Rolex Explorer II - Which one is best?

Check out the Rolex Explorer II over at Chronext:
www.chronext.com/rolex/explor...
Best Rolex Explorer II
16570 vs 216570 vs 226570
What's the difference between Rolex Explorer II 216570 and 226570?
What's the difference between Rolex Explorer II 40mm and 42mm?
Ref. 16570
Launched in 1989
Diameter: 40mm
Movement: Cal. 3185 / 3186 automatic
Function: GMT/ Second Time Zone
Accuracy: COSC
Lume: Tritium / Luminova / Super Luminova
WR: 100m
Dial: Black or White
Ref. 216570
Launched in 2011
Diameter: 42mm
Movement: Cal. 3187 automatic
Function: GMT/ Second Time Zone
Accuracy: COSC
Lume: Chromalight
WR: 100m
Dial: Black or White
Ref. 226570
Launched in 2021
Diameter: 42mm
Movement: Cal. 3285 automatic
Function: GMT/ Second Time Zone
Accuracy: COSC
Lume: Chromalight
WR: 100m
Dial: Black or White
#Rolex #ExplorerII #barkandjack

[@BarkandJack]

Check out the Rolex Explorer II over at Chronext: www.chronext.com/rolex/explorer-ii?

[@ConceptQuad2]

@Adrian it would had been nice of you to display the transition model 16550 which in my humble opinion it most sought after cream -rail dial with big font numbers

[@SolidCaseBack]

I know you don’t set Chronext’s pricing, Adrian, but just in case some poor hapless viewer is tempted to give them £17,000 for a 226570, I feel obliged to mention that they could save seven grand and head over to Chrono24. Much as I love mine, £17k is a criminal price for one of these. As well you know.

[@BlondeDavey]

Chronext are way too expensive. Wouldn’t use them

[@JBGLX]

… favorite ? of course the 16570 🤷‍♂️

[@lassbk2]

Which Explorer model is on your wrist there? - Thanks

[@philwilson5610]

Can you do a submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner video ?

[@BarkandJack]

Done - kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqrNaoWgYt57Zrs

[@philwilson5610]

Outstanding service 😂

[@BabyKermit_]

@@BarkandJack Have you done the 114060 vs 124060?😊

[@tockingwatches2377]

😂

[@philwilson5610]

@@BabyKermit_this id like to see !

[@goldenarm009]

216570 was my grail, and after scraping and saving for years, and resisting the urge to scratch the itch with homages and cheaper options, it is now my daily. And I’m still so so so in love!

[@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky]

I have a question. That's 42mm right? Seeing that you wear it everyday I suppose the weight doesn't bother you. Are you able to comfortably wear it 6+ hours daily? I only ask because I recently went from a 40mm to a 42mm and I found the change of size and weight to be unfavorable for me. I like 42mm but I'm just wondering if in this specific case it might just be the watch and strap combination I have on it. I'm hoping I'd be able to find a comfortable 42mm. So far my 40mm is the only watch I can tolerate for 8+ hours. Thanks, Chris.

[@SolidCaseBack]

I’ve had my 226570 for over a year. I’ve come close to selling it twice because I found it heavy on the bracelet (although it’s fabulous on a NATO / MN / RubberB). Then I got a Black Bay Pro and realised just how well balanced and perfectly proportioned the Explorer II is and I haven’t looked back. Wearing it right now and loving it. I’d recommend trying and buying (although definitely not for the absurd £17k they’re asking for on Chronext).

[@joshs3916]

MN?

[@goldenarm009]

@@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky great question. I have a 7 inch wrist, so size-wise it is close to perfect, if a hair on the large size. 40mm is the sweet spot I think. But the indices and hands are larger too, which fills the negative space so much better than a lot of 42s, and is what I think I love most about it. It’s not a thick watch, def never use the word chunky to describe it as I would with 42mm tudors. Weight wise, it’s not an issue. It’s such a well balanced well proportioned piece, I have no problem wearing it on bracelet. So to sum it up and answer your question, it is a very comfortable daily wearer.

[@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky]

@@SolidCaseBackThank you for your response. It's interesting that sometimes it takes another watch to put things into perspective. That's happened to me a couple of times. It's a fun journey finding what fits! Yes, I'm looking into my first Rolex soon but I'm not sure I want to pay the premium for it. Of course with a Rolex, money shouldn't really be much of a deciding factor but the principal that these are selling 5k-to10k over dealer price is absurd.

