Olympus 40-150mm f4-5.6 R Best First Lens for Beginners Part 6 ep.91

[@mvs3553]

Trustful, no-nonsense reviewer.

[@RobTrek]

Thank you.

[@smiff4748]

I bought the 40-150 mm lens because of watching this great video. It has rapidly become my favourite lens. Just wanted to say thank you for the video Rob. Keep them coming please.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. It's a great little lens for the money!

[@Emo_Gamer_Gabe]

@@RobTrek would this lens fit the Lumix GH4 camera?

[@imagenatura]

Fantastic lens advice and buying advice. I really enjoy your common sense approach to buying purchases and advice that doesn't break the bank. I wish I had seen this video about a year ago. Thank you so much for your hard work.

[@RobTrek]

Thank you!

[@bartrehbein5052]

Rob, I am new to serious photography and just bought the Olympus OM D 10 Mii. I love the camera and your videos have been extremely helpful in getting comfortable with this camera quickly. I had a friend comment that he couldn't believe how much I knew about the settings on this camera in such a short time. I told him it was Rob's videos that were the reason I had learned so much quickly. My camera came with the 14-42 kit lens and I had already decided to order the 40-150 you cover in this video when I saw it was only $99 and read the positive reviews. A few hours later I saw this video and I thought, "Great Rob says this is the next lens to buy and its the one I just ordered." Thanks for the great videos Rob. Keep it up.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. You won't regret the purchase. It's a great compact addition.

[@PPISAFETY]

Rob, you are absolutely correct about this lens. I own it and liked it so well that I gave one as a gift to my best friend who is just starting out in serious photography. He moved from shooting photos with his iPhone and thinking they were great to using an original OM-D EM5 that I had as a spare. He also has the pancake kit zoom. He now loves photography and is out all the time taking pictures, especially with the 40-150. It is so small and light that it fits in a fanny pack with the EM5 and the pancake lens and he has everything covered that he really needs. About a year ago, I found a great deal on a used 12-40 f2.8 PRO for $350 and bought it, selling a prime lens to pay for it. I haven't regretted it one bit, and love the build quality, the constant aperture, the weather sealing, and the manual focus clutch. It lives more or less full-time on my EM1. But honestly I struggle to see much difference optically between the PRO and the EZ zoom for most pictures under normal conditions although there is some. As you have noted, those differences can clearly be corrected in post-processing. What makes the PRO lens a piece of professional equipment is its performance under harsh conditions, less than ideal light, and its life expectancy when subjected to lots of handling. Also, a working professional would not have to spend as much time in post processing, and for him or her, time is money. These are simply not concerns for most of us. But, for anyone lusting after the 40-150mm 4-5.6's big brother, the 40-150mm 2.8 PRO, let me just say that I briefly went down that road, ordering one from Amazon for $1,100.00. I loved how it felt in the hands, how it functioned and focused, just about everything about it. If I were making my living with a telephoto lens I'd absolutely own it. But compared to the much smaller and lighter 40-150 kit zoom, I didn't use it that much nor did I love it to the tune of a grand extra over the little one, so I sent it back. But I can certainly see where a pro shooting weddings wouldn't want to show up with a $99 plastic zoom lens hanging off their camera, no matter how good it might be. I have owned a lot of photo gear over the last 50 years, and generally have found that the camera company engineers now have a very good idea of whom they are designing a particular lens for, and are working hard in most cases to provide what that target audience needs. This 40-150 4-5.6 is a great example of designing a product for the customer who will actually use it.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for taking the time to share your story. I couldn't agree more! I use the 12-40pro on my jobs, but rarely take it out for my casual photography - nor my em1.2. The em10.2 with the kit lenses are very close in performance to the top of the line versions and I don't worry about lugging the extra weight and expensive gear on hikes.

[@mistergiovanni7183]

I love that there are guys like you who take the time to demonstrate how with a cheap lens you can get professional results. I take advantage of my bike rides to take photos, I don't have much space nor do I want to carry a lot of weight. With a 12-45 and this 40-150 I cover almost any focal length. I also use full frame and I have compared this light and plastic lens with Nikkor zooms and primes and I always end up thinking how can such a cheap lens work so well, there is not such a big difference in image quality. Perhaps the weakest point is a not so fast focusing but even so, it is still a surprising lens. Thanks Rob!

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Really appreciate Rob answering a question I put, maybe a little poorly worded the first time, but he was able to make out my question the second time. Very grateful that he devotes so much of his time, for free, Patreon a little outside my spending limits at the moment as I am only working 2 days a week and my wife's casual hours have been cut by 80% - courtesy of the virus.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks, Robert. I value your participation as much as I do any monetary donation. Knowing that I helped someone is reward enough.

[@ladylouiseh]

Hi Rob, Thank you from the bottom of my heart for making these video's. I am similar to some other comments, I have been a Canon girl for many years, but became tired of lugging heavy gear around, so I opted for the M10 Mark ii, to see if I could adapt to small mirrorless​ set up, but failed to feel the love for it, other than the weight or lack of! However, I found your videos and I am now starting to enjoy my little travel camera, thanks so much, I was about to sell the lot, now I am so happy and getting much better results! Thank you!

[@RobTrek]

So glad you decided to stick with Olympus. It's a great system. Thanks for the feedback!

[@paulondra19]

Thank you soooo much for the recommendation Rob. I just got my Olympus 40-150mm F/4-5.6 ($78) and a Fotasy Metal 58mm Lens Hood ($6) on Amazon. I CANNOT, repeat CANNOT, believe how light, compact, and sharp this lens is. So worth the money and is a perfect companion to the 14-42 EZ pancake zoom that came with my OM-D EM-10 Mark II. I now have an ideal hiking/travel system.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks, Paul. It's a great and affordable setup.

