Royal Racist Saga: My Personal Views

[@loveyboo]

The Dutch translator made a statement that she got the manuscript with the names and translated what she was given. In other words Scobie is lying again. She's very upset. She was practically in tears. Her professional reputation has been slimed and she could lose work.

[@flamelily2086]

She shouldn't worry we know that Scabies is a lying little sewer rat. We all believe her.

[@margaritarodriguez9066]

Can't she sue Scobie? Can't the Dutch publishers produce the copy of the transcript that she translated? Show the original English version she got?

[@kieraethan]

MM doesn't care who gets hurt. Very typical narcissist.

[@etmoiaussi899]

No one with half a brain thinks the translator got it wrong. A new low from a low class journalist and his cohorts using lies and slurring to gain attention and money. They must live very small and toxic lives.

[@elgun6125]

I never believed she was to blame.

[@JohnWalker-rt6ue]

Scobie presumably provided the names in his transcript, but subsequently denied it. It’s all a scam to get cheap publicity for his book. Nobody wants to read the crap anyway.

[@hmscatman]

What's the betting that his book will be in the WH Smith half price bin before Xmas?

[@cherylroberts6265]

You certainly are a lawyer because I have no idea what you said with your double speak.

[@margaretstreatfield412]

Sadly, I suspect it's nastier than that.

[@jessroche4677]

@@hmscatman it already is half price!!

[@beccabbea2511]

@@hmscatman Let's face it even if the book is half price toilet paper is cheaper and softer.

[@AlysHK57]

I have done translation work from Dutch into English. No translator ever inserts information into the translated work that isn't there in the original language in which the manuscript is written. I stand with the Dutch translators.

[@anemicvampyre605]

I agree. It wasn’t an accident! It was deliberate. And I don’t believe what scabies wrote in his book, either. I hope Prince Willam or the King sues!

[@SMariaKS]

I doubt they will. They won’t stoop that low but I wish they would.

[@christinac3929]

Suing would give more oxygen to this absurd notion of racism expressed by the wonderment of what a child might look like.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

RUBBISH..

[@sheilacotterill3620]

​@@nicolestjohn6994repetitive still a sugar

[@susanrichards5849]

@@Jooniebug Oh give over.

[@tanyachristensen5330]

When does this behavior constitute harrassment? This has been going on for Years.Publicly no less. It seems criminal to me.

[@hellieb1277]

Completely agree with harassment and I think enough is enough and the RF really need to do something about this now or this is just going to keep going on and on

[@brianperry]

@@hellieb1277 Anything that gets rid of the Windsors has my vote.

[@AnnieH-1]

​@@brianperryAbsolutely. It's a distraction from the Windsors real agenda.Chuck is in Dubai with the other rodents telling us plebs to eat grubs in the cold.

[@SMariaKS]

@@brianperry Airing your views on monarchy is one thing. Condoning disgraceful behaviour is quite another. Not sure why you watch if you are not a fan of our monarchy. There must be other channels and videos for you. More suited to your character.

[@christinelloyd8775]

@@SMariaKSThank you and very well said!!

[@scratchy1704]

There is no racist. It's meghans way of getting at the royals especially the Princess of Wales who she is highly jealous of.

[@fayreid6953]

Exactly, the handlers envy of Catherine is scary

[@potatofries9920]

It's going beyond scary. Megan's obsession with princess Catherine is getting stalker ish, Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace need to stop this once and for all.

[@deloresmatt8643]

People, people, people. Maybe you use another word other than racist. England has a class system that is by its nature is racist. The difference being it is not toward another race so much as people are put into hierarchies. India calls it a caste system. I think the term in England is “your betters”. While the concept is foreign in the U. S. The sentiment is not, thus racism.

[@bugsthompson]

Whilst i agree Megan is a vile human come on we don't even need evidence to know that racism, and all manner of behaviours people do when they are above the law go on within thier circle

[@edronc2007]

I used to be a professional translator before I retired. I can confirm what those two ladies said. It is UNTHINKABLE that a translator would add anything to the copy he or she received.

[@jimmcconnell7328]

I tend to agree with you,this isn’t a slip up. This was done deliberately but the question is by who? Scobie wouldn’t want a law suit against him and he’s said as much.

[@nancymoore1240]

​@@jimmcconnell7328 Scobie may or may not not want a lawsuit, can't tell bec he is such a liar. But the Harkles would be delighted. Attention Publicity. More connection to real royals more victimhood. Yippee!! And WAAGH. That is why they are picking this fight . For relevance.

[@nancymoore1240]

If there is any way to contact the ladies , please tell them that the vast majority of the world is on THEIR side, judging by the comments . Please forward to them our supportive emails. I'm also sure the Dutch publisher didn't insert those names. They had everything to lose, like their reputation, and nothing to gain. The Harkles &:Scabies had everything to gain from it . The publisher who gave the named transcript is responsible, not the Dutch publisher. IMO. The translators are completely innocent. We are all behind you. I know a court translator and it ain't easy. I don't understand many Deep South slangs or New York slangs. 🇺🇸 You translators have to know dialects and slang in 2 ( or more) different languages . It's quite impressive It isn't just being bi- lingual ( impressive enough). There is a lot of studying involved . THANK YOU TRANSLATORS. WE KNOW HOW Precise YOU ARE AND WE Believe YOU❤❤❤❤

[@nancymoore1240]

​@@jimmcconnell7328 And Scobie is such a bastion of truth? Puhleeze. Scobie is an admitted perjurer in the high court.in the UK. He signed an oath, in court, ayyesting to something he knew was not true. That markle has nothing to with "Funding Freedom." Book. Both she and Scabies had to apologize to the court when several emails showed up indicating that she had engineered most of the book. If anyone believes Scobie they are as big a fool as he is.

[@linwei-lee110]

There are multiple reports that Scobie was in CA for months and was seen regularly picking up packages from the desk of the hotel Harry stays at "to play video games". Someone pointed out that Scobie talks about editing and sending the manuscript, but not writing it. I watched Scobie panic when pushed for proof Piers and Camilla phone each other. He referenced an article that didn't say that. Then, Scobie made a weird accusation along the lines of Piers wanting to set the Sussexes on fire and burn them to death, which he's never written or said.

