Reading 233 Page Young Thug Judge Recusal

We will go over EVERYTHING that was said in the secret meeting the Judge didn't want made public!
Want to give StreamYard a try? Use this referral link and get a $10 credit! I will also get a little kickback from StreamYard if you decide you like the product and keep using it!
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: streamyard.com/pal/d/67361079...

[@amesters00]

Oh Siri 😂

[@labman3420]

Intercourse means... 😂

[@user-vq7bj8lt8f]

As to the length of the trial, it took ten months to select a jury that, in her opening statement, Love claimed would take a few weeks. Georgia’s rules of discovery recommended that the judge require that discovery be completed by ten days before the trial. The recommendation was widely interpreted as allowing the judge to require completion more than ten days before the trial. Terabytes of prosecutorial evidence was provided to the defense in September 2023, months after jury selection began, presumably after the prosecution had sufficient evidence for a trial.

[@krab1791]

I think you can blame the length of the trial on the prosecution. They chose to make this a RICO trial and therefore brought in all the defendants and their attorneys. It’s only a RICO trial because they did not have enough to bring the individual people to trial without invoking RICO. The ties that make it RICO are slim. RICO wasnt meant to be used in this way and the prosecution is abusing it to get some convictions. Convictions on crimes they cant get in the normal process because statute of limitations has passed and only RICO is allowing them to prosecute.

[@user-vq7bj8lt8f]

I believe that the reference to other ex parte meetings between the Judge and prosecutors at least partly refers to material both absent and present in the transcript of the documented ex parte meeting. Absent from the transcript is a preliminary statement by the Judge stating the purpose of the hearing. This indicates that the judge and the prosecutors had a formally undocumented meeting that agreed upon the purpose of the hearing. Other comments recorded in the transcript suggest that the judge and prosecutors had discussed matters beyond the purpose of the hearing.

[@user-vq7bj8lt8f]

Thanks!

[@Jewels-B]

Thank you for reading this to us. 😁

[@PutinsFriendAlec]

A ream of paper is 500 sheets, this isn't even half a ream, much less a plural number of reams.

[@buckeyejenna3191]

Where is the ex parte motion filed by Love regarding Copeland’s testimony? It was attached as an exhibit to the documents in the record transmitted to the appellate court. It was briefly visible in the document Infamous Sylvia was scrolling through yesterday.

[@krab1791]

Possibly in Part 2? RA has not finished reading the motion and there is a part 2

[@holz_name]

I listen now to the first 30 minutes, and the defense here is unhinged. We have the transcript and the meeting with the judge wasn't even ex-parte. The judge discussed the rights and obligations with a witness and his lawyer. The witness was subpoenaed by the state and given immunity, the witness have no choice but to testify. But, on bad advice, the witness chose to plead the Fifth, which put him into contempt of court. All parties involved were present at the judge's chambers, the state, the witness and his lawyer. The discussion in the chamber had nothing to do with the trial's defense team. The TLDR of the transcript is as follows. State: witness we gave you immunity. Judge: you must testify or you be held in contempt. Witness: I plead the Fifth. His lawyer: hmm. Judge: witness, you will be locked up in jail until the trial ends. Witness: I done more time than that.

[@holz_name]

I hope this will be denied. The lawyer is really an inept snowflake. I saw him whining to the judge because he wasn't prepared for trial, accusing of intimidation because he saw some random tall man standing somewhere, and the latest the in chamber discussion that he eavesdrop and the judge put him in contempt.