Fujifilm X-M5 is the new Micro Four Thirds camera that I was hoping for - RED35 Review

[@tank422376]

Agree! I hope OM system could come up with a modern PEN with this formula, targeting on EDC and street, holiday, family photography

[@Red35Photography]

Glad you got the point :)

[@lacsarlacsar3566]

congrats Fuji, finally catch up to the Pens and OMDs after what 10 years?

[@thegreatvanziniphotos5976]

Take my money now if they do.

[@ValhallaGuild]

This is what OM should compete. Next generations don’t like EVF . it’s a transition to a smartphone. FUJI is really setting the competition higher

[@Red35Photography]

@@ValhallaGuild Olympus did have the PEN EPL line that only have back screen but no EVF. EPL 9 & 10 and EP 7

[@robinschaeffer6252]

It looks like a nice camera. The XM-5 is not really a competitor to the OM-5 but is filling the niche left open by the lack of a new Pen camera for the U.S. market. The larger sensor (APSC, 26MP) is a plus, and if they will make some pancake lenses to go with it will make it an easily pocketable camera for every day carry. For the person who is taking pictures with their cell phone it would be a nice up grade and the lack of an EVF may not matter to them (I've noticed that many people who grew up with smart phones use the LCD screen to frame shots even when the camera has an EVF) As a "first camera" it should bring more people into the Fuji system. Bravo!

[@naneri]

There is 27mm 2.8 pancake

[@ImageMaven]

Ooh nice. Are camera brands finally listening to us! I hope they keep those smaller cameras coming - in all the brands.

[@Raist3db]

Camera brands have been listening to us on this all along. It’s only MFT that doesn’t seem to be listening. I mean, maybe not this smaller size but sure much more compact modern cameras around.

[@Raist3db]

And it’s all the much more frustrating when MFT has everything going to precisely make smaller models. In fact, model lines that have been done. Can you imagine a 25MP “GM9” maybe just barely bigger, with this new sensors and PDAF?

[@55whiplash]

Wow, great review, Jimmy! I have to say I kind of want it because of the size and I wish we had a M4/3 camera come out with decent specs. A Pen F II, or G9 II or even 850/800 update with ibis would be perfect.

[@edzardpiltz6348]

No weathersealing, no ibis, no viewfinder for travel? No thanks! 😐

[@boonhantan8221]

No ibis & no evf is a deal breaker for me too.

[@adzrulafnikadri]

True that! 😂

[@mrlau630]

for what viewfinder?!😅do you have a screen

[@DISK2000]

You saved me 20 minutes, thanks!

[@luzr6613]

@@mrlau630 incomprehensible comment

[@patrickmcfadden1689]

Red, Love your channel and reviews. Just returned from 2 weeks in UK, took tons of pics in London with EM10miii and G7X. I like the specs and features of this X-M5, but since I am retired and not a pro photographer, will stick with my current stable of Lumix, Olympus, Sony and Nikon cameras. I don't have any Fuji mount lenses but I have tons of M43 and E-Mount lenses and adapters so in place of the X-M5, will use my A5100, A6000, EM10, GX85 etc. Decided on taking the EM10miii on this last trip because wanted it to blend in and not be a target for theft, worked out well. Keep making interesting content.

[@estraume]

You really need ibis. I would like to see a new version of the Olympus PEN E-P7 with the sensor, stabilization and other specs of the OM-1, maybe even include a rangefinder style EVF and make it a new PEN-F MK.II. I have both the OM-1 and the PEN-F, which both have the fully articulated screen. For some street photography use, I think the simple flip out/flip under screen of the E-P7 is a better solution.

[@chazlyle41]

How does IBIS help with moving subjects in low light?

[@nindoninshu]

@@chazlyle41 it allows you to use a slower shutter speed to achieve more light intake with less shakiness and handheld blurring, however this doesn't really help with moving subjects, not sure where you see that but he never said anything about low-light nor moving subjects

[@alex-reay]

⁠​⁠@@nindoninshuabsolutely. And if one wants to convey motion with blur then IBIS is a real bonus. If one wants to freeze motion just increase S/S and or ISO, just get the shot. Too many ‘photographers’ are just tech nerds harping on about noise and ISO… just get the shot.

[@chazlyle41]

@@nindoninshu IBIS is great for a still camera on a still subject. Doesn't really matter if you are a moving photographer photographing moving subjects. Not a need at all.