[@rosana847]

The way Harry and Meghan attacks William and Catherine is contemptible.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

RUBBISH

[@lumenesque1]

They've shown themselves to be utterly revolting. They've already been ostracized by general society in two nations because of it. The only common denominator is them. It's undeniable. The consensus is clear.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

@@lumenesque1 RUBBISH

[@ld3418]

Demonstrates they are beyond simple malignant narcissists, but are psychopaths and should be dealt with accordingly with the necessary legal restraining orders for all royals, particularly for the Princess of Wales as the nemesis and target of this evil and jealous harpie.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

@@sheilacotterill3620 LIKE YOU...HA HA

[@drchristinecarr969]

I believe the ‘inadvertent’ slip of names was calculated on Omid’s part. Omid admitted that he was prevented legally to name names in UK so he contrived to slip it into a version to some other country! 🇦🇺

[@annatheocharous2592]

Absolutely agree

[@windycityliz7711]

Racism (against any individual or group) is serious and important. It is time to stop people from using it so casually for political or personal advantage or revenge.

[@EEmB]

That is why I think everyone who experienced racism at any point would be up and arms about this and be furious and Meghan and Scobie for these lies. They are setting back progress, and it's disgusting.

[@trudisinclair8817]

She's doing the same with feminism...💯...backwards by decades...

[@angelikakatarzynaszalas5007]

Exactly

[@olderwiser64]

Amen. Oprah should have INSISTED they provide the details and if they didn’t, she should have called them out for weaponizing such a horrible issue that harms, and in fact kills people, since lodging an allegation of that gravity without any proof or even details is like accusing someone of murder. And saying you didn’t ever want the people name-like Meghan Markle is claiming- but yet bringing it up to smear an entire family with is beyond disgusting. People need to hold them to account-both the Sussexes, their tool Scobie, and any media organizations and personalities that work in furtherance of this smear campaign.

[@annewalden3795]

Windy city what about the racism that MM in particular its guilty of ? Why does no one challenge this vile creature ?

[@Slonge92]

Is it racism to have a casual discussion regarding who a baby is going to look like? No. I think, if the discussion occurred, they should put out a statement accusing Meghan of race-baiting.

[@miyuki3304]

Hear, hear!!

[@snowbird7614]

I’m good with that

[@sallyjohnson3948]

The Only Racists are Harry and Megan!.👍👍👍👍

[@marilynwade9448]

Never happened. Harry is the only one who discussed skin color

[@tlw842]

Meghan never spent time with Doria's black side of the family. If she had, Meghan would have known that such discussions are common place and no one takes offense.

[@LolaClo]

They called the book “Endgame”…of course this wasn’t accidental! This was deliberate and malicious. With a title like that, there is no way this wasn’t intentional. Edit: I purposely used “they” because this wasn’t written by Scobie alone.

[@asseyez-vous6492]

Eindstrijd means Final Battle in Dutch. Makes one wonder…

[@privategirl2]

Let's hope it's her endgame.

[@denisemunoz1719]

I have not and won't read the book, but if no-one gave the information to Omid Scabie, how would he know about it ? This is definitely the work of the duo.

[@desres2281]

Online documents show that Omid Scobie had control of the "non-English" publication of the scabby book. He is 100% responsible as is his controller, Meghan Markle. 😏

[@auldburdlaughin]

Yes, HG Tudor: Scobie leaked the names - very interesting, but I think we all knew that!

[@jennydrake491]

Yes, and now he has given interviews stating (paraphrased): "Everyone on Fleet Street [i.e. all the U.K. journalists] have known for years that it was Charles and Kate." Pure libel, while also committing libel against the Dutch translators for supposedly inserting that information into his book. Meanwhile, the journalist J.J. Anisiobi stated this morning that a Palace source he respects was present for the supposedly "racist" question. It was brought up only ONCE, by a single individual, who was a more distant relative, NOT Charles, Catherine, or anyone from the inner family circle. He was interviewed about it on TalkTV this morning. It is posted on their KZbin channel.

[@magrae47]

Harry denied it was racist but just a conversation that he thought was funny! I don't know where I saw or read this. It's quite normal to discuss colour of dual heritage babies.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

RUBBISH

[@gerrimilner9448]

i have discused possible height, build, eyes, hair and even skin colour with every pregnancy, myself or friends have had. its always wait and see, but the possibilities of having a 6'2" daughter with green eyes curly dark hair, and olive skin, i was close with my first i was a foot too tall and her hair is wavy. most recently a mixed race couple we sugested latte, mum is really white doesent tan, dad is verry dark, baby is more americano and baby couldent be more loved by any of us

[@oralogarro9932]

No it's not

[@SiCrewe]

Try telling that to Megan and Oprah.

[@retha1875]

@oralogarro9932 yes, it is. And it is always a discussion when one parent is a red head

[@desres2281]

Spare a thought for the child known as Archie, whose skin colour was the topic of conversation for 4 years just so his parents could don their cloaks of victimhood! 🤢😡

[@helengunter378]

As if MM ever carried any child. It’s gonna come out soon.

[@trishbrims]

and especially if Archie has no real signs of colour in his skin and looks caucasian.. he will grow up to wonder why his mother and father made such fuss about it … to a point of breaking bonds and family units

[@nicholasmartin787]

We all know how that conversation went, Meghan would have been the first one to bring up the skin colour and someone else flippantly said "how dark is he going to be?"; implying that they didn't think he was going to be that dark, and he isn't, and secondly reaffirming the fact that how dark he was didn't matter to them. But i can guarantee that Meghan was the one who brought it up in the first place, most likely trying to play the race card to gain an advantage in the discussion.

[@fionastevenson4366]

​@@nicholasmartin787how do you know what Archie looks like? We haven't seen any real evidence of his existence

[@deedk]

​@@nicholasmartin787Meghan wasn't even present for the conversation. It was with Harry even before a marriage or pregnancy. She repeated hearsay with her own slant that was contradicted by the person(Harry) in the Oprah interview.

[@edwinakastner8806]

Just a slight but an important one…. Whilst Meghan Markle raised this topic to infer that members of the Royal Family were Racist she wasn’t present when the alleged comments were made. Her information came via Prince Harry and it was before his marriage or any pregnancy. So it’s merely hearsay from a person who has had concerning issues about drug use at times imo.

[@highmyope-ps2by]

Well put. What kind of fiancé or husband would tell his partner something that is potentially hurtful?

[@coolcpa3321]

Thanks for correcting the facts. I furrowed my brows when BlackBelt misstated them. I think Migraine and her pet are deliberately trying to imply problematic discussions using carefully crafted phrases. A discussion "concerning skin tone" conjures dissimilar implications to "concerns about skin tone." Nasty little hairsplitting grifters.

