RTX 4080 SUPER gets CRUSHED in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle!

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle running on the Nvidia RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB graphics card at 4K and 1440p resolutions using ray tracing, ultra graphics settings with DLSS and frame generation on and off. In this video, Benchmark Boy will display benchmark performance stats including fps, framerate, core clocks, power consumption, temperatures and much more! These benchmarks will help you make your next pc hardware buying decisions.
🖥️ PC Spec:
GPU: RTX 4080 SUPER - www.overclocke...
CPU: i9 14900K - www.amazon.co....
CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series iCUE H150i Elite - www.corsair.co...
RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Series 64GB DDR5 6000 - www.gskill.com...
PSU: Gigabyte 1000W ATX 3.0 Power Supply - www.amazon.co....
Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR5 ATX Motherboard - www.msi.com/Mo...
WD Black SN850X 2TB SSD M.2 - www.amazon.co....
PC Case: Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Mid Tower Case - Black - lian-li.com/pr...
LG 27" 27GN950-B 4K 144hz Monitor - bit.ly/3nqoFj0
Alienware 25" AW2521HFA 1080p 240hz Monitor - dell.to/3A0oyje
Dell UltraSharp 32 8K Monitor UP3218K
Recorded with nvidia shadowplay - www.nvidia.com...
Overlay: MSI Afterburner, Rivatuner, HWiNFO - www.msi.com/La...
You can find me on:
Twitter - / thebenchmarkboy
Facebook - / thebenchmarkboy
Twitch - / benchmarkboy
⭐ Become a member and help support the channel! - / @benchmarkboy
💵 Donate to support the channel - streamelements...
📝 Discord - / discord
Timestamps:
00:00 - 4K Ultra, DLSS:Off, FG:Off, RTX:On
00:38 - 4K Texture Pool:Very Ultra, DLSS:Off, FG:Off, RTX:On
01:17 - 4K Ultra, DLSS:Qual, FG:On, RTX:On
01:43 - 4K Ultra, DLSS:Qual, FG:Off, RTX:On
02:10 - 1440p Ultra, DLSS:Off, FG:Off, RTX:On
02:45 - 1440p Ultra, DLSS:Qual, FG:On, RTX:On
03:12 - 1440p Ultra, DLSS:Qual, FG:Off, RTX:On
#rtx4080super #4080super

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Drop a like on the video for the KZbin algorithm and let me know in the comments what you think of the performance 👍🏻

[@Red-ss5lv]

the i9 14900K bottlenecks with that GPU at 4K. You should try it on the Ryzen 7 5800x3d instead

[@prem3548]

Remember, this game already bottlenecked by 16 GB of VRAM at 4K so, don't let Nvidia convince you a 16 GB 5080 is ok

[@Annihilation99]

Idiots will still buy it. 5080 will be obsolete the moment it releases im happy to stay on my 7900xtx for another 2 years for now.

[@davidkennethnoronha1622]

5080 has 24gb Vram tho.

[@Vierdix]

​@@davidkennethnoronha1622 5080 has 16 GB VRAM. 4090 has 24 GB VRAM. 5090 has 32 GB VRAM

[@Fibeu]

@@davidkennethnoronha1622it has 16gb of GDDR7. It should have 24gb though, but it doesn’t.

[@cister._]

Nope, 16​@@davidkennethnoronha1622

[@d4nith3]

Test this on RTX 3090, 4090, RX 7900XTX, gpu with 24GB vram to see whats happening

[@Filipp9411]

Hi i have 4080 Super Aorus Master and with all settings MAXED a have 3fps :) 4K. My friend have 4090 Aero and with same settings and 4k he had around 50-60 fps and Vram utilization around 18GB. Have a nice day :)

[@TFXZG]

On 7900 XTX Patch Tracing not available.

[@denizsahin4176]

@@Filipp9411so the vram is the bottleneck

[@hombre-lusitano3414]

@@denizsahin4176 I´ve noticed one peak of 11300 MB at LibreOffice System-Monitor-App. But the regular usage is much lower. Shitty Greedy Nvidia Devils continued to spend to less VRAM. Why must this be so. Graduelly should be like AMD does. On her RX 7900 XT with 20 GB VRAM and 24 GB on the XTX. RTX 4070 Ti Super with 16 and 4080 S with 20 GB of VRAM. RTX 4090 has 24. So all high End cards would be fit well. but greedy boys still continued at Blackwell. Absolutely doing the same Shit. The new RX 8800 XT could be the Game Changer. When rumors are true. With her strongly improved RayTracing performance. She should be at the same level as the RTX 4080 S. with equal Rasterization too.

[@RobyMicrobi]

Absolutely VRAM bottleneck. Unfortunately, the 4080 was already outdated since launch because of not enough VRAM for futureproofing. 24 GB or more should be a standard for any next gen GPU claiming to be built for 4k gaming.

