Russia's DEADLIEST Fighter jet | Su-57 Airshow Performance

[@lwty]

I was there in this year’s Zhuhai Airshow. Su-57 was extremely impressive. The maneuverability of Su-35 was already great enough. But Su-57 is just another level.

[@HuckThis1971]

A country in war will never send their best and latest aircraft. This is certainly an ftv. Pilot didn't even push this aircraft to its limits. The west is watching.

[@korana6308]

Where were you guys standing? I was trying to find it on the map. And realized that you were standing outside of the airport? behind the fences?

[@Dgrze]

@@korana6308 you are so cool...

[@HansMe2]

Dear pilot, Su 34 pilots were able to Maneuver and escape very fast patriot missiles. You can find the audio on youtube.

[@Juandinggong]

@@HansMe2 SU-34 is one of my absolute favorite its a beast of an aircraft!

[@aviktorrusso657]

@@Juandinggong Да он красавчик но он в основном бомбардировщик и на половину охотник. ))

[@batas6560]

when I opened the video thinking that I got to the review of a professional pilot, but I got to an envious whiner 😂

[@forcegfgf3123]

They crying silently 🤣

[@СергейМестечко-ю8к]

,, ЛАВРЫ ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНОСТИ,, - НЕ ДАЮТ ПОКОЯ ,,ЗДРАВЫМ МЫСЛЯМ,, !!! ...это беда !,,

[@rdengin]

​@@forcegfgf3123Because this is how the professionals do it!

[@Ncs-Charlie]

Avg American hating on anything which is not made in America 😂😂

[@RussoTuristoLeo]

Apple((((

[@avimaltzman5673]

I am not an American, not do I hate anything except hubris. Aviation is my profession. If you'd bother you could find my creds. I am not hiding behind an Avatar. Did you finish highschool? Do you have a driver's license yet? Or you're still sitting in your mom's basement and thinking that masturbation is sex?

[@Max_Da_G]

@@avimaltzman5673 He said "average American". You clearly aren't an average American in the comments section. Go to The War Zone of The Drive and read the comments. You'll see the amount of Russia-haters jumping like insane onto anyone who isn't one of the pack of rabid dogs.

[@Verified-Vee]

😂

[@СтаниславЗайцев-с2н]

I work for a company that develops equipment for the Su-57. The T-50 has almost all the avionics from the Su-35S, except for the AFAR radar. The serial Su-57 has completely new avionics and a new multicore computer and NeuroMatrix neural computing system. The production car is covered with a stealth coating, the 101 Atoll circular defense system is installed, and since December of this year all Su-57s from the factory are coming with a new engine that provides the Su-57 with supersonic cruising speed without afterburner up to Mach 2.

[@user_7123_Marushka]

Наконец-то кто-то внятно написал, чем серийный 57 отличается от прототипа. Спасибо 🫶

[@Almaz159]

Именно вот так и собирается по крупицам информация о новейшем стратегическом вооружении. Молодец ! Не забудь в следующем своём комментарии указать ссылку на чертежи и документы со своей работы.

[@Max_Da_G]

@@Almaz159 "Kto das pravilniy otvet, tot poluchit 20 let" ;)

[@Almaz159]

@@Max_Da_G 100%

[@Инквизиторрасплатапридет]

Двигатели у нас в Уфе делают

[@obj4298]

Saw this plane, takes off in less than10s.....ITS UNREAL! No mention in video.

[@avimaltzman5673]

Former. A4 driver here. So? How does it help to operate against the Western A2 / AD? this Potyomkin piece will be downed before its pilot could say "Yob Tvoyu Mat".

[@elif_yusuf]

​@@avimaltzman5673f22+f35 =СУ 57

[@iain8837]

Cause that’s what sells aircraft. What’s next, F22 replaced by a girocopter.

[@albertpotter9787]

Like a small Bush Plane

[@jcarvalho1500]

@@obj4298 of course it is! You're lucky! I would die to see this in real life! This jet in itself is absolutely impressive and it has new aerodynamic solutions never used before. Look at those levcons! Some don't acknowledge this because of ignorance or just emotionally affected ego.

[@alexkor380]

At air shows and demonstration flights, the best test pilots land the plane. this applies to everyone, Americans and Russians and other countries. at the same time, there is one immutable fact. The Americans, with their super planes, always rejected the Russians’ invitations to a demonstration air battle.

[@ДедКузьмич-о2о]

В 1992 году на базе Лэнгли были проведены показательные бои между российскими и американскими летчиками. Все бои американцы проиграли.

[@avimaltzman5673]

@@ДедКузьмич-о2о The 1992 BFM dog fights DON'T demonstrate air force or pilots' capabilities. Contrary to your earth-dweller's assumption, the objective of the USAF was not "pissing competition". These exercises are conducted under strict predefined parameters and, in that case were conducted by the USAF to measure and performance characteristics of the Soviet planes, while the Russians' (not the pilots, the VVS) objective was to show who's better. You folk, missed the point how the US professionals work. In addition, the pilots that came to the US, were the cream of the Crop of the VVS. There are a a dozen really good Russian pilots. Most Russian pilots today fly much less than 100 hours a year (Mind you that in Israel we fly more than 250 sorties a year, not including the Sim sessions). BTW, look up how we owned your "aces" in 1970 and in 1982. In 1982. the two pilots that after been downed by us, spent a while in the Haifa Hospital. They were to touched by our doctors, nurses and 504 unit, both did not want to go back to the Soviet Union. Great guys, btw. Smoked like chimneys, unfortunately.