[@AlbeeBarrett]

If the current gen was sized back down to 40mm it would be a no brainer

[@steveabplanalp1657]

I have the ref 16570 black dial circa 2009. The case is beautifully refined and the size is near perfect for every day wear. Having the 3186 also gives it GMT functionality which is a bonus. The ideal travel watch as it’s not showy at all.

[@user-qf4gf5zr4t]

Great video! In 2012 I bought a 2009 16570 off eBay for $2k, had it serviced, and it’s been running COSC ever since. The dimensions of the 40mm (it’s actually closer to 39mm) are perfect for my 6.75-in wrist. When Rolex came out with the 216570 I thought it was hideous. They really need to come out with a scaled back “retro” version like they did with the Explorer 1.

[@grantgray1759]

just paid $6k for a 2009 16570! Crazy that your asset appreciated 4k in that amount of time.

[@shanesnyder378]

I never planned to buy a Rolex, Omega in my eyes was the watch brand that I could love and afford. Now having multiple Speedmasters, a Black Bay & Santos on a whim I picked up a 16570 ver. 3. I can say it has become my absolute favorite watch. I took it off the bracelet and ordered an Everest strap but put it on a NATO while the strap was coming and it was a game changer. I've had the Everest strap sitting on my desk for months now, I just can't take it off the NATO. From someone who didn't love Rolex for many years, I am here to say the 16570 is a perfect watch.

[@chinwengkeong]

The 16570 has the most pleasing proportions to my eyes, especially with dial elements and hands. There are other improvements in the 3186 besides elimination of hand wobble. It has faster crown to quickset hour hand gearing, a lot less tedious when setting the date if you're off by weeks when setting the watch. It has a parachrom bleu hairspring as well. Basically it's the same movement that's in the ceramic gmt master IIs from 2005 to 2018

[@jordonfan1283]

Apparently some of those changes contributed to it being less reliable and harder to service than the 3185. Or at least that's what I heard from a watchmaker

[@chinwengkeong]

@@jordonfan1283 It's possible I suppose, but I don't think the ceramic gmts seemed to suffer any issues. Haha the watchmakers i know tend to bitch about everything but I love them!

[@johnnyguitar6697]

@@jordonfan1283 Yes, there's a write-up from a watchmaker on the internet explaining why the 3185 is more stable and easier to service.

[@oaktree1628]

@@johnnyguitar6697 what was the last year of the Explorer II with the 3185 movement?

[@johnnyguitar6697]

@@oaktree1628 2005, if my memory is correct

[@trinity3422]

I’ve had the pleasure of trying on the 16570 and although the GMT hand is shaky it’s such a great looking watch. I personally like the proportions on it more and I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist so I can fit a 42mm comfortably. Great video as always sir. Thank you!

[@Kessler296]

Love videos like this Adrian. You should turn this into a series and feature watches from different brands and do this history of them!

[@the.time.capsule.podcast]

would love to see one for the Pepsi. Especially with the color problems they had with it in the past.

[@TheShane209]

Been looking forward to this video since you said you were doing it. My grail is still the Explorer 1 but I love the whole range

[@drwindsurf]

Thank you for another brilliant video Adrian 👍 Personally, despite the technical improvements since, the 16570 is my favourite...but then again the 4 & 5 digit subs are my favourite too.

[@Ladyshaver]

07:15 Well I actually really like the scratchy sound when the rotor swings. The Seamaster 300M does this as well. In my opinion it adds to the feeling of owning a mechanical watch.

[@davidg4536]

Agreed

[@BLR653]

My 16570 polar dial is one of my favorite watches. Flys under the radar so well. The new model in black is stunning but the 42mm case is so clunky. If they did the 226570 in 40mm I would have bought one on day 1.

[@joshs3916]

The new Exp 2 is 🔥 The polar dial is great. The noise regarding the ball bearings isn’t bothersome

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Woooah! I love the edit Adrian!!! Edit. Sound effects. Watch. All on point.

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Did you hire an editer yet?!?! Or is this all Adrian barker goodness? I am living! 😊

[@BarkandJack]

@@BrittPearceWatches Yeah, my editor did this video. Really happy with it.

[@BarkandJack]

@@davidr2802 I think it's time you have a break from social media David, you're saying stupid stuff.

[@simopu]

Amazing video Adrian! Your videos got me obsessed with the explorer II and just bought a 16570!

[@Plally06]

Just got a call from Bucherer - the Explorer ii that I ordered - I've forgotten how long ago - has arrived. Colour me excited! Love this watch. Great vid Adrian.

