My wife is currently in labor with our first child on Reformation Day! She was induced this morning. Praise God!
@The.Orthodox.Christian17 күн бұрын
Congratulations! Prayers for your family ❤️🙏☦️
@BarkotSentayehu17 күн бұрын
Name him lurher
@shannonmorgan286617 күн бұрын
@@BarkotSentayehu my wife won’t let me name our daughter Luther unfortunately!
@JustinCage5617 күн бұрын
Congratulations! May God bless you and your growing family!
@matthewschwanke328417 күн бұрын
@@shannonmorgan2866 what about Lutherett
@the_ejumper_080417 күн бұрын
This video came out not even 5 minutes after I almost failed my history test over the Protestant Reformation
@Reformed_Thinker16 күн бұрын
Bro gotta do his studying
@unit239416 күн бұрын
The Reformation is one of the most interesting parts of history to me. I took a Renaissance and Reformation class in college and it was one of my favorite classes ever because of the Reformation part.
@fresholiveoil649016 күн бұрын
"I can't imagine how hard that must have been... To be in France." My mom grew up there. But you're right.
@EmmaBerger-ov9ni13 күн бұрын
Why is it trendy to hate France these days?
@9DB74 күн бұрын
@@EmmaBerger-ov9ni Because it's funny ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@StarArtGamerСағат бұрын
9:56
@StarArtGamerСағат бұрын
@@EmmaBerger-ov9ni They went to extreme on the French Revolution in in the Paris 2024 Olympics
@SingABrightSong17 күн бұрын
Well, Zoomer being nice to the Baptists was fun while it lasted.
@michaelg491917 күн бұрын
true. He conveniently left out Methodists so he can group baptists not with them
@KOENations17 күн бұрын
Non-Denominationals look over at you: "First time?" Meme 😂
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
He is just being consistent. The Baptist tradition did not come from the reformation, they came later from the Anglican church. And Baptist ideas were similar in a lot of aspects with the Anabatists that were considered herectics by all the magisterial reformers. All Reformers were against credobaptism and only Zwingli was memorialist.
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
@@michaelg4919The Methodist Church is not from the reformation. They came later during the First Great Awakening.
@fighterofthenightman105716 күн бұрын
@@michaelg4919 Methodists baptize infants, believe in the efficacy of the Sacraments and believe Church tradition has authority…? Hardly comparable from Baptists, who are miles apart from all Protestants who came before them besides the Anabaptists.
@SantaFe1948416 күн бұрын
One of the reasons why American evangelical churches are the way they are is because the Baptists' and Methodists' way of doing church was more compatible with life on the frontier than that of the Anglicans and Presbyterians.
@redeemedzoomer605316 күн бұрын
this is correct
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
baptism theology is what if a new age person interpreted the Bible and tried to adapt it to his world. Everything is a symbol, you just have to rely on the power of your belief and this text here the Bible is a very ancient text of secret mysteries unknown to men, read it and eventually its mysteries will be revealed to you. This is baptist theology 101. That's why is so easy common to be baptist, it's literally mimics new unorganised exoteric religions
@BoScotty16 күн бұрын
You mind explaining this more in detail?
@SantaFe1948415 күн бұрын
@@BoScotty First of all, I first heard this idea from watching "A Survey of Church History" by Dr. W. Robert Godfrey. I wish he would have explained it in more detail, but he didn't. He is Reformed, so I don't think he would intentionally make up something like that. I surmise that people of the frontiersmen persuasion were more attracted to simplicity than elegance. It would be very hard to build a church with stained glass windows and religious art on a remote settlement when you barely have enough resources to build a simple church and all the houses.
@malachirodriguez516211 күн бұрын
@@BoScotty Their worship style was less formal and more focused on personal experiences of faith, which really resonated with settlers who didn’t have access to big church buildings or clergy all the time.
@FF-iz4su16 күн бұрын
1:45 clever that you play, “O Mighty Fortress is Our God” in the background since Martin Luther actually wrote that hymn and it’s one of my favorites:)
@joshuareeves510316 күн бұрын
I understand why you generalized baptists and put them over on the "not part of the reformation" side but I'm one of your Baptist listeners here to remind you that there were two separate streams that created what we now call baptist. There was the ana baptist tradition deriving from Meno Simons, and then there was the particular baptist tradition born out of the reformed tradition from the Chruch of England Puritan movement. Would be great if you acknowledged this during these types of videos. 1689 LBC fellas are a big part of the Baptist tradition and do value scripture, reason and tradition greatly.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
Baptist weren't trying to reform the church but rather recreate christianity from scratch, they believed everything was wrong, it's hard to find 1 thing they could agree with the church fathers.
@humbledservant969316 күн бұрын
He won’t acknowledge Reformed Baptists/Particular Baptists because it’s his way to be ignorant to the truth. If he starts to acknowledge them as brothers in the reformed tradition, he would start to see the holes in his theological convictions. So, he chooses to group reformed brothers as not reformed as a way stay ignorant. He’ll consider modern Lutherans (which some still hold to reformed truths) as more reformed than reformed baptists because Lutherans get their babies wet (not seen in the Bible) and reformed baptists who submerge professing believers (seen in the Bible). It’s ok, the gospel unites! One day we will all worship God together and this animosity towards other brothers will come to an end.
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
What you said is true. Sometimes I think that RZ has a big grudge against the Baptists because they use the name "Reformed" and this hinders his objectivity. That said, we need to recognize that Baptists, even Particulars, adhered to many ideas that were rejected by reformers, such as credobaptism. It is a mixture of ideas from magisterial reform and radical reform. It would not be honest to say that they are traditional or historic Protestants.
@joshuareeves510316 күн бұрын
@@pedroguimaraes6094 I would disagree with this. I don't quite understand where you feel the need to draw the line. Every tradition has differences. Just because Baptist's held to ideas rejected by others isn't surprising. It wouldn't be it's own tradition if it agreed with everyone. The reformed tradition adhered to many ideas that were rejected by Lutherans. This doesn't delegitimize it's roots in the protestant reformation. The credo Baptist perspective isn't about radical reform but trying to return to the apostolic deposit. Calvin himself believed we moved toward pedobaptism from credobaptism in the early church despite himself believing in pedobaptism.
