Bullets are still cheaper than missiles so the best counter for drones and other short range air targets. Better to save those missiles for other targets
@gustavmeyrink_2.0Ай бұрын
To be fair one of the main features of Skyranger 30 & 35 is that they can be mounted on practically anything with sufficienf load capacity.
@malcolmjcullenАй бұрын
A Hilux?
@guidoaselmann-brinkmann403428 күн бұрын
@@malcolmjcullenon steroids 😂 Better use a truck
@samuelwiedaskamel17 күн бұрын
@@malcolmjcullen A Hilux can do anything 💪
@webcrawler9782Ай бұрын
best counter drone system on the market right now
@politenessman3901Ай бұрын
Hard to say, but I'd suggest the EOS Slinger is the best right now.
@chrismitchell4622Ай бұрын
Australia has a cheaper more effective system being sent to Ukraine!
@seanparvis8568Ай бұрын
um....billions spent on design, production, sustaining....all to beat old soviet motors and FPV drones costing $100 ?
@davidvillamarin-lj2pfАй бұрын
No, those are Ukrainians drones. Russian uses Iran drones....
@politenessman3901Ай бұрын
@@seanparvis8568 So Sean, do you have a better and cheaper way to defeat drones? I'm surprised you haven't pitched it and become a billionaire. It's hardly the first time in history that a cheap weapon has come along and needed an expensive countermeasure - depth charges and the type XXI u-boat come to mind.
@johanneswunsche5762Ай бұрын
This sounds good because it is basiclly a Gepard 2.0 because the Gepard is a Anti Aircraft Tank out of Leopard 1.... now with the Cockerrill 3030 and these Skyranger 35... it is Basiclly a better newer Gepard with better Bullets and Computer and also wanna point out these Massive Spare parts around the world. The funny thing is how old Leopard one and Gepard are and still good for Defence
@michaelcordtz1402Ай бұрын
At 3:49, that is a Danish Leopard 2A7, you can tell by the 5 digit identification number, and if you look closely you can see a small danish flag at the rear of the tank
@EupolemosАй бұрын
DANMAG!!
@ephoratagora417916 күн бұрын
A fine piece......
@donaldmatthews7226Ай бұрын
Nice, I hope Australia has kept their Leopard 1s, good use for them.
@kenfowler198027 күн бұрын
Um no we didn’t - they are either monuments in parks the rest are “gone”
@derkernspalterАй бұрын
That would be a true successor to the Gepard wich was also based on the Leopard 1 chassis.
@wirksam675416 күн бұрын
Congratulations 🎉
@Piergeiron14 күн бұрын
It's not "rain-metal". It's "rhine-metal".
@timmurphy5541Ай бұрын
Odd conclusion .... drones are making artillery much harder to protect. You have to get the drones down.
@TB-zf7weАй бұрын
Rheinmetall has claimed that the single barrel Skyranger (30 or 35mm) is more accurate, thus using fewer rounds per target, then the dual 35mm Gepard.
@michaelneuwirth341420 күн бұрын
German, 60. A twin cannon does not double the hit rate, but reduces the hit probability because the recoil of one cannon distorts the hit pattern of the other cannon. The target image of a single cannon is therefore always more accurate, which is why a single cannon consumes less ammunition.
@TB-zf7we20 күн бұрын
@@michaelneuwirth3414 I agree as seems obvious when one sees action pics of russian BMPT-Terminator with dual 30mm that seems to vibrate very badly during firing, can it hit the side of barn??? 🤔
@ycplum7062Ай бұрын
If you can get a sensitive enough proximity fuse that can pick up the small FOV drones, you won't need high rates of fire. It would be a good idea to pair this with an EW system on another vehicle. Redundacy is good.
@research903Ай бұрын
Why are almost ALL content creators using f'ing AI/Robo voices for their videos?!?! Ashamed of your own voice? Afraid you'll be tracked by the boogey-man and doxed? Have some weird phobia? The robo voices constantly mispronounce words and names. Often they pronounce the same word/name differently each time it's encountered in the narrative script! Enough! Just STOP IT!!!
@wcresponderАй бұрын
To lazy.
@TempestparagonАй бұрын
To mad
@vonklinkerhoffen4343Ай бұрын
Certainly can’t pronounce Rheinmetall or Oerlikon properly 😂
@darrenjones368119 күн бұрын
Perhaps they can’t speak English or at least confidently enough, mind you the Ai voices grammar is often laughable
@ditzydoo437815 күн бұрын
It's a Single-Barreled Gepard. using old Leopard-1 chassis. It's a smart move.
@zauselcat10 күн бұрын
The Gepard chassis is diffrent. It's a little bit longer, the batterys are at the back of the chassis. And in the left side on the front is a second engine as a power supply. Instead an ammunitionbunker like in the LEO 1.
@THESocialJusticeWarriorАй бұрын
millimeters.
@serial2663Ай бұрын
seems like most AI text-to-voice algos suffer from this problem same thing with pronouncing the 'met-all' part of Rheinmetall, often times saying 'metal' instead
@gregs756216 күн бұрын
Some of these on C2 chassis they're not upgrading to C3 please.
