Response | Imam Ali’s (as) opinion of Abu Bakr & Umar | Ammar Nakshawani

Don't forget to comment, like, and subscribe. Turn notifications on to make sure you don't miss our latest content.
Our website: www.twelvershia.net/
Twitter: @SunnahDiscourse
Facebook: Facebook.com/SunnahDiscourse
TikTok: @sunnidefense
Instagram: sunni.defense

[@cmsacademy1673]

As someone who has rejected twelver ideology I can say even if we accept the appointment of Ali, that there was a real dispute and dislike with Abu Bakr and Omar, etc etc ALL OF THAT STILL DOES NOT JUSTIFY OR VALIDATE 12 Imams!!! The problem is here. I think of someone dislikes the caliphs for whatever reason it is a historical question and does not make one believer or unbeliever. But 12 imam ideology is a separate belief all together not validated by the Quran that diminishes and undermines tawheed

[@rcmysm9123]

The Quran and sunnah of prophet Muhammad pbuh absolutely validates that only Allah swt chooses His representatives. To say otherwise is to be deaf and blind.

[@virtualwanderer]

Indeed. One can dislike the method of khalifa, or dislike some of their decisions, but one cannot dislike the sahaba that Allah has exalted and promised Jannah for them. Or dislike the one that has been praised by Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). One cannot also invalidate the khalifa. We must accept it despite our personal feelings and hold them 4 khalifas as rightous.

[@rcmysm9123]

​@@virtualwanderer What narration speaks of 4 righteous? We'll wait

[@rcmysm9123]

​@@virtualwanderer Have you read the Quran? Show one example where someone other than Allah swt. chooses His representatives on Earth?

[@virtualwanderer]

@@rcmysm9123 Are you saying that all 4 were not of the muhajirrun and ansar (which Allah has promised Jannah and praised in the Quran and Abu Bakr was exclusively even mentioned by Allah as being one of the two during the migration from makkah to madinah) or Ahlul Bayt that Allah said he had purified? Therefore, we must love them as Allah has loved them and believe in their rightousness. 9:100 - And the first forerunners [in the faith] among the Muhajireen and the An§ar and those who followed them with good conduct - Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him, and He has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow, wherein they will abide forever. That is the great attainment. 9:40 - If you do not aid the Prophet - Allah has already aided him when those who disbelieved had driven him out [of Makkah] as one of two, when they were in the cave and he said to his companion, "Do not grieve; indeed Allah is with us." And Allah sent down his tranquillity upon him and supported him with angels you did not see and made the word of those who disbelieved the lowest, while the word of Allah - that is the highest. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.

[@mohamedzuraimi2535]

Ive not been following this account for a few years. After coming back, it's ridiculous how the charlatan in dark blue attire is still using cheap and weak tactics to spread hate and deceit. Bro got a long way to go, it seems.

[@JN-eq3gl]

May Allah guide us all and bless SAN for enlighting our sunni brothers with well researched evidences.

[@tawhidism7030]

Ammar seems to have missed the part of the narration wherein Abbas RA calls Umar RA ‘Ameer ul Mu’mineen’

[@mhmd1854]

Don't care what your bias books call your idols because any one with 2 brain cells will know that they will add, erase, change and twist any narration to suit their narrative, but Alhmdullah somethings slip under their radars and expose the truth, Abbas calls Umar Amiru lmu'mineen yet he also see him as kazeb, Athem, Khader, kha'en, by that call why you don't call iblis an Angel, how anyone with 2 brain cells would believe this contradiction

[@theimdad1]

Can you provide exact source?

[@Doovie318]

@@theimdad1it’s in the Hadith of the video you just watched

[@rcmysm9123]

Umar is the king of bidah, don't believe me, see what he himself said.

[@Muwahid999]

@@rcmysm9123 Seeing your "great knowledge" in other threads , this kind of statement is normal from you.

[@tayamkay]

I am seriously, genuinely shocked at how adults can make a claim like this without seeing the blatant contradictions. After all these years of thinking, reading books, pondering, trying to understand, confronting ideas, they are unable (or unwilling) to just READ a narration as what it is. Their point is just ridiculously easy to refute I seriously don't understand how they overlook that.

[@TheCuriousMind631]

Curse on Enemies of Ahlul Bayt (as)

[@HajjiJesus]

Enemies of ahlul bayt are Ghulat and people who call people to literally call them as God beside God. How much Quran do you know? Biggest Ayyatullah can hardly read Fatiha without a mistake.

[@zedispahany7317]

Imam Baqir said: “I heard Jabir al-Ansari (Sahabi) say: ‘If Salman (al-Farisi) and Abu Dharr (al-Ghifari) were alive today and would see the group that claims the love of Ahl al-Bayt, they would declare them as liars. And if the claimants of Ahlul-Bayt would see Salman and Abu Dharr, they would indeed exclaim that they are insane.” [al-Mufid, Hayat al-Quloob, vol 2, pg. 929-930]

[@HajjiJesus]

@zedispahany7317 Can you prove a single known Shia student of Imam Baghir? I will give you the answer. Not even 1 exist. Not only that, no single Shai students for any other Ahlul Bayt. More than that, they did not marry from them nor their children, both female and female. Question is who did them marry from, lived, mixed, and die amongst? Companions of the Prophet and their children. This proves all Shia hate nonexistent in real. It is manufactured hate by Ayyatullah and put in the minds of children who then grew with it. Prove me wrong if you can.

[@deadsheep404]

Ameen, may Allah curse the rafidha

[@rcmysm9123]

@@HajjiJesus The leaders of the enemies of Ahlul Bayt are Abu Bakr, Umar, Aisha, Mu'awiya and Yazid. among

[@soujurix7979]

Dr. Ibn Kuthair Nakhjavani has gone MENTAL this time.

