Another propaganda video from the failed superpower, America! That can't build hypersonics, and instead has to lie! Dark Eagle is not Mach 17! Only its booster rocket is Mach 17 in the upper atmosphere, where missiles have been going above Mach 20 for decades, so Mach 17 is worthless there. Oreshnik is 25 Mach there. Dark Eagle glider is only Mach 5 in the atmosphere. But Orshnik is Mach 12 in the atmosphere. Dark Eagle is 2700 km, Oreshnik is 5500 km. Dark Eagle does not have a nuclear warhead, but Orshnik does. Dark Eagle has no combat operations, but Orshnik does. Dark Eagle is a fake Mach 5 hypersonic with no track record! But Orshnik is a real Mach 12 hypersonic that has defeated Western defenses.

Y is this even a question ..the USA is hurt or sum..or maybe you in the USA who love war must ditch yr media...cuz it lies to gain support from you Americans.. . SMH

"The Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor cost around $138 million per jet in 2009, which is about $191 million in 2023." Not $2.7B per jet, as the narration says. Lmao.

lol this video is pure cope since when is mach 17 faster than mach 24, lol keep trying.

Dark eagle is so dark....nobody so him😂

The narrator does not mention why the steel cannot be used for normal scrap. It isn't radio active.

where inis the evidence of dark eagle 😂😂😂😂 dark eagle the speed are mac 1😂😂😂😂😂😂 acceot US until niw no hypersinic admit😂😂😂😂 dark eagle are no capability 😂😂😂😂😂mac 1 soeed only no match😂😂😂😂😂Lolllll

Wow only 8 have been produced in 2024-2025. And Oregon only gets two F-15EX’s? That’s the Pacific, Oregon’s Air National Guard surely needs a few more.

A channel that should have millions of subscribers. The fact that channels that contain monkeys rather than information are watched a lot is a summary of the world's general culture.

In propaganda US technology always win but in actual its garbage. Its already proven in Ukraine war which they found difficulty in countering russia and in russian side its easy for them to counter US weponry.

Its aforegone conclusion for analysts.even russian nukes are inferior to US nukes.everything in US is superior including toilets ad how to toilet .culture dollar .death.fantastic!!

It all depends on stratagic plan to hit you

Oreshnik missile system ha been tested and proven, but the dark*** has not been seen anywhere, it's a myth

This shows that america is weak and afraid of Russia with pride Oreshnik is far superior to anything anerica is claiming to have

ahhhhhh hypersonic or not , it is more important to have nuclear weapon ...

Usa = 1/2 the effectivness at 20x the cost

The Russian missile has been tested in war and works just fine. The Americans haven’t tested their system in that kind of theater so I would have to say the Russian missile at this time is better. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Pleso, not Pliso. Echo, not England.

Oreshnik just another hype russian junk hypersonic missile

Russian have many Hypersonic missile DEPLOYED besides Oreshink. While US have SUPOSEDLY Dark Eagle? Moreover, maybe it will be deployed next year! If testing is successful?????

dark ...whatever goes 5 mach, Oreshnik a lot more.

America will lose it's next war it has too many females in it's military and in leadership positions

Basically Russia has the best missiles and battle tested while USA has missiles on paper and PP on media🤣

Orechnik is the best.

S-500 est là contre les missiles hypersoniques. Les atlantistes ont quoi contre les missiles hypersoniques ??

Orechnik is the best !

🇪🇸👍🙂 🇫🇷🤝 🇺🇦 💪🔥 ✌️🎗️

No lucky for gi-men who enjoy shirtless sunbath on the tank 100 km away from the enemy line.

Dark Eagle is more superior.

It doesn't make sense why would America try so hard to compete with Russian missile. That so-called dark eagle that America made is just a normal hypersonic missile nothing different just have a nuclear warhead that is all. It's nothing compared to a Russia Oreshnik super hypersonic missile. 🤔

I’m really not sure what the point of even comparing these two systems even is. They are both being made for two completely different doctrinal purposes. LRHW is being built as part of the “global prompt strike” plan. A long range missile which serves as a reliable but very expensive way to help ensure you can service a point target that you really need dealt with quickly. It isn’t going to be available in any sort of number that will have any sort of major strategic impact, it’s part of a wider strategy and is being built to facilitate various strategies or problematise opposing operations. Oresnik on the other hand is a relatively simple concept of throwing a bunch of metal objects (I’d imagine later actually some sort of miniaturised warheads too, else it would be an odd way to throw metal sticks around) from one point to another at a decent range for striking some sort of strategic target like a large factory, power infrastructure or a city. Its main challenge is the fact that it introduces nuclear ambiguity in their launches and the opposing force now has to work out whether the launch of them is a nuclear attack or a conventional one and decide how to respond. Two completely different weapons for two completely different purposes. Comparing them is a strange exercise to say the least. (Edit: correction, DE isn’t a cruise missile but instead a hypersonic boost glide weapon, roughly analogue to chinas DF-ZF)

You need to hear story about Croatias first MiG-21.

US ppt missiles vs Russia battle proven with video.

Nice😮😮😮🎉🎉.

Finaly!!!

