Royal Marine Reacts To Su-57: Russia's Stealth Fighter Competing with US F-22 and F-35

[@_plasticarmor_8789]

A couple of Su-57 aircraft, turning on the turning on electronic warfare flew near the US base somewhere in Europe, the air defense system could not notice them, in order to show their presence, the pilots deliberately turned off the electronic warfare system, which the ground services were shocked...and later they complained to the Russian Foreign Ministry that the Russian pilots behaved brazenly, thereby shaming the air defense systems of NATO and the United States

[@johnsheffield3168]

Russians quiver in the presence of the US military. Lies and propaganda are all you have. The Su-57 is a beautiful plane with mediocre capabilities, and since the Russian economy is in a death spin, thanks to your insane leader Putin, Russia will never be able to put the Felon into mass production. Even if it could, the Felon would be blown out of the sky before it ever saw an F-35 or an F-22. I wonder what it’s like living in a country that is so greatly outclassed by the United States?

[@Надежда-к9б8п]

Заслужили, и благодарите своего бога,что все на месте осталось,спасибо ВВП не забудьте сказать

[@juansanchez9343]

Russia is wining in Ukraine even though is fighting against all NATO . 40 against 1

[@williamballard9173]

Then how come Russia has not occupied the capital and is still in the eastern and south of the country fighting a WW1 style battle? What's going on in Ukraine had changed warfare forever with WWI tactics and modern technologies. Russia will never concur all of Ukraine. Even if by some magic they enter the capital, they will deal with an insurrection until they leave the country. I would think countries would learn by history. Russia is in a no win situation.

[@manongpilo1394]

Stupid they are not fighting NATO , they only fight with Ukraine , NATO only supports gun and ammo ,

[@Macomio80]

You mean they fight Ukraine and a mixture of retired NATO equipment! 😂😂

[@juansanchez9343]

@@Macomio80 Did you saw how the Russians evaporated the supposedly French soldiers that were experts💀🎃

[@jeremymerkt3982]

The difference is satellite. If Russia didn’t have satellites, Europe would have already done them in like we did Iraq. If the shit really hits the fan,you will see the sky filled with fireballs streaking across the night sky. Remember there was a good 15 year period where Russia was the US ticket to space. Their program is still running infinitely better than NASA’s SLS which is a money pit disaster.

[@davidjager8137]

When the Serbs shot down the f117 in 1999, they said, sorry, but we didn't know it was invisible. They shot it down with a system that was produced in 1961, the S125 NEVA system.

[@aleksas3058]

Zato nam se Amerika i danas sveti,otimajuc Kosovo iz sastava Srbije.Ko zna koliko su pukli novca na F 117?Ko zna koliko im je ugovora odjavljeno za prodaju istog?Ali sigurno se zna da su vitalni djelovi zavrsili u Kini.Od tada krece razvoj stelta u kineskoj ratnoj avijaciji.Zato su im amerikanci i bombardovali ambasadu u Beogradu.

[@МишоПепић]

Tako je mi srbi smo jako ljubazni i miroljubiv narod kada smo oborili nevidljivi 117 javno smo se izvinuli nato fašistima jer nismo znali da je nevidljiv 😂

[@davidjager8137]

@@МишоПепић pa kad uvjek nesto lupetaju ovi zapadnjaki, morao sam nesto da jim kazem, jer tako🤣

[@combatvet1307]

When the F-117 bomb doors are open, it loses its stealth capabilities...also it had been flying since 1981.

[@almightymanshadow1002]

@@combatvet1307 still got shot down with 20 year older anti air , now imagine 20 year more advanced anti air than f22. Stealth is most overrated shit , westerns only know to talk about stealth when it comes to planes

[@mauroschiff]

For your information, Russia is a liberal country, only the energy and arms sectors are nationalized. It is thanks to this that a liter of gasoline costs 0.50cts and a 152mm shell costs $600 yours 155mm 6000$ an f35 100,000,000 and a su 57 37,000,000 too much corruption. your manufacturers do not compete in reality it is a cartel which shares the contracts

[@n.muelder]

Ahh that must be why russia is ranked as one of the most corrupt countrys in the world.

[@verilyze]

Well that's has its own benefit and flaws American manufacurer has better innovation than russian And higher profits keep them motivated to better and the down side is these kind of people are individualist they don't care about their country at all only them Benifit their things are related to their reputation and most likely what ever they make is as advanced as it gets and advanced things takes time to get perfected all the system in f35 are new it will years when they will get to decent stage Your benifit is that you own the design but we all know how government organisation works Slow efficient but outdated Once F35 is decent what do you think your goverment based jets would be able to do F35 is not gonna engage you in dogfights likely hit and run Can Russia win maybe Because of your soldiers It's a fact us soldiers are not tough as russian soldiers why more harsh terrain and less relying on tech This makes your army tougher than the US counter parts Due their dependency on tech

[@Bioruss]

@@verilyze Talking about that innovation it is really a beacon of light when 29% of those innovative paper weights that they call the F35 are able to fly. That's not me saying that but about a couple weeks ago Matt gates confronted the US military's general about this situation and called the F35 "really expensive paper weights" himself. Really innovative if you ask me.

[@verilyze]

@@Bioruss those which can fly kick russians ass sorry if I had to bet Russia and us i would pick Russia but in tech you ain't winning If the f35s gonna go down most likely it will be a technical failure not russian missile You can tolerate a f35 until it breaks there is no way you can win on US with tech itself Your tech literacy is very bad You are tough country but with bad technology You gonna lose serious force and won't be able to down a single f35 other than that you would pretty much win

[@rafaelm2566]

A 155mm shell for the M777 costs from $230 to $1200 A liter of gasoline is $1. and this is not because of corruption. For example, a steelmaker in Russia receives from $200 to $300 for an 8-hour, 5-day week of work. In the USA, a steelworker earns $75 per hour. That's $3,000 a week with the same workload. Aircraft design engineer in Russia $350, in the USA $2400 And so in all areas. It is impossible to keep the price of a plane at 37 million if you pay your employees 10 times more.

[@garyburkhardt8874]

Do you know which country had developed the thrust vectoring system? It was developed by the USSR and plans were sold to the US when Russia at that time was going bankrupt. So, the Russians have been ahead in innovation. The only thing holding them back was making money to do the things they would like to do.

[@joeblowe4630]

Which country developed the nuclear bomb? US... you will be humbled one day Russia. Keep it up

[@mitsanut5869]

​@@joeblowe4630the bomb was made in US but by Germans. Don't beat your chest so fast, punk. Russians build their own stuff, and they are really good at it. Cry me a river, Hill Billy.

[@Theosound111]

Which country has the largest nuclear arsenal,keep talking

[@BorisCode]

@@joeblowe4630 If the US was able to survive after a nuclear strike on the civilian population of Japan, this does not mean that it will be able to survive after a nuclear strike on Russia. These are slightly different conditions

[@juryfilatov4520]

​@@joeblowe4630not true. The first nuclear bomb was created in Germany. but they did not have time to test it. the test site was captured and the equipment was taken to the USA along with engineers, scientists and other Nazis

[@cokrlicix]

F-35 is crap, how many lost by now without a fight? SU-57 is 2 times bigger, better armed, faster and more maneuverable. Russians also have missiles of much longer range then any western aircraft, up to 400km while western max range is 200km. And you are right about MIG-25 but he was fallowed by MIG-31 that broke many records, and does not even have western counterpart, not to mention the SU-27 that just humiliated western competition of that time. And in UA their is no need for that type of aircraft, UA air force has been destroyed, SU-34s and 25s are doing most of the job from the sky and MIG-31 occasionally firing Kinhzal hypersonic missiles.

[@yomama629]

2 of the 20 Su-57 airframes built have crashed, which is a 10x higher rate of failure than the F-35, and that's without even factoring in the infinitely larger amount of flight hours the F-35 has had compared to the Su-57. Your entire argument is bullshit, an F-35 pilot could destroy a Su-57 with his eyes closed. Go drink some vodka Ivan

[@kivarum]

Миг31 настолько крут, что у него нет даже российских аналогов.

[@cokrlicix]

@@kivarum Правда.

[@сергейкоровин-ч7ш]

😂😂😂​@@kivarum

[@joeblowe4300]

YOU HAVE 11 OF THEM. Hahahahaha Russia cancelled the project because nobody wanted to buy them!!

