Ukrainian vs Russian tanks

[@RedEffectChannel]

Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days! Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile 💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/RedEffectRUvsUA

[@lutin_mi06]

Your new profile pic is cool!

[@snehaashishgupta1254]

Not able to use ur code for CON

[@jaredyoung5353]

Russian tanks vs USA javelin

[@MDSR17455]

What is the difference between the T80U and the T80UM variant

[@kqckeforyou4433]

@@snehaashishgupta1254 dont work for me too

[@tetraxis3011]

"You can play as both Russia and Ukraine in Conflict of Nations" there could not be a worse time for a conflict of nations ad. xd

[@mey.tomhero4876]

Mans gotta make a living somehow, but yeah not great timing I agree

[@korzer]

It's best timing possible what are you talking about

[@tetraxis3011]

@@korzer The thing is, a lot of people are dying, many inocents and many conscripts, so the conflict of nations ad kind of takes the seriousness out of any video.

[@tetraxis3011]

@@korzer Albeit, it makes sense.

[@AliBaba-vw7mo]

@@tetraxis3011 unfortunately you cant buy food with feelings. Even if RedEffect feels bad for what is happening on Ukraine, he cant pay for rent or food with those feelings.

[@deaks25]

"The tank is old, very old, it came out in 1985..." I feel attacked xD

[@ACACARRR]

Me too.😂😂😂😂😂

[@dannya1854]

Don't feel too bad, even tanks that were made in the 2000s are considered "obsolete" by some metrics given how fast military technology is advancing.

[@hiigara2085]

The challenger 1 was in desert storm so I don't feel too bad as it's younger brother the challenger 2 has done well for my lifetime

[@gregmenego2200]

These old tanks can be put to good effect. This war does not have to be tank vs tank. Those old tanks deployed correctly will still make you be able to win a battle.

[@Sjw20006]

too right id take the ukrainian machines over the russian ones any day

[@tezwoacz]

@@Sjw20006 ukranian and russian "machines" are literally the same...so you make no sense Yes tanks can always serve as mobile artillery platforms even if they are bad as anti-tank so its mostly up to high command how well they will be utilised.

[@Sjw20006]

@@tezwoacz it’s a personal preference not based on the performance of said vehicles, I enjoy soviet era tanks and I like seeing what Ukraine does to keep them relevant I especially like bm oplot

[@tezwoacz]

@@Sjw20006 Iam not 100% sure but majority of russian tanks are also soviet era, and they are also "modernised", as far as I understand they are modernised in the same way as ukranian tanks are, which makes them almost identical. I might be wrong so if you know about some solid differnces then you`r welcome to share.

[@Sjw20006]

@@tezwoacz sorry I should of been more specific I like the ones built in the Ukraine (back when it was soviet territory) so t64 and t80 it’s a strange preference but I especially love the gas turbine t80 model

[@freenarnia6913]

Could you make a video on some of the lesser-known tanks from KMDB, such as the T-72-120, BMT-72, T-72AG, T-72MP, and their T-62 Upgrade?

[@notificationguys5128]

All of tank above have really limited quantity or even just a straight up prototype Still interesting for video purposes though

[@saucecomplex]

@@notificationguys5128 there is also the T-72E and the T-64E standard (export), they look on the surface high quality with a manageable price (at best)

[@Geniusinventor]

I hope Ukrainian and Russia don't start a ww3. I don't want to see any nuclear bombs

[@b3nl555]

@@Geniusinventor I want to see nuclear bomb 😎

[@Geniusinventor]

@@b3nl555 where do you live?

[@Kalashnikov413]

It's here, everyone. The unfortunate war.

[@ale69420]

This video made me realize how many more tanks Gaijin can add to the russian tech tree 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@scandited2763]

+ add Ukrainian sub-tree or smth

[@RhuBin02]

@@scandited2763*if russia captures Ukraine they'll add after that*

[@scandited2763]

@@RhuBin02 Bruh I hope no because I live 80 km far from ruskies. I dont play WT anyway

[@RhuBin02]

@@scandited2763 ah damn,but gotta say i still dont get the point of this "potential war" that may happen. they are kinda same people.maybe the ussr wasnt that bad.except its communist government maybe

[@RhuBin02]

@@scandited2763 stay safe brother,hope pootin calms down and sort things out nicely

[@ArielK-a]

8:29 based dog, even in the threat of a tank he still attacks

[@joelrivera4874]

Fucking savage dog!

[@spookyweeb5563]

just like the eastern front!

[@spookyweeb5563]

@Kotomine Berndrewd she does bear a resemblance to konpaku.

[@patrickcronin6829]

What really matters now is how the Russian tanks do against javelin missiles...

[@talltroll7092]

Not great, apparently. Ukraine is claiming ~200 tank kills, and while it is impossible to verify that, and noone has said anything about Ukrainian losses, the relatively slow progress of the Russians in the first 5 days at the very least does show that the Russians have not smashed the Ukrainian army the way the paper stats suggested they could

[@carwyngriffiths]

Not well at all lmfao. Not that they’re needed, the Russians do a perfectly good job of abandoning them without any ‘help’ from the Ukrainians.