[@anudeep6884]

Please make book series on following books 1. Tohfa isna ashariyya by Shah Abdul azeez dehlavi 2. Izaalatul khafaa an khilaafatul khulafaa by Shah Waliullah dehlavi 3. Minhaj us sunnah an nabawiyya by ibn taymiyyah

[@majestic6303]

His Ramadan intention is to create more hate and animosity towards Sunni. What kind of intention this guy has to do it on Ramadan.

[@beyinvebeden6527]

What is better than revealing the truth in the holy month of Ramadan? See it as a blessing for yourself

[@noman3249]

"Exposing you from your own books" lollllll More like making a clown out of himself If he really was reputable and firm on his beliefs Why hasn't he debated a sunni yet? 🤔

[@Thugnificent99]

bro why did Ammar put mufti menk in the thumbnail ?

[@MiaMe-fz1jv]

it's a usual thing for him he puts sunni scholars in his thumbnails for clickbait.

[@mohajsart123]

@@MiaMe-fz1jvyou have a problem? It’s to literally bring more people to the truth. If he hadn’t put it, many people wouldn’t follow the true path.

[@MiaMe-fz1jv]

@@mohajsart123 hahahah okay jahil. Please do what you like and leave the followers of ahle sunnah and ahle bait alone. You guys are everywhere. Not a single sunni watches nakshwani's videos except scholars of course to debunk your lies, you will hardly find any comment of sunni under nakshwani's videos but you guys are so doubtful of your fabricated faith that you come and comment under every video just to agravate sunnis lol.

[@Ronaldinho720]

Look at all the previous videos put out from this channel before Ammar began his series and see how many Shia scholars this channel used as thumbnails. Even further more some thumbnails changes the depiction of the scholar. But when Ammar does it, you guys are up in your feelings laughable 😂

[@Dante-kx7mw]

Because putting Ammars face there alone would only make people not click on the video

[@jn6676]

6min - "We don't have any hairs" 😂

[@mohammedraza1297]

So disgusting that they simplify the issue of fadak as a "dispute"

[@MushafMehdi1]

Curse on the enemies of fatima What Were the Three Regrets that Abu Bakr Had When He Was on His Deathbed? According to Sunnite historical sources, in the last moments of Abu Bakr’s life, ‘Abd al-Rahman told him: “…you have always been righteous and a reformer, [so] do not be upset for anything in this world.” And Abu Bakr answered, “Yes, I am not upset for anything in this world, except three things I have done and I wish I had not done them and three things I have not done and I wish I had done them and three things I wish I had asked the Prophet (s). But what I wish I had not done, first is that I wish I had not invaded the house of Fatima (a) even if they closed it to me for war, second is that I wish I had not burned Fuja’a Sullami and instead I either had killed or released him. The third is that I wish on the Day of Saqifa, I had left the caliphate on either of these two men ‘Umar or Abu ‘Ubayda that one of them would become the caliph and I would become his minister. But the three things I did not do and wish I had: the first is that when Ash’as ibn Qays was brought to me in captivity, I wish I had struck his neck, because I suspect he will enforce evil wherever he finds it; and the other one is that I wish when I sent Khalid Bin Waleed to the battle of the apostates I had remained at Zil Qissah so that I could help the army if they were defeated; and the third one, I wish that when I delegated Khalid to Sham I had sent Omar to Iraq so that I had opened my two hands in the cause of God. Then he opened his hands and added: I wish I had asked the Prophet of God (peace be upon him) that to whom the caliphate belonged, so that nobody would go to war on it; and I wish I had asked him did Ansar have any right in this matter; and I wish I had asked him if the the brother’s daughter and the father’s sister would inherit anything [from the deceased], because I’m not sure about it. Source: Târîkh Tabarî, v 3 p 429 ; Târîkh Ya’qûbî, v 2 p 137

[@MJB0110]

Thank you for explaining the truth & the reality. From a Shia brother.

[@TheAnonYmouse]

May Allah bless you.

[@Kashmiri_Separatist]

Lol. Brother if you're a shia, you should be on Ammar's side

[@MJB0110]

@@Kashmiri_Separatist Sunni/Shia/Sufi/Salafi first & foremost, we should be seekers of truth - whatever that might be and whatever it looks like brother. This should not be tribal like a football supporter always backing their own side regardless. Aamar makes some very good points in his lecture series but there are good counters/refutations from many others too. I believe in 2 overlapping Venn Diagrams (Sunni & Shia) - somewhere close where they both overlap is where the truth sits inmho.

[@comparativereligiondailynews]

​@@MJB0110 Yes bro ❤ You are great. I also consider that Shia Islam is very Truthful and Sunni also has some faults. @ 3 April 2024

[@Kashmiri_Separatist]

@@MJB0110 Wow I never knew such honest truth seekers like you existed brother! May Allah guide us all

[@MushafMehdi1]

10:07 he says this happened after fadak, means he agrees that the incident actually happened and imam a.s was happy with abubakr whatsoever ... Just the same case as the battle between mu'awiya and imam ali a.s

[@Angelo-Rules]

Was Asma bin unais Muslim when she married Abu Jaffar? Was she Muslim when she married Abu Bakr? Was she Muslim when she married Ali?

[@mukhtar768]

I swear down he mist have paid the authorities to get his PHD. 😂 Shias and christians when it comes to the Truth they tend to forget how to speak and understand english. SubhanAllah The hadith is so clear that it was otherwise.