[@Parim_pravilno]

@@ДедКузьмич-о2опричем американцы ещё пользовались Аваксами, русские летали в слепую и выиграли😊

[@alexkor380]

@@ДедКузьмич-о2о насколько я знаю - это было НЕ авиашоу. Тот бой был "закрытым" и его результаты на некоторое время американцы засекретили.

[@aviktorrusso657]

@@ДедКузьмич-о2о По словам Американцев была нечья )) Русские пилоты просто охренели и не знали что сказать когда Американский генерал на вопрос от прессы кто выиграл выдвинул такое, но Русские почемуто промолчали наверное что были у них в гостях и не хотели их опозорить. )) И да ещё у Американцев даже работали АВАКСЫ не хило так лаханулись а может и специально проиграли. ))))

[@spartacusreview]

The Airframe been able to withstand these Manoeuvres is very impressive

[@ottobyte]

I think the forces on the jet at slower speeds are much more benign than at higher speed/G.

[@Juandinggong]

@@spartacusreview it’s especially made for that! To be able to dog fight with all its payload

[@cuthbertadam9694]

Truthful comments from other people are nowadays BOTS, grow a chest and take the comments like a man.

[@krendel49]

Russians, don't feed American bots with your comments. Just enjoy the video taken at the air show.

[@name.4715]

I piloti russi sono i migliori al mondo e gli aerei e i caccia sono i migliori al mondo. I russi eseguono tali acrobazie nel cielo e nessuno può farlo. E' vero.

[@tukituki7680]

💯

[@giuliobrandone1479]

Ma gli americani sono estremamente gelosi ,e non lo ammettono

[@UA_UKRAINE_7]

Найкращі пілоти в Україні ,знайди відео як на су-27 пілот України зайняв 1 місце

[@imrussian6638]

@@UA_UKRAINE_7 Да у вас всё самое лучшее 😂И лётчики тоже, особенно призрак Киева 😂

[@UA_UKRAINE_7]

@imrussian6638 🤡 Іван Кожедуб,😂це кацапік 😂😂😂😂

[@xro-d7k]

Bro, I'm not a bot 😀I just wanted to see this "new" jet flying with a professional commentary and I watched your video. Sorry

[@Juandinggong]

Why this guy is deleting comments? Got to have thick skin if you wanna make videos and express your opinion be ready to hear what people have to say!!

[@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я]

This is a typical position of bloggers now. they just lie. Orthodoxy describes the complete collapse of the United States and NATO when the war begins. Russia will show crushing force. And by the way, Russian dominance in the air is also described there.

[@sharkcat1021]

Smol d energy, criticize but can't take criticism. Imagined if Russia built a junk like F35.

[@Fullgrym]

99% of the time it is youtube who deletes comments. I see this happen to myself daily - no matter the topic, no matter the language the comment is written in, my comments disappear literally less than a minute after posting.

[@Fullgrym]

@@yadayadayadayadayadayada777 I don't know if it's (only) about filters, I think there are some topics that put you in a blacklist for a type of "shadowban" for a while. As I said - my comments were disappearing even when written in my mother's language, Bulgarian. Not english, not german, not spanish - some widespread languages that have established bot models to filter comments, but a small eastern-european cyrillic language. Also on rare occasions I've tried to copy my post and repost it with slight changes to avoid any potential "bad words". Nothing helps, if youtube has decided I must not post comments, I can't post comments.

[@jcarvalho1500]

I've seen western fighter jets doing really cool unpractical stunts and nobody roast them like some western youtuber pilots, experts or whatever, keep doing when it is a russian jet. I understand that. After all they have to convince themselves somehow that they are capable and superior, protect their confidence and find some comfort within their ego. Or maybe they don't have nothing else to do, I don't know. Nevertheless this manoeuvrability goes as a show off and it is AWSOME! Just accept the fact and that's it. Russians have a really good reason to take aerodynamics and manoeuvrability in consideration as it is quite practical somehow. Maybe not for the Americans but in Europe it is a must, so just take the SU 34 bomber dodging 3 patriot missiles, as an example. Russians can be proud about those 3d thrust nozzles or not?! Besides, we all know no western airforce messes around, not even with SU27s during interseptions. Our pilots are not allowed and they would be in a lot of trouble provoking a dog fight with those things. These are the real world situationns russians have to take in consideration and they are succeeding. The SU57 has been flying in Ukraine without being detected and they have no rush to mass produce it because they don't need to. They can have more time to improve the thing the way they feel it is necessary, and although I'm quite sure they don't underestimate wstern tech like you do with them, they don't care much about planes like for example the f22 as it is not a threat to them at all. F15s, F18s, F16s, Rafales, Typhoons, Gripens and now F35s, are their biggest concern and they have more than capable machines to take care of these, and guarantee their air superiority. If not, they eventually find new practical solutions. And by the way, it's not because someone thinks different that he/she is russian, or a bot. Got it?