[@madmelwood3778]

And someone who is a race baiter HW

[@sarahl.7277]

At the end of the Colbert interview (you can find it on KZbin) that Harry had for his book, he himself said that at the beginning of their relationship he wondered how their kids would look like. He did not think his ginger genes stood a chance against hers. I do not think he was thinking of her fathers side who had gingers. I can very well see Harry making some mention of it while she was pregnant and she got mad. The only thing I wonder is: at the end of the conversation did she know it was Harry, did he lie and said it was someone else or did he refuse to say?🤔

[@PJ-Sparkles]

Harry said it happened before they were married, and Meghan said it was when she was pregnant. Either she’s lying to make it seem it was about Archie specifically, or she told Harry she was pregnant before they were married (to get a ring on her finger?). Either option is scummy on Meghan’s part.

[@Tomtaylor7337]

Megan's creepy obsession with princess Catherine is very concerning!!!!!

[@somersetgirl125]

I think it’s deliberate. The translator has spoken up and said the names were already in the text she translated. What I can’t understand is how you simply can accuse someone without evidence and you are believed!!

[@Lynda-vq5yl]

it's a shame the poor woman has to defend herself on her doorstep in front of the world media, it was obvious she was very upset --it's her professional reputation he besmirched

[@murielbuxton6993]

Who believes it? No one

[@somersetgirl125]

@@murielbuxton6993The vicious cyber bullies known as the sugars are using it to try and poison the atmosphere. That’s why whenever I come across one I block so that they can’t use my social media to spread their malice.

[@George-W-Jenson]

It all a cheap trick to get attention on the book and get media time

[@Missy802]

Congrats to Piers Morgan for calling the skidmarkles and Scabie out on their BS

[@KarrierBag]

One of the only decent things he has ever done and I knew him when he was 15 so have a bit of history there.....

[@modeangelis7913]

@@KarrierBag not bitter at all right? How old are you know? What was that 30 years?

[@KarrierBag]

@@modeangelis7913 naa not bitter at all, am 56 and like him, have done TV and film and radio and stuff but never wanted the limelite like him. He doesn't have a signed thank you letter from our now king, framed and only 5 ft away though, so I win on that count 🤣🤣 (honest am not telling porkies) BBB Dan might have seen it, I honestly can't remember but it isn't like I am gonna lie about it on a barristers channel .....

[@bod-essebod-esse4142]

She wasn’t the one who had the conversation. According to the interview it was Haz, before they were married. She deliberately made a meal of it.

[@carhasenfratz]

If there even was one. What proof is there?

[@mflax4331]

I am a white male and I was married to a Filipina. Prior to childbirth BOTH families - in my country and family and in the Philippines and her family - were guessing about the skin colour of our kids. That was not racist or even bad intentions, it was just genuine interest and curiosity. In fact my kids turned out to be more like my wife. I didn't care and our families didn't care. Those kids were family and they were loved by every member of both families. The colour of their skin was never any topic in their life - not while they were children and not in their adult life. We were living in my country and 2 of my 3 kids still do. 1 kid moved to the US with her US husband and son. I observed some skin colour related problems in my country, but I was tuned in to such incidents - as it was my task to protect my family. It were minor incidents which did not affect us. You just don't care or deal with stupid! Thus I am certain that for any mixed race couple the families will ask such questions prior to childbirth. It is just curiosity. It is much simpler than even that: EVERY couple and their families will ask "which features will the kid inherit: her's or his'?" Their is NEVER malicious intent involved - not for family members. And everybody who is malicious would have revealed that even before the marriage happened - and they would have been no family anymore after that.

[@emcd5408]

Well put.

[@l.c838]

Absolutely

[@carolwhitelaw7496]

Totally agree, as a mother of 3 mixed race boys, we all discussed how our babies would look. I am happy to report my first son is dark like his father, my 2 is white like me and my 3 is a mixture of both. How lucky am I. All are loved by both families

[@rodzacjisook]

I have interracial kids and both have suffered racial abuse. My eldest gets daily racially abused at secondary school, it something taught to kids. If the so called king and future queen are acting this way then it is racist. They specifically asked how would it look if Archie skin was to dark, how would that appear to the public. They wanted Harry to divorce Meghan as there was an interracial kid having direct line to the throne. Asking about a kids skin colour is racist, full stop. No one in my white family brought it up, none of my friends or colleagues. No one on my wife’s side of the family brought it up and she from the far east. Why should it matter what colour the kids skin colour is. This is why the UK is racists. But uk people are thick to understand. But is something to do Jonny Foreigner then the Brits real colours come out.

[@mflax4331]

@@rodzacjisook You are wrong - read my post again. It is bad that something happened to your kids, but for normal people that is not the rule. BTW I'm not UK nor US. I'm a citizen of a country that was famous for being racist in the last century. My parents were born in 1930 and they never expressed any racist ideas towards my children. As I stated before every family is asking questions about whose features they will inherit more. They simply want to know. Even with same race couples. Just like this: "Will the hairs be blond, red, brown or black?"

[@ukagingrockchick]

My understanding, from comments made by people involved in publishing, is that Scobie's worldwide contract gave him and his agent the role of negotiating all the contracts with the non-English language publishers and sending them an original draft for translation. From this several questions arise. 1. How did an original draft quoting names get sent out if, as Scobie claims, he never produced one with the names in? (Clearly someone is lying here). 2. Was Scobie complicit with his agent in sending out the 'incorrect' version?. 3. Whose idea was it that this might be a good strategy to begin with? (Can't see it happening by accident)

[@patdixon-lj7qs]

Meghan always hated Catherine and King Charles for not giving them more cash

[@lucretialee3691]

If you listen to Scobie he always very carefully says book, not manuscript or draft. A small distinction, but an important one.

[@banedon8087]

I was thoroughly neutral of Harry and Megan up until they I heard about the Oprah Winfrey interview. I had a very dim view of that and even more so of this. They just don't seem to appreciate that most people have seen through there accusations and are disgusted by the continued attacks on the royal family. Really, these two need to go and whine somewhere else as the general public of the UK, US, and Canada no longer have time for them.

[@Whatdoiuseforahandle]

Have you listened to the engagement interview? Red flags from the actress

[@Morgan-qh8dm]

...plus Australia, New Zealand & South Africa : )

[@MsSparklesNGlitter]

The cable actress is cunning but she is nowhere near as clever as she thinks she is. As frustrating as it has been, the RF played the long game and it has been quite effective even if we wish that KC would move more decisively against his treasonous son. The biggest flaw of the cable actress is how she can't keep her mouth shut.

[@auldburdlaughin]

Does make you wonder though, as her efforts to get their attention escalate, what on earth will she do next? Much as I dislike Harry, I do wonder if he is safe with that woman, mentally if not physically.

[@deeh5126]

She can't keep her mouth shut because she lives in a world of delusion- she always thinks things will turn out well for her, even when it fails to do so over and over again. Delusional thinking is common among people wit Cluster B personality disorders (which she may or may not have).

