@@backloggedgamer9338 yup

[@RayCarrot]

All versions of R1 are practically the same resolution. But they have different color palettes and such. The Jaguar version also had a limit of 2mb memory and 4mb cartridge space.

[@MrJeffreyBones]

Rayman was originally a Jaguar exclusive title made FOR Jaguar and ported to everything else a year later after the Jaguar sales were not good enough. If you see some enhancements in the PS1version it's not surprising they had roughly 2 years to add content and make it look better. Please remember people if the Atari Jaguar didn't exist there would have NEVER been any other versions of this game because it was designed for the Jaguar's hardware in mind. This is also why Rayman has no limbs. It was easier for them to do the animations because all of Raymans parts are on a single sprite strip and are separate objects drawn by the Jaguars RISC. Don't hate on the Jaguar it is the whole reason Ubisoft now has this franchise. NEVER FORGET THAT

[@dreamcastdazia4753]

Jeffrey Johnson Nice :D

[@gargonovich]

Rayman actually started as an SNES game and was later ported up to the Jaguar. If the Jaguar didn't exist, it probably would have come out on the SNES, or been converted up to something like the 3DO instead.

[@SlimShady.1990]

Jeffery Johnson what do you have to say about that?

[@Scrofrogoly]

The game would not have come out for the SNES, but definitely would still come out for PS1 and Saturn. Though I feel the content would be much more different than it is now.

[@stufaman]

Finally, some one else got it.

[@tatsushiro5532]

The Jaguar Version is a magic trick. A 650mb game in a 4mb cartridge, and with better graphics :)

[@zodiacthundaga7264]

There's way less parallax on Jaguar that, and the dithering is a bit more noticable. Missing effects like the rain in 11:30

[@juanelpito]

With Cheap sound and lame midi music

[@thomasdesposito]

@@zodiacthundaga7264 well that's definitely true for the less parallax scrolling on the jaguar, but that's purely from the cartridge vs the CD medium on the PS1. And yes definitely better music and sound effects on PS1 as well. But I can guarantee if this was playing on the jaguar CD it was close that gap without a doubt.

[@sebastiankulche]

​@@zodiacthundaga7264There is technically nothing missing in the Jaguar since is the OG version.

[@rage7805]

The reason its better on Jaguar is becuase RAYMAN was created for the Jaguar. The playstation version is a port of the Jaguar lol. The Jaguar Rayman is the authentic and original version

[@enhancementtank5876]

Ps1 dollar tree, n64 Walmart, jaguar and Saturn best buy

[@oogaboogie]

Yeah but it's objectively of worse quality. Original doesn't always mean better lmao

[@blackout270]

Jaguar 64 is just a way better system.😆

[@opaljk4835]

Ray man was kind of rebuilt every time it was ported.

[@olrod2008]

Jaguar was good at 2D but was way behind the PS1 and 3DO and N64 for 3D so much so it died very quickly after launch.

[@10p6]

The Jaguar version has more vibrant colors than the PS1, and a sharper picture. On some levels you can see more content in the Jaguar levels with more paralex scrolling and so on, and on many others it is the PS1 who has more content. This proves that any difference is not due to Jaguar processing power, but a lack of storage space on the Jags cart compared to the PS1's CD ROM.

[@vcdecide]

+10p6 I Agree ^^

[@mleolv426]

I can see way more parallax on the ps1 version plus a lot more foreground and background art and some fx like fog and rain

[@DangerWrap]

+10p6 I Agree too. The Jaguar version looks more cartoonic than PS1.

[@pleasuretokill]

+10p6 are we looking at the same comparison? Colors are totally washed out on the Jag, there is totally more content in the PS version, audio is terrible on the Jag and parallax scrolling is much better on the PS1.... also transparent clouds on ps1, none on Jag. The PS1 version blows away the Jag in every single aspect.

[@10p6]

+pleasuretokill Everyone has an a opinion, it is just yours is wrong :-) This is also based on emulation not of real hardware.

[@UnblockedGamesPodcom]

I had both versions back in the day and jaguar was better. had things added and better color. Sound was better on ps1 though.

[@thegamingchef3304]

Sony knows how to put out quality sound.

[@RobertK1993]

Atari Jaguar who even bought that.

[@mep6302]

@@RobertK1993 Some people did -_-

[@RobertK1993]

Mau Pr Was it popular.

[@TS-yz3ud]

@@RobertK1993 Chill out, man. Popular or not, it was cool.