[@EslamNawito]

The prophet Solomon did NOT inherit his father (David) kingdom may peace & blessings be upon them, rather he asked Allah to bestow upon him Kingship that of which has no equal nor be given to one after him! Its easy for Allah to bestow his Favour on whomever asks... thus when the prophet said: وَحَدَّثَنِي ابْنُ أَبِي خَلَفٍ، حَدَّثَنَا زَكَرِيَّاءُ بْنُ عَدِيٍّ، أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ، عَنْ يُونُسَ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، عَنِ الأَعْرَجِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ "‏ لاَ نُورَثُ مَا تَرَكْنَا صَدَقَةٌ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: " We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is a charitable endowment." Sahih Muslim 1761

[@tawhidism7030]

“We do not have hairs!” ~Hasan Qadri

[@noface9375]

May Allah bless you guys for defending Islam from the rafidha.

[@mustafaal-dabagh9155]

the embarrassing part of this video is that you guys are claiming ammar is taking things out of context yet he read the whole entire hadith and explained it. Nice try saving umar and abu bakr again 😭. However, you’re books can’t defend them. You are claiming “ammar didn’t read rhe whole naration and cherry picked” which is false, he read the whole thing and proved that. Imam ali saw abu bakr and umar are hypocrites.

[@amine5761]

ok, all you said is blablbla Do you have an actual response to the response given in this video ? May Allah guide You

[@bumbaclaat1989]

So according to Shia anyone accused of treachery in this Hadith is a hypocrite, thus Ali is a hypocrite 😂😂 Congratulations Shia you played yourself once again😁

[@user-ek8fu6mv4j]

QUL LA ASALAKUM ALAYHI AJRAN ILAL MAWADATTA FIL QURBA ' SAY I ASK YOU OF NO REWARD FOR THIS MESSAGE EXCEPT YOU LOVE MY FAMILY ' CHAPTER 42 VERSE 23

[@waliullah2391]

Bu noor is back finally

[@kashifimam]

Old video unfortunately 😢

[@s.a.a.s2527]

My brothers of ahl sunnah why is this such a difficult idea for you guys? We don’t accept your Hadiths, we only use them in arguments like these to show how our narrative also makes sense when using your books. What he’s arguing is pathetic, we can take the bad from your narrations to show exactly that THE BAD. Within reliable shi’i sources the story is very much clear and doesn’t need this level of digging. BUT when Sunni Hadith writers have for centuries painted their own picture, hidden the truth and made lies then to find the truth requires digging and when we find a little sliver of truth such as the narration talkies about here we use it to understand the bigger picture and refute the made up Sunni ideal of Adaalat Al-Sahaaba. Using logic we can all understand they heavily disagreed and then coincidentally fought CIVIL WARS against each other!! If you look at real history this isn’t hard to comprehend, what is hard to comprehend is that thousands of Arabs that claimed to be Muslim were all best friends even when killing each other…

[@syedumerahmed8222]

What logic you are talking about? Which member of the honourable Ahlul bait promoted hurting one's self in Muharram? And the truth? in which books of yours do you have a correct chain of narrations leading to Prophet Muhammad PBUH? the argument you use against Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) is mentioned in various Sunni books as well, but none have an authentic chain of narration, no eyewitnesses, and it comes from a liar Aban ibn Abi Ayyash (also considered an unreliable source from Shia scholars) you use your logic here.

[@LearnAuthority.Worldwide]

So is this video refuting one argument or all of the arguments? Is there going to be a part 2??

[@mahdifalahi5900]

He has made tens of arguments in each of these ramazan lectures, the answers are limited to a few on the other side😐

[@majestic6303]

@@mahdifalahi5900….His Ramadan intention is to create more hate and animosity towards Sunni. What kind of intention this guy has to do it on Ramadan.

[@mahdifalahi5900]

@@majestic6303 I agree to some degree, but in the end muslims should be open minded and listen to others' reasoning to have an understanding of their pov and who knows, maybe we may find them more reasonable

[@LearnAuthority.Worldwide]

@@majestic6303 How? Everything he says is backed up with proof that’s hujjah

[@beyinvebeden6527]

This wbat they have in hand😂😂😂 Dont expect,just accept the reality))

[@rcmysm9123]

Still waiting, what dua did the"Caliph" after Allah's swt. Umar write to help increase the people's knowledge and faith.

[@Angelo-Rules]

