Ryzen 7 9700X vs Core i7 14700K - Test in 10 Games

[@TestingGames]

Games : Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 0:09 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:54 Starfield - 1:49 CS2 - 2:40 Ghost of Tsushima - 3:35 Forza Horizon 5 - 4:31 Hogwarts Legacy - 5:28 Horizon Forbidden West - 6:29 Microsoft Flight Simulator - 7:30 The Witcher 3 - 8:20 System: Windows 11 Core i7-14700K - bit.ly/3QqUF5u ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc Ryzen 7 9700X - bit.ly/3SFMxPd MSI MPG X670E CARBON G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj

[@raminpro9765]

we want run this test again with AMD GRAPHIC CARD +(in bios enable PBO2)

[@adminwset]

Could you please add AVG C.PWR and G.PWR to the statistics presented at the end of each test, in addition to AVG FPS and 1% Low? Thanks and best regards!

[@TonyMasters-u2w]

so you quickly removed your old 7900X fake benchmarks and posting this now. you never own any of cpus you "testing"

[@FansamdRadeon7800xt]

what if I only have an RX 7800xt if I combine it with AMD Raizen 7 9700x ??

[@TestingGames]

I must warn you, I am not sure that the power consumption on the new Ryzen processor displayed correctly on the monitoring, in all games this value was exactly 88 W, which is very strange....

[@feschber]

interesting, that matches exactly with Gamers Nexus testing

[@Definedd]

88W is the max power they can draw out of the box, the 9700x is power constrained so it's gonna be constantly at that 88W to try get as much as possible I think

[@manusiaorang2842]

they might be doing some shady stuff by bottlenecking the power limit so people are forced to "overclock" (or just get the real power) while voiding the warranty, hopefully they change that policy

[@magim2039]

Is 9000 series already reachable for mainstream consumer market? I can't find it available in any store or online marketplaces?

[@laszlozsurka8991]

88W is the max power the CPU draws from the socket. AMD purposely power capped the 9700X.

[@Goreck65]

expected better performance from the new AMD processors😔

[@Theworthsearcher]

It uses less energy and gives you more FPS many times. What is the problem? 😲

[@manusiaorang2842]

​@@Theworthsearchermore fps? less power? this is gaming we're talking about bro, it's not gonna use much power

[@manusiaorang2842]

look, sometimes the 14700k use less power without e cores utilized

[@flipacoin331]

@@Theworthsearcherwho tf cares about that much power consumption

[@OmnianMIU]

​@@Theworthsearcherwhat is the problem???😂😂 ooh fan AMDesperations you are really funny 😂😂😂 we talking about +4% performance uplift from old gen of Ryzen and is the same 💩 with intel processors 13th to 14th perf uplift. The power consumption lower like this is pointless in a PC desktop. Need more power for new gens of hardware. Fact is this 9000x series is useless

[@Boraboar]

CS: Yahooooo 600 fps Hogwarts: Hold my beer 60 fps

[@itwill-change]

@@Boraboar it's 60fps lock bro👍

[@manusiaorang2842]

​@@itwill-changeavg: 74 avg: 66

[@epicnicity916]

@@itwill-change no it's just unoptimized

[@nossy232323]

AMD are in luck Intel f'ed up so much right now, otherwise this would have been a major disaster.

[@shalltearbloodfallen8712]

Once arrow lake comes, AMD is f'ed until they release the x3d CPUs

[@Old-Boy_BEbop]

@@shalltearbloodfallen8712 hmmm time will tell, 19000 employees being let go and the intel making major losses each quarter no longer supplying cpu's for mac... AMD's future is looking far more solid.

[@saricubra2867]

​@@Old-Boy_BEbopWhat the heck are you talking about. AMD just pulled a Skylake ++++++ moment with Zen 5.

[@samodyed5566]

@@shalltearbloodfallen8712 intel x3d maybe we might see one

[@Johan-rm6ec]

@@saricubra2867 True this is a refresh.

[@chadfang2267]

I waited two years for this?

[@TheUtada1983]

Wait 6 more months for 9800x3d.

[@potatopancakes3411]

Better off waiting for 9800X3D

[@Flatlined804]

@@TheUtada1983 More like 9800 XD

[@itwill-change]

@@chadfang2267 buy 7800x3d

[@hamzaboutme9424]

I waited 1 month and I'm dispoinnted

[@GOWDA_94]

No point in buying, wait for 9800x 3D

[@Igor-Bond]

No, it's better to wait for the Ryzen 7 10800X3D, it will be better!