[@nicolestjohn6994]

RUBBISH..

[@carolekratzke9500]

I feel now that it is way past time that the King did something decisive about these two,if not for himself then his loyal subjects and the heir to the throne and his family. This carry on is unbelievably cruel. I'm just amazed that the gruesome spiteful duo still have followers. Why do some people defend their actions?

[@sheilacotterill3620]

​@@nicolestjohn6994repetitive

[@desleighfisher980]

If anyone is going to act, it will be William, and it will be devastating.

[@susieqsevenable]

This will never happen. Ever!!

[@jimmcconnell7328]

William isn’t king yet,this will be up to Charles.

[@davidpnewton]

Probably so. After all he has form for litigation over those topless photos of his wife a decade ago. He won that and his wife as one of the directly defamed parties and he as suffering collateral reputational damage would almost certainly win this as well. Scobie needs to be taken to the cleaners over this.

[@TinaBryning]

I personally felt at the time of the Oprah interview that Meghan’s comments in relation to her child not getting a title or security based on the colour of skin of her unborn child was deliberately misleading to an egregious extent. In actual fact she put the late Queen and her seriously ill husband in the frame. As Queen Elizabeth was still alive and the reigning monarch it would have been she who would have been technically responsible for withholding ( as Meghan implied) a title from the Sussexes child, so Harry and Meghan were maligning The Queen. The withdrawal of the late Queen and Prince Phillips name from the ring didn’t occur for at least 12 hours and it was only put out by a media commentator on an American breakfast TV show, not by Prince Harry and Meghan themselves who were the 2 people who should have taken his grandparents names out of the affray ( given the seriousness of the allegation ) In my personal opinion the fact that 2 people’s names have found their way into a book publication means that someone in the know inserted those names at some point with the intention of outing them and it is my belief that it was done to cause damage to the people named. I cannot think that King Charles wanted to cause damage to himself and Catherine, so the leak will have come from either Meghan Markle or Prince Harry. It is an incredibly serious allegation to accuse a person of making racist comments ( I think that in some circumstances it may actually be a criminal offence and carry a custodial sentence) and it should not be done lightly or frivolously to exact revenge for a different issue…..which is what I personally suspect was done here, given Markle’s loose relationship with truth.

[@nfraser7711]

Actually there was a law made I think in the 1700 or 1800's that the Queen could only give titles to the her children and grandchildren not great grandchildren only Charles when he became King could grant titles to his grandchildren so the Queen had not authority to give Harry's children a title. Charles when he became King did give them titles. So people need to get the truth.

[@mary-kittybonkers2374]

@@nfraser7711Yes, you’re right. I think that most people think that anyone born in direct line to the monarch automatically gets a title; this is not the case. As you said it’s the children and grandchildren who can be entitled, not the great grandchildren. In fact, Anne, Princess Royal, declined royal titles for her children, Peter and Zara, as she thought titles would be more problematic for them than not having them. I think that people’s ignorance of the way titles are bestowed was taken advantage of…majorly.

[@kathyn8780]

well deserved award, names do not get misunderstood, no one is daft enough to believe it ....

[@Sidistic_Atheist]

Piers Morgan is to shrewd an operator, to step on that proverbial land mine. With a career history, of editor in chief of *News of the World* By the age of 28. Plus being editor in chief of *The Daily Mirror.* He certainly knows how far to push the envelope.

[@jasperhorace7147]

And he has access to very good legal advice.

[@carla.p2795]

Scoobie doo's a liar liar pants on fire!

[@jennydrake491]

The journalist J.J. Anisiobi said on TalkTV this morning that there was only ONE conversation, and neither King Charles nor Catherine, Princess of Wales were in any way involved. It was a more distant family member. His source was a Palace official who was present during the conversation in question. Yet Scobie states in an interview that the King and Princess of Wales are known to be the perpetrators by everyone on Fleet Street, while also stating that Dutch translators have somehow inserted those names in the book. That is slander: of the King, the Princess of Wales, and the Dutch translators.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

RUBBISH

[@sheilacotterill3620]

​@@nicolestjohn6994repetitive

[@highmyope-ps2by]

What would Scobie know about Fleet Street?

[@fluffylegs8598]

​@@vch1935they have been saying 'rubbish' to most comments. I just think that it's a broken MM bot. It's probably been working too hard recently.

[@margaretstreatfield412]

There is a lot of focus on who said something. But to my mind, it is at least as important to know exactly what was said, in what context and in what tone.

[@ritaet]

Thank you Daniel for this video. I remember whilst watching the Amber Heard and Jonny Depp trial on the TV, I was always curious about defamation it’s an interesting topic and an important one to educate people. In this modern society, defamation is something a person could quite easily get themselves entangled in. Love your videos ❤

[@blackbeltsecrets]

Thank you!

[@Missy802]

All this over an alleged conversation about a child's skin color who I don't believe Smeg gave birth to it's ridiculous. The way she is obsessed with Catherine is concerning. She needs professional help.

[@jswmjswm6715]

Exactly! Markle is demonic & dangerous😈

[@auldburdlaughin]

She is way beyond professional help, she is a narcissist and cannot be treated.

[@blr4076]

In the Caribbean, hair texture and skin colour are common themes for discussion when expecting new arrivals. My African American niece is often asked by other African Americans why she is light skinned and why her child appears mixed race. Hereditary DNA cannot be ignored.

[@nicolestjohn6994]

KATE THE WITCH WITH THE BIG B..

[@nicolestjohn6994]

@@blr4076 RUBBISH...

[@jojoFranklin]

Thank you. A calm, reasoned and informed opinion. Couldn’t agree more.

[@BuntyMcB]

It’s just been reported on Talk TV this evening that a member of staff at the palace has said that it was neither the King nor the Princess of Wales but somebody else.

[@jennydrake491]

Yes. Naming the King and the Princess of Wales, who were not at all involved, is just a disgusting smear campaign.

[@SRowan-fr1nl]

It doesn’t matter. It is a moot point. Meghan is a trouble maker.

[@user6c7mxkmg]

I can't believe they would be acknowledging a racist, whoever

[@Eirenmist]

Said what?! And what if someone did? Nothing was said that was problematic or racist, but simply a comment in the form of a question that millions of families have had about an expected child during the pregnancy.... Wonder what he or she will look like, will he have his father's hair color, will she have her mother's freckles or fair skin or dark skin...will the baby have the great uncle's nose, or Cousin Charlie's bow legs. Meghan made it into an issue about race because she assumed an abnormal attitude to an altogether normal question. Harry had to follow her lead because she had already announced to Oprah on national television what had purportedly been said to Harry. Even so, when he entered the scene with Oprah he described the situation somewhat differently than Meghan had, and later. tried to deny they had said anything at all, but it "was the press's fault." Both Meghan and Harry have obvious mental health issues and personality disorders. And yes, I am qualified to say that. @@Jooniebug

[@jsemplefelton5348]

​@@Jooniebug- said what?

