Republicans And Democrats Square Off In Heated Debate Over ATF Pistol Brace Regulations

Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) and Jerry Nadler (D-NY) led debate on H.J. Res. 44, which expresses disapproval for the ATF's new "Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'Stabilizing Braces.'"
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com

[@gunshipgray4295]

The ATF should be disbanded permanently on charges of treason.

[@lindabergman3127]

Agreed100 defund n recall

[@maverickpaladin4155]

I'll go you one better. Federal law enforcement must be severely curtailed in addressing only such issues such as are clearly constitutional.

[@jamiesmith6838]

..and the ATF sister the IRS.

[@jayrue239]

So pistol braces give more fire power to handguns? Isn't this like putting a Lamborghini sticker on your honda civic to get 1000 more horse power?

[@M00n3at3r]

Dude, I slap Honda stickers on everything I own to boost the HP. Maybe I should have been using Lambo this whole time. I’ll have my wife get her Honda tat covered with a Lambo badge. That should give me more power right? 😂😂😂

[@texasman45]

No joke I did this with my old 98 Nissan 😂

[@MountainBikeTx]

@@M00n3at3r that will give her more power 😳

[@M00n3at3r]

@@MountainBikeTx well she doesn't need that. She's hitting her peak and I'm hitting my drop off so I should probably get the Lambo bage tatted on my....yeah. that should solve it.

[@firstjohn3123]

Yep, but making it illegal in the process,with a 20yr jail sentence for doing it...😂 Nadler is a fool, and any dem on his side is one as well. Like Biden, he can't think straight anymore.

[@RemyLebeau1985]

Weird that, in order to keep the country safe, all I have to do is pay the ATF $200.

[@jamiesmith6838]

😂

[@elkilachoCink]

😂

[@merrilllewis3926]

Even if a brace did make a weapon more deadly or weather or not a veteran owns the brace, a well regulated militia ,being nessesary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed.

[@robertsmith2956]

That is the rub. democrats despise free states.

[@lindabergman3127]

Any politicians that are going against our constitutional rights should immediately resign be recalled n impeachment for violating our constitutional rights

[@rickb2267]

They swore to uphold the Constitution when they took office! They are traitors if they don't.

[@Haliwa-Saponi]

Correct the are going against their oath to defend the constitution. They are bad employees they forget they work for us

[@jamiesmith6838]

ANY & ALL Ceritified & Unverified Constitutional Oath swearing politician needs Recalling for ANY Violtions of said official document this country was Founded under. The problem is Treason is no longer enforced as a Federal Crime.. Punishable by death.

[@LRRPFco52]

Tyrants never quit until they are forced to quit. The Founders intimately understood this from personal experience.

[@waynebollentin989]

What's hilarious is if you take the brace off you can still have the firearm. Also common sense would tell you the firearm is more concealable without the brace but we're not talking about common sense or good faith arguments. It's about an agenda, period.

[@heatshield]

Well said. This joker is making it sound like a brace makes everything more dangerous. I guarantee some of the people ate it right up too. Makes me wonder how many of these “mass” events actually had the brace shouldered. Not that it really matters because they would have done it either way.

[@KiNgChArLeSIII3006]

EXACTLY!! All of them were crying about this many people died in this shooting and this many died in that shooting but none of them can state how many lives would’ve been saved if the shooter took off this plastic piece that supposedly according to the potato in chief instantly makes the pistol a higher caliber lol

[@jamiesmith6838]

Simple rhetoric to disarm law abiding Americans to easly place a boot on necks without fear of equal reprisal.

[@chavezchrissy]

​@@KiNgChArLeSIII3006how many had arm braces?? I would want to hear those statistics personally for at least a argument why to implement this rule.

[@michaelmagness9881]

Sense and politician dont belong in the same conversation it's like oil and watet

[@not_so_tactical8074]

I’m confused, how many mass casualty events have been caused by an AR pistol or similar? I believe it is common that most “mass” shooters use pistols. Also just because they are illegal does that mean people with criminal intent just say oh well.. can’t use it now because it’s against the law??!! That is such an asinine statement that it would decrease any kind of gun crime.

[@kaiser8411]

These people are low resolution thinkers and don't read between the lines.

[@kennyrichard2971]

A Pistol brace is like a prosthesis limb for a gun that’s all

[@proximap2151]

Wesley Hunt Thank You!!!

