Let's all pray for The Redeemed Zoomer. I hope that one day he sees the error of his ways and that he finally comes to the crucial realization that he needs a new mic. Great chat btw.
@nav3sss4 ай бұрын
fr 🙏
@JustinCage564 ай бұрын
They had us in the first half
@Veckcom4 ай бұрын
underrated comment fr
@EugenioCarmo3 ай бұрын
Kkkkk
@nekozaki389721 күн бұрын
you had me for a moment
@WAHRHENDAHRSTEIN5 ай бұрын
It’s nice that Zoomer was respectful and actually listening and not trying to talk over Ryan to prove a point🙏🏻 it was a good chat
@xHollow.4 ай бұрын
They agree on a lot of things✝. Especially the true gospel. Plus RZ is a truly kind hearted individual🙏
@Jerome6164 ай бұрын
I was shocked he said Catholics are not saved…. He’s really changed since those early days.
@DanielLindsay-z3w4 ай бұрын
You will know the Antichrist by His lawlessness 2Thessalonians 2:6 His deceiving the elect Matthew 24:24 His head wound Revelation 13:3 Brilliance in business Daniel 7:8 His peers bowing before him Revelation 17:13 Exalt himself in words and deeds (Daniel 11:36)
@UncleToaster4 ай бұрын
@@DanielLindsay-z3w (random agnostic) “That must mean Donald Trump is the Antichrist.”
@mdreagazit67944 ай бұрын
@@Jerome616in one point they say they can’t judge but they judge the Catholic and those who believe in other ways
@c00lman474 ай бұрын
I love how This isn’t like a debate nobody is trying to win it’s just a conversation between two Christian’s💪
@deefizzle14 ай бұрын
Iron sharpening iron! ✝️ ⚔️✝️
@ToriGanza21204 ай бұрын
EXACTLY i loved this.
@N819996 күн бұрын
Debates can also be really great for the audience to learn to
@jonathanwu65085 ай бұрын
WAS NOT EXPECTING THIS COLLAB!! 🔥
@UnOrthodox_Christian4 ай бұрын
Right?! Fantastic!!!!
@danielritchie44004 ай бұрын
Seemed like more of an interrogation than a collab. A gentle, kind hearted one at that, but didn't seem much like a colab.
@andyontheinternet57775 ай бұрын
Seeing men younger than me articulating the faith so clearly is encouraging.
@andyontheinternet57774 ай бұрын
@@TheTruthsetsyoufree-j5s Of course. Good works are the fruit of genuine faith in the saving work of Christ.
@axxel96264 ай бұрын
@@caleschnell sorry? 2 Timothy 2:13. John 10:28. John 4:13-14. Salvation cannot be lost, NEVER. Study the Bible man.
@oklol76164 ай бұрын
@@axxel9626 Unbelievers actually can't have works, they are workers of the lawlessness. (Hebrews 11:6)(Matthew 7:21-23) Good works are not just things that appear good but rather done with the right intention.
@andyontheinternet57774 ай бұрын
@@axxel9626 You're instinct is to support the position of solo fide, which is the correct Biblical view. I think you are missing some of the nuance of how God saves us so that we can do things that glorify him. Look at Ephesians 2:8-10 for a clear Biblical explanation of this. The Epistle of James argues against a dead faith. Sometimes James is misused to support a works based salvation, but the misuse does not negate the proper use. If you have genuine faith in Jesus saving you, your life will show it.
@axxel96264 ай бұрын
@@oklol7616 james 2 is talking about giving food to the poor, and i saw too many unsaved people giving food to the poor, so yeah, they can do good too now. WE ARE MADE RIGHTEOUS ONLY BY THE BLOOD OF JESUS, NOT BY OUR ACTIONS. Our actions can be good, but they don't justify us, cause we are all workers of lawlessness.
@JesusSavedMySoul112844 ай бұрын
thanks for having this discussion guys! Born again 9 months ago from being a militant atheist and full believer in Darwanism (such a bleak and miserable life I led for so many years with that nihilistic mindset), baptized in water 4 months ago, I have a lot to learn and listening to these discussions among brothers helps me understand the bible, the gospel and more.
@JesusSavedMySoul112844 ай бұрын
and for context I was saved at 23 when I found a bible in my closet, went to matthew chapter 5 and read the whole sermon on the mount and found out I was a guilty sinner, my sins weighed on me for the first time like chains, then later read what Jesus Christ did to save me. Glory to God
@HerManyJoysss4 ай бұрын
Praise God!!
@SaberNeumayer3 ай бұрын
@@JesusSavedMySoul11284just saying believing in evolution is contrary to being Christian, redeemed zoomer actually believes in evolution
@wanitopablitoАй бұрын
Christ is King 👑
@LiteralyRealRyanGosling5 ай бұрын
you two have been super important to me. RZ got me into Christian content in the first place and Ryan has really helped me through many questions. So glad you guys Collab I would love if you guys do a part 2 at some time.
@elijahonyoutube5 ай бұрын
I wasn’t expecting this collab! Very interesting
@redturtle8205 ай бұрын
cliffe knetchle sometime?
@Yan-Shcherbyna4 ай бұрын
Yes
@smalltrashman42274 ай бұрын
That would be legendary!
@Conk_Creet4 ай бұрын
Cliffe has definitely shown belief in a works salvation from clips I've seen so that'd be a VERY interesting discussion
@wesmckenna82874 ай бұрын
@@redturtle820 yes please!!! That would be the most polite conversation ever recorded on video lol
@barryallen51274 ай бұрын
yeah Ryan do a video with him
@reeseedwards75433 ай бұрын
Thank you Ryan for standing firm on what faith in Jesus means, the only doctrine we all absolutely must get right. And for speaking truth in love. God bless brother.
@LiveIsChrist4 ай бұрын
Power chat guys. Justification through faith in Christ alone is so important🙏
@HellenicPapist4 ай бұрын
“You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.” James 2:24
@Jk-ow8ny4 ай бұрын
@@HellenicPapistas a catholic I don’t think they believe that dead faith alone justifies. They believe that faith which works through love justifies. Just like us catholic believe in that.