[@brutal_slav4257]

@@talltroll7092 Russia doesn’t use artillery and doesn’t go full in. This is more a military operation than war. Otherwise if it was war, Russia would just fully turn Ukraine to ash

[@Tratios]

@@brutal_slav4257 Not sure that is true anymore.. Russia has already started going full artillery; so far it means either THEY ARE ATTACKING CIVILIANS or they have no precision fires via artillery or missile system. They seem to have not done maintenance on their equipment or training of their forces or put any effort into logistics so they look like North Korea but with nukes.

[@Carlene.loves.colours]

@@brutal_slav4257 I want to attribute that to russian soldiers being decent human beings that did not want to commit warcrimes against people they rightly call their brothers and sisters. With the war getting ever more bloody and losses mounting on each side (not to mention the pressure probably put on officers by the Kremlin), we can see this decency erroding very quickly the last couple of days and moving towards what the world is already used to from previous wars like Chechnya. Also to be completelly frank with you, the russian army did not manage to use their long range firepower effectivelly against military targets in the first days of invasion to even knock out military command/logisitcs and airfields. This was not holding back on firepower, this was a complete tactical failure they now try to make up for with becoming ever more violent, maybe even force the rest of the world to react more directly in an attempt to escalate the situation further.

[@ravenmusic6392]

Most of Ukraine’s problems stem from its complete lack of numbers in modern tanks. They have like 150 T-64BM’s which is pretty meh, it’s only real advantage against the B3 in the satnav. The rest are all T-64BV updates which have terrible protection and some obsolete T-72AV and T-80BV tanks. Not saying Russia’s fleet is the best in the world, the B3’s are also quite meh, but they’re way ahead of Ukraine’s in numbers and technology

[@ser43_OLDC]

The Russians don't need the T90A and T90M against Ukraine

[@OzzyOstfront]

Germany recently delivered 5000 helmets.relax

[@KalFulsom]

The Ukrainian problem is Putin. He is the belligerent neighbor threatening to attack.

[@Keckegenkai]

@@OzzyOstfront they asked for these helmets lmao

[@mattiasdahlstrom2024]

@@KalFulsom the Ukrainian problem is Northstream. US wants to stop trade between Europe and Russia

[@georgeklemens7577]

The Russians also have Cornet ATGM’s so those might play a big role

[@Lancasterlaw1175]

Huh, despite reading 'Kornet' hundreds of times this is the first time I have realized it means comet.

[@reneegiese6315]

Too few, too late. Like always.

[@nemanja162]

@@reneegiese6315 russians have thousands of kornet missiles.... and tens of thousands of other atgms.

[@ShadowDDB1]

ATGM's are better for defensive warfare. ambushing Tank formations from concealed positions. So Ukrainian ATGMS could wreck a large portion of Russia's armor if employed correctly. and be much more effective then Russian AT teams who will have to move forwards with the tanks and expose themselfs to enemy fire and observation.

[@PlayUPUA]

Kornets? Don't forget, that Ukraine has more than 700 ATGM's like (Stugna-P, Skif and Corsar). 377 - FGM- 148 jevelins(2nd in the World after USA), 2200 NLAW,(and old Soviet era 800 "Fagots", 212 Konkurs). Russia have only 750 cornet ATGMS around all of Russia(and old Soviet era 1000 "Fagots", 143 "Konkurs" ).

[@pilotmanpaul]

Well... this aged nicely.

[@unknowncommenter6698]

Unlike pro-ukrainian comments, they aged like milk.

[@critterjon4061]

You have no idea

[@MrPickledede]

​@@critterjon4061 lol

[@TheTryingDutchman]

5:00 A T64 with thermals. Now that i know those exist, i want one in War Thunder lol.

[@chanin2469]

Imo it should be at 9.7 after the T-64B

[@lewismiller870]

@@chanin2469 Nah bruh, its composite armor so bs to be that high. Facing 10.7 and 10.3, it will get R word xd

[@teremin]

Did anyone else notice the dog chasing that tank at 8:30? Lol

[@gruxtertv6005]

Speaking about Ukrainian tanks, could you make a video about Azovets as you mentioned in the "Ukrainian Armata-like tanks"? I've been quite fascinated by it and such a video would be greatly appreciated.

[@Militarna_Koala]

They exist only on the very first stage of prototypes(or even just like pictures), so there is nothing to talk about.

[@789know]

it exists only as a drawing, so probably difficult to make a video about it

[@vindicare9636]

Azovets has been taken away by the Azov regiment in 2018 and they destroyed its factory over some shady deals

[@JMiskovsky]

@@vindicare9636 lol it takes real brilliance to destroy tank plant in times of conflict.

[@vindicare9636]

@@JMiskovsky They also burned down the engine and gearbox of the prototype :)

[@15six37]

You make amazing, very accurate and informational videos. Keep up the great work!

