Absolutely magnificent presentation on one of the most iconic watch in modern history. Thanks Jack!
@MS-sy8ls2 жыл бұрын
Reference points! 🙌🏻 More of these please!
@StagguhLee2 жыл бұрын
I found this to be a much more coherent history of the design and history of the watch than other Reference Points which have often felt like a whistle stop tour of all the different references without much context.
@watchdork2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! The royal oak achieved being masculine and very elegant at the same time. It has quickly become my favorite watch because of the story and design. Although my favorite is the soulless silver dial 15300st according to Jack on the podcast haha! Fantastic video thank you for sharing
@klaushaunstrupchristensen72522 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite watches which I will newer own. Because I am either to sane or to much of a cheapskate. Happily what drew my mind in a hypnotic way was the beautiful Cartier Tank Louis worn during this excellent presentation. A stunningly beautiful pure gold watch at a almost affordable price.
@benedict38402 жыл бұрын
Awesome and thanks for sharing magazine content also to non-subscribers. Superb!
@donulldh47852 жыл бұрын
You make a video of a watch that I do care for and most likely never wear, grab 15 minutes of my attention, and afterward I am glad to have watched. Thanks
@keeponjumping50002 жыл бұрын
Great video! 14000 Series really is the most interesting range! And perfect size!
@WN4272 жыл бұрын
I think I love this series more now than Talking Watches. It's great to learn more technical aspects and historical development of such truly iconic watches.
@svdb44949 ай бұрын
Great presentation. Thanks a lot.
@tigerjean8882 жыл бұрын
Great summary of such a complicated history!
@Karenvieira84 Жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for sharing it!
@BigWoschech2 жыл бұрын
The term "jumbo" is used frequently but is never defined in the Video. What differentiates a jumbo from non-jumpo Royal Oak?
@BenTramer2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it would have been nice for him to define Jumbo but my understanding is that a Royal Oak Jumbo was a 39mm with a 2121 movement (JLC 920) and now it's the 16202.
@zulfiqarfirdaus53432 жыл бұрын
Jumbo means 39mm
@watchdork2 жыл бұрын
39 mm with no running seconds and thinner case than the standard RO
@TeabagTore2 жыл бұрын
The jumbo is all the above, however it is a nickname given to the original RO as 39mm was quite the size back in 1972 when it was launched.
@algernonwolfwhistle63512 жыл бұрын
Superb. Thanks for posting.
@lancechan82562 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this! Was hoping to see a review on the 14332/4332 reference vs 4100.
@menaseven90932 жыл бұрын
Nice AP Royal Oak history
@I_like_YT_lots2 жыл бұрын
Great vid! I personally think the Royal Oak had saved AP from obscurity and if the sports watch market/hype never took off who knows if they already went bankrupt.
@BenTramer2 жыл бұрын
I loved Jack's ostensibly perfunctory drawing on the thick stock paper...almost ASMR lol
@Justinmzack2 жыл бұрын
Nice video but I missed a key element of most of the reference points I’ve seen, which is the fact that you typically aggregate and show the actual watches, not just pictures of them. Like the most recent Explorer 1 RP was absolutely sick.
@jerdonsbabbler3515 Жыл бұрын
@4:26 he says that polishing stainless steel had not really been done before at this level. But what about knives and airplane parts and stuff? On another subject, I am wearing a RO while I watch this great Hodinkee piece, above. I'm appreciating that the RO stays flat and lays flat but allows a certain flow of air. It is reassuringly cool against the wrist. The Nautilus, for all of its charm, is a warm watch. It's so comfortable, it doesn't feel like metal.
@GavinMcLeod2 жыл бұрын
What a damn good video
@donald19832 жыл бұрын
After wearing many watches across different brands (Panerai, Omega, Rolex, Tudor, Zenith, Vacheron and AP,) the Royal Oak is still my all time favourite.
@glanci822 жыл бұрын
Beacuse you didn’t try a Patek yet eheheheh
@donald19832 жыл бұрын
@@glanci82 haha yeah but the Nautilus design doesn’t really appeal much to me.
