Rumors Begin for Vision's Future

Image in thumbnail is from: 618media.com/e...
● Tailosive Tech Plus: www.youtube.co...
● Podcast: / tailosivepodcasts
● Contact: x.com/tailosiv...
Intro chime by: / randyvazquez

[@Aggie4life77]

For a cheaper VP, I think running a wire to the phone makes sense. For the glasses, I think it can do it wirelessly like the Apple Watch does. It sends certain things to the phone for processing via app.

[@dsquareddan]

Remember when Jon Prosser came out with a huge video about the “Steve jobs heritage edition” glasses rumour, and then scrubbed it from the internet lol.

[@truecuckoo]

Waveguide glasses with individually dimmable zones to be able to display the projected overlay in any lighting conditions. Notice how Meta chose to showcase Orion in a kinda dark blue painted room. Likely to be able to assure visibility against a darker background. On a sunny day outdoors I have a hard time thinking it’ll be very visible.

[@pascool182]

I agree with the very simplified ar glasses attached to a iphone 15pro/16/17

[@X139T]

6:15 ARE YOU HEARING THIS TIM APPLE? GOOD MORNANG!!! TAKE SOME NOTES

[@EverythingCameFromNothing]

I agree. They could even take it one step further and have a super high power computer box in your house and then super thin phone and laptop interfaces that offload intense processing to the box,

[@adrianramos4721]

I think that what might work would be a simple lightweight visor/glasses that just clones your phone screen, like the new macOS does, but on your face. Like an Apple watch, but for your eyes.

[@jeong-ilkajokaya3849]

That should what the vision Pro should have been from the beginning. Use the iPhone or Mac for the computing and use the glasses as screen for the vision OS.

[@jdarg4163]

Meta Orion is the future and its a break though in technology in the AR glasses sector

[@suninmoon4601]

Seems to me that the Apple Vision Pro is in a different market segment than Apple Glasses. The best use case for AVP is watching media and gaming. While Apple Glasses could work best as an iPhone interface for wearing in public. Imagine: an Apple Wristband sensing vitals--pulse, blood pressure, blood-oxygen levels, etc.--connected via Bluetooth to an iPhone, doing most of the computational work using Apple Intelligence, interfaced with Apple Glasses which were indistinguishable from everyday sports glasses...🧐

[@shadygamererfan377]

But I only got two kidneys😂😂

[@suninmoon4601]

@@shadygamererfan377 Dude 😅

[@shadygamererfan377]

@@suninmoon4601 you won't believe me when I was a child one day I was catching insect in a cemetery and I was confused when I saw a two insects similar looking but some how they were different so I thought what if I make a glass which could used insect data to help me distinct between different kind of insect and show their name on top of them but I didn't have billions of dollars back and now I'm still poor but happy to see that human is capable of making such kinda device just by their imagination!

[@corvacopia]

By that wrist band, do you mean the Apple Watch?

[@suninmoon4601]

@@corvacopia No! No watch. No time. Just a sensor. All information is displayed through AR glasses.

[@extjerry]

Changed the world? More like changed the first week then everyone forgot about it

[@swiftuiforever]

Talk about yourself.

[@Askellad101]

@@swiftuiforeverHe’s kinda right tho. There was a fuck ton of hype in the first 2 weeks, then it just died out fast. Nobody’s talking about the Vision Pro, Netflix and KZbin are still not available, and they haven’t sold even nearly as many units as they predicted. Reviewers are talking about how they haven’t picked up the Vision Pro since the review.

[@Mmm.GrilledCheese]

That’s… exactly what everybody said about the first iPhone… and look at where we at now

[@crackedpistachio6001]

telling me you are broke without telling me you are broke

[@justas9541]

iSheeple does this rub sand in your pajamas? Next tittle "apple change the universe by adding an extra button" 😂

[@JosephRawsthorne31]

Snapchat did camera on glasses back in the day and i got a pair 😂

[@toututu2993]

But is it AR capabilities?

[@JosephRawsthorne31]

@@toututu2993 no but this was like 2016 tho

[@AcesMR6]

How do u like them?

[@sebjoe3752]

THE APPLE VISION PRO NEEDS THAT NEW CAMERA FEATURE FROM THE NEW iPhone ⭕️

[@Tradelikeace]

I hope so I’m a big fan of the Vision Pro also got my 16 pro max when it was ready to buy on day 1 how ever I have been having screen glitching problems on it random glitches just show up randomly

[@malcolmhightower9407]

These digital glasses should be like a peripheral, not a stand alone device.

[@noahkirkpatrick8912]

Like big screen headset with inside out and pass-through looking at 1500 max

[@SwedeInCPH]

Amazing how youtubers take credit for “inventing” things already announced and serving the obvious.