[@acethis]

I love my 16570 Polar.. I have gotten it serviced by RSC and it's as good as new 😉 it oozes character and it's a keeper for sure. Appreciate the Vlog on the polar. Great content 👌

[@Shamallama25]

Been waiting for this video for some time now. Thank you.

[@wingeren]

Good shoutout to the SBGN003/005. I wear my 005 all the time (including right now) and it's such a fantastic piece. Lovely finishing, especially on the markers and case.

[@barrydonelan4284]

The Explorer II (White Dial) is my all time favorite. Yet again you do such a great job highlighting this great time piece. Loved the video. Well done.

[@mullman]

I’ve had all but the used 1655 I regrettably passed on in the late 90s. Love my 216570/226570 models. The Explorer 2 is my favorite watch. Born in 1971. Just like me. The last great tool watch.

[@OLMmedic]

Your vids are my fav adrian!! I always watch them with my sunday morning coffee

[@darellhunter2205]

Thanks Adrian, well done! I'm so excited to one day own the Polar. The 226570 is my favorite of the bunch. Hopefully next year I can add it to the collection.

[@kevinpriestly324]

Great video Adrian , like you I'm a massive explorer fan ,both the original explorer and the explorer 2 , I own a 214270 and I'm looking for an explorer 2 to keep it company in the watch box , I love the maxi case version ,the new version I don't like the noisy whind and the general lack of size on the wrist soim in the hunt ,best wishes from new Zealand

[@brunocda]

Great video as always. I have the last version of the 16570 (3186 and rehaut) and the 124270. Versatiles and discreets. A perfect two watch collection.

This is a great comparison, I finally took the plunge and recently bought the 216570 variation. Early days but so far love it!

[@_itskhanh]

love the depth of the video and the animation that comes with it

[@BarkandJack]

Thanks so much mate 🙌🏻

[@rodcarr3119]

My 16570 is still my favourite out of all my watches - a proper classic now, as it was when I bought it. Great vids - Cheers A

[@Hvam]

This was a much needed video for me, as I'm currently building up to buying an explorer. I think perfection for me would be the older 40mm dimensions, as well as the previous GMT hand in red, but with all the modern upgrades especially to the movement and bracelet/clasp. However your rundown on the newest version, especially regarding the "fit", has got me back interested. Will go and try the 226570 on next week. If I do end up with one, I'm absolutely fitting it on an aftermarket rubber bracelet. I stumbled upon the company "Rubber B" - do you have any experience with their products? And a bonus question, what tools/toolset would you recommend having for switching bracelet/strap?

[@SignalCorps1]

RubberB make great products. Stick to the 16570, it’s far more versatile and it will likely become your daily watch. I bought one new back in 2001 and its been my daily ever since, despite trying new watches along the way.

[@tmwams]

I’m wearing my 16570 right now and pretty sure my love for it (& purchase) was influenced by your early videos Adrian! My only criticism of the newest model is that they didn’t add a quickset date (same goes for the GMT Master). When I pick this out of the box and it’s 15 days wrong, it’s really a pain in the arse to set!

[@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky]

Oh man, do you have to go through the full 24 hours to change it? That's kinda miserable 😅 I'd be tempted to leave the date wrong lmao.

[@russellis6993]

Are you serious? ... it takes seconds !! just pull out the crown to position 1 and spin the hour hand round and the date soon moves on .. almost as fast as a quick set.

[@lettuce1305]

most GMT watches don't have quickset date and I actually prefer it that way

[@MARKO2465]

@@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky FIRST world problems..... I love mine.

[@oskartornvall1596]

226570 - I got it just a few weeks ago, and I am almost surprised to realize that it is just superb. The suttle changes has made it into a monster, in a good way.

[@pureblood8307]

When the Rolex Explorer 1655 was first marketed, the second hand was straight and unremarkable, but the extra hour hand was a bright orange, giving this particular version of the watch its name. In 1974, Rolex added a luminous circle to further aid in seeing the time in the dark and, after 1975, the extra hour hand was painted a bright red, although collectors still refer to this version as the “orange hand” Explorer. The watch was produced until 1985 when it was discontinued from the Rolex lineup.

[@johnnyguitar6697]

The 1655 was produced until 1984, after which it was replaced by the 16550. I have seen 16550's with serial numbers dating it back to 1984.

[@seagaln]

Just got mine. 226570, love this Watch! And this video is the best I’ve seen about the Explorer II and comparison between models. Thanks and congrats for the great videos!

