Games : Assassin's Creed Mirage - 0:21 Alan Wake 2 - 1:25 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:26 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077 Starfield - 3:33 Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 4:35 GTA 5 - 5:32 Forza Horizon 5 - 6:41 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5 Red Dead Redemption 2 - 7:42 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2 PUBG - 8:45 System: Windows 11 Ryzen 7 8700G - bit.ly/4899w9X MSI MPG X670E CARBON G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV GeForce GTX 1060 6GB - bit.ly/3lEMa5G SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
@howsikl85947 ай бұрын
Could you do this request Some games in igpu like sekiro in all the settings or any old games which has a recommendation gtx series would be helpful to buy a card
@existent11947 ай бұрын
why amd didnt make ps5 igpu for sale?
@GiacomBono7 ай бұрын
Definetly not time to switch to this iGPU, still pricy and overall expensive system!!!!...
@مقارناتالجيوش7 ай бұрын
@bryannicedov71157 ай бұрын
Por que Alan wake va tan mal?
@shadowlemon697 ай бұрын
That's impressive, but an i3-12100F RX 6600 combo can easily double the performance of the 8700G. While being cheaper or equal in price.
@ArnikoGiri7 ай бұрын
yeah, but you could also get the Ryzen 5 8600G for a lot cheaper and just slightly less performance. With the intel setup, you can't upgrade that. But with the AMD setup, you can easily pop in a future X3D CPU without changing the motherboard and add a GPU too. Literally what I did with my current setup.
@tskraj31907 ай бұрын
It's comparing an integrated APU to a CPU with a discrete graphics card. An APU is a lot less money.
@rahuloberoi97397 ай бұрын
More like triple or quadruple the performance
@rahuloberoi97397 ай бұрын
@@tskraj3190Wdym? i3 and 6600 combo is way cheaper.
@tskraj31907 ай бұрын
@@rahuloberoi9739 Not according to Newegg, They're about the same.
@TestingGames7 ай бұрын
in some games the igpu was not signed correctly in the overlay itself, the correct name is Radeon 780M
@playbackstorage930317 күн бұрын
C.PWR and G.PWR are the same, is it the overall value or should we summarize it?
@gamingoptimized7 ай бұрын
Finally GTX 1060 performance on an APU!
@jarkid7 ай бұрын
Yes
@mrdali677 ай бұрын
@@jarkid But the 1060 is still 30% more power efficient, and it's kinda funny that it does 50% better in some of the older less advanced games than the newer tech RDNA3 graphics
@p3dropr7 ай бұрын
@@mrdali67 no, that power consumption is gpu + cpu, look the power consumption of the 8700g with the 1060 and with the igpu, is the double because they are both, just that they are repeated
@DTHPR5427 ай бұрын
@@mrdali67 You still need cou with gtx 1060
@mrdali677 ай бұрын
@@DTHPR542 errmm . you always need a cpu .. whats your point ? you also need ram, an sdd a case and psu 😆
@efetosun7 ай бұрын
Good results for integrated GPU. But the GTX 1060 proves why it has been at the top on Steam for long periods of time in the past. In terms of performance per watt, it was a great card for its time.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
They're fake numbers. Not the first time he's done it. Check Tech Yes City's review if you don't believe me.
@Arctic-catfish6 ай бұрын
because other GPU are so expensive
@SalamaAhmed-pj3jv4 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7 Ram's speed can make a difference since integrated GPUs rely only on RAM
@olnnn7 ай бұрын
Seems there's a pretty drastic difference between titles using DX12/vulkan and titles using DX11, in the former the performance is on par but in the latter the difference is large.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
These are fake numbers. Check TechYesCity and GN's reviews. The 8700g's is at least 40% slower than the 1060. I cannot believe how many people this guy has already brainwashed.
@UKKNGaming7 ай бұрын
he gimped it it does not have enough ram lol
@UmmerFarooq-wx4yo6 ай бұрын
@@UKKNGaming 32gb ram?
