A Russia Su-25 almost collides with a Ukrainian DJI Mavic drone in Donetsk region. Sanath Donation Link www.gofundme.com/f/helping-uk...
Пікірлер: 546
@sanathdemel362115 күн бұрын
What a GREAT video Suchomimus!!! I really enjoyed that one, though pity the drone didn't get wedged in the turbine. I'm Sanath, the person at the end of the clip running the fundraiser. As you can see, we've collected the 4x4 vehicle, to be converted into an armoured 4x4. It will be installed with an BMW M57 engine, because of the additional weight from ceramics and kevlar. These are urgently required at the front, along with Pick Up trucks...they can't get enough of them! Thank you to everyone that's donated. We can't do this without your support!!
@fabianschrotter15 күн бұрын
Thank you for being awesome!
@trashtrashisfree15 күн бұрын
Stay safe Sanath.
@NZobservatory15 күн бұрын
This video has been debunked as fake everywhere.
@AstroGremlinAmerican15 күн бұрын
Fantastic to see you, Sanath! Thank you for all you do.
@EEX9762315 күн бұрын
@@IconoclastXshit poster slope
@racialconsciousness699615 күн бұрын
The stabilization on that Mavic is unbelievable.
@-108-15 күн бұрын
EXACTLY. Unbelievable. lol
@dzonikg15 күн бұрын
DJI holds 78% off world drone market for a reason.I have for more the a year DJI mini which is only 249 grams and is amazing how such small drone has stabile video even in the wind ,and is very agile .Cant imagine bigger drones how they act ,this one was my first drone and for now only ,even is to tiny its 99% off my needs off recording
@raz437115 күн бұрын
@@-108- if you was educated and actually flew drones you would know it's not actually "unbelievable" that's just an adjective he used but clearly you don't know anything about much
@-108-15 күн бұрын
@@raz4371 But I IS educated! I really is!
@KSCPMark674215 күн бұрын
No, it's a fake video. The drone would have been obliterated by the pressure. It doesn't move at all
@cabanford15 күн бұрын
Did you say: Rostov on Drone? 😊
@bigblue691715 күн бұрын
That was nearly a Frogfoot on Drone.
@dennisyoung463115 күн бұрын
Yes, and this is the second time I’ve heard him say that today!😊
@suchomimus992115 күн бұрын
New name for the city
@mattydare15 күн бұрын
@cabanford And on other vids. Funny eh👍
@mattydare15 күн бұрын
@@bigblue6917 Brill. made me smile🤣
@Lekt0r15 күн бұрын
I too myself, was debating for past few days if it was real or fake, however I decided to take it for real as: - Lighting and colour of the jet matches with the surroundings - Drone shows close object warning when jet is meters away - People says drone would be blown away and yes, because it was, sucho pointed it out, check how quickly drone descended after the jets pass - Some say engines thrust would down the drone if not the speed of the aircraft itself but that's incorrect as engines are pointed up to keep the jet ascending during the turn ;) - You can see the camera gets shook when it passes - Condensation on the wings and fumes from the jet are hard to replicate so perfectly, biggest giveaway for me
@____________________________.x15 күн бұрын
There’s no brown in the reflection, and the jets brown exhaust seems to cling to the jet like it was attached, it even passes to the right of the drone like there was no source point on the left. It’s a lot of effort to fake all of this, but I’ve seen very convincing fakes of UFOs and orbs before
@JarrodFrates13 күн бұрын
The Su-25 doesn't have thrust vectoring. The exhaust direction doesn't change relative to the engine alignment.
@Hereford164212 күн бұрын
If you watch frame by frame there is no motion blur whatsoever. The speed with which the camera would have to be grabbing frames to make that a reality is quite impossible. You can check yourself if you pause the video and then use . and , keys to step through. So many people here just really want to believe.
@Lekt0r12 күн бұрын
@@Hereford1642 I'd say too many people are fixated on it, whether its true or not it does not change much, actually bold statement but i'd feel amazed if I was wrong, because such CGI would be top tier
@____________________________.x12 күн бұрын
Odd, my comment was removed. I noticed the exhaust was clinging to the airframe and then jumped to the right side of the drone as it passed. Looks more like it was placed there as a flat texture rather than being created by the plane
@sortaspicey927815 күн бұрын
I like how even the operators are like holy shit what did I just see?