[@64422ar]

OMG if we just get rid of pistol braces we can end gun violence. SMH

[@robertsmith2956]

What will we do without the laughter every monday hearing about all the bodies NOT killed by pistol braces in chicago. Why not just outlaw shooting more than 3 people? That would end mass shootings.

[@keonyang3332]

​​​@@robertsmith2956 You would need to include self defense shootings for that tho.

[@robertsmith2956]

@@keonyang3332 No you wouldn't. Rhittenhouse only shot ONE person, in FOUR separate self defense shootings.

[@poboy942]

Jerry nadler or ole poopy pants whichever you prefer , if he is for it you csn bet its a bad idea

[@ricardogavalos5471]

Somebody need to fact check these people and be able to call them out on their false claims on the spot

[@jamiesmith6838]

They won't. They think there will be room at the bottom if they get their Way of the Loser? They have yet a clue? They are disposable.

[@kaiser8411]

Take SBR's and Machine guns off of the NFA.

[@ron8566]

This gentleman has a great handle on the facts and reality.

[@radicalttc]

Amen, He sure does.

[@waynecreech]

Braces didn't kill or injure any of those people, mentally ill people went out to hurt innocent people period. Mentally ill or criminals in general will not care if the firearm they are going to use is in atf compliance or if its a felony.. killing people is against the law too right ?

[@robertsmith2956]

ATF ok'ing mentally ill people buying the GUN is what gets people killed. Not the pistol brace.

[@jayempress4203]

According to Nadless and his cronies, if criminals decided to use knives, forks, ropes, vehicles, pea shooters or any other item to kill with, then those items would be kept from the hands of the American public with the same vigor that guns are gone after? Don't we already have laws to protect children? The weapons aren't the problem. Something in the minds and souls of these killers is twisted. Take the guns and they will find something else to use. They will find other methods for accomplìshing their goal to kill. In the mean time, how many of these mass tragedies occurr in gun free states? Why do people go to gunfree states to kill with guns?

[@billythegoat8634]

Favored by mass shooters? Never seen the animals in the inner city with stabilization braces

[@rickb2267]

More laws do not stop CRIMINALS from killing people! (Definition of a criminal - someone who does not obey the law.)

[@harleyboy65]

The weapon in the Nashville shooting was not an ar rifle, it is on video

[@lionheartedlux]

So i have not finished this video yet but one of the democrats said that if this rule was repealed that criminals could get short barrelled weapons more easily without a background check. Except you DO NEED a background check to get ANY firearm in the US. At least from an ffl. Mass shooters dont exclusively use braced firearms and unless you can show metrics that the shootings these weapons were used in resulted in more deaths and it was because of this type of setup you cannot argue that braced pistols are more dangerous. Not to mention there is nothing stopping them from just putting a stock on it anyways. Pistol braces are inferior to stocks. And you are punishing disabled people. But on top of it, I completely disagree that it is the place of ATF to interpret these as stocks. Congress should do it. Not ATF

[@rickb2267]

You cannot say "The ATF said it was okay to use them" (so we have been, thus acknowledging their authority), and then say that now they have no right to rescind a 'law'. It never WAS a law because the ATF doesn't have the power to make laws! That is confusing and Republicans need to clear that up and stop saying people used pistol braces because the ATF said they could.

[@LeaveItToBeaner]

40 million pistol braces in circulation. If we were really the problem you would know about it. They’ve been used in 3 shootings. Get fucked

[@mitchellratcliff4090]

The issue is NOT that we are acknowledging the ATF's authority and then not acknowledging it. The issue is that the ATF have flip flopped on this issue a few times now. All of which we believe is unconstitutional for them to do. Now the issue is that the ATF gave only a few months notice and then did not even attempt to reach out to all of the people with pistol braces to let them know before this law went into effect. Currently, the number of non-complying people is too high for all of them to know what is going on. It affectly made ignorant people into felons who would have to pay a ton of money in fines and have jail time for simply not knowing that this is even happening. With these circumstances, it is an excellent time for pro 2A people to fire back against the anti 2A legislation that has been coming in lately.

[@LeaveItToBeaner]

@@mitchellratcliff4090 with that much non compliance the Supreme Court HAS to step in

[@Anon54387]

I agree with Tlaib. We do need accountability for those causing this violence. We need to start keeping the violent people in prison for the safety of the rest of us.