@HellenicPapist4 ай бұрын
@@Jk-ow8ny I know exactly what you mean with that, but technically on a theological and scriptural basis, it can lead to error or worse: intellectual faith alone.
@Austin-wu8mx4 ай бұрын
@@HellenicPapistnobody is arguing that “intellectual” faith justifies. True faith contains good works and a desire to be obedient, but those things don’t merit salvation they prove that faith is genuine.
@HellenicPapist4 ай бұрын
@@Austin-wu8mx You’d be surprised by the amount of evangelicals that believe you only need to “intellectually”(they don’t use that term, because they think believing He’s Lord is obeying) and/or trust Him alone, that you don’t need to show works at all.
@MrKreationsHD4 ай бұрын
So this guy thinks that roughly 56% of Christians I.e, Catholics and Orthodox are going to hell purely based off of his singular interpretation of the Bible. Absolutely wild!
@bigtobacco10984 ай бұрын
Everyone before the 1500's 😅😅😅
@PaperBagGambles4 ай бұрын
How narrow is the path?
@MrKreationsHD4 ай бұрын
@@PaperBagGambles Apparently as narrow as independent Protestants want to make... Even if its at the cost of separating itself from any sense of Church history, historical texts, or church tradition. Exactly what Bible would the Protestants have to come to these conclusions without the institutions of the Catholic and Orthodox churches?
@kri9094 ай бұрын
@@MrKreationsHDJust curious. What is NeedGodnet's religion?
@MrKreationsHD4 ай бұрын
@@kri909 Not sure honestly... First time I had seen his work.
@CatalyticChristian4 ай бұрын
Hey Ryan, I already believed all that you're teaching, but watching your videos has really helped me sharpen my evangelism approach and given me words to say what I already believed. Thanks so much for your content.
@NeedGodnet4 ай бұрын
So glad to hear that! Glory to God
@GogglesOstrich4 ай бұрын
@NeedGodnet I'm 100% sure children go to heaven (I believe in the same things you believe by the way. When itncoems to faith alone and basically everything). Based on these verses, which I know can be interpreted another way to say they aren't proof kids go to heaven but I think do have implication of that. 2 Samuel 12:23 ESV But now he is dead. Why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me." Matthew 19:14 ESV but Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven." Deuteronomy 1:39 ESV And as for your little ones, who you said would become a prey, and your children, who today have no knowledge of good or evil, they shall go in there. And to them I will give it, and they shall possess it. God bless and much love ❤️✝️
@raphaelfeneje4865 ай бұрын
Yo' this Collab is awesome! God bless you guys✝️❤️
@raphaelfeneje4864 ай бұрын
@@TheTruthsetsyoufree-j5s Work doesn't justify you. It's a result of you faith. You're justified by faith. Read the whole chapter, start from the first verse. James was talking to partial Christians that claim to be Christians, yet are hypocrites.
@sean99204 ай бұрын
REDEEMED ZOOMER NOW!?!? This is awesome.
@MankinaZoomer4 ай бұрын
If Faith Alone means no participation takes place in salvation then is repentance not necessary for salvation? What about Paul’s warnings to the Corinthians about sins that excommunicate them from the kingdom of God? Why would Paul warn of sins to an established church that would largely have already accepted Christ if there should be no fear of losing salvation?
@gambalombo4 ай бұрын
Inheriting the kingdom isn't the same as being in it
@gambalombo4 ай бұрын
Plus Paul told the Corinthians that God will confirm them until the end that they may be blameless in the day of judgement...
@MankinaZoomer4 ай бұрын
@@gambalombo yes it is used the same in the Bible
@MankinaZoomer4 ай бұрын
@@gambalombo so if they are destined to be confirmed why the warning of sin barring them from it? Makes no sense
@s-ense89714 ай бұрын
Simple because everyone ignores the passages that suit them 🤷🏽♂️ Catholics, Protestants etc… whoever will do his will.. will know the doctrine. John 7:17… anyone who will not DO the sayings of Christ is as a man who builds his house on sand..Matthew 7:26. Most don’t want to do Gods will.. they avoid dying to self which is what the gospel calls for. Whether that mean having faith in God and not tradition, or believing that when the Bible warns us about returning to sin it’s for a reason.
@MegaBlueMadness4 ай бұрын
I was from a more Baptist point of view for a long time and redeemed zoomed really convinced me hard this and other videos I’ve seen now, but this one was really thought provoking
@TheCrusadesWereAVibeLowkey4 ай бұрын
Big fan of both of your content so there’s nothing better than a long form chat like this, god bless!
@Tabthelad5 ай бұрын
Amazing chat, I love both of your guys videos. Awesome to see a collab!
@c.c.39824 ай бұрын
Zoomer is an excellent conversationalist. And I love how even though he concedes that your points are correct he articulates the viewpoint of how of someone who does have faith in Christ and does works at the same time might see it
@Ruben-vj1ox4 ай бұрын
Wooo two of my favorite christian content creator together to speak about God! Love you, God bless you all!
@ToriGanza21204 ай бұрын
Very good conversation guys, I love when two believers collab. This was very cool to watch. Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. Continue to walk in love and walk in Christ, rightly dividing the Word of God.
@midnighthymn5 ай бұрын
Your channel is awesome, man.
@NeedGodnet5 ай бұрын
I appreciate that! Glory to God
@iantea19604 ай бұрын
My jaw dropped when this video popped up on my page! I love you guys both!!!
@iantea19604 ай бұрын
@@TheTruthsetsyoufree-j5s In the context of the passage James is addressing outward justification, as in your good works demonstrate (are the fruits of) your faith. Paul uses the same example of Abraham in romans, I suggest you examine both passages with intellectual honesty and you will see we are justified in God's eyes by faith
@jessseee14 ай бұрын
THIS IS WHAT IVE BEEN WAITING FOR!!!!