@diamonshade74846 ай бұрын
Dx11 likes nvidia way more
@NazwatonazwaАй бұрын
not at all igpu probably wasn't fully optimized for older engines etc
@robertopazsoldan96417 ай бұрын
Finally we enter in a new era remenber this in 5 years an igpu with the performance of 4060ti
@PineyJustice7 ай бұрын
Actually strix halo will have 4070 super performance, it won't be available as a desktop socketable cpu though. That should be out later this year or early next year.
@cultphoenix18397 ай бұрын
And that apu 's cost will exceed the total cost of i5 14600k and 4080 combined
@NadeemAhmed-nv2br7 ай бұрын
@@cultphoenix1839true, it's for thin and lights and will be in thin and light ultra premium laptops
@Eric-ct2ri7 ай бұрын
@@PineyJustice if its not available for the desktop than it doesnt matter.
@Eric-ct2ri7 ай бұрын
in 5 years they might match the gtx1080. and an igpu with 4060ti performance in 5 years wouldnt be great eitherway it would be 2 to 3 gens behind still. since by that time 60 or 70 series might be out.
@user-bw8xk2dd8u7 ай бұрын
Это самое интересное сравнение за последнее время! Я его да же смотрел до конца, в отличае от сравнений rtx vs rx, rtx vs rtx...
@Pa36ouHuK7 ай бұрын
а что интересного то? 7840hs уже давно вышел и было понятно что это тоже самое (ну может +5%).
@skalar79877 ай бұрын
@@Pa36ouHuK интересен сам факт технологического процесса. Сроду бы не подумал, что когда-то встройку будут сравнивать с легендарной старушкой gtx 1060 6gb.
@user-bw8xk2dd8u7 ай бұрын
@@Pa36ouHuK, давно не было сравнений встройки и дескреток, последнее - 5700ge и 1050, а тут уже с 1060. Если выпустят встройку, способную конкурировать с 1070, то лично у меня отпадëт надобность в дескретной видеокарте!
@Pa36ouHuK7 ай бұрын
@@user-bw8xk2dd8uТак графика 780m уже то терафлопсам соответствует GTX 1080, но ее сильно ограничивает подсистема памяти. А 4х каналов в массовом сегменте пока не предвидится. Пока тупик.
@tr00per377 ай бұрын
@@Zullia042 еще бы цена соответствовала интересам сборки "игровой машины" с интегрированной графикой. а так - "гиковские мини-пк" пока что в выигрыше
@selohcin7 ай бұрын
It's clear that the 8700G is being held back considerably in some games by the RAM's bandwidth. It may not be practical, but using DDR5-7200 or higher would result in at least 20% better performance than what we saw here.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
The benchmark's fake.
@selohcin7 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7 No, it looks very real. This guy has been doing reliable tests for more than a decade, so I'd be surprised if you could prove this one is a fake.
@tileeq4 ай бұрын
Latency comes into play above 6400 speed
@EXOWill7 ай бұрын
About 2 years ago I built a system centered around the 5700G. I built the system for a lady that mainly used it for data storage and very mild gaming. The 5700G had some good reviews around that time. But this 8700G is impressive to me, while running side by side with one of the most popular budget GPU's. AMD is not too far away from a mid-range solution.
@donoturnback7 ай бұрын
Lol $500 isn't mid range for just CPU and a motherboard
@EXOWill6 ай бұрын
@@donoturnback Just wait a few months for the prices to fall in line.
@traelkel87894 ай бұрын
@@donoturnbackuna CPU que aguanta hasta una 4070 ti super
@EnreL-7 ай бұрын
best apu for mini itx build❤
@jarkid7 ай бұрын
Yes
@Thejacketof-huang7 ай бұрын
Best 💩 of 💩 inefficient, noob ignorant AMT a r d! This 💩 run worse then and absorb more then 1060 from 2016. Wake up sub human fanboy AMDickdumautism
@Thejacketof-huang7 ай бұрын
@@jarkid yes what, ignorant!