[@QuentinAnthonyAnderson]

I am surprised how definitive your takes are in an industry where radical change happens regularly. To say that using a phone will ALWAYS be the best option is pretty bold - reminds me of all the takes that swore typing on a screen would never be the preferred option over typing on a physical keyboard like BlackBerry. Just... Maybe leave some room for likely innovations and the unpredictability of human behavior.

[@TailosiveTech]

I’ve reviewed multiple. What you’re both forgetting is not every piece of tech is massively successful. There’s all kinds of “radical changes” that never go anywhere like 3D TVs, curved phones, or folding tablets. Not everything goes somewhere

[@mimo5383]

I've adored my own Viture glasses so can totally see this coming.

[@philipehusani]

Meta embarrassed Apple and Cupertino is panicking.

[@sonybluraydisk]

oh please

[@j0shj0shj0sh]

I would wear them only if I was skiing.

[@louis_ricks]

I’m all for the glasses, but they have to be useful and somewhat subdued, style wise. I don’t wanna look like a dork in public…(I’m already a dork at home, but shhh…🤫)

[@toututu2993]

VR/AR can be extremelu useful but without a huge vatieties of softwares supports like you see on pc and phones. It hindered its potential which is much more massive than the 2 I mentioned

[@unmagicalmushroom]

Apple is not going to make their own version of the Meta Ray Bans. Their whole brand is based less on making the best products and more on creating the best user experience. I don’t see them creating a product which doesn’t have any apps, animations or worthwhile user interactions, other than taking photos which you can already do with the iPhones they’ve spent all this time and money investing in.

[@AnupomAG]

The only thing Vision pro did was making The Meta Quest 3 a better value product 😂 a great unintentional indirect marketing. No really that actually increased metas sales 😅.

[@John-uk3wz]

I definitely see AR glasses the way you do, as an iphone accessory. Much like the apple watch.

[@jcolombo100]

There will always be 2 separate categories, one for immersive media consumption and intense work loads and the other for everyday communication, browsing, notifications etc the glasses being powered by the iPhone is a great idea, enhancing your iPhone experience partner that with your AirPods and health features with the Apple Watch and you are all set

[@TheiTunesFanboy]

I think that it would be a good idea for Apple to develop a Vision Pro that relies on one’s iPhone.

[@SheikAshii]

Future iphones are going to use a form of wireless to do most of the glasses processing and they will only need to have a battery that keeps it on for long enough. I'm thinking like what apple can do with continuity between the iPad and mac. But with iPhone and glasses.Doesn't have to work in full capacity when phone is not near by. I think this is he way until everything gets smaller in even further away versions where we just have the glasses

[@xcalibur1011]

A LOT OF PLACES WOULDN'T ALLOW PEOPLE WEAR SMARTGLASSES IN CERTAIN PLACES AND THEY'RE TO DISTRACTING AND UNSAFE TO WEAR. SO USE YOUR SO-CALLED SMARTPHONE AND HEADPHONE SAFELY AND STAY ALERT OF YOUR SURROUNDINGS WHILE DOING SO.

[@PassportBrosBusinessClass]

If Apple could actually make a pair of iGLASSES, they’d be a $5 Trillion dollar company quick. Vision Pro was cool but $4000 toys don’t sell. It’s basically been forgotten.

[@PassportBrosBusinessClass]

@@Rollampert Sorry: I don’t argue with poors ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@laberflash767]

@@PassportBrosBusinessClass aren't you the poor loser who begs for cash app money in their channel description hahahahaa 🤣🤣

[@PassportBrosBusinessClass]

@@Rollampert Says the loser with 17 subscribers

[@laberflash2081]

@@PassportBrosBusinessClass hahaha who is begging for cash app money on their YT About Me? you are 🤣

[@sfkeepay]

An AppleVision without that peak display experience would be a huge change, and personally, I’d be looking for a different headset. Ditch the exterior display? Wouldn’t miss it. Offload some processing tasks to wired iPhone? Interesting idea…that might work. Make it lighter? Yes, please. But downgrade the display? It’s is the only reason I got one.

[@CarlRyds]

Back on the Zoom Mic?

[@tsaprodigy2166]

Vision Pro will have some Apple intelligence features in visionOS 3 guaranteed. They’ll use current devices to gain insight and best ways to implement until then.

[@jwolpert]

I don’t get how transparent glasses are a good idea for a great and inexpensive product. The optics issues are fundamental and hard. Rather what if the fully occluded vision approach were reduced to something that looked like dark sunglasses. You don’t need external displays showing your eyes, because people are used to the “sunglasses at night” look. And we’ve seen with vision that the displays you’re are looking at wearing the device can be low-latency and high-res enough handling the pass-through from the front camera to make you feel like you’re looking through transparent lenses. This, imo, is better, because it works in all lighting conditions and is a more practical way to get the kind of visual experience we want.