[@nindoninshu]

@@chazlyle41 that's what I was thinking maybe there are some cameras with super smart IBIS that can help with pan shooting for example, so i guess there are a few cases

[@andreuitnijkerk]

Did you have any issues with random restarting. Even while shooting video? Also during photo shooting while zooming. And when changing settings the lens resets. I contacted my retailer and they advised me to return it. But there is no stock anymore so i will not have a new xm5 anytime soon.

[@Red35Photography]

Not during my time with it.

[@VechaiKoban]

update the lens' firmware would solve your problem

[@bingbong4848]

As a user of both systems, I must say that Fuji lens options are pretty sweet, especially the primes.

[@bsuthe]

I don't do video or vlogging, so a camera's still-photo performance is what interests me. The X-M5 has no EVF capability, not even a clip-on EVF as do so many Olympus cameras. Strike one. It has no IBIS. Strike two. And you call it a "micro four thirds" camera, yet it has an APS-C sensor. Strike 3. The film simulation feature is something I doubt I'd ever use. I'll stick with Olympus, thanks!

[@robinschaeffer6252]

For my Olympus EP-3 I bought a "hood" that can be slipped on (and off) the LCD screen that has an eye cup and magnifier. It was less than $10 (USD) compared to hundreds the add on EVFs cost. For shooting pictures in sunny situations it works quite well.

[@DavidMonroe-d6n]

He didn’t say that the xm5 was a micro43. He clearly said that he wished LUMIX and OMDS would make a camera like this. I’m looking at this, or the rumored 1 inch sensor camera as a replacement for my LX100, since LUMIX has abandoned that design.

[@Raist3db]

The closest OM Systems competitor is the EP7. The EP7 has no EVF. It does have IBIS, but IBIS for many situations it's unnecessary and the image quality of the XM5 is higher than the EP7. Plus the XM5 has AI AF, and PDAF, which the EP7 lacks. I put good faster AF and response higher in the hierarchy of needs of a photographic tool than IBIS.

[@jordiw3692]

I’d be all for it if it had IBIS. I had an xe3, and my hit rate was quite a bit lower than I’m used to on other systems. If ricoh can put ibis in the GR III, then size+apsc must not be the limitation. Olympus cameras, and many other brands since, have trained me to use IBIS as part of the creative process. Id love this thing w the 35 2.0 and would have ordered already but for that one lacking feature.

[@samki_foto]

I am sooooo waiting to get my silver X-M5! I was one of the first to preorder it. So that's good.

[@Vinnyfromlv]

Did you get it yet? Im still waiting

[@simonatterbury]

This was so tempting up to the lack of IBIS on video. Think I'll keep saving up for the OM1 MKII.

[@ethannguyen7562]

Other brands seem to have abandoned this entry-level market segment. The X-M5 and the rumored DJI mirrorless are wake-up calls for them, targeting the mass appeal of young people (though not me). For those complaining about the lack of an EVF, IBIS, etc., just pay more for the X-S20. While I’m not a fan of Fuji’s direction with the X100F series or their high-profit margin strategy, this camera definitely nails it for its intended audience.

[@petermcginty3636]

Thanks Jimmy. Nice camera for my wife. Small simple, fashionable. My wife HATES the EVF on my cameras and she will LOVE how this has only a screen. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@ValhallaGuild]

Fuji made the right decision on no EVF and specifically the video and vlogging features most people right now don’t or are not used to EVF specially the GeN Z and millennials. I hope xm5 features will have it on next OM5 like open gate.

[@natearts09]

Its definitely changed my mind bout Fuji. It also places more competition for m43 in terms of compact/functionality goes. I'll be sure to pick this one up. Thanks for the share, continue

[@robertLuxama]

Excellent reviews! I love the perspective you took! You know what i think it's really missing now? Maybe a really good plasticky video-focus zoom (to reduce the price) but with excellent video quality and excellent Stabilization. something like: an Aps-C Zoom Lens "14-60mm f/1.7 Stabilized" (or f/2.0), with 5 or 7 Stops Lens Stabilization, create by Fuji for about $500 to $1000 USD, or by anyone manufacture, but for Aps-C cameras only. Something similar to the idea of the Samsung NX 16-50mm F2.0-2.8 S ED OIS Zoom Lens, and the Lumix 10-25mm f/1.7 m43 lens. (Maybe this lens can be done by Samsung, who knows! jaja) That's would great to see!! And it would make this little camera a king of best entry level camera of all time, for sure! Something less important: Why the Lens Manufactures don't think about Lenses build with Variable ND filter inside the lens, if it is all about glasses or lens area ND filters? That would be great to see one day!