[@JamisonMichaelTV]

This will be the game to test out the 5080 and 5090

[@jakacresnar5855]

the 5080 won't do any better if it still comes with 16 GB of VRAM, which is obviously the problem here

[@JamisonMichaelTV]

​@jakacresnar5855 5080 will do at least do slightly better. Obviously won't be as good as the 5090, but will do better than 4080 super

[@jakacresnar5855]

@@JamisonMichaelTV it might achieve higher average framerates, but if it still.has 16 GB, once the buffer fills up and it has to go to system memory, it starts to stutter and hitch, bringing the numbers way down.

[@Mr.Kumar1]

Still fake frames and interpolated nothing native

[@Goldpanda94]

Im playing with 4080 Super. Im getting around 65 fps with 4K and Ultra settings and Path Tracing set to just RT Indirect Ilumination and Sun Shadows and Reflections set to off. Gives the nice lighting look of the path tracing without killing frames on 4K. With Sun Shadows turned on, i get like 8 fps.

[@itstusk9495]

turn path tracing off ! your frames will come back! you're welcome :)

[@DAVICII]

don't use dlss quality in 4k. Auto (performance) is enough. Texture pool size needs to be high or ultra depending on your settings. I play with full raytracing and 100--110 fps with a 4080. Shadows medium. HDR doesn't work with frame gen. Recording costs a lot of fps and Vram too so you need to lower even further without a capture card.

[@teptaylor]

Auto just picks a preset

[@DAVICII]

​​​it picks the preset suited for each resolution automatically. In 4k it's performance in 2k it's balanced and in 1080p it's quality. I try to just give you the best settings in case you play on different resolutions ​@@teptaylor

[@getawaydriver101]

I turn frame generation off because it locks you at what your monitor is doing search your monitors at 1:44 you're going to get locked at 1:44 because of frame generation but not all game engines do it only certain game engines do it mainly the AAA titles do it but not all of them do I have a few games where I have frame generation on and I'm still hitting to to 240 frames no man's Sky won't let you do that with frame generation they lock you at what your monitor does if you turn on frame generation it turns on your vsync

[@sh_chef92]

​@@getawaydriver101 You actually want to hit monitor lock or fps cap with framegen, because that way it works how it should with clean frametimes and smoothnes. ABSOLUTELY BEST WAY to setup your PC is: NvidiaControlPanel: GSYNC ON,LOWLATENCYMODE ULTRA, VSYNC ON. These 3 things together are supposed to work together and it will result in lowest latency and smoothest frames. If game has reflex, turn that ON, it will replace the lowlatencymode. The game should automatically lock your fps a few frames before your refreshrate, if it does exactly that, its working, if not, game didnt took vsync from controlpanel and you need to turn on vsync in game. If you cant hit fps for automatic lock, you can lock your frames manually few frames behind your average fps. Trust me this is best way with FG and also without FG for best smooth lowlatency game experience.

[@DAVICII]

​​​I did lock my fps inside the nvidia panel because I normally play with nvidia Vsync on and then lock my fps with riva statistics tuner to 115 fps ​@@getawaydriver101.For the video I did not lock the fps at 115 but I forgot to switch off Vsync inside the nvidia panel. I know exactly how to set up my games where I want them to be. I just wanted to show that with little tweaks the 4080 can handle Pathtracing in 4k with good fps. It could have done maybe 5 fps more at 1:44 but honestly I prefer to stay below because the fps drops in other parts of the game and my monitor has 120hz but the sweetspot with Gsync Vsync is 115.

[@modrribaz1691]

Our brain's visual centers contain 450 million neurons, processing 2.5 quadrillion impulses within a maximum of 150ms delay, which is similar to a GPU with 450 million cores and combined Gpixel and GTexel rates of 1.67 quintillion per second, or to 960000 RTX 4090 GPUs running in parallel. However, according to ChatGPT, a true 1:1 match would require around twice as many for reality-bending graphics, a seemingly impossible tier of performance more theoretically achievable with photonic and quantum computing, expected to become available to consumers by 2040-2050.

[@BestGameLoadouts]

yk... 2040 is almost about just 15 years away. That's just 2 console generations away at this point. Sounds exciting and about right for ultra realistic, "real-life" graphics

[@Godly_Nose]

All powered by an average of 100 watts gods craftsmanship is unmatched.