[@igorvasin6960]

and I also want to add that the Ukrainians themselves shared videos they filmed of a Su-57 attacking targets in Ukraine, but the most interesting thing is that American radars were never able to detect it!!!

[@alligator99noma18]

А можно ссылки на эти видео, если не сложно? Очень интересно было-бы взглянуть

[@AleksHawk]

Ну ради справедливости на Украине не весь спектр западных систем обнаружения, не один современный истребитель пятого поколения не сможет быть незамеченным в любой крупной державе

[@torides.]

as far as i know, russia only uses su-57's for cruise missile strikes, which the su-57 fires the cruise missiles atleast 200km+ away the frontlines(or the border) so they can't film it. and on these cruise missile strikes the aircraft needs to be fast and very high, so its impossible to detect by camera's or human eye

[@thulanishage418]

As for questions asked , they also apply on the F22 and the unswers also uncertain. The f22 has never been used against formidable air defense systems ever no one knows how it perform

[@igorvasin6960]

@@alligator99noma18 я несколько раз размещал тебе ссылку но ютуб её удаляет . поищи в поисковике : "су-57 над украиной" там много где этот ролик есть или на странице "лампа знаний" в ютубе есть видео за прошлый год .

[@Čangrizavi_Cinik]

Soviet way was to make highly specialised budget plane. Americans loved to burn money and create planes for everything with everything. Soviets never had so much money and their planes are made for defense.

[@АндрейМануйлов-ы7в]

Не пори чушь

[@Ильнур-ы1е]

​@@АндрейМануйлов-ы7вне обращай внимания на него. Он же просто американский мальчик

[@aygero]

Maybe on the contrary, the Russians tried to make planes multitasking because there was not much money, but the Americans made a separate plane for each task?

[@aa11ff]

You mean usa printing money lets see when they start gold oil gas to pay in other money end dolar gonna be just toalet paper

[@Maga5602]

The USA created planes for show-offs, and the USSR for real battles

[@mphomosoeu6624]

My friend, please 🙏 don't confuse the Soviet Union with Russia. They are 2 different things. I don't understand why most of u Westerners do that, we Africans and the rest of the world don't do that

[@walterbeyer4949]

Im Kalten Krieg sagten die Wessis zur UdSSR die Russen. Und jetzt sind Russen für diese Gscheiten Wessis Sowjetunion. Das tun die Wessis aus Respektlosigkeit! Der Wessi ist eben der Übermensch und die Größten.

[@egv1557]

They are the silly, most brainwashed people on the planet.

[@djokicadjokic6375]

They're doing that and they will always do that, because they are looking at Slavic people as a lower rase or something, as well as a African nations. They want to destroy Slavs because of values we're promoting as well as our religion. We are the similar about that with African people and they don't like that kind of values. They don't like our Ortodox religion because it also promote only good things and family in the center of society. And at the end they want Russian oil and gas supplies and reseves. That's the reason they are calling African nation as a third row nations. They're promoting some satanic values.

[@lianobarbosa8438]

They very dumb

[@wheelsdeal]

I mean...they knew from 1498 that this was not India and still to this day they call native Americans...Indians. Go figure.

[@МихаилГладилкин-з1з]

Ф-117 был сбит старой системой ПВО СССР. Страшно подумать какие самолёты США способна сбить система С-400! Россия сила!

[@0069yj]

Thats a real test for stealth...😂😂😂

[@jasonlim7427]

Russia is only strong on paper. Ukraine war showed their weakness and failures. 😆🤣

[@savchik_12]

@@jasonlim7427 ???

[@Ustiyan]

@@jasonlim7427 NATO countries have invested 260 billion euros in Ukraine. Russia is winning. 😁

[@jasonlim7427]

@@Ustiyan if russia's winning we wouldn't be having these conversation. The war is far from over it could take russia 20 years to win it. I wonder how long it would take before the people realizes its a loss cause. LOL. Its the same thing happened to america in iraq but with well armed and more losses to your mother russia. Its funny actually. It really showed how weak your country is.

[@gustavoruiz6611]

This guy doesn't seem to know anything about fighters at all. "This is a big aircraft", duh.

[@sadestmage]

I mean most of "experts" like this They somehow related to military, but absolutely not to the thing they are "experts" of Previously seen Navy officer voicing his expert opinion on ground battle

[@jimmy7144]

It's because great Britian no longer has a military

[@zubi9995]

you've built a "stealth" aircraft the size of a fucking strategic bomber, it's not big, it's huge

[@endofunk2174]

The western proxy war in Ukraine against Russia has proven the west have a huge problem because of their private military contractors; that being that they can't complete against Russia and similarly China when it compares to production. Russia's strategy is Ukraine has seen the west empty their munitions coffers and be unable to compete with Russia's sustained rate of fire. The extremely long durations to replenish western munition stocks says it all. Secondly nothing the western has put forward against Russia has been a game changer; Russia was able to neutralise any perceived advantage quickly with its electronic warfare systems. The west would lose in a war with Russia, and that doesn't even consider the nuclear munitions; against the combined forces of Russia and China, the west will be destroyed, because there is no way they could ever match the combined production of both Russia and China..

[@EugenedeLange-f4l]

You really don't know anything about the SU-57 and yet you put up a video supposedly analyzing it.

[@biswajit707]

He was not analyzing, he was reacting about the facts of SU-57.

[@dicksonlema6725]

True that

[@mirekslechta7161]

Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be , USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.

[@DM014]

Очень глупо сравнивать, пытаться выяснить что лучше Су-57 или F-22. Почему глупо? Да потому, что это машины разных концепций с разным техническим заданием. Это не конкурс, и уж простите, но стерильных дуэльных боёв этих самолётов в реальной жизни не будет. А на поле боя всё зависит от множества факторов. Письками мериться глупо. Для адептов сверхнизкого показателя малозаметности F-22 хочу сказать только одно, включите голову и хоть немного погрузитесь в тему. Есть профильные статьи и целые учебники по радиотехнике, селекции, волнам и т.д. Супер оружия не существует, любую технику можно уничтожить, вывести из строя и даже сделать так, что она полностью потеряет актуальность. Такова жизнь.

[@2mark4u]

facts

[@СамсонСамсонов-к8я]

Полностью поддерживаю 👍

[@Rusich945]

su57 engineers stated that the average of rcs su57 = rcs f22 = 0.3. The Russians made a copy of f22, and measured rcs at all irradiation angles. The su57 is lighter than the f22 and has more powerful engines. it has 6 radars. two of them are UHF radars. the main radar has more power. and detects f15 at a range of 400 kilometers (200 miles). A next-generation experimental microwave radar based on the principles of photonics has already been developed. The Su57 arsenal includes an air-to-air missile with a range of 400 kilometers. against AWACS. Su57 is equipped with a laser defense system. it blinds the infrared missile guidance heads... in the future, it is possible to increase the power of lasers for destroying missiles. Su57 can fight, take off and return to base without a pilot. a Su57 pilot can pilot up to 4 S-70 drones; he carries up to 6 missiles with a range of 200 kilometers, or 4 missiles with a range of up to 400 kilometers. the pilot can use ground-based air defense radars. All these capabilities of the Su57 place it in the 6th generation. Russophobes may not believe it, but this will not reduce the outstanding characteristics of the Su57

[@phamxuankhang1847]

Bình luận HAY. Tôi đến từ Việt Nam

[@alexeyguskov8153]

Насколько я шерстил информацию у Ф22 кросс секция от (0.022 в лоб под 90 градусов и точно в кабину при свежей краске), до 0.8. Су57 от 0.5 до 1. Другими словами Ф22 такой же стелс, как и СУ57. Просто Америкосы любят говорить только о 0.022, что достигается исключительно в лабораторных тестах.

[@adjinaabrekov]

Your fighters are only good in the movies, and the Russians are battle-tested.

[@Socal760-in7dz]

Do you remember what happened in Syria in 2018 at the oil field?

[@Ecroartu]

@@Socal760-in7dz i remember when US airforce was crying about "inferior" in their opinion russian jets harrasing them by flying too close tho.

[@Socal760-in7dz]

@@Ecroartu you are not answering my question... what happened?

[@krc306]

@@Socal760-in7dz Do you remember what happened in Mariupol, Avdeevka, Bahkmut?