A person **cannot be a true Twelver Shi’ah except if he believes that the Quran is Muharaf**! [1] While this might seem strange, what follows is even stranger. Ahl Al-Sunnah transmitted the Quran from the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] through Tawatur [2] and a multitude of widespread authentic chains. These Mushafs that are printed today, and people all over the world read from, are from one of these four narrations: 1. The narration of Hafs from ‘Asim, and this is widespread in the Arabian Gulf, Egypt, Shaam, Iraq, and Yemen. 2. The second is the narration of Warsh from Nafi’, and this is common in Morocco and Algeria. 3. The third narration is that of Qalon from Nafi’, and it is widespread in Libya. 4. The fourth is the narration of Al-Duwri from Abi ‘Amr, and this is common in Chad and the South of Sudan. In addition to these there are other narrations which are not that common among people, but are being taught in institutes and Universities. So ask [May Allah bless you, benefit you, and make you a benefit for others] … ask their scholars: Where is the Quran of Aal Al-Bayt? Where is the Mushaf which the Imams narrate and transmit from each other? Where is the chain of: Al-‘Askari from the way of Al-Hadi from Al- Jawad from Al-Ridaa form Al-Kazim from Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien (the grandson of the Prophet) or Al-Hasan (the grandson of the Prophet) from Ali [May Allah be pleased with them all]? **Did the students of these Imams narrate everything from them except the Quran**?!! Are the scholars of the Shi’ah capable of producing a chain of the Quran up to the Messenger [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household] without relying on or referring back to the chains of Ahl Al-Sunnah?!! I am definite that they are incapable of producing such a thing, so go back to them and check if they can correct me. What I think they will say to you, though, is: there is a narration, and it is the narration of Hamza Al-Zayaat from the way of Al-Sadiq from Al-Baqir from Zayn Al-‘Abideen from Al-Husien from Ali. This should raise another important question: Why is this being narrated by Hamza Al-Zayaat [3] from Al-Sadiq [4], and not by Al-Kazim [from Al-Sadiq]? And why isn’t Al-Kazim’s son: Al-Rida narrating this from him? And why isn’t Al-Jawad narrating it from Al-Rida … this is a very important point to pay attention to. Then I add to this another question to the Shi’ah: Where are your chains today to Hamza Al-Zayaat? And where is the recitation of Hamza Al-Zayaat being recited today? All the countries that the Shi’ah recite Quran in today follow: the narration of Hafs from ‘Asim, the narration of Warsh from Nafi’, the narration of Qalon from Nafi’, or the narration of Al-Duwri from Abi ‘Amr. Where is the narration of Hamza? I do not know of a Mushaf that is printed upon the narration of Hamza on this day. **If the Companions were Apostates, especially the famous ones from among them, and they were the ones that transmitted the Quran: How can a Shi’ah trust the narration of those who he believe are Apostates? This Quran that is between our hands today, is from the narration of those companions of the Prophet [May Blessings of Allah and Peace be upon him and his household], and it is the one narrated by Hafs from the way of ‘Asim from Abi ‘Abdulrahman Al-Salami from ‘Uthman and Ali and Ubi and Zayd.** **Where is the chain of the Shi’ah to Hafs or to Warsh or to Qalon or to Al-Duwri?** After answering these questions you would understand why we said that you will not be a shi’ah except if you say that the Quran had been subject to Tahreef. We add to this, that some Shi’a scholars, such as Ni’mat-u-Allah Al- Jazai’ri [5], Al-Nuri Al-Tabrasi [6] , and others proclaimed that Mutawatir narrations were transmitted from the infallible Imams stating that the Quran is Muharaf, yet you do not find even one narration from the Imams clearly stating that the Quran is free from any such Tahreef. The first to say that [the Quran is] free from Tahreef from their earlier scholars are four, they are: Al-Tabrasi Abu Ali[7], Al-Tusi[8] , Al-Murtada [9], and Al-Saduq60. As for Al-Mufeed61 he has two sayings in this matter. It follows, that all those who claim to follow the Twelve Imams should also say [as their Imams are reported to have said] that the Quran has been subject to Tahreef, since the narrations that came from the way of the Imams attested to such a thing. As for those who don’t wish to follow the Imams and choose to follow someone else, like Al-Tusi, Al-Murtada, Al-Saduq, and Al-Tabrasi then that is their matter. **For that reason you will find that the scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah are strict in this matter, and say that whoever says that the Quran is Muharaf is a Kaffir, and they clearly declare such a thing based on what Allah the Exalted said: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian}Hijr 15:9 .** The scholars of the Shi’ah, on the other hand, do not say that, rather they just say that he who says such a thing is just mistaken. Many times we hear of a narration called “Hadith Al-Thaqalayn”, and the Thaqalayn as is known are: The Book of Allah, and Aal Al- Bayt. This tradition, which came in the Shiah books, state that the Quran is the Major [Thiql], and Aal Al-Bayt is the minor Thiql. So after this we say: Don’t all the scholars of the Shi’ah with no exception, say that the killers of Al-Husien [May Allah be pleased with him] are Apostates, since Al-Husien [May Allah be pleased with him] is a member of the minor Thiql, thus his killers are Apostates due to their attack on a member of the minor Thiql, based on this tradition. Yet they do not accuse any of those who attack the major Thiql, the Quran, of any of that?! For that reason a huge number … yes a huge number … from the big Shi’ah scholars said that the Quran is Muharaf. So do you accept these [scholars] as the symbols and heads of the Mazhab you are attributed to? [These are the scholars] whom you ask Allah to bestow his Mercy on, and whom you highly praise the knowledge and books they left behind. Do you know, May Allah Bless you, that Husien Al-Nuri Al- Tabrasi 13 said that the Noble Quran has ridiculous, silly verses (I ask refuge in Allah for me and you from such Apostasy)! I ask you: Is he after saying that a Muslim?! What he said can be found in his evil book: “Fasl Al-Khitab Fee Ithbaat Tahreef Kitab Rab Al-Arbab” . Go ask Shia scholars, ask them about the status of that man among the scholars of the Twelver Shiahs. If we do not stand up to defend the Quran, and we do not show animosity towards those who disrespect it, and do not free ourselves from those who attack it, then By Allah how can our Islam remain correct. Push Shia scholars, May Allah bless you, to declare all those who slander and attack the Quran as non Muslims, in the same way as they openly declare the Apostasy of the Nawasib [12] [May Allah curse them], even though the Nawasib showed animosity to humans i.e. the household of the Prophet. Why then don’t the Shiah scholars also declare as Apostates and curse those who show animosity or attack the Book of Allah the Exalted. As for us Ahl Al-Sunnah, we Praise Allah, who has guided us to the path where we do not distinguish between those who attack the Book of Allah, or the Household of the Messenger, or his Companions. We have one Manhaj in defending all that which is revered in this Religion. We show animosity and free ourselves from all those who attack the Book of Allah, rather we declare him as an Apostate, and we hate and free ourselves from all those who slander and attack the household of the Messenger [Blessings and Peace of Allah be upon him and his household] or the companions of our Prophet [Blessings of Allah and Peace upon him]. I know you will tell me the nonsense about the burning, the goat & ibn umar like atheists do. You do realise the Qur'an is an oral tradition, don't you. If you can't accept this then I am afraid you have to become Sunni because the earliest traditions are Sunni. The earliest Hadith books are Sunni. The earliest Fiqh books are Sunni. The earliest 'Aqidah books are Sunni. The earliest Sirah books are Sunni. These were written several hundred years before Shiite books were written. Study and read the earliest books, and you will gain a good understanding