[@RJTHEGAME]

The 4080 super can run it fine at 4k, you just have to change the texture pool size to high actually Vram is the only issue with it, Supreme - Ultra size pool doesn't help with vram issues

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Going to ultra pool size did seem to help with the vram issue though. Thats the only setting i dropped down and it completely fixed my issue

[@RJTHEGAME]

@@BenchmarkBoy Yeah I wasn't sure about Ultra because I found later on in the game that if I applied FG it would go over the vram limit again because for some reason FG adds almost 2GB of vram as well lol So I'm not using FG But you don't need that on DLSS performance or Balanced really as I found I was getting over 60fps on the 4080 Also even on High texture size pool once I put FG on it went over the limit, so maybe Ultra can work also but must be right on the brink without FG Digital Foundry said I think you're not missing out on much as long as you don't go below to medium from high anyway i'm sure they said that, it's only distance objects but I didn't really notice much difference on high from Ultra Probably at 1440p ultra size pool is fine but at 4K I think high is more safe from what i've seen

[@blackened1231]

4K - Texture pool high, RT medium, DLSS Performance. That combo is working to me with 4080 to get stable 60 fps. If I turn on FG with that settings everything falls apart because I'm on the limit with VRAM. Actually I play 4K DLSS to quality without any raytracing and with HDR on - for me visually HDR has more impact then RT, PT. And with that settings I have locked to 90 fps without frame drops.

[@RJTHEGAME]

@blackened1231 👍 Yeah I think it's ridiculous how we're having to do this on a 4080😂 The game is very poorly optimized with FULL RT enabled. No wonder they delayed it but released RT late. The vram usage is crazy and even when it wasn't using over 15GB I still got a crash

[@RJTHEGAME]

@blackened1231 it's also crazy how even enabling FG breaks the game. Surely that's gotta be fixed. FG is also broken if HDR is on I really duno how 12GB GPUs are managing with it & yes I always use HDR and in this game it makes the colours better

[@bonobo276]

This game’s Ray Tracing setting is actually used to enable “Full Ray Tracing” (or Path Tracing). If you turn it off, the game will still use its RTGI, meaning the base game is already having Ray Tracing. Flipping that setting and you will get a perfect (theoretically) Ray Tracing. Indiana Jones is pretty well optimized, it comes from the same studio that made Wolfenstein. And instead of ranting why RTX 4080 can’t do 4K 60 FPS with max settings, you should research about the game and Ray Tracing in general. We’ve come a long way and rendering Ray Tracing in real time, it’s a technical marvelous but we’re still in early stage.

[@카를로타69]

With texture full size set to high, FULL RT settings, and FG and DLSS performance enabled, I can get over 70fps in the intro scene. VRAM is holding me back. Can't help it.

[@sh_chef92]

Unoptimized textures brother. This game is a joke. Nvidia is coming with massive upgrades to FG,DLSS,DLAA,RR that will massively boost quality, boost performance and lower vram usage, also in future we will get neural rendering for textures and that will massively reduce vram usage.

[@카를로타69]

@sh_chef92 I hope so please...

[@gaminggazonk]

Feels like this is the Crysis of modern gaming. “BUT will it run Crysis?”

[@essamahmod]

It's not running well on my rtx4090

[@supremeboxers50]

developers should refrain from letting people experience anything under 30fps (60fps if you wanna get serious)

[@Sensu0]

Indiana Jones is the new Crysis when it comes to benchmarking hardware. We'll be asking each other "can it run Indiana Jones?".

[@justinsmith7032]

A 4080 Super is not a 4k card for high quality AAA titles. People get fooled by DLSS and FSR because they don't understand the tech.

[@Fishplants]

It worked fine with my 4080 super before i installed the nvidia new driver..

[@ades2707]

Can we stop acting like everyone has a high end pc hardwares? If noone complaining about this then every dev gonna get too lazy at optimization. Red dead 2 literally the example, its one of the 100gb high graphics rich content game that i found no problems with mid end hardware

[@oniichanXD-v2g]

rdr 2 with indiana jones locations would have been epic

[@patrykgrzyb2776]

I remember when I got my 4080, and the first game I tried was Horizon Forbidden West. I connected my PC to my LG C2 4K HDR TV to see the huge difference compared to the PS4/PS5. I sat down comfortably in front of the TV, expecting a great experience, but I was only getting 15 fps regardless of the settings. After two weeks, the game received a patch, and it turned out the issue was with the PS5 controller connected to the PC, not my GPU. This just shows how settings and other factors can slow down a PC. The only question I have for you is why the GPU is only reaching 50 degrees-it seems like it isn't using its full potential.

[@nben1843]

it's VRAM limited.

[@jeffnduran]

Dude my Xbox wireless controller kills frames for STALKER 2 and Indiana Jones when it's connected wireless. When I plug it in with a cable I get 30FPS more on average. Weird.

[@Waffles435]

4000 series cards have crazy cooling so its gonna be not as hot.

[@TheGrizzlyRick]

I've never seen my 4080 super go above 55c on any game, just insane cooling lol

[@yosifvidelov]

yeah 16GB VRAM with 4K path tracing is not possible sorry... FG hits the VRAM as well at the same time.

[@TheOne214]

Dont use FG than its a useless feature in my opinion AI Frames more like Fake Frames.