[@Charsept]

The fact that somewhere around 20 million brace equipped pistols are out in the population and yet represent an incredibly small fraction of guns used in crime, shows they are not dangerous or unusual. And the few times a brace equipped pistol HAS been used in a crime, the criminal could have just swapped out that brace for a stock in literally 40 seconds. They were going to murder people anyway, so what's a small crime on top of that? The popularity of these so-called SBRs prove that they aren't dangerous enough to be regulated under the NFA.

[@rueyen3044]

"pacifically" 😂😂😂

[@DrewVerdin]

Get rid of the ATF, the IRS, make weed legal, and you'll have a super happy United States ❤

[@aceclan4255]

The second shall not be infringed period , anyone who put stipulations is commiting treason to the use people

[@danduhman1955]

Congress and senate should release their “need/right” to armed security while in session or in DC.

[@clarencevickrot3531]

But the AR15 does weigh as much as 10 moving boxes, right?

[@tomjones9510]

“We have had more than 290 mass shootings this year. That’s more than the amount of days in a year.” 33:15 Which side is lying here ?

[@jayempress4203]

My calendar has 365/+1q4 on it. God only knows what calendar politicians from Michigan utilize.

[@storminnorman7445]

Titus, you are an embarrassment to Nevada.

[@Bromo_Sexual]

A stable gun is a *safe gun* and *stabilizing braces* make a gun *safer to shoot.* ATF banning pistol stabilizing braces makes guns less stable and therefore *less safe* to shoot.

[@pissyjo1213]

Hearing after hearing instead of defunding. Which is what you actually ran on and have failed to do.

[@Jobin909]

This is amazing

[@Sneedweednfeed]

Listen to the way they talk and the points they make. Its not about the brace. They want all the guns gone.

[@__-bc4bs]

Texas is the best. True America. #DanSmoot #WeThePeople

[@charlesmorris6952]

Vote Yes Patriot

[@stephenmcgill3823]

The penguin (Oompa Loompa) has spoken.

[@Danhiss29]

Pistol braces weren't used to do anything. They used a gun. The gun was just as deadly with a collapsable or fixed stock. What this is about is gun owners subverting the ridiculous SBR NFA requirement, as if mobsters are still running around with sawed off shotguns amd Tommy guns under their trench coats. Technically, the guns are less lethal (albeit fractionally) when they're SBRs, because muzzle velocity is reduced. Pistol braces don't make a gun more concealable. None of these killers were attempting to conceal their weapon, anyway!

[@pradenk]

How are, We the People, to secure a free state? 2ndA states clearly, the militia i.e. the people are necessary, not the gov't is necessary. Although the SCOTUS did define a lot of what the words in the 2ndA mean, they however, did not define "Necessary" "Free State" or "Secure". The militia i.e. the people, are "Necessary" to the security of a free state. How do the people secure a free state? With braces or stocks, with regulated arms we can't take across states lines without gov't permission, regulated mag capacity to 10rds, ergonomically unsafe & less accurate arms because parts & accessories are regulated or banned? It seems like the gov't wants the 2ndA to be the gov't itself is necessary instead of what the 2ndA clearly states, which is the militia i.e. the people are "Necessary". The SCOTUS needs to define "Necessary". SCOTUS needs to define "Secure", especially in the context of how its used in the 2ndA; to "Secure" a free state. How are the people "Necessary" and how do the people "Secure" a free state???? Scotus needs to define that. Plus, scotus needs to define what "Right" means. We can find that in the preamble. "Inalienable Right". An Inalienable Right can not be transformed or taken away, not even by gov't. The only way to secure a free state is by miltiary weapons current of the time to repel invasion. That is "Necessary", and, its the peoples "Inalienable Right" to "Secure" a free state, or, when called upon in service to the United States; not the gov'ts right to secure a free state. Lastly, the argument that regualtions are for public safety is irrelevant, because the SCOTUS ruled "Law Enforcement" has NO obligation to protect us. Which means its our responsibility to protect ourselves, secure a free state and Nation when called upon in service to the United States. Scotus never defined law enforcement as only state police officers. They simply stated, law enforcement. Atf are federal law enforcement. Federal Marshall's are law enforcement. Police officers are state law enforcement, Sheriff's & deputies are state law enforcement. Scotus didnt differentiate between state and federal law enforcement; which means all law enforcement, state or federal-- has (NO obligation to protect you). So that argument, especially adding the above comment from the 2ndA that clearly stating the People are "Neccessary", not the gov'tis necessary, "For public safety", is garbage. The govts argument that they have arbitrary powers to protect us is a usurpation on the "Individual Inalienable Right" to self defense of property, family, self, state and country. To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless!!!