[@Socal760-in7dz]

@@krc306 I'm talking about American and russian men fighting it seems like you guys don't have the balls to answer my question

[@dimon77112]

твой F 35 всего лишь копия советского як 141, живи теперь с этим)

[@mythical_4275]

I can't seem to remember only 2 f-35 being built and one of them crashing on a flight deck. Oh wait that was the yak 141 that was made to inferior to the harrier

[@DenisShell]

@@mythical_4275 су57 летает на сверхзвуке без включения форсажа. живи теперь с этим.

[@moiGospodin-kp6sn]

​@@mythical_4275The Harier was much worse than the Yak 141, otherwise the f 35 would have had a system from the Harier and not from the Yak 141.

[@SCMoviee]

I see a view week ago, so many problem with America's jet, like F35 Korea and Australia. Yeah I don't know about the quality of su57 But I have see a lot of problems with F35 I think F-16 is the best from USA, and su35 it's the best from Rusia.

[@АнтоДив]

Ну это явно не так. Да, технологии 141 были вывезены из России, ими американцы очень интересовались. Ведь до сих пор некоторые рекорды 141 не побиты. Но говорить о копии это глупо. Посмотри хотя бы на разницу вентилятора и двух двигателей за кабиной летчика.

[@rokimarchano5657]

So many armchair generals in here calling SU-57 Russian junk just because its not tested/combat-proved, that may be true and that’s why we cannot compare these two. What about F-22 and F-35, these two are proclaimed to be the best in the world just because they are tested and have real combat missions against weather balloons and Afghan barefoot peasants living in caves armed with rusty AK-47 and half century old RPG-7s. Last time US Air Force faced formidable air defenses (Vietnam), they lost more than 10,000 airplanes. Now, is it US junk or is it lost planes just operated in hot environment where opponent actually was able to shoot back and defend itself.

[@aleksas3058]

Imao si i NATO agresiju na Srbiju...I ako su Srbi bili slabo naoruzani uspjeli su oboriti americki ponos vazduhoplovstva F-117...

[@R.Y.M.777]

Помню как сбили сербы американское барахло)))))))))😂

[@garryb374]

Very good point. How can someone argue the F-35 is battle tested when it wont enter Syrian airspace because the Russians have S-400s there? Turkey was given the choice of Patriots and F-35s or S-400s and they chose the S-400s. Turkey was part of the team that made F-35s and was making wing components and they gave that up to have S-400s instead. How good can the F-35s be?

[@boogieboo5085]

The 10,000 number you're talking about includes over 5600 Helicopters and 1000 UAVs. 3744 were planes. The US used the F-4 Phantom in Vietnam for most of the heavy lifting in the way of air support, which many sources say didn't have mounted guns for air-to-air combat and relied solely on missiles that were wildly ineffective. The F-4 was consistently outclassed by the MiG 21 which was fast enough to close the distance and engage the F-4 in air-to-air dog-fighting. More F-4 Phantoms were shot down than any other plane used in Vietnam. I can't speak about the effectiveness of the F-22, the F-35, or the SU-57 outside of the massive amount of propaganda and hype surrounding these aircraft by their respective governments and militaries. I suppose we'll find out soon enough if (I certainly hope not) Ukraine is welcomed into NATO and the proxy war being fought there becomes a legitimate fight between Russia and the West.

[@AZURIAN-j7u]

The same barefoot afghans who crushed Russia in the first war? And don't tell me it's an old conflict after talking about Vietnam when it was no stealth capacity

[@АлексейРазуваев-р5э]

Есть такой анекдот:- " Американцы спрашивают у французов, когда лучше нападать на Россию, те только не зимой, ну французы у немцев, когда лучше,- те только не летом, спрашивают у Китайцев, те говорят - сейчас, а по чему? Да они сейчас байкало-амурскую магистраль доделают, космодром "Восточный" тоже, плюс магистраль к нам тянут, им ох как пленные нужны...

[@ДмитрийСерегин-к1ч]

Оружие России самое хорошее в мире и у нас есть вера и дух!!! Слава России 🇷🇺💪

[@draganpetrovic2314]

+ Слава БОГУ...привет из Србије+

[@AleksHawk]

Об этом не кричат на каждом углу, а молча дела делают

[@yomama629]

Russia has third best weapons in Ukraine after NATO and Ukrainian drones lmao

[@frzanwar2774]

@@yomama629 Thats why they are winning.

[@AshleyRiot-lf8dw]

Россия лузеры.

[@jomansur]

Fundamental to the design anything, particularly aircraft, is the design philosophy. US and Nato aircraft are not built with severe cost constraints. The use of technology is very highly valued. The purpose of these is very often offensive. There is a degree of refinement in the products not very highly valued by their Russian counterparts. These carry a corresponding price premium. Very often these aircraft are required to perform multiple types of missions and the compromises required create aircraft like the F35 (Stealth, VSTOL, fighter, ground attack etc) The Russian philosophy is very different- these aircraft are for defensive purposes only. Building an airframe for a high-speed interceptor is different to building one for a ground attack fighter, no point trying to combine them. They are war machines which in the event of war will have extremely short lives, no point wasting resources on unnecessary features. Better to have more specialised aircraft than fewer more flexible ones for the money. Given that most countries today cannot afford to operate more than a token force of these 5th Gen fighters, I suspect the Russians may have a point. Also with regards to missile technology at the moment, I think the Russians definitely have the edge.

[@Йорик-э7б]

You're wrong. Russian aircraft are more multi-purpose than the F-22 and F-35. The Su-57 has reasonable armament volumes, and there are two large ones, not one. They can carry all the weapons, including cruise missiles. F-22 and F-35 carry all large bombs and cruise missiles only on the wing. It has a long flight range and six radars. The front-facing radar has a range of more than 400 kilometers, which is twice as long as the F-22. And long-range air-to-air missiles with a flight range of 300 kilometers. The Su-34 has armor and can perform a real attack aircraft role, unlike the F-35. It can carry bombs or missiles weighing up to three tons, has a long flight range, and therefore can perform the functions of a ministrategist, in addition to the main function of a bomber.

[@Йорик-э7б]

We have only old aircraft such as the MiG-31, a fighter and carrier of the Dagger, and the Su-25, an attack aircraft, designed for certain functions. But they are modernized to the level of new ones to such an extent that they give shape to new ones in their functions. And yes, they don’t make disposable airplanes in Russia. Their service life must be at least 40 years. The same MiG-31 has been flying for more than 45 years, and it still has no equal in its incarnation.

[@jomansur]

@@Йорик-э7б I'm not sure why you think what I said contradicts anything you said: Su34 is an attack aircraft (specialised) Su57 is an air superiority fighter (specialised) F-35 is supposed to do everything but has sacrificed a lot for its stealth and up till now unproven. It's also unbelievably expensive, for the price of one you can get multiple Russian aircraft. Additionally, sustainment is a critical factor - current F35 fleets are only around 30% available. F-16s require incredible logistic support. Another example are ejection seats- Russian ones are simpler, cheaper to buy and maintain and as if not more effective in general. My point was that simplicity in design and philosophy might not be as sexy but often makes a better product.

[@Йорик-э7б]

​@@jomansurBoy, you could use some tightening up on some things. Our Su-25s are considered attack aircraft, while yours are A-10s. The Su-34 is a powerful fighter-bomber. He is the only one in the world among his fellow students who can carry 3 tons of load under the wing at one suspension point, which makes him a mini strategist, taking into account his long flight range of up to 4,500 kilometers without refueling and a maximum take-off weight of 45 tons. The F-15E has a maximum take-off weight of 36.7 tons. That is, it carries almost everything that strategic bombers can carry, but over a shorter distance. Except for the X-32, which weighs 6 tons.

[@Йорик-э7б]

​@@jomansurThe armored cabin and armor elements protecting the important equipment of the Su-34 allow it to work as an attack aircraft. Better than the Su-25 due to more equipment for working on ground targets. Integration of reconnaissance and electronic warfare containers into the Su-34 allows it to perform the functions of a reconnaissance and electronic warfare aircraft. The EA-18G can only perform electronic warfare functions. The maneuverability of the Su-34, which is no worse than any Western aircraft, the powerful radar and the R-37M air-to-air missile with a firing range of up to 300 kilometers can be overcome by any foreign fighter. That is, to fully perform the functions of a fighter. Su-34 is the most multifunctional and useful aircraft in the world. There is nothing similar to the Su-34 in any army in the world.