@surters15 күн бұрын
Fantastic stabilizer!!!
@-108-15 күн бұрын
CGI has a tendency to be amazing in that regard. lol
@raz437115 күн бұрын
@@-108- You're so delusional and isolated you've completely disconnected from reality. Educate yourself and you wouldn't be so ignorant.
@raz437115 күн бұрын
@@-108- you're completely disconnected from reality 😂😂
@-108-15 күн бұрын
@@raz4371 You are among the most gullible people in the world. 😂🤣
@raz437115 күн бұрын
@@-108- Yea me and 7 billion other people. 💛💙
@jaytoor508815 күн бұрын
Drone Operator: 😱
@ruger841215 күн бұрын
SU operators 💩
@bigblue691715 күн бұрын
And the pilot 😬
@M1A2Abrams.19-9O12 күн бұрын
You can even see them just sit there and look around slowly as well
@logangoulet752211 күн бұрын
@@ruger8412 more like: did I see that right!?😂
@migproductions404515 күн бұрын
Your geolocation is MAGIC! 😊
@suchomimus992115 күн бұрын
Cheers. This wasn't done by me. Blinzka on twitter
@lifevest115 күн бұрын
In the midwest USA we refer to this as “ope gonna sneak right past ya!”
@sortaspicey927815 күн бұрын
😂
@timcheeseman295615 күн бұрын
Seems only a matter of time until someone figures out how to modify the dji to make them fighter hunters
@virtual215215 күн бұрын
Yes. Skynet is waiting, after all.
@saltmerchant74915 күн бұрын
Caution: wake turbulance!
@NorthernChev15 күн бұрын
...or not. Weird how the drone wasn't affected at all. I mean, c'mon, that jet creates a hell of a wake when it goes by.
@NotFound-sm9rg15 күн бұрын
@@NorthernChev it got dropped by a lot
@spaztor772315 күн бұрын
@@NotFound-sm9rg is was already dropping, but hey this one is tricky ither way
@andyjennings1512 күн бұрын
@@NorthernChev it dropped around 60 feet though you just couldn't tell
@Stefan_Kawalec15 күн бұрын
That's a good ad for DJI drones. The stabilization in incredible.
@fahey571912 күн бұрын
Incredible as in fake.
@TheGreatSteve15 күн бұрын
An aerial mine could be made to work like this.
@Hayman196915 күн бұрын
How that drone remain stable in flight and not be pushed by the turbulence baffles me. Amazing video thanks for the updates.
@KSCPMark674215 күн бұрын
It's because it's comletely fake
@raz437115 күн бұрын
thats because the drone camera has its own resolution and lenses and that would make the plane look closer than it actually was
@JilynnFurlet15 күн бұрын
Between the drones auto stabilization and the camera stabilization, the view direction hardly changes, but check the altitude readings on the screen: it drops about 19 meters (~62 feet) in just two or three seconds. I'd like to see it do that by it's own power. Perhaps some actual pilot of a similar model drone can tell us if that would be possible or not.
@WW5RM15 күн бұрын
@@JilynnFurlet The screen recording looks just like my Mavic 3 which is DJI Fly app. DJI specs say the Mavic 3 can drop 6 m/sec. Plus it uses a barometric sensor for altitude up that high and im not sure how accurate it is. Its most accurate sensor is the downward sensor but its range stops at 59feet / 18m. I just find it hard to believe its real. Although some comments say the SU-25 has directional thrusters (thrust vectoring?) to help it turn and might be why it survived. Ive flown mine in 30mph (rated for 28mph) wind and it seemed fine but you could tell it was working its butt off to stay stable! Cut my flight time drastically! If its fake its the best fake ive seen though!
@Breznak15 күн бұрын
@@JilynnFurletI'm only rated on Matrice 600 but I guess it could drop 20m in three seconds (it's much heavier though).