[@wizzgamer]

Both games look gorgeous the Jaguar clearly has a powerful 2-D engine and the PS1 is no slouch in this department either Saturn is obviously best at 2-D with N64 being the worst at 2-D hence the Street Fighter games weren't ported to it.

[@MrManCube]

Yeah the 2d games on n64 seemed blurrier than snes games. Why?

[@diceshard5961]

MrManCube I think its because the n64 was made for 3d games in mind instead of 2d ones... But what do I know...

[@bangerbangerbro]

MrManCube I think I the N64 has forced texture interpolation (fading colour between each pixel) that makes textures always look blurry in N64 games, and if you're drawing sprites with the GPU then you're going to have that blurring on them too.

[@CarloNassar]

I don't think the N64 was supposed to have any 2D games.

[@Lightblue2222]

@@CarloNassar mk trilogy and nba hangtime rocked on the n64. Both 2D though hangtime was a sprite scaler. Maybe a lower resolution but out performed ps1.

[@msd5808]

They should release a Rayman collection with all the games on it

[@BOX_corporation.]

I wonder how many megabytes it should have..

[@boefjedewolf76]

Playstation is better no question about that i had both versions back in the day.

[@animanordeste]

Eu amo a abertura do Atari jaguar que começa com cada parte parte do rayman se juntando,mais eu acho que seria melhor se eles tentassem na do Atari simular a apresentação da de ps1,mais uma coisa que eu gosto muito é que a do Atari jaguar tem trilha em 16 bits,em quanto a de ps1 é mais música de cd

[@obvfw]

I'd say they both have their highs and lows. The intro dialogue and Betilla's advice are more fleshed out and grammatically correct on the Jaguar version, but the PS1 has a memorable FMV cutscene. As far as audio is concerned, PS1 is considered superior with CD-quality music and sound effects. Visuals, however, that's a mixed bag. Jaguar has some exclusive animations, like at the end of the Moskito ride, but PS1 has lots of foreground graphical effects like rain, snow, fog, and lightning. Bottom line is, it's all a matter of personal taste. :)

[@justdev8965]

For me getting the PS1 version on the classics section of PS3's online store was a no brainer because that way I get to play it on my Vita's beautiful OLED screen. It's like playing it on a portable CRT. The Vita has ridiculously good contrast and color. Another strong reason why having a PS3 is better than having a PS4. Many classic games available on PSN for PS3 do not even exist on the PSN for PS4. Rayman 2 Revolutions, Tokobot Plus, Digital Devil Saga, all 3 PS2 Fatal Frame games, Blood Omen, Soul Reaver and the list goes on and on and on. Given that a lot more people are using a PS4 vs. PS3, it is baffling to me why Sony doesn't include these games on the PS4's online store. Add the fact that PS4 doesn't support LAN play, and it's safe to feel that owning a PS3 (or 2) is FAR BETTER than having a PS4, and that's because of Sony's decisions, not the hardware!

[@sebastiankulche]

Something no one did mention is that the Atari Jaguar version, because it runs on a cartridge instead of a CD, that means it lacks loading times... and trust me, in a ridiculous unfair game you REALLY need no loading to make the experience more tolerable.

[@HostiaRecords]

Siempre he preferido un juego sin tiempos de carga, aunque la versión de PS1 se oye mucho mejor, no soporto las pantallas de carga, me quedo con la de jaguar

[@sebastiankulche]

Sobretodo en un juego dificil. Las pantallas de carga solo te quitan las ganas de jugar.

[@lonstonhimself2497]

They both look good to me, but the jaguar version does have better use of color

[@tm0054]

I had both the Jag and PS1 versions back in the day... IMO the PS1 version was a cut above, most likely due to it being on a CD vs the cartridge on the Jag. It had more environmental effects and obviously better sound and music since they are being played off of a CD. I still have my Jag cartridge but unfortunately my Jag died most likely due to the Mountain Dew I spilled on the power button in like 1994.

[@xXKaizoHarinezumiXx]

sell your jag cart

[@danielcarney3182]

The Jaguar version also had clunkier controls and the helicopter ability on Mr Stone's Peak was also much less refined. They are both great, though!

[@kaox44]

PS1 is smoother....and it even has the fog effect that Jaguar didn't have. PS1 wins.

[@syncmaster732nplus]

Don't speak to soon... Atari jaguar have brighter colors than the PlayStation, and some hidden advantages. And because this is a cartridge game of course it's gonna loose to the PlayStation unless this game was run by CDs (Atari CD-ROM extension)

[@billybobbob3003]

ps1=washed out looking jags still better

[@TS-yz3ud]

@@syncmaster732nplus I think the PS1 port has better colors. I could care less about "brighter colors". The more contrast, the better. Also, it plays better.