@lucentics2 жыл бұрын
try a Nautilus. will be a hard decision. it’s a fair fight between 222 vs Nautilus vs Royal Oak vs Daytona for me 😁
@hughmo57692 жыл бұрын
This just made me re-think about getting a 5402. That 14802 is stunning!
@Chips-Lab2 жыл бұрын
Love that content
@dineshjiawan2 жыл бұрын
Legendary watch👍👌👊
@FreshFr33ze2 жыл бұрын
One day I’ll own one!
@wongbryson2 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed reading the magazine. 👍
@Hmmmmmmnm2 жыл бұрын
How many platinum Royal oaks were made? Only remember the 15202 in platinum w/ the green dial.
@mfhashmi9912 жыл бұрын
Only 85
@Hmmmmmmnm2 жыл бұрын
@@mfhashmi991 I mean how many different Royal oak models were platinum? Just 1?
@fayezejel30222 жыл бұрын
I love it
@juniorjohnson5961 Жыл бұрын
Who does Jack's Hair .
@jimbaranresidence82 жыл бұрын
If u opt for ROO 3126 enhandement, AP will reduce 59jewel to 54jewel, the watch weight gets lighter, the min hand jump everytime u adjust the time.....
@allenhenyo7932 жыл бұрын
Didn’t the Cartier Santos did the exposed screws on the bezel first?
@allenhenyo7932 жыл бұрын
@@Bu-22 correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t the screws already there to hold the bezel on the first design? Its just not just as big as todays screws
@allenhenyo7932 жыл бұрын
@@Bu-22 😆 i wish someone with a first version of santos should tell us if the bolt is actually a screw. 😂
@Armoer2 жыл бұрын
@@allenhenyo793 the screws in the Santos bezel are real screws, not bolts like the Royal Oak. That is why they are not neatly aligned.
@peterk8142 жыл бұрын
Cartier is junk
@bolingergrandeannee2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and clear explanation, the story about in house mouvements present only after 1996 it’s not very well known.
@trustinsaam5415 Жыл бұрын
Using the word “box” million times! Was the “growth of personal business” related to boxes of the AP perhaps?
@peterbradshaw8018 Жыл бұрын
A Veblen good if ever there was one.
@mikejones-dx8bx10 ай бұрын
owning veblen goods are when you know you've made it! especially if you got in before it became a veblen good.
@tomee72 жыл бұрын
Mentioned the 15000 series but didn't include any photo of the forgotten 15300
@kevinhayes78302 жыл бұрын
Beautiful watch 😎👍
@mikejones-dx8bx10 ай бұрын
It's unfortunate that the new 7121 movement is not as attractive looking or as well hand-finished as the previous 2121 movement. I am noticing collectors are starting to realize this so if you want a watch that is more collectible I would only buy a RO Jumbo with the 2121 movement.
@adamw.71692 жыл бұрын
The insurance ad before videos really kinda spoils it a bit every time
@peteanddrake42422 жыл бұрын
I called Hodinkee today to buy a $7K watch and they hung up on me because I would not leave a message and wait for a "remote" person to call me back.
@Theo-ul8qm7 ай бұрын
Boy, do I miss seeing Jack on youtube...
@Mr.1-OAK2 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌
@folumb2 жыл бұрын
I'm conflicted. I want to see other AP watches, feels like they ONLY make the royal oak. At the same time, why would they listen to me? I'll never be able to afford a royal oak or any other reference they put out
@HiroYukimura072 жыл бұрын
I changed the playback speed at 0.75x and donno why.
@kevinn11582 жыл бұрын
Ok, time to enrage the Royal Oak fans. I think this design looks seriously dated. And as always, collectors with a boatloads of money inflate the prices of these beyond the reach of most people who do like this watch. A shame. Same goes for the Nautilus.
@DB018002 жыл бұрын
We need Ben Clymer doing these episodes with real emotions and real watches, Jack Forster is very good for Hey Hodinkee but fails to connect with the viewers especially for a Reference Points episode.