[@prestonowens4594]

Looking to get more into video. I’m coming in as a stills hobbyist. Any recommendations for an M43 shooter? Something that doesn’t crop in at 4K would be nice. My em5iii is okay at video, but the 4K crop kinda sucks when I thought I had everything composed. I’m not going to buy a new camera right away, but I’ve heard lumix is the better option for video over OM/Olympus. Any recommendations?

[@Red35Photography]

Olympus/OM 4K doesn't crop unless you employ MIS-1 setting (sensor IS + Digital IS). if you switch to MIS2, you will get the full width back with sensor IS only. Like all camera on the market, any DIS needs to crop to give extra stabilisation. I use both Lumix and OM, they both are the same when it comes to crop. Lumix, being a video centric camera maker means that they have more options to play with when it comes to settings, but OM is good enough for most hobbyists to be honest. Extra things mean more distractions. Also, Lumix only gets better if you spend a lot more money on G9 II or GH7, otherwise, you should stick with OM/Olympus.

[@prestonowens4594]

@ thanks for the advice Jimmy. You helped alleviate my Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS) from taking control. I’ll try to check my settings next time I shoot a video. Thanks again, and good health to you and your family.

[@iandrury1542]

Olympus and Panasonic should sit up and take note of what Fuji have done with this camera and then release their own improved answer to it.

[@chuckthompson4439]

No, the Fujifilm X-M5 is not a Micro Four Thirds camera; it uses an APS-C sensor, which is a different sensor size than Micro Four Thirds; the X-M5 is part of Fujifilm's X-series, which is known for its APS-C sensors.

[@damnhandychannel]

You're missing the point: M43 has lost its way and most of the new M43 cameras are bigger than most full-frame bodies. Gone are the days of the PEN-F or GM1. The X-M5 fills this gap by offering an APS-C sensor in a body as small as most compact M43 bodies. I'm looking at picking up an X-M5 to compliment my X-T5. I loved my GM1, but it was too small and the image quality was just okay. The X-M5 looks far more compelling.

[@Mraz75]

Your points has convinced me to get this camera.. 😊

[@nikoforu]

Hey, Jimmy has the same denim blue EPL9/10 as I do. Beautiful camera. Anyway, personally, I find the XM5 a bit pricey for a camera without an EVF (7500 Danish kroner where I live). You can get the brand new Nikon z50II at that price (weather-sealed and it has an EVF) Fuji has many lenses, but nothing small with a wide focal length (wider than a 35mm equivalent) which would better fit this small-ish camera (the only one is maybe the old XF 18mm f2?). The XF kit zoom in this video is decent, but larger than I expected when I got one myself (with a XA-3. an older but similar rangefinder style camera body). While the XM5 looks like quite a good still camera, it is obviously heavily geared towards video and here, I think the lack of IBIS hurts it and relying on OIS of some lenses or just digital cropping is a poor solution. Personally, as a more still-oriented guy, I would trade IBIS for an EVF, even a cheapo, low-res one. It makes all the difference when composing shots in bright daylight. Maybe Xm5 works fine for Jimmy in gloomy, cloudy UK, but I can't see myself using an XM5 on trips in, like say, sunny Southern Europe if I can barely see what I am shooting at. I need an EVF. I speak from experience because I use a GM5 and the EVF is terrible but it's still better than having none. So if Fuji would retain the same specs as the XM5 but put it in a theoretical XE body (Fuji's rangefinder line with EVFs), I'd be a lot more interested.

[@RJ-Isaac-TSOML]

As a video guy, the open gate feature (not mentioned here) is really cool. This really helps with the challenges of trying to get good portrait frameing from content shot for landscape. The place I really see this camera shining is in video podcast setups. Since the camera is mounted on a tripod, the lack of IBIS isn't much of an issue. The Sony ZVe10 is still cheaper, but I think the better recording from the xm5 makes it worthwhile.

[@vampirolepis]

Which small gimbal do you recommend?

[@todanrg3]

It can have amazing video specs but can it focus smoothly and consistently in video or every footage will look jerky and full of focus hunting?

[@Red35Photography]

Focus is fine. As mentioned in the video, the DIS looks horrible and too much sudden shakes and looks jerky. But on a gimbal, this is a beast. AF hunt is more to do with the lens. This kit lens isn't the best when it comes to AF speed, but it's ok for stills, because it's small and light, and pretty sharp for what it is.