@jarkid7 ай бұрын
@@Thejacketof-huang yes is yes, you are a naysayer.
@tr00per377 ай бұрын
mini-pc just existing...
@-Burs7 ай бұрын
Wow! It's impressive how far have iGPU's come. Now there's really no point in buying low-tier dedicated graphics cards.
@magim20397 ай бұрын
you misspelled the 780M again in thumbnail
@TestingGames7 ай бұрын
Oh shit, you're right
@nafian_n7 ай бұрын
@@TestingGames i would like to see gtx 1650 super vs 8700g
@siyzerix7 ай бұрын
The 65w 8700g + rx780m seems to be about on par with the 50w gtx 1650 g6 on laptops. A 45w rtx 4050 + 25w ryzen 7 7840hs would double the rx780m's performance, if not more, and the 25w 7840hs wouldn't be far off the 8700g's CPU perf. The 1060 also doesn't support a lot of the newer features as well, so thats probably why in older titles it has larger leads.
@NivrA_Benchmark7 ай бұрын
I appreciate the effort you put into making this video. Well done!
@zaitrel_25yt657 ай бұрын
It's impressive how much the integrated graphics have improved
@hercultop38533 ай бұрын
I am waiting for a time when Apu graphic can reach atleast rtx 2060 performance!
@asdprogram7 ай бұрын
wow, and I believe you could've pushed it even further by using faster ram sticks and maybe even overclocking a little bit.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
The benchmark is fake. See Tech Yes City's review
@DeepteshLovesTECH7 ай бұрын
APUs make little sense in the world of PCs for gaming. It's impractical and expensive.
@Atrumoris7 ай бұрын
Unless you're trying to build your PC in a super compact ITX case. Or maybe you're saving up for a dedicated card and you need something to get you by in the meantime.
@theplayerofus3197 ай бұрын
saving up argument makes no sense.... you buy a expensive apu and destroy its usecase later on haha. just get a 7500f and a rx 6600. and itx builds are like 0,0011 % of people @@Atrumoris
@Atrumoris7 ай бұрын
Keep bringing counterarguments all you want. The number of people that are spending extra on their CPUs just because they include APUs is vast, and that fact stands firm. As to why, well there are certainly many more reasons than the two I listed above. You go and try to figure them out.
@theplayerofus3197 ай бұрын
@@Atrumoris they do this because its just useful to have it as backup for encoding or error search... 99% dont want it to game or that heavy of tasks. Keep wishing for a usecase LOL. Hardware unboxed said it right: if you really think about it, its usecase at this price is more than limited
@arenzricodexd44097 ай бұрын
@@Atrumoris rather than going with APU and add discrete gpu later just go straight to cpu+ discrete gpu. Ryzen 3600/5600 + RX6600 is a better choice anyday over something like 8700G.
@FrostarmyN77 ай бұрын
Back when it launched in 2016, the GTX 1060 was a card that can play everything on high settings at FHD and even QHD in some cases! The 1000 series in overall were a big leap compared to the 900 and it will probably be the only mistake NVIDIA will make in launching GPUs at a decent price. Personally, I think that the 1060 was the best from the lines in terms of price/performance and it was also the most used in gaming setups until a few years back. I jumped back then from a 9800 GT to a GTX 1060 (ASUS Turbo version) and I was blown away when I launched The Witcher 3 at 3440 x 1440 and it ran fluently. It stings me a bit now to see it on par with an APU, but technology must evolve so it will remain in my memories (and collection) as one of the best cards for its time.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
These are fake numbers. He's been doing this for years. Check TechYesCity's review if you don't believe me. Testing games is a charlatan who fake's numbers.