[@Angelo-Rules]

This is the most unbiased source: the Qur'an! If you find verses in the Quran that indicate it is permissible to worship Ahl al-Bayt, that it is permissible to label the Prophet's companions as disbelievers or hypocrites, that Ahl al-Bayt possess knowledge of the unseen ('Ilm al-Ghayb), that Ahl al-Bayt are superior to all Prophets and Messengers, that one should physically harm and torture oneself during al-Muharram, that one should visit graves and call upon the deceased, that seeking help from imams and people instead of Allah is recommended, that the Qur'an is not preserved, that al-Mahdi is hiding in a cave and being alive, and similar beliefs, then you can remain Shi'i. If you don't find such verses, then becoming muslim is a better way. Read the Qur'an and revisit, my friend.

[@Angelo-Rules]

Destroying Shias Saying the Imams have a share in Allaah's Lordship. See Al-Kaafi (1/409), Bihaar al-Anwaar (47/137).Imams are essentially treated like God: as al-Kafi (1/409) with the chapter heading, "The earth and the heavens belong to the imams", this is associating the ownership of all creation which is solely for Allaah with the imams. (2) Saying the Imams have share in Allaah's Divinity. See Bihaar al-Anwaar (23/364, 27/167), Tafseer al-Qumee (2/251,256), Usool al-Kaafi (1/421, 437), Al-Amalee (pg. 292-293). (3) Saying the Imams have a share in Allaah's Names and Attributes. Reference: Bihaar al-Anwaar (26/27-28), Al-Kaafi (1/261, 148). (4) Saying the Quraan is distorted and altered (as per the majority of their scholars). See Tafseer al-Qumee (1/5-10), al-Kaafi (2/634), Maraaqatul 'Uqool (2/563) (5) Saying the Quraan is created. See Bihaar al-Anwaar (92/117-121), A'yaan ash-Shi'ah (1/461). (6) The status of their Imams is greater than of the prophets. See Bihaar al-Anwaar (25/352), Al-Hukoomah al-Islamiyyah (pg. 52) (7) The majority of the companions are apostates, disbelievers, and hypocrites. See Ihqaaq al-Haqq (pg. 316), As-Sab'ah min as-Salaf (pg. 7). This point destroys Twelver religion as it was explained in the comment about Tahreef. (8) Imams are essentially treated like God: as al-Kafi (1/409) with the chapter heading, "The earth and the heavens belong to the imams", this is associating the ownership of all creation which is solely for Allaah with the imams. In Bihaar al-Anwar (47/139), Majlisi narrates that that a dead person by the name of Ahmad is raised up by the "permission of Allaah as the permission of Jafar". And Khomeini in al-Hukoomat al-Islamiyyah pg. 52 where he declared the imams control the atoms of the universe. It is also in these same books that we find that verses which mostly speak about shirk and tawheed are compared to wilayah of Ali saying whoever rejects his wilayah is a polytheist, not even caring that these commands of tawheed and refrain from shirk are associated with Allaah, not any wilayah. See Bihar al-Anwar (23/364), Tafseer al-Qumi (2/256). Khomeini in Kashf al-Asrar pg.49 says they seem assistance from sanctified souls, the imams and prophets "to whom Allaah gave the permission to assist." This is identical to the claims of the Quraysh of Makkah who said their idols had permission from Allaah to assist them and it is through these idols they sought closeness to Allaah. See Bihar al-Anwar (94/33) where you invoke different Imams for different things. Ali ibn al-Hasan gives safety to rulers, Muhammad ibn Ali and Jafar ibn Muhammad, they help with the hereafter, Moosa ibn Ali helps with security from Allaah, Hasan ibn Ali gives security on the day of judgement. Al-Kulayni in al-Kafi (1/409), "Chapter: The entire earth belongs to the imam", he narrates from Abu Abdullah that he said, "Do you not know that this world and the next life (both) belong to the imam? He distributes it wherever he wills and he gives it to whom he wills." Al-Khomeini said in Al-Hukoomah al-Islamiyyah (pg. 52), "Verily the Imam has a praiseworthy station, a special rank and universal caliphate which is given due to its wilayah by which they rule over all the molecules in the universe." Their imams were allegedly narrated saying “They are the covers of Allaah, the means between Him and His creation” and Al Majlisi narrated in his book a chapter “The people are not guided without the imams, and they are the means of worship between creatures and Allaah, and only those that enter Jannah are the ones who know them. See Bihaar al-Anwar (23/97) It is also narrated from al-Majlisi in Bihaar al-Anwar (29/94), "If you have a need for Allaah the most blessed most exalted, write it on a piece of paper set on the blessings of Allaah; and put it on a grave of the graves of the imams if you want, or bury it and seal it, or bake some clean clay and put the paper inside of it, and throw it in a running river, or a deep well, or a rill of water, because it indeed reaches the master peace be upon him, and he will suffice you in what you need aid in, himself." They said that Ali ibn al-Hasan provides safety from rulers and blowings of the devil, Muhammad ibn Ali and Ja'far ibn Muhammad are for asking for the Hereafter and give one hope for it, Moosa ibn Ja'far gives security, Ali ibn Moosa gives safety in the seas, Muhammad ibn Ali gives provisions and some others. See Bihaar al-Anwar (94/33)

[@Angelo-Rules]

Waseela is the same belief of the Quraysh of Makkah was that they 'prayed' to Allaah through their idols, Allaah said which means, "Unquestionably, for Allah is the pure religion. And those who take protectors besides Him [say], "We only worship them that they may bring us nearer to Allah in position." Indeed, Allah will judge between them concerning that over which they differ. Indeed, Allah does not guide he who is a liar and [confirmed] disbeliever." 39:3 And He said which means, "And do not invoke besides Allah that which neither benefits you nor harms you, for if you did, then indeed you would be of the wrongdoers.'" 10:106 .

