Repeated Games in Game Theory

This video goes over a repeated games prisoner's dilemma problem. This is like a duopoly that is deciding whether to collude or not on an infinite time scale. Other helpful videos that might go along with this one…
Prisoner’s Dilemmas, Part I - • Prisoners Dilemma Exam...
Prisoner’s Dilemmas, Part II - • Prisoners Dilemma Exam...
Time discounting - • Time Discounting & Pre...

[@lazybear881]

Bravo! You made something I was confused with for a very long time really simple (:

[@christiechen193]

thank you Ashley! this is super helpful

[@MuditJhawar]

Thank you for this video

[@pedroricardomartinscasella641]

This is a nice thing, I just read Billions and billions by Carl Sagan, and there is a chapter he explains the Tit-for-Tat method, I got really curious to see how this actually works.

[@ifeanyi_maduka]

🤣

[@nitishsou7439]

Thank you

[@warriorfitnesscenter9718]

(D,D) isn't a a NE since either player could profitably deviate to C. (D,C) and (C,D) are NE though, if H > 10, since the "D" player can't profitably deviate since C will reduce their payoff to 10, and C can't profitably deviate since 0 < 2. This looks, instead, like a hawk dove game.

[@user-kx4vo1ol5h]

It is wow my sister it amazing explaination

[@tysonchao2714]

was it about infinite sequence?

[@tysonchao2714]

DEAR ASH can you explian this formula?

[@edwardkemp1427]

@Ashley Hodgson Hello Ashely, thank you for your video. I am making a simple formula for a dissertation using prisoner's dilemma. Would you be willing to video chat and review my formula to make sure it makes sense?

[@JoaoFerreira-el7jw]

i love you

[@emmanuelkpawul8333]

can you work on this please Firms A and B serve the same market. They have constant average costs of GHS2. per unit. The firms can choose either a high price (GHS10) or a low price (GHS5) for their output. When both firms set a high price, total demand = 10,000 units which is split evenly between the two firms. When both set a low price, total demand is 18,000, which is again split evenly. If one firm sets a low price and the second a high price, the low-priced firm sells 15,000 units, the high-priced firm only 2,000 units. a. Analyse the pricing decisions of the two firm as a non-cooperative game: i. In the normal from representation, construct the pay-off matrix, where the elements of each cell of the matrix are the two firm profits. ii. Derive the equilibrium set of strategies. iii. Explain why this is an example of the prisoners' dilemma game. b. Analyse the pricing decisions of the two firms as a co-operative game: i. Is the {low, low} outcome a Nash equilibrium if both players play a grim strategy and have a discount factor of 0.65? ii. How may history affect the behaviour of the pricing strategy of the firms in this game?

[@zahidyldz1940]

unbelievablesın ablacım (tuğçe yazdırdı)