Rolex Submariner 16610, Is it the perfect one watch collection?

[@singflorent]

Agreed, aluminium bezel look much nicer than ceramic, case size is just perfect.I sold my 41mm no date and going to buy this 16610 suit my small wrist.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Ceramic is Shiny and looks expensive. Aluminum is elegant and charming. I will be comparing soon this Rolex to the Omega seamaster of the same era. I previously owned ceramic seamaster professional and another master co-axial. Still I prefer this older aluminum seamaster.

[@singflorent]

@@thepickyreviewer agree with u , I think it’s all the depend on our watch journey :)

[@robotstobor3388]

I have the LV and it is the most versatile watch I have, Rolex got it spot on with this model. However those were the days when ADs had them in stock, no waiting list or grey market for the flippers. Great video, keep up the content.

[@thepickyreviewer]

I was worried the LV won’t be as versatile although it’s like it gets the best of both worlds with that maxi dial and still the refined elegant case design. Hearing from you made me want to give it another shot.

[@q3813]

I bought a 16610(1992) a week ago and I'm wearing it 24/7. Life is short. 😅😅😅

[@thepickyreviewer]

What a journey 😍 wear it in good health for years and years to come 😇

[@lexurious2227]

4 yrs ago, i bought a 1996 W series 16610 T

[@thepickyreviewer]

@@lexurious2227 They are lovely and a pleasure to wear 😍

[@thomasf.4687]

I own one from 93 bought it at the age of 23.still a classic, greetings from Germany

[@dennischen8887]

I got mine for 4 grand a couple years after it came out. Recently fell back in love with this watch.

[@frederickboulton8501]

High quality video! My father had the same watch from the late 90s. My mother keeps it in a safe, one day, maybe when i get married, I will feel honored to wear the watch.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Yes wait for the right moment, wear it safely then put it back in safe. Mine got stollen one month ago but managed to get it back thank God. I bought a safe after 😅.

[@Kamrransafi]

which year is this? is it 1996 one or 2002?

[@bige311]

I own the 2022 126660 DSSD all black. It is a beast.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Beautiful, elegant sporty beast 😍

[@larryp.450]

As a 16610 owner, the answer is yes it is.

[@thepickyreviewer]

I love it 😍

[@DAVD305]

🧛‍♂️ loves 16610

[@ccw5886]

My 16610. Is now 30 years old and has only been serviced once in all that time. Still only +1 every day

[@thepickyreviewer]

Mine just got serviced and it’s perfect now. Glad yours is working perfectly too 🤗. If you don’t wear it frequently I recommend you get a safe coz mine was stolen three weeks ago but thank god we managed to get it back 😊

[@rabtrekker]

BB54 & 5000U is a killer combo for a 6.5" wrist!

[@thepickyreviewer]

Absolutely!

[@williamkhsu4]

What model Seiko is that in the open? Very nice

[@thepickyreviewer]

Thank you 😇 This is Seiko SPB239.

[@brasso9393]

Its a nice watch but on smaller wrist the clasp just don’t sit centre on the back of wrist which bothers some.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Just make sure it’s centered even before you wear the watch. Number of links on both sides to be balanced first 👍

[@brasso9393]

@@thepickyreviewer nah.. do some research and you will know.

[@thepickyreviewer]

@@brasso9393 I have the watch in hand and my wrist is 6.75 inch. This is actually the best submariner for small wrists along with the no date version which has female endlinks 😇

[@brasso9393]

@@thepickyreviewer i hv a two liner 14060M . The 5 digit bracelets clasp dont sit centre on my 6.5 inch wrist. Many hv inverted it to make it sit centred but need to get used to opening the clasp. The info is all over Rolex forum btw

[@thepickyreviewer]

@@brasso9393 Dear try to remove one link from one side and add to the other side of the clasp. It’s the total length of the links on both sides that determines how centered the claps is. If one side is longer the clasp will never be centered.

[@Sams911]

while I like this model, I owned one back in the 90's... The newer ones, especially the 3235 movement models, are just better watches.. they've really upped their game, quality and kept the classic look... they're basically perfect now.

[@thepickyreviewer]

I must disagree. Design wise from an engineering point of view this model has better ergonomics. Or maybe it’s my smaller wrist 🙈😅. About the movement, power reserve doesn’t mean a lot to me. My datejust 41 with the 3235 had a noisy rotor compared to this older 3135. The bracelet unjustified increase to 21mm add nothing to the watch but extra weight. Removing the chamfer at the case sides, which Tudor has now, took away some of the design elegance and charm.

[@scoobydooby9151]

3235 movement better? Only time will tell. Multiple stories about loosing time and no fix in sight. Bigger and flashier is not always better. I like the 5 digit subs better.

[@Sams911]

@@scoobydooby9151 the two I own with 32XX movement are both consistently -2 seconds a day...

[@rafaeloliva6425]

Agreed, the ceramic variants are superior in every measurable metrix.

[@nashwahammad7251]

This watch's beauty alone is subjective ❤ great pick!