[@robertsmith2956]

Yes, they a re so easy to conceal, The Armed Fisherman in florida keeps getting stopped and harassed wearing it..

[@danielread1942]

If we want to talk about legal issues then the fact that the ATF has no legal right to change the law is absolute. Only congress can change laws. Debate is over under the laws of our constitution.

[@d3ltaohniner261]

I'm getting really tired of the Nashville school shooter being attributed with using a pistol with a stabilizing brace, because it's factually incorrect. It used a Kel-Tec Sub 2000 rifle chambered in the 9mm pistol caliber cartridge.

[@robg1046]

It's way easier to conceal it without a brace. The brace should be mandatory.

[@chrisferguson1911]

They don't want the brace gone because of gun deaths, they want the guns gone. We don't want them to be ruled against just because of veterans. We are happy a veteran found a way around the GCA, but when you built or bought a pistol braced weapon the last thing you did was think about thanking a veteran...you more than likely thanked your significant other. The reason we want to be able to buy not only pistol stabilizing braces, but anything that we should be able to purchase without charge or permission, is because as Americans it is our inalienable right to do so.🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

[@shirleydickey6140]

It's not the gun it's the people. 1934, what was the population? Punish the criminals more harshly and they will stop killing Grandmas.

[@robertsmith2956]

All they had to do was outlaw popo from having tommy guns, and no crook would get shot by them since they would know that ain't a cop shooting at me for valentine's day.

[@bodybywallypersonaltrainin4217]

IN HIGH SCHOOL...1967-1970, MANY HAD RIFLES ON THE BACK WINDOW OF PICK-UP TRUCKS DURING HUNTING SEASON - NEVER ONCE A SHOOTING; AND THAT GOES FOR ALL THE SCHOOLS IN THE TAMPA BAY AREA

[@juliolopes2892]

For those that are unaware, the ATF will allow you the right to possess a short barreled rifle if you pay them $200. This achieved by purchasing a tax stamp. These pistols that receive braces were approved for possession, use and shouldering up until the revenue generated from the sale of tax stamps saw a significant decline. Basket is aware of this and is pulling every emotion trigger possible to push for this reinterpretation of established regulation. It’s all about the money, it always has been and has never been about safety.

[@hoganlogan397]

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON!!!

[@fdehands7494]

Why would HJ44 cost anything

[@johnnelson5742]

800 people die from obesity daily. Better closed down places like McDonald's or where ever you eat. Come on Jerry really

[@rickb2267]

The old "lipstick on a pig"; haven't heard that one today...🙄

[@maverickpaladin4155]

Shouldn't Tliab be in prison by now? How is she standing on the House floor except in manicles and leg irons?

[@macatony]

dems are special people

[@dominicmorones8314]

Bruh laid that shit down. Tellin it like it is. If you can’t understand what such a well spoken veteran whose served us has to say, then you are exactly what’s wrong with this country today. God bless America.

[@jimweikak457]

They're not thinking about the safety of the handicap or the elderly, I'm handicapped myself, if this goes through I will be suing the federal government, along with ten thousand other people that I have managed to put together!, And that number is growing!!, We is handicapped people, this goes against the people with handicaps act , and our Fourth Amendment !, A pistol brace is not a weapon, it cannot hurt anybody it's a piece of plastic, it would be like putting a band on crutches if you got a broken leg you wouldn't be able to get around without your crutches, that is what a pistol brace is to a handicapped person!,

[@jembailey-orchard8932]

Nashville shooter had an AR pistol but didn’t kill anyone with it from what I understand

[@HWwise]

This has nothing to do with a piece of plastic. This is about a non elected body making laws.

[@steveeardley4094]

How many lives have been lost to the use of the brace😎

[@DawnGay]

A pistol is easier to conceal without a brace!

[@timanderson9894]

Might be more effective to bring a brace on the floor and demonstrate how one works. 🤦‍♂️

[@therealjasonbilyeu]

There should be a date this occurred.

