Review of All British Armed Forces Equipment / Quantity of All Equipment

This project exists thanks to donations. Support him!
Patreon: / armyencyclopedia
Donation: www.donationalerts.com/r/army...
NFT: opensea.io/collection/armyenc...
The British Armed Forces, also known as His Majesty's Armed Forces, are the military forces responsible for the defence of the United Kingdom, its Overseas Territories and the Crown Dependencies. They also promote the UK's wider interests, support international peacekeeping efforts and provide humanitarian aid.
Since the formation of the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707 (later succeeded by the United Kingdom), the British Armed Forces have seen action in a number of major wars involving the world's great powers, including the Seven Years' War, the American Revolutionary War, the Napoleonic Wars, the Crimean War, the First World War and the Second World War. Britain's victories in most of these wars allowed it to influence world events and establish itself as one of the world's leading military and economic powers. The British Armed Forces consist of: the Royal Navy, a blue-water navy with a fleet of 70 commissioned ships, together with the Royal Marines, a highly specialised amphibious light infantry force; the British Army, the UK's principal land warfare branch; and the Royal Air Force, a technologically sophisticated air force with a diverse operational fleet consisting of both fixed-wing and rotary aircraft. The British Armed Forces include standing forces, Regular Reserve, Volunteer Reserves and Sponsored Reserves.
The Head of the Armed Forces is the British monarch, currently Charles III, to whom members of the forces swear allegiance.[citation needed] Long-standing constitutional convention, however, has vested de facto executive authority, by the exercise of royal prerogative, in the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Defence. The Prime Minister (acting with the Cabinet) makes the key decisions on the use of the armed forces. The UK Parliament approves the continued existence of the British Army by passing an Armed Forces Act at least once every five years, as required by the Bill of Rights 1689. The Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Marines among with all other forces do not require this act. The armed forces are managed by the Defence Council.
The United Kingdom is one of five recognised nuclear powers, a permanent member on the United Nations Security Council, a founding and leading member of NATO and party to the AUKUS security pact and the Five Power Defence Arrangements. Overseas garrisons and training facilities are maintained at Ascension Island, Bahrain, Belize, Bermuda, British Indian Ocean Territory, Brunei, Canada, Cyprus, the Falkland Islands, Germany, Gibraltar, Kenya, Montserrat, Nepal, Qatar, Singapore and the United States.
_______________________________
► More Military videos on: / quasarentertainment
TWITEER: / quasarenter
_______________________________
#britisharmy #britishnavy #britishairforce #full #review #equipment #uk #british #army #forces

[@ArmyEncyclopedia]

► More Military videos on: kzbin.infovideos

[@maicksalas680]

please argentina

[@markwilliams5240]

The British Government has managed to do what Hitler, The Kaiser and Napoleon could not, destroy the British armed forces.

[@omariya7]

Isn't the uk still a military super power?

[@halihalo4024]

@@omariya7 Not at all. Combat capabilities are very limited especially for Land Forces. The Royal Army has never been so weak. It is severely underfunded and the ammunition stocks aren’t sufficient for a full fledged war that lasts longer than a month. But because of the much poorer state of the other European armed forces it still relatively decent for NATO.

[@jackduddle9449]

Its severely underpowered by british standards but is the most powerful nato country in europe but all european nato countries are also not well funded​@@omariya7

[@rorysegal4562]

@@halihalo4024It’s different to say that as of now our ammunition’s couldn’t last a month because during war times the government would obviously convert factories into Ammunition factories to meet the demands so we could last longer than one month. But the Uk army still is underfunded and relatively weak. Also before the Russian war Ukraine had similar numbers of active personnel to the uk currently (arguably of lower quality of equipment and training)and they are still fighting so what is to say the UK couldn’t do the same thing.

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

More of everything is needed, especially the Royal Navy!!

[@capmultser]

Makes one wonder what the hell they spend all our tax money on. It certainly isn't equipment.

[@tent7014]

Wages ?

[@edik1kaz]

​@@tent7014😂😂😂 very funy , as low as ever

[@lamamawa7541]

I needed this Thanks! Do the next Video can be about Czech Army?

[@paulwestwood4417]

Missed the one V22 used by the SAS.

[@user-bf1ne6iv6o]

Britich army very good.Thanks video.

[@williamdodds1394]

Its a joke .