[@TS-yz3ud]

@@billybobbob3003 Jaguar is even more washed out.

[@TheBodybuilderChris]

it didn’t play on cd rom even with the extension so it loses. Stop trying to give it false hope. The ps1 is by far the superior version regardless if it’s not the original version

[@danielquintela1]

Engraçado que essa versão de jaguar o cartucho tem 24 mega (3MB) kkkk a versão de psx contem vídeos e o som melhor em uma midia de cd, a parte do mosquito tipo navinha no jaguar ficou melhor, o psx tem alguns efeitos graficos suoperiores e detalhes nos cenarios.

[@Tolbat]

Jaguar wins because it was a year earlier. The other games are ports with add ons.

[@geminielectro]

Did you forgot the PS1 soundtrack??? There's no music in some parts.

[@SaulGRCanalYT]

I personally like the PS1 version more because of the FMV and memorable OST (to me)

[@SaulGRCanalYT]

SPAM COMMENT BOTS ARE NOT ALLOWED

[@RichardCyberPunk]

Dont forget that PS1 hardware is newer than the Jaguar..... Very important in console/computer comparissons.....

[@NukeOTron]

I heard somewhere that the Jaguar version was more or less designed for its Motorola 68000 chip. Also, it's easy to tell that the Jag version's audio is lacking. That makes me wonder, is it possible to port this game to the Sega Genesis? I know it means color loss and other details lost, but the GBA version had its colors downgraded, so it's not too much of a stretch.

[@alessandrorizzi2871]

The Jaguar version sounds like a Java game

[@franckyreala680]

It's true 🤣🤣🤣

[@dvirarazi7351]

You should really make a comparison of all the versions of Rayman M/Arena!

[@thatswedishguy638]

I prefer the PAL version on PS1, much better voiceacting ^_^

[@Min3r_R]

the atari jag has the first electroons right away, wow but Playstation wins!!!

[@iulianispas8634]

I never have a jaguar but looks better then ps1

[@ragexg]

Overall I like the Jaguar Version better. But the Sound is way better on PSX

[@alainazor3990]

PS1 intro have better music sounds and cutscene + rayman talking very normally that's very awesome i love that ATARI JAGUAR intro very good they have caption can writing everything they're said that's very good is easy to reading the story beginning of the game i think both very good Jaguar take 1 PS1 Still very good

[@captainbeastazoid7084]

The graphics are basically the same but the sound is def better on the PS1.

[@videogameobsession]

I don't get it.. Is this comparison using a badly ripped PS1 copy or something? The Redbook audio is clearly missing. Only the sound effects can be heard on the right (PS1) side. The Jag version is good, but the PS1 version is better in almost every way, as it should be, utilizing a CDROm and twice the video RAM. The music is one of the most charming aspects of Rayman and the Jaguar just doesn't come close to measuring up.. I even Did the math too! ;)

[@lettydragon4299]

2:00 it says "untidy too"? i always thoought he said "troublesome isnt it, and im tiny too" xD

[@jasonhull2163]

Graphically Jaguar. Sound and fun factor PS1.

[@RAFAKSBR]

Versão jaguar superior: fase do mosquito melhor, tem um mini game acessivel via codigos e sem loading algum! Além disso o controle do jaguar é mais agradavel de se segurar. Rayman tmb n necessita de acessorios extras (memory card) no jaguar.

[@sinister8739]

Sempre ouvi que a versão Jaguar era melhor, mas o vídeo mostra o contrário. PSX leva grande vantagem, especialmente nos cenários com chuva, neblina, efeitos parallax.

[@Welcome-oj4qs]

I was 5 years playing it on a jaguar

[@waltercamachoberrocal2506]

La versión de atari jaguar es la versión original, mientras que el de ps1 parece en vez de port un exclusivo :v

[@Jerry4050]

all that the jaguar is missing is the FMVs and the YEAH at the end of the level

[@Shuda87]

The Jaguar impresses a lot here but I'd say the ps1 version wins, if only for the music and sound effects. Everything sounds so cheap on the jag, though it's cool to see where some of the music tracks origin from. Personally I'd pick the Saturn version though ;)

[@theobserver4214]

Isn't the Saturn the best version of Rayman 1?

[@infernal_monkey]

Jaguar wins if only because it lacks that awful "YEAH" stock voice clip every time you beat a stage.

