RC Sproul Causes Albert Mohler to Facepalm

RC Sproul's comment causes Albert Mohler to facepalm and has the crowd of pastors in tears. Also MacArthur's reaction is priceless.
Source: Shepherd's Conference 2004

[@reformedtubers1028]

I love the way RC slapped John MacArthur after his comment😂😂😂

[@chernowitz]

Great come back from dr. Mohler. But the ability RC Sproul had to insert funny stuff like that was amazing.

[@firstnamelastname2552]

RC had a great sense of humor. It's easy for teachers to stay in serious mode the entire time because they're teaching very serious things. But RC knew when to say something humorous and lighten things up for a moment.

[@minisight2000]

I love r.c shows u can have humor but also take the gospel seriously!! Love that man!!!

[@leslieharris2536]

Priceless! Love these men!

[@lengraves2556]

We can tune in to view these men but one is now missing. R. C. has left this world to be with the Lord he loved and pleased, through his years of teaching the truth from the Bible. Not since the years of the early teachers have we in "His" church been so supported. We loved this man not only because he gave us the Bible but because he also gave of himself. He told us how tough his own journey had become at times. I have often Thanked him for this side of reality. Although we are "In the way" life can always be tough to walk through. R. C. Sproul has made it planer, Which is all we need. Thank you Ligonier Ministries for continuing to leave this on air.

[@marfialennox2642]

I’m in my room cracking up as if I’m sitting next to these wonderful man. I thank God for the teachers He gave us.

[@rirhandzumathebula8856]

Gosh, RC 😂💞we will remember you.

[@gitmlife10]

The men seated there might disagree with R.C. but respect him as their teacher. RC makes a strong case for his stand, but he doesn’t undermine what the other teachers preach. RC takes the pain to explain why the tradition was followed and where we go wrong-in thinking that tradition displaces the need of true faith to be justified.

[@kardefernandez]

Lo amooooo!

[@kirklefevrejr.603]

Man I miss RC Sproul

[@indakgalak]

I love all these three faithful men of GOD!😍❤️✝️ Also loved all of their respective reactions...😅😆😂

[@rodneyrhodes8393]

If you keep your eye on Mohler at the beginning of RC’s response, he’s just nodding his head eager for what he believes will be an elaborate confirmation of what he is saying, only to get got. Haha

[@SoCalDario]

🤣 I love it

[@willsberg]

R.C believes in Infant Baptism. He was making a point that baptizing infants is Ok.

[@fallenslave6684]

It is not ok to baptize infants

[@babygunz0604]

sarcasm

[@willsberg]

But the understanding of it is far different from how it is understood now.

[@willsberg]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aIfdhoKfg9man9E

[@iowagrams2897]

fallenSlave It most definitely is OK

[@offroad5798]

This is great 😂

[@GerardAndRoseVlogs]

0:38 👋

[@adamconner6616]

Too good. Ha!

[@susanmathai2266]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@HamidHamid-fi7ck]

تحية لروح الدكتور ار سي سبرول الذي تعلمنا منه الكثير

[@ibrahimjira6274]

What aTripartite analysis that is fascinating

[@christophersamuel2157]

Where can we see the whole thing?

[@ryrocks9487]

Rare RC Sproul W

[@mjohnson1813]

I listened several times and still can't tell what he said- anybody know?

[@skynes]

"Apollos did the best of his knowledge until priscilla and aquila told him to baptise babies."

[@ChristopherShaw]

RC stumbled on the words a bit, but he basically said "Priscilla and Aquila told [Apollos] to baptize babies." (as in, that was the error that they corrected Apollos on--he wasn't baptizing infants)

[@Chirhopher]

Christopher Shaw , lol. Shout out to my Presby Brothers and Sisters! (R.B.) All Glory to YHWH in YESHUA

[@willsberg]

R.C believes in Infant Baptism. He was making a point that baptizing infants is Ok

[@jackwityomind4226]

Turn up your volume

[@davidfernandez1992]

Is there link to the full video?

[@CaptainPantys]

I don't get it at all but the audience sure did!!!