[@strizhi6717]

Yes it has been used in Ukraine and has shot down a MiG-29. Radar is stronger then F-35 and carries longer range weapon then either F-22 and F-35. Main reason everyone thinks su-57 is 4th plus gen is because of the round engine in the rear but same people ignore f-35 has even a much larger heat attractor then the Su-57...so shouldn't F-35 by that standard then be one below Su-57?? Su-57 can supercruise much longer distance and time and is the only 5th gen and really any aircraft thst utilizes oxygen from the outside giving pilot the ability to stay aloft longer then any other compared to tanks on F-22 and F-35 that limit their duration. This system is highly secretive and US tried to make it work and nearly killed one of their own F-22 pilots during test...program was scratched and ended- its still unknown how its done. WVR this thing will eat either of the aircraft for breakfast and BVR it will contend easily if nothing else at the very least use all countermeasures closing the gap until WVR is inevitable. Raptor and Lightning fanboys are pretty much simps onlyfans at this point..the countless upgrades Su-57 has gotten now on its final production line is beyond their scope of comprehension, imagination and understanding that they rather stick their heads in the sand hunting for worms

[@СергейМестечко-ю8к]

СУ-57 ПОЛУЧИЛ НОВЫЙ ДВИГАТЕЛЬ

[@sermoz2362]

The F22 has never been involved in combat, I wonder why?

[@АлександрШершнёв-р6с]

😂😂😂 чтобы не опозориться на весь мир!

[@kentprince4851]

Yes it has. It was in combat role with a Chinese weather balloon and took 2 attempts to shoot the Ballon down.

[@larobussi7315]

a 20 year old su 35 took some nice pictures from behind a f22 in siria :D

[@АлександрШершнёв-р6с]

​@@larobussi7315не совсем так!!! Су-35 оборудован системами соответствующими 5 поколению. У него один из лучших локаторов предназначенных для истребителя и оптиколокацоонная станция которой без разницы на технологию СТЕЛС.

[@larobussi7315]

@@АлександрШершнёв-р6с English or spanish pls

[@Андрей-д8к9и]

I wonder if the USA uses f22 or f35 in Ukraine? So why should Russia use the Su 57?

[@fabianabongo6284]

They even pulled the Abraham out of the frontline to avoid shame.

[@vivekbaruah5441]

​​@@fabianabongo6284I mean, 5 of them got destroyed at the start of April. They sent 31 of them... Welp....

[@fabianabongo6284]

@@vivekbaruah5441 and 29 f35 have crashed so far, before even engaging in any war. I wonder how many of these birds will fall of the sky just by themselves in a real combat situation.

[@vivekbaruah5441]

@@fabianabongo6284 HUUHH? 29??? I didn't know that! Damn, IF it's true. Let's see if the 'Felon' is increased in production. I don't think that'll happen till the end of this war starts... They've put EVERYTHING on modern infantry equipment and modifications of older war vehicles. And I think you know about the 'attacks' on Russia... So yeah...

[@Petite_Mustang]

War is chaos...the Russians know it, the Koreans knew it, the Vietnamese knew it, the Iraqis knew it, the Afghans knew it. It's only the Americans who seem not to know it. All wars America as fought in, they lost because their weapons are too advanced or too sophisticated and can not work reliably in chaos of war.

[@williamolekson9113]

The F-22's only confirmed kill was an innocent Chinese weather balloon, a balloon that never harmed a soul. Honestly, I'd rather have zero kills on my record than that one. It's funny though.

Cope orcbot

[@n.muelder]

meanwhile there isn't even a single operating squadron of SU57s

[@dgolovaSH]

​​@@n.muelder Blessed who believes. 😂😂 believing warms the heart

[@n.muelder]

@@dgolovaSH than tell me, where are they ?

[@dgolovaSH]

@@n.muelder you should not know this 😘

[@AkmalZ373]

your lack of knowledge while reviewing it really concerning.

[@silviustanca]

Right? He knows shit

[@JosipMiller]

@@silviustanca Yeah, I must agree with him. It is really nice looking aircraft.

[@bulaossr]

This guy has no clue about military aircraft. He should be commenting on Mickey Mouse cartoons.

[@sinisadabic5371]

Or maybe you were propaganded so much so you dont know whats real

[@daemianbox]

My very same thought. He's just talking shit

[@sergeishamanski8531]

Man, he's marine. Please be lenient

[@daemianbox]

@@sergeishamanski8531 🤣🤣🤣

[@shadmansudipto7287]

Obviously there's propaganda but that's not the point. His commentary was even worse than the original video containing no details. ​@@sinisadabic5371

[@Blurnow]

У меня над домом когда они на параде пролетают, этот их звук ни с чем не спутаешь, это самый лучший звук во вселенной!!!

[@projectedone]

I heard it on a video. Crazy howl.

[@projectedone]

@@МаркСотник don’t speak that language .

[@samppa281]

Now USA senate say to Austin only 29% F35 WORK RIGHT😀

[@zyou8er]

27% 😂

[@kaalisurfer600]

lol,western supremacy

[@IndependentThinkerAtBest]

F35 is a colossal failure. Looks like a bullfrog on heat.

[@diegonicolas9739]

After a mision the F35 need near a week of service time, and cost 3 time more than the Su 57

[@joeblowe4630]

Good thing we have hundreds and hundreds of them. Russia has 11 (ELEVEN) Su-57s HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[@nedgligich]

A congress report about 1-2 weeks ago highlighted and intresting point about the F35, only 25% of their F35's are flight capable the rest are being serviced or faulty in some way. It was quoted that for every 1hr flight time it spends 18hrs being serviced. The general consensus is the F35 is CRAP.

[@jfiji6501]

Not only that, but service has to be done by manufacturer's technicians as per the defense contract signed by congress. Not by military. There is a clip with a congressman holding up a bag of 6 small bolts and questioning the $6,000 price. It's porkbarel spending in action. Rape of the taxpayer.

[@jfiji6501]

Not only that, but service has to be done by manufacturer's technicians as per the defense contract signed by congress. Not by military. There is a clip with a congressman holding up a bag of 6 small F 35 bolts and questioning the $6,000 price. It's porkbarel spending in action. Rape of the taxpayer.

[@VioletSilence]

Your British is so British that my monitor started leaking tea and singing Rule Britannia

[@freeofbug]

S57 is made with metal and electronic board from washing machine. This is why the radar see a washing machine in the air, and not a plane.

[@Mr_McAlex]

😄😄😄👍👍

[@Andrey.Alexandru]

best comment

[@AV-hf5ej]

😂😂😂 100%

[@TaylerDerden-mc8xh]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@joeblowe3180]

There's only 11 of them HAHAHAHAHA

[@дмитрийорехов-я8с]

F22 is the invincible balloon killer.

[@starikanleks3198]

И то с 3-й попытки убили шарик?😂😂

[@sergejstremel3690]

Вы никогда нас не понимали и не поймёте! Нас не нужна реклама! Мы не строим самолёты, да и вообще вооружение для маркетинга и продажи, нам оно нужно для ЗАЩИТЫ!

[@alexkor380]

1. There is no need to build many SU-57s if an upgrade is possible. For what? So that later build as many more improved ones. Today Russia has enough aircraft of generations 4++, 4+, 4. The Americans did NOT risk going into battle with any of these aircraft (with a Russian pilot). They only cry about the “dangerous and unprofessional” behavior of Russian pilots. 2. For real tests, 10 units is enough - they are fighting in Ukraine. Unlike the F-35. The USA has already produced more than 3,500 of these aircraft. This happened despite the fact that more than 700 problems with the aircraft were identified. more than 100 of them are critically lethal for the pilot (Wikipedia). And knowing about the US love to hush up its problems, we can safely say that there are many more problems on this plane. 3. F-22. The only combat use is the “war” against a balloon from China. The Chinese balloon (without resisting) was shot down ONLY AFTER THE 3RD ATTEMPT. The first 2 missiles from the F-22 flew “to nowhere”. Efficiency - 33-34%. Let's return now to the SU-57. NEVER, ANYWHERE, has this aircraft been officially declared as a STEALTH fighter. SU-57 is a fighter with LOW VISIBILITY ELEMENTS. This means that it (unlike the F-22, 35) is NOT completely covered with a stealth coating - only partially. The remaining low visibility is achieved due to the geometry of the airframe. Why did it happen? 2 reasons: 1. Reason: At high speeds, the stealth coating peels off the plane, like skin after a sunburn. Therefore, American F22, 35 pilots are ORDERED to turn on the afterburner ONLY FOR SHORT PERIODS OF TIME. no more than 20 seconds. 2. The main reason. Stealth was fully studied in the USSR. It was revealed that stealth works against radar systems on the 1st frequency range and in one direction. As soon as a stealth aircraft begins ANY maneuver, it lights up on the radar like a regular aircraft. As soon as the radar switches to a different frequency range, the stealth aircraft appears on the radar like a regular aircraft.. Therefore, the USSR refused to develop this direction - no prospects. But... the KGB “allowed” spies from the United States to find out about this “super-secret” development. And then the KGB “allowed” spies from the United States to “steal” exactly as many technical documents as were necessary to interest the United States. As a result, the United States spent trillions on the final development and implementation of stealth. Then they built a lot of these aircraft. If they could have simply buried these days, the result would have been the same. The planes are NOT maneuverable, NOT fast. These planes can do NOTHING against Russian detection systems (multi-band).