[@annicecooper8105]

As a mixed race couple our families had so much joy and curiosity in anticipating what our baby would look like and to make that exciting and jouful time fraught is really criminal. It's a perfectly normal conversation in every pregnancy, different races just add more options to the gene mixing pot.

[@stringer-ik1pc]

Diluting is wrong.

[@Dogtagnan]

That word "joy" wonderfully expresses what all families feel when discussing the possibilities of an unborn family member. MM has sucked the joy out of the experience, as she has done in so many situations.

[@annicecooper8105]

@@Dogtagnan I wholly resent being judged and made to feel guilty for wondering what my own child will look like. Because that's how it feels.....as though I need to clarify and explain something joyful and genuinely exciting.

[@jasperhorace7147]

I knew a couple of mixed race with two children. The mother actually said, “I wish we could have had six children just to see what colour they would turn out.” The two children she had were physically very different from each other.

[@annicecooper8105]

@@jasperhorace7147 I think fhat happens in most families - I look nothing like my sister and we are both from white parents. Genetics are an amazing lottery and with a mixed pot of genes there are just more possibilities which is what makes it fun 🙂 For that fun to be sucked out is so spiteful.

[@clochemerle1]

The conversation was one that Harry was privy too, before his marriage to Madame Markle, there was no “Archie” at the time. Meghan received this information from Harry. She sitting alone without Harry, changed the facts somewhat which help solidify what most listeners concluded that she was implying racism in the royal family. What is not mentioned very often in the last days, is that Harry, when he appeared after the disclosure in the Oprah interview, did clarify that detail (conversation before their mariage) and that he would never disclose the name of the person. They issued a statement the next day to save the Queen and Prince Philip from disgrace. That was it until Harry’s interview refuting racism allegations. So if Harry did not disclose the name to a third party other than Meghan …..then who did? In one of his many interviews, Mr. Scobie mentioned that he did not disclose the names in the UK version due to UK laws. What happened in other countries is unknown save the Dutch version. No translator who wishes to keep his job would add such information. It is not done or as you said….would have needed to be done for nefarious purposes which I doubt. If authors dont assure themselves of keeping good records of the versions circulating post editing and if necessary post legal review and identified as final version for print…then this type of scenario can occur.

[@carhasenfratz]

I don’t even believe any conversation took place without a recording. There is no reason to believe anything a known liar says unless you witnessed it. Or there’s a tape, and I’d have the tape anylized for edits if there was one. If someone had a carefully planned takedown that they expected to make millions of dollars from why would anyone believe any of it without proof.

[@carolinaochoa7900]

In my opinion it was always H&M’s intention to put precisely those two names out there for public shaming. There’s no other explanation for this. And the translators should sue for damages.

[@time4tea595]

I agree with Pierce. It was already out so now the RF have a clean slate no chance of blackmail from meghan or harry now

[@karenqueenslander6441]

I don't see the issue with Piers announcing the names. Anyone with access to the internet could quite easily find out anyway. I think the more troubling issue is how the names were published in any version of the book and where those names came from. I would like someone to take the publisher to court. Then we will find out just where the "paper" trail leads. Many of us already have our own suspicions given that the name/names could have only come from one source.

[@stephenluke2347]

It wasn't Megan who had the reported conversation with a royal but Harry.

[@Missyprimm246]

The author was very devious when he wrote the Princess of Wales because he knew that everyone would automatically think of Catherine much to the delight of the Sussex's but that title belonged to Camila at the time of the allegation, everyone knows that it was Charles and Camila who was chatting about who the baby would look like, nothing racist just curious, as would anyone, MM made it racist to suit her own narrative

[@njelekamalata]

Its better it is out so that the Harkles can not blackmail the family in the future. It cant get any worse...or can it?

[@mandymckeown8625]

It could Harry could end up in a coffin ⚰️

[@gratefulmom5781]

Stef the Alter Nerd has a good video on this. She mentions someone on Tumblr who's published several books internationally, who explains that in the process of translation, the English publisher wouldn't have sent a copy to the foreign publishers. It would have been the author's AGENT who sent the final copy to be translated. So Scobie's agent would potentially be on the hook for this ... Scobie also claimed he never mentioned racism in his book - however, Stef shows the actual text of his book where he says, "unconscious racial bias". The lies are piling up.

[@desres2281]

Yes, it's outrageous and the Royal Family made a HUGE mistake not nipping this nonsense in the bud when the despicable duo left in 2020. Missed opportunity to clip their wings. 😏

[@marileearsenault4749]

If they did we truly wouldn’t have seen how horrible they are. They would forever play the victim card. So they are letting them drown in their lies.

[@brendalee6983]

I disagree... you play the long game with narcs...I know from experience...the two are showing their true colors. for the whole world to see

[@jennydrake491]

It has indeed been awful watching them peddle their false narratives, while continuing to swan about demanding royal perks. It does make one wish they had been demoted more resoundingly at the time of their exit. But @marileearsenault4749 and @brendalee6983 are correct about the only effective approach with narcs. Any action taken against them, no matter how justified, just gets added to their victim narrative. Left to their own devices, however, they falsify their own story by contradicting themselves. And they reveal their own viciousness. I do think we will see the Mrs. somewhat neutralized in future by large amounts of extremely negative information coming out about her that has been kept under wraps up to now. Not that she will stop peddling her self-serving lies, but fewer and fewer people will credit them.

[@christineduffy3113]

​@@brendalee6983The long game really this is an institution they are trying to destroy and trashing the British people the long game isn't an option we well most of us the British Public have had it time for the King to earn his privileged position and put his subjects and family first it is a disgrace what they are being allowed to do two pathalogical liars get Parliament to stop burying this bill yes that is what they are trying to do and Titles removed and taken of off the Line of Succession List what is going on of this continues then or will think the Monarchy is not fit for purpose

[@zhmw]

Harry and Meghan were very popular when they first arrived in southern CA. They had multi-million dollars contracts by Netflix and Spotify, and everyone wanted to interview them, including Oprah. So, it would have looked mean-spirited if the RF tried to 'nip it in the bud' and it is better to play the long game.

[@margaretfransen2131]

There were groups of sentences added, likely to the English edition that was handed to the Dutch publisher. (And possibly to Spanish and Italian publishers). At any rate, before translation.