@mcfarvo3 ай бұрын
God bless these two brothers in Christ
@DreaPark3 ай бұрын
On the question of someone having an understanding intellectually, then falling away. I married a man who was in seminary, he started using drugs, eventually abandoned me, and our son… he got another woman pregnant, they’ve since had the baby, and they are engaged, all while he and I are still currently married. He claims God blessed him with this woman, and baby to love and protect, all while abandoning the family God truly blessed him with. So yes. There is knowledge, but no heart change. He is worse than an infidel.
@jessicaspencer16834 ай бұрын
Reformed Baptist here (1689 London Baptist Confession). I embrace reformed theology but I do not believe in the Presbyterian view of Baptism and especially the infant baptism. Salvation is by faith alone and baptism is just a public declaration of identifying with Christ's death, burial, and resurrection or the public profession of faith. It is not something that saves you. But if you are saved, you should want to obey Christ and be baptized.
@joshuasy104 ай бұрын
I think you're position is reasonable given your understanding of baptism, but those who affirm infant baptism don't think it's just an outward proclaimation, they tie it with being cleansed from original sin and the focus is less on them as an individual, but more of a symbol of being brought into a new family, hense the obvious comparison with circumcision in the old covenant. There's also the fact that as far as I know all of Christendom has practiced infant baptism until relatively recently, and right now Catholic, Orthodox, and major Protestant denominations affirm it. How do you deal with these points?
@caseycardenas16684 ай бұрын
@@joshuasy10I think this topic is far more complex than many people realize. Prior to Augustine, it seems that Baptism had vast variety in terms of practice and theology. It's interesting to note that there are numerous early Church fathers who were born to Christian families that were not baptized as infants. Gregory of Nazianzus, Basil the Great, and John Chrysostom to name a few. On the other end we also have Hippolytus who mentions baptizing children and those who cannot speak for themselves, most likely referring to infants.
@david884974 ай бұрын
What do you think of Titus 3? Paul is clear
@david884974 ай бұрын
Baptism is meant to replace circumcision... which was done to infants
@JB-em9po4 ай бұрын
The Baptist idea of baptism being a public declaration is in my opinion partly true. Baptism is best done publicly, but if that’s all it is, you don’t see the apostles going out of their way to make it public. Many of the recorded baptisms are done in relatively private settings. They didn’t wait to get in front of the church body to do it. Instead, baptism should be thought of as the sign of entry to the new covenant. Circumcision was the sign of entry into the old covenant, baptism the sign of the new. Incidentally, if you study how the Old Testament and New Testament refer to circumcision, it was a sign that largely referred to the same spiritual reality as baptism. Yet, the sign given as a seal of righteousness by faith that Abraham had before he was circumcised was also given to his household. The members of his household were given the sign that signified faith, even at 8 days old. Things the line of thinking that led the reformers to accept infant baptism. God redeclares children of believers as covenantally set apart or holy in 1 Cor. 7, so they should receive the sign of the covenant, and the parents should disciple their children from day 1 as believers, praying for fruit and repentance for their children.
@MrChrisjoel054 ай бұрын
I love both your channels! Is both of your channels offers good content relevant for people who are so confused in their doctrines as well as people who never have looked further than their church doctrines. I Thank God for both of you. God bless you always. Keep it going!
@L3enjoyer1094 ай бұрын
Im a big fan of Redeemed zoomer and NeedGod so this collab was nice
@hitomukawakami71244 ай бұрын
You should speak with Young Anglican, that would be an interesting conversation. I feel like he makes a really strong case for Anglicanism
@skecchi32014 ай бұрын
This was a very refreshing conversation and thank you so much for uploading it!
@wesmckenna82875 ай бұрын
God bless! ❤
@hudsonsundbo1274 ай бұрын
Great convo Ryan and Zoomer!! It’s refreshing to see two believers have a chat on important issues while still agreeing on the essentials.
@NomosCharis4 ай бұрын
Zoomer is correct here. We are not saved by perfect understanding and assent to correct abstract doctrines but by trust in the living God. Also, while justification is by grace through faith alone, it necessarily leads to sanctification and true obedience, in which we are very, very active. Sanctification is absolutely necessary, and utterly non-meritorious.
@achilles11913 ай бұрын
Then follow the mosaic law if you are being obedient
@NomosCharis3 ай бұрын
@@achilles1191not under the law of Moses. Under the law of Christ (1 Cor 9:20-21)
@achilles11913 ай бұрын
@@NomosCharis Mathew 5:18. The law shall not pass till heaven and earth pass away. Did heaven and earth pass away? Roman’s 3:31 yea we establish the law
@achilles11913 ай бұрын
@@NomosCharis if the law is how we recognize sin. If the law is gone then there is no such thing as sin. So then how can you be obedient and how could you be damned?
@claytonwilson55333 ай бұрын
Gentlemen, I'd like to say this has been a great conversation to listen to. Ryan, thanks for your continuous help in opening up my understanding to scripture. I really appreciate your tone and delivery on your discussions. Jesus is Lord🙏
@meinradjeromelacap99494 ай бұрын
my two favorite content creators in one screen? God bless these two!