[@ЂорђеКозић]

When and if a hot war breaks out between Russia and the US, when it comes to the air war, 99,9% it's going to be US jets flying into RU airspace on SEAD missions. Instead of trying to outright match the US air power, where they have a superiority in sheer number of platforms and crews, RU relies on it's massive anti-air capability to 'thin out the herd'. Sure, some launchers and radars will get hit but, considering that a single S-300 battery consists of up to 12 launchers, ie. up to 48 missiles per battery, you can bet that even with a lowball interception rate, a lot of those US pilots are not going to be coming home. In that case, IF the Russian AD has done it's job sufficiently well and the majority of the RU air force has been saved during the initial US engagement, suddenly their air force becomes significantly more dangerous.

[@jcarvalho1500]

@ЂорђеКозић that's the old Cold War philosophy and why the F22 was developed. Today US main enemy is China, not Russia.

[@ЕленаМороз-и3л]

​@@ЂорђеКозићПочему вы такие тупые? 🤔Демократически бомбить Ирак, Ливию, Югославия, Сирию, Вьетнам и другие страны - только это могут делать американцы.И рассказывать про могущество их армии 🤔🤦‍♀️🥴Вы серьёзно?

[@backspace5254]

​​@@ЕленаМороз-и3лЛена, не пойми не правильно. Однако тут человек расписал сценарий, при котором американцы продуют нашим ПВО, т.к. смысла нам выпускать наших пилотов нет из-за большего кол-ва авиации противника (опять же, сценарий выдумка (и слава богу, не хочется чтобы люди в принципе друг друга убивали)). И причём тут военные интервенции (скорее уж военные преступления) амеров? Тут же вообще другой вопрос обсуждается.

[@sermoz2362]

All Americans who review the Su57 when discussing maneuvers make the same mistake, do they all consider the Su57 as a fighter analogue of the F22? but this is not so, the Su57 is a multi-role aircraft, it is designed not only for air supremacy but also for striking ground targets, surface targets, and most importantly, it works as an AWACS and can coordinate both air and ground operations. This is why many maneuvers for quickly assessing the radar situation.

[@SsnoopNinja]

They are not even out to the real world can they even flight? how u know all tha bullshit that u just typed...

[@ЮрийТитов-и7м]

@@SsnoopNinja Are you so sure? do some research man. They are flown in the Ukraine war for starters. Not only that but actual video on the social media that confirms SU57 with a operational drone Ohotnik. Look it up

[@solestring]

​@SsnoopNinja 😂😂😂😂😂

[@NajobNamlok]

@@SsnoopNinja wow you are expert for aviation

[@antasosam8486]

You wish

[@Almaz159]

An american does not realize what he sees and cannot comprehend the uniqueness of everything.😏

[@pauk4272]

Exactly ❤

[@ЮрийТитов-и7м]

Aw come on! I think he did a pretty good job evaluating the pros and cons. He didn't just say bad things about it. to my mind he told us the pros for as much as he could justify from a video. I bet he would love it if he gets in one) but what do i know im just a couch judge =)

[@bryanb6931]

American here, This is one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. The control he has over the aircraft is freaking outrageous, absolutely crazy. I've been to a few air shows but haven't seen anything like this before.

[@thepullahirubc5347]

As far as I know, that aircraft is the prototype T-50-4.

[@aviktorrusso657]

Это название он нёс пока был в тестах а сегодня он взят на вооружение и его название Су 57

[@Mr_McAlex]

@@aviktorrusso657 Он имеет ввиду, что это не боевой или серийный самолёт, а тестовый. Боевые самолёты сделаны более качественно и модернизированные, а также засекречены.

[@aviktorrusso657]

@@Mr_McAlex А чем этот не качественный ? и тем более он взят на вооружение Российской Армии. И к тому же когда он был тестовым назывался Т50 а теперь Су 57.

[@Mr_McAlex]

@@aviktorrusso657 Я писал именно про этот самолёт и не писал, что он не качественный. А различия между тестовой моделью и серийной, вы сможете в инете поискать. Например: обшивка планера более качественно собрана (сопряжение деталей плотней) и покрыта противорадиоволновым составом, начинка самолёта изменена, электронных систем больше, двигатели другие, более мощные и экономичные установлены и т.д.

[@maksimluzin1121]

All jets are producing smoke at very low speed, because of low oxygen intake. It's just physics, and nothing more. Less oxygen -> more smoke... I'm wonder why an ex-pilot don't know about that...

[@erikpeterffy7552]

Many people believe that a pilot understands the technology down to the last bolt. But just as the driver of a car doesn't know the cycles of an injector or the exact pressure ratings of a turbocharger, the pilot also "just drives" the plane. He does not have the same level of theoretical knowledge of technology as an engineer.