@FrostarmyN77 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7 I have also checked TechYesCity and RandomGaminginHD's (R7 7840HS) reviews as well as Daniel Owen's one on the R7 7940HS. The latter CPU seems to be closer to the 1060. I can't be 100% sure whether it is fake or not, but what is certain is that APUs are getting closer to its relative performance and this variant beats at least the GTX 1050 Ti in most recent titles. Drivers could also be the reason as to why this is true, but it is what it is.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
@@FrostarmyN7 Check tom's hardware and GN. Just watch closely because they mixed 720p benchmarks in the same charts as the 1080p to confuse noobs.
@FrostarmyN77 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7 Okay, thanks for the information! I watched the GN video on the CPU as well!
@lenardpr7 ай бұрын
On the Radeon side, it has G.PWR AND C.PWR. Are they the same or do they add up?
@samserious13377 ай бұрын
The same. This is the same chip as in the ROG Ally and it performs 90% with only 35W total.
@lenardpr7 ай бұрын
@@samserious1337 Thank you!
@nurbsivonsirup14163 ай бұрын
Great job! And clearly impressive performance from this iGPU, especially considering the bandwidth constraints compared to a dedicated GPU with 192bit memory bus. However, unless you can get an APU with 780M graphics for no more than 200€, these products are completely redudant for most gamers. Maybe if you're going for a SFF system, but for anyone willing to go even a little bit larger, any cheap 4/6 core CPU with a RX6600 class card will do a much, much better job.
@Jakiyyyyy7 ай бұрын
For efficiency wise this is better but for the price hmm doubted it. Maybe wait for few months for APU gaming only?
@theplayerofus3197 ай бұрын
its hard to find a reason for apu gaming only outside of a laptop/handheld. Get a cheap rx 6600 and ryzen 7500f and it DESTROYS the apu with much better future proof.
@user-bi7wy6qq2o7 ай бұрын
check price for NEW 1060, not refub, not used, not mint, and try again. Stop comparing tesla with you 35y.o. corolla :D
@theplayerofus3197 ай бұрын
@@user-bi7wy6qq2o the 1060 is a 8 year old card. Where exactly do you find New cards? Makes no sense 😂
@AdaptacionGamer7 ай бұрын
the IGPU only consumes 15W, so the two 105W values are from the CPU + the IGPU since they both come from the same circuit
@user-bi7wy6qq2o6 ай бұрын
@@theplayerofus319 So, you can`t even find new one. But you comparing new vs old, comparing apu vs gpu. IDK man, I can compare m2 hdd with cheap rj45. Internet infinite, so rj45 winner. Also cats can chew wires, so total win. ...I looked in my pants, and I found the balls. I will say the new processor is bad, it has gotten worse as a processor because of the cache neuter. ...But the very idea that we're entering a time where the gaming capabilities of a processor with integrated graphics sounds interesting. The 1060 is still the most popular video card in steam. If your CPU doesn't put the 1060 to shreds by putting your cowbell into its D-port, then the graphics on it are a fart in a puddle. Interesting, but it doesn't change anything.
@googlesama2 ай бұрын
This is a cpu I really want because I've had a lot of gpu problems in the past. Using igpu will be much, much less problematic
@prtech78057 ай бұрын
8700G is beast but price tag is no good. Compare with 7th gen ryzen cpu with Separate GPU not enough clock speeds.
@traelkel87894 ай бұрын
Ese no es el problema No es raro que el 8700g rinda apenas un 10% más que el 8600g? Eso es por qué tiene un gran cuello de botella por la memoria ram , no llega a tener el ancho de banda que necesita para sacar todo su poder
@ofon2000Ай бұрын
kinda wonder why there is such a huge difference sometimes. Really 780M is an interesting product...seems like it needs another generation to become a very good thing for PC
You can really see how cpu TDP numbers are just a blatant lie these days. Cooling nearly twice the heat output with even a good tower cooler seems like a problem. Aside from the 4000 series, it looks like power draw numbers really haven't improved much in the last decade.
@jasondelarosa54575 ай бұрын
With same gpu as last gen results are expected. The next gen APU for 9000's series will be another leap.
