Jeffrey Hunter, Peter van Eyck, Bernard Lee, John Schlesinger, Derek Prentice - and a very unfortunate crew - in "Sailor Of The King" (British title: "Single-Handed"), directed by Roy Boulting.
Пікірлер: 297
@jimstanga63904 жыл бұрын
Jeffrey Hunter has a magical rifle. At long shots, it’s a Kar98 Mauser. In close-ups, it’s a No.4 Lee Enfield. It also never needs reloading.
@joedunleavy70663 жыл бұрын
And has an unlimited magazine
@alecblunden86153 жыл бұрын
He seems to fire 10 rounds at a sitting, which is fine for a No4, but not the K,98k. Then again, movie m agic always provided revolvers with 50 or more rounds.
@joelgarner25883 жыл бұрын
Ah the good old days lol
@willfriar80542 жыл бұрын
Isn't it amazing The Power of One Freedom seed. If you have a freedom seed projector. One man can do the work of hundreds. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed under penalty of death they left a sentence out of the Constitution
@lordeden273211 ай бұрын
It's a film for entertainment not a training film
@eugenrpoole88183 ай бұрын
Good movie
@larss3374 жыл бұрын
This was originally a book, sadly I can't remember the title.
@S2503854 жыл бұрын
"Brown on Resolution" by C. S. Forester.
@sapper824 жыл бұрын
@@S250385 Originally set in The Great War, not WW2.
@josephcorsbie27538 жыл бұрын
it was filmed in color , where is the original?!
@S2503858 жыл бұрын
+JOSEPH CORSBIE It was filmed in Black & White (see also its IMDB page, "Technical Specs", www.imdb.com/title/tt0046267/), even though most of its posters (and its DVD cover) are coloured.
@kerrycraig55194 жыл бұрын
@@S250385 I saw this film as a kid in the mid 1950s and could have sworn it was in color. Just shows the sort of tricks memory can play on you.
@tedjohnson93293 жыл бұрын
I saw this movie in 1953. It was booked into our theater. Most of us kids weren't that far from the actual WWII years and we drooled over the prospect of knocking off Germans. Great movie.
@CurtisDrew13 жыл бұрын
I think I saw it in 1958 on the Air Force Base we were living on at the time. I can remember also watching "4 days in Naples" around the same time.
@michaelwills192614 күн бұрын
The propaganda was strong on that subject, still is though cracks are showing finally
@dotconnector14188 күн бұрын
I probably saw this movie when I was 10 in 1963. And yes I watched hoping for the ship to sink as well.
@haydnjenkins760711 ай бұрын
Based on a book I read many years ago " Brown on Resolution" great story. In the book he didn't survive.
@wallyjohns73124 ай бұрын
Also, the book was set in WW I.
@peterpierce92332 ай бұрын
Hey!! What Library do d you get the book from?? I got the book from a Library in Baton Rouge La. Best War Book I ever read in 1967
@Woodcademy6 күн бұрын
Yup, from CS Forrester
@hobo14522 жыл бұрын
A lost classic! Not the best movie ever made, but the idea of one driven man keeping a powerful German warship hostage and trapped in a secluded harbor is epic. I was lucky enough to find a copy of this movie on DVD.
@Inkling7773 жыл бұрын
If memory serves me correctly, the novel on which this is based, C.S. Forester's, "Brown on Resolution," has a less happy ending. He's killed but delays the repair long enough that the British capture and sink the ship, leaving no survivors. No one learns of his heroism.
@theophilusthistle19883 жыл бұрын
The studio actually filmed two endings Brown lives in one and dies in another ....audiences wanted him to survive.....The DVD extras shows the other ending...
@trooperdgb97223 жыл бұрын
Not only that... but the Captain of the British ship that sinks the raider is his father. (Not that either of them know it) Great book!
@zen4men10 ай бұрын
@@trooperdgb9722 And that is the whole point of the story!
@paulcampbell52027 жыл бұрын
This movie is obviously based on the British author C.S. Forester's novel, "Brown on Resolution"
@bgbeck554 жыл бұрын
Obviously
@alecblunden86153 жыл бұрын
There was an earlier adaptation set, somewhat more realistically and accurately, in WW1
@deafsmith10063 жыл бұрын
Turns out... it never happened but I understand the Queen of England said, "If it didn't happen, it ought to have!" Yes, Brown on Resolution!