[@SR-September]

I'm sure he's a pilot like me, a ballerina

[@JoshMaldito-y6q]

Not exactly physics but chemistry.

[@СергейНикольский-я2ц]

@@JoshMaldito-y6qI’d say both

[@maksimluzin1121]

@@JoshMaldito-y6q , Physics by the result (cause), but chemistry, sure, by the process.

[@pjbunnyru]

This is a bench test glider. Su57 combat aircraft have differences and other avionics. For bolts, fuselage coating, etc. - but radars copied wrong parameters of aircraft, this must be taken into account. Nobody knows what is hidden inside, what avionics, what weapons with what parameters a full-fledged aircraft can carry, radar is not on combat aircraft. That is, even you, experts (haha) do not know anything. But everyone in row comes up with something and tries to pretend that aircraft is bad. read comments of people who look at everything not through the prism - only american can be good.

[@aadvert]

I agree, I am also surprised by the arguments of "experts" about the capabilities of the aircraft, seeing it only in flight. It's like talking about the taste of a dish based on its picture.

[@joeblack1052]

But but all the movies said America the best

[@aadvert]

@@joeblack1052 Yes, that's why they talk about a generation raised by Hollywood

[@Juandinggong]

@@pjbunnyru Now you are a Russian bot according to him!!!

[@TylerChamb]

@@aadvert The SU57 focuses on maneuverability, but the US skipped maneuverability and went to focus on long-range stuff, stealth and AI and sensory fusion, because it is not expected that any pilot or jet is going to experience dogfighting in a modern theater. You never get close enough to one of our F22s/35s for that maneuverability to be utilized, because we knock it out of the sky before it ever even knows we are there. If you get close enough to one of our jets to even use that maneuverability, we've already failed at our basic design principle. That's why people clown on the SU-57: first of all you've got like 5 of them while the US has hundreds of F22s/35s, second of all the design of the SU57 doesn't make sense in the modern combat theater because the age of dogfighting is over. Jets/pilots don't ever get close enough to engage in a dogfight anymore, so all that hypermaneuverable 3-d thrust vectoring is a bit of a waste. We could make a jet with hypermaneuverability too- we did in the 90s with a modified F18, but we understood even back then that this tech was a dead end and we went straight to stealth, AI, and sensor fusion.

[@kylekyle5438]

The author of the video mentioned how skeptical he was of dogging missiles with maneuvers and how you can’t see them and “good luck trying to dodge them”. There is audio of an SU-34 dodging multiple Patriot missiles and he even mentions seeing the missiles, his wingman or AWACS was even tracking the missile warning the SU-34 pilot. He successfully defeated the missiles and one actually exploded very close to the aircraft. There is also F-16 HUD footage where the F-16 was dodging missiles as well. In regards to maneuverability, people forget the SU-57 has 360 degree radar coverage and high off bore missiles. The fact is that this aircraft does not need to do crazy maneuvering in order to launch a missile as one of the radar(s) will provide a weapons lock even if the aircraft is not pointing towards the threat. The S-70 Okhonik drone is also meant to compliment the SU-57 and it’s should have a much smaller RCS, in theory the SU-57 would never need to engage as the S-70 would do that first. Therefore, the S-70 and AWACS can feed the SU-57 information through datalink or even help jam enemy aircraft. As much as westerners like to sh!t on the SU-57, it has capabilities not yet found on any other aircraft such as its full radar coverage, a versatile heavy long range stealth drone that it uses as a wingman, it also comes with long range stealth cruise and stealth loitering munitions, it has excellent range, payload, maneuverability and by all accounts a very good spectrum of avionics, everything from IRST to MAWS and everything in between. One SU-57 was operating deep in Ukrainian airspace when it shot down an S-70 that lost communications? What is interesting is that both aircraft were operating at high altitude and in the middle of the day while facing threats from Patriots, S-300s, NASAMs, F-16s, SU-27s, MiG-29s and many ground based radars and potentially NATO drones and AWACS. This shows that both aircraft have a small enough RCS to evade the best NATO and Soviet air defenses and radars.

[@AshleyRiot-lf8dw]

Russia does not have an Airborne Warning And Control System and the video is fake, because in principle there cannot be a wingman, NATO has a network-centric system that includes AWACS aircraft, satellite reconnaissance and all combat units, the Russian Federation has an antediluvian system where the aircraft is on its own, no one accompanies him.

[@A_Nice_Guy.]

@AshleyRiot-lf8dw they literally have A-50 and have been doing network centric coordination with aircraft since MiG-31, bruh.

[@AshleyRiot-lf8dw]

@@A_Nice_Guy. This plane is fake. Two A-50s were shot down by the Patriot system last year. The A-50 didn't even know that missiles were flying at it. And the A-50 has not been modernized since the 1980s; the only modernized one has the letter U, which is located in Moscow. So there is no network centric system.