@MarkStein-t7d15 күн бұрын
@@joshuareeves5103 it’s important for protestants to draw the line, because if protestantism only means protesting the Catholic Church, then all kinds of heretics will be protestants, not only the heretics who deny that the icons are permitted (7th ecumenical council) or those who deny that Mary is the Mother of God (3rd ecumenical council) but even those who deny that Jesus is from the same substance of the Father (1st ecumenical council) or that the Holy Spirit is God (2nd ecumenical council) So the only way to make a distinction between the two kinds of deniers of the ecumenical councils is to make a cronological distinction between the reformers and any non-catholic christian church that came latter.
@joshuajohansen121017 күн бұрын
7:43 - Wish you talked a little more about his beliefs. Tyndale believed in baptism by immersion, a memorial view of the eucharist, a literal understanding of Scripture, translating the Bible not just into English but from the original languages instead of Latin.
@fresholiveoil649017 күн бұрын
The OG Baptist?
@joshuajohansen121016 күн бұрын
@@fresholiveoil6490 Maybe, lol
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
All protestants have a literal view of Scripture. The difference is that some are ok using deductive inferences from it (historical protestants) while somes don't (usually Baptist). As the Westminster Confession of Faith chapter 1 says: "The whole counsel of God, concerning all things necessary for His own glory, man’s salvation, faith, and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men."
@charles2113716 күн бұрын
@@pedroguimaraes6094 Baptist are actually fine with not taking a literal interpretation when it contradicts their view. Like when Jesus said you must be born of water and spirit, they use all sorts of mental gymnastics to say “well, he’s referring to birth!!!” This is obviously wrong because using water to describe birth wasn’t a thing untill the 15th century.
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
@@charles21137 Thats true, thats why their exegesis is inconsistent. They don't want to use inferences with topics like "Infant Baptism", or "sacraments as means of grace" because, according to them, that would contradicit Sola Scriptura, but they accept doctrines like the Trinity and Hipostatic Union that are based on inferences from Scripture. Jesus himself used the OT Scripture to make inferences is in His response to the Sadducees in Matthew 22:31-32. The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, so they questioned Jesus to challenge this doctrine. Jesus responded by quoting Exodus 3:6, where God says, “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” Jesus then explains that God “is not the God of the dead, but of the living,” making the inference that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were alive with God, thus supporting the resurrection.
@TravelerZ2417 күн бұрын
Hope you have fun going as Luce for Halloween tomorrow
@MarioHDG6416 күн бұрын
😂😂
@hunter7055816 күн бұрын
Bro got so angry at a catholic doll lol
@IanCarl3716 күн бұрын
@@hunter70558 I can't see anything angry about the comment. Heaven forbid someone make a joke
@Janika28417 күн бұрын
@Redeemed Zoomer I am not a Protestant, but I deeply respect them. Luther's determination, Calvin's discipline, Zwingli's courage and the faith of the others all contributed to such a beautiful Protestant worldview. I've been following your work for a while now and overall, thank you for these many quality videos. On this day, let Christians (or at least Protestants for sure) remember these great people. God bless you!
@TheNabOwnzz17 күн бұрын
Sounds like you need to become Protestant.
@thatiowan358117 күн бұрын
Happy All Saints Day Eve!
@andrewrolwes603416 күн бұрын
Oh holy Saints of God, ora pro nobis!
@carsonianthegreat467210 күн бұрын
Halloween is just old timey English for All Saint’s Eve.
@thatiowan358110 күн бұрын
@@carsonianthegreat4672 uh-huh?
@micahtewersofficialКүн бұрын
These videos are incredible. Great work!
@mommytheape18 күн бұрын
When are you you going to make another one of those, "Understanding Denominations" videos? I really want to see Oriental Orthodoxy, Assyrian church of the East, Pentecostal, Anglican, Methodist, and Congregationalist. Also Happy Reformation Day!!!!!!!
@Chance_Rice18 күн бұрын
Why celebrate the beginning of the fall of the holy Roman Empire
@mommytheape16 күн бұрын
@@Chance_Rice what?
@JS_Guitar0916 күн бұрын
He can't make one for Anglicanism because even the Anglicans don't know what they believe 😂
@mommytheape16 күн бұрын
Right
@ngzchongsoon914714 күн бұрын
@@JS_Guitar09😂😂😂😂😂
@ApostolicStorm16 күн бұрын
“As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.” - Romans 3:10-11 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.” - 2 Timothy 4:3-4
@kylie574117 күн бұрын
IS MEANS IS!!!! (Also great video! Happy Reformation Day everyone)
@joshuajohansen121018 күн бұрын
Super excited for this one, so many great names in the thumbnail!
@EF-111-18 күн бұрын
This showing up so early before it premieres is diabolical.
@darnit194414 күн бұрын
As a soon to be Catholic, i'll say blessed are you Protestants for you have revealed the errors of the Catholic church. This allows the church to fix her problems. This also shows how the holy spirit is still guiding the church, as promised to saint Peter. May y'all have a blessed day, and bring glory to God.
@AyEhm-ii2dp14 күн бұрын
God bless.
@legodavid926013 күн бұрын
Problem is, the Catholic Church still outright refused to fix most of their problems, because they held to their false belief that they are the one true Church and therefore cannot err, even though they constantly did.
@jayset913613 күн бұрын
don't become catholic
@AyEhm-ii2dp13 күн бұрын
@legodavid9260 Examples?
@gamingterrain370312 күн бұрын
@legodavid9260 the one true Church cannot err. The only things that needed fixing were the abuses that occurred, those were fair criticisms, but the Church has never and will never err in terms of official doctrine. Christ's Church cannot fall away and start teaching false doctrine. That is impossible and it diminishes our Lords promise to always guide his Church.