[@LoisoPondohva]

​@@Igor-Bond pretty sure unless they completely change the numbering scheme, it will be 11800X3D

[@donny5707]

also no point getting 9800x3d. 13800x3d FTW

[@ИванНайденов-п8ж]

Зачем Вам и нам 9800x3d и так далее. Если вся производительность в ААА лежит на видео карте😂😂😂 Купил 7800x3d и забыл про новые процессоры лет на 20.😹

[@forestroad_]

Nah you should buy 99800x3d right before you get buryed

[@SamBickle133]

Would like to see compared to the 7700x, 7800x3d and 5800x3d

[@expert8665]

1% lows amazing on intel. It's very smooth and consistent gameplay. No stuttering.

[@selohcin]

That's because the Intel chip can use all the power it needs to fully utilize all of its cores, while the AMD chip is limited to 88 watts.

[@Decki777]

​@@selohcinno it's the power issue it's the chiplet latency issue only 3d chips are worth buying.

[@connorjade5460]

And intel getting crashed in your system

[@selohcin]

@@Decki777 The 9700X has only one chiplet. There's no cross-CCX lag because there is no other CCD.

[@Richdadful]

@@Decki777 yes AMD infact has slightly better IPC than intel and sips less power. But intel has better memory latency. AMDs memory latency in starting ryzen was very bad. It improved a lot in 5000 series and in 9000 series it better but still short of intel. THats why x3d chips are so fast. This is the same reason why intel doesnt needs x3d and is doing fine even after putting half the cache of amd in each of its CPU.

[@808chadda]

Damn intels 0.1% lows are insane especially on cyberbug

[@fancycat3360]

88w @ 5.3Ghz in cyberpunk is not that bad. You can hide this cpu in mini-itx case and everything will be fine

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

though it advertised 5.5

[@manusiaorang2842]

you could also pick up 7700 (come with a cooler)

[@gametime4316]

7700 non x is the same for less money. in some cases the 7700 is actually more efficient then the 9700X which is sad... ( the 9700X is locked to 88W and use it in all games, the 7700 can drop to 60-70W in some games and keep about the same FPS as the 9700X) sad generation from AMD.

[@manusiaorang2842]

@@iikatinggangsengii2471 probably single core only

[@he1go2lik3it]

I like how you chose the time for each benchmark and show us the average final result after each run. Great job.

[@adtex02]

I dont understand this isnt r7 9700x supposed to be more efficient overall and have less temperatures, but as it seems in gaming is has comparable power draw to a i7 14700k.. Like how?

[@TSracer1]

Maybe you have been listening too much to AMDs marketing team and AMD fanboys. Lots of misleading information that does not translate to the real world. Welcome to reality. (This is an improvement compared to previous gen AMD though. A very small improvement.)

[@adtex02]

@@TSracer1 bro just see ltt's latest video, isn't he the best source for this type of content?

[@TSracer1]

​@@adtex02 ​ I`ve seen it. I think LTT are great at entertainment. The best. Which is why he is the most popular with the most views. Most entertaining does not translate to the best, most accurate, and most thorough though. I would recommend to watch Hardware unboxed and Gamers Nexus for more professional and in depth reviews. Jayz2Cents review are also interesting. But more importantly. Learn to analyse results and think for yourself. Evaluate different sources. Including the results in this video. The new Ryzen CPUs are not bad, but they are not a big step forward either. If you are primarily a gamer, you should probably stick to the AMD X3D models. Ill probably wait for next gen intel before I decide on anything. Im mostly a "desktop user", lots of idle time and I just want a dead silent pc most of the time. AMD use roughly 5x more power at idle compared to intel. About 23,5W for R7 9700x (which is great for an AMD), but intel is at about 4,3w. I prefer a system with zero fans running most of the time and for my use Intel is cooler and more efficient most of the time. Too bad about their 13-14gen issues though. Id probably skip those for now.

[@TSracer1]

@@adtex02 Not sure if my comment to you got deleted. Was pretty long. In short I would recommend you Gamers Nexus and Hardware unboxed for thorough and unbiased reviews . The video we comment on also show real world usage. I would take it all into consideration. LTT is a great source for infotainment.