[@davide2268]

I feel like a magsafe battery on the iphone plugged into or wireless to vision pro would be the way.

[@_mattaeus_]

People also forget… adding cellular radios will burn through batteries.. plus in the cramped space they are currently dealing with and struggling to keep down…. Cellular radios will also need to be fitted… so don’t see any glasses replacing a smartphone any time soon…

[@goobfilmcast4239]

I think the idea of wearing some variation of the AVP in public "full time" will be kind of a problem. Remember the Google Glass backlash when normies got pretty pissed about knuckleheads potentially recording them without their knowledge. I still see these primarily as Monitor and Flat screen "replacements" rather than recording devices. I hope Apple focuses on the entertainment and full immersion aspect for introverts and misanthropes.... like me 😎

[@benjiebarker]

1:00 apple vision pro screens are high res but low frequency...

[@didiervandendaele4036]

Only one solution : ORION 😂 Light , unobtrusive , future !

[@jeanpierreeleroy6995]

The point of smart glasses is spatial intelligence

[@Katkayz]

Apple glasses for $500 would sell like hot cakes

[@RichardServello]

Nobody wants another VR device. We want a pair of regular glasses that take over for the iDevices.

[@BR0KK85]

Apple has got themselves into a cornor with the price. This thing is expensive and wont feature now stuff. The next tjing they're putting out here must have new features and be better but for a less steep price. The ones that bought the first one for that price will be pissed if their expensive stuff wont get the same feature treatment ...

[@jamesburland]

I have to assume that Apple will focus on weight and cost over the next 5 to 10 years. We'll see Apple Vision drop in price and drop in weight, and that will lead to a much bigger uptake of this important product. Meta’s Orion shows where things will go in the next 4 to 5 years. Of course, by then we may already have AGI, so who knows where things will go!

[@InimitaPaul]

Apple will ensure anything they release is proprietary and as such they won’t be able to touch X-Real’s offerings. There’s no way they’ll allow it to be used with pretty much any USB C device and that will hamstring it, they’ll sell to Apple fanboi’s but those of us who want “open source” AR glasses won’t touch Apple Vision and especially at Apple prices.

[@ruzzelladrian907]

The Vision Pro might be a flop, but the fundamentals of it such as its software and hardware technologies are going to shape the future.

[@brettdawson3257]

The N109 is already on the way

[@PrestoMoto02]

 will probably make a flying car either

[@kevinpoinsett]

I would not want to burn my phone battery up using some lame VR contraption...call me crazy, sounds terrible

[@corvacopia]

We’d just have to use a wireless charger or something

[@lmbue]

bro who asked for that eye screen shit it just needs to be as light a possible, the ski mask, black eyes look is cool anyways, nobody needs to what you're looking at or if you can see them anyway. like maybe in the future but imo the primary focus should be weight, they have everything else on lock. edit: also i dont anyone would complain or knock the quality if it were all lighter plastics or carbon, im not sure if magnesium or titanium is any lighter but like i was saying weight is the biggest issue with the current market imo. and i agree with the puck, offload as much compute as possible that also doesnt bother me personally as long as it's wireless like Orion

[@efeozturk5253]

vision air would probably cost like 9.999 usd. when that happens I will fully stop taking apple seriously :)

[@RiqMoran]

this is a product that will never be viable until its shrunken down to glasses. but then its in that apple watch territory where the form factor is a massive compromise and a traditional interface is superior in every way.

[@soapghost007]

Imagine a company leading the way with AR and LiDAR technology on their phones and tablets for years, but then comes out with a VR headset… 🤦‍♂️🤡 Apple lost its “vision” when Steve Jobs died.

[@Jamesthor]

Apple found that there is a maximum that people are willing to pay for technology. Oops.

[@GamingWithNeytiri]

there's already a normal pair of glasses that can do the some but no, in 5 years from now apple will still come out with a whole headset.

[@password953]

Banger intro Followed by “Mark Gurman’s Bloomberg” 😂😂😂😂

[@jovar7545]

The Reading why Apple cant Release Apple Glass is that siri is still so Bad, unlieb Metas Lama

[@DwAboutItManFr]

Transparent optics? hahaja

[@Luminin_CPR]

Is it me or has the audio gotten a bit of a downgrade here? Noticing a bit of popping and crackling on some of these newer videos. Great content, I need your down-to-earth thoughts to keep me grounded.

[@GamingWithNeytiri]

once again (just like when the first iphone came out) other companies are doing it way better already.