[@sh_chef92]

Its easily possible if you are not using "SUPREME TEXTURES" which are basically unoptimized uncompressed overkill resolution textures. Also massive upgrades to DLSS,DLAA,RR and FG are coming soon with much better quality, performance and less vram usage. Also in few month games will be implementing neural rendering for textures, materials and lighting which will boost performance again and massively reduce vram usage. 16GB will be enough for some time dont worry.

[@sh_chef92]

​@@TheOne214 Its not useless, works excellent in singleplayer games (specially with pathtracing (DLSS and RR turned on too) ) with atleast 60fps+ from which its doubled. I am using it with GSYNC, LOWLATENCY MODE ULTRA (or REFLEX if its in game), VSYNC ON ---> (these 3 settings works together to get lowest latency, best smoothness and nice framepacing locking the game automatically to few fps before refreshrate.) on my 1440p 165hz monitor resulting in automatic lock to 158fps (79real fps, 79 generated) and its amazing how smooth and clean frametimes are, also latency is very decent on these frames already for singleplayer games, aiming is precise and smooth, its absolutely many times better than to play on lower native fps.

[@TheOne214]

@@sh_chef92 no it doesnt if you play fast paced single player games you can instantly feel the hit in latency with frame gen it just generates fake frames and deceives your eyes by showing more frames in order to make the game feel more smoother however thats not the case i use dlss which is actually useful but i dont use frame gen.

[@JamieReynolds89]

What's the point in releasing a game like this on PC when a f 4080S can't even run it fine. It's ridiculous a £1000 GPU can't run a game. You'd expect a GPU that costs £1000 it shoukd be abls to run ANY game without FG, DLSS off etc. Bonkers.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

It really comes down to how demanding path tracing is. Without that on it runs fine

[@hanzobi1926]

It does run fine, I have a 4080 super and the game is more than playable with outout path tracing, even with Medium path tracing ON it’s still fine. Just enable DLSS and FG if you want more frames. Use the features of the card .

[@ikswoltokyrogerg8460]

This game runs great on a 4080 super as long as you don't enable path tracing. This is typical of new pc games over the last 30 years, some will not work maxed on current hardware. It makes it all the more fun to come back in a few years with new hardware. There are plenty of older games that will still cripple a 4090 if you crank the sett8ngs high enough. This game is very well optimized!

[@revanxl5612]

Not to mention it’s literally unplayable with anything before 20 series nvidia or 6000 series amd cards.

[@dirkdex]

You know - sometimes the game randomly does that. Restart the game and framerate goes back up to normal.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@dirkdex 16gb is just not enough vram for 4k path tracing in this game. Restarting made no difference but thanks for the suggestion

[@dirkdex]

@sounds correct for your particular example, however random massive frame drops similar to what you showed are a known issue that will hopefully be patched soon.

[@insparks782]

@@dirkdex I have seen that sometimes on my 4070Ti super at 1440p. Sometimes running close to exceeding your VRAM budget causes the game to get stuck in a state where it'll sort of cap your frame rate to 8 FPS. When you turn Ray Tracing down etc you'd expect to return to normal frame rates, but you'll still be stuck with something low like 20 FPS until you restart. It hasn't happened often for me, probably about 3 times in my whole playthrough.

[@GuerillaWar4s]

I thought my phone battery dropped to 10% and started lagging lol

[@BenchmarkBoy]

😂

[@kuro_shinigami7526]

With RTX 4060TI 16gb model 1080p maxed out settings full path tracing Dlss quality Frame Gen On In my whole play through of the game Lowest fps: 54 (only one time it hit like 45 in a specific area) Highest: 137 Avg: 80 In the first map i got between 64 and 74fps Then most of the game i got between 80~110fps And the map "sukothai" when you reach the part of using the boat and going to explore the open rever that's where shit gets real and the fos tanks the most i even registered 45fps but most of the time is 58fps and just by turning the RT to the second best option the fps went up to 75fps so yeah overall it's very playable experience with very very low input latency honestly didn't notice it all only in very rare occasion

[@Darkii1589]

Frame gen was giving you low fps because it maxed your vram, excessing 16gb, when you disabled it, the vram usage is less than 16gb

[@itstusk9495]

on pc Path Tracing Tanks FPS I'd advise turning off Path tracing for an fps boost even on Supreme!! I was testing it and it absolutely shocks me how much difference it is.

[@PiskenDragen]

No GPU can handle 4K in modern games, especially when there's no optimization whatsoever.

[@ARandomPerson-lg5ih]

Idk what your doing but I have the 4080 super and played with the same settings and got 54 fps

[@BenchmarkBoy]

This is native 4k with path tracing

[@DieChaosBoys1]

You say on start you dont have Pathtracing on but on 01:49 You have enabled pathtracing. Pathtracing only needs more than 16gb, it only goes on 24gb vram cards.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

when do i say at the start that path tracing isnt on?