[@elwynll]

I picked up a 16610 (2008 M serial with engraved rehaut) last month but am having trouble loving it. I was tossing between 16610 vs 116610LN and opted for the 5 digit, for many reasons such as the smaller profile (i have smaller wrists 6.5inch~ ). However the bracelet, clasp are huge improvements on the newer references and although the 16610 bracelet is light I still have issues with the fitment especially with the fixed links on the 6 o'clock side, not to mention its very flimsy design in comparison to the new 116610LN. I also prefer the maxi dial and prefer it to the 5 digit. I agree the supercase lugs are too fat but am not sure if I'll end up trading the 5 digit for 6 digit.. I know the 5 digits are no longer available and a lot more nostalgic, classic vintage proportions, and may even be more collectable (arguably).. but for daily comfort fit n finish I dont think there is a comparison. Help me love the 16610 !

[@thepickyreviewer]

You said it all right. No watch is perfect. You buy what suits you more and what makes you feel good and happy. You are paying a lot of money so it better makes you happy or she goes 😇

[@thepickyreviewer]

A friend of was in the same situation. He bought the 6 digit then bought a budget friendly build as a beater for that nostalgic feel 😇 check momods @instagram

[@elwynll]

@@thepickyreviewer Thanks for your reply. I am still undecided on whether I should change for a 6 digit SubC. One thing I've learnt in watch collecting is if you're unsure, don't do anything. Patience really is a virtue lol

[@BAB00215]

Do they still have the 16610 submariner at Rolex stores?

[@thepickyreviewer]

No, it has been discontinued.

[@ahmedelgamassy4567]

Nice video. Do you think that the newer bracelet of 116610 can fit in this model? I heard it can

[@thepickyreviewer]

I believe it does, I will confirm back as soon as I can. You can just take the clasp with one link on each side and screw it to the older bracelet. I am currently in Cairo btw.

[@benediktlinek]

@@thepickyreviewerhi, do you have an update for me?

[@Convertible420]

I have the Tudor Submarine 79190 from 1995 and its beautiful, in my opinion the perfect alternative. I prefer the matt dial and tritium

[@thepickyreviewer]

I agree they have got the same vibes 😍

[@M123OCT]

What is the music at the beginning of the video? It's beautiful.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Beautiful voice too 😊 Rim Banna wait for me

[@M123OCT]

@@thepickyreviewer Thank you, I'll check it out. It reminded me immediately of much of the beautiful Spanish music I enjoy. 👍

[@heechris]

Great content, do you think it's worth to purchase this reference now? What's your advice?

[@thepickyreviewer]

Check the 16610, 116610 & 126610 in person and choose the one you like the most. Mostly check the looks and the fit on your wrist. This is the most important thing. 1-Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In my eyes I love this reference design more than the current 126610. It is so charming, slim, elegant and durable. 2-This model is not produced anymore, not like the newly available reference which is in continuous production. I think it makes more special as the number of good quality pieces will be less and less overtime.

[@1000lightyrs]

Thanks for the video. I owned a 14060m and never really bonded with it. Was always curious about the 16610 and hunted for the right one for literally years. Eventually was super lucky to find a near NOS condition random serial version. I bonded with that one instantly. I really prefer the look of the watch with the date. I have owned it for over a year now and still quite infatuated by it.

[@thepickyreviewer]

A perfect watch can’t be a time only watch 😉 I must admit I love to look at no date watches but I miss the date every time I look at it specially on working days.

[@madprod3696]

La seul que je garderais si je devais faire un choix

[@krishnar3493]

Congrats. Great watch.

[@IamME1220]

The perfect alternative is Tudor BB58 😉

[@thepickyreviewer]

The watch I love the most that is not in my collection…Yet! 😉

[@oldmanswatch6300]

I find that Submariner 41 mm and BB58 39mm is the perfect 2 watch collection

[@steveweiss8337]

Or any seadweller or deepsea or gmt , gmt ll I think they’re all good for a one watch collection 😊😊😊😊

[@thepickyreviewer]

So true but depends on wrist size too 😉

[@steveweiss8337]

@@thepickyreviewer true

[@fb7997]

good video! i like this older model too..

[@thepickyreviewer]

Me too so much. This was the peak of Rolex design supremacy.

[@wristshotter7832]

Great review - Looks superb on your wrist 👌 Value for money wise I'd recommend the Ceramic Seamaster 41mm with an updated clasp or a Tudor BB58.

[@thepickyreviewer]

I totally agree value for money wise. Used to own SM professional and my only complain was the bracelet.

[@rafaeloliva6425]

Negative, the Omega is cheaper, but not a better value. Rolex has much better brand prestige and recognition. It buy far and away will sell much faster , with unmatched value retention. Omega just can't match Rolex on those measurable metrix. Don't conflate cheaper for better value.

[@davidroth5056]

I own the 16613 and I love it :)

[@thepickyreviewer]

I bet you are 🥰😅 that luxury royalty blue

[@iconicetiquette4546]

Im glad i own one😀

[@thepickyreviewer]

It is the best submariner in my opinion.