[@sergey_korolyov]

Россия применяет СУ-57 для атак по средствам ПВО по типу С-200 и С-300, я пока не знаю, применялись ли СУ-57 для атак по ПВО Патриот и другим противовоздушным системам производства стран НАТО. Также СУ-57 успешно атаковал несколько мобильных систем РЛС и РЭБ с помощью новых ракет, которые еще не имеют названия, а только кодовые маркировки.

[@AugustKling]

F22 and F35 have the Fentanyl problem from US empire.

[@РасимМуханбетгалиев]

Я тут смотрю по коментам и вижу, что собрались одни главные конструкторы ведущих авиостроительных фирм 😂😂😂

[@Krendel1999]

Я тоже ржу 😂

[@e36MPower]

Аминь, Братцы

[@другРазума]

Да, это так. Я - Сухоян. Какие вопросы?

[@macakucizmama831]

Supposedly they were used in both Syria and Ukraine, and supposedly it was undetected by the Ukrainian radars. That is what I read somewhere

[@Zato4ka]

су 57 не используют на украине .. там выполняют задачи другие самолеты. у нас нету самолета на все случаи жизни .. есть самолеты под каждую задачу .. задач для су 57 в украине нет.

[@macakucizmama831]

@@Zato4ka да, су35с, су30см, су35…

[@Zato4ka]

@@macakucizmama831 су 25 тоже

[@lianobarbosa8438]

Yes they use Su-57 in Ucrânia the way they should like a ninja 🥷

[@karlvongazenberg8398]

4:08 State ownership - fun fact, Lake City Ammunition Plant IS government owned and so were the Royal Navy's dockyards. Besides while Sukhoi is state owned, it has to compete against MiG (Mikoyan-Gurevich and Yak, ie. Yakovlev) design bueraus... Or there is the Rheinmetall Hungary, which is partly state owned (see Kf41 Lynx). So, state ownership in itself is not the problem.

[@McMannis505]

It’s not stealth. On its best day it’s “reduced visibility”

[@daflea66]

Gen 4.1 😀

[@sseltrek1a2b]

yeah- Russia tends to over-state the quality of what they create...

[@JayStizz]

Yes the problem is The Thrust vectoring is superior 3d thrust vs 2d in the raptor which makes it extremely hard to kill a Su-57 even with an F-22 thats where the Su-57's true danger lies

[@jtl-08]

@@JayStizz That only matters if they get to the merge which is much more difficult for the felon because of the F-22's superior stealth capabilities.

[@MichaelScheele]

@@jtl-08, exactly. The F-22 will detect and lock onto the Su-57 before the Su-57 knows it is even there.

[@francojustthat156]

watch congressman gaetz grill DOD austin about the F22s and F35s situation right now...

[@yomama629]

Watch a Russian asset try to discredit the most advanced and capable aircraft ever built? No I'm good

[@francojustthat156]

@@yomama629 whatever floats your boat...how about this American vet.. kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKDNnWCVmtWdldU&ab_channel=DanielDavis%2FDeepDive

[@francojustthat156]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmmfmOriqeAr8U&ab_channel=TheMoverandGonkyShow

[@francojustthat156]

@@yomama629 kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKmmfmOriqeAr8U&ab_channel=TheMoverandGonkyShow

[@Ecroartu]

@@yomama629 any proof about "most advanced and capable aircraft ever built"? they have zero operational flights, besides those poor and highly dangerous chinese weather baloons, tho we all know that F-35 was destroyed in a test flights. srsly, i need proof!)

[@sergk.3449]

SU-57 ist der beste, wo der jetzt noch ein neuen Motor hat!

[@jordanwood4687]

Favorite fact. A squadron of F22s could not defeat a squadron of SU57s. …. Because there aren’t enough SU57s to make a squadron. :)

[@steeljawX]

I was just about to comment that the title of the video is a bit misleading. "Competing with" would imply that it has the presence to actually stand in competition with the F-22 and F-35. The fact it hasn't been flown outside demos, tests, and wang-waggling parades kind of disqualifies it from the verb "compete".

[@durwardsaar6000]

@@steeljawX 3 Operating in Syria. They take to the air and the US grounds all their planes. The SU-57 is the far superior plane with further flight range, superior radar, superior jamming, superior weapons and superior weapon range. It's no contest. Americans are the most lied to people in all of history. Still "winning" in Ukraine?

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

If you compare six su57 to six f22 the su57 with its much better weapons systems eg faster ,longer range would win . Especially if supported by ground air defences s400

[@ALZAV86]

О чем ты говоришь? F-22 не смог сбить китайский зонд с первого раза🤣

[@vibe5207]

SU 57 is called SU 57 cause an F 22 + F 35 makes 57.... No US American jet can beat this thing..

[@veritasliberabitvos454]

The main thing that gives the su-57 an advantage is the long range missiles, they have over double the range of anything F35/F22 can fire. Plus these missiles can be guided from other ISR assets along the way that have better details of the target. This is something Russia ahs shown with the S-400 systems being guided from air assets closer to the intended Ukraine planes - mean Russia has claims kills at 400 Km from the missile launch point. And these missiles can do more than 15G turns while doing around Mach 5~6. So, the pilot has almost no warning that they will be penetrated without consent.

[@АлександрНевский-н3э]

Уважаемый!Главное Кто сидит за Штурвалом)а не за Каким Самолетом!К Сожелению из 1000 Истории России ,Мы 800 лет Воюем)и Нас учат не воевать,А Побеждать!С Уважением

[@e36MPower]

@@АлександрНевский-н3э Дядь, ты бы хоть по-русски сформулировал, нихера не понятно)

[@yomama629]

The only thing the S-400 has shown is that it can't stop a Cessna from penetrating 700km into Russian airspace or drones the size and speed of a Cessna from hitting Moscow. The AIM-120D is far more advanced than any Russian missile, it has a range of about 200km but it has a far, far higher success rate than those Russian cope missiles that hit their targets about 10% of the time at that max range. AIM-260 is coming this year and it will be double the range of AIM-120 while maintaining its lethality. This is also all very much irrelevant since Russian radars can't target an F-22 or F-35 beyond visual range anyway

[@e36MPower]

@@yomama629 bla bla bla... and bla bla bla

[@yomama629]

@@e36MPower cry orc bot

[@kentprince4851]

If you originally was confused about the mig-31 vs the two US 5th gen fighters, you shouldn't be doing this blog and shows how up to date you are. The mig 31 is a 20th century design, non stealth interceptor. The su 57, F22, f35 are stealth combat,multi role fighters.

[@SagtWasErDenkt]

You ask , why we will see not more? I think , they need in the moment no more.🤔 But i think , they have much more. When the Russian , will, Ukraine was gone , long time ago.. Russia is built for defense.

[@Always3000]

It doesn’t matter how stealthy the paint is that fighter jet is so big. It has his own ZIP Code.

[@Funkey_Legend]

Its literally the size of the f22, look it up

[@raphael3620]

Size doesn’t matter. Even the B52 spirit is bigger but still good. Size isn’t the deal

[@lianobarbosa8438]

@@raphael3620 this dude is dumb 😂 I was about to say the same thing

[@davidlloyd2583]

SU57 is twice as fast as the F35, has twice the range, has twice the bomb load with stronger hard points. Its getting a new engine and drone wingmen.

[@hxkdneuxbxjdidndnxj]

you didn’t cover SU-57 drones and networking capabilities, I suggest you look into that

[@brathuhnmitreis]

The Russians are using GLONASS instead of the outdated GPS (from the 1970s)... Remember GLONASS was brought to fully working in 2014 and uses state of the art communication. Thats one advantage...