[@Tugela60]

The translation would have been done with the original manuscript, not the english version of the book, which would have been edited prior to publication.

[@klaiyer4819]

I hope the translator sues Covid Scabbies for slander after accusing her of being responsible for what is obviously Covid Scabbies purposeful “mistake” Poor woman being dragged into something like this, bless her, sending her lots of love&light💜x

[@SRowan-fr1nl]

I agree with you. 100%. . The concerns would not be racist. This is why I say so, in addition to all that’s said here. There are many high-profiled people in America who are bi-racial. They were carefully raised because their “parents understood the challenges they would face and prepared them, instilling self-awareness, character, and strength to navigate their way graciously through this world. In fact, all children should be raised with those goals and other noble goals. Meghan was taught that the world was her oyster and that she could have whatever she wanted with one caveat- don’t give your milk away for free. She is not a role model in anyway for young women, particularly black women. She claims to be a strong , feminist, yet she married rich, influential men to help her achieve her goal and when things don’t work out she threatens suicide or falls down on the floor and cries. It’s ridiculous. Everything that the RF is accused of saying is acceptable and normal. I don’t care who it was. They all could have said it. It’s OK. It’s normal. This is the race card that is being played and it needs to stop. It’s goal is to silence opposition and inhibit free speech.

[@Eirenmist]

Agree! As you point out, what if someone did say something speculative about any children they might have? Nothing was said that was problematic or racist, but simply a comment in the form of a question that millions of families have had about an expected child during the pregnancy.... Wonder what he or she will look like, will he have his father's hair color, will she have her mother's freckles or fair skin or dark skin...will the baby have the great uncle's nose, or Cousin Charlie's bow legs. Meghan made it into an issue about race because she assumed an abnormal attitude to an altogether normal question. Harry had to follow her lead because she had already announced to Oprah on national television what had purportedly been said to Harry. Even so, when he entered the scene with Oprah, he described the situation somewhat differently than Meghan had, and later. tried to deny they had said anything at all, but it "was the press's fault." Both Meghan and Harry have obvious mental health issues and personality disorders. And yes, I am qualified to make that observation.

[@EEmB]

THIS!!! Well said!

[@userm-m4k]

​​​@@Eirenmistit was Megain's obvious intention to destroy the monarchy and to give a reason for leaving the RF because they are "racist". That' is what it is about. She could have raised the issue privately with the person concerned within the family if the remark upset her. I'm sure it was not intentional. But she chose to tell the world on this issue in order to ruin the RF and Harry had to follow suit. That was cruel. No compassion or kindness that she intends to preach to us. Look what she has done to her father. Why would Megain tell scobie or her team the names of the people making that so called racist remark. She said she wouldn't divulge the names as it would be damaging to them. Well she's done it. I would not be surprised if she is involved with Scobie in this plot to reveal the names in a Dutch edition out of spite even indirectly. Scobie admitted that he got information from the Sussex team.

[@wendywhitter2768]

Surely if the allegations were true they would not be afraid of any repercussions, therefore there would be no reason to leave the names out because they have the receipts to back this up as the actual truth. Or this is all done with malice covered up with smoke and mirrors.

[@kappytime]

What was Mr. Scobie's "end game?" Sending a manuscript to The Netherlands with the "names" and blaming the translator and the Dutch publisher was ALWAYS going to result in the easily foreseeable situation we have here. So why does it seem as if Scobie and the Harkles are scrambling to come up with a response to disclaim responsibility? Is it possible manuscript manuscript version 3.0 contained the "names," version 4.0 did not, and the primary/English language publisher approved, printed and released the "nameless" version 4.0. However, it's my understanding Scobie retained publishing rights to the non-English language versions which he then sold separately. Perhaps (he or his representative) accidentally/incompetently provided version 3.0 to those customers. This is the only explanation that makes sense to me. Defaming the translator or the Dutch publisher was NEVER going to work - the accusation can be so EASILY disproved by producing the source manuscript.

[@SMariaKS]

My Dad was multi lingual and he used to get books about World War 2. He lived through it and was a displaced person from Eastern Europe so he had a keen interest in reading about it. Apart from the fact there was propaganda and mistruths in all these books, he told me that if the book was from Britain there were a lot of pages changed. He got a book in Australia when we lived there and got the same book to reread here in England. He was surprised to see parts missing. This just proves it to me though I took what my Dad said as fact. It seems that in Britain we have censorship. So much for our freedom and rights. I know I have wavered from topic but Scobie has used the situation to get attention to his book. He is succeeding though showing himself to be absolutely a mouthpiece for his handlers.

[@neiltomkins4713]

No, that’s really interesting. I have always suspected this to be he case. Unfortunately now it’s gone completely off the charts as mainstream media consistently edit out things they don’t want us to know or it doesn’t fit their agenda.

[@elisabethvismans]

I don’t think it was done for attention of the book. MM wanted the names out there without being the one mentioning them. They are obviously not as clever as they think they are.

[@user-vl2yf7jj3l]

I hope the odious scabies is not expecting help from his psymasters

[@alayneperrott9693]

Fear of libel suits under stricter UK laws is much more likely than censorship.

[@flamelily2086]

The allegations were being repeated on social media and they were already being named so Piers Morgan was in the right. He used his platform to debunk the allegations.

[@jimmcconnell7328]

Why would Piers Morgan know anything about what goes on in the royal family. He’s not exactly a nice person himself.

[@jsemplefelton5348]

​@@Jooniebug- not we. Just idiots like yourself.

[@orthodoxblue7252]

Why is everyone accused of being racist all the time? We need to all say what we feel without repercussions.

[@Trebor74]

Racism makes money. It silences critics,etc etc

[@kathrynwhitby9799]

because it's the ultimate reasoned debate-killer.

[@softcolly8753]

there is currency in victimhood

[@roslynaubrey7766]

And yours is the most intelligent of all!

[@deloresmatt8643]

Maybe they are racist. If you say things that have racial undercurrents it’s racial and if the things are malicious then they’re probably racist. At the very least they’ve made racist comments. When you’re accused of being racist, examine yourself stop jumping to defend yourself before you think it through.

[@susanlawrence9065]

Not just in the Dutch version but also in the Italian and Spanish. So how does their cheerleader answer that one?

[@fayhart6355]

Just heard on talk T. V they are saying that it’s one “allegedly” NOT two. How many times can this stupid story change. Scabby needs to be sent to the tower with his handlers 🙏

[@highmyope-ps2by]

What have you got against the poor ravens? They remained at the Tower through two world wars, but having that pair there might well make them fly away.