@o.o.225517 күн бұрын
As a prior protestant, and now Catholic, well done! Love the truth and facts of history not found in the bible. Thanks RZ!!! God bless you - With Love as Jesus Loves
@joshuajohansen121017 күн бұрын
10:40 - The Catholics did not just go "a bit" to far, their Marian devotion was a huge problem for the Reformers. Yes, many Reformers believed by default in some doctrines like the perpetual virginity. But they also warned against how the devotions to Mary was taking the place of Christ (one reason why Solus Christus is so important).
@kristianrodriguez467617 күн бұрын
Well the Catholic Church doesn’t say that Mary is essential for Salvation. The church teaches that without Jesus there is no other way. Just not that you can have faith alone, and then disobey God in every other aspect of your life and expect that he’ll give you the gift of grace and salvation (which is never EARNED).
@michaelxx877617 күн бұрын
This unfortunately kept me out of the Catholic Church. I love Catholics, I love the Catholic Church, I love the history. I was able to get past a lot of things like purgatory, the papacy, transubstantiation, etc… I just could not get past the Marian dogmas and devotion… So I knew I could never truly be Catholic because deep down inside I just didn’t believe in them. I’d be lying to myself. That, and seeing Marian devotion in practice made it even worse. Who knows.. Maybe God will bring me to Rome one day, but for now my conscious just isn’t there.
@kristianrodriguez467617 күн бұрын
@ Why can’t you bring yourself to acknowledge her virginity, immaculate conception, and assumption, if you basically recognize every other tradition.
@daviddavenport935016 күн бұрын
@@kristianrodriguez4676 i believe in her virginity before the Nativity.....but afterward it is pretty clear in scripture that she had several children.....as for her assumption....that is questionably church theology....
@legodavid926016 күн бұрын
@@kristianrodriguez4676The Catholic Church teaches that The Assumption of Mary is an absolutely essential belief that all Catholics need to hold to, and those who refuse to acknowledge it are officially anathema, as per Pope Pious XII's statement.
@christopherfilip694916 күн бұрын
Just a small correction about Hus and Moravians. The church that carried the legacy of Hus the most is the still extant Hussite Church, while the Moravians, or the Unity of the Brethren as they are called here in Czechia, follow the teachings of Petr Chelčický. And the Brethren at their begining were actually discriminated by both the catholics and the hussites, as they were even more extreme than hussites in various ways. Funny thing is, we evangelicals (the Brethren Church, to be exact) actually look up to the legacy of Unitas Fratrum a lot and try to carry it in here too, since their teachings and leaders are common knowledge in here (like Jan Amos Komenský/Comenius for exmaple)
@theankotze129212 күн бұрын
“I can’t imagine how hard it must be…to be in France” Amen, brother! Preach!
@iblameabel18 күн бұрын
Should do a series series where you go through every reformers theology. Each video dedicated to one reformer. Call it “Reformed Fathers”
@anycyclopedia18 күн бұрын
More like "Revolutionary Fathers."
@Thatoneguy-pu8ty18 күн бұрын
@@anycyclopediaYeah the gospel is a revolutionary idea. Pretty crazy to know that God remits our sins on the basis of simple faith.
@pedroguimaraes609418 күн бұрын
@@Thatoneguy-pu8tyIt is also crazy that the Word of God spoken by the Profets and the Apostles has more authority than what a bunch of humans have to say. Crazy.
@anycyclopedia18 күн бұрын
@@Thatoneguy-pu8ty Yeah, but the Protestant "Reformers" actually "Protested" against the Church of Christ.
@Thatoneguy-pu8ty17 күн бұрын
@@anycyclopedia And? We should always protest against whatever entity or person or power attempts to smother the pure and true gospel, in which the righteousness of God is revealed, by faith from first to last, so that the just might live by faith.
@SaintsHistoryProject16 күн бұрын
had a couple of these fellas planned for later in the year. I'm coming for ya Redeemed Zoomer.
@Migstaper16 күн бұрын
Hey Ackerman I’m thankful to the Lord for the teaching you do and give to everyone for free ❤ . Thank you brother.
@B5980018 күн бұрын
Reformation Day >>>> Halloween
@Thatoneguy-pu8ty18 күн бұрын
Bruh what even is Halloween?
@olekcholewa817117 күн бұрын
Eve of All Saint's Day>>>>
@BenedictusBrave17 күн бұрын
@@olekcholewa8171 real
@iamdigory17 күн бұрын
The message of all saints day is far more central to protestant Christianity than the message of reformation day.
@user-in1yw9ty5t17 күн бұрын
Halp
@MrLesonfireforGod15 күн бұрын
I'm a Seventh-day Adventist. We believe the Lord is using us to finish what He started with all the Reformers you mentioned in this video. There were more truths lot during the Dark Ages that needed to be proclaimed again. For more, check out a great video series called "Keepers of the Flame".
@albionblue1236 күн бұрын
You every other new church. JW’s, Mormons, all have their own “prophet”
@A_Poor_Fellow_SoldiersOfChrist16 күн бұрын
The Lutherans were right to not accept Melancthon's compromises to unite with the Calvinists. Unity must never come at the expense of important doctrines.
@cornegieselbach16 күн бұрын
Love how you just ignore that Calvin burned Anabaptists but slam the Catholic church for it the entire video and not actually talking about the early bible translations that were very inaccurate translations
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
These are half-truths tbh: Calvin did approve the burnt of Anabaptist, but it is incorrect to say that Calvin burned them. He did not have direct legal authority to execute anyone. The executions of heretics, including the burning of Michael Servetus, were carried out by the civil authorities of Geneva ( the Genevan Councils, of which Calvin was not a part, although he was influential). While Calvin held a prominent role in the Consistory, which advised the councils on religious matters, his influence was limited to making recommendations. Early vernacular translations of the Bible, both Catholic and Protestant, did have inconsistencies and translation errors, partly because translators were working from a limited set of manuscripts, some of which contained copyist errors or variations. However, the Protestant Reformers placed a strong emphasis on accurate translation and scholarly review, aiming to make the scriptures accessible to laypeople in a form as close to the original texts as possible Tyndale was accused of mistranslation for doctrinal purposes, while Catholic translations like the Douay-Rheims, also an early English Bible, aimed to support Catholic doctrine. Both sides improved their translations over time as more Greek and Hebrew texts became available.