[@AshleyRiot-lf8dw]

@@A_Nice_Guy. There are still five A-50 reconnaissance aircraft left in Russia. They can carry out missions, however, after the shooting down of the second aircraft of this type by the Ukrainian Defense Forces, the enemy does not fly them near Ukraine. According to the latest data, A-50U is located in the Moscow region, 2 in Engels and 2 in the area close to the Ukrainian borders. 2 AWACS aircraft is the same as if they don’t exist. Since it has a detection range of low-flying targets of 300 km and this is the advanced one.

[@aleksandrs1422]

To be fair, that SU-34 didn't "dodge" incoming missiles using a cobra. Maneurobility can still get you out of harm's way faster if a BVR missile engages you though, this is true. It matters how fast you are executing turns, though it's not just about maneurobility, but also energy

[@mirekslechta7161]

Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be , USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.

[@moharezkimohand765]

Bravo pour cette vérité que beaucoup malheureusement refusent d'admettre.

[@МихаилЗахаров-г8я]

Все что Вы написали Правда

[@jordank2028]

Cute story. Russian army is so great they recruited North Koreans. Laughable. Russia has lost far more people in this war than the US did in 20 years in Afghanistan. That's crazy. But yeah, Russia is just so much more advanced than West. Amazing navy they got too😂

[@moharezkimohand765]

Nous ne sommes pas en match de sport pour relever le score des équipes ; sortons vite de ces raisonnements d'adolescents ; c'est bien des humains qui s'entre​tuent ; alors cherchons les raisons en tant que adulte éveillé pour arriver à la paix. Sachez une chose , l'esprit de guerre est nuisible à l'humanité. @@jordank2028

[@mirekslechta7161]

@@jordank2028 First: Russia´s loses are "counted" by Ukraine.... Makes no sence to comment it even more ... Second: Learn about Russia - North Korea military treaty and realize that this "help" is simply simbolic anyway :) Third: Learn somewhere else about Russia than from your main stream media otherwise you will learn nothing but lies Good bye.

[@thisisafact9181]

I am certified Russian bot. Thank you very much 😎

[@chidigit]

You discredit your content by calling ordinary and intellectually cautious people Russian bots. This kind of mental laziness is unwelcomed and repulsive. We the people can think for ourselves. Keep your political beliefs to yourself and simply speak to facts. We can all learn from each other, be you Chinese, Indian, Russian, American, German etc. Arrogance destroys

[@Juandinggong]

@@chidigit Him calling people who didn’t agree with him Bots really irritated me!

[@marinblaze]

Based comment

[@rdengin]

The poopy cowboy kinda joking

[@bmsk0076]

Salty American pilots trying to disparage the Su 57 is amusing to watch!🤣

[@pjbunnyru]

only America, the rest are worthless. 🤷‍♂️😂😂😂I've seen so many videos of pilots on Su57, everyone says that Su57 is bad. Most interesting thing is that they believe that only America can do good, rest are losers😂😂

[@avimaltzman5673]

Keyboard fighter? Did you ever seat in a cockpit? let alone piloting an aircraft in combat.? SU-57 is 40 years behind those. Long short: typical Russian Potyomkin village. How does it help to operate against the Western A2 / AD? this Potyomkin piece will be downed before its pilot could say "Yob Tvoyu Mat". Wanna see aerobatics, I can show you one in my Pitts. In the 80s and early 90s high alpha maneuvers would be somehow relevant. But today it's like trying to show off air contortionism in face of 20 - 30 g missile from 20 - 80 miles away, not to mention the energy loss. Remind me what all this gymnastics is good for? Gen. 5 is about Stealth, Electronic warfare and platform collaboration.

[@eugenes2614]

​@@avimaltzman5673Ты везде что ли высрался, болезный? Потёмкин вилэдж, блять )))

[@СергейДемон-м1э]

​@@avimaltzman5673😅 наивный..

[@jcarvalho1500]

You are a russian bot because of that comment 😂😂

[@foshizzlfizzl]

By the way, the pilot is Sergei Bogdan, a very experienced and decorated man. He helped developing the Su-57, and he's flying this jet for years. It's not just a airshow pilot. I'd love to see how hard it is to transfer this skills to other Su-57 pilots, because everyone will fly it as safe as possible, like it always is, with those expensive machines.

[@xaviMendivil]

Im fckn impressed by the jet and even more with a 65 year old pilot 😮

[@WChocoleta]

The Su-57 is so acrobatic, but it's Sergey Bogdan's unmatched skills that took this plane to the next level.

[@Wacko2-wrx]

Irrespective of which country the plane and pilot came from, from a spectator’s perspective it was special. Couldn’t care less what it can and can’t do in combat, that pilot had lots of experience, skill and did stuff you don’t see often so other than that who cares.

[@obj4298]

Best fighter, simple. For the 5th generation airframe to take these stresses is SIMPLY unreal! To think these evasive can't be done in a dog fight, coming from a pro.....IS LAUGHABLE! Question; which missile or plane can react to that? Answer; none!