[@rcmysm9123]

@@Angelo-Rules Did Abu Bakr name a successor?

[@Myname11241]

Guys , i wonder why this salafi channel featured all 12 shia imams on this channel by name and still putting doubts in mind of masses . Per shia belief- our imams are top in knowledge, bravery, perseverance etc in their era and that is enough for any one to know the imam of their time. It is so low on farid behalf that imams were after money when nobody in the history has put any finger on the character of any of them .

[@deadsheep404]

Per Shia beliefs your imams are cowards who let their wives get beaten up in front of them, and then run and hide in a basement for 1300 years

[@jaleel42]

They have zero shame 😮

[@MushafMehdi1]

19:46 heres another one you still agree that abubakr and umer took the fadak, but you know ali a.s should have taken it back when he came into power... but what about the sufferings of fatima salamullahialaiha

[@Angelo-Rules]

You believe in that bedtime story 😂 Even shia scholars said it is fabrication

[@MushafMehdi1]

@@Angelo-Rules read your own books... that person accepts that anyway

[@theimdad1]

It seems there is clearly disputes among companions. I wonder why?

[@EntropicEngineers]

Ali is not all seeing or all hearing astagfirullah you're lying about the shias

[@ibrahimaziz2365]

No one said all hearing all seeing but you believe he has knowledge of the unseen.

[@EntropicEngineers]

@ibrahimaziz2365 Knowledge of the unseen does not mean the complete knowledge that Allah possesses. I can say I have knowledge of the unseen because I know chemistry but I don't know everything similarly Ali etc were the same.

[@TheFaro2011]

Errrr if he's an imam for you which your sect believes are inflallible, then that's what you believe about him. It's a big part of 12er, maybe you don't,but definitely see your big ones propagate it

[@HajjiJesus]

​@EntropicEngineers Imams, according to Shia, believe or knowledge and control of kawn like the one holding coin and flipping side to side. Looks like you don't have knowledge.

[@TheFaro2011]

​@@EntropicEngineersknowledge of the unseen?! Get a grip. You guys really contradict yourself, in your tall tales of how Fatima was supposedly attacked, how did he not know? How does your version of Ali RA become so weak?!

[@fawwazabdulnasir9670]

I miss Bu Noor

[@TheCuriousMind631]

Who dishonest Prophet SAWW, and you are defending them? They eaten all Ahlul Bayt’s rights and you are defending them? Brother Huh!!!!

[@HajjiJesus]

Take a shower from hate, then watch the video. Ahlul bayt married and melted within companions and their children. None ever married so called Shia or had his children married from them. If you disagree, bring just one example.

[@nimagougol8781]

You made it worse, showing how Abbas viewed Ali (peace upon), man konto mollaho fahaza Alioyn mollaho

[@user-zu9xk6mu1d]

No actually its only "bad" for you because this shows that the sahabas were mere humans after all who had disagreements even among the ahl al bayt sahabis and sometimes they commit transgression against one another not infallibile effeminate persian superhumans,Also your fake gahdeer "bayah" (which you use sunni sources for it that you think are lying everytime its convieniant for u) was debunked many times including this channel no evidence of divine imamah no evidence of emam e zamon dajjal who'se hiding in a basement 😢

[@rcmysm9123]

​@@user-zu9xk6mu1d Show one example from Quran where someone besides Allah swt. chooses His representatives. Go!

[@yourfriends]

@@rcmysm9123 you have to reply to my question where in the Quran does it say we need a representative

[@rcmysm9123]

@@yourfriends Non responsive

[@rcmysm9123]

@@yourfriends As always

[@eRn9912]

lol @ this AI response

[@lan8346]

Shias in comment section didn't even watch video

[@mhmd1854]

I follow Imam Ali that called abu bakr and Umar, kazeban, Atheman, Ghaderan, kha2enan

[@modular7even717]

Imagine trying to follow Islam, and you have a deep rooted hatred that you have at the same time, you will never be at peace...

[@altamashbaibars9477]

It doesn't matter Ali was wrong

[@mhmd1854]

@@altamashbaibars9477 According to who he was wrong Definitely not the prophet as he said, Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali Majma' az-Zawa'ed by Al-, Haythami Masnad abi Yu'la Kanz Al-Aumal by Al-Mutaqi Al-Hindi ithaf Al-khirah Al-Maharah by Al-Bwsiri Tarikh dimashq by ibn Asaker So Imam Ali is always truthful never wrong, thus what he thought of your leaders is the truth But also according to you all sahabah are good and used yo love each other why Ali would insult abu bakr and Umar by these words which are the signs of hypocrisy, in any way your beliefs won't stand

[@altamashbaibars9477]

@@mhmd1854 all those statements are from weak hadith

[@mhmd1854]

@@altamashbaibars9477 Weak cz you said so I brought reference you brought nothing, you claimed they are weak bring your evidence

[@MushafMehdi1]