[@AllieOnPointe]

Personally, I love this camera and I’m excited for mine! I am a professional but this is great for when I don’t want to carry my main gear. I already have and love my x70 which has no viewfinder and no ibis and it still takes amazing photos so I don’t mind not having those since it kept the price down on this. I also don’t do video but i love the articulating screen for protecting the screen when its not in use and for taking self portraits or family photos on a tripod. :)

[@alex-reay]

I can’t understand why you didn’t compare it with the E-P7 (and all the other Pens) which surely shares the same target audience. But the E-P7 has the advantage of IBIS, Colour Creator, flippy screen, pop up flash and of course, super lightweight MFT lenses. Add Fuji lenses to the XM5 and the weight soon starts to add up. It may have more MP and technically higher video specs but the E-P7 is more than good enough, it’s superb. Olympus already made the camera you’re looking for and I know you know that 😉

[@dodgeball28]

This is the exact camera for me. I’ve owned 3 fuji cameras with EVF and rarely ever utilized it bc I’m too tall and most situations I have to take photos at my chest/stomach level and I hate to always bend my back to use EVF. And the size is perfect for everyday carry.

[@liciniooliveira-becas3618]

As an X-T5 user, I do miss the IBIS and more importantly the better battery. The X-M5 size is amazing! But may not buy it simply because I don't wan't to use two battery "systems".

[@vermis8344]

Gonna be honest, it looks very tempting. If only I didn't have two or three travel cameras already. (including one with no IBIS or viewfinder! 😱 Holy moley you might as well scratch your images onto a slate with a woolly mammoth bone! 🤪) Although I wonder if there's a kit version, and what lens does it have?

[@ZeitouniJad]

I think the X processor 5 with the Xtrans 4 is a very powerful already proven combo well done fuji on this choice for this price range

[@MarkMark]

Those trucks going the wrong way on that roundabout was a bit scary. 😂

[@johnherzel718]

I have a Fuji X100-F (2 versions old) and I love it for its size and the lens. But I hate it because I can't change the lens. I keep it because of the form factor (small and easy to take along) but I find that I never use it for video because it lacks IBIS. I think if Fuji can make the XM-5 with IBIS I will get one and sell the X100-F. This looks really nice.

[@MaxPhotoGraphic]

Thank you buddy, and anyway beautiful soundtrack

[@GavinSeim]

I don't get it. No evf, no ibis. Just bought a Em5 III for less money and it does far more. I'll stick with the XT3, even it does more than this and it's 5 years old.

[@lacsarlacsar3566]

IKR

[@Tempus__Fugitive]

It's almost as if different cameras are designed for different use cases.

[@GavinSeim]

@@Tempus__Fugitive Ya there are. Yet they are calling this a vlogging camera yet it does not compete head-to-head with the good vlogging cameras.

[@Tempus__Fugitive]

@@GavinSeim it does undercut them in price though and the XT3 is bloody awesome to be fair!

[@Raist3db]

This XM5 does better AF than the EM5 III, is smaller than the EM5 iii, has better image still photo quality than the EM5 iii and *vastly better* video quality than the EM5 iii. So no, the EM5 iii doesn't do "far more"- it depends wha you use it for. IF you need weather sealing , the EM5iii has a win there but remember to pair with a proper weather sealed lens.

[@ahimsastudio6763]

It's a very interesting camera, but it's crazy the way that in today I would probably still choose G85 at close to half the price and still able to fulfill my video need. For me the perfect scenario will be if in the near future G100 II comes out with ibis and priced at max at the same as this XM5

[@gordon3988]

Nice camera…perfect for everyone no, but for social media folks close I expect. Offers a lot. Personally I wish for IBIS and weather sealed, albeit the latter not critical. BTW I’ve noted a number of KZbin folks who now simply refer to a “M4/3” sensor now as a “4/3” sensor. Will LUMIX and OM follow..I have lost hope, well not for OM yet as the OM 5 darn close!

[@petermcginty3636]

Hey Jimmy. FYI for some reason, there is a whole pile of videos hitting YT about the OM-5. Weird but nice.

[@Myphotoxplore]

A camera that is almost perfect for me. Unfortunately, it is not equipped with IBIS, making its dimensional compactness less than perfect because most prime lenses are generally not equipped with in-lens stabilization

[@Raist3db]

The question you need to double check here is- do you really need/use IBIS? If you are shooting in daylight, and you are doing shutter speeds like 1/100 or faster, you don't need IBIS. In lower light you might depending what you are doing- but again, if you are shooting even 1/50 for a 50mm Equiv focal lens, you don't need IBIS.

[@alex-chicago-80]

I think you can get the Nikon Z5 which is a full frame under 1,000 US these days. I get the form factor is apple and oranges.