[@adversHandle]

to be fail everyone who had ever used a VR headset before called out the reported weight of it as an issue before anyone ever tried it on so they should have seen that coming.

[@droppyalmond1111]

The fuck? Are you making this off a script made by Siri?!

[@jdarg4163]

Apparently they won't be using a M chip in the next vision headset theybwill almost certainly be using the A Series of chips like the iPhone the M5 will be on the vision pro 2

[@corvacopia]

There is no way that any Apple Vision device will use a less powerful chip than the iPad Air

[@MindRiderFPV]

Ads in your face 24/7. 😂 no thanks.

[@Instant_Nerf]

Go lower ? No

[@aljawad]

The main issue with the Apple Vision is that it still happens to be a “solution-looking-for-a-problem”; (plus the other issues relating to comfort of use, cost, AI integration, … etc.). As of now, it’s a high-tech version of a “Rube Goldberg machine”!

[@MarcusWarcus40]

Is a bigger tv a “solution looking for a problem”? 🤨

[@acslater017]

I fundamentally disagree with your premise of solving problems. “Here’s the problem everyone acknowledges, here’s the solution that plugs that hole” is how infomercial products work, not breakthroughs. We’re so used to digital content being on glass rectangles *we don’t see it as a problem* and we see any different way of doing things as a gimmick. But real breakthrough products give people what they didn’t even know they wanted. I’ve owned a Vision Pro since launch day and it’s fundamentally changed how I enjoy home videos and photos - viewing spatial videos, 3D photos, and wraparound panoramas of personal memories is an amazing experience. It is also the hands down the best solo TV/movie watching experience I’ve ever had, akin to having your own theater. Short-sighted people mocked the imperfect appearance of the Personas, but when you chat with another Vision user honestly you notice it for about 1 minute, you get used to it, and then it feels like the person is there in your room. Viewing Immersive Video of nature, sports, and music content is stunning. The natural Environments are near photo-realistic and help me focus and relax. These are breakthrough experiences impossible on traditional devices. Fundamentally, Vision Pro (and other VR platforms) enables digital content to be freed from the glass rectangles they’ve been trapped on for 40 years. You’re in the memory, you’re at the sporting event, you’re surrounded by the nature wallpaper, your friend across the country is in your room. I don’t disagree that the price and weight needs to go down, the number of apps and video content needs to go up. But you’re completely mistaken to dismiss the Vision Pro. Take a look at the 25 year track record of people shooting down 1st gen Apple devices and ask who ended up being on the right side of tech history.

[@markstuart9545]

You’ve lost weight. Good work bro

[@ien2023]

Apple over engineer again at a premium that no can afford or even care except for the crazy fanboys.

[@TopMaverick-k4o]

The Vision Pro (and VR/AR headsets in general) are just a smartphone for the face

[@dethswurl117]

"VR glasses would still have a hard time taking selfies or doing video calls" That is exactly why Vision (and now, Meta) are making 3d models of the wearer to show during video calls. I think the eventual replacement of phones with wearable tech is inevitable.

[@TailosiveTech]

Would be incredibly cringey for work calls. But also not a replacement at all for taking selfies which many people do

[@dethswurl117]

@@TailosiveTech It sounds cringey now, but so did many other things in the past like emojis & Snapchat filters which the vast majority of the population use now. Most people in video calls already use a virtual background to mask imperfections, imagine if people could do the same with their entire body. I'd imagine girls would take not having to do their hair and makeup every time they do a video call over the ability to take a selfie. It's a somewhat grim future but an extremely likely one based on past societal behaviors.

[@GamingWithNeytiri]

aside from ipads, apple is literally a loser company.

[@christianmccauley7340]

Gross dude, an ai thumbnail? Don’t you respect yourself?

[@dylanwhite6539]

I mean apple will never cannibalize one of its existing products. Just look at the iPad

[@Äpple-pie-5k]

Are you sure? Macbook Air cannibalizes Macbook Pro.

[@dylanwhite6539]

@@Äpple-pie-5k it, literally doesn’t though? The air is in no way better than the pro in anything but weight.

[@Äpple-pie-5k]

@@dylanwhite6539 Exactamundo my friend. Vision Air will be in no way better except weight, either.

[@corvacopia]

@@dylanwhite6539in virtually everything except io, the que is better than the lowest tier “pro”

[@willharrah9381]

Really great video. I use glasses and I’m really excited for Apple to make a smart glasses product

[@gibamach]

Yeah, you will get that model on 2078

[@MarliePagano]

And nobody cares.

[@S.E.C-R]

It doesn’t feel like AVP has been out for 80 years and 8 months already … it only feels like 8 months. Time really flies! ⏰🪰🪰