The 757 sounds rowdy - but the A350 sounds great in its own right
@volantee2 жыл бұрын
You can *feel* the power of the Trents.
@twincitiesaviator2 жыл бұрын
Those Trents were fantastic! Subbed ✅
@Pkmn_mlp_sonic_fnaf_fan Жыл бұрын
The flaps and slats are so loud that it can be heard from the front but the slats is the loudest than the flaps at the back
@SpottingWithEthan2 жыл бұрын
Nice takeoff, love the views
@RuiPlaneSpotter2 жыл бұрын
Nice video my friend!
@supertrooper732 жыл бұрын
Sounds like my Maytag on spin cycle
@diego90XD2 жыл бұрын
the best engine sound😎
@tomtalker20005 ай бұрын
Yeah right up there with the 777. The A330 with Trents isn't bad either.
@Zenoman12342 жыл бұрын
Beautiful!!
@Wildlifesupernannyfan Жыл бұрын
Is that economy class as I love a good engine view?
@NDSAviation1 Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately this was up in first
@ronduncan952710 ай бұрын
Beast!
@ClearSkyProductions7772 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@willamisbezerra69702 жыл бұрын
Que Subida Turbulenta eh kkkkk Passando Pelas Nuvens Bem Turbulenta 😂😂
@naturallyherb2 жыл бұрын
Love this!
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Hope you stop by for more of my videos!
@n310ea2 жыл бұрын
It seems that Delta is the only U.S. carrier that has A350's.
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is correct
@Odontomango9 ай бұрын
Yeah, they love their Airbuses. A350s, A330neo, A321neo and now they even ordered even more A350-1000. While they retired all their B777 back then.
@n310ea9 ай бұрын
In the 1980's, when my Dad worked for Delta, Delta said they would never fly Airbuses and bragging about how good L-1011's were.
@Christin55542 жыл бұрын
when is Delta flying again from DUS Germany to the US?
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
I am the wrong person to ask about that. Sorry about that. Thanks for stopping by!
@samypons3185 Жыл бұрын
niceee
@NDSAviation1 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@JTRAIN2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like an a380
@gastonvidal86242 жыл бұрын
GE o Trent?
@aleksanderszymanowski66312 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure It’s RR Trent, GE sound more roaring/fanlike and a bit quieter.
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
It's a Trent XWB! All A350s are powered by Trent XWBs.
@hussienalsafi11492 жыл бұрын
😘😘😘😘😘😘🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@distreleclavezzari19682 жыл бұрын
I PREFER 747
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
If I can get back on a 747 I’d be thrilled. But the opportunity to do so in a way that makes sense for me hasn’t come up in the foreseeable future unfortunately. Hopefully some day though!
@ChrisZoomER2 жыл бұрын
Once again, another video that refers to buzzsaw noise as a "roar." I honestly don't know why...
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that you’re here, but why the negativity? For me and many others, we feel like a buzzsaw is a higher pitched sound. Even so, for larger, more powerful engines on bigger planes, I think people say “Roar” instead of “buzzsaw” because it’s more fitting - roar sounds larger and more powerful than buzzsaw. To aviation enthusiasts, buzzsaw implies more of a smaller engine like the V2500 or the CFM56. That kind of nitpicking is unnecessary here.
@ChrisZoomER2 жыл бұрын
@@NDSAviation1 When I say roar, I mean jet exhaust noise. I'm sorry if I hurt you're feelings but different aviation enthusiasts take terms differently. I don't know any who think that buzzsaw implies a smaller, higher pitched engine.
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisZoomER With all due respect, but if you go to youtube and type in "buzzsaw takeoff," almost all videos will exclusively feature 737s and a320s. If you youtube "engine roar takeoff," almost all videos will feature a330s, a350s, 747s, 767s, and 777s. It doesn't take long to see that there's an obvious difference in the featured aircraft when classified by terminology. Besides, "different aviation enthusiasts take terms differently" - that statement itself validates my use of "roar" in the title even if you personally think of it as a buzzsaw. I have seen V2500s described as "roaring" and Trent XWBs described as "buzzsaw" occasionally too, but not as often as the reverse. I've been watching aviation videos for 20 years and have watched tens of thousands of hours of them, so I have an idea of how most aviation enthusiasts think based on how the videos are titled and what the comments say: buzzsaw is usually used in 737 and a320 videos, while roar is used for heavy aircraft.
@ChrisZoomER2 жыл бұрын
@@NDSAviation1 Yeah, I'm a bit of an amateur when it comes to aviation video terms as I've only watched takeoff videos for a few years. I apologize again. I get my terms not from KZbinrs who film flights but aeronautical engineers and aircraft manufacturers who seem to use the terms *very* differently. They never refer to buzzsaw as "roar" because it has a technical meaning (when the fan blades spin at supersonic speeds) of which is undesirable for the engine so they want to reduce fan speed with additional turbine stages and/or gearboxes. They use the term roar to refer to exhaust noise (jet exhaust noise, not fan exhaust nor turbine exhaust). For example: Concorde had a very loud and high-pitched roar due to no bypass and the use of afterburners because they greatly increase exhaust velocity. I truly am sorry, I use it the way the experts do and not how your average person uses it so I'm also sorry for any confusion I caused due to differences in our word choices. I hope this helps.
@NDSAviation12 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisZoomER I figured something of the sort. I had read before that the buzzsaw sound comes from the supersonic speeds that the fan blades spin at, which makes for really exciting sounds for us aviation youtubers but is understandably undesirable from the engineering standpoint. Don't worry about any offense - I was not offended. I was mostly just trying to explain how it was used among aviation youtubers and had a feeling you were coming from a different discipline/perspective, so I really was trying to be sincere in my comments, but that may have been lost in the text. Thanks for coming to my channel though!