[@KraxzyHunn]

I dont think most people would understand this xm5 meant to compete sony zve-10 which also has no ibis and viewfinder aswell. I was looking to buy zve10 and lucky enough i got myself into pre order fuji xm5 which is way cheaper and i’m on tight budget. But the AF on sony is miles better but we’ll see

[@freudentrauma]

Yeah it's definitively meant to compete with Sony zve-10 ii and Nikon z30. Or at least in that market segment. But the title is comparing with M43 offerings, where user care about ibis and evf within that formfactor.

[@entrigueall2661]

The pictures seem a bit soft, is that because Lightroom? Good colors.

[@andersistbesser]

I would never buy a camera without ibis. Its 2024 not 2005

[@kaptnwelpe5322]

My GF2 and GX1 don't have one. Works. And nothing beats a tripod... . BTW: I think the X-M5 is too small to have one.

[@PandaEire]

@@kaptnwelpe5322 Ah yes, get a tiny camera without ibis to save on space/weight just to carry around a tripod everywhere.

[@dw-et3gm]

@@kaptnwelpe5322used camera without ibis is ok, brand new in 2024? No. But Leica is doing the same, if you take that as a 2024 camera.

[@StephenStrangways]

​@@kaptnwelpe5322the E-PM1 is smaller in every dimension and has IBIS, and was introduced 13 years ago. Fuji should have caught up to that by now.

[@reinhartsianturi6740]

Tremors problem?

[@cyclonemind7585]

Nice review thank you. I wish you would also talk about the lens they send with it cause 15-45mm lens is not so favored.

[@sbcwinn]

Wow! A new MFT camera! Just what the market is waiting for. I will have to add this camera for travel and street photography. Great job Fuji Film. Now I get to try out your new film simulation modes while keeping my dozens of MFT lenses and the rest of my system. Thank-you Jimmy for reviewing this very important new camera, to anyone who has an investment in micro four thirds.

[@Raist3db]

The XM5 is not a MFT camera. It's an X-mount Fujifilm camera. Jimmy just said he wishes MFT would have come out with a camera like this one.

[@pbasswil]

Many good qualities; but for me, a built-in viewfinder is worth a bit of extra size. And also for me, mechanical image stabilization is _such_ an advantage.

[@jamesmlodynia8757]

When i started digital photography, i used a Canon point & shoot that was small enough to fit in my pocket , it had a viewfinder, not a great one, but useful. When they started doing away with the viewfinder, i bought my first DSLR. Pentax K100D Super. The thing about Pentax cameras 📷 is even the basic 6mp cameras were well made with IBIS. that was 16 years ago. When I buy a camera today it has to have certain features, viewfinder, IBIS and ability to change the lens. I would rather spend the extra money to get the features i want and that is why i chose to buy the XT50 instead. As my Fujifilm every day camera.

[@thegreatvanziniphotos5976]

Great overview. However, I am glad I kept my Canon m6ii with external EVF.

[@Raist3db]

Canon M6II is pretty great. Where I see this Fuji has an edge is the latest face AI AF of Fuji deals with people with glasses where the M6ii does not. It's a pity Canon killed the EOS M because the latest generation of Canon AF is superb, but as it is, the M6ii is still pretty great indeed. I am getting this Fuji though for being smaller and having easier to get good color than the Canon. IT's also smaller than the Canon with or without EVF on the M6ii, I value size a lot, but you got a nice M6ii camera for sure.

[@bitsandblocks7826]

The camera is cute but seeing the size of those primes compared with MFT the lens size defeats the tiny body. Can't change laws of physics and APS-C requires bigger lenses. I have a GX880 for social shooting which is way more compact. I've used APS-C in the past and for some it is the ideal compromise but i find it not truly compact and without he benefits of FF. Enjoyed the video though 🙂

[@eleteazn]

This EIS with weird jerky background is not looking so great. Why can’t mirrorless cameras stabilize video like action cameras? GoPro and DJI Actions have been able to electronically stabilize way better for many years now. Perhaps it’s a patent thing? Great review and thanks for capturing this quirk!

[@AnilJedi]

Would you have this or Dlux 8 if you were cheating on Olympus?

