REVEALED: INSIDE NEW AIR FORCE ONE That Flies at 5 Times Speed of Sound

Discover the groundbreaking advancements of the new Air Force One in our latest video! We delve deep into the remarkable transformation of the iconic presidential aircraft, Boeing's 747-8, showcasing its ultra-modern design, enhanced security features, and unprecedented speed capabilities.
**𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀, 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽, 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼:
𝗡𝗮𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗬𝗧@𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹.𝗰𝗼𝗺
Nauctis is the ultimate hub for maritime, technology, transportation, and military enthusiasts.
We release new videos every day on our KZbin channel, Don't miss out on any of our updates - subscribe to our channel and Follow our Social Media to explore additional content.
We request you to maintain a respectful and constructive tone in the comments section. Any spam, insults, or trolling will not be tolerated and will be promptly deleted. Join us on our journey to discover the wonders of the sea, Technology, Transportation and Military!

[@orlandocabrera2107]

Way too many inaccuracies in this video to count.

[@wstowe747]

You are absolutely right. I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it. Speed increased 5 times !?! Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?

[@user-vu9ry2fm2q]

At 9 minutes, he is talking about FDR while showing a picture of Gerald Ford.

[@larrybe2900]

@@user-vu9ry2fm2q And couldn't find a photo of Nixon either.

[@jerrycallender-qm7zr]

Mrs. Kennedy's color scheme is STILL an elegant design.

[@itgoestoeleven]

Mrs. Kennedy persueded her friend, Raymond Lowey, to design the livery for the Boeing 707 that was used to transport the president.

[@jerrycallender-qm7zr]

@@itgoestoeleven ...as mentioned above.

[@arleighj7053]

You would think that refueling in the air would be a MUST in case of emergency

[@davidmccartney3433]

NOT ONE WORD about a supersonic Airforce One. I really hate these KZbinrs that have grossly misleading titles.

[@101bennyc]

So much click bait, I’m blocking this channel

[@jefife750]

I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about KZbin. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!

[@overlord5580]

False and misleading

[@gtbproductions1]

THATS WHY I GAVE HIM A THUMBS DOWN 👎

[@ME-bw3rl]

grounds for murder

[@michaelkoscec4113]

Totally agree regarding bogus headlines that have nothing to do with the actual content.

[@zxatl2003]

Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!

[@amurtigress_mobile365]

Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....

[@jeffscott6656]

The picture looks like a modified L1011

[@timvaldez6537]

They don't even proof their historical photos.

[@janetceniza8091]

My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane. No info given to mom but still proud of his work.

[@jeffscott6656]

😢

[@LikeSpee]

I hate to break this to you janet, but he's really a drug trafficker. Its hard to get out...

[@paulfiore7083]

Please tell him to check the bolts

[@janetceniza8091]

His job is quality control on the parts, works on the computer only as lead Engr. Only blisters on his finger tips.@@paulfiore7083

[@brentbarnhart5827]

Congratulations Janet, that is quite something to be proud of. (I am an engineer, albeit, not an aircraft engineer.)

[@exposingthedarknesswiththe9190]

It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍

[@oldchuckie1874]

The third AF one, the doomsday aircraft does have that feature. I’ve seen it at then Patrick AFB

[@ebnolan3856]

I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.

[@LikeSpee]

Unconscable huh 🤔Did you make that up on the fly 😂

[@BobbyTucker]

@@LikeSpee, You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.

[@ebnolan3856]

@@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.

[@davescott7669]

The plane is only "air force one" when the President is on board

[@ebnolan3856]

Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use. Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.

[@Cazador60140]

A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd

[@mikelee7318]

What I was thinking. No way it can fly that fast.

[@tscotom]

clickbait !

[@Eclipse-ss7ko]

I think that the narrator said 5 X the old plane. No inflight refueling is BS I do not know how the air force could allow that.

[@trains4one]

You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.

[@jaydee4009]

I bet it won't even go 4 times the speed of sound!

[@dustinchase9187]

The title is a lie. Lies get thumbs down.

[@slobodanfemic4481]

B-747 beautiful plane ever !

[@kyosanim9581]

AtA refueling seems very significant to omit!

[@Wayne-gb5pu]

My Man,, When You Say The Colors Of Our Flag,, Never Say,, WHITE RED BLUE... IT'S. """RED WHITE BLUE """...YOU GOT THAT...PAL!!!

[@johnlicht9151]

Shifty Convict Clown 🤡 speech.

[@ebnolan3856]

Amen! Red is always on top!

[@davidlauder-qi5zv]

And the colours of the British flag are also red, white and blue. You got that, pal?

[@ebnolan3856]

@@davidlauder-qi5zv 👏🏼

[@davidlauder-qi5zv]

@@ebnolan3856 Meaning you didn't know?

[@jaydee4009]

Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?