[@theelepel2679]

@@TSracer1 I mean, sure. thats completely true, but from any kind of source of benchmarking using this? its quite just as questionable of its own while not using more evidential sources like gamers nexus, hardware unboxed, techspot, techpowerup.

[@PCPresupuestos]

Did you make the comparison by installing the BETA update on the Intel motherboard? This is the data we are interested in. Thanks and like.

[@PCPresupuestos]

@@ChrisL-d4c My comment is from three weeks ago 😱👍

[@selohcin]

It seems that the 9700X is routinely 5-10% slower than the 14700K, and this is due almost entirely to the 88-watt power limit AMD set for the processor.

[@manusiaorang2842]

born to rma, forced to overclock

[@XxApo70xX]

Oh at least they are not crashing like them. Lets see if intel can fix this

[@Johan-rm6ec]

@@XxApo70xX AMD has again memory comp issues that being said. Next AMD chips i heard will have a lose power thing so lets see what the 9900x 12 core will bring to the table.

[@notenjoying666]

80w is a whole socket power consumption, not 88 for cpu.

[@manusiaorang2842]

@@notenjoying666 yeah and the whole socket is needed for just the cpu, what's your point?

[@itwill-change]

No doubt Ryzen 7 7800x3d better at all cost I will buy it when 10000series will launch 🙂

[@pauloazuela8488]

For gaming that is

[@GremlinIsDead]

3d cash❤

[@itwill-change]

@@GremlinIsDead yes

[@subham26]

I will wait for snapdragon x Elite 😂😂😂😅

[@itwill-change]

@@subham26 nice still will good😁

[@club4ghz]

Hogwarts Legacy must be highly benefit from super-tuned ram as I'm getting more fps in there than both of them with 13600K 5.7 and DDR4 4000

[@HeartOfAdeII]

Yeah, Hogwarts Legacy is crazy ram and latency sensitive. My 9900KS + 4266cl16 comfortably beats 5700x3d in this one. And 13600K can probably outperform even 9900x/9950x in games with a full ram tune

[@club4ghz]

@@HeartOfAdeII I think it's so CPU limited because of all the objects, I mean everything in this game is highly detailed, high quality meshes, you can enter every building, and every building is full of high-quality stuff plus ray tracing on top of it.

[@HeartOfAdeII]

@club4ghz It's also the reason, but I have a simpler explanation- it's got terrible optimization 😂 AC Unity enters the chat

[@club4ghz]

​@@HeartOfAdeII AC Unity engine is really good at multi-threading, all Ubisoft games are good at that, and the Unreal Engine is only using half of the CPU or less for most of the time.

[@club4ghz]

@@HeartOfAdeII All except for the Far Cry series, this one broken too LOL

[@NGreedia]

I think I'll be staying on my 5700x3d for a while longer at this rate

[@Johan-rm6ec]

Be cautious, 9800x3D in drop replacement may give memory compability problems. Gamers Nexus is meantioning that. Good research is needed.

[@Old-Boy_BEbop]

no need if one is still gaming at 60fps and playing games at 1440p or 4k its mostly gpu bound.

[@gamingzonebenchmarking9614]

intel 8 games win & amd only 2 games win

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

its close to alot more high powered cpu, which is very impressive

[@auritro3903]

​@@iikatinggangsengii2471 quite true, except it's coming from a new architecture vs Raptor Lake which was basically released 2 years ago. Not to mention, there are instances where the i7 consumes less power for more performance, although not by a lot.

[@connorjade5460]

Amd defeating 2 games is impressive to given that amd 9700x has only 8 cores and i7 there has more than 14 cores

[@ManoloDaOcarina]

BEST CHANNEL EVER! Thanks for showing that Hogwarts Legacy can run really well at 16GB RAM I always thought that for my new computer I should get more RAM DDR5 is really expensive here in Brazil right now, but I can start at 16GB in peace and upgrade later when I can

[@club4ghz]

Can you do 9600X vs 13600K as 13600K is like $50 cheaper at the moment.

[@connorjade5460]

9700x is held back with its own TDP. It's almost the same fps with half of it's cores as compared to intel.

[@draxevisuals]

they both have 8 cores, intel doesnt use its e-cores for gaming

[@justrandomguy8002]

the performance difference in cs2 really big , how is that happening . yes i know cs2 is cpu game but ..