[@peterosborne9802]

Another great vlog rob and i agree , i got my 40/150 with my olly 10 mk3 along with the 14/42. Kit lenses and as a keen amateur photographer i struggle to see any great advantage to justify the expense of a prime lense like the Olympus 25mm for me , although its a great lense and i dont dout professional photographer's will argue it is an essential part of your kit as a keen amateur im happy with these lenses for now. I even had another photographer comment on one of my photos asking " which prime lense did you use". When i said it was the 14/42 kit lense he got all puffy then saying perhaps it wasnt so good after all.? He was one of those photographers who got everything thats expensive canon this canon that i even think he had a canon hat ! but still can't get a decent shot. I've meet several of them. Lol.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for sharing your storing. Reminds me of the saying "All the gear and no idea."

[@babycow5894]

The 25mm will be useful in lowlights

[@AndrewSowerby]

The lens snobs are almost as bad as the sensor snobs. No matter how many primes you have, good kit standard and tele zooms will always be useful tools. They get the job done!

[@evpeiris5727]

Amazing review and a great comparison. I just got this lens today for 70 AUD (about 45 usd) and it’s soo good for the price. I also got a mega deal for the pany leica 12-60 2.8 - 4. Time to have some fun going outside

[@niccoloverecondi1964]

Thanks Rob, you are the best teacher, even I'm Italian, I can understand very well, you are so clear !!

[@RobTrek]

Thanks!

[@grangermacy]

It really is a great lens. At first I was disappointed in it but finally figured out the importance of a fast enough shutter speed. I was finally convinced when it tested it very favorably against some Nikon primes. Using 1/500 or faster is the key to 'sharpen' the lens. When coupled with auto iso you can get great shots. These Oly MFT lenses do so well wide open that they're a bit faster than the f stop rating would suggest

[@RobTrek]

Shutter speed is the key! Thanks.

[@maciejtaczynski6940]

Rob, thank you for the video and review. I just purchased this lens and can't wait to test it out. I am new to this hobby and I find your tutorials very useful. I feel there is an overload of information but you have a way of explaining things in a very clear way. I shoot with EM 10 Mark II. Thanks again and keep these videos coming.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I try to make it simple. My way of explaining connects better with some than others.

[@finnwang1538]

Amazing little lens, Rob. Love it on my Pen F. Makes me feel like an olden days B/W photographer 🤗📷. I am blown away by the quality of the images. And it makes taking pictures so much enjoyable and fun. I get so many compliments on the looks of the camera. It seems as if people relax because they like the camera so much. It takes the seriousness out of photography or being the “model “ or object. Thanks again for your time in making the videos.

[@RobTrek]

It is really a great lens!

[@paulm8157]

👍Well done, Rob. My takeaway is the subtle push to get folks more into image editing - the value editing can add to a modestly priced, but decent quality, lens. Editing lessons learned that way can entice folks to more editing, in general. That said, hope you are anticipating new Olympus products and will review them in timely vids. Nice macro and dog images, as well.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I might include more editing in future videos because that is equally important in my opinion. I don't really have the budget for new cameras, like the pl9 and em10-iii. If Olympus decides to send me one for review, then I'll certainly post my thoughts on it.

[@gloppenpadleklubb]

Thanks for showing how good low cost lenses are! And the importance of a hood. I’ve been struggling with focus and sharpness with my 70-300, so now I see that I should get that hood. It’s a shame that the Olympus hoods doesn’t come with the lenses, except from the pro lenses.

[@RobTrek]

The hood helps, but don't expect a huge difference. Thanks!

[@alaskalonghunters2990]

Thanks for this Rob. Got one w my m5 from B+H to augment my kit and will take good care of this baby now!

[@RobTrek]

Enjoy!

[@Cabbydave49]

This is a stupendous lens for both value and image quality. The whole reason I switched to m4/3 was I was fed up with lugging my full frame pro Canon kit so why would I even consider buying a pro lens when this 40-150mm f4-5.6 does exactly what I want.

[@RobTrek]

Agreed. Thanks for sharing!

[@mawavoy]

Rob, thanks for this video post. I just purchased the 40 - 150 without seeing your post. I was planning to purchase the 60mm macro. It is sharp and a great little lens. I now think I can wait. I have been shooting the 40- 150 at 60mm to get learn that focal length. I have been amazed at my em5’s dynamic range. It helps with the slower lens. I purchased the em5 and the 12 x 40 pro lens together for $550. That combo is great. Pro is tack sharp. I shot some fireworks tonight (7-4). Thanks again!

[@RobTrek]

You got a great deal!

[@2Old4Toys]

Bravo. The camparrison of 99 bucks vs 700 bucks. You saved me a lot of money and happy to carry way less glass weight in my walkabout camera bag too.

[@RobTrek]

No need for expensive lenses most of the time. Helps somewhat in professional use of course.

[@juanitoperez3754]

Hi Mr Trek. I have a question about the 40-150 you are analysing.Why You mention it as a lens for beginners??? It is for it's poor aperture...??? In my opinion,I think that a lens will do what the photographer obligates it to do....and it is not he necessary would be a beginner.Thanks a lot.My best regards

[@RobTrek]

Most beginners buy the camera with only one lens. I recommend this to be the next lens since it is cheap and very good. However, the lens is good for all levels of photography. The slow aperture is not the reason why I said it's for beginners. Thanks. -Rob

[@northdevonpictures826]

After searching what feels like forever for my next camera and lenses at the best price, well, thanks to you it's settled. Big thumbs up, and subscribed 👍 Thank you very much Rob.

[@RobTrek]

Glad to help!