@snowfox42776 күн бұрын
How am I only seeing this now?!?!? I’m so glad I found this ❤
@niccolopaganini17824 ай бұрын
Love your energy man! Liked the collab as well, like how you're open to dialogue. ❤
@somebodiesuncle18664 ай бұрын
My revelation of Christ came through work so I can have faith hopefully he gives me grace for being grateful for the blood he pours on our sins
@Say_Jesus_is_Lord5 ай бұрын
The two best Christian content creators
@UniteAgainstEvil5 ай бұрын
No
@elijahonyoutube5 ай бұрын
@@UniteAgainstEvil dang 😅
@UniteAgainstEvil5 ай бұрын
@@elijahonyoutubehehe..well, OP could never justify that claim so my comment was easy ❤
@UniteAgainstEvil5 ай бұрын
@@CatfoodChronicles6737❤ love you
@ty.13115 ай бұрын
@@UniteAgainstEvilyou are a pretty odd individual
@yvonnecrozier45364 ай бұрын
Great conversation. Re the sacraments, they are not a work (ie something you do) so much as something you receive (desire to identify with Christs sacrifice), baptism once, communion over and over again
@HaggisOfDeath4 күн бұрын
For the Hebrew children, circumcision was not something they did, but something they received. It would be done to them when they were infants, usually on the 8th day. Christening or infant baptism is often done in a similar way, historically sometimes even on the 8th day though it became a topic of debate in the early church where Cyprian argued that it could be done immediately. So on the one hand, if circumcision is a work, then so is even infant baptism; on the other hand, it had become an issue of contention in the very Early Church with respected figures wanting to baptise as soon as possible, which clearly implies they believed it was important even to an infant baby that is unaware of the significance. I think the best thing to say is: we are supposed to partake in the sacraments because our Lord and Saviour told us to, just as we are supposed to be kind, charitable, patient, and other things which are clearly good works; but it is faith in our Lord alone that saves. He is sufficient, His sacrifice paid it all, nothing else is necessary, let us not diminish what He achieved on that cross in anyway; yet also, let us obey Him, and do good deeds. Faith comes first, and the works are the evidence of that faith.
@worldofjacob12914 ай бұрын
You've been doing so many amazing collaborations recently! It would be incredible to see you talk to Fr. Mike Schmitz or Trent Horn or someone.
@XX8474 ай бұрын
They both would have to being their kid gloves.
@LGM6333 ай бұрын
36:40 very nice how I feel about Catholics. Man I love everybody. Now let’s love and bring more in!
@bobsbobbs4 ай бұрын
Thoroughly enjoyed this conversation, God bless you both!
@NeedGodnet4 ай бұрын
So glad! Thank you
@Theofilus1444 ай бұрын
God does not bless false teachers
@bobsbobbs4 ай бұрын
@@Theofilus144 Yes, God won’t bless the Pope!
@Theofilus1444 ай бұрын
@@bobsbobbs bergoglio is not the pope. The chair is vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII.
@colin05164 ай бұрын
the contrast between the older christian’s soft tone and the younger christians fiery tone made the channel OP upload very enjoyable
@goldLuck14 ай бұрын
I am circumcised for medical and hygienic reasons, not because of faith. I hope the Lord will understand
@powerfulaura51664 ай бұрын
It was not done w/ the intention of being a work or law abidance unto salvation, & may not have even been of your own volition (i.e. you may have been a baby), so God willing it is perfectly understood, He knows everything after all.
@goldLuck14 ай бұрын
@@powerfulaura5166 I did it 4 weeks ago :)
@NeedGodnet4 ай бұрын
It's not sinful to get circumcised, Paul even got Timothy circumcised to not cause offence to the Jews (Acts 16:3). It's only wrong and will exclude you from heaven if you think it is required to do to go to heaven. Just like it also would if you think any other works are required as well, whether it be baptism, giving, church-going, fasting, etc.
@juan_xd424 ай бұрын
I was too circumcised for medical reasons
@Veritas_Christi4 ай бұрын
@@NeedGodnet1 Peter 3:21
@LtdMusic3 ай бұрын
God is Righteous and Just, walk in Christ and through Him we will be made so!
@Corderito724 ай бұрын
Baptism as a requirement is a false gospel? Why would we prioritize the teachings of Paul over the words of Jesus Christ?
@christophertaylor91004 ай бұрын
We ought not put them against each other, as if the Bible is in conflict. They are not prioritized over each other.
@Corderito724 ай бұрын
I’ve heard about the Trust in Christ terminology before. I love it. I have even heard of a trust in Christ leading to confidence. Confidence in Christ baby! He is the Savior of all who hearten to his words!
@ESteen08154 ай бұрын
Still think you need to have a good Catholic on. I keep hearing mistakes in articulating Catholic beliefs that go continually unchallenged.
@luiscid19002 ай бұрын
As a Catholic, I agree with you, sometimes what Catholics says is misunderstood from what the Catholic Church ACTUALLY teaches. (I fall into that sometimes)
@alazarkussito1938Ай бұрын
Hey NeedGod, we want to see you collab with Bob Wilkin, from Grace Evangelical Society. That would be awesome!
@TheSpider-hs4jo4 ай бұрын
Great discussion, love the Perry The Platypus plush 😂
@GringoXavierАй бұрын
Let’s get together. Ignore 1500 years of church history. And cast aspersions about Catholicism as if we have the authority to do so.
@Aaron-SLC5 ай бұрын
Now do jimmy akin
@phetmoz4 ай бұрын
Ooooooh boy
@A-ARonYeager4 ай бұрын
He would not be able to keep up with Jimmy
@Hithereitsme324 ай бұрын
💀😂 or Trent horn or unfourtunantly Peter dimond
@A-ARonYeager4 ай бұрын
@@TheTruthsetsyoufree-j5s what?
@Sm64wii4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@MrTripleAgamer2 ай бұрын
Great to think on, I think underplaying works as a necessary outworking of true saving faith is a disservice to Gods will for us. I sometimes get that from these conversations.
@duppy90125 ай бұрын
@27:45 But wouldn't being baptised be trusting in Jesus? seeing as he was the one who asked us to get baptised
@NATAR1605 ай бұрын
I think point is, do we need it in order to be saved? It seems u do it to show to men that u are in Christ. It's not sth u present b4 God to be added to complete ur salvation. Like, God demonstrating redemption to Cornelius even without being baptized. Peter commanding their baptism was not what granted them redemption b4 the Lord, but already possessed it far b4 the baptism. It's Jesus commanding us to spread the good news. I don't believe if u don't spread the Gospel u will goto hell.
@duppy90125 ай бұрын
@@NATAR160 I somewhat i agree i just think to say theres absolutely no point in being baptized if you can seems contradictory to what jesus said
@jacobmyhre37823 ай бұрын
Good listen, gents. Thanks.
@Sm64wii4 ай бұрын
I’ve never heard so many misrepresentations of what Catholics believe in such a short time. Initial justification is not merited by faith OR works, soley Gods grace.