@MartinSheckelstorm15 күн бұрын
Permission for Fly By Tower....
@bigblue691715 күн бұрын
Do you mean the Su-25 or the drone.
@MartinSheckelstorm15 күн бұрын
@@bigblue6917 probably the Su25, drone was stationary doing it's own thing..
@PalisadeFence15 күн бұрын
Negative. The pattern is full.
@MartinSheckelstorm15 күн бұрын
@@PalisadeFence ☕😯
@user-gf1yg6nj1v13 күн бұрын
Total BS… the jet wash would have trashed that drone…
@michaelwittkopp337915 күн бұрын
Imagine a drone operator; becoming a flying ace... a modern Ukrainian version of the Red Baron. Then we'd have Russian Snoopys to go along with the Russian Scooby Doo buses.
@fahey571912 күн бұрын
Ukrainians already did that. Google Ghost of Kiev. As fake as this videos
@mattz123015 күн бұрын
Now there's a sad word. ALMOST
@gimigimi129915 күн бұрын
And the Mavic did not even blink😮
@andrewgray522015 күн бұрын
A great ad for Mavic
@gimigimi129915 күн бұрын
@@andrewgray5220 I am not an expert, but basic physics from primary school tells me that anything so close to that flyby will be blown away..
@andrewgray522015 күн бұрын
@@gimigimi1299 It was blown away... it dropped 19 metres very quickly.
@pabmargera9 күн бұрын
CGI, set video at 0.25x and you can see the layers cuts from edition. The drone records at 4k at 30 FPS, soo It is impossible to record something at that speed without motion blur.
@3zxcomas8 күн бұрын
It was screen recording, only the final product is 4k 30fps
@pabmargera5 күн бұрын
@@3zxcomas Nope, is the info about settings recording from the drone.
@brianbates78669 күн бұрын
The SU-25 is a flying tank, I imagine the pilot wouldn't have felt much if it collided.
@SaturnusDK15 күн бұрын
Rostov-On-Drone 😀 Nice slip up there.
@thebbqbandito286815 күн бұрын
Literally a battlefield 4 moment.
@user-dz8zk4bf2i15 күн бұрын
Exhaust and turbulence from a jet can take out a small airplane.
@jakeaurod15 күн бұрын
Just ask Goose.
@ArKritz8415 күн бұрын
Depends on the jet though, doesn't it? A large widebody airliner like the Boeing 777 can have more than 10x the thrust of a CAS aircraft like Su-25 or A-10.
@croc50115 күн бұрын
Oh if the operator just moved the drone a bit more to the left and a bit up.
@thiefsleef675215 күн бұрын
SU-25 would still be okay, its been proven to be a beafy plane
@trog798615 күн бұрын
@@thiefsleef6752the only way it could realistically damage that aircraft would be the engine inlets. The chances of that are slim to say the least, but possible
@croc50115 күн бұрын
@@thiefsleef6752 it’s still would receive some minor damage though
@AdrianOkay11 күн бұрын
@@trog7986 the mavic weighs 700gr, you only need to get close enough to the inlet for the drone to be sucked in, and the turbine inside is not gonna like it, it may land safely back at base but that plane is gonna remain grounded for a long while
@davidandre802911 күн бұрын
So you’re telling me that a jet that produce big turbulences that could damage other planes behind him will not knock down a little drone that only weighs 1Kg. It’s nonsense. Also the Su-25 is way too clean it’s 100% CGI!
@admiralzero268511 күн бұрын
I replayed the clip several times, idk why, but something didn't feel right..
@davidjones638915 күн бұрын
The Mavic seems like a stable platform.
@wesc675515 күн бұрын
Cue the ignorant trolls' comments about the oh-so-skilled Su pilot. Eyeroll.