[@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky]

This thumbnail was legendary. Great content as always friend. I enjoy watching you watch watches while I watch my own watch.

[@edwardshoesmith255]

I have a small wrist and love the explorer line, unfortunately the 42mm models are just too big for me…..so I’ve had to settle on a 1976 1655 instead. Love it, I think it’s the most unique vintage Rolex out there.

[@golfwitharpad]

❤what a great video ! I'm such an explorer fan ... had the old version 40mm my very first Rolex and just picked up the new bad boy Explorer 2. Only waited 3 months .. wohooo... this is a kick ass watch. Thanks again for the info makes me feel like I have the perfect watch. Keep the amazing videos coming. Also I just got the No date Submariner... wow that is beautiful can't take that one off my wrist ... need to give the explorer some love again.

[@darshanmalde497]

I tried on the current version of Rolex Explorer 2 the 42mm one. To me the orange hand felt a bit cartoony. Also felt too big for an everyday watch on my 6.5in wrists. Huge fan of the 16570 40mm version as it’s the perfect size. Of course I’d prefer the updated movement and stuff but a fusion of old and new would be ideal for me :)

[@ChrisJohnson-yw2ky]

I'm the same way. Wore a 40mm for the past 8 months but decided to try on a 42mm. The small change in size and weight just didn't work for me. I can only wear it for about 4 hours till it starts to bother me. My wrist fluctuates between 6 5/8 - 6 3/4. For me at least, 40mm seems to strike the perfect balance of size, weight, and wearability. I do have a Tag Heuer that I really love that's a 38mm. I also have a vintage Omega Seamaster that's a 36mm. Looks kinda tiny but it's super comfortable.

[@feehan84]

I convinced myself that I needed to get the 124270 over the 114270 because of the technical advances with the movement, better bracelet, lume, etc. It did nothing for me. Switched to a 114270 where for me the dial proportions are perfect and the other stuff doesn’t matter. Actually. The older watch keeps better time than the newer one 😀

[@adrienc5879]

Great video and content. It is a shame you "only" reviewed the white/polar dial. The "original" black one is the same watch but in the end a very different one. Especially when you compare the 216570 and the 226570, the changes to the dial and the hands completely upgraded the watch in my opinion.

[@deucecaddy]

Finally pulled the trigger and got the 226570, and it really is cracking hot watch. Thank you for the in depth review it really helped me choose the right reference.

[@pkoster5874]

I have the polar 226570 on the wrist for almost a month now I love the watch. This watch and especially the dial looks so much better in the flesh then on videos or pictures. It wears really comfortable too. It has a toolwatch vibe but also looks luxurious. Great watch!

[@JHDC1959]

Adrian, love the vids. Humble suggestion: leave the tech specs on screen a little longer.

[@davidg4536]

My first & only Rolex so far is a black 226570. I love it. Watching this vid makes me want a polar too! I do find that I have to wind it more than I was expecting. I wear it daily but I have a desk job. Maybe that’s why. Maybe you can only expect to get 70hrs if it’s fully wound? I also am paranoid about screwing the crown back down. I usually back threads out until I find where they engage before tightening. Can’t really do that since there’s outward tension on the crown. So, other than my obsessive tendencies & incredibly-high expectations for everything, I love my EXP2!

[@kernlee]

Super fan of your videos and the explorer & explorer 2. Thanks for clarifying the difference between the two recent additions. To the novice it’s identical, but truly so different. Thanks from singapore

[@goodthiefphoto]

Thanks for this info - it definitely helps! I've always wanted an Explorer II and hopefully one day I'll get one. My favourite was with the red hand but having seen the orange in real life, I have a new grail watch!

[@jwdepriest]

I LOVE my ExpII. I have the 216570, and I probably think the 22570 is my favorite, but I only want one and this one already has so many great memories to consider upgrading.

[@therapiststeve3294]

Been waiting for this one. The Explorer II, Polar is absolutely my next Rolex. Love it, especially at 42mm (I've got a big wrist). With very few exceptions I like the most modern edition of a watch. I'm not one for vintage unless it's a watch I already owned before it was vintage.

[@RyanChapmanFilm]

The explorer range was never on my raider until I came across this channel 🙏🏻 Now I want an Explorer I and II 👌🏻

[@silveriver9]

👍

[@arifabdullah7142]

When you said about the old Explorer II 9:04, it made me changed my mind totally... Now i'm in love with the 16570 ... thank you

[@krishnar3493]

One of your best videos. Thank you, B&J.