[@Anon54387]

The CONSIDERED judgment of the BATFE. LMAO!

[@chancearmand2247]

Its so annoying listening to them spew obvious lies and theres no accountability. Just because they say a lie loud enough, doesnt make it true. Hopefully people wake up before its too late.

[@Anon54387]

Anyone who registers one of these is a fool. The ATF will find some way to stitch them up.

[@ricardofranco7461]

TRUMP ,,,, CRUZ 2024

[@DARisse-ji1yw]

Yup... but I'd prefer Cruz on the Supreme Court .

[@johnsonman1802]

the majority of homicides are committed with pistols and knives.

[@radicalttc]

The ATF only allows themselves actual Assault Rifles, fully auto. That should tell you something.

[@ABIGD0NK3Y]

This is so sad.... Make NO MISTAKE... This... IS A LITERACY PROBLEM.... These poor poor people cannot read... And they NEED educated.... on exactly what is written...."SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!" let's get these poor people some help... This just PROVES... THE AMERICAN EDUCATION SYSTEM IS FAILING AND IT BEEN FAILING... Since the 1950s

[@radicalttc]

The ATF. Like Hitler's brown shirts, Make the rules and change them when they want too.

[@beargillium2369]

Wait so the one guy's rebuttal is that short barreled rifles are illegal, but in the same breath he touts how often they're used by criminals... So laws don't work vs criminals. Who knew. Keep blowing that smoke while you try to take the rights of your constituents away.

[@Sneedweednfeed]

Not to be mean but when a when yousee some reps go up you know just from their look you're about to hear a short bus take.

[@beckettcohen5493]

Don't we have more pressing issues to attend to? I mean leave the constitution as is and as was meant to be and let's focus on our real problems.

[@ZNP420]

What about those switches in all the hoods? Better make those illegal! Oh wait…

[@NotgoingToohappen]

There is literally no such thing as republican or Democrat...they are literally both one in the same. There's no such thing as left wing or right wing because both wings belong to the same bird. Its called division. Divide and conquer.

[@n34z3r]

Donalds and Hunt. 💪🏾

[@johnnelson5742]

You gonna pay the tax for them ??

[@KrispyRootbeer]

What would make a brace more desirable than a stock if you're already breaking the law? You could have a shooter with a shorter barrel but they think they'll still use a brace? I don't think people like that would care about a brace regulation or an SBR registration. The brace is a piece of plastic that is slightly worse at being a stock and doesn't change how the gun operates period. You can try to argue but it will only show how ignorant you are about how guns actually work.

[@2AMOSHPIT]

These democrats are nuts.

[@its23skidu]

So adding something can make another thing smaller? Physics might disagree.

[@Anon54387]

WTF is that guy from Maryland just after the 40 minute mark wearing? It looks like he's reading for a part in a pirate movie while wearing a business suit.

[@Anon54387]

And that guy from Maryland with the purple on his head apparently doesn't know that the fighting between the colonists and the English started a bit over a year before the Declaration of Independence when the English tried to infringe their gun rights. The Americans felt so strongly about their right to arms that they shot the English troops rather than handing over their guns, ammo and powder.

[@Anon54387]

And that purple wearing guy is twisting what Scalia said. Scalia said that no right is unlimited. That's different from saying the government can infringe a right. It's why murder is illegal but owning a gun is not.

[@lillian-annwhitingmonkarel2774]

I do not believe that the second amendment mentions anything about what race you are or not what gender you are or are not it simply says that it is your right to protect and defend those with common sense would understand that to be to protect the innocent and to defend the innocent and the people who cannot defend themselves

[@radicalttc]

Guns arent evil, some people are. Like democrat politicians.

[@mr.e432]

That guy say assault pistol?