[@bdssoaz]

Hello Rob, Great video as usual, and some amazing photos proving that it's in fact a gem of a lens. Keep up, great job and thanks for sharing with us. Cheers!

[@RobTrek]

Thanks! Nice to see you again.

[@imagenatura]

Hi Rob, I just got this lens for my birthday. It should add a little more to my photography possibilities. I found it with the hood included.

[@RobTrek]

Wow, must be a new thing. Mine definitely didn't come with it. Happy Birthday!

[@imagenatura]

@@RobTrek In fact, it's used, like new. I still haven't received yet, but I'll report back when I do.

[@michaelhawkins1173]

Cheers Rob your videos are all you need to take create images with confidence. Just great.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Glad to help.

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Was toying with buying a mint second hand 12-100 Pro. However, purchased one of these at a good price. Still think a 17 1.8 would be a good investment for portrait type shots. Must day, even the top priced Olympus lens are unbeatable value. Also, very sensible, non glass snob review.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks, Rob! If you can get the 17mm at $250 USD or less, get it. I made a vlog after I bought the 17mm here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXenYZqBac1jisk

[@kjl6138]

This 40-150 is absolutely one of the best Olympus lenses! Very sharp for the price! Excellent and superb lens! But, something definitely has me keeping the “mighty 75” 🙂

[@RobTrek]

I need to take the 75mm out. It's just collecting dust.

[@Woodenarrows]

Second visit,. Came to look at your Amazon Basics Large Camera video and fell into this one after. Again, these Olympus 'kit' lenses can be very rewarding.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Hard to beat that bag or lenses for the money! Now if we can get a bag full of money.

[@DaChamorro]

Awesome video! Thank you for stepping through this is such great detail!

[@RobTrek]

Glad it was helpful!

[@raygeary1698]

Plus lens hood protect front element !! Good job

[@barbarasantos7523]

I was having second thoughts on whether I should buy that lens and your video just explained it perfectly. Definitely going to purchase it.

[@RobTrek]

You won't regret it!

[@shellzrl4179]

In my country that lens costs as much as the camera itself... 😩 Anyways, I have to say thank you for making these videos and teaching me basically everything I need to know to start taking pictures like I've been doing it for years. Really great tutorials and explanation videos, love you man.

[@johnrayner8126]

Some time ago I had an Oly E620 plus the usual kit lenses, 14-42 and 40-150. Both plastic lens mounts, which with the larger lens, because of the large amount of time I used it, soon wore out. The quick super glue fix didn't really last. I was fortunate to get a metal mount for it. I now have advanced to an EM10 MkII + 14-150 ll. I do not get as clear, sharp pics as I did with the old 4/3 lens. It's a great pity Oly didn't have the M4/3 40-150 with a metal mount - we're talking about a few dollars difference for a more robust lens.

[@RobTrek]

Corporate penny pinchers probably forced the engineers to use a plastic mount. The 14-150 is of course a compromise. I found the 14-42 and 40-150 combo quite good.

[@geofff6671]

This confirms what I already knew. I have this lens and it is wonderfully sharp and compares well with my 40-150 f2.8 pro. Unfortunately not all consumer zooms are quite so good. I’ve tried a few comparable ones from Panasonic and the Oly 75-300 f4.5-6.3 and while they are ok they are not quite as sharp.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for sharing your experience.

[@DivisionStreetDrums]

just picked this up after using my 40-150 4/3rd adapted lens, quality of lens is the same but so fast to focus. Thanks Rob, love all the videos.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for watching!

[@DivisionStreetDrums]

@@RobTrek as much as I can Rob

[@robertgorden8066]

Thanks for the great review Rob

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for watching. It's a great lens!

[@gargoyle38]

Really a good thorough review showing lots of options, comparisons, techniques and an absolutely mind blowing comparison of a $100 and $700 lens...guess which won....

[@RobTrek]

I rarely use my 12-40mm, but the 40-150 is almost always in my bag when I go out.

[@arthurrmcphee4885]

Great video once again, the beginners advice and the hands on comparisons are sublime. A well constructed and delivered video, thanks for sharing Rob!

[@RobTrek]

Thanks!

[@Cabbydave49]

Thanks for the outstanding videos. Something new every day.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks!

[@nimkal]

12:25 Wow. First of all yes this lens looks amazing and I agree the pictures are so sharp and great. Secondly, I need to learn photoshop as that was quite amazing to see what you did, it basically looks like original bokeh from a lens. Subscribed, thank you. Also those last pictures were all taken with the 40-150mm? They looked nice. Could I take as good a pictures in 16:9 ratio with the E-m5 Mark 2?

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Yes, all taken with 40-150mm.

[@DerVagabundli]

Thank you ever so much for making me feel good about my spontaneous 35€ buy and the tip with the macro tubes. Can´t wait ´till it arrives!

[@RobTrek]

You'll enjoy it a lot!

[@juliehunstad4779]

Another great video! I got the 40-150mm lens as a Christmas gift from my dad so I’m really happy to hear that it’s a fantastic lens! I’m going to order extension tubes & the lens hood per your recommendation. I have a couple of trips coming up this year & I’ve never brought my good camera on vacation so this will be a first! I’m looking forward to it!

[@RobTrek]

I can say without hesitation that the 40-150 is probably the best bang for the buck lens ever made!

[@kidlatazul]

Thank you for this video, not only for the review of the lens but also for the short lesson on editing. Based on your recommendation I bought a used copy of the lens off eBay, $75 plus shipping. If it turns out to work as well as you say it will be the greatest bargain I've ever gotten in photography.

[@RobTrek]

It's an awesome lens. I have yet to hear anyone say otherwise at this price point!