@jonathanng1387 ай бұрын
Would be great if you tested this on Esport Titles since most people buying this APU would probably be using it for Esport Titles
@SilvioMaranoSMH176 ай бұрын
Ryzen 8700g has 65W TDP, although it is normal to expect divergences from this value, the power draw value shown here is too off to not raise suspicion.
@g4r156 ай бұрын
Based on newegg price, an r5 5600 + rx 6600 will cost you $14 cheaper than the r7 8700g. And the combo will give you more performance too. But if you built a super tiny compact miniscule small pc with no room for a discrete gpu, the r7 8700g is the best option for your build
@alvincalmkid4 ай бұрын
On DX12 gaming 780M looks similar performance compare to GTX 1060, even better in some game. But on older DX11 game, GTX 1060 better, still 780M has good performance
@pcneguinho79856 ай бұрын
in 5 years we'll' have an APU perfoming like a RTX3060
@diamonshade74846 ай бұрын
The console apps perform like a rx 6700
@Stepbackandsee017 ай бұрын
tbh this is actually crazy 😮
@jarkid7 ай бұрын
haha why?
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
Yes it is cause it's fake. Check tech yes city's review and you'll see what i mean.
@traelkel87894 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7de verdad hiciste copia y pega en todos los comentarios?
@traelkel87894 ай бұрын
@@jarkidpor qué si ¿Por qué no sería impresionante?
@7stringguitarplayer4 ай бұрын
@@mesicek7 you shouldnt say a video is fake so easily and hurt the credibility of the content creator unless you really know what your talking about. I just looked at the tech yes city review comparing the 8600g/8700g to the 1060 and none of the games were the same ones being benchmarked in this video, so i have no idea how you came to that conclusion of this benchmark video being fake. and plus the benchmark on that video have some games that are similar percentage wise with this video, for example in tech yes city benchmark balders gate 3 and fortnite at 1080p low had a 25 to 30 percent difference between the 8700g and gtx 1060, and in this video , starfield and avatar had a similar percentage difference. obviously it will vary a lot game to game though depending on how optimized the game is for older or newer architecture.
@lyfhg7 ай бұрын
can you test with fast ddr5 ram
@Crustenscharbap7 ай бұрын
Good video. Sad to see the 120W at the 8700G. You are using the same CPU. So I can see how much engery the Graphics on this APU needs. In Cyberpunk for example about 40W. In Avatar and GTA about 55W. Overall the "old" PC needs about 1/3 more energy and is about 1/4 faster. The APU is not as efficient as I thought. Also a big disadvantages of the iGPUs is the bad optimization in some games. Look at GTA5.
@rickylimanto73726 ай бұрын
you're wrong about the power consumtion. Also it's new APU so you need to wait until it get better optimization. that chip is the same as used in ROG ally. Example: on 1060 side you need to adds cpu+gpu, but on igpu side its only 1 of them cpu or gpu it's tdp compltely the same, just repeated.
@lzMzl6 ай бұрын
@@rickylimanto7372 (The APU) the gpu consumes the same as the cpu usage. or do these have their own individual use?
@rickylimanto73726 ай бұрын
@@lzMzl on the indicator of using APU, you can see the TDP, example cpu 115W and gpu 114W, actually that only consumes 115W, not 115+114, that was only repeated/duplicated info. but on discrete graphic you must add cpu and gpu since both of them physically different
@rickylimanto73726 ай бұрын
@@lzMzl same as cpu, its only duplicated/repeated info
@EhurtAfy5 ай бұрын
Nah I need my CUDA and tensor cores, Nvidia or nothing right now. I think the new AMD apu is very solid for a budget gaming build, a young gamer could manage with no GPU needed
@fx80527 ай бұрын
Работает ли запись видео с помощью AMD ReLive? У меня был 5600g, там этой возможности не было, что довольно печально. А в другом софте для записи очень сильно падала производительность. В этом плане видеокарты лучше, особенно Nvidia. На встроенной графике Intel тоже нет возможности записи видео, без значительной потери производительности. Но ладно производительность, при записи еще и не стабильная работа, постоянные фризы.