[@revanxl5612]

Damn if this game tanks a 4080s this bad I couldn’t even imagine trying to play it on a console

[@AMD718]

Frame generation uses vmem and you're already at the limit with ultra texture streaming on your 16gb vmem gpu. This game needs a >16GB vmem GPU if you don't want to have to worry about vmem limitations. Lower texture streaming value and dlss fg will work fine.

[@TheOne214]

dont use FG it eats more Vram stick with DLSS

[@georgeandreou695]

I have the 4080 and get smooth 60fps at 4k, you need to set frame rate limit to 30, with FG on and DLSS Quality,, then take down texture pool size one level, maybe shadow qiality and hair detail as well. Everything else is ultra, and full RT.

[@keikurono4943]

In italy content creator said "GOOD optimization"..

[@vegakim]

use nvidia driver 566.14 then you get more fps. i got 30 fps more even with path tracing on. turn off ultra low latency in control panel, then frame gen will work normal :)

[@MyFaceHurtz]

frame gen needs lots of vram thats why your fps was tanking when you turned it on cause your vram was already full.

[@Gamer-q7v]

When it comes to lighting, reflections, shadows, and refractions, RT can render them way more accurately. For everything else, though, rasterization can do just as well as RT/PT. The focus for future ray-traced games should be increasing the number of rays and bounces for the effects that use RT instead of making the game fully path traced. That will have a much bigger improvement on visual quality and graphics.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@Gamer-q7v which game do you think has the best looking path tracing?

[@Gamer-q7v]

@@BenchmarkBoy If we are talking about the best-looking fully ray traced game, I would have to say AIan Wake 2. The graphics are absolutely mind-blowing in that game. The lighting, shadows, reflections, and refractions are next level.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@Gamer-q7v nice! I agree. I do like cyberpunk too especially in the city area at night

[@Gamer-q7v]

@@BenchmarkBoy Definitely. Cyberpunk also looks brilliant at night with all the neon lights.

[@bighousemusic628]

IMSUPRISE BECAUSE THE NEW INTEL B580 RUNS IT VERY FINE WITHOUT BUGS

[@LostMyPowerArmor]

people find new ways to play at 30 fps. on the other hand i have a 4060 and its unplayable to me under 100fps, fuck the visuals

[@nibblitzofficial]

So unless I'm misunderstanding the video, you turned path tracing on, a feature that is known to cripple even the 4090, and you're surprised that a lesser card is struggling with it. You then neglected to put it in the title or description, and only mentioned it in passing in the video. I'm really hoping I'm misunderstanding because if not, you are very much misleading people, and it seems very much intentional.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

How is it misleading people? Ive written the settings on the screen. It says clearly when ray tracing is on. It also says it in the description

[@nibblitzofficial]

@BenchmarkBoy ray tracing and path tracing are not the same thing.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@nibblitzofficial Path tracing is ray tracing, full ray tracing. From experience most people have no idea what path tracing is so I call it ray tracing/full ray tracing because people know what that is and it aligns with the naming of the in-game settings in most games (a lot of games don't call path tracing 'path tracing'). I do mention it's path tracing in the video. But there's definitely no intention of misleading from me. Just trying to make it as simple as possible

[@junaidywijaya]

will the FPS gets better if you pair with ryzen 3D CPU ?

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@junaidywijaya it's going to depend on the game. In this scenario there probably isn't much difference

[@gamergoku3265]

If you can't play even after paying so much, then what will you do?

[@danielallen7384]

With my 4080 Super, I get 120 fps on "Supreme" or max settings with RT off playing on my tv. If I put RT on low, I drop down to about 8 fps. Wtf??? It shouldn't make that much of an impact. Especially with RT on low.

[@hadoken05]

Today's game are not really optimized and some of it not looking that good either. Ryse came out 10 years ago and has much better looking jungle than this game

[@endlesshope007]

its just optimization, im getting over 70 fps on max everything on my 4080. I got everything maxed, dlss balanced, rt full everything on. new update helps a bit. also on 4k.

[@jakacresnar5855]

you don't have enough VRAM Besides the overlay showing 16 GB used at all times (though that could be allocation, not usage), this is further proven by the fact that FG makes the framerate drop. Frame generation uses more VRAM than FG off and any benefits of gained by decreasing texture pool size are lost when turning FG on. Even at 1440p it's still hovering just under 16 GB and would spill over eventually given enough playtime (less than 30 minutes would be my guess). But here's to the upcoming 5080 16 GB, yay nVidia, good job.

[@adrianivasku6400]

Upscaling is the biggest fraud with the new gpu. I want to play at native resolution if i buy a new gpu, dont sell me a gpu that in the end makes me play games at 1080.

[@n7eet]

we should demand a stop for over graphics on games

[@BenchmarkBoy]

How do you mean?