[@pauldpoulpe280]

Great review. I just got this lens at a great price (about $80 equivalent) a few days ago, and am quite impressed with it, especially at this price. I wonder if you have or plan to do a video with macro extension tube on this lens. Thanks

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Yes, I did a macro video with this lens and tubes here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpnblJubYrdkl7s

[@jonbarnard7186]

I agree. The 40-150 f4 is the unsung hero of Olympus lenses. Great travel lens. Weighs almost nothing, unlike the Pro 40-150 which weighs a ton.

[@RobTrek]

I love this lens. Thanks!

[@melvinch]

Olympus should have made this a constant F4 lens.

[@lorenschwiderski]

For $99 ? Good luck on that one!

[@stuartreece8821]

Hi Rob, I only quite recently came across your channel but I have now caught up with all the videos. My main kit is full frame Nikon D750 and pro level lenses and a while ago I tried an Olympus OMD EM5 Mark 1 hoping to change to the micro four thirds system to cut down on size and weight of my kit but I have struggled to get the results I get with the Nikon kit which I am more familiar with. I have found your videos very informative and enjoyable and they have inspired me a bit to keep trying with the Olympus kit. Many thanks for the videos, please keep them coming.

[@RobTrek]

Hi. I have the d750, but it collects dust now. May trade it for the z6 later. When I pair the d750 with my Ziess Distagon 35mm f/2 or my 70-200mm f/4, the images are magic! It's also amazing with my 20mm f/1.8 for astorphotography. So I understand exactly where you are coming from. I recently did a portrait comparison of my buddies d850 w/24-70 f/2.8 and my em1.2 w/12-40 pro and can tell you, aside from the megapixel difference, the images from my Olympus were on par. Depth of field is an uphill battle, but good composition and lighting can makeup for that. For portraits, I typically crush the ambient light with flash 1-2 stops for subject isolation. For landscapes, I take 3 pano shots to makeup for resolution. For action, I pre-focus and/or take more pictures. The m4/3 system will test your skills, but I think it's more rewarding. Check out Joe Edelman's channel if you haven't already. He shoots olympus now, mainly for the size/weight benefit and features. I'm not really a portrait guy like him, but I switched for the same reasons and have no regrets. I miss the easy shallow DOF of full frame, but not the size/weight.

[@stuartreece8821]

I think the problem with the Z series is they will probably do like Sony and Canon and introduce big heavy lenses which I think defeats the objective of the mirrorless design. I have been lucky enough to borrow an Olympus 12-40 pro a few times and would really like one but here in the UK its £700 (about $900) so would be a big investment in a system I am not fully comfortable with yet. Its a long time since I saw Joe Edlemans channel - probably the video when he announced he was moving over to Olympus, but I think I'll start watching them, thanks

[@joanburns7509]

I just received this lens and can’t wait to try it out. Thanks for the great video.

[@RobTrek]

Great! It's much better than it's price would suggest.

[@petergulliver3225]

I'm glad you have done a review on this lens, as I have been thinking about it for some time. The only thing is I did buy the 60mm macro when Olympus had a 50 quid refund on it in the new year. If I get the 40mm-150mm lens I will get the macro rings as well. As I think this this set up will be better for shooting outside in the country when you can't close enough for some reason. Good review Rob.

[@RobTrek]

The 60mm is great. A dedicated macro will always be sharper, brighter, and straighter. I was looking at the 60mm but ended up getting the 75mm since I really only casually do macro stuff.

[@normantremain4059]

Thank you so much fro your videos Rob, I find them easy to understand and very helpful

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Glad to help, Peter.

[@kerry5586]

I actually prefer the background blur on the 40-150 over the 75mm. The 75mm looks too blurred for my liking. P.S. I just ordered the 40-150 and I am like a child waiting for Christmas morning! Thanks for your great reviews.

[@RobTrek]

Great to hear!

[@neilbusbridge8947]

Another great tutorial Rob thank you. What are your thoughts on the Olympus 45mm prime? Regards, Neil.

[@RobTrek]

It's a terrific lens. I have a video for it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/navLnGRjnL9llZY

[@neilbusbridge8947]

@@RobTrek Hi Rob, thank you for taking the time to reply to me, an excellent tutorial it will definitely be my next lens. Regards Neil.

[@bosamuelsson5814]

Well, I have this lens, but I have not sen this potential! Now, my m10, :IV with the kitlens, 14-42 and this 40-150 must be myfaborit for the must photos. My Olympus m1: II with the prolens 12-40 F2,8,; 40-150, F2,8 ; 300,F4 must use for speciellt event! Tank You for your excellent information!

[@RobTrek]

Thank you!

[@hisownfool1]

Exactly what I was thinking. On my wishlist.

[@RobTrek]

You'll love it!

[@kennynvake4hve584]

It might seem like a lot..but I got the e520 with this lens..and the 14-42 lens, charger battery, magnifying view finder eyepiece , and old style(OM) olympus lens to 4/3's mount adapter, three hoods, manuals, box's, for 170$.

[@RobTrek]

That is an awesome deal! I've paid more for filters alone!

[@Davidcallard]

I have the original version of this lens, the Four Thirds f3.5 40 - 150mm. which came with a steel lens mount and nothing will part me from it. I'm still shooting with my various Four Thirds cameras and I have no plans to change any of them so this lens has a lot more work ahead yet.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for sharing your experience!

[@bashwi1]

Hi Rob, just recently getting back into interchangeable lens photography after starting with an old Canon Ftb 35mm film camera way back in the early 70's, and have been using your instruction as my primary guide. I especially enjoyed your hints on converting this lens to a macro with the extension tubes - a great, timely tip as I have been looking at macro lenses (not cheap). I guess this same procedure would work on many other zooms, i.e. the Olympus 14-150mm f4-5.6 II ED MSC? Thanks!