[@firebirdgaming3595]

Could you make a video also comparing Ukrainian and Russian tanks against their susceptibility to each other's AT weapons and IFVs? Both sides have decently large numbers of man-portable and static AT weapons, which may prove even more consequential than tanks in an armored all-out conflict. It would be interesting to see how each side's respective tanks hold up to the infantry threat. PS. Both sides also seem to field large numbers of BMP-2s and 3s, which seem to be armed with weapons that (at least on a good day) could pose a serious threat to each other's armored forces. Could you cover those in the sequel video to this one also?

[@scandited2763]

Ukraine has its own IFVs as well (BTR-3, BTR-4) and BMP-1s armed with module “Spys” (Spear)

[@Max_Da_G]

@Haitham Ali Only in permissive environment where there is no potent and modern electronic warfare. Russians had shown in Syria just how easily they can make smaller drones drop out of the sky, while mobile short-range SPAAGMs and mobile SAMs take the larger ones out.

[@captainbutplak4344]

@@Max_Da_G electronic warfare? They dont even encrypt their comms!

[@meisterproper8304]

@ابو عمر الجبوري drones haven't seen that much use in Ukraine. Very effective but not nearly as devastating as in Naghorno-Karabakh.

[@unknowncommenter6698]

Ukraine doesn't have BMP-3, though. They have BTR-3 and BTR-4.

[@aaronpaul9188]

A ukranian massed tank attack is going to be pulverized by russian artillery and airpower anyway so tank on tank combat is probably going to be rare. Especially since ukraine knows it'd own difficulties. With that in mind, I want to hear your analysis of the western atgms being supplied to ukraine and especially their effectiveness against the most common russian tanka deployed. I want to know if they can make a major difference on the tactical level.

[@combatmuffin3192]

If Nato gets involved I think tank on tank combat will be more likely. Although if Nato does get involved Russian tanks maybe the ones get destroyed by air power. Edit: Damn you guys seem very insecure about my comment.

[@Slavkovic_Predrag]

@@combatmuffin3192 Russia has more air defense systems than rest of earth combined so good luck with that.

[@combatmuffin3192]

@@Slavkovic_Predrag There air defense cant detect US 5th gen aircraft.

[@mrmacias4217]

@@Slavkovic_Predrag exactly

[@KalFulsom]

The Ukrainians are not the ones threatening to attack Russia. So your point is mute.

[@nathanwong5644]

Basically battle rating 9.7/9.3 tanks versus BR11.0+ tanks in gaijin logic

[@PAcifisti]

You forget that what Russia Claims it equipment do and protect against is different from what it actually does. The old ammo still wrecks the "new" tanks just fine. People for some reason just outright believe the Russian propaganda at face value, even if many of them know how much they lie.

[@ryandoubleu.]

We all ignored Ukraines secret weapon at the start. Mud, Farmers, and their tractors.

[@talon9639]

comedy: 100

[@jasestrong]

Excellent job on this video. I am a prior soldier and this was very informative. Keep up the good work.

[@peterfeeney721]

VERY much looking forward to the rest of the fleet!

[@junak8823]

Hi Red Effect I liked video and I'm looking forward to part no2. Also since I heard that Czech Republic and Slovak Republic are offerd with Polish IFV Borsuk I want to ask if you could do video about this vehicle?

[@tta2218]

Video about slovakian and czech t72m4 and m2 moderna,scarab and bmps would be good too

[@Cptnbond]

British BAE Systems has confirmed its bid submission, together with the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration, for the CV90 in response to the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic’s acquisition of 152 new Infantry Fighting Vehicles.

[@davidflorek2165]

@@CptnbondYeah, we tried to modernise our BMPs , but instead the Ministry gave up when the results wasnt as they hoped for.

[@hendi1571]

@@tta2218 T-72M4 is quite bad as the tanks were composed of T-72M1 hulls and T-72M turrets except for one unit which was made out of T-72M1 hull and turret

[@tta2218]

@@hendi1571 i know we got sh*t but i want to see video about them

[@janpospisil3107]

Can you please make a video on T-72M4CZ? Even just a quick overwiew, if it’s still up for the task, or if it should be replaced soon. Greetings form Czech Republic!

[@tobilikebacon]

lol imagine if a t90m meets a ukranian t-64 bv XD

[@mrt53]

If it shot first and hit it would win, as is the case in almost every tank engagement

[@tobilikebacon]

@@mrt53 Well i doubt the t 64 would be able to penetrate the t90m frontally And on top of that the t90m has modern thermals where as the t64 bv doesn’t even have any

[@RussianSkyfox13]

Yeeeah)

[@RussianSkyfox13]

I live in Russia and in 2021 we get 67 t90m

[@Militarna_Koala]

I'll tell you a "little secret", in order to disable the tank, it is not necessary to pierce its armor. After one high-explosive projectile, the tank loses all its optics and becomes incapable of combat. + on the side, all modern tanks are poorly protected. Therefore, everything will depend on the tactical situation. In addition, tank duels are more of an exception than a normal situation.

[@tomjones2860]

The video makes the mistake of assuming a Tank vs Tank war. Makes sense since the strategy has always been that the best tool to take out a tank is a better tank. Turns out that is no longer the case. The best tool to take out a tank is a foot soldier with a shoulder mounted Javelin or NLAW with 60 minutes of training. The Russians have demonstrated that a tank without integrated air support and infantry protection is a sitting duck.