@raz437115 күн бұрын
some dude is trying to claim its CGI 🤣😂
@RedFail1-115 күн бұрын
It 100% is
@raz437115 күн бұрын
@@RedFail1-1 😂😂🤡
@EEX9762315 күн бұрын
@@raz4371there’s trolls who claim most footage of anything involving Russian incompetence or Ukrainian success is either AI of CGI 😂
@bullshitdepartment12 күн бұрын
I mean, flying at that altitude must be pretty hard tbh. That's extremely low to the ground
@aerialbugsmasher15 күн бұрын
To all the morons saying this is CGI, I fly RC aircraft as a hobby, and while I've dabbled briefly in drones due to my preference for traditional fixed wing planes, I can certify that even those not meant as video platforms and with no stabilization for the camera itself are extremely stable even in the turbulence and winds . The motor controllers for some drones can calculate inputs 100000x a second. Dedicated video platforms like the DJI drones have stabilization for the camera itself on top of that as well, so short of hitting one with a baseball bat, these things are always rock solid. The wake turbulence made it drop significantly though it's subtle. Had this been a fixed wing drone, it would've been knocked out of the sky from the wake turbulence alone. But don't take my word for it, there's thousands of videos right here on the tubes showing quad drones completely stable in hurricanes and very near tornadoes. It's actually why I don't enjoy flying them anymore, they feel too video-gamey to me. You still get the challenge of winds and turbulence with traditional line-of-sight fixed-wing RC planes.
@hardtackbeans979015 күн бұрын
You won't teach the trolls much. They get paid to read their scripts. No matter how many facts you give them.
@JeffRL195615 күн бұрын
How many actual, for-real, 1/1 jet fighters have flown past one of your toys that fast and that close? I'll put the over-under at less than zero. . And what the hell does "made it drop significantly though it's subtle" mean? Was it significant or was it subtle? . It doesn't matter if the calculations are made a million times a second if the power to move the drone to counteract the wake turbulence doesn't react as quickly. . The wake turbulence of an Su-25 going that fast that close is considerably more than a hit from a baseball bat and what you forgot, Sparky, is a baseball hit is ONE impact. A wake vortex lasts longer and it keeps moving as it follows the aircraft. It doesn't keep up with it, but that vortex is still moving past the drone after the jet has gone and the vortex is expanding, too. . Facts. They can demolish any nonsense as long as people are willing to open their damn eyes and see reality. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
@jonathanpfeffer371614 күн бұрын
@@JeffRL1956yeah no you’re right, the Ukrainians must have invested tens of thousands into contacting a top grade animation studio to fake a video of 😱😱😱a plane flying by…what a huge propoganda win
@cadennorris96013 күн бұрын
@@JeffRL1956Refuse to see what? Do you actually think this is CGI?
@pabmargera9 күн бұрын
@@cadennorris960 Is CGI
@fabianschrotter15 күн бұрын
Alternative title: “Russian Su-25 almost destroyed by a Ukrainian Mavic drone!”
@bigblue691715 күн бұрын
Seeing how close the drone was to the Su-25s air intake that would have been highly likely.
@TikhonT.15 күн бұрын
NAFO title
@santigocortez464715 күн бұрын
That's how Ukrainians are ''winning' all the time .
@Raspukek-fu8un15 күн бұрын
🤡
@cameronspence497714 күн бұрын
@@TikhonT.Cope
@ArcticVXR115 күн бұрын
You know full well that drone operator was ducking for his life even though he was nowhere near the drone hahaha even i was to be honest. Great little clip
@surters15 күн бұрын
And Sanath has thawed up again, gratz, I was worried after we saw in a snowstorm.
@sanathdemel362115 күн бұрын
Yes )) but I am a bit sick )) all bunged up ))
@DominikGentener15 күн бұрын
Thanks to all the people who are supporting this amazing fundraiser.
@jlo777015 күн бұрын
60 billion dollars... hmm makes ya wonder where that money is going
@tibor123414 күн бұрын
@@jlo7770 me too.