[@RobTrek]

Yes. You just have to zoom out to 40mm or higher to get some working distance. Magnification doesn't change much. I have a new video on macro you can watch. I use reverse rings in that one.

[@stephenmason5682]

Another great video Rob, can I ask, when using a tripod do you switch off the vibration control? From UK.

[@RobTrek]

I leave the ibis on auto 99% of the time, including tripod use. I will turn it off if I have a very steady tripod and doing long exposures - 10 secs or longer.

[@ordinosaurs]

"Best 2nd lens" is perhaps a bit emphatic. It really depends on what you intend to do. For learning the ins and out of photography, I still think a prime normal to semi-wide (25 to 17 in MFT) is the better choice. But really, if you only intend to have the best light kit for travel or be able to shoot a bit of outdoors and wildlife, this 40-150 can't be beaten. I'm really more a wide angle person, and I got that lens as a front body cap for a 2nd hand E-M5. I intended to sell it quickly, but I made the mistake to try it. Long story short, I've still got it and I used it a lot while on vacations. Perfect to snatch you kid activities at the beach or things like that, beautiful colours and contrast, super fast and super accurate AF. Superb value, they go 2nd hand for their nib price (well, you can't really shave off a $99 lens anyway).

[@RobTrek]

I was torn about recommending a 1st lens, because I prefer primes myself. But I thought about when I was starting out, considering cost and versatility. Since the kit 14-42mm overlaps the primes, the added benefit of 150mm reach and macro (with tubes), I felt compelled to recommend this lens. Thanks for sharing your experience!

[@jonbarnard7186]

I've often wondered why this lens doesn't get more love. I guess it's because it's so cheap, people make assumptions about it. Most of the reviews do comment on it's sharpness though. It's a steal at $100. The other nice thing about this lens is how little it weighs. Yes it does have a plastic mount, and is mostly plastic or all plastic, but I used one for years and never broke it. To have the equivalent of a 300mm lens at just a few ounces makes this a great travel lens.

[@RobTrek]

Agreed! Thanks for sharing.

[@natashablanco-dominguez9883]

Another great video, Mr Rob, and I also loved the advice on the macro extension tubes. It turns out, unbeknownst to me, that I have a macro converter tube thingy...is this similar to an extension tube? I love my 40-150 lens, and now I'm even more excited about it. Looking very dapper in your pics too! PS I become almost suicidal when I try using photoshop...is Lighroom good enough to use on its own?!?

[@RobTrek]

Thanks! As for the tube thingy, it depends if it goes between the camera and lens or if it goes on the end of the lens. If it goes on the end of the lens, I don't recommend it unless it is an Olympus brand for quality. I got by with lightroom for most stuff, but need photoshop mostly for my pro work. You should be fine with lightroom only, but photoshop lets you get very creative.

[@natashablanco-dominguez9883]

@@RobTrek mr rob, I think the converter tube thingy goes on the end of the lens. It just screws in. Oh dear!!! I'll check the brand and if it's not olympus I'll get the extension tubes. Thank you for your advice re lightroom and photoshop. I hope I never have to use photoshop again 😂😂 however I've been trying to figure out how to pick out just one colour and do the rest of the image in black and white, and I haven't figured that in lightroom yet. Hope you're having a lovely weekend!

[@albertomatos-ferreira9757]

Dear Mr. Rob Trek Alberto Matos-Ferreira, I am a university professor of urology, retired, in Lisbon, Portugal. I have followed your lessons with great interest, which are very clear. I would like to know if it would be possible to obtain all the lessons, organized, on a DVD or other medium. I would also like to know if the 45 mm lens. f / 1.8 that advises can work in all service, as a universal lens, no more lenses are needed.

[@albertomatos-ferreira9757]

[e-mail]

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I don't have any other media available beyond youtube. The 45mm is a great lens. I can't answer if this is the only lens you need since every lens has a different purpose. Many recommend the 25mm f/1.8 and 17mm f/1.8 as well.

[@sarahje06]

Hi! Thank you for all you videos, especially the beginner serie which I just find excellent. Your explanations are very clear and helpful. I am mainly interested in landscape photography (mainly mountains) and would like to know if you have any suggestion for a wide angle lens at an affordable price. Thank you!

[@erayadiguzel3133]

Hello Rob thank you for all the videos that you provide. I am learning a lot from your videos... i want to ask you if you have any experience with panasonic 45-150 mm lens. Its similiar to okympus but dont know which one is better...

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. It's best to buy same brand lens for your camera. There are sometimes additional functionally and better performance when using Olympus with Olympus and Panasonic with Panasonic.

[@smkunder1]

Wow, you sure help, I have this lens and now I see it’s possibility. I have been putting off buying pro because of cost. Thanks

[@RobTrek]

It's a great lens!

[@lichtloper]

I'm afraid I don't have much luck with my 40-150, it's not really sharp and its contrast isn't very strong. I'm eagerly awaiting the F 4.0 version.

[@RobTrek]

The f/4.0 should definitely be superior!

[@robertcudlipp3832]

The 75 1.8 did, even to my faded eyes, have significantly better bokeh or background separation compared to the zoom. You would certainly hope so.

[@RobTrek]

Agreed. Questions is "Does it matter?".

[@rochester212]

Excelent work. I like the 40-150mm lens more. They're more expensive in my area, but i'il try to get my hands on one of these.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. It's a great lens.

[@DerVagabundli]

Go used. They can go as low as 35€.