[@Pawcio2115]

Ryzen is always the best in cs

[@feschber]

It looks big but 649 / 585 is just a 10% difference

[@savagej4y241]

But monitors only go up to about 540Hz now and they both surpass 540 FPS so no real difference lol

[@manusiaorang2842]

fat cache

[@manusiaorang2842]

there will probably be monitor bottlenecking and screen tearing, you're probably wanna limit the fps anyways

[@RobertFromEarth]

Those tests were conducted without PBO (9700X overclocked). This PBO thing make the reviews on the net really confusing. Without PBO, the 9700X looks not that good. Of course power efficiency is great but the perfs are the same as the 7700X. Very strange that AMD didn't go for a higher TDP like ~105W.

[@notenjoying666]

@@RobertFromEarth pbo is enabled by default on am5 platform.

[@AndreFreitas91250]

PBO enabled in the 9700x only makes a significant difference in productivity. In gaming it's only 1% or 2% better

[@rENEGADE666JEDI]

pbo itself doesn't give much, it's easy and safe to give +200mhz and UV -20, that gives you over 10% in games

[@-Rizecek-]

So my 13600K it can keep up with the 9600x as well. Beauty... Quite a disappointment from AMD. Between the 7700x and the 9700x it seems to me that there is no difference at all.

[@auritro3903]

The power consumption is interesting. The 9700X always consumes like 85-90W consistently. On the other hand, the 14700K consumes either less, and sometimes, even more than the 9700X, makimg it either more effeciwnt or less.

[@vZ3kas]

I have the 9700x whit an rx 7900xtx and im glad!!! Nice cpu for gaming and general use 👌

[@UM_88-s2c]

I highly doubt only 8 cores is enough for productivity

[@gametime4316]

I have seen it in some 7700 vs 7700X test as well, the 7700 is locked to 88W in many games, its an AMD thing when they cap power they just let the cpu clock as high as it can at that power cap. so in games that the 7700X hoover around 90-110W the 7700 is locked to 88W and lose like 200-400MHZ, if the game is not heavy they both use the same power for about the same clocks. the *9700X* just act more like the 7700 than the 7700X. in few games u can see the 7700X and 7700 use less then 88W but the 9700X still use 88W so sometimes its less efficient then 7700 O_O

[@Osamah001]

what is the latest ryzen processor right now ?

[@auritro3903]

9700X and 9600X

[@Osamah001]

@@auritro3903 ryzen 9 9700x ?

[@bobbybobby9955]

ntel should make a special gaming series to compete with amd's x3d series

[@joelfernando1]

Amd only relevant in 1080p.

[@oxaile4021]

@@joelfernando1 So AMD is only relevant when gpu isn't the bottleneck? 🤣🤣🤣

[@OmnianMIU]

No, not needed for intel's solutions

[@Osamah001]

Air cooler is enough for 14700k ? what you think

[@Maiasar-lv6be]

Not

[@Maiasar-lv6be]

Arctic liquid freezer 420iii

[@jmtake85]

air cooler is ok.

[@nick-dogg]

Pretty similar fps with both CPU’s. I was actually surprised that the wattage between the two very very close in some of the games

[@BlackNomad1]

Weird. As an Intel guy I’m always use to seeing the AMD fanboys point out that AMD is better than Intel yet in all but I think 2(?) tests the i7 smashed the AMD one.

[@matiasaquino6213]

There was a recent windows update that improved the performance on AMD a little (~10% I think) and the 7000 series have around the same performance for significantly cheaper prices, when considering that, I'd still say AMD beat intel.

[@auritro3903]

​@@matiasaquino6213 HUB did a test and he found that Intel also gained performance, and the 9700X was still slower than the 14700K, just by a smaller margin now.

[@peterpanini96]

I dont care about 10 fps less on ryzen... i still get 24 cores for less money than Intel... 😂😂😂

[@2DEZstb]

Are you sure that it's OK with your Ryzen,hermano? I run my Ryzen in Starfield, with your GPU presets, in Atlantis and I didn't get 88W. At most 60-65W, the CPU usage is about the same...but mine is a bit lower there too...check it again...and please update your version/build...I have V1.12.36.0 and you have V1.9.67.0. Stay safe

[@XBOT2.0]

The R7 9700X runs cool and efficient at 88 watts-but it’s also serving up low FPS! 😄

[@Akun-uv5qi]

AMD can PBO and lift power restrictions. In some overclocking video tests I have seen, AMD is better. Don’t blindly rely on Intel. 13-14 generation CPUs are a disaster!!!