[@TAmateurGuy]

Can't be more than 9Gs, for pilot's sake. You should be worried about long range threats more than dogfights that really don't happen in modern air combat. Modern Air-to-Air missiles can pull upto 35Gs, that's way more than any airframe can take. I am not American, I don't care which airplane is best, but I don't think maneuverability is that important in modern combat. What is important is actually classified so we can't tell how good SU-57 really is. Might be the best 5th-gen (doubtful), or the worse. Nobody without classified clearance knows.

[@MaboloLibwese]

The Su57, according Borzzikman, who has an extremely high level of reliability, in the information he disseminates, has 40 air to air kills in the Ukraine war, from such ranges as 350km, with its R37M air to air hypersonic weapon. All other stealth aircraft in the world have 0.

[@roman335i]

NO ! F22 does, a chinese balloon

[@IsaacMuntz]

​@@roman335i😂😂😂😂😂

[@ИваЛазави]

Author you will be extremely surprised to learn that in Russia people are extremely interested in other people's professional opinion of foreigners. Or better yet, go to Moscow, talk to people on the streets, and you will immediately understand that you are not being written by bots from Russia, but by ordinary people. It's even a little disrespectful to its target audience. We from Russia sincerely look at you, and you talk about us like this))

[@chidigit]

It is disgusting for lack of a better word. There is alot of intellectual shallowness in the west, I suspect borne out of arrogance. You find people who are considered smart falling for unconscious political bias. It truly is sad to see and one of the many signs of a declining empire.

[@nurunnahar928]

Nah bro , america is sht now

[@Cars-N-Jets]

Yeah Rain knows that he has met the pilot its not directed at everyone from Russia just the bots. I respect Russians and other people from different countries that are an adversary to the U.S but not the people in government 🇺🇸🫱🏻‍🫲🏻🇷🇺

[@endofunk2174]

That was not a Su-57. It was a T50-4 prototype that is used strictly for flight demonstrations; it excludes Su-57 features like stealth, Su-57 engine upgrades, etc.

[@tarkus07]

I've never seen such a short takeoff run... I think this plane would be able to take off from an aircraft carrier without the need for a catapult. Simply amazing.

[@MaboloLibwese]

Tell me what you would against his R37M missile, which has a range of 250 miles, and goes at Mach 6

[@bee4pcgoldrule.007]

Only Russia flys like that .

[@avimaltzman5673]

Indeed. Only Russians... :) Great from afar, far from great. Potyomkin piece. this thing lags the Western tech by at least 25 years. Check A2 / AD capabilities.

[@РоманКомолов-е3б]

@@avimaltzman5673 Клоун, ты кто? Очередной обиженка?

[@Evgen_from_Sokolovo]

@@avimaltzman5673 , нельзя же быть таким болваном, и каждым своим комментарием это подтверждать. Вся выдуманная фейковость Потёмкинских деревень заключается в том, что западные клоуны, вроде тебя, не смогли понять, как за такой короткий срок, всё это было построено. А раз не поняли, значит это не существует. - Видишь суслика? - И я нет - а он есть. Но ты можешь продолжать и дальше выставлять себя идиотом.

[@baracke]

Bro fell in love watching that. That was adorable.

[@artiartibald9431]

The Russians have the best and most unpretentious equipment and it is designed for war

[@ufereokeaso5560]

Man struggling not to be a classical American, finding faults with anything and everything not American. Man grow up and be real especially in a world where people are increasingly leaving the u.s behind.

[@kirabowilliam]

You must be regretting making this video.

[@Juandinggong]

@@kirabowilliam i think comments section tore him a new one lol

[@goodbonezz1289]

This jet is phenomenal.

[@tonyhero1628]

Some good points??😂?? This SU 57 beats anything in US hollywood BS

[@jgy4iydoshik]

what the Su 57 and Vaz 2109 have in common is the whistle of the alternator belt)

[@naveedrajab5601]

Envious clowns. Russian pilots are masters..these are are the real deal..not movies.

[@alexs.4340]

Russians are clowns. 18th century mindset.

[@SvetlanaTeslya]

After the phrase about Russian bots, I did not look at it. You're a bot yourself!!😈

[@justingaskins3440]

Im american and love russian su designs, and su57 is my favorite. As a aviation enthusiasts some people cant just enjoy a demo. ALSO THE PILOT IS LIKE 50 YEARS OLD! PRETTY DOPE

[@DmitryVis]

Привет, пилоту 62 годика 😅

[@GenaMatogen]

Greetings from russian dot...

[@Maskva1825]

The enhanced maneuverability doesn’t only provide advantage in a dogfight, but also when evading missiles!

[@spiritualevolvedlightbeing8597]

Very interesting to watch a pilot Analysis of a other pilot

[@igorvasin6960]

The 'falling leaf' as you called it helps to get lost on the enemy's radar. and the smoke is due to a sharp change in the operating mode of the engine, when fuel is injected but little air flows in and the fuel burns out with smoke.