[@SRowan-fr1nl]

Yes, what Jeremy Clarkson suggested was mild compared to what you’re suggesting.😉

[@jsemplefelton5348]

​@@highmyope-ps2by- their wings are clipped.

[@brendamuirhead483]

Someone needs to sue Omid. That’ll bring it all out in the open. He’ll be forced to name his sources. The translator might have a defamation case and a trashing of her professional reputation and possible loss of work…after all he is strongly suggesting she inserted the offending paragraph.

[@MegaMuussi]

Meghan's father warned RF that Meghan will break up the family. HOW did he know that?

[@d.annejohnson5631]

The dutch version had one or more paragraphs that were missing from the British and American versions. Obviously at some point there was draft of the book that had this information in it, and perhaps Scobie was told that this information might not pass British libel laws or something similar. Whoever sent this draft to the Dutch translators will be on the hook...either Scobie, his agent, or UK publisher.....

[@manjudhaliwal6383]

Dutch translator has already admitted the names were in the original script 😮😮 It’s Scooby doo to be blamed & his accomplice Italian version contains names as well 😮😮 Again Scooby doo & accomplices to be blamed = legal action 😮😮

[@bloodgorged]

There's no way Omid would have worked so hard to do this unless he had a way out. Let's just wait and see how he annoys us all with his Teflon escape.

[@kimberleygirl7533]

My family has the Ginger. We have endless discussions about the freckles and shades of carrot! When one of us married a girl of Greek descent and we got two gorgeous babies with black hair and olive skin we rejoiced! 😊

[@jdog6813]

Strip them both of their titles.

[@carlosenriquez2092]

I just can't help but believe that this was collusion between Harper Collins and Omid Scobie. How else is it possible that such a blatantly vulgar blunder happens, at a publishing house of this caliber.

[@studor6515]

why has everybody latched onto Megan's version of events when harry said not minutes later it was a casual conversation discussed in the early stages of their relationship.

[@alantheinquirer7658]

I think the author wanted to sell his book as a form of 'kiss and tell'. When he says "It was a publishing error" what he really means is he put the names in the book, but was told he shouldn't. By that time, they'd printed a few hundred Dutch editions. So now he's back-peddling furiously, knowing he may've gone too far in his attempt to sell his books.

[@christinac3929]

My name translates the same in Japanese, Dutch, German, Korean etc

[@Dugiesrevenge]

This shows how a bad girl can weave a web around a young and gullible boy and ultimately destroy his life and family…

[@twistedsister2568]

Gullible yes but not young. The bloke is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

[@christineduffy3113]

A young and gullible boy he was a man in his thirties not a teenager he was warned but like his arrogant Uncle another Spare he never took advice a disgrace what he and his wife are getting away with his Father is weak and his subjects Hey remember us are sick of a drug addled moron and his slapper wife making a fool out of the Monarchy and the British people either step up or stand down and let a real man do your dirty work for you that would be William Prince of Wales

[@Dugiesrevenge]

@@twistedsister2568 that’s inbreeding for you… To quote Black Adder “Come on, somewhere outside Saffron Walden, there's an uncle who's seven feet tall with no chin and an Adam's apple that looks like he's trying to swallow a ballcock!

[@zhmw]

@@twistedsister2568 In other words, his brain has been fried by his drug addiction. And he wasn't the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree anyways.

[@annettejoneslightpainter]

Young? He is a middle age man !

[@ridinreiners]

Someone from the Netherlands would have leaked the names by now if Piers had not done it. think that Piers Morgan has intentionally put Obed Scobie, and Harry and Meghan up against the wall. He called their bluff. Harry and Meghan now need to denounce this once and for all, or we will all know they gave the names to Scobie. It’s crunch time. I feel bad for the King and Princess of Wales to have to endure this.

[@nightowl5395]

Of course it's not just an accident; they are despicable, they make me feel sick 🤮 ...the 'window dummy' Scobie too

[@kate2create738]

What are the chances a lawsuit could be held by the Dutch court? Either by the British royal family or the publishers that Omid had accused of leaking the names.

[@user-vl2yf7jj3l]

I hope so …. The Dutch Royal Family will be displeased that they have been brought into the equation because of the translator and publisher ….. especially as Prince Harry and Ragland were not accorded accommodation by the Dutch Royal Family which this couple took as a slight against them ….

[@zhmw]

I am more concerned about how Archie and Lili are going to cope as they grow older, with their British Royal titles in a nation with NO Royalty and NO ties to the UK. And how are they going to view their parents, when they are old enough to do their own internet research that they have been isolated and cut off from all extended family?

[@gwendolineknox784]

Let's hope H&M are still around to catch the flack from their 'supposed children'. I for one wish the children were child actors hired or borrowed. At least they will be having a normal life and know nothing of these deranged people.

[@elgun6125]

Piers may have spoken about it, but it was right across KZbin before he said anything.

[@irenemayumi5793]

Symptoms of narcissist person: Having an exaggerated and unfounded sense of your own importance and talents ( grandiosity) ,;Preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited achievement, influencie, power,intelligence,beauty or perfect love. Have the conviction that they are special and unique

[@gwendolineknox784]

A perfect description. Perhaps that the dictionary definition she is basing herself on?

[@Canuck13]

The Dutch translator will certainly have a copy of the original manuscript to defend herself. We will all see it. It’s a matter of time.

[@In.Darkness]

Merry Christmas! Everyone 🔥

[@cayboy420]

I’m a veteran at the translation industry on the technical side of things. This could be an issue of version control. It could be that an older version prior to the final edit did contain the names, and those were inherited forward into the final version by an error that did not catch the update that removed the names. Translators frequently use a piece of software called a translation memory system. It’s a fancy Word processor and builds up of database of your translations as you translate. Every sentence goes into the database and an AI is used so that if the same sentence appears later on, it is offered to you so you don’t have to translate it twice. Also this is useful between versions of the same type of document so if 65% of the document is the same as the previous version, the software will offer you that 65%, even partial sentences, it uses fuzzy logic AI for a percentage similarity to the original text. If the sentence is 100% the same the translation can just be added to the new version. If it is a partial match, then manual review and retranslation is required. It may be that the previous version contain the names and was leveraged into the final version, but not noticed. Seems unlikely considering the gravity of the issue though!

[@emcd5408]

I believe, and may have misheard, that the author said he didn't include it in any version.