@jhedjoardumago76914 ай бұрын
So what are the sacraments got to do with keeping salvation?
@loganjackson6753 ай бұрын
@@jhedjoardumago7691the sacraments are visible signs of inward grace. So by definition, they are the normative vehicles in which God uses to give us grace. It’s not something we “do” as a work but something received from God.
@MrJimwinder4 ай бұрын
Assurance is vital and 1 John is largely addressing it. I wish I had been taught the scriptures which could assure m way back when I first came to faith. I did eventually read all the hard perseverance passages on perseverance and the wonderful assurance passages too. Praise God I am saved and I understand why.
@rybojames41115 ай бұрын
What a great video and a great discussion.
@CrownedDiaries4 ай бұрын
28:53 - I think I’d say that if someone does a good “work” that God commanded then their faith isn’t in themselves or the work but in God…. They only even did the “work” because God said it was good.
@quantumcryptographer39985 ай бұрын
Again, after watching another video from these guys, I'm certain that being Catholic is a blessing I can never thank God enough for. I actually feel bad for protestants. It's ironic hearing their arguments against the Catholic/Orthodox church and other Protestants.
@GuiltFreeGaming4 ай бұрын
Bowing down and praying to a statue of Mary is breaking commandment number 2. Oh that’s right, Catholicism decided to remove commandment number 2 relating to idolatry…. Jesus said to call no man father on earth because you have one Father in heaven… Uh… this is embarrassing..
@MilesDei954 ай бұрын
Same for me. but they will slander us anyway
@thejerichoconnection34734 ай бұрын
@@GuiltFreeGamingthe 10 commandments don’t have a number in front of them in the Bible. There are many ways to regroup them to make them 10. The Jews have their way. The early Christian Church another. Protestants another. All are legitimate. There’s nothing to hide: the commandments are all there in full in Exodus and Deuteronomy. “For I became *your father* in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (1 Cor 4:15) I guess Paul hadn’t got the memo 🤦🏻 You brought up probably the two most ridiculous objections to Catholicism. It’s fine. You still have a long journey back home. I’ll pray for you. God bless you.
@reverendcoffinsotherson58074 ай бұрын
@@GuiltFreeGaming No, a bow is not worship, and nothing was removed from Exodus chapter 20 in the Catholic Bible if you bothered to read it. But continue to lie about us and continue your slander. It will go well for you.
@Hendrix_4 ай бұрын
I don't think Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism should be spoken of in correlation. There is a lot shared but also a lot more that separates us as denominations. I do agree though, this video seemed more of like a glaze fest between two guys who's beliefs correlate pretty much completely rather than a discussion that makes you interested.
@valeriereneeharper4 ай бұрын
The sincerity of your faith isn’t what makes it valid or invalid, it is the object of your faith that makes it valid or invalid. And the object of your faith better be Christ Jesus solely! Jesus is the only reliable object to put your faith into.
@richeratilano44834 ай бұрын
Never expected this collab
@Pelinca4 ай бұрын
Good friendly discussion between two brothers in Christ!
@St.MosestheBlack4 ай бұрын
Christ literally commanded baptism and linked it directly to salvation. “He that believeth AND IS BAPTIZED shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.” Mark 16:16
@oklol76164 ай бұрын
Not in the earliest manuscripts, so dangerous to base your doctrine of a verse that isn't in the earliest manuscripts
@St.MosestheBlack4 ай бұрын
@@oklol7616 false. It’s cited by the Church Fathers in the first century Church. Prior to the canon being complied.
@oklol76163 ай бұрын
@@St.MosestheBlackNo, most scholars will recognise that only the first 8 verses are in the earliest manuscripts. Cite 1 church father in the 1st century that cited Mark 16:16(Or any other verse after Mark 16:8 after Mark chapter 16)
@St.MosestheBlack3 ай бұрын
@@oklol7616 “Since Jesus died for everyone, believers and unbelievers, it is evident that not only belief but also baptism is required. For Jesus said, 'He who believes and is baptized shall be saved, but he who does not believe shall be condemned.' Belief alone is not sufficient, but the confession of that belief in baptism is also necessary.” - Origen (c. 184-253 AD) “He that believes and is baptized shall be saved; but he that does not believe shall be condemned.’ Yet this condemnation comes not from the mere non-believing, but from the rejection of the truth when it has been offered. Therefore, baptism is a means of accepting Christ, and rejection of baptism signifies rejection of Him.”- St. John Chrysostom (c. 349-407 AD) “When the Savior says, ‘He that believes and is baptized shall be saved,’ He does not mean that the water is more powerful than the Spirit, but that the water serves as a symbol and the Spirit sanctifies. Faith alone is dead without the works; and thus, baptism, which follows upon faith, is necessary for salvation.” - St. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 313-386 AD) “You have read, therefore, that the three witnesses in baptism, which bear testimony on earth, are one: the water, the blood, and the Spirit, and they bear witness to the salvation of our souls. And this is what is signified in the words of the Lord: 'He that believes and is baptized shall be saved.'” - St. Ambrose of Milan (c. 340-397 AD) “We are persuaded that no one can be saved without baptism; for the words of Christ are clear: ‘He who believes and is baptized shall be saved.’ The water of baptism brings the Spirit, and the Spirit brings life. This is why our Lord connects salvation not just to belief, but to the sacrament of baptism.” - St. Gregory Nazianzus (c. 329-390 AD)
@DanielTesenair2 ай бұрын
Are you sure he’s talking about water baptism? Baptism of the spirit happens at the time of salvation, which happens when we believe and have faith.
@yarobrock4 ай бұрын
At 28:23 he says that works are physical action and faith is not a work because it is simply trust. But I think this is counter to what scripture teaches. The reason faith isn’t a work is not because it isn’t physical. It’s because it is a gift from God. Otherwise you’d be able to boast about it. That would indicate it could be considered a work if it weren’t a gift. Ephesians 2:8-9 (HCSB): 8 For you are saved by grace through faith, and this is not from yourselves; it is God’s gift- 9 not from works, so that no one can boast. It’s the same idea in Romans. It’s not physical or mental activity in man that is essential, but the action of God on the behalf of his “vessels of mercy”. Romans 9:16 (HCSB): 16 So then it does not depend on human will or effort but on God who shows mercy.