[@charlescarmichael1124]

Apparently according to BETTER videos, it is pretty difficult to retrofit the 800's and they apparently have never used it. Even on 9/11.

[@larrybe2900]

@@charlescarmichael1124 Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.

[@michaelcolley1324]

The new AF1 is only going to cost 5.3 billion dollars, but the generator upgrade is 22 billion. Don't you mean 22 million, and not billion?

[@michaelloder6159]

Bunch of BS No Generator cost 22 million dollars .. maybe $200,000 at the most!! For a generator!!

[@BobbyTucker]

The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...

[@ebnolan3856]

The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion. The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website. There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis. It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.

[@stuuuporman]

I like the current paint job. Looks Presidential, but understated. No need for red. However, I am wondering about no air to air refueling.

[@ebnolan3856]

There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.

[@marvinisit]

Just a simple FYI....lol Technically, “Air Force One” is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the President.

[@stuuuporman]

at the moment

[@ebnolan3856]

You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.

[@BobbyTucker]

@@ebnolan3856, There is an SR-71 that can handle two human beings also.

[@ebnolan3856]

Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.

[@jackmeriustacktheritrix1114]

Hypersonic 747 that would be some feat 😂😂😂😂

[@carlmassey8837]

Just wondering if that elevator and wheelchair is meant for JB..

[@mohammedali808]

This is a very worrying situation where it CANNOT BE REFUELLED IN MID AIR. This a DOWNGRADE.

[@butchs6099]

JRB needs a wheel chair ramp but at this stage of the game maybe just shove him out and before it lands.

[@BobbyTucker]

ROTFLMAO!!! Go fer' it!

[@perryfarmer3280]

There is one bozo every day and today you are the one.

[@gjurczyc]

Great plane but as someone said already impossible to fly 5X the speed of sound.

[@2hcobda2]

Mach 5 Hypersonic Faster than SR-71 Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range -- must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability

[@CoolDave-tc7hb]

I like the new Air Force One is really Cool. 😎 I’m not sure 🤔 why nobody like the new Air Force One plane. It’s more like a presidential aircraft.

[@PedroG-xh6lh]

I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟

[@paulfiore7083]

Unbelievable. I thought we didn't want a King anymore? When it's not your money it's so easy to get extravagant

[@TKO67]

would love to get a tour one day

[@klassyedward9718]

Wow, Super aircraft.

[@timvaldez6537]

Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.

[@oxcart4172]

Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"

[@timothylaws4549]

inside looks like Star Trek

[@user-lt3pj7bc8f]

Now that is how the Prez is suppose to fly

[@Sauce-Money19]

Gonna Need It😂

[@curtc4918]

22 billion for the engines? Don't think so.

[@davedunn4285]

I love how Donald Trump is updating the color scheme a reflection of JFK God Bless America

[@jamesroe4968]

Make sure to brief Harrison Ford, you know, just in case.😂

[@forestsantos9828]

Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4

[@brandonspaulding8097]

Everything on the internet is 100% true man! EVERYTHING! Even information about top secret airplanes man!

[@dalesaylors9251]

The damn ring looks like a fighter jet.

[@ronniepowell3000]

You showed a picture of Gerald R. Ford when talking about 1st president to fly on Air Force 1 was FDR.

[@Jaystarzgaming]

If stuff becomes reality no one has any right to refuse it’s existence.

[@dipaknadkarni62]

Cool.

[@randolphgarcia3494]

BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.

[@metubyaj7675]

It is important to have intercept missiles with the air plane in case enemy launches missile to the plane.

[@topgunfurry]

I know later in the future there’s going to be a supersonic Air Force 1 because the future is coming!!!

[@johnfranklin5277]

Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.

[@RWGish]

If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling. The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.

[@timvaldez6537]

The second time you mention President Eisenhower you show a photo from October 16, 1958 - First Lady Mamie Eisenhower and Pan Am Chairman Juan Trippe. The Boeing 707-121, the plane that inaugurated the commercial jet age for the United States with its flight from New York to Paris. President Eisenhower is not in the photo.

[@timstewart9026]

Given recent events, does Boeing guaranty the doors and wheels will stay on?

[@themister3865]

Why will not include the air-to-air refueling capability? I would think that function would be a given.

[@falconquest2068]

Does this employ the anti-door fall off technology?

[@gtbproductions1]

$22 BILLION DOLLAR ENGINES???😂😂😂

[@2hcobda2]

But no $1K "turlet" seats, because gold plating costs more than that

[@Homoprimatesapiens]

Is their provision for extra pilots and their comfort, or are the two pilots suppose to pilot the aircraft for days in a cramped space.

[@2hcobda2]

Autopilots from the movie "Airplane" earned their "Stripes" there. A 747 is shown crashing into the airport terminal near the end of the movie.