@ariyune700716 күн бұрын
Okay then; Jan Hus was also burned by the state and not by the catholic church. So why did Redeemed zoomer try to claim they did?@@pedroguimaraes6094
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
Calvin had more legal power to burn people in Geneva than any Pope had to burn anyone even in Spain. Calvin was literally the political leader of Geneva, while the Pope was a spiritual leader and didn’t even have a legal way to kill people, he could only judge them and sent them to the state to be punished and in 5% of the cases the punishment was death
@SirMicahBroch16 күн бұрын
Calvin did not burn or kill anybody in Geneva. By the time Servetus was killed, Calvin still had no civil authority and was not even a citizen at the time.
@carsonianthegreat467210 күн бұрын
@@pedroguimaraes6094the Catholic Church didn’t have direct authority to burn anyone either. The state did the executioning. In that way Calvin is no different. And Wycliffe’s Bible was notoriously polemic. It purposefully mistranslated words to support his Lollard theology. For example, he mistranslated Ecclesia as “congregation” instead of “church,” which is just silly. Early Catholic vernacular translations were so faithful to the original texts that they would do word-for word translations in the margins so that both languages were visible to the reader. Wycliffe never did that. Wycliffe wasn’t even the first to translate scripture into English. Catholic monks had been doing it for centuries - the Anglo-Saxon Glosses.
@nerdtalk178917 күн бұрын
9:50 I laughed hard and loud at this
@ЭйденПирс-и8т16 күн бұрын
Same, France sounds like hell on the earth :D
@ChristopherReid-i1d15 күн бұрын
Luther was no immediately kicked out for his 95 theses. Scholars in the church responded to them, and there were many discussions but Luther kept going more extreme because he was funded by Jews and sinful German kings looking to avoid expensive indulgences for their terrible sins.
@carsonianthegreat467210 күн бұрын
Tithes* not indulgences
@АлександрКорнеев-ч5э17 күн бұрын
The best way to spend 31 october - to watch some videos about reformation
@PauTheDeo16 күн бұрын
thirty firth?
@nikmonk109816 күн бұрын
@@PauTheDeo- Go easy on him, he’s from Barcelona…I mean, Russia. English has a lot of quirks.
@АлександрКорнеев-ч5э16 күн бұрын
@@PauTheDeo thanks
@pepehaydn703914 күн бұрын
Horror films they are and the Devil the Producer.
@nikmonk109814 күн бұрын
@@pepehaydn7039 - It’s true that Luther (one of the most interesting personalities in history) had some pretty horrific opinions on the peasants’ revolt, and on the Juice.
@kaymojil766916 күн бұрын
I coincidentally did some first time research about Martin Luther this morning. Cool, thanks
@Demoniodg16 күн бұрын
Should read bout his book called "on the jews and their lies" it's so cool, he was such a pure pius man
@user-Strong.Trinitarian16 күн бұрын
@@Demoniodg Who cares about the jews anyway. Don't listen to this reprobate demon, read Luther's book on " the bondage of the will"!
@kaymojil766915 күн бұрын
@@Demoniodg that’s okay, the point is to stick to scripture to tell me what to think, not men. So scripture does not shy away from saying both that the Jews have been rebellious and hardened to the truth BUT that it is for our benefit because without their disobedience the gentiles would not have received the Gospel.
@EliB20716 күн бұрын
10:33 is that PROTESTANT APOLOGETICS I HEAR!!!
@Thatoneguy-pu8ty18 күн бұрын
HERE I STAND I CAN DO NO OTHER 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🏵️✝️
@JoWilliams-ud4eu17 күн бұрын
🔥 🔥 🔥
@TheNabOwnzz17 күн бұрын
@@Thatoneguy-pu8ty I think he didn't actually say that.
@skark122217 күн бұрын
@@TheNabOwnzzhe actually said: „Hier stehe ich, ich kann nicht anders.“
@TheNabOwnzz17 күн бұрын
@@skark1222 No, i mean, i think that last sentence of his famous Worms speech was a fabrication that was added later.
@skark122216 күн бұрын
@@TheNabOwnzz I guess we´ll never know
@edwardyates880016 күн бұрын
Hey Redeemed Zoomer, Thanks for this - it's quite an ambitious undertaking to try to cover so many figures in such a short period of time. I wouldn't be daring enough to try! I just wanted to comment on a couple of the things you said about Richard Hooker because, while they are central to the popular conception of him, even in Anglican circles, they're not quite accurate. I'm a Church of England priest and I did my dissertation on Richard Hooker at Oxford University as part of my training. There is, if not quite a 100% consensus, then nevertheless a heavy majority in Hooker scholarship in favour of the idea that the 'Via Media' is an anachronism. The term itself is a 19th century coinage and was promoted by the same sorts of Anglo Catholic figures who you say ignore the 39 Articles. 'Via Media' is to Hooker as 'Tract 90' is to the Articles. It's true that Hooker was more irenic by temperament than many (though not all) of the reformers and so if you compare his writings to those of the 'hotter' kind of protestant, he comes across as softer on Catholicism. Some scholars, such as Peter Lake, would view him as being a bit arminianising. Nevertheless, he and the Elizabethan Church were determinedly protestant and if there is a middle way they sought, it passes between Wittenberg and Geneva, not Rome and Geneva. It's a similar story with the 'three-legged stool' idea. It's popular in the modern Church of England, especially among those who want to find a compromise between Evangelicals, Anglo Catholics and Liberals in the Church (who rather simplistically are equated with Scripture, Tradition and Reason). The trouble is, it simply isn't what Hooker said. In the relevant passage (and for what it's worth, I chose to do my dissertation on Hooker because he's much more commonly alluded to than actually read) what Hooker actually says is that *in questions of church polity and in the composition of liturgies* anything Scripture requires/forbids is mandatory/forbidden. If Scripture is silent, God expects humans to use reason (guided by Scripture) to determine what polity or liturgy is best suited to the present time and culture. If it's a toss up and there is more than one reasonable course of action, the Church should favour continuity with its past tradition (partly because continuity is beneficial in itself and partly because sometimes it is not clear to us what the function of a tradition or institution is until we get rid of it). I'm sure you can appreciate that that's a *very* different argument. It's really a methodology for handling adiaphora and an explanation for why the CofE has retained many of its pre reformation structures (especially Bishops). The three potential sources of authority are clearly hierarchialised in Hooker. If you'd like to learn more about Richard Hooker, I *highly* recommend Brad Littlejohn's book Richard Hooker: A Companion to his life and work. It's up to date, short, (under 250 pages), pitched well for the non specialist who is nonetheless familiar with Reformed theology, and is presently under $10 on Kindle. Grace and Peace! Ed