[@trevb464]

Hey Rob. Been really enjoying your content on KZbin, very informative. Have recently bought an EM10 MKiv with the double zoom kit, so lots to learn! As suggested, I've purchased a cheap lens hood for the 40-150R. The one I bought is the tele lens hood (approx 35mm deep). Wondering if this is ok or should I have got the shallower version? Really appreciate your thoughts if you have a moment to reply. Atb Trev

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. The longer the better so long as you don't get vignette on the wide end.

[@trevb464]

@@RobTrek Thanks Rob 👍

[@flyfishnfoto]

Hi Rob, Thx another good video. I bought the 40-150 when Oly had a sale and then the 75-300 when that was on sale. Both are great lenses for the money. The majority of the photos on the Oly website are taken with the Pro lenses by the Oly visionaries. It is good to see the comparison between the cheaper lenses with the Pro lenses for those of us on a tighter budget. I don't understand why Oly don't advertise the quality of the other lenses rather than push the Pro lenses as most of us cannot afford the Pro lenses. The 'budget' lenses are generally lighter which is great when travelling.

[@RobTrek]

I suppose marketing has to push their very best products to be competitive with more expensive and larger systems. I'm just glad we have the low cost options. Thanks!

[@kevinwood9993]

Thank you very much for another super video, my wife and myself very much enjoy your relaxed and informative style. I wished id seen this before shelling out for the 60mm macro, I still may get this lens for my wife's pen f though, as it is small and lightweight. Do the extension tubes you have, have metal couplings or are they plastic? Once again thank you for all you hard work and time that goes into making this content. Regards KJ UK

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. The tubes are all metal.

[@mihask5681]

Thank you so much for your advice! I just got into photography with my em10 mark ii and this lense and I'm having so much fun with it. I would also love to have a pancake lense for street photography. Do you have any recommendations for that as well. Thank you very much!

[@RobTrek]

A budget choice would be the Panasonic 14mm f2.5 or 20mm f1.7 pancakes. The best is probably the Panasonic 15mm f1.7 or Olympus 17mm f1.8. Personally, I prefer the 25mm f1.8 but some find it too tight for street.

[@bobdrawbaugh4207]

Rob, the 40-150 is a great little lens. But, I think the 14-150 is a much better option. It not as cheap as the 40-150. I took my 14-150 on a few trips with the 17mm1.8 it was a great combo. I was more than Happy with the images from the 14-150.

[@RobTrek]

It's hard to find a bad lens from Olympus. I look at the 17mm f/1.8 time to time. Just a bit pricey for a focal length I have covered and don't use much. The 14-150 is a great option if you only want to carry one lens and a prime of choice.

[@FrankMorello69]

Hi Rob again a great video....I got the pancake 14-42 also the 12-40 pro and the 25mm prime and the 60mm prime/macro and the 14-150 what are your thought about this 14-150 4-5.6 ? Should I get the 40- 150 instead? Or is the quality similar to each other? I found the 14-150 the most handy lens on holidays....gets keep up the nice videos ...I've see them all ....very educational to explain how it all works....greetings .from.out Belgium

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I wouldn't bother with the 40-150. You've got the focal length and macro covered. Might want to consider the 7-14 or 75-300 next.

[@letni9506]

Love this lens. 40mm gets me some nice slightly zoomed in landscape shots and 150 has got me close enough to deer. I use tele converter mode or just crop for certain birds. Got some nice wild flower photos with decent bokeh. It's almost a do it all lens. Very compact and sharp enough for the small price it costs.

[@RobTrek]

Couldn't agree more! Thanks.

[@Pmor75]

It is a great lense, it was part of the kit for EM 10 MK III. Great video.

[@RobTrek]

Indeed it is! Check these out from Derek robtrek.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=63

[@Pmor75]

@@RobTrek Thanks. I enjoy to take mine EM 10 with the 40-150mm for walks in the forest, its so light and flexible lense, with weather sealing would be perfect....

[@valdiskrebs566]

Great review! How does this lens compare to the Olympus 14-150mm “travel lens”? Version II of the 14-150 is weather-proof, but what’s the difference in IQ between this “plastic fantastic” and the “travel lens”?

[@RobTrek]

I've read in various forums from users that the Version II is better. No way for me to test since I don't have the original.

[@valdiskrebs566]

Rob Trek Oops, sorry ... was referring to the current version II which is weather-sealed. If I have the kit lens and the fantastic plastic is it worth getting the ver II travel lens - just to avoid switching lenses out on a shoot? Will the ver II travel produce better IQ than my current combo?

[@markfung6418]

Another great vid Rob. Just wondering how you set focus on yourself? Did you use remote? Would you mind sharing? Many thanks! Mark.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I just uploaded the exact method I used to get focus.

[@markfung6418]

Thank you kindly!

[@romualdb5968]

Thanks for your video and your links. I'm new owner of an em-1 mk2. I ordered a used 40-150 and planed a 60mm but I ordered the two extensions tubes and hood. Can't wait to see that for macro... Thanks again for your videos 😁👍

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Glad to help. I love the extension tubes!

[@romualdb5968]

@@RobTrek hey Rob is the sun protection is size enough long? Cause some advices me maybe more this one : www.amazon.fr/dp/B07SC3WWZQ/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_i_Oz.ZEbYR9JCPN I wonder if the one you put in link is enough (cause I ordered it already)

[@RobTrek]

@@romualdb5968 The longer the better, but I found the one I use long enough and is easier to pack the lens. Long lens hoods usually need to be removed.

[@romualdb5968]

@@RobTrek thanks for your answer. I'll see when I'll receive it. I have ordered 45mm 1.8 for portrait and 40-150 for more distance (and now macro too 😁) are those lense enough good for video(mainly of my 4yo daughter playing) and everyday 's a picture or should I try a wilder angle to complete till 40mm?