@christophertaylor91004 ай бұрын
Faith is a work, but it doesn't save you. You respond in faith after BEING saved.
@thejerichoconnection34734 ай бұрын
It’s so funny to see Protestants discussing among themselves if Catholics have the right gospel, given that if it weren’t for the Catholic Church that compiled, preserved and transmitted the word of God, they wouldn’t even have a gospel at all.
@amandawhite45904 ай бұрын
You are attributing Gods work to fallen man….
@pchuck14394 ай бұрын
@@amandawhite4590 From Moses, to the prophets and the Apostles, throughout Salvation history God has used fallen men to bring us closer to him.
@amandawhite45904 ай бұрын
@@pchuck1439 absolutely- however claiming that the Bible is from man, is ridiculous. It is the Word of God.
@pchuck14394 ай бұрын
@@amandawhite4590 That's not the Catholic position. Scripture was written by men inspired by God. Paul was a man when he wrote his letters but was clearly inspired by the Holy Spirit. God spoke through him as he wrote. To deny this is to deny reality.
@masonmcgahey74 ай бұрын
@@pchuck1439yeah seems very straight forward. All Protestants believe this as well
@milenavaldez91524 ай бұрын
Thanks for your approach into Christianity Protestantism brave soldier of Jesus 🥳😇👍🙏🤍
@esserman16034 ай бұрын
I was hoping for this!
@LoganMartinez-i9n2 ай бұрын
the collab we didnt know we needed.
@albertyoung30254 ай бұрын
Next up: Trent Horn or Catholic Answers
@jonathans35804 ай бұрын
Talk to Christian B. Wagner
@kingshakah33804 ай бұрын
God bless you all brethren in Jesus Mighty name❤✝️
@ESWEGU5 ай бұрын
Ryan do you hold Calvinistic beliefs and or theology?
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
I was thinking this as well. Are you calvinistic?
@toofargonemcoc4 ай бұрын
he secretly does, his moderators promote double predestination
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
@@toofargonemcoc that's rather unfortunate. How could you believe in God when he punishes us for sins he made us do?
@toofargonemcoc4 ай бұрын
@@isaaccampos2393 dont take my word for it, ask his mods on his livestream if calvinism is true, and ask if double predestination is true
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
@@toofargonemcoc I will at some point, thank you for your response and time.
@SojiFro_02 ай бұрын
Great conversation. The Bible says that it’s our iniquities separate us from God (Is 59:2) not necessarily our sinful-nature which we inherited from Adam. Newborns are completely innocent of any iniquity, therefore they are not separated from God, therefore they do go to heaven if they were to die.
@TJMcCarty4 ай бұрын
13:00 It's Jesus who said "Whoever believes AND is baptized will be saved..." in Mark 16:16
@jettruth4 ай бұрын
You could also say whoever believes AND sins will be saved. Because you BELIEVE, you will be saved no matter what follows. Was the thief on the cross baptized with water? No. Baptism also refers to being baptized by the Holy Spirit. Lastly, the ending of Mark is not in the earliest manuscripts. Should you get baptized? Yes. When I was saved I had an overwhelming urge and desire to be baptized and do good works but I know I was saved before water baptism. Thinking you need anything else to be saved other than faith in Jesus is saying you don’t believe Jesus is enough.
@TJMcCarty4 ай бұрын
@@jettruth No, it's saying I believe Jesus was telling the truth when He said those who believe AND are baptized will be saved. I don't think we should ignore Jesus's words. We should believe Him and not do mental gymnastics to say "baptism" doesn't REALLY mean "baptism". That's what Satan did in the Garden of Eden, "Did God REALLY say...?" Jesus said it. We should believe it even if it doesn't line up with our current theology.
@Elrood4 ай бұрын
@@TJMcCarty And in act at some point gentiles receive the Holy Spirit and are saved only by believing the Gospel, without WATER BAPTISM, maybe instead of taking every scripture to yourself, study and see that there is clear transition of how God work with people, the Bible does tell us to rightly DIVIDE the word of truth for a reason, or else you should probably go and build an ark.
@oklol76164 ай бұрын
1:This verse is not in the earliest manuscripts, so it is dangerous to base your doctrine off this. 2: It says in the following passage that whoever doesn’t believe is condemned rather than those who aren’t baptised are condemned.
@Corderito724 ай бұрын
I would love to see more honest conversations like this between Christians that include LDS people too
@catholicocdpodcast4 ай бұрын
@ needGod net. Would you be willing to have a conversation about Catholic justification compared to the Protestant view? I personally don't think they are different as people think.
@axxel96264 ай бұрын
Have it here with me right now. I'll show you the true Gospel. Starting with Ephesians 2:8-9.
@axxel96264 ай бұрын
@@carsonianthegreat4672 nah fr?
@catholicocdpodcast4 ай бұрын
What is your point with ephesians? That we are saved( united to Christ) by grace through faith and not by works? Catholics believe the same thing@@axxel9626
@Emmanuel_EEE4 ай бұрын
@@axxel9626Do Protestants usually use two verses for their theology? Because those verses are clearly not talking about the gospel. 😂
@axxel96264 ай бұрын
@@Emmanuel_EEE i got like 60 verses representing the Gospel. The Gospel is so easy, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you'll be saved for eternity. It's not rocket science. And i ain't protestant
@CrownedDiaries4 ай бұрын
So technically it seems like 50:52 the gentleman is making assurance a type of work. By his own definition a work is something you do, so believing/assurance is something we do with our minds and the gentleman is saying it’s necessary
@upside_you_mop4 ай бұрын
If youre talkibg about ryan, i dont think hes saying assurance is necessary for salvation but rather saying that Christians ar any stage can have assurance.