[@timurlane4004]

And it seems the Russians realised that. British sniper who served in Ukraine and returned said in a interview that they simply cant use the Javelin and NLAW. Because of the distance of the tank from the ATGM and supporting infantry. But they are still taking out Russian tanks but not in the scale during the earlier part of the war

[@rael5469]

Wow, this really made my day, my week, my month. Perfect subject and perfect timing.

[@somewierdoonline2402]

Honestly I'm not sure if this tank comparison aged too well since most Russian tanks so far in the Ukraine-Russian war have probably been taken out mostly by either aircraft or some kind of launcher but I'm not confident in this statement so feel free to tell me what's going on it

[@AbokaseeRed]

It looks like the Brazilian style economic model of Russia could not support the installation of the systems he mentions. To boot, the Russians in general have dreadful morale, even the Chechens by now. Those based in Russia receiving conscription notices are intending to surrender on first contact wih Ukrainian uniform. Red Effect isn't actively lying, it just turns out those HarkKill/SoftKill systems Russia claims to have are practically vapourware

[@somewierdoonline2402]

@@AbokaseeRed oh I didn't mean to imply he was lying I just thought the comparison of tanks was a bit useless

[@pz_faust6866]

@@somewierdoonline2402 did he mention Chechen? Youre talkingvabout Ukraine and he reply with chechen? Dont you think its out of context? Oh yea and there are 2 chechen wars, 1 with boris yeltsin and later Putin. Im sure he havent done his hw so im just gonna tell you he was refering Russia during 1st Chechen war which was a massacare and disaster due to lack of coordinations, zero experience, and fully unprepared. It was the other wau around during the 2nd Chechen war under Vladimir Putin. They learn their mistakes and improvise which resulted to the end of chechen war later on. So what it has to do with Ukraine and Russia conflict today? Zero relation.

[@diabolicwave7238]

@@pz_faust6866 There are Chechen troops fighting for Russia. He's stating they have terrible morale by now. Not sure that's right.

[@kamraam1464]

Red Effect loves to eat up whatever propaganda he sees on reddit. Unfortunately for him, the war in Ukraine is proving that Russian armor/tactics are absolutely garbage lol

[@importantname]

i have learnt that free to play games are the most expensive games to play if you ever want to win.

[@Fred_the_1996]

ahem war thunder

[@muhdhazmanhasnizan8596]

Still waiting about PT-91 and PT-91M, don’t you think it’s quite rare tank?

[@Ariel117-p2k]

i agree, but those are two different tanks very different...The (M) Had everything changed except for the ERA, but it's still a T-72 base tank

[@MiSt3300]

Isn't it the Polish modified version based on the T72 chassis?

[@muhdhazmanhasnizan8596]

@@Ariel117-p2k yes with french made fcs... new engine and more... it’s more interesting when us Malaysia using it right now, and being compared to our neighbor Thailand which using BM Oplot...

[@saltyshackles5227]

Defenders choice/advantage isn't really discussed here. A hidden & well positioned older tank can take out a newer, unspecting attacking MBT. Training, competence and positioning are more important than latest equipment. A good soldier is a good soldier. Ukraine MBTs may be quite outdated but when defending and concealed you have a huge advantage (if hidden and manage to gain element of surprise).

[@geronimo5537]

Worked well for iraq's armor against america. Really with any sky advantage on a battlefield even with hand held drones. There is a far higher chance of being spotted and killed. Right now small drones are picking out camoflagued tanks in the forest. So supior concealibility isnt always the deciding factor anymore. And everything needs tracks in the ground. Follow the tracks to the tank and tada.

[@Zarathustra-H-]

I'd be interested in OP's take on the upgraded T64BM "Bulat" variety that Ukraine supposedly has ~130 of rather than the T-64BV.

[@TheGranicd]

There will be minimal tank to tank engagements if it happens. Its mostly artillery/ATGM fight there.

[@kromsukit]

ages well

[@timo25ification]

Friendly fire incidents for both sides going to go through the roof *insert doppelganger spiderman meme*

[@hectorrodriguez2686]

I cannot believe how many different types of tanks. The maintenance.

[@AndyBorowski]

definitely an interesting comparison. the war between russia and ukraine has been going on for more than two weeks. during this time the Russians lost more than 200 tanks, half of which were simply abandoned. what's the point of a good tank if it's driven by an unmotivated and poorly trained crew? just a mountain of iron.

[@donkthedankee8595]

Steel actually, if it were iron then it would collapse in on itself

[@Brian-qj4kk]

fake claim by ukraine🤣

[@ericharrison7518]

@@Brian-qj4kk Almost 600 Russian tanks have been visually confirmed to be destroyed, knocked out, or abandoned. Potentially, they were wrong on 200 knocked out in the first few weeks, but doubtful, considering the first four weeks seems to be when Russia took the majority of their losses, during the failed offensives at Kyiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Mylokaiv, and their first failed pushes against the entrenched UA forces in the Donbass. There's always the possibility that they lost more during the second failed offensive into the Donbass but it's doubtful, since they had far smaller numbers of tanks in their latest offensive.