[@RobTrek]

@@romualdb5968 You really need a wider lens. If you don't have the Olympus 14-42mm kit lens, the I can recommend the Panasonic 12-32mm kit lens.

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Thanks for the video, Rob. Have only recently come back to Olympus and still have Canon 6D FF and a range of Canon L and Sigma Art glass. FWIW, these lenses are very, very cheap. Canon L and Nikon Pro are, at least, 3 to 4 times the price. This slower zoom, is really a petty cash outlay, particularly given IQ.

[@RobTrek]

I know! I've spent more on filters for my Nikon glass than this lens costs.

[@eltinjones4542]

Have the LUMIX version because I have a LUMIX Gx7 camera. Wouldn't waste money on the pro lenses. Also find the kit 14-42 good enough. Added the Samyang 12mm f2 and 7.5mm f3.5 Fisheye to my collection. Brilliant lenses even for your Olympus camera 👌

[@RobTrek]

Love my kit lenses!

[@RobShootPhotos]

This is great stuff. if using the extension tube for macro photography is that good, I'll buy another 40-150 lens for $99 so I don't have to take them off. Looks like your affiliate links to the extension tubes aren't working.

[@RobTrek]

Thank you! I updated the link to show a list of tubes rather than a specific brand since they tend to change. The Meike brand that I bought is listed though.

[@wahabdilawar]

Excellent video, but I already have a Tamron 18-400mm VC for Nikon, which can be used on my Olympus O-MD EM10 II with the adapter...right? I was planning to get a Tamron 10-24mm VC for my Nikon, but I will try to fit it the Olympus 40-150 R lens in the budget. Patiently waiting for your tutorials about the video features of the Olympus O-MD EM10 II. You have a beautiful backyard. Thank you very much for your time and effort.

[@RobTrek]

I wouldn't bother adapting the 18-400 since you can't use the built in vc and changing the focal length settings for the in camera ibis everytime you zoom is a pain. If turn ibis off and use the old reciprocal rule for shutter speed, it's fine. The 10-24 could be a sweet combo. Ibis is less important and 10mm is plenty wide!

[@Hanswuerstl]

Great video, thanks. I was about to buy the 40-150 Pro lens. But after seeing your video I think I am gonna save some money, also it is ridiculously light compared to the pro lens. It is just the plastic feeling I have to get used to.....

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. I haven't bought the pro lens for the same reason. Don't want the extra weight.

[@lu965]

Great job on this video Mr. Rob. I have been struggling with what my next lens should be since I bought the mark ii with the 14/42 kit lens and I also bought the 45mm prime lens and I love both of them. They both take fantastic pictures with great colors. I would say that the 45mm took a little sharper pic and easier to get shallow depth of field because I like shooting that way. However, I have one problem with each of the lens. With the 45mm prime lens, the perspective is not wide at all. The subject appears much closer when using this lens and it won't focus if I'm standing within 50cm from the subject which could be annoying sometimes. With the 14/42 I find it still not wide enough because sometimes I try to take landscape (a lake). It can only get about 2/3 of the lake in the frame and the color is a little dimmer. I have been wondering if I should get the 40-150 lens. Would you say it is a good one to fill in the gaps i am having with the two current lens? And if you don't mind, could you pls tell me what macro extention tube that you used in this video?

[@RobTrek]

You should get the wide angle adapter for your 14-42 kit lens unless it is the one with the power zoom. Get the Olympus brand only. www.getolympus.com/us/en/accessories/lenses/wide-converter-wcon-p01.html The extension tubes will solve your problem with the 45mm so you can get much closer but you won't be able to focus far away. I don't have this lens so I can't tell you exactly. Here is the link to the extension tubes I use. Get the fotga brand ebay.to/2MxKCsd A good landscape lens is the 9-18mm from Olympus. A good macro lens is the 60mm f/2.8. These two lenses will be the best solution is money is no problem.

[@whakabuti]

Don’t forget that M43 cameras like the MK II have a crop factor of 2 Times. Therefore your 45mm is effectively a 90mm! If you’re looking for a wide lens look at the 17mm which is therefore 17 x 2 = 34mm.

[@guyracine7998]

Hanlu Ying Hi there. If you want to capture a wider angle for your shots, you need a wide angle. The 40-150 is the opposite, a telephoto. You would need something like the 9-18 mm to cover a larger view and possibly see the whole lake, or at least a bigger part of it. However this lens is a bit pricey.

[@lu965]

Thank you for the suggestion Guy. I am planning on getting a wide angle lens very soon.

[@lu965]

Thank you Rob.

[@rogerwest5597]

Just found your videos - brilliant - helping me to fathom out this great camera - already have the 40-150mm which I used in Nova Scotia for whales, puffins and eagles. Which extension tube should I use and will these increase the zoom capabilities - are these known as converters ?

[@RobTrek]

Hi, I have a vide on extension tubes. They are not "converters", but extend the lens from the camera that changes the characteristics of the image circle. You lose infinity focus but gain close focusing and magnification. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpnblJubYrdkl7s

[@seamuswarren]

Brilliant genuine real-world review. Saved me $$$.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks. Glad you saved some money!

[@seamuswarren]

Indeed. 👍🏼😜🙏🏼 At this point f/4.0-5.6 seems adequate as most of my image capture is under favourable lighting or long exposure.

[@hellsing0999999999]

Hi! How good are those extension tubes for the 14-42 EZ Kit Lens?

[@salmanshami]

Great video. I have this lens and like it a lot but was wondering if you have compared it to the 40-150 f2.8 pro. Would I see a big benefit with that lens? Also have you done a video on the Olympus 75-300 zoom. If not could you?