[@BestGameLoadouts]

I say what devs like Machine games are doing is just right... it performs really well and still looks good if you use the low and normal settings. If you want more you can have the power to push more. Why stop achieving new bounds in our tech and games to level the playing fields? Esp when there will always be plenty of performant and stylized games that don't push for that, even in the indie genre. The biggest players where always pushing hardware to the limits

[@nyariy]

Personally, I don't like the feel of frame generation. It makes mouse and keyboard feel slow prefer real frames to fake

[@petercruz1993]

Definitely should be playing this at 1440

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Try watch the full video. I do test it at 1440p as well

[@Tt-tt9my]

I’m so confused, I’m running Indy on a 7800XT 1440p on Supreme and it runs at 70-100 fps and it’s pretty good.

[@ehenningsen]

I ran this on my 4090, there is no objectively better looking game. But dang the resources 😂

[@BenchmarkBoy]

It looks great!

[@Tendollargameclub]

Yeah I figured this was going to be optimized like shit

[@druidaxel]

"Just look at the loight. " 😌

[@BenchmarkBoy]

innit

[@R6ex]

RTX 5090 will be needed to get nearer max settings ... LOL Probably around 25 fps only. 😅

[@dounavenpreston2944]

This literally going to be the new crisis

[@mghz01]

something is wrong with your setup, i get 70-95fps on a 12900ks and 4080 at 4k all maxed out native no dlss without path tracing

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Nothing wrong with the setup. This is 4k native with path tracing. I also get the same fps as you without path tracing

[@nicholasgeorge6367]

1440 or 1080p that’s good for me nothing else 4k is a hell for gpu water of money and resources

[@dikkie1120]

What kinda system does ppl.minimal need for the coming 2 years do you think?

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@dikkie1120 depends on the game settings and resolution and whether you're happy to use dlss and frame generation

[@RTX4080-z4t]

@@BenchmarkBoy what about if we play at 2k res maxed out with rt and dlss q +fg using a 4080 super and 7800x3d? how many years can it stand?

[@dikkie1120]

@BenchmarkBoy 4k dlss yes if needed

[@Livebasura69]

usually the frame generation when you are at 60 should bring you to 100 fps ... here 80 (1440p)

[@CPTFLEX]

I have a 4090 and got this game running kinda of okay I guess. But now I have a lighting issue and Iniana Jones hair is blonde and other lighting issues. I think I'll just wait for more updates lol.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Did the issues start after the latest update? Its crashing loads for me since the most recent update

[@CPTFLEX]

@@BenchmarkBoy I assume so cause I downloaded it the other day. I know this is probably a 10/10 game. I just hope it gets better optimization eventually. I feel Like high end pcs shouln't be having these issues.

[@insparks782]

That''s a bug with how the hair material's transparency properties interacts with full path tracing. Turning that down will fix it, although the environments will look somewhat worse.

[@markkrejic8736]

Is this game worth it

[@YouTube2020N]

Exactly something wrong with his game.. it's not a big game it's all about optimization.. see my live stream i could get 20 30 60 fps but it comes back to 1fps 2fps 5fps.. it's all random..

[@rockbottom8046]

Thats a bunch of crap. I have the same exact card and it performs exceptionally well. You guys are just clickbaiting for views. Lame video

[@BenchmarkBoy]

How is testing path tracing on a game clickbaiting for views? My whole channel is about benchmarking. I assume you dont have path tracing on if its performing exceptionally well

[@otrebor1261]

Will my 2070 run it with rtx at 4k?

[@haidora9321]

my friend plays fluid with a 4070ti Super, dont know why people destroy their games with using RT on the highest preset still. doesnt look much better than normal Illumination does tbh especially if its done right

[@BenchmarkBoy]

I'm not suggesting anyone should play with these settings. Its purely just a performance test to see how it does 🙂

[@alexcrypto21]

Imagine running it on AMD 💀

[@getawaydriver101]

Bro I have a 4070 in my core clock is 2990 is 2745 I need to turn high performance mode on in your Nvidia control panel not the Nvidia app and then make sure resize bar support is on in your bios and it should fix your FPS cuz I've never gotten an FPS lower than 120 on my 40 70 most of my games run in the 160s 200 240s my 1% lows is maybe 130 dlss works better than dlaa cuz AA is AI analyzing SS is super sampling and really super sampling just works better because it's been more designed than AA has been for a longer period of time AA is more for Crossfire or for if you're using more than 1 graphics card

[@OrientalStories]

Nvidia gpu totaly bottlenecked by the vram

[@SharpAD]

ive noticed when u fidle with dlss and fg and path tracing w/o restaring game everytime u change thos esettings fps is very low. Restartign the game brings fps up

[@nephilimslayer]