[@gametime4316]

the interesting part is that in programs 9700X show impressive efficiency marching 7700X (140W) with only 88W or power but in games where the 7700X use 60-100W depend on the game this CPU sit at 88W no matter what and at all games, making it may times actually less efficient than the 7700X.

[@gametime4316]

basically it the same as happen in Ghost of Tsushima in this video as well.

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

maybe still buggy sensors, thats motherboard manufacturer's job

[@gametime4316]

@@iikatinggangsengii2471 well few days later and after the HUB review with the 7700 65W its safe to say its not a buggy sensor. that CPU just sit at 88W no matter what game u are running.

[@niezzayt3809]

this is more like AM4 initial Release and 2nd Gen release Looking back, Ryzen 1000 was absolutely fantastic. But when Ryzen 2000 came out, it feels underwhelming. Now it's just History repeating itself

[@vottka1l]

Look at the stutters and lows in Cyberbug 20666. 8 cores are clearly not enough for CPU-dependent games

[@BlankFX]

What OSD is @TestingGames using and is the OSD-Config available for download?

[@PhotoJohn80]

Can you do the same test with PBO enabled?

[@hanauzaki6264]

Waiting for ur test eagerly on 9 9000 series

[@PURE-ww4wd]

Is this with pbo enable on the 9700x or stock ?

[@sonesh4207]

Hii man , I just saw hardware unboxed review of Ryzen 5 9600x and its a terrible value itseems ,anyways expecting a comparison between it and ryzen 5 7600x from your side too .

[@AccuracyGaming]

But why ddr5 6000 if that’s the sweet spot for the amd. But not for the intel ?

[@echiquiel458]

How do you keep those temperatures at 14800k?

[@MoXy69YT]

Ambient temperature, good airflow and good cooler

[@artomanninen9522]

i own 14700 ks and very happy with waterccooling on it

[@MrShoniBare]

Can u redo the 9000x series versus 14th gen with new 24h2?

[@rishikarthik7813]

Can you test 7800x3D vs 9700x in CS2

[@far_tech5555]

Strange. 9700x was only better in 2 games, which tested with built-in benchmarks. Wondering in real game scenes, it can also keep the lead over 14700k!

[@ALONE_EFX]

Ryzen 4070 gang 💀>

[@marshabrightly1307]

So basically intel i7 14700k with 8+12+28 is a dust here.....

[@connorjade5460]

Yes

[@jeanpaul9719]

Is it worth upgrading my intel i7-10700F to the i7-14700K?

[@pablofernandez6850]

The i7 10700F (8 cores) is an excellent CPU for gaming but the i7 14700KF offers you more cores (12cores) and higher frequencies but also better performance than the 10700F. I repeat that the 10700F is more than enough to play !! 😎👍

[@josecangrejo3086]

It looks like consumption monitoring is broken, it is locked at 88w with a 30% load like 90%.

[@itezlogaming]

9700x has poor performance only on stock bios options! Enable PBO, turn on Curve Optimizer, add 100 mhz boost, scalar 5x-10x and you will see the difference!

[@Gamer-q7v]

It would still trail behind the 7800X3D in gaming performance. What you said could make a noticeable difference in terms of the 9700X performance. However, after two years, this is a lackluster performance uplift. It's hard to deny that. Disappointing to say the least.

[@grimfist79]

Which if you do on 7700x will have same result. This cpu is still ~ 7-10% faster than 7700x.

[@auritro3903]

Ah yes, we have unstable cpu vs marginal improvement cpu, test in 10 games

[@sadrover]

Why less ram for i7 ? 32 gb on amd is boosting the cpu

[@filippobrandimarte1239]

So 14700k Is 5% on avarage faster that 9700x however 9700x has "only" 8C/16T and a TDP of 65 Watts!!!! In addition 13 the and 14th gen of Intel CPU have a huge issue according to the latest reports!!

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

the cpu is real deal, like top of the line perf w 65w like lul, pentium g power

[@YGoD6]

You set AMD fixed TDP

[@jmtake85]

it design as fixed TDP Because of chiplets

[@ivangarciaduvivier5947]

ryzen 7 7900x + 4070 ti super 16gb is a good combo?