Atleast prove us that Abubakr was chosen by allah and the prophet not by Saqifa... and your stupidity on fidaq saying cherry picking hhh .... what about this thing.. is this cherry picking too.......According to Sunnite historical sources, in the last moments of Abu Bakr’s life, ‘Abd al-Rahman told him: “…you have always been righteous and a reformer, [so] do not be upset for anything in this world.” And Abu Bakr answered, “Yes, I am not upset for anything in this world, except three things I have done and I wish I had not done them and three things I have not done and I wish I had done them and three things I wish I had asked the Prophet (s). But what I wish I had not done, first is that I wish I had not invaded the house of Fatima (a) even if they closed it to me for war, second is that I wish I had not burned Fuja’a Sullami and instead I either had killed or released him. The third is that I wish on the Day of Saqifa, I had left the caliphate on either of these two men ‘Umar or Abu ‘Ubayda that one of them would become the caliph and I would become his minister. But the three things I did not do and wish I had: the first is that when Ash’as ibn Qays was brought to me in captivity, I wish I had struck his neck, because I suspect he will enforce evil wherever he finds it; and the other one is that I wish when I sent Khalid Bin Waleed to the battle of the apostates I had remained at Zil Qissah so that I could help the army if they were defeated; and the third one, I wish that when I delegated Khalid to Sham I had sent Omar to Iraq so that I had opened my two hands in the cause of God. Then he opened his hands and added: I wish I had asked the Prophet of God (peace be upon him) that to whom the caliphate belonged, so that nobody would go to war on it; and I wish I had asked him did Ansar have any right in this matter; and I wish I had asked him if the the brother’s daughter and the father’s sister would inherit anything [from the deceased], because I’m not sure about it. Source: Târîkh Tabarî, v 3 p 429 ; Târîkh Ya’qûbî, v 2 p 137

[@Angelo-Rules]

Send me your email and I will explain saqifa to you

[@AMuslim_____177]

Do you know the isnad of this hadith? Why you take hadith from books that are not in sihah sittah? You people always believe in fabricated hadith because ur hearts are filled with hatred from birth about the companions of the Prophet ( SAW ) . Remove hatred from heart and then u will understand what true islam is. I hope u might read this with open heart. Why do u curse sahaba's (R.A). You have ur own deeds that will benefit u on the day of judgement. Do as Ali (R.A) did. He followed Prophet (SAW) so you should follow Sunnah as well. Prophet Never Cursed anyone nor did Ali ( R.A ). As a Sunni We love ahlul bait (R.A ) more than our lives. Just think about it for once that u cannot curse even the kafir and u r cursing the companions of Prophet (SAW) who were loved by Ali (R.A) that he named his sons with their names. Abu bakr, Umar and Usman. If you say they were famous names that's why Ali (R.A) named them then Abu Bakr was not a name but was kunya. Abu Bakr name was Abdullah bin Abi Quahafah. Please Save yourself and others from doing this sinful things.

[@mahdifalahi5900]

I thought youre gonna bring something to refute the whole argument! All I see are excuses

[@LadooCrew]

Why don't you and your scholars ever counter reply to these so called excuses Shiasm got hit for six out of the stadium. Delusional thoughts need no reply.

[@tayamkay]

If you cannot see the glass clear refutation maybe check your eyesight. Here they are listed again, and if you're honest to yourself, you must confront them: 1. Abbas and Ali had a dispute, and in order to resolve it they consult Umar (says enough already) 2. Abbas calls Umar Ameer al Mu'mineen 3. Abbas calls Ali a treacherous cheating sinful liar 4. Umar reprimands Abbas for using such harsh language by saying if you call Ali these things because you disagree, you would also call Abu Bake and me the same things since we disagreed with you.

[@mahdifalahi5900]

@@tayamkay well you just confirmed there was a disagreement between ali and abubaker/omar. Since the truth is with ali and ali is truth, abubakr and umar were sinners, liers, betryers etc at least in the fadak occasion. You are more than welcome to the pure path of islam!

[@LadooCrew]

@@tayamkay some people can ot be reasoned with rafidhis are intoxicated in there fake love

[@zedispahany7317]

@@mahdifalahi5900 What pure Islam are u talking about????Definitely not the islam of Prophet Mohammad who the Quran speaks of as rahmatul aalameen. Hazrat Ali and his progeny also followed in his footsteps. That is the basic of his aqlaq in the quran. Anyone who promotes hatred is not the religion to follow.

[@Eggwrath]

This refutation seems kind of weak. In the narration, even if Omar was saying it figuratively, using the same words that Abbas used against Ali, it shows that Ali disagreed with both the first two caliphs on some major level, whether the narrations are there or not. For 200 years Ali and his sons were killed, I wonder how many thousands of narrations of truth didn’t make it into the books? Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali As a Shia, I don’t curse anyone. It’s prohibited by the 12 imams. BUT - critically, you have to use your rationale and recognize who I should take my religion from. This is why I choose Ahlulbayt and the sahaba and wives that were loyal to them, not just any sahaba and not just any wives. We whitewash history too much. Sounds like a fairy tale

[@Numeral0]

you can't take some of the wives and leave the rest out, cause they are all called the mothers of the believers, and sunni or shia'a we all love and respect the prophet and the ahlulbyt, we all just need to be best in Islam and never worship anything but Allah

[@Eggwrath]

@@Numeral0 they are ALL mothers of the believers. This is correct, I believe the Quran states so. However, they do not all have the same qualifications of religious leadership Since they’re mothers of the believers, we’re not allowed to curse or say XYZ is going to hell. But in terms of who teaches me Islam, that position isn’t open to just anyone This is the Shia view (ignore the ignorant ones who are extreme)

[@akari678]

Shows that you did not pay attention. May Allah guide you. I'd ali disagreed with them, then why didn't he take back fadak when he got the khalifa? Walahi, you people are not sincere.