@theemperorfu176417 күн бұрын
Does Wesley count? I mean he did say "It's Methodist Time" and then started Methodizing all over
@redeemedzoomer605317 күн бұрын
he's way after the Reformers
@theemperorfu176417 күн бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 understandable
@estherruban467516 күн бұрын
That 100 year prophecy about Martin Luther is top notch 😅❤️. Happy Reformation Day ✝️🤞
@leonardopessanha512818 күн бұрын
Hey Brother, thank you for the videos. I am rediscovering the reformed faith because of you and yours suggestion. From Bruce Gore to The Mystical Presence of John Nevin and Turretini. From a Brasilian Presbyterian PS.: (What do you think about Systematics like Berkof? Never seen you talk about it and here in Brazil the first thing you do to know a little more is to read the Institutes of Calvin and the Systematic of Berkof (I've started but stopped sometime in the past))
@ChristianOpinions18 күн бұрын
Lowkey excited for this one ngl
@devinsaettel372517 күн бұрын
Very curious RV, what do you read for your research? I appreciate how well informed your videos are. Always wondered if you’re reading“church history” books or just The internet
@federativemapping197417 күн бұрын
A Hussite here. Nice vid. Just saw a vid from Voice of Reason about Huss and it's the most historically inaccurate vid i've seen
@unit239416 күн бұрын
Hus and the Hussites are amazing! Many Hussites merged into the Lutheran Church, which I am a part of.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
If you’re a Hussite. What are the beliefs of your church? Is it like a Baptist church ?
@unit239416 күн бұрын
@@MarkStein-t7d the Hussite issues were Communion under both kinds (receiving both the bread and wine in Communion), issues with corruption both morally and financially within the church, and something to do with papal authority if I remember correctly (they may have been Conciliarists but I can’t remember). They had a similar enough view of the sacraments for many of them to merge with Lutherans, notably the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The Moravian Church today stems from a mixture of Hussites and pietist Lutherans in the region of Moravia. They are not very strict theological but tend to affirm some mode of Christ’s presence in the Eucharist. They affirm various Protestant confessions such as the Augsburg Confession, Heidelberg Catechism, Thirty-Nine Articles, and others if I remember correctly. They would not be like a Baptist church because they affirm infant Baptism and Christ’s presence in the Supper. Does any of this answer your question? It may have been a disorganized response. The actual Hussite above could possibly do a better job explaining as well.
@MarkStein-t7d15 күн бұрын
@@unit2394 what were their views on purgatory, seeking the intercession of saints and predestination ?
@MarkStein-t7d15 күн бұрын
Historically, not after the reformation of course
@thatiowan358117 күн бұрын
Happy Reformation Day!
@anycyclopedia16 күн бұрын
St. Irenaeus who was all the way from the 2nd century talked about the Reformations like this: "He shall also judge those who give rise to schisms, who are destitute of the love of God, and who look to their own special advantage rather than to the unity of the Church; and who for trifling reasons, or any kind of reason which occurs to them, cut in pieces and divide the great and glorious body of Christ, and so far as in them lies, destroy it - men who prate of peace while they give rise to war, and do in truth strain out a gnat, but swallow a camel. (Matthew 23:24) For no reformation of so great importance can be effected by them, as will compensate for the mischief arising from their schism." - St. Irenaeus (Against Heresies IV, Chap 33.7)
@legodavid926016 күн бұрын
Has it occurred to you that the context Irenaeus was living in was probably very different than the context of the 15th century?
@anycyclopedia16 күн бұрын
@legodavid9260 "For no reformation of so great importance can be effected by them, as will compensate for the mischief arising from their schism." This is valid to the Protestant Reformation. Look what has happened to Christianity after the Reformation: transgender bishops, female priests, homosexual union blessings, no unity, you name it. Reformation did more harm to Christianity than good.
@Cslobasz200215 күн бұрын
I’ve just taken a look at the „Reformed Churches Map”, and I see with great happiness that my Hungarian Reformed church where I go to at Calvin Square in Hungary is on the map. Also, I noticed that there are many Hungarian Reformed churches in the US, especially in Ohio. God bless you all, God bless Redeemed Zoomer! I also have a question: Would you consider making a video about the Hugarian Reformed Church (in Hungary and in the US)?
@theggman11117 күн бұрын
Happy reformation from Poland
@bunk_foss17 күн бұрын
Unhappy reformation day, submit to the true Church.
@xxrandmlinksxxbruh241917 күн бұрын
Rebellion isn’t something to celebrate
@KnightFel17 күн бұрын
@@xxrandmlinksxxbruh2419it is when you’re rebelling against heresy.
@KnightFel17 күн бұрын
@@bunk_fosswe have - we submitted to Christ and His gospel 😉
@TSN-WVK0817 күн бұрын
Baptists forever!!!
@briangronberg650716 күн бұрын
Definitely one of your better videos. Thanks!
@Midnightlily2873617 күн бұрын
Heyyy!, can you tell me where you've learned this from? Been a Christian for my whole life, but I've really been wanting to learn more about this. ❤
@TheLordRichard16 күн бұрын
Jan Hus was given several chances to repent before they burned him, but he refused to go against his convictions. I’m absolutely not a Christian but I really respect Jan Hus for his bravery. Such an inspiration.
@legodavid926016 күн бұрын
If you look throughout Christian history, you'll realize he was far from the only one. Many Christians who had true, genuine faith in God had that kind of bravery.
@TheLordRichard16 күн бұрын
@@legodavid9260 I agree there has been many brave people throughout history both Christians and non-Christians.