Russia's missile is not a hypersonic weapon, by definition. The "O" missile is a ballistic missile. It's no different than the Iskander. One is medium range and the latter is short range. By definition, in order to be dubbed a hypersonic missile, in terms of the increased difficulty to shoot down. If we go by Russia's definition, then the German V2 was a hypersonic missile. It launches quasi-ballistic trajectory. We've been shooting down intermediate/short range ballistic missiles with the ORIGINAL Patiot PAC-1 in the middle east since the '90's. Anyone remember what a SCUD is? Here is the definition of a modern day hypersonic missile. It must reach Mach 5 or higher and maintain atleast Mach 5 throughout the entire trajectory, including the terminal phase. The "Oreshnik" MIRV's were not traveling at hypersonic speeds in the video showing the impacts. Yes, they were hauling @ss, but nowhere near hypersonic. A few of the missiles, Iran shot off at Israel in 2024, were close to Mach 5 at terminal stage. Lastly, again, in terms of modern day definition of hypersonics, it's either going to be a cruise missile or a HGV. MIRV's and HGV's are not the same thing. MIRV's enter the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds, but slow down tremendously in atmosphere. Closer to target, the more dense the air is. The Oreshnik is a ballistic missile with MIRV's. That's it. Nothing new. And those MIRV's are so small, they don't have room for explosives. Just impact damage. It would be something if it hit the target at Mach 5+ speeds. That's what the Dark Eagle does. Oh and I almost forgot. We can shoot down the Oreshnik. We have multiple ways to shoot it down. THAAD was built for that. AEGIS is literally unstoppable with the super duper missile; SM-3. And I bet if you gave the Patriot PAC-3 could probably knock down a couple MIRV's. That's the only way to defeat a missile like this. You have to destroy it out of the earth's atmosphere, typically just after 1st stage separation or 2nd stage. If it has a 3rd stage, then it's an intercontinental or it's just a delivery bus. Once the MIRV's separate from the bus, with or without decoys, then I'd change into my brown pants.

😂Dark eagle is just a joke

Dark eagle is in Hollywood only oreshnik has proven in Ukraine .. western exaggerated and overated only by talk in Hollywood movie.

Of the two WW II Japanese aircrafts mentioned, only the Akagi had its island on the port (left) side of the deck...

There is no jet on earth that beats a f22 raptor. Not this pos or any other jet made.

pronounciation tho... OMG 😵‍💫

US bull shit. 👎👎👎

CROATIA WILL NEVER ALOW 90s serbian attack

You basically need crazy laser stuff to stop thrse things

Basically MARV vs MIRVs. Going at Mach 17, LRHW/Dark Eagle's MARV will have 3 times the KE of a single Oreshnik MIRV going at Mach 10. And is maneuverable too. However Oreshnik has 6 MIRVs each containing sub munitions. Which one will be more powerful may ultimately depend on their intended usage. For sinking Type 003 for example within PLAN CSG, LRHW/Dark Eagle may seem more useful as it can evade enemy defenses. But when flattening an entire airfield, Oreshnik may seem more optimal. I wonder if they can make MARVs small enough so that Minuteman III or upcoming Sentinel can carry 3 x MARVs. While Trident II will carry the most MIRVs.

The pointy one is stronger and scary for those who know

Not a game changer

South Korea's military might deals with North Korea outwardly but is geared towards China internally. For South Korea, North Korea's nuclear program serves as a good excuse for its military buildup. Two Koreans, South Korea and North Korea, have a lot in common. They are basically the same people, with only different systems. Some South Koreans support North Korea's nuclear development because it gives a unified Korea the right to possess nuclear weapons. Though they are a small number, they are now the leading force of the large opposition party, which has a very high possibility of taking power. The ballistic missile of King Jeongjo's ship is a bunker buster now, but when Korea is unified, only warheads need to be changed to nuclear weapons.. So, the South Korean government is not very active in the North Korean nuclear issue. The regime in North Korea can change at any time. That may be tomorrow. And the two Koreas could be unified at any time. A leader could die at any time, and a regime could change at any time. Looking at South Korea now, you can understand why South Koreans think so. Everything changes in North Korea as long as Kim Jong-un disappears, and everything changes in South Korea as long as the president changes. So, there is no need for the people to come forward and go to war at all. However, the possibility of war on the Korean Peninsula is very high. If the pro-Beijing regime collapses in North Korea, Chinese troops are expected to invade North Korea. For South Korea, it is considered a territorial invasion by China. So, there is no choice but to go to war with China. Polls show that South Koreans do not want to be unified. This is not only because of economic damage for the rich South Koreans, but also because of the fear of the price that they have to pay for Chinese interference. However, few South Koreans accept North Korea becoming a Chinese territory. Even if it is going to be an all-out war with China, it probably is. The emergence of a democratic and unified state on the Korean Peninsula, close to the capital Beijing, would be a great fear for China. Chinese interference is inevitable, and Koreans will not be able to tolerate it either. Koreans are the closest country to China in the world, but also Koreans are the ones who hate China the most in the world. The people closest to Japan in the world are Koreans, but also, those who hate Japan the most are Koreans. That is what happens when countries fight against each other without complete victory or complete defeat for 2,000 years.. There are two systems on the Korean Peninsula, but Koreans living in completely different systems have many similar ideas... One can understand why North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, who is absolutely dependent on China, sent troops to Russia despite China's fierce opposition. Just as South Korea rejects Japan whenever it has a chance, North Korea abandons China when it has a chance. Perhaps many people were surprised to see South Korea's Yoon Suk Yeol on the emergency martial arts show. They have different systems and tremendous economic levels, but they are the same Koreans with similar ideas.. 50 years ago, South Korea developed nuclear weapons and missiles in opposition to the withdrawal of U.S. forces during military dictatorship. It ended when the South Korean president, who was pushing for it, was assassinated. What the North Korean regime is doing was the same thing the South Korean regime did against the U.S. 50 years ago..

European mindset father of everything father of bomb 😅 even the blackpowder bombs pre dates european fireworks they still love to grab fathering anything 😅

@FP_Defense_News I am following a research trail from an AP article from July of 2003, describing the DOD's desire to develop a mach 5 reusable by 2010 called the FALCON system. This is the closest I have come to a system that clears that bench. Can you point me to any useful information about the evolution of this project?