[@aleksandrs1422]

Maneurobility is more important that people think. Most of all, if we're ever unlucky enough to test stealth jets against stealth jets, it might turn out to be even more important. For example, stealth of a fighter is not a number value, but actually depends on the aspect. It's a sphere of values. Actually, mulpiple spheres for each of the infinte number of possible radar wavelengths. Usually the jet is most stealthy from the front. That's why in a dynamic battlefield if your EW support units detect for example an enemy AWACS jet, which can happen any second, it might matter a lot if you spend a few secods less to turn your nose towards the emission source. And it would matter even more if you're not moving the surfaces too much, but use minimal surfaces and maximum thrust vectoring to execute the turn. And it seems that Su-57 has automatic radar stealth management mode where some parts of the surfaces that move during dogfight can be fixed for minimal observability during BVR fight. Not to mention it has those L-band radars that can detect the general direction of even stealthy targets. Probably not enough to launch weapons, but enough to notice a possible ambush and turn to face it, maximizing stealth to get the first launch. And of course, stealth-on-stealth fight is more likely to turn into a short range engagement, where being agile matters. These things are theories that will only be tested in real combat, may we never know who's right.

[@PedjoGT]

Jelous man

[@mg8718]

Its a fantastic war plane and thats all theres to it.

[@ПетрПетрович777]

А какая ракета у стран НАТО набирает скорость до 4 махов? Что-то я про такую не слышал. Но факт в том, что СУ 35 ушёл сразу от трёх выпущенных ракет от так называемого "лучшего в мире ПВО" "Пэтриот". Хватит себя переоценивать. Смешно смотритесь, и только лишь разочаровываете, ведь раньше мы считали, что в США живут не очень глупые люди.

[@mab2187]

Not a bot, not even Russian. Its just a cool thing to think about, I mean the Raptor is cool and all but its been like shoved down our face for decades. Its nice breath of fresh air to see something else to potentially rival. All these post stall maneuvers is useful for dogfights if the enemy on your six doesn't manage themselves, furthermore its useful to do PSM for missile dogfights in conjunction with HMS. To say the PSM are worthless is like saying a fighter should not have a gun in this era. Sure its a limited thing but you still need a gun, so you still need super maneuverability.

[@556m4]

Man. Why do the Russians get so emotional when people say stuff about their weapons ? Why is it such a soft spot for you guys ? The tears in this comment section is almost unbelievable and coming from grown men too ? Ugh.

[@xaviMendivil]

😂 Americans scared to invade Russia they only invade por 3; world countrys

[@556m4]

@ Are you 12 years old ? What kind of comment is that ? Grow up and talk like an adult.

[@Cars-N-Jets]

That intro is amazing😂

[@clemo254]

Wonderful narration. You made me understand the various maneuvers by translating them into "common language" for someone like me who is a non-aviation expert. I now feel better equipped to understand and appreciate these maneuvers, at least to a certain extent.

[@chisomahamba379]

Why are you in pains lol 😆, it hurts you that Russia 🇷🇺 can also creat powerful and magnificent jets 🤔😆.

[@kashifpeterify]

AL51 engine

[@alsm974]

That was not Su-57. That was old T-50 in China.

[@victorparks5378]

Not sure if this is that much advantage in a real dogfight, but the Russian pilots have the airshow theatrics all to themselves. The F22 and F35 cannot compare ...NATO cannot compare with Russian airshow performances, Period!

[@ismailraja8734]

I think pilot is showing maneuverability or he is dancing in the air. Not showing Dog Fight

[@iain8837]

A close in dogfight 1v1 is such an extremely rare event in modern combat. If it were to happen, it means there was a major failure of one of the many systems in place to prevent it. This aircraft is part of a system which lacks in many ways and is completely unproven, such as pilot training, pilot flying hours, pilots available, multi task force training, aircraft reliability, systems software and reliability, avionics, cost, interoperability, MTBF, MTTR, spares availability etc etc etc, actually stealth capability. None of these are on show here at the display. What’s on show is thrust vectoring and a nice paint job.

[@Alzav-w3t]

This means that two invisible beings collided and they were unable to recognize each other at a great distance, so they entered into close combat.

[@denisalvarado9991]

Hopefully it never happens, we have to choose leaders that never allow this to happen 👍

[@loserswife7720]

Never seen bigger crap than this this su-57

[@g.o.soccer5661]

An ace pilot from Turkey, who has tested both the F-35 and the Su-35, stated that the Su-35 outperforms the F-35 in terms of agility, performance precision, and long-range radar capabilities. He recommended that his government consider purchasing the Su-35. However, he noted that the Su-57 is a next-level advancement compared to the Su-35.

[@OutlawPingu]

That take off really impressive.

[@IsaacMuntz]

Something to note: This is the pak t50 older prototype not the production su57 which has completely different characteristics

[@wisemansstory2235]

The amount of discussion about su 57 fighters automatically prove that su 57 is best

[@strizhi6717]

T-50 and Su-57 is like Yf-22 and F-22

[@ttumpy]

Do i hear some Jealousy here, Give the man his props he is damn Good it's Symphony in the sky, It seem as thoe every time he does a maneuver you cannot you say I dont know..

[@mamdouh-Tawadros]

For the smoky jet motors, they add liquid nitrogen to the exhaust, so infrared signature becomes much less. But it causes dark smoke.