[@Ceaserization]

Dont know why your even talking about guns. We can own guns. Any kind of guns.. and the reason we're not going to let you change our laws is ....if you get one You'll keep taking until we have none...you want less guns tell your security to get rid of there's..then there will be less crooks with guns...🤬🤬🤬

[@sagunguru9678]

290 mass shootings? 🤔

[@SolomonGoldschmidt]

i have a great idea for a new federal firearms law....any household with a minor child that have firearms in the house hold will be subject to random unannounced visits by cps investigators to see if there are any unsecured firearms or ammunition anywhere the child can access them without supervision,and also the child must undergo a periodotic interview and evaluation every six months with a psychiatrist,maybe a half hour asking standardized questions to gauge and monitor the childs mental health status.if any red flags or concerns arise during one of the interviews,a notice is sent to the counties prosecuting attorney recommending that all firearms be removed from the property where the child resides,and a 30 day notice is given to the parents if the prosecutor deems it is a good idea based on evidence,then the parents have until the 30 day mark to appeal the firearms forfeiture.this process will continue until the child or children reach 18 years old,if there is one child that hits 18 and the sibling is say 15 then the youngest child sets the end of the process.

[@Anon54387]

Um, no, that runs afoul of not only the 2nd Amendment but the 4th. BTW, a kid is more likely to die by drowning in a household with a pool than by accidental gun shot in a household with a gun. Similarly, a kid is more likely to die by accidental ingestion of a household chemical than by accidental gun shot. Yet we never hear impassioned speeches from the house floor by Democrats calling for swimming pool regulations or a law requiring household chemicals be locked up. It never has been about safety for the Dems, rather control. It's why the Dems release violent people from prison and then call for more gun controls when those people are again violent. We need to keep the violent people locked up for the safety of the rest of us, not release them and make it harder for the rest of us to carry guns for our defense.

[@winry2357]

Huh. I didn’t realize pistols are only deadly if they have a brace on them. That’s weird, coulda swore some guy killed a bunch of people with pistols at Virginia Tech… not to mention I thought that pistols were used in a majority of gun deaths. I didn’t realize they only kill if they have braces on them. Weird. Seriously though, this only restricts the ability for disabled folks to defend themselves. It’s a disgusting act. Also, being more accurate is a good thing. Just saying. If someone were to shoot me, I hope to heck they’re accurate. I don’t wanna be shot 15 times before they finally hit something vital. Quick and painless or not at all please.

[@antcannon]

They want you to not be able to aim with precision because precision = deadly force when that deadly force is used against someone who is breaking the law. Therefore they should mis their target and hit an u intentes person and give that person a chance to cause more harm.

[@jimweikak457]

This is the point she's driving at we want your guns because they're deadly!, They do this and win !, They will come after the rest of your games because it doesn't matter what you put on your again it's still deadly, and that's what they fail to realize, a gun is a gun is a gun, they all fire bullets, making them all deadly !, So what they're telling you is they want all of your guns, without actually telling you that, these people are more dangerous than any gun, these people don't live in the real world but we do, they've got no clue what we have to go through, they have their bodyguards near limousines and there are towers and their gated communities, I shall not comply no matter what the hell they say!!!!, It's my INALIENABLE RIGHT , PASSED DOWN TO ME FROM GOD ABOVE!! , IF THEY GOING TO STOP ALL THE KILLINGS, ALL THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO IS CLEAR OUT THE WHITE HOUSE THE GOVERNMENT'S BEHIND THIS AND THIS PROVES ARE YOU HEARD OF ON THE NEWS FOR THE LAST YEAR IS HOW MANY CHILDREN HAVE BEEN KILLED DUE TO THIS GOVERNMENT, THEY'RE MORE WORRIED ABOUT A STABILIZER BRACE THAN THEY ARE FENTANYL IF THEY CARED ABOUT OUR CHILDREN IN THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY THEY WOULD HAVE CLOSED THAT BORDER BUT THEY DIDN'T, THIS PROVES THEY WANT YOUR GUNS

[@NicholasLaRosa0496]

33:21 Apparently 290 is more days than we have in a year. Lol

[@RatedRx13]

🤡

[@26marces84]

So know the braces are shooting people smh lol…..

[@PrecisionKing85]

I hope they understand that 16inch barrel AR15 rifles are 10x more accurate, deadlier, way faster projoectile, has a lot more penetration 😂😂. Thes whackos don't know nothing about guns!!!

[@ericshurtz4901]

I'm pretty sure that Sheila the monster ate a child for breakfast so how dare her!!!👹👶🥣 And for the pig with the lipstick don't forget to put Waco, Ruby ridge, and Las Vegas in your list!!! can't forget those😢✌️

[@glennbailey5478]

Humpty Dumpty has once again embarrassed himself in public

[@CJS309]

This is what happens when someone who knows nothing about guns has the power to legislate.