[@rexgamer8201]

@Kotomine Berndrewd oryx

[@chaitanyachauhan91]

Can you please work on a video which could explain heavy armored losses of Russia in current conflict. Much appreciated. Would be eagerly waiting for your new content. 👍

[@projectnemesi5950]

There are no heavy armorer losses in russia. Russia is flattening ukraine. They are currently bombing bases on the ukraine-polish border. Mercenary fighters are telling people not to join and the fight and to go home, that ukraine is giving out "shit ak's" and that "their bodies wont be recovered from the frontlines".

[@Mynanaentangas]

@@projectnemesi5950 there are heavy loses both from infantry and armored divisions, Russia should leave Ukraine before is too late

[@projectnemesi5950]

@@Mynanaentangas Source?

[@memememes7525]

@@Mynanaentangas nah ukraine is the one who should leave their country

[@Mynanaentangas]

@@projectnemesi5950 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKiTc6acj6xknJo

[@Rohrkrepierer]

St. Javelin called, the N-Laws are coming over )))

[@Andrew_Sword]

i think you forgot to mention that the Ukrainian armor has a huge edge over russian armor. its crewed by ukrainians, Russian ap cant get through the huge balls of steel these guys have

[@LyonPercival]

he wont say that he has pro-russian bias hidden theme

[@Mech-Badger-Man]

Your missing the Russian tanks actually need crew in them to shot XD

[@richardpan4252]

Media also had portrayed a well-disciplined Afghan national army🤔

[@deadbrothers5356]

you talk as if russians are cowards

[@the_burger]

Clown

[@abhilashyadav2274]

Just send an Arjun tank and there would be peace .

[@cosmin_budda]

xD

[@jPlanerv2]

Both armies would laugh to death

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@jPlanerv2 Arjun tank then start Rick-rolling?

[@TimeJedi]

T-72B3M in the kontakt-5 block, the filler was replaced with the filler he "relict". Yes, this is not the most optimal solution, but it is more effective than "Contact-5"

[@AlexanderK9519]

Source ?

[@TimeJedi]

@@AlexanderK9519 Телеграмм. За два года минимум три видео попадалось с подтверждением. Понятно что скорее всего это уже результат работы рембатов на местах, но факт имеет место быть.

[@grandayatollah5655]

Yo redeffect, did you see the new Russian BMMP Amphibious Assault Vehicle? May I ask if you're doing a video on it in the future? Also as always, can you update your Iranian tanks video lol

[@bbrenddon]

I could imagine a lot of friendly fire incidents happening because they wouldn’t be able to tell their Allie’s from enemies

[@soldiersandstuff9607]

Ukraine paints (or painted) their tanks with a white stripe down their tanks to avoid FF.

[@southerneastern2527]

russians are painting "Z"s on their tanks (note that there is no "Z" in the cyrillic alphabet)

[@marcuseliasson5095]

@@southerneastern2527 No Z in the cyrillic alphabet????? we use "З" as Z, in Serbian atleast

[@southerneastern2527]

@@marcuseliasson5095 I’m not talking about the “Z” sound. I’m talking about the Z letter.

[@IronWarhorsesFun]

I just watched a video of a random Ukranian having a perfectly civilized conversation with a Russian T-72 that was "out of fuel". Not sure if it really was or if the crew were just being coy.

[@délvidéky]

The dog chasing the tank hahahaha

[@JarOfDirt.]

I would love another video where you compare the other tanks as well

[@nootnoot7787]

Seeing notf of red effects video is full of joy. Thank you for your vids man

[@Menddoxs]

Russia: sents all their tank variants up to T-90 Ukraine: Javelin, Panzerfaust 3, M72, NLAW: allow us to introduce ourselves And Ukraine has captured a lot of Russian Tanks too... Like the T-90s

[@xxch1coriaxx]

Guess you also believe in the Ghost of Kiev

[@Menddoxs]

@@xxch1coriaxx there are many ghosts of Kyiv

[@anfrale4657]

@@xxch1coriaxx dont need to believe when theres literal video evidence of fail russians abandoning their tanks and hero Ukrainians turning them against their former masters.

[@anselmdanker9519]

Thanks looking forward to the next part ,great work as always.

[@bkd97]

well this aged bad

[@MRrealmadridRaul]

He should have focused on how well Russian tanks can deal with other Russian tanks because Ukraine has captured more Russian tanks than they've lost so far.

[@MobinBrown]

It didnt. This video just gives a glimpse of what a tank vs tank battle would look like on paper. Current reports from the fog of war show the Ukrainians arent using their tanks against the Russian tanks.

[@misterputin8898]

@@MobinBrown Yeah, why you would use your tanks to destroy other tanks while having a Javelin atgm???

[@PAcifisti]

Video that aged like fine milk given how the ancient ammo that had no chance of dealing with Russia's "modern" stuff still wrecks it.

[@Xilley1]

You do know that we almost never see tank on tank battles in Ukraine right? nearly all tanks being taken out are from ATGMs, artillery, drones, mines...almost never another tank.