[@fruit_goose]

Had both 16570 and 216570. Sold the latter after two months, it was better in every way on paper but I enjoy the 16570 much more. Great review 👍

[@ludwigrbds5522]

my absolute Favourite watch, funny you would make a Video just now

[@AmazingMaxStuff]

Awesome informative video, thank you Adrian! Those prices on Chronext are lit🔥

[@kareemmansur5512]

As always such great content! You keep swaying more and more to a decision to pick up an explorer II

[@britnfl9706]

Great vid Love my 226570 just a quick question whats your fave nato strap colour, cant decide which to purchase seen the grey that you have sported but tempted on orange?

[@goatrope2946]

I really enjoyed this video. It does a great job of laying out the evolution of the Explorer 2. I'm 2 months into pestering my local AD for one. Question: What is all the chatter about 32xx movements having accuracy problems? I've read about fixes being applied by Rolex during warranty repair, only to have the issue recur. Perhaps it's only those shut-in horologists, sitting in the lotus position with their timegrapher, for days on end? Have you heard anything about this??

[@david300m]

Great info and eye-candy. Almost bought the Explorer in the early 2000's. Looking back w regret. 😆 Thanks for sharing

[@andrehiller6682]

Great Video. Would like to see a true hands-on Video of the BB Pro anytime soon. Keep up the great work Adrian!

[@fresnochris88]

I have a polar 216570 and dig this piece. biggest design difference is in the black dial. The 22 no longer has the gmt ghost hands which is a huge nod to the 1655. The discontinuation also happened the year of the pandemic, which i think is kinda cool history in the making. I feel like people are so focused on the polar that they sleep on this detail that is in my opinion going to be collectible down the road.

[@gezc16b]

Definitely agree with this - this is alias my opinion on the black dial. Absolute sleeper.

[@lettuce1305]

Yeah I'm probably in the minority here, I actually like the 216570 better than the 226570 for both the black and polar variants. For the black dial, I love the fact that the "ghost" hands that is a throwback to the old 1655, I reckon serious Rolex enthusiasts love this touch. For the polar, I actually prefer the glossy black hands that work so well with the porcelain white dial. But yeah can't go wrong with either the 21 or the 22.

[@jimlittle5769]

I have the most recent one and it's my favorite watch in my collection. Great video Adrian!

[@DDelacruz128]

Your content continues to be superb. Can you please make a video explaining the watch movement hierarchy? Your video on the BR05 touches on this a bit. This is a watch I want but think its overpriced. In short, What movements justify a higher price?

[@watchmystuff2487]

Love this watch - helped me fall into the wrist watch rabbit-hole!

[@anthonyvavrica5602]

Great video. One question, can you provide the info for the nato straps that were shown on the 226570 ref please?

[@bryanpennington7851]

Exceptional content, as usual Adrian. Keep up the great work.

[@chaitanyakonduru2271]

When the GMT hand goes over 3'O clock, does it not cover up the date for almost an entire hour? I tried the black dial one in an AD where I live and it was coincidentally during that time when the overlap happened. I liked the previous Explorer's GMT hand which is smaller and does not cover up the date window anytime. What are your thoughts about it?

[@reallocaluser4081]

Great video. What are some good straps to get for the 40mm?

[@xmuninu]

I still prefer the old 40mm version. My 1997 white dial Explorer II was stolen a few years ago and , as I looked for a replacement, I decided to buy the black dial version. I find it more versatile to wear than the white dial ever was.

[@wisamal-hakim5531]

For an outdoor watch this thing is crazy good. I remember in a prev video you described the overseas Everest dual time. That’s unattainable. Is there anything in between that you would recommend even higher than the explorer 2?

[@giacomogalbiati3734]

Loved the explorer 2 since highschool, still waiting to pick one up! Need to save up a few more money 😬

[@Leturane]

Finally got my Mk-IV Polar 16570 with the 3186. I went over budget a bit but I been kicking my self for a long time when these were like 4-5K usd so I have to do it this time no regret so far

[@marcgirard7551]

Great video! I like the previous Subs (circa 2010) much better than the current ones. The new Explorer II is the best in my opinion

[@TheCooliodad]

I was extremely fortunate to pick up a 226570 from an AD three weeks ago. It's the perfect companion to the Batman!

[@alectang1614]

Interestingly, the new black dial 226570 has a gloss dial and the older 216570 has a matte dial, which is opposite of the white dial. I also miss the old floating hands for the older black dial model. For me, the older 216570 is the closest to the original 1655 model.