[@gwendolineknox784]

@cayboy Despite your wording in the last sentence , are we all saying now it was AI. That's handy .How did it pick those two names, they don't normally go together. It is Charles & Camilla and William and 'Kate'

[@kerinsian8844]

I totally agree about the "concern" expressed IF it happened. Because concern FOR is very different than concern ABOUT. The first is protective, the second could be anything from a mild discomfort to full blown distaste. I think IF there was any concern it was the former, concern FOR any future children, and the problems that they might face from bigots being such public figures.

[@LindaCharles-sg6mz]

When does this become harassment? It seems to me that it is becoming harassing behaviour. How can the RF stop this without going to law. There seems to be a constant barrage of attacks I am exhausted at the constant attacks how the RF feel I cannot imagine.

[@savitriperera6779]

Prince Harry’s and Meghan’s jealousy towards Prince William and Princess Catherine seems to have no bounds. Omid Scobie’s book certainly has Harry’s and Meghan’s fingers are all over the book.

[@GillNRTT]

Could the translate sue, OS is on record as saying it’s a translation issue. The publishers have updated to say this is an error. Going back to OS, he said that there were no names in any copy of the book he wrote. So, going forward do you think there is a legal case against the translated, the editor or against OS as he has stated he has never named names, ever.

[@jennydrake491]

If the translator and publisher suffer economically and emotionally from his lies, then yes. Scobie's statements in interviews that he did not send the publisher the names and that the translators made mistakes are definitely libelous.

[@droneandpix]

Meghan made her comments to a global audience based on hearsay and her spin of what Harry told her as she wasn’t even there! Given Harry didn’t even know he was unhappy and trapped until Meghan told him so, as disclosed on Oprah, we know that she had a way of manipulating him and making him feels and think things he never saw before!! Let’s face it, before Markle, we as a nation only ever knew a happy Harry who got on well with his brother and sister in-law and we loved the interaction between them at events. This is all Meghan’s spin from grilling Harry about every little thing that was talked about when she wasn’t there as narcissists always do to find out what was said about them!

[@Dogtagnan]

She said there was "concern" about the skin colour. But it wasn't "concern " it was almost certainly the same warm curiosity that most families speculate about an unborn child. The use of "concern" was scheming, cynical manipulation of language.

[@droneandpix]

@@Dogtagnan she has a chip on her shoulder about her mixed race and perceived it as a slur. Until of course it suited her new and improved narrative and revealed she was 40 odd percent Nigerian! Of course families speculate, Harry himself has talked about being ginger, like it’s a bad thing! Nobody bats an eyelid at that! How did a ginger like me bag someone like this he said!

[@debramilam.3123]

Piers said the names were named in Omids book. It certainly wasn’t Piers that named them and he thought it was bogus! Piers asks the hard questions in an interview and certainly voices what he believes is the truth. I admire him for that.

[@onelife7247]

They’re not racist.

[@Minbari209]

Some people need to look up the definition of racist. Wondering what colour a baby’s skin would be is no more than normal curiosity. Human beings are full of it .

[@sarahsimpson8770]

Remember PH and MM accepted an award for fighting racism in the RF.

[@misty7447]

Even if Piers Morgan did not reveal the names, people in the UK and other countries can always get them from relatives and friends in the Netherlands. We are not living in the middle ages! Just bring out your mobile phone and there you have the news.

[@ALT-vz3jn]

Harry must be absolutely furious at his wife and Scooby for having pulled this stunt. If I were him I would be. They’re actively working to finish alienating him from his own family.

[@carolrawsthorne7655]

Hi Dan. I watched a video where they we’re going through the book and they showed the acknowledgments at the back of the book. One he singled out was the guy who translated the book from English into Dutch. I don’t know if it was my imagination but he made a point of saying how hard it must have been. I took it to be some kind of in-house joke. Not sure.

[@VJShordee]

I think Piers saying the names finally gets this over with. Pier has been lied about in Omid’s book. Piers always believed Markle had lied, which so many of us believe also. The woman went on Oprah , set off a firestorm about racism in the royal family about Archie’s skin colour. We are still talking about it yrs later. I feel Oprah owes ppl an apology because of her reaction. She inflamed the situation. These names were somehow left in, in the Dutch version. By mistake, I highly doubt it. The whole world is talking about the book now. Probably a publicity stunt.

[@leandabee]

It just wasn't Piers who mentioned the names, every youtuber put it out there too, because the Dutch seen it first. So if other people named names, why would Piers be in trouble. I agree, Piers will fine 😊👍

[@ElizabethEllenCarter]

I'm a published author (20 titles and counting) and every suspicion you have is correct. Mysterious additional content *does not* magically appear in a manuscript at translation stage. In my opinion, I believe the Dutch publishers received an earlier proof that had the names and the English language edition had the passage excised at the very last minute which was failed to be transmitted to the Dutch publishers. I would check other foreign language editions for a similar error.

[@gwendolineknox784]

If your explanation is correct, and it does sound plausible, then Scabies DID put the names in in the first place. Bingo

[@krownjoolz]

Just look at the amount of free press this book has now had over this debacle. It feels like a cynical attempt to gain sales.

[@SydMountaineer]

*BBB,* A theory: Meghan & Scobie might’ve assumed the King & the Dutch publisher would cover it up to protect themselves & avoid chaos. (Even an accusation of a publisher messing up can ruin their business, AND, the publisher DID take a step to keep the reason quiet at first, they released a statement with no reason given for the books being pulled, until Piers Morgan broke the news). And *maybe, this was a set up,* where, IF the King & publisher kept it quiet to avoid the chaos, Scobie & Meghan would’ve either outed them (or maybe just the King) to make the King look guilty, or to blackmail him with the info that he didn’t say anything & kept it quiet. *Maybe that’s why Piers Morgan made it public?*

[@jgreen5820]

The royal rogue shared an excerpt from an interview Omid Scobie gave on you tube gave about the racism assertions and he talked about unconscious bias and racism and Scobie says very clearly that he does not view it as unconscious bias but it should be named what it is, which is racism. So he is lying in the latest interview that he never said it was racism - he did.

[@R1chardH]

Chris Rock nailed how common it is to guess the baby colour, u check behined the ears.

[@suestewart-g4f]

Piers said he took legal advice before talking about it.

[@sunandevise9934]

Always and happy to hear from your comments

[@marileearsenault4749]

Would the royal family have a case

[@deedeedoes818]

Neil Shaun reporter in the UK has stated on KZbin today that when Harry was staying in hotel rooms this year he was witnessed receiving and sending packages of documents between himself and Omid Scobie when he was visiting LA allegedly

[@mauvibauer1828]

You cannot simply insert your own material when translating. Besides, names don’t need translation, they are what they are.

[@N330AA]

The amount of furore that's been generated over one comment that nobody knows what it was, who said it or in what context boggles the mind.