[@mrplatozon6077]

Yeap best one

[@christofos]

9800X3D about to be a gaming beast.

[@Decki777]

14700k has better 1% low fps and better 0.1% fps means way better smooother experience than 9700x

[@dalibordupor3979]

And now we have 9800x3d a new king that beats old king 7800x3d.Amd finally managed to beat Amd after poor Zen 5 vanilla gaming uplift.

[@UM_88-s2c]

7800x3d is ass, that shitty cpu can't even do streaming

[@dhimxstan8804]

9700x not very impressive

[@kilhbffvc7011]

14700k - 380$ 9700x - 240$

[@CarFlightGamesCFG]

@@kilhbffvc7011 14700 2x mais rápido em hard work.

[@scizzorxyz]

@@kilhbffvc7011 where you getting 9700x for 240$

[@samodyed5566]

@@kilhbffvc7011 where to get 9700x for 240? i will but 10000 units and sell to amd fanboys to earn money easily its 359 dollar bro not 240

[@kingeling]

​@@kilhbffvc7011 Not impressive at all compared to 7700X

[@Danny-BigD]

haha.. keep the I7 14700k.. yeah sure you got a good one.

[@OutOfRangeDE]

Seems like the new gen only improved in other workloads than gaming significantly... so no upgrqde time for gamers. But AMD said they are planning to optimize x3d CPUs in different ways (more ways than 7000x3d) so that one might be a surprise coming in a few months.

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

its actually what im worried abt

[@AssettoReshades]

usually the the new gen X variant should beat or trade blows with the last gen x3d variant but this time its not even close , welp there goes me waiting to buy a budget cpu to match the x3d instead of spending on a i9 or a r9

[@GAMINGALEXYT-im7bj]

Intel was 2x8 Gigs where AMD was 2x 16?

[@БрухБрух-щ7и]

Can you retest? New windows 11 update improves fps

[@2010Zanoza2]

Why AMD shows so low results in most games? It's new 9700 processor not an old 7800, but Intel beats it with greater results in many modern games. We need comparison of 9950 vs 14700K to understand what is going on. I suppose that many modern games engines provide threads parallelization with a low load for each thread. For example, 10 threads with 30% load is better than 2 threads with 60% load.

[@CarFlightGamesCFG]

The game does not test the processor. It depends a lot on the optimization of each producer.

[@2010Zanoza2]

@@Daniel_Martin777 Probably no, 88w locking allows the processor to show 5,3Ghz freq that is obviously enough. I bet on modern games optimization.

[@StsarDuzt]

Yo your RTX 4090 Clock speed is 15 MHz diff

[@iamagoodboi]

8:21 where is rdr2?

[@tomdjou7939]

Ви порівнюєте предтоповий 14700 з процесором середнього сегменту. Порівняйте з предтоповим 9800, коли він з'явиться.

[@dstamura]

not bad for a 65W chip vs 200W. Just imagine R7 9700X set to same power envelope as 14700K. AMD is reserving Zen5 to fight Lunarlake. Zen5 X3D vs Lunarlake... fight!

[@eric131313]

X version should have been at least 100 watts, unnecessary restriction from amd in desktop segment

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

i like 65w more, true their typical 140 prob would win, prob smth like 9790x will happen who knows

[@wonghoyuen]

Did you disable the SMT? Someone said it will increase the performance.

[@samuelcarneiro2210]

The Witcher or Red Dead 😂?

[@ellypsis603]

big letdown

[@fabiofrancisco2703]

actually 9950x vs 14900k, then 9900x vs 14700k. 9700x must be compared with 14600k.

[@clydesimpson1301]

In my place, 9700x is priced higher than 14700k.. so pricing wise, it is the right comparison.

[@revengeru]

It still loses, the I5 is faster

[@PRXBRYAN]

why the hell a test at 1080p? he should do a 4k test

[@Old-Boy_BEbop]

why that's gpu testing not cpu... you wanna draw more gaming rendering to the cpu and to do so is take the gpu out of the equation... why do you think all cpu benchmarks are performed at low resolutions.

[@jhendra83]

At 4K benchmarks the CPU test is pointless.