@lentar11 күн бұрын
@@jlo7770 they make russians go 2 meters under ground
@dmytrobibik136611 күн бұрын
@@jlo7770 your money goes into your pocket if you producing and working, we dont shooting dollars we shooting ammo its easy
@jlo777011 күн бұрын
@@dmytrobibik1366 lmfao "you're shooting" millions of dollars of my tax money
@JK-zx3go15 күн бұрын
Wow
@Billhatestheinternet14 күн бұрын
This near miss (and I'm sure it has happened many more times around the world) brings up a possibility. If low flying aircraft are spotted in the area, could a swarm of drones be sent up to mimic the effect of barge balloons in WW1 and WW2? That would be a hell of a cheap way (versus MANPADS or even more significant kit) to take down an aircraft, not to mention Ukraine is able to supply a lot more units with drones than actual AA weapons. The drone itself would probably cause enough damage (especially if ingested into the turbines) to down the aircraft; put a simple hand grenade on it and it would virtually guarantee a kill, regardless of where it hit the aircraft. And quadcopters are so small that it would be virtually impossible to detect their presence with RADAR, and there would be no warning from onboard threat detection (as is the case with an IR or RADAR guided missile threat). So unless the pilot is able to visually identify something as small as a robin, maybe no bigger than a hawk, while flying at 400 knots, the pilot would be totally screwed.
@damianketcham15 күн бұрын
Wow!!! I bet the pilot was thinking “WTF was that???”.
@NorthernChev15 күн бұрын
...bet the pilot didn't even see it at 800 MPH.
@soupfork210515 күн бұрын
Pilot was very likely looking half ahead, half down to the right and never saw it.
@NorthernChev15 күн бұрын
@@soupfork2105 Yeah, this was a complete coincidence. Pilot never saw it. In a turn like that you're looking up and to the right. Not under you.
@vegas1a15 күн бұрын
Funny thing is that the pilot has by now seen the video and had to make a quick change of underwear.......
@mebymyself281615 күн бұрын
@@vegas1a Pity it wasn't the underside of his parachute.
@anadin061215 күн бұрын
Thank you good sir
@brianv198815 күн бұрын
The camera was also zoomed in a tiny bit so it probably wasn't that close but close enough to do some turbulence but very little
@agoogleuseranonymous265814 күн бұрын
I don't know. It would have obliterated the drone for sure. But SU-25 ... that thing is built like a tank to withstands couple MANPAD hits.
@DougguoD15 күн бұрын
0:13 Oh yeah, rewatching I can see the other 2 here ✅
@barbaramassey378715 күн бұрын
💙💛💙💛💙
@user-tf4lk4fm7i8 күн бұрын
Ukraine is losing grandma
@mh-ht2fp14 күн бұрын
Aye bro watch your jet. Watch your jet bro. Watch your jet!
@uavr128615 күн бұрын
The Su-25s are turning hard to starboard, so it's likely they were flying west towards the front line soon before this clip. I'm curious what the red warning that flashed up at the top of the drone screen means.
@bigblue691715 күн бұрын
That's the Ooooh Shiiiit warning light.
@tudogeo706115 күн бұрын
"Navigation systems something something"
@nehalemxtv533115 күн бұрын
Navigation system failure. There is no GPS on those drones for safety reasons
@Errr71715 күн бұрын
That was the Mavic warning about an object near by. It's used for collision avoidance.
@cmtwgrdk274815 күн бұрын
@@nehalemxtv5331 it does have gps,,, that how it knows how far from the controller it is, also the display shows a sattelite icon, and how good the reception is, it does show two out of maybe five
@beachbum7797915 күн бұрын
What??? The ruzzian Su25 missed in it's attempt to intercept a Mavic drone?
@yumichow437510 күн бұрын
The Mavic drone is so stable!!
@ClannerJake15 күн бұрын
well, yes, gyros, it has lots of those; but the camera sensor isn't fully used to take footage, only a part of it, to minimize shaking and what not the camera uses software to float the frame of view around the sensors field of view. thats how we we from dashcams looking like earthquakes to being buttery smooth, same with handhelds. nasa technology, if i remember correctly.
@physetermacrocephalus220915 күн бұрын
Thats nuts.
@jaco5five6six10 күн бұрын
was that the jets health bar that popped up at the top?🤣🤣i play too many video games
@toonverberg131315 күн бұрын
Cool footage!
@timmommens90115 күн бұрын
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@JZsBFF15 күн бұрын
We're one step away from introducing barrage drones.
@Dasistrite12 күн бұрын
This and the russian pilot playing battlefield in real life are like tho most crazy videos ive seen yet!