[@atenglangit1]

I dont get the jokes😅😅

[@rirhandzumathebula8856]

Baptising babies🤔RC against all.

[@atenglangit1]

@@rirhandzumathebula8856 o.

[@fallenslave6684]

If I understood corectly, and if I did not please tell me, R.C Sproul told that it is ok to make a bath to a baby and call it baptism? If yes, I do not find it funny. This is not relevant to Scripture.

[@RushyoRifle]

It was a joke, as far as I know R. C. Sproul is simply of the position that "infant baptism" is not inherently wrong nor does it constitute salvation as that comes only by a sovereign work of God.

[@TheJpep2424]

It is inherently wrong because it goes against scripture. In scripture, baptism occurs after salvation. Infants are not saved.

[@willnicholsv7644]

J Pep I did a little digging on why the Presbyterians believe this, one of the sources being a defense of the practice by R.C. himself. There is an excellent "debate" between he and MacArthur here on KZbin. They both lay out good cases, though I believe MacArthur had the upper hand defending believers baptism. We should not dilute the seriousness of this issue, but they both have good cases and this is a nonessential doctrine--one that should not make the church grind to a halt.

[@RushyoRifle]

It is only serious if people claim baptizing infants is related to salvation. At my church we simply call it a infant/baby dedication, we see it as acknowledging the gift from God and the parents affirm to raise a Godly child and as a congregation we affirm to support the parent and child while they are with us. Ending with a prayer of blessing over the parents and child. It is a God honoring tradition nothing more, nothing less

[@willnicholsv7644]

I do not think the PCA does, other than it being a sign. The Presbyterians use a heavy reliance on a comparison with circumcision to defend their position. Again, I'm not agreeing with them necessarily, but the defenses I have read are rather good. If you rely on scripture alone, believer's-baptism-only is much easier to defend and immersion appears to be the preferred mode. They must rely on some assumptions and viewing the practice through the lenses of church history and tradition, which do have weight in reason, I believe, but are outweighed by the scriptures hundredfold. To my understanding (I'm not a Presbyterian), they compare the fact that, while all of Israel took the sign (circumcision), not all of them were faithful to God. In the same way, Presbyterians argue, all of those in the church, meaning second and later generation believers, should take the sign of the new covenant (baptism), although only through the grace of God and by having faith in the Lord Jesus Christ will they be saved. Continual research on this takes one into differences on beliefs about Israel's place in relation to the church and the people of God as well. Very good cases have been made on the topic of infant baptism--at least those involving the PCA Presbyterians on one side and the Credo-Baptist folks on the other.

[@jackwityomind4226]

Didn't like how RC assaulted John Macarthur. You could see Johnny Mac wincing in pain (disguised as a smile). So not only does he baptize the unregenerate, but he assaults the regenerate!!

[@indakgalak]

Jack Wityomind I believe all babies are saved by grace...❤️ Also they are VERY GOOD friends... Please lighten up... It was a friendly tap, NOT an assault GEEZ!

[@ablethreefourbravo]

@@indakgalak #JohnMacarthurlivesmatter

[@jdvitualla.renewed]

I bet u too were laughing by these comments down here.. English is not my native language but I can sense the sarcasm LOL! 😂

[@laserfalcon]

Sproul taught heretical calvinism nonsense

[@laserfalcon]

@@keydelux2 look up, heretical calvinist nonsense,. www.discerningtheworld.com/2014/02/27/calvinism-greatest-delusion/ Good place to start,.

[@laserfalcon]

@@aNeReplays No where in scripture are you told to repent of sins for salvation. I would advise you to go back to seeing what scripture says. I stand by my first comment, Sproul was a heretic by his false teaching.

[@laserfalcon]

@@aNeReplays can you show me a verse where we are told to repent of sins?

[@laserfalcon]

@@aNeReplays So you repent of sins for the remission of sins?

[@laserfalcon]

@@aNeReplays I want you to look at that verse and point out exactly where it says repent of sins, see if you can do without added to it. Take an exegesis approach instead of the opposite eisegesis approach. I would also read that verse in context of the entire chapter.