[@Eggwrath]

@@Numeral0 As far as respect/love The Ahlulbayt have a special status. Loving Ahlulbayt is following Ahlulbayt. It’s difficult to love Prophet Muhammad and not follow him, correct? So if we say we love Ahlulbayt, we have to see what they actually taught, because this is likely to be the correct version of Islam to the best of our knowledge (Hadith of the Two Weighty Things from Sahih Muslim and all Shia books). The Ahlulbayt are the most reliable source of the true Sunnah of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. As a Shia for example, I see Hadiths of Ali and Muhammad (SAW) crying over the death of Hussein YEARS before it happened. So I follow But I don’t see them hitting themselves with chains or drawing pictures. So I don’t do that. You get me? This is the correct Shia view, even though there are ignorant Shias who do weird stuff. We have to follow what Ahlulbayt actually said not what some ignorant Shia does in Iraq That’s how we have a fair discussion. It’s not fair to judge Sunnis just because all suicide bombers are Sunni. Likewise, not fair to judge Shias because of people doing ignorant stuff.

[@rcmysm9123]

​@@Numeral0 You cannot love the Alhul Bayt and also those that usurped, fought, cursed, abused and killed them, it's that simple.

[@LadooCrew]

Shukar alhumdulilah for my lord showing me the lies deception and kufr of shiaism that I was able to throw it against the wall.

[@bolaelegbede7843]

Amman is dumb and dubious.

[@theimdad1]

I am from Sunni tradition, but I can’t deny Ammar’s evidences that he presented. The facts are clear to me.

[@studentofpain6801]

You’re not a sunni… next time make sure you’re not subscribed to a channel called “imam hussein tv” ;)

[@Adam-iz5kh]

​@studentofpain6801 Just because he is subscribed to that channel does not mean he isn't a Sunni. Maybe he subscribed because he wants to learn about Shiism.

[@beyinvebeden6527]

​@@studentofpain6801 in your understanding sunni is a guy who is very good at denying😂

[@studentofpain6801]

@@Adam-iz5kh yes, so believable 🤣

[@studentofpain6801]

@@beyinvebeden6527 I wonder why it’s always shias feeling the need to act as undercover sunnis. Desperate is and understatement ig💀

[@Aman_Hanbali]

Do you know who’s making this Guy famous?? It’s this channel doing favor for this irrelevant guy.

[@HajjiJesus]

I don't think so. He is famous in Shia circles. This channel rebut the doubts used by Shia Ayyatullahs for their laymen and ignorant Muslims.

[@See773]

It does not refute anything. It only highlight the wrong stand and decision of Abubakr. He is a liar, cheater, treacherous, sinful.

[@TheFaro2011]

Lol, Ali RA named his son after Abu Bakr (a kuniyah) thus highlighting his reverence for Abu Bakr and he'd never let you speak like this, but look at how you conduct yourself

[@mhmd1854]

​@@TheFaro2011 That's a lie bring the evidence that Imam Ali called his son abu bakr for the love of your abu bakr

[@Burna1009]

@@mhmd1854there was no one before Abu Bakr RA with the same name, neither was it a common name amongst the Arabs. Abu Bakr is a name specific to him and we have many narrations where Abu Bakr and Imam Ali AS showed loved to each other.

[@tayamkay]

it does not refute anything that Abbas called Ali a treacherous, cheating, sinful liar and Umar Amir al Mu'mineen? That doesn't change the context of the narration for you whatsoever? It doesn't change for you that when Abbas and Ali have a dispute they go to Umar to resolve it?

[@mhmd1854]

@@Burna1009 Firstly abu bakr isn't his name it's a kunya, do you even know his true name Secondly, abu bakr was a common nickname to the Arabs and it means the youth of the camel Thirdly the son of Imam Ali who was nicknamed abu bakr was named Muhammad and was 2 years old when his father died, were is the proof that Imam Ali called him abu bakr for the love of your abu bakr Fourthly, Imam Ali said explicitly that he named his son Uthman for the great sahabi Uthman bn maz'on, Fifthly the conflict that happened between Imam Ali and your leaders is proven in history by all accounts, so claiming that they loved each other is ridiculous trying desperately to prove it by names, well were the names of Ali, Hasan and Husayn in your leader's sons if that's your proof of love, didn't they love them back? The narrations that claim that they loved each other are fabricated, but sometimes the truth slip through, like the hadith mentioned in the video showing what Imam Ali thought of your leaders, you can't have it both ways

[@bitterlifes]

Typical rafidah lies!

[@averagegamerz4157]

Lol y do i have to accept the whole narration? Again these are ur holy books not ours..as if ima believe Imam Ali went to umar to resolve anything..we only point that part out were umar says what Imam Ali believed abu bakr to be..a liar etc etc.. to prove that in ur books our beliefs are found...y u feel i have to accept the whole narration is beyond me..not sure whether to laugh or cry at such a weak rebuttal

[@altamashbaibars9477]

Ali cant be right everytime. Abbas called ali a liar. Ali in the same hadith accepted his mistake.

[@beyinvebeden6527]

How can you say that Ali cant be right every time?? Ali was the one chosen by Prohohet (s.a.a.s)on the day of Mubahala as the one who is Prophet's Nafs(himself). If Ali is called the Nafs of Propbet,then Ali was right everytime,like Prophet was right eveey time.

[@altamashbaibars9477]

​@@beyinvebeden6527chosen by prophet doesn't mean he will always be right

[@user-ek8fu6mv4j]

@altamashbaibars9477 YO YOU EITHER IGNORANT OR A MUNAFIQ RASULULLAAH SAWAS IMAM ALI FATIMA LEADER OF ALL WOMEN OF THE UNIVERSE AND IMAM HASSAN AND IMAM HUSSAYN ARE ALWAYS RIGHT THEY ARE THE PARTY OF ALLAAH NOT HIZBUSH SHAYTAAN LEARN YOUR DEEN BY READING IQRA IQRA IQRA OR KEEP SILENT