[@Bigfarmer8]

Are you in the market for a new camera? Let me help you a bit. The X-M5 costs €899 body only in The Netherlands. The OM-5 costs €1199. Several people have already mentioned EVF. The lenses in front of that EVF are better than most brands use. The IBIS of the OM-5 is one of the best in the business. The weather sealing of the OM-5 has an IP-53 rating, unlike any other brand. That makes that price difference already justified, but the OM-5 has lots of other features like Starry Sky AF, Live ND, Live Time, Live Composite, Art filters, High-Res (50 or 80MP), focus stacking and the best grip on a small camera ever. Video on the OM-5 is not brilliant, but pretty good indeed and more than enough for a travel camera (and without wobbly artifacts!). Video on the OM-5 has vertical mode which is brilliant for viewing on phones.The OM-5 is rated at 330 shots on a battery charge, and sure enough, if you use processor intense features like High-Res that is about what you get, but on a six hour photo shoot on a wedding I did not change the battery once (1174 shots). Now, isn't that a good proposition? I can make it even better! Suppose the unfortunate happens and you break something on your camera. The OM System repair service is very fast and very good. Even better! If you buy a pro camera or lens OM System will lend you similar gear during repair time. If you buy a €8000 camera from Canon or Leica or so, they do not offer that service. Even better. Quite frequently OM System has very good offers. And I mean serious discounts. Recently for instance the OM-1 with 12-40mm f2.8 Pro for €1499. Just imagine. I pro camera with a pro lens, pro features and pro image quality for €1499! Right now there is a cash back offer on the OM-5 with €300 cash back. That is an OM-5 for X-M5 money! If you have a little patience you could have that camera or lens that you want for an excellent price! Now, if you would all be so kind to make a solid and wise decision and buy that OM-5 camera, OM System will earn more money so they can develop that Micro FourThirds camera that Jimmy was hoping for. Meanwhile you will have great fun with a fantastic camera. #OMSystem #MicroFourThirds

[@ryankwan1934]

The real issue is that Fuji's primes are still honking huge for what they are. Even older ones that aren't as heavily optically corrected, like the XF 16mm f/1.4, are massive compared to something like the Sony 15mm f/1.4 G.

[@sergeidubarev5079]

I'd rather prefer the X-M5 having a small flexible flash (just like the X-M1 has) than having the film sim dial... Otherwise, I like it. I don't care much about the viewfinder. In-body IBIS (which the X-M5 does not have) is a nice but not highly necessary add-on, and so are the video features (which are present), IMO.

[@MichaelGerrard]

It is a great camera. Now OM, make a new PEN with the guts of the OM-5, the new menus, USB-C, it would do nicely. But a good price too, the same as this Fuji.

[@nickdsnik]

Sorry, why are you calling it a "Micro Four Thirds" camera in the title? Not very helpful.

[@Red35Photography]

You have to read between the lines (words). I wish M43 can make something like this. We long for a replacement of PEN or GM camera but neither Lumix or OM would do it and now Fujifilm just made one.

[@vermis8344]

It's called a play on words. It's something humans do.

[@nickdsnik]

@@vermis8344 It is not a play on words it is closer to click bait.

[@cce-ob3]

@@nickdsnik how can it be a clickbait when everyone in the camera world knows that Fujifilm doesn't make M43?

[@nickdsnik]

@@cce-ob3 Because of the headlines a couple of weeks ago about Fujifilm adopting a new sensor size.

[@samson40a]

Downside of Fuji cameras unless you go for the high end models is no weather sealing. Also although the body is small there are no equivalent Fuji lens compared to Olympus. An example is the excellent Olympus 12-100 and yes I know that lens isn’t small but you can take just one lens for most eventuality. No Fuji equivalent. The Fuji 18-135 is nowhere close. I am a long time Fuji user but enjoy the OMD EM1 II with 12-100 for travel.

[@Raist3db]

That depends. The fujichrome primes are small.

[@samson40a]

@ they are but I was comparing the Olympus 12-100 of which there is no Fuji equivalent of similar quality

[@Raist3db]

@@samson40a Sure, but I only mention that because just picking particular lenses is something you can do for any system. And I would even go as far as saying that lenses in the 24-85mm equivalent focal range are more in common than a 12-100 F4 in MFT.

[@rpmcitycruiser]

I'm confused. Does this camera actually have an MFT mount? Or is he saying that he wishes Panasonic, OM System, or DGI would make an MFT mount camera with this camera's features?

[@ronyzmiri]

Most important is missing - IBIS!!!

[@Raist3db]

Is IBIS really "most important?" You gotta ask yourself if you really need IBIS. If you are shooting in daylight you most likely don't need it. If you are shooting at night but need to freeze subjects, you don't need it. Of course if you are using long telephotos in some situations you might, but long telephotos is probably not a good match anyway for a body this size.