[@Todd_357]

Too long without a upload dude, keep it coming! 👍 Btw Russia needs to sort out its naming game T72BV, BVM, U, M, MS, SM lol

[@Eire_Aontaithe]

America and their M1's can be confusing too

[@dotnask0001]

If you know what those letters mean its actaully very well done compared to m1

[@あかみ-z6n]

At least it's not like what the Serbians have.

[@dotnask0001]

@@あかみ-z6n Ah yes M84

[@MisteriosGloriosos922]

*Great video! Thanks for sharing!*

[@appsstore11]

God I'm watching this as those tanks battle it out now,scary times..

[@liammarra4003]

Nooo, exciting times!

[@herotime3726]

He talks like war consists of lining up opposing tanks and just yelling "open fire" and thats it.

[@ionutbalta6607]

Hes comparing the tanks not the army

[@N0noy1989]

@@ionutbalta6607 weirdly, there's barely any tank vs tank battles in Ukraine. I don't even think Ukraine fielded their tanks. And they have a lot too. They must be saving them up. Anyway, seems like the age of tanks has gone. javelins are just way better to destroy armor.

[@ionutbalta6607]

@@N0noy1989 Not surprising.Ukraine stands no chance in an open field battle against Russia.As motivatie as they are their MBT are no match for current Russian tanks. Their T-64B is outclassed by tanks like T72B3 not to talk about T90 or T80. Its smart of them to use hit and run tactics on the Russian forces. Also i dont think the Tanks are obsolete now just because Javelins exist they are still a potent weapon on the battlefield perfect for breakthrough operations. What really stopped the Russian military is their own logistics. An army that has its doctrine based on mass assault is no use when their own logistical line gets stuck tens of kilometres away from the lines from the lack of fuel.

[@TheBucketSkill]

@@N0noy1989 Not weirdly... we know that by far the vast majority of tank kills EVEN IN WW2 resulted from anti-tank weapons. That stats say so, but the little boy in all of us loves tank vs tank lol. So we go on and on about them at length for fun.

[@ole-martinbroz8590]

Please do the Antitank video, what effect does all of the stuff uk and usa sent matter, what can they kill ?

[@notafrog2040]

8:25 the dogs like “can we go for a walk?”

[@smortstonk4591]

Well you be discussing the T-14 Armata? I don't think that it'll see combat but it'll be cool to hear you compare it to Ukrainian tanks.

[@vladimirvojtaml]

It might get deployed you can never know for certain. But compared to UA tanks T-14 would still dominate them in tank on tank combat. It's supposed to have 12 shots per minute and APFSDS called Vacuum-1 and 2 which should have extremely good properties. Then the hardkill APS and Malachit ERA. It's a beast for sure.

[@TheAGeNt2212]

The T-72b3 2016 uses explosive elements 4C23 as part of the Kontakt-5, which are standard equipment for relicts. they are more sensitive to modern NATO shells

[@sovietbottle-cap1649]

I know you probably won't read this but can you do a video about the m60a3vtts vs the t72ag i think their pretty unique in some ways

[@DarkRendition]

YES! THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS VIDEO!!!

[@noobepro_7146]

If they run out modern tank, they will use modernized KV-2, T-10, or even BT or T-34 series lol

[@Kalashnikov413]

KV-2 with it's 152 mm nuclear launcher T-10 with it's....... idk what's special about them BT with it's ridiculous speed T-34 with it's stalinium armor

[@あかみ-z6n]

No T-10s but I imagine DPR would like to have their IS-3 back

[@alexdetrojan4534]

Nice analysis. Have you done any videos on MANPADS vs Russian tanks? I'm thinking the Javelin and Piorin.

[@stilpa1]

Manpads are not for tanks but for aircraft

[@Altair885]

It's kinda missing the point, the Ukrainians aren't fighting tank on tank battles, they've opted for an urban setting to take on the Russians, in these circumstances large numbers of tanks aren't particularly useful, they're also extremely vulnerable in this environment. As we've seen its quite easy for the Ukrainians to setup an ambush and destroy an entire column of armoured vehicles just with man portable anti tank weapons. The conflict in Syria should have been a good example for the Russians of what would happen if you try to push tanks through towns and cities when modern anti tank weapons are present.

[@spookyweeb5563]

the point of the video though was a comparison of the tanks, not which side would win in a war. this video is not looking at the bigger picture. i completely agree on all the points you made past "It's kinda missing the point,".

[@messyer]

Also, russian logistics is breaking down, thus many tanks are being abandoned by their crews. In fact, not only tanks but all sorts of military equipment.

[@venzzz1370]

Well that explains why I haven't seen footage of tank battles since the beginning of the invasion or idk, maybe none yet

[@nicholasconder4703]

Considering we have not seen much of the Ukrainian tanks, it makes me wonder if the Ukrainians are saving their armor for counterattacks, or hoping the Russians become overextended and vulnerable to an armoured breakthrough or encirclement.