[@nilnull5457]

The russians gave away a lot of its stealth for its maneuverability, but it still has a lot of features.

[@Rusich945]

rcs f22=rcs su57=0,3

[@aural_supremacy]

Only 39% of F35’s are operational the rest have problems, F35 is a lemon, as far as whether the SU57 can go head to head with an F22 in a fight, 1: you don’t ever want to find out because we would be on the brink of nuclear war, and 2 it all comes down to the pilots and U.S pilots have no dogfight experience in real combat because they always pick on countries with no real air power, it’s not the machines it’s the pilots, Russians combat test their weapons they don’t just play war games.

[@VioletSilence]

Also an answer to your question about Su-57 combat usage: it was used in Syrian campaign for ground strikes and in Ukraine for various combat missions so yes, it has some combat record already. What I find funny though is that Su-57 while being deployed in Ukrainian war MISSED a stationary ground target But achieved a 200+ km kill on Ukrainian Su-27 So it can destroy an enemy aircraft (moreover, a fighter - rather small and nimble target) at extreme range but can't hit a large ground target which doesn't even move Why

[@Ecroartu]

i wonder when you get that info. as i know, all the targets, real targets, has been eliminated. tho, again, i wonder where did you get an info about not only SU-57 usage, but misses too.

[@paulroberts7429]

This Su-57 on screen is for export a new SU-57m with a new AL-51F1 engine and insane up-grades as finished testing, it will be introduced in January.

[@petr416]

Western arrogance VS microchips from refrigerators and washing machines and Russians high velocity army shovels...😉

[@gabrielfernandez145]

I wonder how confident is America about the F-22 if it only shoot downs balloons 🤣

[@mishkabaloo1447]

Warning: Here in the comments are experts in armor, aviation, physics, and strategic battle science

[@fradiavolo9293]

Include crowing and braying too.

[@yomama629]

Here in the comments are mostly Russian bots coping because 150,000 of their men are dead fighting the poorest country in Europe and they're still no closer to victory

[@maximprokopov4328]

@@yomama629 Ukraine is not the poorest country, it has a lot of resources for agriculture, coal, iron. In terms of resources, it is almost the richest country among the countries of the European Union, otherwise it would not have been blocked by neighboring countries, and it also had the strongest army among NATO countries on the European continent, but nevertheless, Russia used 100,000 military at the beginning of the conflict, and when they realized that Ukraine he does not want a peace treaty, where the conditions were very favorable for Ukraine, they partially mobilized and gathered 500,000 more military personnel and no longer mobilized to replenish troops in the conflict with Ukraine, and Ukraine continues to mobilize people to send them to the war zone, some Ukrainian military are defecting to Russia, and some prisoners refuse to return to Ukraine. And yet, it is the Americans and especially British Prime Minister Boris Johnson who are directly to blame for the conflict. When a peace treaty was almost agreed between Ukraine and Russia, Boris Johnson came to Ukraine and ordered to continue fighting against Russia, and so the military conflict could end in May 2022, as officials in Ukraine say.

[@batrezz]

@@yomama629 addicted CNN make your comment so f funny lol

[@yomama629]

@@maximprokopov4328 Ukraine is a sovereign nation buddy, they don't take orders from Boris Johnson. Russians are so used to having puppet states instead of allies that they don't understand the distinction, but that's not how it works on this side. What "conditions" would a nation unjustly, illegally invaded by a terrorist state with zero provocation on their part accept for peace other than "get out of our country"? Especially when Russia just wanted a peace treaty to rebuild their forces after their great convoy to Kyiv got destroyed, they're not actually interested in peace they just want an old fashioned land grab

[@MrAmirtoosi]

never use your best weapons for a weak enemy

[@джеимсдигриз-у9л]

the F-22 and F-35 have shit themselves and are no longer the best in the world (I still laugh like the f-22 shot itself down with a rocket) the Su-57 at least does not shoot itself down

[@PirandelloKruger]

У меня аналогичный вопрос - с чего вы взяли что техника америки лучшая в мире ?! Во всех симуляторах она проигрывает по маневренности и в целом по разумности применения . Начиная от подготовленных полос взлёта и заканчивая тем что они тяжелые и устаревшие где модернизируется только ракетное вооружение и на него же ставят все карты .. К примеру на дружеских соревнованиях в америки русские лётчики летали на Су 30 против ф15 и их мнение было до того завышенное очень а после наоборот - вопрос поддавались ли американцы для вида или нет будет открыт всегда . Но то что американская техника против серьезной армии никогда не выступала это факт , она бомбила крестьян у которых не было даже ПВО и авиации которая могла бы дать отпор .. Суть в том что к примеру идет длительный конфликт - и какой будет ресурс выработки американской техники - сможет ли она каждое утро доставлять ракеты и бомбы как наша в России . У нас техника работает до такой степени что на хвостах вертолетов и самолетов присутствует серьезный нагар от топлива где даже красные звезды не видно - американская техника всегда чистая и не видно серьезных следов эксплуатации . Те же ракеты сможет ли она выпускать каждый день ибо насколько я слышал они очень дорогие и делают их частные компании малыми партиями . Учитывая статистику по высадке в европе где 415 000тыс американцев убито 616 000 ранено и это только одна италия где было сопротивление Франция особо не считается - вывод на мой взгляд такой что американцы так и не научились воевать они лишь могут осыпать бомбами столицу страны третьего мира , уничтожать людей без разбора . kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3TUeJh3oruoZ6ssi=PQjcHgCbK6dOEhQ- Может сравним А10 и Су25 ? Вообще это странные сравнения ибо я еще не видел ни одного воздушного боя ф22 или ф35 "я видел только как они падают и загораются около взлетных полос" где статистика падений из за неисправностей ф22 пугает с 2000х годов и нигде в войне тоже не видел , слышал про то что в ф35 скапливается в кабине конденсат то есть вода а это смертельно для любого самолета . Емен бомбили Ф18 что странно , почему не ф35 или ф22 - ответ прост и очевиден . Могу лишь сказать что танки абрамс это редкое дерьмо так же как и леопард где крыша танка всего 20мм и их подбито уже более 20 ... Так же я был свидетелем того как падали ракеты ХАРМ на людей потому что выходили из строя - украинцы их запускали и они не куда не долетая падали в радиусе 10км на собственных граждан это можно проверить по осколкам от ракеты ведь они предназначались для поражения радаров . Кроме как пиар акции и реклама которая делает америка своей технике по факту ничего не имеет , в реальном бою нужна простота и надежность - у нас испытывают технику в разных условиях от +50 до -50 это касается всего что есть в армии . Я забыл сказать про стоимость самолетов , у вас делаеют самолеты частные компании которые повышают их себестоимость четырехкратно у нас же это финансирует государство и оно же производит для своих нужд и себе стоимость в 3-4 раза ниже чем у вас . Вообще мало кто в мире из стран может с нуля сделать самолет где бы все детали были произведены в одной стране - по моему уже таких стран не осталось кроме РФ ибо монополия США посадила всех на свои "агрегатные узлы" . Даже когда смотришь на новый турецкий истребитель вглядываешься и пытаешься понять сколько там американских деталей ) На самом деле это грустно ведь разные подходы дают прогресс а не только псевдо открытый рынок для своих братков - например Як141 сопло которого сегодня америка применяет на ф35 . ) И стелс технологии не делают невидимым самолет для радаров а лишь занижают его облучение . И с этим научились бороться еще в 70-80 точно не помню , достаточно иметь две станции РЛС радиусом в 100-150км что бы облученный самолет со стелс видела две станции облучения и сопровождения - одна облучает вторая видит тень где облучения нет и уже есть автоматика которая всё показывает на экране и станции общаются между собой автоматически это теперь еще один режим работы ПВО. Так что я очень ждут ф35 в бою и их обломки ведь война это не пустить ракету в свадебное мероприятие где нибудь в Афганистане . kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpybYnSMhK57rcksi=01oOoOr6TkUEwxDH kzbin.info/www/bejne/nJ3ccnemeJaCpNEsi=-A-WRe_ePepJ0XcY kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpnZqGyjj9mKb6csi=1CZ5LDu-1LkS8xVa kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5PGnZmLoc-rrposi=QR_nRAJ2-hNh4LS- kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXzZnadsp9WVarssi=sPahimfAk0Sz-j4R kzbin.info/www/bejne/d4TPeHx6Z9OZmqMsi=3eco0EqhY168ZuF3 kzbin.info/www/bejne/f3K2fox6g6upsLssi=Ow0YoZq3O_93KLgP kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHuWe4CNnaZ-Y68si=U_okdKO55NpW-W-X kzbin.info/www/bejne/hWbCmZafjtl1hLMsi=xBEslx9qTDpW9r-8 kzbin.info/www/bejne/jp2ZlJeXZ9aXepIsi=Ba7M7pKJD-stdW0C kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmKne2Z-Zpqqeq8si=ZBIAkbaJsf5t2Cvo

[@WarpedSpeed]

The F22 is/was a state of the art fighter jet for its time. It is still an exceptional fighter but no longer state of the art. The F35 is not a fighter jet as we think, it is more of a stealth light bomber, designed to be a platform to launch attacks from. but not to dog fight. Drones and AI kill machines are the wave of the future, manned aircraft are old school.

