Roman catholic claims against Orthodoxy refuted. Part 1: Papal claims 

This video should basically disprove, or at least combat the things Roman Catholics say about Holy Orthodoxy regarding church leadership. If you want me to do a part two regarding more evidence, I will.
Part two will be about the filioque  

[@ryanchicago6028]

Is St. Augustine pretending to be Dumbledore? He's pulling his heart out of His head! Or, was this all down at the Aeropagita?

[@arminkleinke-manner9453]

"First mong equals" given the roman context of primus inter pares with Augustus this implies heavily supreme rule. Also your council-quoting is a bit lackluster: Those decrees you are quoting have they been ratified by the Pope (otherwise how do you know which council is valid and which isn't? - or do you chose for yourself, like a heretic)? Otherwise that Council decree is just that, a non-binding majority oppinion, like the whole heresy of Arianism. Nothing much to say on the quote-mining of the church fathers as I would have to look inzo the context, but given the fact, that Jesus himself made Peter HIS representative and not the representive/face of the apostles like you claim he is, the catholic propostition still stands. He gave him the keys of the kingdom, which means he is the 2nd in command and chief in command in the absence of the king, according to the old testament. Nothing about primus inter pares here. Jesus even directly negates that base notion by later saying that whoever is the greatest shall be the servant of all. So nothing about equality. Please my fellow orthodox christians: don't forget that you are in schism and denial of the council of Ferrara-Florence which was accepted by all the orthodox bishops, though one bishop retracted later on and was instituted by the Ottomans as Patriarch (for which later you developed that weird doctrine of a council must be accepted by the whole church to be valid, what no one ever believed in church history before). Thus you are in schism with the last Roman Emperor, with the last Patriarch of Constantinople, who was not invested by the persecutors of our brethren, all the last bishops of the Roman Empire. You are that remnnt of the orthodox church, that the enemies of Christ kept divided from the one true church due to your pride. You chose slavery under the enemies of Christ over our Lord.

[@byzantineapologetics]

We don’t have the same God. I would rather be a martyr than join your synagogue of Satan.

[@ryanchicago6028]

You spelled Arrian wrong. Sorry, I hate religious schisms. I heard this one about the Book of Aughra, but it turns "she [I] was [am] no Guelfling!"

[@arminkleinke-manner9453]

@@byzantineapologetics As I suspect, that you deny that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, which both Jesus (John 14,23) and the Church Fathers (especially St Athanasios) taught, it might be possible that you don't whorship the one true God but one you chose for yourself - as I hope in a non-culpable manner. The theological rejection of the Filioque was btw only post fall of Constantinople a thing in the so called orthodox church, before that the disagreement was only, whether the Pope had the authority to change the wording of the creed but not the filioque itself. A disagreement which sadly developed out of different needs to adress heresy in the East and the West. However if God so favors to crown us both thus, Martyrdom would be a grace indeed =) And sadly (or luckily) might become a reality sooner than later. I am not your enemy. Btw simply ignoring points and arguments makes bad apologetics.

[@byzantineapologetics]

I’m not gonna argue with you because if you wanted to learn something, you would watch the video.