[@garethraven3933]

Are all these vehicles still in use now, seems like a lot for one army.

[@sparkiegaz3613]

Bet we can’t deploy over 200 challenger tanks…😮

[@adrianflorea3857]

Please do the same with the Romanian army

[@anasqai]

I forgot have new bridge. Wonder what will happen, forest city definitely nice? If under bridge another roadway to country? Floating bridge to allow disallow by timing, use boat instead? About safety anyway this time.

[@anasqai]

Safezone making, cahoot with mafia and private military?

[@bhdr111]

No unmanned ground vehicles or naval equipment?

[@user-yn3ln7cs4c]

NOT sure you have got it correct , I think you should do some research

[@aydankamilova7099]

❤

[@user-lp4tr8wp4z]

Please do the same with the Iraqi army ❤🇮🇶

[@lincolnlg490]

Correct pronunciation (approximate) of Embraer: Embra + air

[@welshdefenceforces]

it’s ai

[@peterjaniceforan3080]

🇬🇧👍

[@karlotto689]

Please do it with the german army

[@ArmyEncyclopedia]

let's do it this week

[@karlotto689]

Thanks bro👍

[@rossnolan2883]

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@user-lb9vj5qq7d]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@petermason5386]

Pitiful in numbers, and equipment, "HMS VICTORY" a living museum for god's sake!

[@mbaknya289]

Inggris dibantu Amerika

[@spartakspartaki6289]

We live on past exploits and rely on the yanks not enough military government always chopping budget did not mention the 1000 handbags

[@noelcahill6707]

Key words here for this review is out of stock

[@noornaharKhatun-hl7bu]

Wb Village 33 you like... kolkata......13/4/2024

[@KingBlueSlimss]

This isn't a review

[@iansmith2997]

It wasn't any better in the 1960s. Using equipment from ww2.

[@christophermcguire27]

It's craap

[@spartakspartaki6289]

We are an absolute joke around the world 🌎 😂

[@VladimirStevanoviclennon33]

153 tanks, and 57.000 soldiers, two nuclear broke submarine on docks....what more? Yeah. emty amunition and balistic sistems due to demilitaryzation of Russia....🤣

[@coops1964]

I’d fear Trident if I were you. Ha Ha.

[@mbaknya289]

Masih ada Amerika Serikat untuk membantu inggris

[@mac2626]

Nonsense.

[@user-dr7rc2ll7o]

Too many models, too little in numbers

[@ericnguyenvan7]

Il faut mettre tout ça a la ferraille un gros tas de fer pour le recyclage.🤣🤣🤣👎

[@Reezour_Waargh]

не густо, но и не пусто) Понятно почему побратимам не помогаете больше - у самих тогда не останется кроме самолётов и кораблей ничего)

[@coops1964]

Enough to beat your ramshackle useless contribution though. It’s quality over quantity that matters. The Russian army recently proves that fact. Have a nice day.

[@user-nh6xv4je3b]

Britain fall😢

[@noornaharKhatun-hl7bu]

Ahamed sir Am Maksud Alam mollick Where are kohy noor

[@asithalk]

Useless weapons..🥴proved in Ukraine.😆😆

[@loyalist5736]

Yeah go on tell us ?

[@Scaleyback317]

Like NLAW, Starstreak, AS90, Light gun, Storm Shadow, Challenger, Mastiff, FH70 for example? Stupid troll!

[@septiccalling8341]

What are, pilgrim?

[@andrewaustin6369]

Only star streak is a current version the UK use's the Chally 2's are stripped out old versions and even without it's current armour setup Russia has taken out 1confirmed a second reported but not verified doesn't sound that useless.

[@Scaleyback317]

@@andrewaustin6369 What is the point you are trying to make? The Chally 2 is more than a match for the T72 no matter how stripped out it is. As for the remainder of the equipment most of it is still in service with a NATO members. Of course the Challenger 2 or any other tank can and will be damaged/destroyed by a variety of enemy weaponry if it goes into battle. I believe the Challenger damaged by the Russians threw a track and was then damaged by direct fire but was recovered by Ukraine and either repaired or used as spares - would not swear to that though. The Challenger 2 will open up even the latest T90's like a can of sardines if it hits one though.

[@user-hd4iz6lj9o]

I'd give it a few years and there will be a new regiment called the gay and lesbians and transgender armored brigade You heard it here first !!!