4080 cannot game at 4k, 4090 struggles with newer games at 4k so 4080 is a no go. the only gpu that would game fine at 4k is the 5090 next year, the 5090 would be the first gpu to support real 4k native at ultra settings without any dlss and framegen crap, i got myself last year 7900xt and i game at 3440p, its fine for now but ill uprgade again either with the 5090 or the 6090 when it comes out at 2027, by 2027 ill game at 3840p which is way better in my opinion compared to 4k

[@BenchmarkBoy]

4080 super is actually fairly capable at native 4k ultra settings you just cant use ray tracing/path tracing. This game does 70-80 fps at native 4k ultra without ray tracing

[@nephilimslayer]

@BenchmarkBoy 70fps is not enough, u need at least 90 to 100fps, that's why the 5090 will be the only capable GPU that can game native 4k at higher fps. 70fps is not high, it's only 10fps more than consoles which is nothing. I cannot game lower than 90fps, it feels laggy, if u see benchmarks with the 4090 at native 4k, in newer games it struggles to hit 90-100fps. that's why I didn't buy Nvidia cards this year. I went with a cheaper option, the 7900xt is plenty for 3440p and the price was sweet at around 800 euros when I got it. the 4080super is sitting at 1100-1200. we will see next year if the 5090 will be Worth the buy

[@ikswoltokyrogerg8460]

The 5090 will be a great 4k card for about 20 minutes.

[@MK0437]

By that guy’s wacko standards yeah the 5090 will be incapable of 4K quick.

[@nephilimslayer]

@MK0437 my standards are high because I want 120fps native 4k. u cannot get that then ur GPU cannot game at 4k, simple as that 4k 60 is not enough for me!

[@hombre-lusitano3414]

Hello FPS junky. I don´t care how much Frames I get per second. The only thing who matters is that the game runs well, without any stuttering or something like that. I have one KFA2 RTX 4080 Super and tried this game. Played around 90 minutes. I got in every scene 58-60 FPS. And it doesn't matter which settings I chooses. At UWQHD 3440x1440p All settings at max possible. DLSS on/off with quality or Performance. FG on and off. Absolutely nothing happens bad. All is running fine. I use DDR-4-3600 with Ryzen 5700x3D. Tried many other Games too. Like CP-2077. TB-Shadow off, Far Cry 6. I suggest another CPUs like the fine X3D Chips of AMD. Windows 11 with 23 H2 Update.

[@Asura0089]

So frame gen on gets you 22fps at most ?💀

[@BenchmarkBoy]

frame gen isnt really going to work when our vram is maxed out like that

[@oropher1234]

No it's not bugging out because of low fps. Frame Generation simply makes the VRAM overflow. Actually, framegen is basicallly unusable on a 4080 in this game. Even at 1440pDLSSquality and texture pool at Ultra, i go over the VRAM limit with my 4080 if i enable framegen. Without framegen it's fine though.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Could be that. Frame gen works fine for me at 1440p though and it works fine at 4k without path tracing even though im still maxing out the vram. Shouldnt really be enabling frame generation with that low fps either way because it can cause all kinds of other issues

[@oropher1234]

@@BenchmarkBoy hmm, well without path tracing i can surely use framegen. But with Full path tracing at 1440p it's basically still unusable.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@oropher1234 with dlss too or just frame gen?

[@oropher1234]

@@BenchmarkBoy DLSS as well. Could also vary between area's idk. But in the Vatican area i get regular heavy stutters when moving around, and no not the autosaving which causes minor blips.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@oropher1234 thats odd. If you have a look when i drop to 1440p with path tracing, dlss and fg its fine for me

[@Ace-Brigade]

That's crazy how many games look almost just as good or even sometimes as good and don't require that much vram...

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Got any specific games in mind?

[@Ace-Brigade]

@BenchmarkBoy I'm in bed sick right now, like it's taking all my energy to write this message kind of sick, but I will get to my steam, xbox, ubisoft, GOG, etc. library as soon as I'm feeling a little bit better and send you some examples that I think are a fair comparison.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@Ace-Brigade no problem. Hope you feel better soon!

[@shammy8703]

@@BenchmarkBoy crysis

[@goldensperm7182]

Lol u simply couldn't find a game. Stop spouting nonsense ​@Ace-Brigade

[@petertakacs7895]

drop texture quality your vram is full thats why its running so bad

[@JLONess]

me crying on 2060 not even super

[@BenchmarkBoy]

😬

[@Bozallite]

Seeing your cpu at 7% utilization doesn’t look good to me.

[@kinodvd1]

U never get cpu usage when pushing games to higher resolutions..playing 4K or even 1440p uses the graphics card instead or cpu. Some games uses both, like star citizen.

[@Bozallite]

@@kinodvd1 Yeah but the cpu has to be able to keep up with the frames being sent. It shouldn’t be at a low percentage in really any game unless you have a in ordinate amount of cores.

[@DragonEmperor-te6of]

Omg 40 gb of ram usage how much vram this need man it could well over 20gb of vran man💀💀💀

[@neti_neti_]

40GB ram usage, must be overflowing from VRAM😒😒; 32 GB VRAM ✌✌is minimum for this game.