@MsRebelleon7 ай бұрын
Не мучай жопу.Купи себе 7500ф и видеокарту за те деньги которые стоит 8700g
@fx80527 ай бұрын
@@MsRebelleon не, я интелбой, просто интересно остается ли амд мусором или нет
@reduxmod40447 ай бұрын
@@fx8052 если ты интел хлам возносишь то не удивительно что для тебя АМД мусор.
@sonesh42077 ай бұрын
I would like a comparison between Ryzen 7 8700G vs i3 14100F+RTX 4060 because for the price of 8700g in india you can get an i3 14100 with a 4060
@arbiter17 ай бұрын
I think there is already reviews with amd gpu near same perf as 4060 and its not pretty for 8700g if it remember right edit: had a look it was i3 12100f with rx 6500 xt and they had 6600 as well which rx6600 is 20% slower then a 4060 and they were 2x higher fps over 8700. you can get away cheaper with i3/rx6500 since you don't need higher speed mem that 8700g needs due to shared mem.
@skywalker19917 ай бұрын
You sure ???? Rtx4060 alone is over $300 and i3 14100f cost another $150. , can't be cheaper than 8700g .
@Cristian-vh5fh7 ай бұрын
Fun fact.. this iGPU offers better graphics than the PS4... It's incredible how fast technology evolves. I'm sure in 6-7 years we will have PS5 performance in an iGPU.
@zaitrel_25yt657 ай бұрын
It's impressive that a graphics card that was once the king of the mid-range now in 2018 now performs similar or sometimes better than a GTX 1060
@diamonshade74846 ай бұрын
Didn't the rx 580 surpass it along time ago
@elalemanpaisa6 ай бұрын
Everyone praising the iGPU would replave entry level gpus yet igpus ate performance wise entry level from 10 years ago.
@ConradCarelandish7 ай бұрын
Suggestion to AMD, make the GPU specs in the APU 4 times as strong and charge X2 as the current price, it will sell like hot cake abd be a huge deal.
@kurohchan55267 ай бұрын
ok so about the humors on PSP 2... it is entirely not impossible.. look at those fps on a APU
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
lol i will break the x3d cache in like 2weeks if such cpu exist
@diegolink422 ай бұрын
I'm actually surprised it runs Alan Wake 2 holy sh!t
@mehmeteng21464 ай бұрын
I'm taking 50-55 fps on Alan wake II with my 1650 super at 1080p low resolution. I wonder how this 1060 6gb takes 12 fps on this game. It seems ridicilous I dont know.
@tausifabir25244 ай бұрын
The resulation and the graphics setting of game is low. So sometimes at low setting the graphics cant produce much fps.if the graphics setting would high then the gtx would easily produce 70+ fps whether the redeon 780m wouldnt get more than 20 fps.but see, everyone is thinking that the redeon 780 is better than gtx 1060. But the reality is gtx is 5x better than the igpu of ryzen
@t.mollov5666 ай бұрын
1:09 CPU is handling the game very well, but why with iGPU it has lower MHZ? with eGPU it stay boosted for longer time.
@fathirks41077 ай бұрын
Try at 7000 Mhz or maybe 8000, is there a significant difference?
@KelvinKMS7 ай бұрын
but you pay like $100+ more for just DDR5- 7200 RAM speed.
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
it will
@uran837 ай бұрын
Make ram 8000 mhz
@maximustitan81717 ай бұрын
Nicely done. Very accurate especally the power draw.
@MARTINREN12316 ай бұрын
i felt it when you mentioned that the 1060 is from 8 years ago. and it hurts.
@erikbritz80954 ай бұрын
*So in short if the Ryzen 5 8600G and Ryzen 7 8700G will all be entry level cpu next gen and could perform like a GTX 1060/RX580 2048sp for about a years time before you upgrade GPU wise?*
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
true, you might be enough w the igpu only and have 110w pc that can game
@MDJpoiki7 ай бұрын
i3 14100F vs i9 9900K please.