@sugarnads3 жыл бұрын
@@alecblunden8615 there was a book set in ww1 with a similar premise too.
@tag4277 жыл бұрын
I watched this film over 50 years ago on NBC's "Saturday night at the movies" But the movie never seem to air after that. Never forgot Hunter sniping away to delay the repairs! Thanks for posting!
@QED_6 жыл бұрын
@tag427: "Saturday Night at the Movies" (!) Blast from the past . . .
@davidhamilton66123 жыл бұрын
@@QED_, don't forget "Magic Shadows".
@dmutant26353 жыл бұрын
My grandmother and I watched The Day the Earth Stood Still together thanks to Saturday Night At the Movies. Good call.
@DavidMartini-g9n3 ай бұрын
I saw it the same way...
@blackbird56343 жыл бұрын
This scene is worth a recruiting poster at the very least. It's all I ever wanted out of the Army: a chance to slow up the enemy, to gum up their works, to take a few of the fukkas down before I go, and the chance to prove an infantry man with his rifle is a force to be reckoned with.
@Delogros3 жыл бұрын
Weird, as far as I can tell in the wide shot he is aiming a proper mauser but in the closeups it's definitely a lee Enfield action :S
@joedunleavy70663 жыл бұрын
Mauser has a 5 round magazine but he was getting off rounds quickly for a bolt action and reloading just as fast
@Inkling7773 жыл бұрын
Movie productions are supposed to have people who're there to catch these inconsistencies. Apparently this one did not.
@joedunleavy70663 жыл бұрын
@@Inkling777 it's a British movie if that helps explain it. Did you also notice the Mauser has a 5 round magazine and the Enfield has a 10. He also had trouble with using the bolt action but was cranking out the rounds mighty fast
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
@@joedunleavy7066 A trained man could . I have seen it done . And very accurately too !
@daviddirom74293 жыл бұрын
Lee enfield magazine is very distinctive
@andrewsteele76633 жыл бұрын
I watched this movie as a kid and loved it, brilliant, cheers
@mred70303 жыл бұрын
ditto
@louisavondart91783 жыл бұрын
Everyone notices the Lee Enfield No.4 mk 1 but no-one sees the Bofors AA gun on the ship.
@deafsmith10063 жыл бұрын
Well it was the HMS Manxman.... fitted for the film with large mock-up gun turrets over her 4" guns. But it had 2 pounder Mk VII AAA guns.
@celticman19093 жыл бұрын
As in any military situation perimeter security is crucial. I would think that upon arrival at a suitable place to conduct such emergency repairs a detachment of Marines would first be deployed to reconnnoiter the area to know what is beyond the sight of the ship. If the area is truly vacant of threat than a roving patrol of Naval Infantry would be tasked to maintain perimeter security. Not a military man myself, but gotta fiqure that that is written in procedure somewhere. Sorry to be a kill Joy. Or to pop the bubble of the plot of the film.
@S25038513 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome, @evam2es. Those were the days when action heroes were not like cartoons...
@docmallard211 ай бұрын
SMLE? Mauser? Make up your mind continuity department!
@spbryant Жыл бұрын
Very good and underated movie.
@S25038513 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the suggestion, @tedjinla. I took your advice and uploaded the Amesbury/Essen battle under the title "Single-Handed/Sailor of the King (1953) - Naval Battle". Certainly one of the most exciting and well filmed sequences in the movie.
@humble4101110 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing this movie on TV years ago. Jeffrey Hunter spends the whole movie with his shirt off. Funny to see one innocent looking young man shooting other innocent looking young men. That's war.
@fragmaka8 жыл бұрын
+humble41011 Sad but yes....they could be having a beer if things were different
@codyjoewhite256311 жыл бұрын
Simple fact: If Sailor of the King came on TV, I watched it! Wonderful acting and realism. Except for the trivial rifle switch every thing was perfect. Before the big guns fire, Jeffrey uses a German Mauser M 98K. After the big guns stop firing they've switched his rifle to a British Lee Enfield Mark 5. Do note the longer stock's forearm with less barrel length showing and the 10 round magazine below the receiver.
@rotorheadv83 жыл бұрын
You have to wonder how the Continuity person missed that. And how Hunter didn’t say something.