@CrownedDiaries4 ай бұрын
@@upside_you_mop but see his language was “should” have it. Idk how he can say something is “should”. His definition of works even makes Jesus’ command to love our neighbors a work. Because love is definitely a verb
@langstongash93024 ай бұрын
@@CrownedDiaries good point. Even Jesus told people to repent for the kingdom is near. That sounds like a work based off of what I've heard him say. The Bible also says that if you believe in your heart and confess Christ with your mouth, you will be saved. That technically seems like a work too based off of his definition, because confessing verbally is something you do. But I think most people would recognize that any work being done is a result of faith in God and ultimately His doing.
@ivanpapac81584 ай бұрын
Do a video with Sam Shamoun
@David-we3sb4 ай бұрын
@@ivanpapac8158 this!!!!
@cyclqal4 ай бұрын
THIS!!!!
@David-we3sb4 ай бұрын
@@ivanpapac8158 this for sure!
@brandonoverlie4 ай бұрын
Not a bad idea at all
@jhedjoardumago76914 ай бұрын
Now that's the proper source for Catholicism input, not Voice of Reason.
@legovidz14 ай бұрын
You should talk to Jordan Cooper or Bryan Wolfmueller about Baptism vs Faith. Both Lutherans. They do a great job talking about the Lutheran view of how both are compatible!
@jacobhilderman4 ай бұрын
As a Catholic, I don’t understand how someone can use the example of Paul talking against circumcision as a reason to say we don’t need baptism. Yes if you think you need circumcision, Christ is of no use to you BECAUSE circumcision was the requirement of the old covenant, and we are not in the old covenant anymore. Paul also says that baptism replaces circumcision. If circumcision saves you in the old covenant, he seems like he thinks baptism saves you in the new covenant. Peter even says “baptism now saves you”
@jacobhilderman4 ай бұрын
Like i could not see Paul talking about baptism the way he talks about circumcision. I think Paul would be super scandalous if baptism doesnt save us.
@pchuck14394 ай бұрын
It's frustrating listening to NeedGod. He misrepresents the Catholic position and when corrected, he still misrepresents it. He thinks the Catholic Church teaches a false Gospel while literally preaching a false Gospel of Once Saved Always Saved.
@jacobhilderman4 ай бұрын
@@pchuck1439 yeah. He acts like we believe in pelagianism.
@mranumous4 ай бұрын
@@pchuck1439 OSAS is true?
@pchuck14394 ай бұрын
@@mranumous No. It's not Biblical and neither the Church nor the Apostles thought it. Satan believes in Jesus and he's not saved.
@CartiershiPs14 күн бұрын
Great conversation, praise Christ🎉🎉🎉
@davionknight5215 ай бұрын
Great Collab Ryan and Richard 🔥 waiting for Gavin collab and please continue focusing on Catholicism because very little Christians focuses on them since they are more focused in Church History than the Gospel.
@BrianRich16894 ай бұрын
And the Pentecostals ignore Church history and supplant the gospel with later restorationist views. Church history is our history. We Protestant greatly err in thinking that church history is Roman Catholic history.
@jovanic384 ай бұрын
A debate with Voice of Reason would be 🔥
@crazydogdog28314 ай бұрын
We’re not gonna talk about Calvinism? I almost left the faith based on Calvinism. It’s so false. Yes, there are some scripture that seems like it could support it, but it doesn’t. I believe that’s more important than talking about Catholics in this video. For example though, in the beginning he asked the guy “how do you get to heaven” (roughly), and the guy said “through Jesus alone, putting faith in what He did”. That’s a contradiction, if God chose you, it doesn’t matter if you put faith in Him or not, He chose you right? I just believe the Calvinism view takes out free will. It hurts my brain to even think about it. I dug deep on it a few months ago and found myself in a hole. Jesus pulled me out of that hole
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
I agree with you against calvinism. Ultimately, if God chose some and rejected others, God would have to ensure this by being in complete control of our actions. The mystery of calvinism is god makes us sin, and punishes us for it.
@crazydogdog28314 ай бұрын
@@isaaccampos2393 100%. There are always two sides of the coin. If God chooses for someone to be saved, then God also chooses for someone to not be saved. That’s evil in my eyes. It would be limited free will almost.
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
@@crazydogdog2831 Precisely. I seems to also defeat the purpose of love. What kind of love is love that is forced. It's not love at all.
@isaaccampos23934 ай бұрын
I haven't watched the whole video, but I was a bit worried when Ryan said he agreed with regeneration before faith. I wonder if he's a reformed baptist(if he believes in tulip)
@LoverImYoursk4 ай бұрын
@@crazydogdog2831 God is under no obligation to save anyone. He can show mercy to whomever He wants and show His justice to whomever He wants. That doesn't make Him evil.
@georgegreen7114 ай бұрын
1:15:34 In the case of the people on North Sentinel Island or whatever who haven't heard the Gospel yet, I would point out the case of Enoch, who "walked with God, and was not; for God took him.", because in Romans 1 it says that a human being can look at the creation and see that there is a God and choose to worship the Creator rather than the creation, but most people don't because their hearts are evil and darkened by sin. This decent, almost saintly man then, if he doesn't hear the Gospel and submit to it and gain saving faith in Christ in this life; I believe, that on Judgement Day, as someone who would choose Christ in response to the Holy Spirit drawing him in this life, (had he been born in a place where the Gospel available), would fall to his knees and cry out, "My Lord and my God!", on seeing Christ enthroned in all His glory. (Obviously the Spirit would be drawing the man to Christ, but he wouldn't have access to the full revelation of God through Christ in the Scriptures.)