@user-Strong.Trinitarian16 күн бұрын
What's the point of watching this video? Religion is not entertainment. Enjoy and stay on your Athiest pages, leave our religion alone and stop being obsessed about it if you dont want to associate with it.
@TheLordRichard16 күн бұрын
@@user-Strong.Trinitarian lmao, not an atheist but I definitely reject the Abrahamic God. Why are you scared if you know the truth? I will do what I want. And I find religion interesting. Also I pointed out where this video is wrong. So you should thank me.
@user-Strong.Trinitarian16 күн бұрын
@TheLordRichard I am not scared, i'm just irritated by the reprobate's comment. I'm scrolling enjoying the Christian niche and you stick out like a sore thumb. Religion is not entertainment, stop gawking and being awed about it focus on your "spirituality". Thanking you for what? For Not believing the one True God. I'm a Calvinist, instead I'll thank God for including me in his elect. 🥱🥱
@pibe507716 күн бұрын
Can you please make more videos about Theodore Beza? I always get flack from my Lutheran friends because of him😂
@ms250615 күн бұрын
So has "reformation" stopped or is it still underway? If its still underway then the new kind/type of churches do make sense.
@byFaithJustified13 күн бұрын
Redeemed love the map, brother. Missing an ACNA church in Rome, GA, and an LCMS church in Rome, GA.
@redeemedzoomer605313 күн бұрын
do those churches meet the Requirements? Including the BUILDILNG one? :)
@byFaithJustified13 күн бұрын
I believe so, brother. Holy Trinity Lutheran Church and St. Andrew's Anglican Church, both in Rome, Georgia.
@The_bombastic_baptist31A.D16 күн бұрын
Happy reformation day!
17 күн бұрын
I still think that when Jesus told "this is my flesh and this is my blood" he did not say "this is symbol of flesh and blood" So if I'd be protestant, I'd rather be Lutheran. But I'm not, and I'm catholic. Mainly because I disagree with iconoclasm, and I don't have any problem with papal supremacy.
@user-in1yw9ty5t16 күн бұрын
Literal ☝🏻
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
I sincerely don’t see the second part of the first commandment in any way if separated as a new commandment on its own allowing ANY kind of image. It’s either part of the first commandment and so it only forbids images of other gods. Or it’s a new commandment on its own and all the photos in any Protestants cellphone is making imagens of things on earth, water or air. I found people who said you can make 2D images but you can’t make 3D images. Hahahah
@user-in1yw9ty5t16 күн бұрын
I have Reformed Calvinist leaning so its literal here.
@bmyrick284617 күн бұрын
Great Video and Happy Reformation day! I do wish RZ would have talked about Balthasar Hubmair, an early Anabaptist theologian. What is very interesting and cool about him is that he was not as radical as most other Anabaptists. He held a high view of Baptism, Mary, and frequently quoted the church fathers. As a traditional Baptist who holds to the Baptists Confessions, I am very inspired by Balthasar, and wish more people knew of him.
@bonniegadsden909716 күн бұрын
I’m so thankful Sola Scriptura produces such uniformity 😂
@kanmuritokeiyaku14 күн бұрын
9:52 France out here catching strays
@alantysinger255213 күн бұрын
What methodology did you use for your church map? I see my church listed, which is PCA, but in my area which is South Texas, just at a glance. It looks like only about 25% of the churches made it.
@josephahner303116 күн бұрын
The moment "A Mighty Fortress is our God" started playing it was like the Lutheran version of that scene in a show where the MCs fight the final boss and the theme music starts playing.
@noahtylerpritchett268217 күн бұрын
It's unfortunate you didn't include Waldensians. Like Peter Waldo But I understand your exclusion of John Wesley, Charles Wesley, and George Whitefield. As they technically came long after the reformation
@DylanCampbell-tc9nm17 күн бұрын
Based video, this is one of my favorite formats you use. I'd love a video on St. Bernard of clairvoux, he seems like he has some proto protestant tendencies
@RileyMarks-vm7sp17 күн бұрын
What about the Council of Trent? I don’t see any reformers
@kyzaster912817 күн бұрын
@2:26 listening to the sweet sweet Gospel on my lunch break, thanks RZ
@redeemednetwork13 күн бұрын
Can you add Grace Lutheran Church and Christian School in Escondido California? This is a traditional Lutheran Church.
@joshuajohansen121017 күн бұрын
2:40 *He is the best exegete of Scripture
@Ockhamist216 күн бұрын
Zoomer, you kinda got the chronology wrong. Bullinger and Martin Bucer should have been after Zwingli. Bucer singlehandedly trained Calvin when Calvin was a nobody and technically a failed preacher. Check out Ryan Reeves series on Calvin. Your points about Calvin were right to a degree, but you gave him too much credit. He just adopted the beliefs of the Reformed before him. Even my message here is missing so much information. Please check out Ryan Reeves series for a more historically accurate view. Keep up the great work. God bless.
@LukeBowman0817 күн бұрын
I’m a Lutheran and all but that Jan Hus quote is just a total forgery.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
Where can I find reliable sources of this ?
@natereath496616 күн бұрын
@@MarkStein-t7d apparently, he said that people would come after him who would continue his work, but he never said specifically 100 years.
@MarkStein-t7d15 күн бұрын
@@natereath4966 i want to know who is the writer who wrote his last words
@litigioussociety424916 күн бұрын
10:55 Sorry "Bible Church," you didn't make the cut.
@ErickSilva-of8pv9 күн бұрын
I have the opinion that it is not based on any theological vision or anything like that, even more so because I don't understand anything about theology and that the hundreds of Christian theological visions and doctrines reflect the impossibility of human beings to fully understand God. The different views and doctrines are how their creators saw and understood an aspect of the Lord. Salutations from a brazilian fan👋🏻
@TheRoark17 күн бұрын
Hey you should make a new logo for the anabaptists I think to separate them from the later magesterial baptist movements. Don't want people to get confused and think that the baptist movements come from the anabaptists who they universally denounced!