[@FireTheHoker]

Can an f22 or f35 fly like that, can they match the speed or range, do they carry as many and as deadly weapons with extreme range of engagement ? I think not.

[@vovasRomas]

F22 is so secret, no one seen it in actual combat and F35 after 2 trillions spent can't even fly straight

[@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я]

speed is the same as F22, but SU-57 will get new engines after 2025, so it will be faster

[@FireTheHoker]

@@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я You're wrong it's already faster.

[@gypsyjoker30]

F35 can not manauvere like that f35 just hopes it doesn't get to the merge against a flanker or su57 the f22 is very manuverable and capable but I don't think it would be as manuvarable as a su30 or a su57 even a su35 could probably out match a f22 in a dogfight

[@MaboloLibwese]

@@СерхиоБускетс-ф7я No. They have started installing the AL51F1 engines this year. Some Su57are already flying with them

[@treymorris8096]

Lolol the US good at Hollywood

[@mikeck4609]

People think you could use these maneuvers to dodge a missile? Damn Movies aren’t real. Too much top gun where every missile can be fooled with counter measures until you run out of counter measures.

[@eu3127]

So a not manouvrable jet is better?😂

[@Tommy-zs6ro]

Thats a 15 year old t-50 prototype platform not a production su57, HUGE difference

[@Cars-N-Jets]

Rain knows that.

[@arseniy_viktorovich]

3:05 But we've seen Su-34 doing that regularly, even though its tough for them to do.

[@nakotaapache4674]

in this video at 0:16 the big screen shot you can see the thrust tubes moving, also in the last video there was one or two moments who this can be seen.

[@stalintheliberator2454]

American bot low rated video somehow in my recommendations))

[@eddiedankie]

If American jets are so great kindly invite russia and china to airshow competitions and vice versa 😂😂😂

[@darkfiles2274]

Зум камеры слишком большой, на расстоянии смотрится очень впечатляющие.

[@MaboloLibwese]

What do you know about Pyotr Ufimsov?

[@victorzvyagintsev1325]

There is a video where he was flying on an overcast day. No cobra stuff, just very tight loops around the airport.....might be more telling about manuverablity than this video.

[@zrikizrikic9126]

Ofc you can dodge impact missiles with manouver..heck even F16 did some .heck you can see even k52 with IC maims do manovour and dodge missile..but usually there are 2missilles shot ..or was like that in old days .is it solid defence? Like gliding on razor snd brake with balls..

[@kochevnik88]

Сколько раз, этот американец участвовал в бою, настоящем ??? 🧐

[@vasyaweissmann9455]

Air shows only show how planes fly. The Su-57 flies well. All other characteristics are no longer suitable for an air show.

[@Tortilla8886]

SU-57 #1 best aircraft ever!

[@MaboloLibwese]

Why are you making so many videos of someone's plane

[@3dmax911]

as always great analysing !! unbiased as always !! would like to see you give some DCS vids tutorials about the Viper if you are into DCS

[@АлександрРедькин-к1ш]

Это не стартовая модель, не прототип, не образец. Это уже серийный экземпляр. Данной серии су57 уже участвовали в боевых действиях в Сирии, сейчас участвуют в СВО на Украине. Прототипы модернизированной версии вам ещё не показали. Так что, не вводите людей в заблуждение.

[@reivinzon-tp7jc]

It's an air show not a combat. Since Su-57 got the supermaneuverability it has to show off. Otherwise it will just do the basic F16 maneuvers.

[@BenVaserlan]

It also has dorsal and ventral DIRCM turrets so good luck trying to beat a Su-57 in a dogfight.

[@Delinka3D]

T50; Codename: Humble pie 😅

[@Grom0zeka]

The engines are smokey only when reheat turned on or off.

[@aural_supremacy]

Not the SU-57 it is the prototype everyone knows that

[@СергейМестечко-ю8к]

,, ДА , ДА ,ДА ...ТОЛЬКО ВЫ , ТОЛЬКО ВЫ ,,АМЕРИКАНЦЫ,, - ,,ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНЫЕ ,, ,...поэтому весь мир начинает вас ,,исключать,, из своего круга общения !!!

[@aleksandrs1422]

What are those comments lol. Author seems impartial and respectful and actually seems to have nothing but praise for the jet As a Russian, I choose to think those are CIA/NSA bots trying to irk the creator 😂

[@PeterGorvitz]

Yes, I understand why he’s calling them bots - the comments don’t seem to make sense: he is praising the plane, pretty strongly.

[@roman335i]

maybe you should teach your former colleague, Moover something

[@Juandinggong]

@@roman335i i have been watching mover for a while and they are extremely ignorant. They literally make a reaction video without doing any homework just spit balling as they go! I had to quit watching them. Especially after their reaction video of patriots and SU-34 intercept.

[@alexs.4340]

@@Juandinggong and you have a type rating on which aircraft to say Mover is ignorant? PPL-A? PPL-H?

[@leonardobastos1945]

Top Gun Manouver...

[@ROBOTRIX_eu]