[@rumijarl]

How come you are calling it a m4/3 camera? This is directly from Fuji's pagr for the xm5. Image Sensor 23.5mm x 15.6mm (APS-C) X-Trans CMOS 4 with primary color filter

[@dentboxhero1717]

I still prefer my old EM5 Mk-1 which I still faithfully use over that thing for vacation/travel

[@johnoswald5093]

Fundamental error in title? I'm pretty sure Fujifilm X-M5 uses APS-C sensor (23.5x15.6mm) not smaller Micro Four Thirds (17.3x13mm)

[@yohan2437]

As an owner of many Fuji cameras (currently X100V, XE4, XE3, X70, formerly Xpro2, XT20,XT1,XA-1) I think the Nikon Z30 is better than this XM5 when it comes to ergonomics and image quality. People greatly underestimate the 21 Mp sensor in the Nikon APS-C cameras which is able to render fine detail much better than the muddiness from Fuji Xtrans. It doesn't necessarily render more detail but the Nikon is better at delivering a naturalistic rendering of crisp details and texture missing from my Fujis. All Nikon APS-C lenses have stabilization except for the 24mm f1.7 prime so IBIS isn't really needed.

[@Raist3db]

I think the XM5 is better because the image quality is actually better than the Z30 and most importantly (for those of us that this is important), the size is smaller. X-trans renders detail fine if you are using DXO, Iridient Digital or Capture One. I will agree if you use an Adobe product workflow it may not be optimal there though.

[@CliveMoss]

The XM-5 is not a micro 4/3 camera. It is APS-C, unless the Fuji website got it wrong.😦

[@Red35Photography]

I was suggesting that the XM5 would be my ideal M43 camera.

[@alex-reay]

This is Fuji’s attempt to imitate the brilliant E-P7 released 3 years ago. But imagine if OM had released this camera without IBIS. Imagine the outrage 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@Red35Photography]

haha quite right. We are spoiled with IBIS these days. But to give Fuji credit, this cam has one of the best APS-C sensors available with more than enough 26mp resolution. But it also has hybrid AF and better CAF performance than any PEN cameras to date. Olympus should have given the EP7 hybrid AF when they released it. Other things that I think make the Fuji more 'modern' is the joystick at the back and USB-C. EP 7 and even the OM5 still use micro USB, which is what most users complaints. I think the OM-5 is still my preferred travel cam, but the Fuji is a good alternative given the fact that it has higher resolution, better noise performance at high ISO and those video features (for those who use it of course) will definitely prefer over any similarly priced OM/Lumix small cameras in 2024.

[@maestropalos5366]

It will look awesome if you buy a view finder for it.

[@IKL111]

I love ur car XD

[@DDTipsy]

Now a days Mobile cameras are as good as traditional cameras in terms of image quality. And they have an added advantage of size, 2 or 3 lenses, one can easily upload photos on internet etc..

[@TopGarageTV]

I’m confused. I thought this was an APS-C format. 😬

[@Red35Photography]

It is, hahah many got caught on my hidden message :)

[@henrykwan2082]

Micro 4/3?

[@robbylagen5054]

Everyone crying about EVF and the film simulation dial just haven't realized that this camera isn't made for them.

[@towmlvb3423]

I didn't find any trace of people crying, just people saying why a strangely flawed yet brilliant camera is not for them. My OM-D E-M 10 remains my main camera... ...until...

[@lacsarlacsar3566]

just like the Pen F and E-P7?

[@letni9506]

It's not for them but it could have been. So bit of a missed opportunity. I mean what does this really offer over an iPhone? Not my problem though and I've not shed one tear in frustration 😅

[@yohan2437]

@@lacsarlacsar3566 Pen F has an EVF + IBIS.

[@jd3330]

@@letni9506Good point. I would’ve taken this at $1000 with IBIS.

[@jurekjerry7274]

The Sony A7CR is small. It could be the new MFT canera.

[@jodybiztube]

A huge dedicated dial for a gimmick. Amazing. 😅

[@Raist3db]

Yup, and it will sell like hot cakes because of it... :-)

[@MaxPhotoGraphic]

Plus you gotta new subs mate, just feel free to... ;)))) have good one. Rock on!

[@luzr6613]

I'll wait for a digital Holga.

[@reeshmalms6686]

They could have given an option to add an external evf

[@jurekjerry7274]

Without an EVF, you can keep it.

[@edwinng8878]

Sigh, I thought it was really m43, need to replace my gx7, but realised later the m43 was just click bait.

[@woodiifoo]

Obviously, Fuji is reserving the much coveted features IBIS and EVF for its higher end X-E lineup. It’s business after all.