@willire88115 ай бұрын
Yes yes yes
@billotron55214 ай бұрын
Watching this at the gym. Thx for the entertainment ✝️❤️
@somebodiesuncle18664 ай бұрын
I ❤the Catholic Church
@UncleVuitton4 ай бұрын
I never thought i'd see this collab
@mihaivesa77195 ай бұрын
very good collab
@Agape-Jesus4 ай бұрын
I enjoy this channel immensely and the views shared help me with areas where I am not fully developed. Having said that, I would love to see a discussion between you and FR Stephen De Young. Please invite him to a discussion at soonest opportunity:)
@carterwoodrow48054 ай бұрын
I think the problem is the definition of work. I find it funnny that in galatians paul says baptism is not a work, Galatians 3:26-27 ESV [26] for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. [27] For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. I think this is rather clear, baptisk is not our work, but God's, now obviously if someone believes they sre saved by their baptism then they arent trusting in christ, but what abous someone who believes there baptism, saved them and was efficacious unto salvation, because of their faith. Meaning that they received salvation in baptism by faith
@jhedjoardumago76914 ай бұрын
Yeah, but baptism will never save. It's could lead to faith, or a result of faith. But it never saves.
@carterwoodrow48054 ай бұрын
@@jhedjoardumago7691 the problem is, the bible used the language "baptism now saves you" so whatever that means, it does me that we are able to say baptism now saves. So because the bible says "baptism saves", I say, "baptism saves". Now what does that mean? I agree with redeemed zoomer, it is the distinction between sign and thing signifed which can properly be spoken of as one sacrament
@jhedjoardumago76914 ай бұрын
@@carterwoodrow4805 give us the verse where you find "baptism saves", along with the verses around it for context.
@carterwoodrow48054 ай бұрын
@@jhedjoardumago7691 1 peter 3:21 (baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the flesh but as an appeal to God through a good conscience). What that verse means can be debated, but either way, we can say baptism saves, because the bible says baptism saves.
@carterwoodrow48054 ай бұрын
@@jhedjoardumago7691 sure, we can include that there. It's not my point. My point is that the bible says baptism saves, there I will say baptism saves.
@LtdMusic3 ай бұрын
The works of Salavation come through the walk in the Holy Spirit with Jesus Christ as our Saviour from sin, thanks to the Living Gods Love and Grace, so that no one may boast - All the Glory to God for ever and ever - HolyHolyHoly! :)) Amen!
@Sinha0104 ай бұрын
What a disappointing video. 2 Protestants disagreeing on if baptism is a work and is required shows that "Bible alone" doesn't work.
@---bl2uj4 ай бұрын
disagreements and discussions don't negate from the fact that only the Bible is an infallible authority. you have countless disagreements throughout members of the RCC and orthodox churches. just because there's a higher authority doesn't mean what they're declaring as true/infallible is correct.
@Sinha0104 ай бұрын
@---bl2uj The disagreements in the apostolic churches are not on the basics. It''s on other things like the hypostatic union, iconoclasm, purgatory, Marian doctrine. Protestants can't agree on anything.
@---bl2uj4 ай бұрын
@@Sinha010 that's completely false. protestants have a lot more unity than you think on salvific issues and we acknowledge that the Church is a living organism of believers everywhere not just in our institutions. also i feel like the issues you mentioned are pretty big ones lol
@JoshuaOpell4 ай бұрын
@@---bl2ujThe problem is is that we have different bibles. There was also several hundred years of debate on the canon of scripture in the early church. Protestants took books out of the canon and therefore can’t consistently hold to sola scriptura. The Church and its councils are the authority because they’re the tradition that Christ established. He never gave you a Bible but a Church.
@Sinha0104 ай бұрын
@---bl2uj It's not false. As you can see on this video, they can't agree on baptismal regeneration, and that has been resolved since the apostles. Baptism saves. You can have on the same block a fundamentalist Baptist, church, a Reformed Baptist church, a Presbyterian church and a Prosperity Church and they will all doubt the others' salvation
@JoshuaAkapo4 ай бұрын
From looking into Ephesians 2:8-10 this is the understanding I get from it. This is how the 3 verses make sense to me. I would love to get your thoughts on it. Salvation is by the grace of God which is a gift, we receive this gift by faith We can’t say it is by our own doing by working for it because God already made us to do good works. Like a fish can’t boast about swimming and a bird cant about flying, we can’t boast about what we were made to do. Real faith is therefore a working faith because we can’t say we have faith in Christ and not do what he made us for. However this working faith alone still does not mean we are saved as we still sin and we are born into a fallen world. Salvation is ultimately then by the grace of God, we get this by having faith and we have faith by doing the good works we were created for. I also looked into the direct disciples of the apostles, Ignatius, Polycarp and Clement of Rome all wrote about faith in a similar way. That faith goes hand in hand with work works. Regardless I’d love your thoughts on the way I’ve understood the passage in Ephesians
@MrJohnmartin20095 ай бұрын
Every passage these two commentators go to in St Paul's corpus they both assume the word meaning associated with their denomination and a version of atonement theory associated with faith and justification excluding works. Presumably the Protestant Christian assumes a form of penal substitution theory which requires the instrumentality of faith. Where does the bible and/or tradition teach faith is an instrument when there is no evidence Abraham's faith was an instrument? The bible never teaches faith is an instrument of justification. Why believe faith is an instrument and man is justified by faith alone when no text says a man is justified by faith alone? Why believe faith apart from works of the law means faith alone when hope saves and faith without love is worthless?
@bjornlarsen74404 ай бұрын
“Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.”
@MrJohnmartin20094 ай бұрын
@@bjornlarsen7440 The typical faith and works argument ignores the context of St Pauls letters and additional information given in other letters, the gospels and church history. Faith alone requires sophistic argumentation presuming faith alone is a fictional truth claim.
@bjornlarsen74404 ай бұрын
@@MrJohnmartin2009 I agree brother you can have faith that moves mountains but without love you are nothing. Faith has to produce love for God and fellow man. Without that faith is dead.
@MrJohnmartin20094 ай бұрын
@@bjornlarsen7440 Justification is through an interior regeneration associated with faith, hope and love presumed in Abraham's life contrary to the Prot alien righteousness and an extrinsic imputation of Jesus righteosuness.
@christophertaylor91004 ай бұрын
How can you say that the Bible never teaches that Abraham's faith is instrumental when the Bible clearly states that? Galatians 3: 5-6, anyone?