[@Altair885]

@@nicholasconder4703 I suspect that they don't really have much in the way of tanks now after the airstrikes, but those that are left will have been deployed in defensive positions, most likely dug in so they're hull down near certain strategic areas. Russia is pretty much dominating the airspace so armour is extremely vulnerable if exposed, I image any that still survive will be not moving much & well hidden by now!

[@niffy99]

Well looks like the javelin can kill en all

[@sn0lder]

it would be cool if you made an overall analysis of ground to ground battle, with AT weapons and infantry and all

[@cascadianrangers728]

Fighting even a base model t64 is pretty terrafying if all you have is a rifle and grenades

[@ahmadmahairi8115]

It would be helpfull to write the tank name or show a table or smthg coz it was really hard to keep track with all model nimbers and letters then the specs 😅

[@skrajina8037]

Odlican video brate!

[@Diversus100]

Javelines and NLAWS entered the chat.

[@frankmccann29]

Blunt, succinct and concise. No BS thanks.

[@РайанКупер-э4о]

Remember there are VKS and artillery. Most of ukrainian tanks wouldn't live long enough to face russian tanks.

[@askme5805]

BUlshit, VKS and artillery has both sides. Vlado Puta has small male/dick complex. Even my grandma from Dnipro is taller.

[@notalexzander2]

@Bart Dr biggest threats to any tanks on either side would be ATGMs.

[@hoobsug]

@@askme5805 cope + ratio

[@РайанКупер-э4о]

@@askme5805, compared to Russia Ukraine have no artillery. And remember that attacking side have advantage in that case. I can't imagine attacking Ukraine. Plus Russia have extensive reconnaissance network. And Russia can strike into any point of Ukraine from any direction with rockets. So any concentration of ukrainian forces and any strategic military object could be illuminated in the first hour.

[@PlayUPUA]

@@РайанКупер-э4о illuminated in the first hour? By the 140 of iscander rockets? Or by 300 airplanes, that deployed around ukrainian border.) Your imagination is not real.)

[@Zarathustra-H-]

Also worth mentioning. The capability of the equipment is only one factor of the equation. In this conflict it is increasingly looking like Russian equipment is poorly maintained, manned by poorly trained conscripts, and commanded by generals who lack a grasp on good strategy, and are unable to deal with logistics. As Omar Bradley once said, "Amateurs talk about Strategy. Professionals talk about logistics". With stories of T-90's being abandoned after they failed to function in their poorly maintained states, with logistics supply chains unable to properly supply them, and Russian conscripts barely knowing how to use their equipment, I think this comparison is not very useful.

[@thinnedpaints6503]

@@taobaoexpert123 Then why are all the Russian POW's saying the same thing? They don't want to be there, and they're barely trained more often than not.

[@Brando7867-j1u]

@@taobaoexpert123 those are conscript soldiers that have never had any experience in warfare and were thrown in machine's that have never been serviced in decade's.

[@ionutbalta6607]

@@taobaoexpert123 Chinese military is extremely corrupt.You ca buy a rank in the military if you pay enough money.

[@ionutbalta6607]

@@taobaoexpert123 Just google it online.Id put links here but it will likely report as spam by youtube.

[@WestValleyTransparency]

Now, the world knows how vulnerable the T-80's and T-90's are to infantry🇺🇦

[@ivanivanovitchivanovsky7123]

I mean, we’ve always known how vulnerable tanks are to infantry, even in WW2. It’s just this time, clowns are finally realising that tanks aren’t invincible.

[@kennethconnors5316]

Excellent evaluation

[@icysaracen3054]

Israel pretty much reverse engineering Ukraine soviet armor and aircrafts

[@Admin-gm3lc]

You mean stole?

[@icysaracen3054]

@@Admin-gm3lc what do you mean? They are adding in Israeli avionics and control panels inside Ukraine aging soviet weapons. They did the same for Georgia and India

[@hendi1571]

@@icysaracen3054 which?

[@Admin-gm3lc]

@@icysaracen3054 I thought you meant Israel copied it, like it did with Galil. But if it helps Ukraine, then well, seems that Bandera guy should be hero of Israel now

[@kostasdinos8982]

Could you make a video on tractors?

[@lordofdarkdudes]

Do Russian tanks vs Ukrainian tractors

[@generalmarkmilleyisbenedic8895]

RIP to that crazy slav doggo who likes chasing after tanks lol

[@grandayatollah5655]

Nozh ERA apparently isn't that good, or at least doesn't work how it claims. There's a good report into it

[@asjash3411]

whoes report? from russians?

[@grandayatollah5655]

@@asjash3411 no, an independent dude. I think he was Indian.

[@asjash3411]

@@grandayatollah5655 really, how indians could know, was it based on ground tests like in ukraine engeneers did?

[@grandayatollah5655]

@@asjash3411 no they did an analysis, if you have Twitter or discord or something like that I could message you

[@asjash3411]

@@grandayatollah5655 type me link for proof

[@solid_fire9388]

veri good video Red !

[@jeffstone7912]

You’re making a quantitative assessment of this war The wildcard is the qualitative assessment. The Ukrainians seem to be better soldiers that are motivated. They seem to have better command and control. But that is not the subject of your video.