@iikon017 ай бұрын
Right now I don't recommend buying it because the price Wait for 6-12 months so the price drop from 330$ to 250$
@howsikl85947 ай бұрын
Yes all we can do is wait but never buy
@flyingjohnson7327 ай бұрын
Cant wait to see r5 5600gt vs 5600g
@Papugod-456Ай бұрын
Creo que ire por el 8600g, ya se que se puede tener mejor rendimiento con menos dinero, pero quiero añadir una 4070ti en un futuro
@Deathdemon657 ай бұрын
Amd never looses and opportunity to loose an opportunity they could have made 8700G with 16 compute units hub made a video and 6500xt beats the 780M for half the price i mean legit half the pricr of a 8700G build you can get better performance with 6500xt and i3 12100f or ryzen 3 3100
@yellowfuntvix14596 ай бұрын
780M vs GTX 1060: Power draw + 100% FPS minus from 2 to 50%
@toms94187 ай бұрын
Not bad for IGP👍
@RB26DETT-x7h7 ай бұрын
in same cost you should have a GPU and a CPU. intel core i3 12400F or amd ryzen 5 4500, 5500 + GPU. nvidia is higher cost than amd, you should choose AMD, near performance but AMD is cheaper.
@baksbany64757 ай бұрын
RAM -- G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz -- NOT GOOD ! Поставь на 8000+ Mhz и тогда встройка 8700G раскроется на полную !!!
@graytracing7 ай бұрын
АМД на AM5 в 90% случаев не заводится с 6000+ частотой.
@blakegriplingph7 ай бұрын
RX 570-esque performance on an IGP is insane. 😮
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
It's fake. The 1060 is at least 30-40% faster. Check TechYesCity's review
@dd22koopaesverde586 ай бұрын
is not fake this is the desktop version idk if it have oc@@mesicek7
@haysen1236 ай бұрын
The performance on dota 2 is still way better on gtx 1060. That game doesnt really lik APU/iGPU
@duyanhnguyen86217 ай бұрын
waiting for amd optimization, 780m will crush 1060 6gb
@cubekong62723 ай бұрын
apple m2 giving the same proferemence in just 8 watts......? thats crazy
@williamkirkpatrick69426 ай бұрын
did you turn down the quality on the nvidia? AMD looks better with 4gb than nvidia with 6gb
@GAMINGALEXYT-im7bj7 ай бұрын
I didn't expect 1060 to demolish the apu that bad in GTA💀. Thought it would be max to max a 10 fps difference.
@robertopazsoldan96417 ай бұрын
I didnt expect 1060 that got demolished by an apu in alan wake 2 and not mention that igpu can use frame generation in that game and FSR. FSR cant help the 1060 in Alan wake 2.
@GAMINGALEXYT-im7bj7 ай бұрын
@@robertopazsoldan9641 i was saying the performance compared to the other games. Also, if u can afford a 8700g, why would you even play with an igpu? U most probably just can get a good gpu at that point. The only reason of using it i can see is either u saving for a gpu & have no other choice but to go with igpu for a while or ur gpu got damaged & warranty is gonna take a while to fix it.
@mesicek77 ай бұрын
I don't believe for a second these are real figures.
@coadergrosse86967 ай бұрын
is the 8700 using the g.pwr+ c.pwr or is that a combined figure?
@battlephenom85087 ай бұрын
I'm thinking that's package power. Efficiency isn't that crazy. Maybe you save 20w with APU.
@Zsamrat7 ай бұрын
that is total cpu+gpu power total.both c pwr n g pwr showing same watts
@AdaptacionGamer7 ай бұрын
the total value is 105W
@overdriver995 ай бұрын
not bad... only if that CPU price goes down little bit..