[@ArchaiaMeta]

you're gay

[@TeeroyHammermill]

I had both of these versions (purchasing the PSX version much later and cheaper). Jaguar version had sharper graphics and smoother animation. PSX version graphics were fuzzy and animation was not as smooth. Both good versions but I'd give this game to the Jag.

[@dreamcastdazia4753]

dstarks80 No

[@boefjedewolf76]

You crazy Must have crappy eyes

[@IgnacioCalvo87]

La intro del Rayman de la Jaguar es mítica

[@TomBom292]

I think that the biggest difference is that the Jaguar version sounds like total horseshit compared to the Ps1 version.

[@dreamcastdazia4753]

TomBom292 xD

[@bangerbangerbro]

TomBom292 What do you mean? I prefer the Jag version's sound.

[@HakuZaku]

That and PS has more detailed background and colors

[@arekrekas213]

i prefer jaguar's music, but everything else about the PS1 version is better than the jaguar version

[@vichobocho_archivo]

Pc version is the best

[@NoeLPZC]

I grew up with the DOS version... therefore the DOS version is the best.

[@TS-yz3ud]

There's a DOS port? I'll have to check it out to see if it's actually the best.

[@منوعاتالعشاق-س5ذ]

بالرغم انا اتاري جاغور كان اقدم ولكن الوانه في هده اللعبة كانت اجمل وبالنسبة لشكل وطريقة اللعب لايوجد اختلاف

[@yousefslimani99]

باستثناء الموسيقى و الاصوات

[@AuriosCPU]

Overall the Rayman 1 on Jaguar seems more funny because cool music in Background while none on PS1 and nice effects. Of course nice colors too but those on PS1 are cool too. But less scenario of course.. So i wish to play it, definitely going to the Jaguar version for the fun :)

[@phonedork]

I have all 3 versions. Saturn is the best! I just hate the "Yea" at the end of every level

[@josephfrye7342]

i know the "yeah" part is annoying i dont know why.

[@andyukmonkey]

I quite like that to be honest.

[@josephfrye7342]

Oh ok

[@theobserver4214]

Saturn has more graphical features (In Mr.Dark's battle, beating him shatters the glass into 3D shards, and has a little cutscene with sprites after that)

[@thekenixkil]

i hate the 'yeah' too

[@mOczakowski]

Atari's Jaguar 64-bit system, the only 64-bit system to play at 16-bit level, and most times even worse.

[@brugges]

Well, the Intellivision, the Lynx and the Neo Geo are 16 bits and the Pc Engine is 8 bits... everything is relative ;-)

[@nitrosophelin]

the reason for this is because alongside it's other processors, the Atari Jaguar included the Motorola 68000 which was the same cpu as the Sega Genesis. Because of this, a lot of developers got lazy and only used the 68000 chip instead of using the Atari Jaguar's more powerful hardware.

[@bubsy3861]

Well, good luck to play doom on genesis. "Same cpu" is in it?)

[@attilathehun0]

Lasers fries and disc drives die=Jaguar wins on longevity.

[@Iusti06]

I thought we were comparing the game not the consoles.

[@attilathehun0]

@@Iusti06 Obviously back in the day the Playstation and Saturn were better with intro and cut scenes because it had to be the disc for that. The funny part is the Jag finally got a decent game and then they went bankrupt. lol!

[@firedupplayers]

One is played on a cartrige and the other is played on compact disc 😆

[@faereman]

When it comes to graphics, it's kinda hard to tell, but the Ps1 version does have more details and the colors are more distinct while the Jaguar version looks like it has some kind of green filter over it. Still looks good on both sides, but Ps1 has a slight advantage. For the music and sound effects, the Ps1 is just miles better, the quality and the variety of instruments is just on another level. Then there's the actual tie-breakers (even though it's not a tie :p), and that would be the gameplay and level design. Because having played both, I can say that the Jaguar version was basically a beta version, the controls aren't as responsive (the ledge-grabbing immediately comes to mind) and the level design is filled with little issues here and there, especially towards the end of the game : some awkward enemies placements, some unsynchronized platforms, a questionable puzzle level in the picture world (that got removed in the Ps1 version) among other things... TL;DR : Graphics-wise, it can go either way, but I think Ps1 is a bit more colorful and detailed. Everything besides graphics is just straight up better on the Ps1 version.

[@BurnBird1]

I know that this comment is a year old, but thank you! Everyone keeps saying how the Jaugar has better colors and making claims like it having hundreds of thousands more colors, or stuf like that. I've just never been able to see it and I personally think it looks like the Jaguar version has a filter over the graphics, like you said.