[@stevedv629]

Game is running amazing for me at 4K with DLAA on, and fg on… ray tracing sucks turn it off

[@Raider0001]

nvidia will be trying to push 16gb rtx 5080 - im not buying it

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Thats going to be terrible for 4k with ray tracing/path tracing

[@rogerupgames]

Obviously this game isn’t optimized for PC like cyberpunk was for the ps4/xbox one😊

[@BenchmarkBoy]

😂 Didnt they remove cyberpunk from the ps4/xbox one stores at one point because it was so bad?

[@richardlauron6379]

It's 4k ultra dude... Why not use 2k? 😂

[@Loady420]

So crazy as shit. I have a 4080 OC the game was amazing. Nvidia did an update now it looks like shit I can't figure it out

[@Dr_a7madq8]

Why is it first person 😢

[@piranhax6466]

I've maxed 3860x1600 rt dlss balanced, frame gen and im running 120fps... woth 10900k and 4090

[@stefanburczymucha3352]

Frame gen doesnt like dlss quality in this game and to run better without stuttering and low fps i switched textures pool to high dlss on balanced with full rt on high last option disabled then i turned on frame gen and restarted the game 4070ti 3440x1440 hair on low or medium rest ultra around 70-90 fps at the beginnin

[@OverclockGamerzFX]

Pathtracing uses alot of vram. You need to lower path tracing

[@OverclockGamerzFX]

And 1440p is the sweet spot for gaming these days.

[@천년설-j9f]

누가 4K Ultra로 게임할려고 4080 super를 구입하나?

[@SuperCheesyMan]

Turn vsync on, you'll get a small fps boost

[@BenchmarkBoy]

no difference for me 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@SuperCheesyMan]

@BenchmarkBoy oh well I'm the lucky one then 🤷‍♂️

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@SuperCheesyMan how much fps does it give you? What settings are you using?

[@SuperCheesyMan]

​@@BenchmarkBoy I play in ultrawide 3440x1440, full RT with native TLAA/ vsync/HDR on. DLSS/FG off. I get between 55-70fps depend on the location 5900x/4090

[@RouvenZockt]

Why is this guy so overacting?

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@RouvenZockt who?

[@dustincary2081]

Overreacting to what?

[@JROCC0625]

1200$ gpu so 😆

[@Brandon_J]

He isn't?

[@rileyroberts-k1p]

th you mean he overreacting

[@roboticbeatz]

Need 24gb minimum and excellent 50gb vram

[@TheOne214]

The gpus already are so expensive and you saying here 50 gb of vram yeah not gonna happen

[@ionutortian5885]

I tray many setings and this game look better if some of obtions are not at max

[@BenchmarkBoy]

@@ionutortian5885 can you share what settings you're using?

[@Ionathan-Szanto]

40 gb ram usage 💀

[@shammy8703]

good video

[@BenchmarkBoy]

Thanks!

[@turnaisbestsuit]

Thats at 4k ultra with no frame gen and no dlss so i mean 🤷

[@BenchmarkBoy]

if you watch the full video you'll see that even dlss and frame gen doesnt really save it

[@turnaisbestsuit]

@BenchmarkBoy that's rough

[@Draguny.M]

So there are some games that you don't even can play it at full capacity with actual tops gpu?! What are for then?

[@simlife445]

wellif u dont knwo then u dont the origal marbles demo was on a8k server gpu... and it was 720p 30fps... so this video is cringe x10 a3090 a INSANLY expensive gpe is 2k 30 fps... sop you pushign million apopon millions for extra pisles per second EVERY single second... is uing a 7-9x the cost of the cosnles what paly the game well... your your super rich... stupid... or using n the richest compay inthe world pushing to remove jobs... even jobs like yours...i cllllearrrrrllllllylly x200000 billion didnt watch or undersatnd thefrist ray tracing games... that are math im right... are zooming in on a car door or wall at 10fps and its mech at best... if i could do a huge report and sue u for lacking 2020 console tech let alone navida the trillion dollar companys math have a good lawyer i would assume u are paied.. im either right or super smart to a child...

[@WheeledHamster]

So no PT with RTX 4080.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

at least not at 4k. You can make it doable at 1440p depending on your settings

[@TheAcadianGuy]

16gb of vram ain't enough for 4k

[@allxtend4005]

with Path Tracing and 4k ... no it is not enough, but yea people keep buying the bad product becaus they dont know it better and at the end they defend ther choices instead of be real that the hardware they bought was not made for ther Needs and the game itself is not bad made technical, it is just htat a 4080 super that cost around 1300$ just has 16gb vram, even 20gb will do way better then 16gb.

[@BenchmarkBoy]

4k path tracing is really the problem. Without path tracing you'll be fine with 16gb at 4k