It’s so subtle what he’s saying believe in yourself
@abcrane2 жыл бұрын
Kierkegaard mastered the becoming, his light so stunning !
@paulcostinett8867 жыл бұрын
Long time user of your videos, Prof. Found your stuff while taking Logic using the Hurley textbook. Your demonstrations and explanations on categorical, propositional, and symbolic logic were a necessary condition for my success. Since then, your material has been my go-to resource on most aspects of philosophy. I just started a class last week on Existentialism with Kierkegaard as the opening subject. This video could not be more timely. Thanks.
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Who in the world would ever say something about passion like that at 27:51 this individual is pure genius. It makes me humble. He has plunged the depths of thought
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Everytime I listen to something about kierk I am stunned by his thoughts. I literally just thought this thought today, the quote you read at around 23 min
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
He is literally talking to himself in that passage at 23 min
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Lol you just mentioned how he is talking to himself at 24
@gazrater18202 жыл бұрын
Fantastic overview. Thank you I look forward to your review on Husserl phenomenology.
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
45 min this guy is so eloquent and persuasive boutta have conversion right Here right now
@leamercatwild33546 жыл бұрын
Kierkegaard’s notion of “Necessity” is our “essential” limit. “…actuality is a unity of possibility and necessity.” A unity of freedom and necessity.
@ankitasharma4095 жыл бұрын
Please suggest books fo reading existentialism
@lijiahou1787 жыл бұрын
This video is very helpful. Thank you very much!
@edthoreum76257 жыл бұрын
18:00 essence/ gene& existence/choice
@mileskeller52442 жыл бұрын
If faith can lead people to multiple conclusions, is that a good way by which to come to TRUE conclusions?
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Everyone is in despair from the time we’re born to the time we die we have to suffer. Consciousness makes cowards of us all
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Kierk is a savior and he doesn’t even want to take credit for it
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Why did descartes doubt
@fadyalfons11056 жыл бұрын
How Kierkegaard effects post-modernism?
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Locke descartes how do they relate to this
@netsaosa49736 жыл бұрын
neechie-senpai XD
@yomama8473 жыл бұрын
36:00
@martinrea8548 Жыл бұрын
I think you might have been searching for the Council of Nicaea, held in 325 AD, where the nature of God was discussed.
@PhilosophicalTechne Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
Proof becomes necessary, damn this guy is insane. People have faith so if a god showed up in person no one would believe that god has actually come to earth
@skwbtm17 жыл бұрын
Kierkegaard was 17 in 1830 and entered the university. Goethe died 1831 Hegel died 1832 Everyone had to read Hegel.
@xXMoneyLensXx5 жыл бұрын
I'm very sorry but a lot of this is wrong. E.g. there is a stage before the aesthetic stage. And Either or is not about the ethical stage versus the religious stage, it's actually versus the aesthetic. And Kierkegaard did actually write alot about religion.
@ezlivin58352 жыл бұрын
According to who, YOU?
@xXMoneyLensXx2 жыл бұрын
@@ezlivin5835 Yes... I am very learned in Kierkegaard, having worked with many Kierkegaard scholars and done a lot of work myself.
@tristanhurley90717 жыл бұрын
Playyaaaaaa.
@yadhua3345 жыл бұрын
Basically a Chad
@47ejecting24 жыл бұрын
@@yadhua334 To use contemporary terms - Kierkegaard: luminous volcel Nietzsche: twisted incel
@devonashwa79772 жыл бұрын
He wants full faith and he wants us to not know anything, there’s no point in philosophy no point in logic
@alceref98545 жыл бұрын
U are wrong on Christian belief that Jesus is fully God and fully man. The correct belief is that Jesus is truly God and truly man. To be fully one thing and another at the same time in the same relationship is a contradiction.
@daniel-zh4qc4 жыл бұрын
The ball is fully round and fully fully red.... Not a contradiction ... The problem is fully and truly are not predicates of an object.... Read your kant; they are categories of analysis and description....
@raganwall19903 жыл бұрын
Well in my sixteen years of twice weekly participation in the southern Baptist church, we were always taught "fully God, fully man"
@angeljesusparedessanchez52802 жыл бұрын
I think you lost the point of the video
@danielp45282 жыл бұрын
Kierkegaard is literally about how truth is contradictive
@fadyalfons11056 жыл бұрын
How Kierkegaard effects post-modernism?
@tgc2815 жыл бұрын
fady Alfons he would most likely be opposed to it.