[@lum4te]

14700 vs 9800x3d

[@tranceforeverclassics]

AMD will increase Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X TDP from 65W to 105W, with AGESA 1.2.0.1a Patch A.

[@むんく-w3h]

why can i play this video in background. i dont even have a youtube premium

[@BlackSteelz1]

4090 is yawning at these CPUs. It's time for AMD and Intel to play catch-up.

[@rakesh1519]

Intel power draw is high but it's cooler than 9700x...wtf

[@jmtake85]

because intel have the best packaging in the world. that is also the reason why intel can use 10nm beat tsmc 4nm

[@Alex-dl7pw]

amd nailed it in efficiency and in some games it outperforme the i9, but as all say, these are their allrounder, not only gaming cpu, just wait until the x3d comes :) have high hopes

[@playbackstorage9303]

Looks like every test with AMD CPU has 88 W power consumption, and that's weird. Looks fake

[@robertbolzicco9995]

I bet once again like all mad stuff. New biso, mobo, and chipset drivers theae will mature just fine. Also when they push higher wattage. Who knows. Still a better xpu than an intel that suffers from currosion and crashing, with no refund from intel. Also not worth upgrading for the 4k gamers. We need better gpus to be honest.

[@andreapolo1]

Nothing can explain Hogwarts Legacy performance, wtf!

[@kafir-magriban8009]

People often forget that AMD's "X" series chips are designed with enthusiast overclockers in mind, offering plenty of headroom for manual tuning. If you’re not into spending weeks fine-tuning memory settings and CPU voltages in the BIOS, these chips probably aren’t for you. Instead, consider opting for the 3D or X3D variants, which are optimized for top-tier gaming performance right out of the box, with minimal tweaking needed.

[@skrypa7]

This rysen 7 9700 is in a weird spot. There is no reason to buy it. Amd should start releasing just the x3d models for 8 cores.

[@Sukhdeepblimparmy]

better wait for price cut.

[@AkiraSendoh7]

3:43 let's ride horse and check fps

[@stevensv4864]

now both at 5.5ghz

[@gwramim4807]

9700x is a mess

[@chadfang2267]

ryzen 9000*

[@gwramim4807]

@@chadfang2267 9900x and 9950x will thrash Intel 14th and 15th in productivity as 15th gen will have not hyper threading so those chips will be the multicore king all while consuming less power so 9700x is a mess and 9600x is disaster

[@lharsay]

@@gwramim4807 Core Ultra 9 285K should win productivity, the P cores might have lost HT but the E cores are supposedly 70% faster than last gen E cores and Intel will also likely win efficiency with the TSMC 3nm node against AMD's TSMC 4nm. The only questions left are gaming performance against X3D and pricing.

[@gwramim4807]

@@lharsay *will Let them come first after all Intel is doing I have lost hope ( former Intel user here) Besides leaks say otherwise as they don't have any improvement in multicore

[@XxApo70xX]

​@@chadfang2267Woow our huper super duper smart guy says that the entire 9000 series is a mess, even before the 9950x and 9900x were released yet.👏

[@Жека-т8ы]

У 9700x что зашито потребление на уровне 88ватт? Во всех играх одно и тоже потребление!

[@jimbean9142]

88w @Ryzen 9700x. guess ur not using open powerlimits. (pbo) default ist weak at the moment.

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

its tdp 65w so its locked 65w

[@iikatinggangsengii2471]

but ryzen 7000 indeed can be set to 170w so maybe youre correct, can be unlocked

[@jimbean9142]

@@iikatinggangsengii2471 "der8bauer EN" did it and it was actually ~170 watts and significantly more computing power.

[@moviekids8435]

7800x3d "hello"

[@mairedegrasville99]

still 67 fps in hogwarts legacy at 1080p lol.. ridiculous.

[@Johan-rm6ec]

Again TG a top notch video.

[@MarylandDevin]

That FPS in Hogwarts though. A 4090 and hightier system like this getting FPS like that in 1080p? I would expect that in 4K, but in 1080, that's just a disappointment

[@masterlee1988]

That's with ray tracing on. But yeah Hogwarts Legacy is notorious for being so demanding with ray tracing.

[@MarylandDevin]

@@masterlee1988 yeah I get it, but still. So is that game even playable with top tier system in 4k with rt on? Imo a top tier system should be able to play any game at 4k max settings 60 fps.