[@B-rian937]

I would really like to see how the landing gear on the illustration works. 😂

[@melheinrich5438]

Isn't anyone thinking about a smaller airforce one for all those short hoops too saving money?

[@craigr.h.laurent240]

Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."

[@johnwoodall3791]

Just when i thought i have seen everything. Nice Video.

[@raymondharris900]

How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?

[@baron2323]

on the 4:minute 55 sec said that the engines will cost 22 billion WTF..how much the entire plane will cost then?

[@donaldboyer8182]

What happens to them when they are replaced? Scrapped?

[@MrJ-dc3yz]

Can't refuel? Will the doors stay on?

[@d.powers3428]

Well, it definitely looks like something presidential. Or at least suitable for a dictator for a day.😅

[@The101stEagle]

Kinda wowed about 1.8 mach.

[@frozenflyify]

Air the airstairs foolproof ?

[@spaceace1006]

The new Air Force 1 will be a fully refitted Constitution Class Starship with Landing Capability! She will include 4 Danube Class Runabouts and 8 Wedge Fighters! 😁

[@safetychuck2]

I bet it would be 5 times as expensive as any Air Force One before too.

[@user-ik1sc3fj9n]

🎉😊😊 yes like it

[@markhilla5401]

Hopefully it has a ejection seat

[@PeterNGloor]

what a strange title???

[@ernestyeagley512]

Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.

[@davidd1395]

Oddly enough EMP is how they took out Senator Wellstone.

[@davids8493]

How far are they behind schedule on this? They probably won't finish it because of their financial and safety problems. IMHO.

[@kimseymour8896]

No mid air refueling? What are they thinking ? That’s absolutely foolish ! They have to have refueling in flight. That’s a cover your butt maneuver !

[@miztrusa]

There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.

[@buntoonraksapao9554]

Put two more engines on the wings. Make it seven engines model.

[@formerice]

Figured it would be solar powered, hehe.

[@2hcobda2]

kamala sas yes & you can see moon craters with your own eyes

[@glenkellner9936]

Um someone doesn’t know the difference between FDR and Gerald Ford?

[@tahititoutou3802]

I need not see the video to understand it is a hoax! If THAT structure is hypersonic, then the Ford model T is a race car!

[@forexed8948]

Air Force One is the president's callsign.

[@markhillary7402]

So politicians can get ahead of thier own lies?

[@marcosavila8215]

5x the speed of sound?? seriously? wow

[@jetli740]

yes it can fly at that speed in nose dive on full power

[@cruzin6123]

5 times the speed of sound? Year, right.....

[@MrJeepCanada]

I hate click bate I wanted to see Air Force one look like the thumb nail lol

[@rapidcars1]

The plane should reflect the colors of the flag. The blue should be darker like on the flag.

[@internationalsolartech]

I did not hear one single word about the Mach 5 Air Force One....Did anyone else?

[@Dr4gonWarrior]

Where is the five times speed of sound?

[@rickrybacki4145]

You must believe Donald Dump is king too

[@hans-peterleemann9253]

what a jock

[@charlesroer972]

Ask the judge if too pricy ?

[@MrJ-dc3yz]

I don't know if Boeing should make AirForce 1 Something might fall off.

[@charlesjohnson4492]

Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views. Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?

[@frankcherry3810]

Its called Bait and Switch

[@TermitesRGood1]

when the President steps on any plane be it Commercial say for 20 minutes they change the Call-sign to that plane then change it back after the President leaves the aircraft........

[@brentsummers7377]

OMG! If Biden had one of those planes he'd be taking 3 day weekends on the beaches of Italy and Greece instead of Delaware😂

[@davidmembril9576]

And I wouldn't blame him...

[@justinthomas2538]

Its RED WHITE and BLUE. In that order only. Thank you! USA!

[@hermis2008]

I do not believe for a second the engines cost 22 billion dollars as stated in the video. That sounds ridiculous to me.

[@research903]

Click Bait...

[@AngelAdrian-sk3fy]

This is real or fake

[@orvjudd1383]

No 747 flying is capable of flying even close to Mach1 , this statement is BS

[@IndigenousAmericanTrucker]

Hmmmm! So, they are going backwards, I see! The current Air Force One can refuel in mid air, but the new one won't be able to. How much sense does that make? How would the President be able to stay in the air for extended periods of time during a global attack, if it can't refuel in mid air? That's one option that sets Air Force one apart from other world leader's planes! Yeah, good luck with that silly reduced option.

[@michaelkeene588]

I thought, Boing sopped building thr 747! are You sure, the new Air Force One is even a 747 at all? I can see a 757, 767 or 777 as Air Force One maybe, but, not a 747 after they just quit building the 747! It's just not logical!

[@eottoe2001]

Oh yeah, supersonic and it will piloted by Bigfoot. Yeah, that's the ticket.