@stevecarlisle734115 күн бұрын
I love the way he takes a pause before Ukrainian place names, then pronounces it in a wool accent.
@jamesjross15 күн бұрын
does that look like ground to air in the background?
@thanhnguyen-xi8fq15 күн бұрын
No, the camera of the drone was in zoom mode, it may still 50-60m from the Su25. Otherwise for such a close passing by, the drone would be stumbled.
@alejoquiroga936912 күн бұрын
Nadie presta atención el ángulo de visión del dron, está mirando por debajo de la línea horizontal, supongamos que tenía puesto la cámara en modo zoom (que daría la impresión de estar más cerca), la perspectiva del dron realmente estaría ubicado más a la izquierda y más arriba de dónde se ve el video y hubiese terminado dentro de uno de los motores del Sukhoi. Es falso.
@jimsack115 күн бұрын
Rostov on Don, not Rostov on Drone. Cute.
@JohnWerner-te5zy15 күн бұрын
Rostov-on-Don Trump
@nickzwa15 күн бұрын
If Maverick was flying this Mavic, there never would have been a flat spin and Goose never would have died.
@markmonaghan230915 күн бұрын
One of those fishing magnets would be interesting attached to a drone.
@Anderten198915 күн бұрын
Looks like in a movie :D
@deecee152215 күн бұрын
Shame on Russia
@Spazzfrom.198915 күн бұрын
for what? not supporting western coups?
@dawggonevidz914015 күн бұрын
@@Spazzfrom.1989 name checks out. hey mate. where do you live? good people who hate traitors want to know.
@imc2000715 күн бұрын
@@Spazzfrom.1989 You probs live in west XD
@user-McGiver15 күн бұрын
@@Spazzfrom.1989 'nough talking boy... it started...!
@TikhonT.15 күн бұрын
@@dawggonevidz9140 Threats to someone for having a different opinion than yours, how very NAFO like
@Skanking-Corpse13 күн бұрын
This gives me an idea of using drones to mine the air space. If you know planes are around you send them up in mass formations, maybe you could even make them solar powered.
@prjndigo15 күн бұрын
It looks so close but the plane missed by more than 7 feet.
@armchairwanderer128715 күн бұрын
👍🇺🇦🇺🇦👍
@sotirzvanidjubre410913 күн бұрын
Yup...Sukhoi engines wouldn't blow it and launch it to space LoL
@syedhussainalishah110410 күн бұрын
Badass fighter jets and pilots
@rocroc15 күн бұрын
So, was this a purposeful flyby or incidental?
@GeorgePerry-jc4gf15 күн бұрын
i believe it was from the 'jet wash' mate
@NorthForkFisherman13 күн бұрын
Almost scored an air-to-air with that drone.
@josephking651515 күн бұрын
During our flight training 40+ years ago we were told if we hit a 1lb or it may have been a 1kg seagull at our cruise speed of 90kts it would have an impact force of *1.2 tonnes.* If the drone had been ingested into the jet intake the engine would have been toast and if it had been the starboard engine then it may have caused a nice yaw towards the ground. At that height AGL it could have resulted in orc jam across Ukraine. I would imagine it was well outside the seat ejection envelope at that very high bank angle and *G* forces.
@contemporarymonk11 күн бұрын
You can continue to imagine. That's all you can do, since the SU 25 is fitted zvesda k-36, a zero-zero ejection seat.
@ikuona8 күн бұрын
The pressure difference would snap the plastic in tiny pieces
@TheKievKen15 күн бұрын
Did he say “Rostov on Drone”? 😂
@greenlichtie157015 күн бұрын
Wow that was nuts
@dontsupportrats408915 күн бұрын
I have a mavic and a dji. Both camera's have amazing stability. You can use them and do quite alot of tricks and the camera will not even show it. And these are off the shelve drones from 2020 (cvd hobby)
@441rider12 күн бұрын
A Mavic is a DJI. FYI
@dontsupportrats408912 күн бұрын
@@441rider One is black and says mavic on it the other white and says dji. I'm guessing one is a brand name or model name the other manufacturer name?