[@RobTrek]

Hi. I don't own the 40-150 pro so can't really compare. Ultimately the benefit of that lens is the fast f/2.8 and option to add a teleconverter. Sharpness will also be superior. Is the difference enough to justify the cost and does it matter? I can to a 75-300 review since it's a lens I own and enjoy. Thanks. -Rob

[@salmanshami]

@@RobTrek thanks for your reply. I'll look forward to that review.

[@AlexOmana]

just take one for 50$ used in adorama , i have the 12-40 2.8 pro and this 40-150 will be my second lens in 4/3 system the next maybe the 45mm f1.8

[@Eternai91]

Great video! This is actually the first lens I purchased and it has been great! I use it mainly for birds and other animals, but this helped me understand that I can use it for portraits, which is great! I have a question. Given a very small price difference, would you recommend switching from the EM 10 II to the EM 5 II? Also, do you happen to know if the EM 10 II has a AA filter? Keep up the great work!

[@RobTrek]

Thanks! EM5 is good for vlogging with flippy screen and mic jack. Also more rugged with weather sealing. I'd wait for an em5-iii for more significant upgrade. The differences are too small right now unless you need the features I mentioned.

[@haeysart.duncan]

ha! This vid just came right on time! I bought this lens not long ago and the Commlite 10 & 16mm extension tube arrived days ago too! Had never been so happy with all the experiments from them. Still trying to find out more possibilties with the EM10iii though because the features were a little different than the mk2 i think the olympus had simplifies some other features which I see different from your mk2. but anyway thank you for making the video! Keep up!

[@RobTrek]

I think I saw some of your work on instagram. Nice! Don't forget the lens hood.

[@BobK58]

Crispier? Thanks for taking the time to make these videos. I find them very helpful.

[@RobTrek]

Thank you!

[@ThePNWRiderWA]

A hidden gem is the 14mm Panasonic 2.5. Not a new lens ( came out in 2011 I believe) but a great IQ , compact and a great walk around lens. Easy to find used for around 100.00 or so.

[@RobTrek]

That lens was on my short list between the 12mm f/2.0 and 15mm f/1.7. I ended up with the 12mm f/2.0 because in video, the panasonic lenses didn't focus as fast on my olympus bodies. I still might pick one up because it is very cheap with great IQ. Thanks!

[@ordinosaurs]

I concur. This is really a great lens. My parents had bought a 2 lens kit GF2 way back when it was brand new, and this lens was included. I picked it someday to play around (I was rather happy with my P20/1.7 at the time), and I was floored by this tiny lump of plastic. To the point I've since then bought one, and sold the P20 in favour of the P25/1.7.

[@RobTrek]

Wow, I'm surprised you dropped the 20mm for this 14mm. I love the pancake lenses from Panasonic. I'd buy them if it were not for the slower focus in video on Olympus bodies. Still, the 20mm and 14mm are compelling because they are in the spirit of m4/3 compact size and quality IQ.

[@ordinosaurs]

As I said I prefer wide~ish FoV, and I don't do video. But anyway, the 14 is rather fast to AF unlike the 20 which misses the focus a lot. And as my eyesight is failing the older I get, I really need a reliable AF now. So after head to head testing, I found the P25 to be very fast, and very sharp if you take care of the focus shift below f/5.6. It's also inexpensive. All said, you can have a P14 and a P25 for the selling price a the P20 2nd hand alone. Honestly, the P20 was the best thing in MFT in 2009, but the hype around this lens is ludicrous today. But it's pocketable, which is still convenient.

[@sheriffnobel4274]

This is how to explain to people who have little knowlege a bout lenses 👍👍👍

[@RobTrek]

Thanks.

[@kcheg7957]

Hello Rob. I've had this lens for a while now and it has been fairly good. I'm just thinking about trying a teleconverter 2 with my lenses. Have you any experience with this. Most reviews are talking pro cameras so not helpful. I use an OMD 10 2 which is great but I find my existing lens falls short of some of the distances I have to deal with. Is a converter a better option than a longer telephoto. The telephoto lens are heavy and cumbersome so I thought maybe a converter might help. Your thoughts. Regards Ken

[@RobTrek]

Hi, Ken. The Olympus teleconverters only work with certain Pro Lenses. The lens is this video doesn't work with any of the converters. Your best option is maybe the Olympus 75-300 or Panasonic 100-400mm.

[@kcheg7957]

@@RobTrek Thanks Rob I will have a look at these. Have you seen a review on the Olympus version it seems to be a lower-cost unit? Regards Ken

[@RobTrek]

@@kcheg7957 In good light, this lens works well. Very sharp on the short end, gets softer after 200mm but still not bad.

[@yttean98]

Interesting video. Have you tested this old lens 9-18mm f4.0-5.6. it seems a good lens for I read a few reviews, my question would it be suitable for Street walkaround and landscape lens?

[@RobTrek]

I did look at one before buying the Panasonic 7-14mm. My main consideration was the wider angle for my real estate work. That said, I would prefer the 9-18 for its compactness and lightweight for street and landscape. Can't really speak personally to the image quality, but I wouldn't hesitate to buy it. I think micro four nerds did a review you can check out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jYu9dJ6ElLSMlZo

[@HOBUFFCOL]

Rob, Thanks for the info. I just purchased OMD Mark3. One of the lens was the 40/150 kit lens. I would like to get the Macro Extension tubes. There are a lot of sites with Macro Extension tubes with prices higher than the ones you showed. Where did you get yours?

[@RobTrek]

Got them on amazon. Here you go! Macro Extension Tubes: amzn.to/2IKD7g6 58mm Metal Lens Hood: amzn.to/2pJa97u

[@elaventurerosabe]

Great video. Very educational content. I appreciate it very much.

[@RobTrek]

Thanks for watching!