[@Necromancer_88]

Arty dont care about your motivation

[@mackjsm7105]

My Fav Tank Guy!! TY

[@eslSlightz]

I am confused by all the numbers and letters 😵‍💫

[@Mirpurmad]

T64B might form second line of defence and provide support to artillery

[@soulstealer930]

Skip 0:20 - 1:08

[@grandayatollah5655]

Nah bro deserves the ad revenue

[@rn-zu5ld]

@@grandayatollah5655 ... it isn't a youtube add so he only gets money if you click the link

[@grandayatollah5655]

@@rn-zu5ld viewer time

[@jamesocker5235]

Question comes down to tactics and crews, proper use of those gives real upper hand.

[@2001chacha]

Russian tanks no match for Javelins. Hundreds already gone up in flames like Roman candles, turrets blown clear off, etc RIP for all the Russian tank crews inside.

[@ju8_hiugo]

where talking about tanks, not anti-tank missiles.

[@asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791]

We're up to almost 2000 visually confirmed Russian tank losses, lol. The real number of losses is probably even higher.

[@TheMaltesefalcon204]

It isn't a Slavic tank video unless some random dog is running around and the boys see riding on the turret.

[@zhufortheimpaler4041]

16.5Hp/t on T64b is not good.... Or how Brits would say it: enormous and fantastic Hp/t Ratio. (Cr2 with Megatron barely scratches 16Hp/t from below, Cr3 will be more like 15.5Hp/t)

[@talltroll7092]

That is partially because we tend to design more for torque than raw top speed. A good top speed certainly has advantages, but it's pretty rare that a tank either can or wants to go that fast for any extended period of time. Being able to more quickly outrun your logistic tail and support units is not the massive advantage that it may appear on paper

[@zhufortheimpaler4041]

@@talltroll7092 yeah.... in that respect.... Challenger 2 has one of the lowest if not the lowest torque of western MBT´s...

[@manolodocampo7108]

I wonder. Do really tanks face other tanks? It seems it is better to face tanks with infantry weapons and reserve tanks for infantry support

[@nicolas8098]

Sick profile picture :3

[@ABC21129]

I think that obsolete tanks aren't completely outmatched if they are correctly employed in a defensive manner

[@BK-uf6qr]

Overhyped Russian tanks. Since this war started many of your episodes look foolish.

[@madcat3525]

Great video!

[@R.Sole88109]

From what I've learnt about tank vs tank Crew training/skill plays a BIG part. So which side has the better crews? Leaving aside the defending the homeland vs invading foreign lands mentally affects.

[@namesurname624]

reuniting previously owned lands*

[@alexanderd6793]

@@namesurname624 Yeah, how about we don't do political talk here, we're talking about weapons, not politics.

[@АлександрНевский-с9т9я]

@@alexanderd6793 how about "no"

[@namesurname624]

@@alexanderd6793 it's relevant to the comment about the mental effect of what being on either side is to the soldiers

[@alexanderd6793]

@@АлександрНевский-с9т9я How about you regognize it as a foreign country with only 20% Russian population that has a right to sovereignty.

[@classiccorvetteguide9147]

Interesting how we saw it truly come out now that the wars been going on.

[@chrissmith7669]

As Long as the Russian military doesn’t get how to integrate infantry and armor it doesn’t matter how spiffy your tanks are.

[@lechendary]

they do but russian army is built for more nuclear warfare which this luckily isnt thats together with what you said a big reason they are luckily losing

[@chrissmith7669]

@@lechendary i think another channel explained it well. The underlying Russian expectation is that the conscripts are poorly trained and paid, willing to sell anything they are issued. The battle plan is to lob artillery at a target till all resistance is destroyed then send in the poorly trained and equipped infantry to hold the position while the artillery moves up and begins the cycle over. The Ukrainian military is doing well as the utilize nato tactics of small units of highly trained and disciplined fighters who can get close to the enemy and neutralize them. Their much smaller force hasn’t stopped Russian advances but has made them horribly costly.

[@lechendary]

@@chrissmith7669 that could be true, i just saw a video of someone explaining that the russian military is built for a nuclear war where they dont have immediate acces to supplies thats why we see basically everything being sent there, its just how the russian army is built but as we can see that doesnt really work in a non nuclear environment

[@chrissmith7669]

@@lechendary Neils Stephenson put it best in Cryptonomicron: „Russian weapons were designed to allow a drunken, half frozen, uneducated Cossack to figure how to operate it in the dark. It’s not a slight but design concept. Don’t Design something needs a college education to operate, or months of training to learn or less to repair. Make it dead nuts simple is the best idea for combat. It drove me nuts as newer platforms were fielded during my time and they came with more and more computer consoles just to troubleshoot.

[@lechendary]

@@chrissmith7669 that is true russian tanks were way simpeler then western ones but that was mostly to make production easier and keep costs low and when russia doesnt do that they cant make enough of them as we can see with the t14 armata

[@rayotoxi1509]

is the next video in the making ?

[@comradeweismann6947]

Comments for the Algorithm God