[@racebannon2332]

The Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 or 116600, explorer 39 w/ full lume are the perfect Rolex timepieces

[@thepickyreviewer]

I love the explorer it’s almost perfect but I know I will miss the date function. The sea dweller is special too and I appreciate the no cyclops look but the thickness is its Achilles heal.

[@rafaeloliva6425]

Not even close, the ceramic variants are superior in every objective matrix. The stamped clasp, hollow link stretch and scratch prone aluminum bezels where weakness that the new model corrected. The only appeal would be an emotional nostalgic feeling for the 5 digit reference. The other reason would be that you are diminutive in stature and build, and need a dainty wearing watch.

[@-Medici]

😂😂😂

[@derekflannagan9102]

I have one in my small Rolex collection

[@thepickyreviewer]

Still my personal favorite to date 😍

[@watchscope]

Great video ⌚ ⏱ 🕛

[@thepickyreviewer]

Thanks bro 🤗

[@brian91145]

I’m 1 and done with my explorer 1

[@thepickyreviewer]

I still have the though to replace the sub with an explorer to date 🤷🏻‍♂️ got a modded seiko explorer to test first 😅

[@mboydatlanta1]

I have this watch. I purchased it in 2005. I prefer it over the ceramic face because it's more elegant and it doesn't have that shiny dial like the ceramic.

[@thepickyreviewer]

Exactly, this is the era of Rolex when they used to focus on superior designs. As an engineer I see it’s beautifully designed not only for the looks but also the level of comfort.

[@thepickyreviewer]

How many times your 2005 watch went to service?

[@mboydatlanta1]

I've had my watch serviced once. I had it serviced about 2 years ago. It was around $1000 to get it serviced.

[@thepickyreviewer]

@@mboydatlanta1 Thank you so much for the information, gotta prepare myself. Mine is a 2006 model.

[@the_shadow_realm5110]

A watch made for hunks. Worn by hunks.

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

The current 12 series sub is far, far superior.

[@thepickyreviewer]

On paper yes 🤷🏻‍♂️ but design ergonomics I must say no. It also depends on the wrist size. Rolex sacrificed the size and weight of the bracelet for the sake of the 41mm case diameter increase. And for those who still want slimmer and lighter submariners they can still buy the older models from the market 👍

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

@@thepickyreviewernot just “on paper.” The build quality of the ceramic submariners is simply superior to the pre ceramic submariners. This is just a fact. I’ve never been a fan of the supercase 11 series subs. The proportions were just off. But the current 12 series submariners have proper proportions and the quality blows away a pre ceramic sub. As far as size goes, we are talking about 1/2 mm difference.

[@thepickyreviewer]

@@whereRbearsTeeth you notice the size and weight when you try them both. The new submariner bracelet is 21mm width with a bigger clasp. It all adds to the weight and the way it wears. I am not saying the modern is worse. Both are amazing both have their places in the market. Taste changes by time 😇 🙏

[@kraquin]

I went with the two line 14060m ...... doesn't have that obnoxious cyclops nor date, it has minimal script on the dial, the bezel isn't cheap looking shiny ceramic, and the rehaut doesn't have the pretentious ROLEX engraved all around it (I know what watch I'm wearing).

[@thepickyreviewer]

The 14060m feels even more original than mine. I won’t call the ceramic look cheap 😅 but it just doesn’t have the charm, different vibes not favorite to me. I love that no date but I am afraid I will miss the date every time I look at it 🙈.

[@AGC828]

Has to do more with horse é will wear it.. For what not an everyday watch as there's the risk of being mugged.... If the Cyril believes it's a real Rolex

[@thepickyreviewer]

Believe it or not the risk for me existed in my own house when it got stolen 😢😔 but retrieved thank God 🙏😍😅

[@a156566]

Don’t try at home

[@thelurkinggod8685]

A beautiful watch but cringe at that crusty green sticker touching skin

[@thepickyreviewer]

This watch has seen a lot of soap and water 😅 maybe I should remove it all together.

[@heathwoodruff6975]

Explorer 1 kills this for everyday watch. Sorry. Looks sub par with business casual and professional. Sub KILL explorer for casual and sporty wear, though.

[@thepickyreviewer]

I didn’t know how to respond because I looooooooove the explorer, huge fan here. I somehow agree, in the end it’s more about what suits your life style more. if I am going to choose only one watch it’s the sub. I prefer the overall design add to that the timing bezel and date function. I still wish to add an explorer to my collection.

[@heathwoodruff6975]

@@thepickyreviewer that's why it's fashion and lifestyle my friend. I know you walk around looking FANTASTIC in your beautiful Sub. Just my opinion if i only had one. The time bezel im sure is helpful and fun to play with (makes it more interesting) Wear that sucker!

[@oldmanswatch6300]

Explorer is the king 🤴

[@cocoathefunnydoggo1627]

@@oldmanswatch6300it’s only the “king” because you have one and aren’t planning on buying or can’t afford to buy a sub. Explorer is the most entry of entry level watches.