[@johanboshoff5554]

It's a Stealth plane, your not supposed to see it. The other thing is, we will probibly never see dog fights again, as most missiles can take out an oponent at distance.

[@joeblowe3180]

BOT COMMENT

[@joseze8569]

SU57...SIMPLY THE BEST😮

[@Wallfahrt7247]

There is no video that proves that the f -22 famous in Western propaganda has had a real combat against another fighter plane, it only exists in movies and video games. The F-22 is fantastic at shooting down drones, balloons and stationary targets, so what will it be like when it encounters a manned fighter jet? Well, this is nothing, while the F-22 uses a missile worth several thousand dollars just to shoot down a 100 euro Chinese balloon. Well, the Russians, by just releasing a little fuel from an SU-27, shot down an MQ-9 Reaper drone worth millions of dollars. When the United States tries to build superhero stories linked to its identity, it is almost always fictional characters such as Captain America, Rambo, Spider-Man, The Incredible Hulk, etc. Let's take an example: we have Maverick with his F-14. . Tomcat, a two-seat heavy fighter from the 1980s, easily shot down not one but two Su-57s, one of the most modern in the Russian arsenal. And what about Rambo, who took out an entire battalion of Spetsnaz soldiers with just a bow and arrow? However, in the end Russia decided to do the same by telling stories of triumphs. of feats. linked to your identity. Unlike Washington, however, the Russians do not need to resort to fiction. 👏🤝

[@Outlaw86SK]

government dont cut corners for profit unlike private companies

[@kyld8674]

Дошел до места про миг 25. Спасибо, мне достаточно.

[@TRENERA-1]

I am asking you for the umpteenth time (and you and others with similar videos): DO NOT compare the SU-57 with any other military aircraft. The same applies to the SU-35. They are a completely separate ranking and can possibly be compared with each other. The remaining SU-27, F-22 (which is not approved by the US Department of Defense), EuroFighter, SU-25, Gripen, F-35, the "Chinese Swallow" or the fastest aircraft in the world named MiG-31, can to be compared with each other. Anyone who has looked at aircraft performance (not on paper) should know this. Especially if you claim to be an 'expert'.

[@Thenonsocial]

The radar cross section "RCS" is nowhere near adequate. It is believed Russia posseses around 10 SU57s around this time. They have been deployed in Ukraine but only by lobbing missiles from well within the Russian air defense bubble. When it did weapons were mounted externally on pylons suggesting the internal weapons bays arent as versatile or straight up not fully functional.

[@Crayon__Muncher]

Well the F-35 could also mount weapons externally. But they would only do that if they have air superiority, when the need to carry more missiles outweighs stealth in that specific scenario. So maybe the ruskies just did that since they weren't going into contested airspace and were staying within their air defence bubble. But y'know you could also be right, maybe the internal weapons bay wasn't working properly.

[@Johnnytobassco]

Honest question, how do we know they mounted them externally if they were fired from well with in Russian territory. Is there footage or how are we making this assessment?

[@Crayon__Muncher]

Yea, what the guy below me said

[@zagrepcanin82]

RCS is top secret. for every jet. so claiming that absurd number of 1 micrometer for F22 is also advertising. and no military will tell the real number. why USA feared of selling F35 to TUrkey? because Nebo-M radar of s400 would make a scan and russian technicians would download its data and got the intel about f35. no military will release RCS value publicly

[@vivekbaruah5441]

Umm, I don't think those are the 'Felons'. Maybe a '35' or a '30'. Cause from what I heard, the 'Felons' have only been deployed in Syria. Only new projectiles are being used in this UKR-RUS war, maybe their new battle rifles, but most of their 'Modern' equipment isn't being used. T-14s are rarely seen, with one of those getting blasted by a Bradley. They're using 'Turtle' Tanks (T-72s With a covered top, drone resistance) and rarely 'Kurganets'. They're using million dollar missiles to $500 drones.😂

[@alexandrnoskov5437]

The Su-57 is being used right now in Ukraine. If you haven't seen it, it means stealth is working.

[@black_cat2023]

F35+F22= SU57😁

[@enricoorsini7872]

it's so stealth....that nobody has never seen it flight !!! Magical ...

[@LuminaMentis]

yeahyeah and the f-22 oly shoot down a Chinese un armed “Meteorological ballon” soo.. what is your point

[@enricoorsini7872]

@@LuminaMentis there are more than 200 F22 only in the States...so many pictures can be seen everywhere... show me a picture of more than two SU 57. where are they....invisible?????

[@muhammadhaikal-oc3tc]

@@enricoorsini7872 do more reserch

[@enricoorsini7872]

@@muhammadhaikal-oc3tc kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXibf5aajc6ShLMsi=3hYyBVWAk-hHPKZV

[@enricoorsini7872]

@@muhammadhaikal-oc3tc 24 ....maybe....

[@jasonkristian8457]

it has flown many times in ukraine , the x69 missle has been reported used by Ukrane over 40 times, and the SU57 is only combat aircraft that can use the x69 missle

[@Texas.T]

The SU'57 has a same radar crossection as a P51 mustang.

[@edwardcalvet]

😂

😂😂😂

[@crestedgeckochannel2128]

On its best day 💀

[@vivekbaruah5441]

Go read about the recent 'Situation' of the f35s and f22s.

[@crestedgeckochannel2128]

@@vivekbaruah5441 btw mine was a joke

[@user-trapeznikov]

F22 был супер пока не появился СУ 57 , это рождение легенды планер очень крутой на подходе двигатель а затем искусственный интеллект !

[@SamFBM]

the howl of that thing is crazy

[@alext5285]

Yes. From a distance, you may not recognize his form, but you will forever remember his banshee voice.

[@Josiah-w8u]

Check out the SU-57m the actual release model, the reason they have been building them so slow is because not all the new tech is ready but they need to keep the production line open while waiting

[@mikemilk2653]

So it just a bluff, like the Armata-14.

[@loftiestchaf423]

what Armata? oh wait the one tank they're using as trainers because the manufacturer themselves said they can't make more of them

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

@@loftiestchaf423 They are using them in Ukraine . A lot more than one with more coming

[@loftiestchaf423]

@@TrevorCrook-c1s Sources? all I can find are articles on how Russia withdrew the tanks from the frontline months ago. Uralvagonzavod said themselves, they can't make more due to the high cost. It's also a tank built with with outdated western tech and has a lot of design problems, it is not a threat anyway

[@loftiestchaf423]

@@TrevorCrook-c1s "Russian tanks are Russian," that doesn't mean they didn't import tech and rebrand it as "Russian". Night vision tech is one of the biggest imports, and now they can't get it due to sanctions. Most of the tanks delivered are refurbished from sitting in storage. Even with all those tanks, Russia is still losing them at a high rate. Russia has always produced cheap equipment at the cost of crew safety and survivability. A true winning army doesn't take more casualties and equipment losses than the opposition.

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

@@loftiestchaf423 You are wrong and going on old information . Russia uses Russian made parts including computer chips What else it needs it get from China . You don’t think Russia would launch an operation while being dependent on the west for anything militarily, economically do you ? No one is that stupid A true winning army doesn’t take more losses than the opposition . You are correct . That is why you know russia is taking less losses . Because they are winning

[@hadi96100]

The F-35 specializes in flying underwater.

[@jamesgirard1090]

The SU 57 definitely has some problems. India was involved in the development and pulled out of the deal due to underperformance not to mention only a dozen have been made and three or four of those at least are trainers.