[@user-gv2qx1je1m]

226570 has a matte dial, not a glossy one

[@alectang1614]

@@user-gv2qx1je1m no, it has a glossy one. The black dial I am referring to.

[@booneguy]

You are very informative. I appreciate your videos.

[@NicholasOdinson]

Hmmm… I’d go with the Explorer 2. Thank you for the clarification Adrian 🍻

[@MikesAdventures44]

I love my explorer ii, 40mm z serial from 2008 with black dial, 3186 movement and engraved rehaut. 👏 amazing, do everything watch.

[@ronenash3487]

I have a 16570 with 3185 movement and I noticed that after full service the hour hand snaps into place much more accurately than previously. I am guessing Rolex are updating this mechanism at service to be similar to the 3186. Not sure if anyone can confirm this.

[@josephcavallaro4835]

Great video!! love it! Yep I’m a huge fan of explorer 2 too.

[@watchesoutwalking687]

The new ball bearings for the rotor, is it noticeable on the wrist? Cheers

[@OneManReviews]

I love the older (vintage) version of the Explorer II. Just a perfect and refined watch. The new one looks great also, but 42mm makes them a big watch.

[@Gearsandco]

I hate it when Rolex Keeps making bigger and bigger watches, I wish the explorer II goes back to 40mm or even come up with a 38 39mm whatever it is. After trying all the rolexes the only one that really hit me wast the Explorer 36mm in their current lineup.

[@brendanirwin]

Grey jumper and Explorer II…couldn’t be a more Adrian video. Love it 😅

[@andrewbarnes5802]

Didn't know about this watch until I watched you collection video earlier today or, or Chronex until now..... I love it! Add another Rolex to my collection of "that's rather nice"

[@TheMarinheiro14]

Awesome video Adrian. I, for one, am good with Explorer II vídeos

[@Aliassuk]

Greetings from Glasgow! Great video! Please please please, how can I purchase the book behind you with the white dial explorer? Many thanks!

[@tockingwatches2377]

I’m seriously considering the new Explorer 2. I had the previous generation but sold it during an H Moser / Panerai kick. Looking back, it was a great watch.

[@andypandy4987]

Great reminder of the differences between models - that latest Exp 2 polar is my favo7rite.

[@Herbf173]

Cheers Adrian love the vid and I've just pressed go on the 16570 can't wait for her to arrive

[@joshuakaplan5726]

Should have also mentioned the Tudor BB Pro! Maybe do a comparison video of the BB pro against thr 1655, 16750, and 226570? The polar 226570 was my grail for a long time, but couldn't afford (nor get a wifey green light) for a $9500 watch, especially after getting the blue Omega SMP 300M and racing green/leather strap IWC Pilot's Chronograph 41 all in the same year. At some point the green light was given for the BB pro and I got it and love it as the 1655 homage no-nonsense gmt explorer tool watch that it is. Also fits lime a dream at 39mm when my omega is also a 42 just like the exp2, and I don't find it too thick at all since my IWC is also thiccc boi at 14.5mm. Would love to see more BB pro vs. Exp2 content!

[@CaliberandCamber]

Slender wrist here. 16570 is by FAR the most comfy watch I own. Love the size, never going to give it up ❤

[@willchung2072]

Explorer II and GMT master II have quite similar feature, which one would you choose?

[@MikeyAnalog]

16570 black dial for me. It's my grail watch and will round out my 4 watch collection along with my 5 digit DJ36, Seiko SBP143 and G-Shock DW5600BB. Great video!

[@boylanor6900]

I have a '98 vintage 16570 and love it's proportions.Never missed a beat,serviced once.The latest looks a bit Fisher-Price..

[@notazip6814]

Finally! Thank you I’ve wrecked my head trying to get this ! 😊

[@glaglouel3561]

hey guys, i've heard abt a porcelain dial explorer II, but im not so sure if this refers to the material of the dial or the color. Do anyone know abt this model ? Thx

[@didrikbjella4856]

Fantastic video! Any chance you do a similar on the Omega speedmaster 57’ and it’s history?😊

[@warrenmarcos]

Hi adrian. Since you love the explorer II, maybe you can do a video about the 16570 that came out before the rehaut models but having a 3186 movement instead of the 3185. Some say they are just 2% of the production between late 2007 to early 2008. Cheers.

[@fpl66]

Have the 226570, so happy with that. Use almost everyday

[@river1duck]

I actually own both dial colors of the 216570 maxie case. While I do not regret buying either one, I do find myself wearing the new 36mm Explorer more than other watch.