Richard Mille RM005 | Complete Overhaul

[@luxudo]

People who bought this watch dont care about history, craftmanship. They only care about showing off. They pay 90% of the price for the Brand, not for the watch

[@SharedAccount-yz9zb]

Well isn't that about personality of person itself, not just capable buyers but 99.9% population wouldn't care about craftsmanship. People like u and me are very few who would cheer, gets curious, gets impressed about the mechanism behind craftsmanship.

[@joanlopez6314]

fantastic video. Thanks for posting!

[@ChronoSky]

Our pleasure!

[@richardsuarez3668]

Chrono Sky #1

[@carlossuarez5331]

I have four of these watches lying around somewhere… excellent video! Keep up the great work!

[@ChronoSky]

Thanks, will do!

[@judyavila3265]

Thank you Carlos

[@J27-r6t]

I’m sure you have four of these $100k+ watches “lying around somewhere” stop lyin

[@Luke-pb4pc]

Post your watch collection if you have a dope collection woukd be interrst3d to see it

[@noob9103]

lose horrible bgm, use actual sound

[@hatemabughabin3683]

What a cheap Looking watch 😮

[@noob9103]

just shows how horrible the watch is

[@humbertonoysuarez8038]

Exitos amigo, felicidades, Humberto

[@judyavila3265]

Gracias Humbertico, saludos a todos

[@miguelpontes8985]

💯

[@davidcris4318]

😱😱😱🔥🔥

[@carmenzayasbazan8848]

Beautiful 🤩

[@judyavila3265]

Thank you

[@darksideka]

No craftsmanship whatsoever in that overpriced casio like movement no perlage, no anglage Nothing!!! But stamped and cnc'd cut bits of metal and carbon fibre. Really only worth it's weight in toilet paper

[@DirtFather407]

There actually is anglage and black polished parts, clearly you only know basic stuff. This watch is expensive for other reasons, it’s also very shock resistant which is difficult for a mechanical watch. I agree the price is high but lots of people can easily afford it

[@garyboyle695]

​@@DirtFather407The mark up on Ram's must be astronomical because they sure as hell don't spend a lot manufacturing it.

[@noob9103]

can not agree with you more, its piece of crap.

[@adriannasyraf3534]

5s/day is horrible for an expensive watch

[@danijelparadzik8336]

take your any wrist watch, put it in timegrapher and then turn the position of the watch 180°. you will have a deviation of 5-20 s/d.

[@garyboyle695]

​@@danijelparadzik8336Not true as that should be one of the 5 positions adjusted to in a chronometer grade movement.

[@mercuriall2810]

@@garyboyle695They’re not far wrong, at all. People often don’t realise how much positional rate variation can exist in a COSC certified chronometer movement, adjusted to 5 positions. A COSC rated chronometer must have an average daily rate across all positions of -6s to +4s per day. There can be a -8 to +6 s/day variation between dial up and dial down. The maximum difference between any of the 5 test positions must be no greater than 10s/day. Then we must remember that COSC tests across 5 positions. All of the remaining error is hidden in the 6th position, which may exceed the 10s/day delta that is permitted between the 5 test positions.

[@_PhinneyWood_]

Vaucher movement. Easy to service. Good stuff. Love that RM’s basic stuff is Vaucher haha

[@williammedina6367]

Maestro

[@baldweg7097]

Präzision und Genialität, 🤗🤗🌺

[@judyavila3265]

Thank you

[@jorfedgonbol]

A better and magnified close-up is recommended

[@dang6234]

I just don't get the allure of these. So ugly and plastic looking when compared to almost all other high end brands.

[@DirtFather407]

Because it looks cool and unique. Not everyone wants to wear their grandfathers watch or get something mainstream and look like everyone else

[@garyboyle695]

​@@DirtFather407They look like crap, there's no artistry in RM watches. Overpriced Casio's.