Great stuff Kyle. I'd certainly agree that having simpler starting surfaces would make Shell work much better - but sometimes you just have to work with what you've got. When Shell fails a result is generally achievable with a little bit of work.
@Rhinoceros3d4 ай бұрын
yep, something to start with is way better than "just won't do it" which is how a parasolid kernel modeler fails. Shell gets a lot of hate, some of it deserved, but IMO it's good parts are often overlooked.
@krzysztofmathews7383 ай бұрын
This is extremely helpful. Thank you.
@cadcaetutorial20393 ай бұрын
Very amazing sir
@Rhinoceros3d3 ай бұрын
thanks for watching!
@RussellMims-e4h3 ай бұрын
It seems like it's .better to shell outward. May require more pre-computation.True?
@Rhinoceros3d3 ай бұрын
not necessarily, you still have to offset, trim and rejoin each surface in the model.
@EngineerAAJ4 ай бұрын
After I learned what single span was, my surfacing life got 1000x better.
@Rhinoceros3d4 ай бұрын
right?!? want to learn more? watch this series...it's amazing. kzbin.info/aero/PLABJCJR46itOX8XT3bd2dh590McA94W7k
@arkapadma4 ай бұрын
Do Rhino have asset library like sketchup warehouse where people share their model?
@Rhinoceros3d4 ай бұрын
no, but we can import just about anything from any 3d model site like turbosquid, sketchup warehouse etc..
@RussellMims-e4h3 ай бұрын
Better to shell outward. Less failure. Correct?
@Rhinoceros3d3 ай бұрын
you'd have to plan for that from the beginning. Most folks built the exterior and shell inward. Doing what you are suggesting would change the shape and dimensions of the part. plus you face the same issue with self intersections, just generally in fewer places.