@sorenstaecker-cd3mn16 күн бұрын
forgot the best part about John Knox. He had so much beef with Mary Queen of Scots that his hatred extended beyond just her and to all women. another famous publication of his is “The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women.” what a guy.
@pedroguimaraes609416 күн бұрын
He already mentioned that several times lol.
@EnochtheIntellectual16 күн бұрын
I sang a mighty fortress is our God in chapel at school (posted Thursday 10-31-2024 5:48 P.M.) I heard the song in the video at 8:05 a.m. to 8:08 p.m.
@ethanhutchison318013 күн бұрын
Great video zoomer. Do you believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary? The scripture explicitly states Mary knew her husband after giving birth to Jesus-what are your thoughts
@MacCoalieCoalson17 күн бұрын
One question about Anglicanism I haven't been able to find a solid answer for: Are the majority of Anglicans Calvinist/believers in predestination? The emphasis on pointing out the Calvinistic ideas of the founders of Anglicanism would seem to suggest that Calvinism in the current Anglican church is more variable. And a follow-up question, are there any significant differences between Anglicans and Episcopalians, or is their "split" mainly geographical?
@DrGero1517 күн бұрын
Episcopalians are a subset of Anglicanism, who are generally very liberal. Anglicanism does not support individualistic, Calvinist, predestination. The Homilies, Prayer Book, and even the Articles support Ecclesiastical Election. Cranmer was not a Calvinist, neither was Hooker. Hooker's most famous writing was attacking the Calvinist Puritans. Anglo-Calvinist/Reformed violate the Anglican Formularies just as much as Anglo-Papists/Catholics.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
not even the majority of Calvinists believe in double-predestination. They just like the idea that "God chose them" they never stopped to think about if God choose or not the others.
@blessedjedi16 күн бұрын
Informative video, However, Sir Thomas Cranmer’s personal views. Aren’t the standard by which the entire reformational Church of England held its beliefs. It is the final Versions of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer and 1571 39 Articles. Which were finalized after his death (Cranmer being heavily influential, but not the end all be all). We Anglicans believe it is the combined teachings of the pre(Whitby-Celtic)/peri/post reformation Anglican Bishops (including but not limited to St. Cranmer) who define our church. Had we wanted to be Calvinistic, we’d have kept the 42 articles (I can say the same for the RC’s and the 10 articles). Sir Hooker was also just moderately Reformed and heavily criticized both Roman Catholics and puritan Presbyterians. Our presence at Dort, isn’t to be confused with a subscription of its proceedings. Psuedo Arminian bishops like Lancelot Andrewes and John Overall (16/17th century) serve to show our church’s grace, when it comes to less essential views. I say this as neither an Anglo-Catholic nor Anglo-Reformed. We are reformed (not Calvinist Puritan) and catholic (not Roman Catholic). God bless you Zoomer and all, on this day of All Saints Eve and Reformation day!
@szezhicheng65815 күн бұрын
You missed Martin Chemnitz (1522-1586) and Jakob Andreae (1528-1590). They are second generation Lutheran German Reformers and were very important in the Lutheran Reformation as they finalized the production of the 1580 Lutheran Book of Concord that all Confessional Lutherans together with Scripture firmly hold to till this day.
@prey4kali16 күн бұрын
Maybe I’m a sissy, I cried about the end. For some reason “Protestant” history makes me very sad. Sad in the sense they weren’t intending to be divisive, and ended being burned at the stake over things that should have been discussed.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
If you look at the state of Protestant churches today, you see how right the Catholic Church was not to compromise with them. Most at that time couldn’t grasp the problem with going to a church that instead of eating Jesus flesh and blood in the Eucharist, it’s just a metaphor and they merely receive him in spirit “if” they believe. But now 500 years later where in many of those Protestant churches they barely believe that Jesus literally rose from the dead, more like rising from the dead is just a metaphor to do “social justice” then you can notice that the Catholic cleric was right not to compromise with such satanic beliefs
@aalleyne373816 күн бұрын
lovely, timely video!!
@noahtylerpritchett268217 күн бұрын
Im protestant and i hold more (not all) marian dogmas than most protestants. I bet Heinrich Bullinger and I would be friends.
@eiknarfp639118 күн бұрын
Happy Halloween! 🎃
@redeemedzoomer605318 күн бұрын
@@eiknarfp6391 reformation day*
@galladite492418 күн бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053 Vigil of All Saints* ;)
@fallenkingdom-zd8xh18 күн бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053Do you wanna go as Luce this year?
@Chance_Rice18 күн бұрын
Halloween before America was way different
@PauTheDeo17 күн бұрын
@@Chance_RiceUSA corporated it like always
@Origens_Shaper16 күн бұрын
Can you add All Saints Anglican Church in Calgary, AB to your map? We’re ACNA and we about to pop off.
@Nguyenzander18 күн бұрын
Surprised you included Zwingli lol
@SirMicahBroch16 күн бұрын
Well he is an incredibly important reformer for reformed theology.
@DruckerYTA18 күн бұрын
John Knox was hands down THE BEST
@redeemedzoomer605318 күн бұрын
Correct!
@Skibidivm_Latrinae17 күн бұрын
@@redeemedzoomer6053Prophet John Knox (PBUH)
@drjanitor374717 күн бұрын
Best heretic
@KnightFel17 күн бұрын
@@drjanitor3747papists obsessed with worshiping Mary still punching the air 😂 🤡
@JustinCage5617 күн бұрын
Happy Reformation Day, everyone!
@taufgesinntechristen397515 күн бұрын
You mentioned the Anabaptists but then quickly bypassed them (us). Why that? True, we are quite critical of the Protestant Reformation, but we are still an offspring of the Swiss Reformation and I think, we have something to say, too. Maybe you get acquainted with Conrad Grebel, Menno Simons or Jakob Hutter? You might need a new logo for the Anabaptists, though.