@tomthetom_on_tour24 күн бұрын
What is the reason for this small amount of rounds?
@chrisb294216 күн бұрын
You only need 2-3 rounds for a target.
@bertnl5304 күн бұрын
It is not that small. On the old Bofors 40L70 you had less, although these were 40 mm rounds, however without advanced technology. Constantly men had to top up the amount of grenades to feed the gun.
@akauppi25 күн бұрын
Quite nice.. but could I wish for the name Rheinmetall to be pronounced "right" the next time? It's like.. minor, but not hard to fix. It's RhAInmetall.
@sergevandyck27 күн бұрын
Depuis des années , je penses que les systèmes d'artillerie, 155 ou LRM devrait être systématiquement accompagné de système anti aérienne de proximité en protection.
@billwhite1603Ай бұрын
Is this AI? I cannot imagine a "defense" channel that doesn't know how to pronounce one of the largest and oldest military equipment manufacturers name correctly. So either this garbage channel just copies ides and reads on the internet, being totally unfamiliar with the products and companies involved, or trash guy pronounced it wrong to cheat comments. Either way, most of you know more than they do. KZbin, do not suggest channel, will be my very, next, click.
@tony18662Ай бұрын
News of skyranger 35 a quick search found articles older than one year old looks imprssive but the turret only holds 252 rounds for a less than a 20 second burst whitout a reload nearby ?
@cathulhu-q7yАй бұрын
@@tony18662 dude, get some education. we are no longer in the 40´s where air defense saturated the sky. the skyranger, just like mantis gives a short 3-10 round burst per target and thats sufficient to destroy the target. the magic of modern ammunition and targeting ;)
@tony18662Ай бұрын
@@cathulhu-q7y and it does that in the video ? the reload time of the system needs work if you ask me that is seldom shown in companies sell pitch.
@heinzkabofke6791Ай бұрын
@@tony18662 BW adopts the 30mm version, so do several other European countries, Ukraine inclusive. Because of the ammunition issue, the better mobility of the Boxer Chassis and they are fitting some Multi Purpose MELLS missiles on top.
@cathulhu-q7yАй бұрын
@@tony18662 bro get some fucking education about what you are talking, before you start talking.
@kenfowler198027 күн бұрын
So it fits on a boxer chassis - handy
@heinzkabofke679126 күн бұрын
the 35mm variant does not. Our 30mm variant does.
@warlordwossman572216 күн бұрын
@@heinzkabofke6791 the 35mm does fit onto a boxer as well, check the prototypes - I think they decided against it to carry more ammo instead.
@TaskSwitcherifyАй бұрын
It's so secure, it won't let mechanics near itself 🔫😮🔐
@amuktadir1991Ай бұрын
YEARLY BASIC.
@samaipata475613 күн бұрын
Dream on‼️🤣🇷🇺✌️🇷🇺✌️🇷🇺✌️
@PhilippBrandAkatosh21 күн бұрын
Gepard 2 ?
@amuktadir1991Ай бұрын
FOR 1ST 5 YEARS.
@sebastianmuller121028 күн бұрын
If it is made in switzerland, they can not use the weapons in war. Such a nice system, but very useless without the ammunition. Is it realy neutral, if you do not give the victim a chance to fight back? Or are you picking a side by enabling the aggressor through your inaction.
@goldfinger20922 күн бұрын
Oerlikon has been bought by Rheinmetall in 1999. They have sites in Switzerland, Germany, Italy, and Canada so Swiss weapon export restrictions are definitely not an issue for new systems.
@pendragooon9 күн бұрын
@@goldfinger209 Correct
@danielburgess778518 күн бұрын
Your robot's inability to properly pronounce German words is disturbing.
@amuktadir1991Ай бұрын
AND EQUALS.
@tony18662Ай бұрын
Why purchase this when you can purchase cv 90 system that has same capability's and is more versatile and cheaper ?
@hirpus66Ай бұрын
Because it's much better
@Alex-gu2ypАй бұрын
Cv 90 has not the same capability have you seen the video? Or since when is the cv 90 a dedicated spaa
@Kurikost_Ай бұрын
cv90 can destroy drones,planes, and shells? Next time..first watch the video then post.
@tony18662Ай бұрын
@@Kurikost_ can be ordered with exact same Israel system Finland company Patria and Hägglunds have already tried it out in tests . But most nations dont purchase Israel equipment due to its outside NATO and its not inside NATO development and upgrade sphere. Sweden and Finland was Neutral and have purchased Israel systems Long before Germany warmed up to the idea its a simple copy on a different chassis.
@bertnl530Ай бұрын
The CV90 ain't always cheaper. If a country has older Leo 2's it may be attractive to convert them in a SHORAD system, for example during a Midlife Update. The car may still be OK, but the turret and gun may be outdated.
@shunichikinoe5081Ай бұрын
unfortunately Germany need Israel's approval before they sell anything to other countries