@441rider12 күн бұрын
@@dontsupportrats4089 DJI stated with NAZA controllers and the quad was called a Flame wheel, Mavic is just the branding name like DJI phantom, Mavic, Mavic mini etc. Mavic is a heavyish lift camera drone.
@haigplague15 күн бұрын
That's wild!
@darubicon150115 күн бұрын
@ 1:34 "Rostov on Drone" 😊
@s9juvolzrebuilt98414 күн бұрын
In the end of the drone´s video, you can see the smoke trails from the unguided rockets fired by the other pair of SU´s, so they were ideed doing close air support on the front lines.
@rubenskiii15 күн бұрын
Mavic? Maverick!
@beartastic-ftw15 күн бұрын
I guess that pilot gets court marshalled for failing to successfully intercept the mavic..
@user-tf4lk4fm7i8 күн бұрын
I guess the pilot still doesn't know that he even flew past a drone.
@ryushogun989011 күн бұрын
There was even a health bar as he passed through.
@Wayne72LEVRAI13 күн бұрын
How do you know that this is an ukrainian drone ? When you ear the reaction they seem to be amused by the situation. The video come from a russian telegram.
@dski24789 күн бұрын
Plus the on-screen language is Russian
@chrismitchell462215 күн бұрын
Now that's a new form of AA
@john845114 күн бұрын
Really? The pressure wave from a plane that close and that fast would almost certainly send that drone spinning out of control. No image stabilisation ever designed would correct that! I suspect that this is an optics aberration making the plane look a lot closer than it actually was.
@mikegaruda427013 күн бұрын
Flying at 50 meters above ground on a real battlefield… Russian are crazies as hell, real fighters.
@TheHandThatBites15 күн бұрын
Mad one that
@kilianortmann997915 күн бұрын
Looks like it was armed with S-8 rocket pods and KMGU subminitions dispensers.
@Nobody015212 күн бұрын
I wonder what the @CorridorCrew will say about this one. Personally I feel like the jet looks a bit too high quality, not sure what it is but maybe it's the odd lack of motion blur.
@mortshare703715 күн бұрын
That looks like a constructed video, the quality it too high as the plane gets close, plus no turbulence.
@andrewgray522015 күн бұрын
What do you suppose caused the drone to suddenly drop 19 metres when the plane went by?
@Urmza11 күн бұрын
Its not a partner, its a wingman.
@UncleJoeLITE15 күн бұрын
Frogfoots always out-trump the Mavic. 💛⚓💙
@svenvanwier71964 күн бұрын
would be some damage, but would probably survive judging based on past happenings.
@Alligator9957 күн бұрын
O:33 - 0:34 Why destroyer sligtly slide on video ?
@zaarkwark15 күн бұрын
SU25 are quite tough though, airframe is partly titanium I think.
@user-tf4lk4fm7i8 күн бұрын
It's similar to an A10 and made to take a few hits, even from manpads. Most CAS aircraft are made like this.
@MarcoInaros-ns7ut12 күн бұрын
He was no near that craft ,the camera zoomed ,if it was that drone would have been sent flying away,nice video noneless
@DOI_ARTS14 күн бұрын
It didn't flinch!
@darkninjacorporation15 күн бұрын
If that was a FPV drone I would’ve flinched so hard lmao. Pants: shit
@stalkerslayer120911 күн бұрын
Why my brain says; it's a CGI brother, bro it's not a CGI!!
@KhanAitmatov203315 күн бұрын
If real, then this is one for the history book for sure
@blankpage55515 күн бұрын
unreal
@SwarmerBees15 күн бұрын
A stinger missile weighs only 10kg. Unfortunately, sustained flight times with that kind of load is low. Engineering in time can bring that curve down, balancing lower weight against effective kill with lower weight drone borne aa systems. Fortunately, Ukraine now has access to the kind of R&D funding needed to roll their own solutions.
@terrencesauve15 күн бұрын
Yikes the RF airplanes are coming really close to the front lines!
@yomauser15 күн бұрын
Those always operate at that distance, only on western media they stopped.