#SmartPLS4

[@hamidnaidjat336]

Mashallah, good interpretation, keep going

[@researchwithfawad]

Thank you, I will, in shaa allah

[@chernojallow1526]

Asalamu alaikum, thank you for your explanations as they are clear and succinct. Regarding the discriminant validity of my model, both Lacker and cross loadings are fine but one of my indicators' htmt is exactly 0.900, how should I fix that issue?

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. Please watch kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2fXhp99nq1sla8

[@aminrahman-mc8em]

suppose HTMT and Farell lacker criteria suggested no discriminant validity problem but while checking cross loading we find that, what is the next step the??

[@researchwithfawad]

If FL and HTMT is fine, you can leave cross loadings if the difference between loading is over 0.10.

[@Alhamzah_F_Abbas]

Can we have a video Solving Discriminant Validity by combining 2 construct?

[@researchwithfawad]

Yes we can

[@sherlockwings5482]

Does this Standard Deviation in Reaponses 0.25 need to reference? or May I have a citation about this part? sir, Thank you a lot.

[@researchwithfawad]

Thanks for watching. Here is the reference Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.

[@anitalow3628]

if we adopt the items of a construct from a seminal paper, but the number of items is only 3. how do we 'increase' the number of items for that construct to about 7 or 8?

[@researchwithfawad]

You can merge items from different scales but do not take items from toi many. Two sources shall do the trick.

[@bibliophile9350]

Sir can we check discriminant validity using AVE?

[@researchwithfawad]

Please refer to Fornell and Larcker Criterion.