[@poepeter8394]

I have had both and i remember the ps one version looking better and playing better as well as the sound is better offcourse. And one thing i remember is the music level where you can slide on the ps one you just walk on the jaguar version.

[@ENFDO]

More scroll parallax in jaguar.

[@Arkeagood]

In reality the jaguar is better for the only reason is because its older hardware and its running on a cartridge ,the clearity of the ps1 is realy just a resolution difference

[@retroboy-fh1ji]

atari jaguar wins in this time but i love the ps1 graphics

[@moozartney]

I love the ps1 version. It has much better sounds and music by far. I do like the Jaguar opening story slides, but overall feels a bit outdated. Both great versions though.

[@andyukmonkey]

I'm sure my version of Rayman on the Playstation has different audio on the intro FMV.

[@theobserver4214]

The way the English magician sounded depended on if you had an American copy or PAL copy and chose english in PAL.

[@andyukmonkey]

Blank Blank It's interesting that they bothered to redo it at all.

[@reeosva]

How can y'all do this?

[@Wyatt_James]

Last time I checked there was a cage at the beginning of deep forest in PS1, like there is in the Jaguar version.

[@vermin_x]

I know, 5 years ago...^^ Must have lain here on the cut. When he opens the second cage, it is on the psX side, also already the second cage.

[@Wyatt_James]

@@vermin_x I think it's closer to six years by now. I oughta play through Rayman again...

[@javiergonzalezcalvo2233]

Graphics better PlayStation but colours selected better on Jaguar

[@bromanndibs3709]

man dont know how only atari jag had the good music

[@amunve]

in the level after betilla background have better color in jaguar unfortunally not support fog

[@Lucky_9705]

The Jaguar version has better colors and smoother sprite animations, while the PS1 version has the better soundtrack.

[@seapne]

The Game is Atari Jaguar original

[@PaulineThePelecanus]

@Lol papel AFK This is the PS version not PSX get it right.

[@منوعاتالعشاق-س5ذ]

atari jaguar

[@dexthegamer3234]

i have the jaguar version...

[@wizzgamer]

Both look stunning but the Jaguar edges it due to more colours but that's to be expected as the Jaguar is a 64-bit system.

[@magnumforcemopar402]

wizzgamer not true 64bit jr.

[@orderofmagnitude-TPATP]

wizzgamer ~ is that a philips cdi controller for your avatar? I really hope you dont think that was a good machine?!

[@camulodunon]

@@orderofmagnitude-TPATP his pfp is not a CDI controller. It's a Gravis PC gamepad. The CDI gamepad was a cheap knockoff.

[@orderofmagnitude-TPATP]

@@camulodunon oh ok...consider me schooled.

[@locked01]

Atari with the Jaguar and SEGA with the Saturn made both the same mistake: not investing enough in 3D capable hardware. Nintendo, on the other hand, did the opposite with a machine almost incapable of 2D graphics, and also chose the wrong media. Stuff like.the 3DO or even the Pippin... I'm not considering that as both Panasonic and Apple weren't serious enough about videogames industry. Sony, with a mixed bag, but overall balanced hardware, that had a lot to thank Nintendo for its development, spent millions with developers and truly believed in what they were selling. This is the only truth.

[@cheapmovies25]

Jag CD could of had the fmv and more content

[@brandonselitetv1436]

mike smith but this was On a Jaguar Cartridge not Jaguar CD

[@Miesiu]

What is the capacity of Jaguar Cartridge ?

[@Miesiu]

But in game the GFX is the same.

[@ressljs]

The largest Jag carts were 32 MB. I'm not sure about Rayman though.

[@CarozQH]

Thing is, almost no developer wanted to develop for an unreliable CD add on that no one bought.

[@aryinc]

Big thing is, you could buy a psx for tons of great games. Jaguar has rayman as one of it's best 2 games the rest on it is absolute shit.

[@Markis5150]

+arjan snijder The PSX is absolute shit. Saturn destroys it as does N64. Go educate yourself before making a mockery of your ass here.

[@aryinc]

+Markis5150 what's your problem?. what did i say wrong. psx destroys saturn and n64 together,and i'm a saturn fan. but i touhht we where talking about the atari jaguar here,the jaguar just pales in games compared to the others and such. why buy a jag for rayman when you can get it on every system ;).