[@MichaelScheele]

Western sanctions have reduced the Russians' capability to produce their most advanced weapons systems. That will factor into their ability to gain export sales. No foreign military is going to want to pay for equipment that would be prioritized for domestic use, leaving them waiting for delivery.

[@charlesrichardson8635]

India invested over $250M before dropping out. China looked at it and said no. Indonesia said no. There was a Middleeastern country I can't remember right now that said no. Meanwhile over 17 countries have joined the F35 program. The estimated RCS of the SU57 learned from sources that had close inspection of the SU57 is 1 sq m or the same as a F18 Super Hornet.🤣

[@iDeezo]

Russia is way behind, the F-22 was made in the early 80s/90s and yet still is the most feared aircraft till this day lol.

[@mikkorenvall428]

@@iDeezo Then again, we haven't seen F-22 in fights either. Why? Does it has some flaws or out of date features that US don't want to be presented to the world? And why did US Airforce stop orders for F-35? Was it the expences, of is there something wrong wirh the planes?

[@iDeezo]

@mikkorenvall428 F-35, there were some problems with mass production i heard, As for the F-22, they've been upgrading them with modern tech over the years. The reason why you don't see them in fights is because the F-22 is meant to mainly defend the US from attacks now. They hardly send them out of the country due to the high costs and because they are very limited. It was originally built for the Cold War Era to be the superior air dominance fighter with stealth capabilities, but when they finished production, the war was already over! Now, it just makes more sense to send out F-35B into combat since they can easily be shipped via Aircraft Carriers.

[@ask_sigma6]

I suspect it is better overall designed than an F-35.... since Russia did the opposite what the US did, i.e. they made only one or two models and rigorously tested it BEFORE mass production considerations, whereas the US stupidly started concurrently mass producing different variants only to discover major fundamental design flaws in the BASIC model! AFTER mass production, thereby making those flaws near impossible to correct without costing additional HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars... design flaws that still exist in some shape or form today....

[@chancemayon4608]

😂 Russia saying they 6-10 years ahead ! We built the raptor in the 90s and they have made I think 11 su57 which half aren’t combat capable!

[@HyperMODX]

Well he said in air to air missiles so what's the status for that in the US

[@user-pu2iw9nx4j]

This is probably why most countries buy Russian efficient and cheap aircraft and eventually win local wars.

[@user-pu2iw9nx4j]

American aviation has been recognized as two generations behind in Europe. Europe then bought equipment from China, Russia and Turkey

[@user-pu2iw9nx4j]

Today, NATO has shown that she is like a little dog in front of a bulldog, capable only of barking

[@AlexBizzar]

@@user-pu2iw9nx4j 🤖🤖🤣🤣Bot detected as easily as the Su57 🤣🤣🤖🤖

[@dabig_guy2204]

Only 29% of ALL F22 are ready for service as most are grounded due to a slew of technical or mechanical issues. Imagine if you buy an incredible expensive car, and you can only drive it two days a week.

[@tj_2701]

The Su-57 isn't actually a true 5th Gen. The newest version of the F-16 has a special paint job that gives it a similar or slightly smaller Radar signature compared to the Su-57. The only reason it gets away with using the term stealth is because it's stealthier than the rest of Russian jets. Hell the old F-117 has a smaller Radar signature. Also, the big plus it does have with it's 3D thrust vectoring is planned to be removed in order to decrease it's Radar signature. It will either end up with none or just 2D thrust vector like the F-22. Also, Russia is scared to use it anywhere because of the fact it's too easy to shoot down.

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

The Americans have yet to use any of their aircraft in high intensity war . Whatever problems the Russians are having in Ukraine in regard to air defence the Americans would have . If the Ukrainians can shoot down a su57 they can shoot down a f22

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

Russian air to air missiles that su57 carries are generations ahead of anything the Americans have

[@DenisShell]

бля диванный эксперт)) вы то где свой F22 использовали))? (бомбежка пастухов не в счет) тоже наверно легко сбить?) я тебе больше скажу все ваши самолетики наши комплексы собьют как нефиг делать поэтому вы и ссыте их передавать хохлам) кстати абрамсы четко горят я оценил везите еще нам металлом нужен хоть что то полезное из него сделаем а то ваши абрамсы хлам.

[@AlekseyDegterev]

11:25 a missile with an officially declared range of 40km is cause for concern, and the fact that Ukrainian planes are falling hundreds of kilometers from the front is not cause for concern?😁

[@davidleonid9674]

Ну, что я могу подумать про это видео? - диванная аналитика на должном уровне. На последний вопрос, который тут прозвучал, я отвечу вопросом: а где эти а американские F16 и F35? Почему не на Украине? Почему посылают, посылают и никак не пришлют? Ответ на оба вопроса одинаковый. Как мужик мужику: раз уж интересно глазеть на самолётики, так поинтересуйся темой пошире.

[@Medoed_005]

Да все эти F просто пропиаренная техника.. F16 они еще пошлют а вот F35 врядли.. леопарды потеряли свои позиции в ходе СВО как и абрамсы.. так что будут на украине только старьем пополнять.. заоодно и на утилизацию тратиться не будут.

[@jamesaron1967]

There aren't many SU-57 fighters. Russia has used them sparingly according to the news sites I follow. It doesn't want to risk having one shot down and then retrieved by enemy forces. So, they aren't flown regularly in this conflict. Russia is fighting against a country that barely has an air force and inadequate anti-aircraft systems. Its older planes are more than capable of doing the job.

[@-EchoesIntoEternity-]

the F-22 and F-35 radar cross section is reportedly about 0.001sqm, the SU-57 is more like a 0.5sqm.

[@theunknown5962]

Source?

[@KhanKeal]

@@theunknown5962 take your pick, theres dozens of them that have all confirmed it.

[@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell]

RCS f-22 is 0.0001m^2

[@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell]

​@@theunknown5962heard of Google?

[@snakebyte98]

F117 had an RCS of 0.001sqm and look how it got shot down by soviet AA rocket from the 60s in Serbia in 1999 xD

[@oTNTo]

Point of being stealth and so good is that no one lived to talk he see it

[@dalcon04]

Russia has a long history of all show no go. They will say it’s a advanced aircraft but the reality is it falls short

[@MillOutSound]

Слушайте мы не инженеры, не конструкторы и уж тем более не пилоты чтобы иметь возможность сравнить наши самолеты. И дай бог чтобы этого никогда не случилось в прямом столкновении между нашими странами. Все что мы можем это хвастаться нашими птичками :) и гордиться самолетами построеными в своей стране. Мир вам и нам.

[@kstephens415]

No it's weapons and missiles are not 5 to 10 years ahead of the US. Nor is this actually a fifth gen fighter. This is more like a 4.5. The radar evasive paint is not comparable to the US, and if you look closely at the construction of the plane there are hundreds of rivets, where the screws are part of the outside structure which will give almost 10 times the RCS

[@theunknown5962]

Source?

[@pelteapel1490]

​@@theunknown5962source is look it up yourself it's not hard.

[@dompapp4396]

Right about the construction of target about missile technology. So far off target. You think you're using a Patriot system?😂

[@helopilotr]

I feel like this video has just been raided with bots, imo...

[@supbruhh]

"its not always about plane its about the pilot"

[@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell]

It is not about dog fights anymore.

[@igs_]

​@@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell thats what the designers of the F-4 thought too. They were also greatly mistaken

[@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell]

@@igs_ true

[@nainshit7]

Su 57 proved itself in actual war. Lets see american birds other than attacking goat herders in the middle east 😂

[@2FlyCaptain]

The SU-57 has a radar cross section equal to that of an F/A-18E Super Hornet. It's not a stealth aircraft. Up against an F-22, the Felon would get shot down before it even knew it was in a fight.

[@Adplusamequalsadam]

The speed part was wrong. Mach 2 is its max speed, Mach 1.3 is max without afterburner. It can’t do Mach 2 without afterburner.

[@mikemilk2653]

They have those only 11. Its not real generation 5 plane, only 4, and has got a lot of huge problems. Too expensive too, what is one reason why so low count of them.

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

The f35 has been fraught with problems . It’s a lemon and badly designed aerodynamically Russia plans on having nearly 200 of them at some point. And with Russian massive manufacturing capacity it won’t be that long I have heard they have 80 of them . Hard to verify anything

[@Ustiyan]

More expensive than F-22 or F-35?