@calebevans369016 күн бұрын
Yo Zoomer, you mentioned in a video awhile back that there are approximately 12 Christain traditions and compared them to the 12 tribes of Israel. Can you elaborate on that? It was a really interesting point
@SuperStratosfear15 күн бұрын
A reminder: the reformers weren't burned at the stake so that we can view them or any man-made institution influenced by them as the source of sound doctrine. They gave their lives so that we could base our doctrine on scriptures only. Appealing to the theological beliefs of the reformers to validate your theology and denigrating the theology of evangelicals/Baptists misses the entire point of why the reformation was necessary in first place. If Baptist/evangelical theology is poor, then it would be because it is out of step with the scriptures, not with the opinions of Luther, Zwingli, Hus, Calvin etc.
@parttimememedealer707117 күн бұрын
So does it matter that even luther at the end of his life accepted that he couldn't reform the Catholic church and didn't feel sorrow for the religious and political conflicts he caused? Or is that irrelevant because the idea of a reformation itself was a just response to the papal expansion of power? And if that's the case, why didn't any of the reformers then reexamine Eastern orthodoxy if the Catholic Church was so in need of reform? If the Catholic Church was in disarray and in need of reformation since wycliffe, then when exactly did the Catholic church go astray? and if so, were the orthodox ahead of the curve for not compromise on the filioque?
@einzelwolf343717 күн бұрын
You can definitely draw parallels between the The Great Schism and the Reformation on account of the fact that both directly were caused by the Pope's claim to absolute authority. That being said, there are still many great differences between EO and Protestantism. The Protestants actually corresponded with the EO Patriarch, and the Patriarch eventually told them to stop contacting him over their differences of belief.
@MarkStein-t7d16 күн бұрын
@@einzelwolf3437 and they also had the Synod of Jerusalem in which they stated that Sola fide, Sola Scriptura and Double-predestination were wrong.
@Isfean15 күн бұрын
Great video, pointing out that sola scriptura is false, because without godly tradition everybody believes whatever they want. Also everyone falls pray to his "totally depraved" mind. 👍
@josephrogish165516 күн бұрын
This video can be summed up for those who want a TLDR: Reformation: *gets started* Also the Reformation: *immediately descends into mass schism*
@BernardinusDeMoor16 күн бұрын
These people were mostly not in conflicts with each other?
@Hedgehogz85615 күн бұрын
almost like the reformation wasn't the will of God
@BernardinusDeMoor15 күн бұрын
@@Hedgehogz856 Bad test, as it applies also to Christianity. See 1 Corinthians.
@Hedgehogz85615 күн бұрын
@@BernardinusDeMoor I am not reading an entire bible book over a KZbin comment
@Hedgehogz85615 күн бұрын
@@BernardinusDeMoor also there is one unified church, the Catholic Church and all others are schismatic heretics
@FissileThomist16 күн бұрын
When it comes to the eucharist, it sounds like all protestants (except mayber Lutherans) disagree with the aristo-thomistic metaphysics of its operation? It seems to me the theology just runs amuck as soon as you throw out Aristotelian metaphysics. (Pls correct me if I'm wrong)
@MusculusPulveri16 күн бұрын
Zoomer, wondering your sources for Bullingers Mariology. Thanks!
@EmV-si1eu14 күн бұрын
As a Protestant who believes in Sola Scriptura, I believe in the Theotokos or Mary the Mother of God or the "God bearer" as St. Augustine called her because it's pretty hard to refute this using Scripture since Elizabeth calls her "the mother of my Lord" in Luke 1:43. Plus, Jesus and God are used interchangeably throughout the NT making it Biblically impossible to divide the Hypostatic Union! Yeah, no Nestorian heresy here, which btw, is what the majority of new age modern-day Big Eva teaches! All that being said, it is impossible to argue for the perpetual virginity of Mary given multiple clear as day "The sky is blue, not green!" passages of Holy Scripture which are irrefutably to the contrary. Matthew 1:25 and did not know her TILL she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS. Mark 6:3 Is this not the carpenter, the Son of Mary, and brother of James, Joses, Judas, and Simon? And are not His sisters here with us?” So they were offended at Him Matthew 15:33 Is this not the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas? Galatians 1:19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James, the Lord’s brother. A denial of this for the sake of your church tradition or denominational views regardless of their historical longevity is just being willfully ignorant (aka STUPID ON PURPOSE)! Finally, where do people get the idea that God opened the eyes of Pig Henry? Maybe Cranmer but Henry? Nothing against Anglican brothers and sisters themselves. Their theology is pretty sound, but that doesn't change the fact that their denomination was founded on adultery and murder!
@lifematterspodcast10 күн бұрын
I’m pretty sure when Luther took his excommunication paper and burnt it in the street he was showing that he wanted to be kicked out
@waltergoraj523816 күн бұрын
Predestination is the foundational principle by which all other doctrines are to be understood. Why? Because the Bible is God's word to His people, and His people take God's word , in it's highest degree, spiritually. He is the one who opens our eyes to the truth. We don't open our own eyes, neither do we give ourselves a " new heart".
@PKSlippy16 күн бұрын
So the Anglican view of Communion via the 39 articles is probably more similarly to the Lutheran view
@lexvenirefactum18 күн бұрын
all saints reformers theologians pray for us. 🙏
@Chance_Rice18 күн бұрын
This makes no sense, alot of those revolutionaries were iconoclast
@user-in1yw9ty5t17 күн бұрын
Having a saints day could count as heterodox? Yes?!
@JustinPetrowski13 күн бұрын
RZ casually not taking sides on Methodists like we won’t notice 😂
@TheCptWilly16 күн бұрын
Bold of you to asume the church ever needs reforming.
@TheJoeschmoe77716 күн бұрын
Wym? That's not a bold claim at all. Protestants and Catholics alike all agree the church needs reforming. They just disagree on how to go about it.
@admiralvibe16 күн бұрын
Reform? Sure, there have been Catholic reformers to right the course of the Barque of St. Peter. Revolution? Degenerate, heretical.
@legodavid926016 күн бұрын
So if the Church becomes full of corruption and false teachings make their way into it, it doesn't need reforming? You may want to live in the fantasy world where "one true Church that never goes into error" exists, but no such church actually exists in reality.
@westerncentristrants52515 күн бұрын
How could you not put Peter Waldo? He founded the Waldensian church. It's the oldest Protestant denomination that still exists today.