[@Venra]

+Markis5150 You are not objective at all You know? I love Saturn, but overall taking all game genres PS1 wins it easy. PS1 also beats n64 with one hand in game library. Because this what's matters. But in my opinion Saturn got a lot more diverse and better game library than n64.

[@jamiehake975]

+Venra wrong answer N64 has Mario 64 (game changer), Zelda both titles better than anything ps x , smash bros, don't forget golden eye the blueprint of all fps

[@Boomrainbownuke9608]

no it is not shit the ps1 has more things behind it then the n64 the reason why there even was a playstation is because of nintendo breaking a promise with sony the ps1 is able to load 180,000 polygons in a single stage compared to the n64's limitations the ps1 beats it by that stand point including with the sound quality a game being cartridge based vs disc based the disc wins by it being able to hold alot of space which says that the n64 is limited due by the tech nintendo was using at that time they would have been able to used a disc based formate but they decided not to and even the fact that nintendo was keeping a thing called micro coding away from the devolpers if you dont know what micro coding is it is custom coding made for a specific game they only released it to the game devolpers when the n64's life span was comming to a close the micro codding allows the creator of said game to do more with the systems tech but because of the limitations at the time nintendo drove away some people and those people went to sony to make there games

[@andrewwatson4607]

Atari Jaguar but I do love the ps1

[@anonymousgamecritic9832]

I’d say the Jaguars version looks a bit more crisp on the colour and Rayman or just his animation whilst he’s walking looks faster, but PSX wins only due to music and video which tells the story better. But the original slightly different Jaguar version is still great none the less! 😄

[@RAFAKSBR]

Fase do mosquito parece bem mais legal no jaguar....

[@A31Chris]

It was just confirmed by one of the Jaguar Zoop developers that the Jaguar versions potential was restrained in favor of the PlayStation version. And that's just Zoop. Hell, no one remembers Zoop. So the Rayman Jaguar rumors are almost undoubtedly true where Sonys deep pockets held back the Jaguar version for nearly a year until the PlayStation version was ready.

[@bangerbangerbro]

I thought the Jag version shouldn't even exist if it was only ready that late.

[@A31Chris]

@@bangerbangerbro it was ready a year before the others

[@bangerbangerbro]

@@A31Chris Yeah. It would have to have been started way before it was released to be on Jag. If it was only ready by 95 then it would have to have started when the Jag had already flopped I think.

[@boiii3productions945]

Jaguar version is superior but the PS1 has some advantages due to CD technology (which means it has FMV and CD audio)

[@gratefulkyle1]

This is dumb. No context at all. Is the Jaguar on AV? Rf? Rgb?

[@foxeygamer87sonic]

I play the PS1 version on my PlayStation 2 because I assumed that the original Rayman goes on Play Station 2 but it turns out it works on PS2 so I assumed very carefully otherwise I would be playing on a boring old computer PlayStation

[@UTUBMRBUZZ]

Jaguar wins because of the spinning 3d cube in the logo.....

[@elmariachi5133]

I still wonder how this game could become so popular .. For me it should have been releases about 4 years earlier, when I played such games on the Amiga. And honestly I think this game couldn't even hold up against the Amiga's Turrican II, despite running on a much more capable later hardware. But when I had the PS1, games where all about 3D. I even tried back then Rayman, but couldn't stay motivated for more than about 40 seconds.

[@tessaPMpro]

Sounds like you just have a poor attention span, it's also not fair to judge a game that, by your own admission, didn't even play for longer than a few minutes, that's just ignorant and closed-minded.

[@elmariachi5133]

@@tessaPMpro It was actually way more than a few minutes. I gave the game more than once chance. It's a few minutes over and over, I tried it very often. But the right feeling was just not there, it felt outdated and stale as a platformer in 1995.

[@tessaPMpro]

@@elmariachi5133 how is it outdated or stale? It's better than most 2D platformers, especially at the time.

[@sebastiankulche]

@@tessaPMpro Is ok to be wrong.

[@tessaPMpro]

@sebastianaliandkulche except I habe yet to hear anyone explain how I'm supposedly "wrong". If I'm so obviously wrong then both of you should have no trouble explaining how I'm wrong, yet instead I get silence.

[@nathanialpearson2681]

Jaguar version was the better of the two. Brighter, crisper graphics and NO load time. I loved the shooter section with the code revealed! Would like to see all the other versions compared

[@intention21]

Sounds fx, music goes to the ps1. The other console did a little better on background butterflies 🦋 as well as little blue orbs that would burst 💥 more vibrant. Ps1 wins