[@Raist3db]

It's also obviously different target demographic. After all the Panasonic G100 doesn't have IBIS, and the OM Systems EP7 doesn't have an EVF...

[@lawrencebrett8993]

Actually it isn’t a micro two thirds camera. It’s APSC which is a fair amount bigger.

[@lawrencebrett8993]

Oops micro four thirds!

[@MarjansTV]

Micro four third?? I thought it was APSC hmmmmm

[@aaronmiller2535]

Except the sensor size is A PSC not micro 4/3

[@samsantana]

No evf for travel? Only in the UK where it's akways cloudy. That canera would be a disappointment if you brought it on holiday to Australia.. or almost anywhere else in tbe world.

[@alanmonkartist]

My Sony ZV1 has a clean left side...just saying 😁

[@heiser_bill]

The X-m5 is APS-c, not Micro Four Thirds.

[@RB-pp5tv]

So it's now Fuji's turn to do a really small but crippled camera. The last time it was Panasonic with its S9, which does have IBIS. This one is making the S9 almost acceptable, as you can with the S9 use manual lenses which are cheaper and lighter than AF lenses. And, the S9 is full frame. This one seems like a sunny day outdoor camera, unless you use a big fast lens or AF lens on it, defeating the purpose of a very small camera. The 26MP are not helping if you have to sacrifice and reduce it for some digital IS. Using a higher ISO to prevent shake is also not helping the 26MP IQ. Calling it a M43 camera is an insult to those cameras. Any cheap M43 camera produced in the last 10 years will deliver you a picture, and not just blurred or soft images half the time.

[@m47d48xt]

I wish someone would make a camera like this but that didn't bother with video at all. Not everyone does vlogging.

[@Raist3db]

You can still get the X-M5 and ignore the v-logging aspect. It is fully capable photographically- has full mechanics shutter also.

[@leNotstrom]

I am not a young man anymore, still I ordered this cam right away. I hate using EVFs, I never get the results I wanted it to be, while with my iPhone 13 Pro I always got what I wanted to shoot. But it lacks on Image Quality. So yes, this XM5 is perfect for me.

[@kaptnwelpe5322]

What are Olympus Systems and Panasonic waiting for? They could do better in terms of small and maybe price. But do not offer current technologies like USB-C, usable as a Webcam, UHS-II in their famous small form factors (GF1/2, GX1, E-P, E-PL). No wonder MFT is on decline... . Fujis X-M5 is really tempting to buy - but: no hot-shoe EVF. And: different mount with some Lenses "missing" like a Panasonic G Vario X PZ 45-175 with internal focus. PS: no IBIS? MFT pendant would be a GM1 without flip/titl LCD. Who needs that anyway - just make a usable Smartphone connection (like USB-C over hot-shoe)...

[@HerbertPollard]

No evf, no ibis, no weather sealing and $800 US. Not for me.

[@Raist3db]

Yup, and the G100 doesn't have IBIS, and the EP7 doesn't have an EVF. Weather sealing if you want/need it starts at $1,000 USD with the OM-5 and that's on offer.

[@towmlvb3423]

This might be the Fujifilm camera that moves to its Mark 2 the fastest ever. It has enough flaws.

[@fajaragusSaputra]

Om system make new item hybrid camera named om vlog 😅

[@glennsak]

Look how much the lens sticks out. No thanks.

[@sabatiniontech7256]

Let us see. No EVF so useless in bright light. XTrans sensor so lower color definition than megapixels would imply. More expensive and heavier lenses than M43. M43 has more faster lenses. M43 has fabulous in body image stabilization and lots of lenses that have internal stabilization that couples with the IBIS. And I want this camera why? Try the Lumix GX8 or GX9.

[@King_Of_Spectres]

"waaaah no ibis" almost as if that means you'd have to get better at taking photos

[@Raist3db]

The real problem is how many people may think they need IBIS as a paper list check instead of asking themselves with the photography they do (they do some right? :-) ), if they really need it. If you re shooting at 1/focal length in FF equiv terms or after, you don't need IBIS. That's a lot of day shots right there.

[@rizzuanamin]

no noviewfinder is shit 😂

[@4b494d]

Pre ordered this as an upgrade to my old Fuji x-a1 ....... But cancelled it because I realized this isn't going to make me more money. I think I need to upgrade my Sony more than this travel cam. No thx.

[@bastian.michel]

Hey buddy, becareful, you are driving on the wrong side of the road!

[@lacsarlacsar3566]

maybe he thinks he's an Indonesian.

[@avid-ii4vk]

No ibis and fujifilm autofocus, no thanks