@mimin-1566 ай бұрын
i think Ryzen new iGPU could be more powerful and still make good profit margin
@sadscarecrow7 ай бұрын
So what is G.PWR and C.PWR in 8700g? are they showing the same or I should add them to get full CPU power consumption?
@AdaptacionGamer7 ай бұрын
is the total consumption of the CPU + the IGPU, since the IGPU only consumes 15W
@FutureChaosTV6 ай бұрын
The seem to be the same as in any test by any channel I have seen up to now they are always the same +/- 1W.
@Innosos7 ай бұрын
Those lag spikes look nasty, 30fps cap might help.
@necronmaster7 ай бұрын
8700G IGPU draws 30-60% Less power and nearly same performance (performance loose is cos of bios for now and drivers. CPU dont use pbo or coreboost nicely when igpu enabled so this is a bios issue) If you use this cpu with 7000 mhz ram (i use@7000 mhz) it is much more faster than 1060. Very nice cpu. Thanks AMD. But if with 32MB L3 this cpu turns to monster but only 16MB L3....
@arbiter17 ай бұрын
faster? Seems like every game it lost outside 2 it needed AMD FSR and other was amd title. Every other game FSR was off and it lost and it was destroyed in gta 5.
@allenbrodess85102 ай бұрын
your hurting yourself with temps this stuff automatically speeds up or slows down at 60c and even lower.. drastically one should try reading the brochure/instructions thanks tho
@spg33317 ай бұрын
my issue with the 8700g is that it is too expensive and can only run a GPU with 8x Pcie gen 4 lanes and only pcie gen 4 ssd tho thats less of an issue
@user-yj2wc6wj5s7 ай бұрын
Did Black Desert Online not launch on Ryzen 7 8700G?
@garytallowin66237 ай бұрын
Alan wake 2 fps scores seems off for the 8700g compared to other videos I have seen.
@Chefteguh7 ай бұрын
could you also include moba like dota 2, valorant, lol in this kinds of test? especially in budget card/apu like this. lots of moba gamers in south east asia.
@Metrallata4 ай бұрын
with a 5700g I've been playing league in qhd with no issue or noticable lag with all the lowest setting.
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
heck even 2200g can dota in 1080
@im2garin7 ай бұрын
На уровне погрешности
@PhanTuongNhat7 ай бұрын
at first i thought 780m is a graphic card🤯🤯
@diamonshade74846 ай бұрын
Gpu
@iowesty7 ай бұрын
this is amazing, but depressing that the next apu will take out the 1060
@Tatar_Piano6 ай бұрын
80+70 = 150 watts (gtx 1069 +processor) Amd 110 watts, in 8 years only 40 watts advantage, so bad
@taydnguest82597 ай бұрын
It's great seeing an igpu do this, but unfortunately, the cut in pcie lanes will affect performance with high-end cards. As far as i can tell, 8 lanes for gpu only up to a 4060 or 4060ti is the best card you can use at full power, anything bigger will not perform like it should due to lack of lanes.
@taydnguest82597 ай бұрын
Adding to that's AMDs, G cpus are normally not as good as base or x line up. It is probably due to how much space is used up by the igpu or some power restrictions.
@G4M3RGU1D35 ай бұрын
you should update alan wake 2 it now supports series 10 cards
@Viktor_VVT-I7 ай бұрын
Radeon 780M = GTX 1060 3Gb
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
w proper tuning and part yes
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
quite far igpu has become, now it actually can run games, and really i bought 1060 like 400$ not too long ago
@Blaczek2977 ай бұрын
core clock makes a huge difference for 780m in alan wake 2
@imLKY7 ай бұрын
The Ryzen 7 8700G has a good iGPU in itself but is cpu is like using an i3 processor
@tourmaline077 ай бұрын
Hopefully this should kill off the 1060/RX580 cards , they've had a good run but now they are as fast as integrated graphics and practically obsolete for this gen.
@arbiter17 ай бұрын
as if being 7 years old isn't enough to kill them off?