@johneyon52572 жыл бұрын
doesn't seem a likely mistake - maybe they had only one mauser - and it was damaged or lost - and being in Malta - they had endfields available - they likely thought it could be substituted since few of the audience would notice - - such compromises are done all the time in war movies - guns - uniforms - tanks - etc - - hell - Top Gun had american fighters (F5s) substituting for russian fighters - more people would have noticed that
@kevingodkin82998 ай бұрын
no it was an Enfield Number 4 rifle
@ZuluLifesaBeech-4 жыл бұрын
Know someone has probably stated this but, during the Falklands War didn't some SAS Soldiers blast the bridge on an Aregintine warship make it beat feet all ahead aft? Life imitating art?
@pnonnymouse48403 жыл бұрын
I believe it was part of the Royal marine contingent in the first hours of the invasion using a Carl Gustav antitank recoliless at close range. Do not think that they hit the bridge. But did cause enough damage for that ship to withdraw to Argentina.
@DOLRED5 жыл бұрын
Bernard Lee also starred in the sea drama "Pursuit of the Graf Spee" and was a prisoner on the Graf Spee. That movie had two titles---the other being "The Battle of the River Platte." The Graf Spee is a true story. The Graf Spee was described as a "Pocket Battleship" by the Brits and considered a Raider. Since the Essen was disabled in this movie, there is a parallel theme between this movie and the true story of the fate of the Graf Spee...
@chrisholland73674 жыл бұрын
Battle of the river Platte good film but no a scratch on The cruel sea or in which we serve.
@stephenfelstead98023 жыл бұрын
In my opinion one of the best films ever
@АлександрПушкинкомодинформацио14 күн бұрын
Вы явно не смотрели фильмы о войне, снятые в СССР.
@ancientmariner74734 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm..."Mauser" rifle fitted with Lee Enfield No4 rifle parts: cocking piece, bolt, action, rear sight but with the magazine detached...... Firing up to nine successive rounds with insufficient time to reload the "Mauser" (which had a five round integral magazine...) Weren't there enough surplus Mausers after the War...?
@rancidpitts82434 жыл бұрын
Continuity blew it. Sometimes it's a Mauser K98 , other times it's a No.4. Enfield.
@tonybarnes91944 жыл бұрын
category: entertainment. it's a movie. and an amazing scene overall.
@ancientmariner74734 жыл бұрын
Tony Barnes You're quite right - in the grand scheme of things its irrelevant. The film is good. I'm just a bit pedantic, old and cantankerous!
@rogerdavies62264 жыл бұрын
movie majic guns
@rancidpitts82434 жыл бұрын
@@rogerdavies6226 yes, exactly. That is just like the scenes where the good guy is ambushed by 10 bad guys with automatic weapons and all miss, but with one sweep of his, he gets them all. Movie magic guns.
@fragmaka8 жыл бұрын
"Keep it up Buster"
@nutjob91004 жыл бұрын
I saw this a film back in the 80s there is 2 endings where this sailor gets a Victoria cross in one ending his mother is at Buckingham Palace reviving his medal the other he survives and is there with his proud mother. Such a well written film
@hoodoo200111 жыл бұрын
At around 8:00 his rifle changes from a German Mauser 98K 8MM to a British Enfield No. IV .303 rifle. The magic of filmmaking. Was the German rifle lost between filming? I really would like to see this complete film again, it's been about 25 or so years.
@Trimtank6 жыл бұрын
Did you mean a Lee-Enfield No.4? The rifle in the film is a Short Magazine Lee-Enfield Mk III. There was never a IV. Good catch though.
@davvvvo5 жыл бұрын
It could be that the Mauser's weren't reliable enough with blanks so they swapped to the Enfield's instead (for reference the movie Sergeant York had a Luger in place of a 1911 due to the problem of converting them to fire blanks).
@rancidpitts82434 жыл бұрын
I last saw this movies when there were only seven channels on TV in Los Angeles.
@noididnt79724 жыл бұрын
Seven channels? You were sh**ting in high cotton. In Sacramento in the '60's we had three channels and they went off at midnight after "High Flight". Of course they came back on around 6 AM with the farm report.
@rancidpitts82434 жыл бұрын
@@noididnt7972 I was working at McClellan in 1968. Bob Wilkinson on Saturday nights.
@WithTwoFlakes4 жыл бұрын
OMG, you were so lucky! Here in the UK we had only 3 channels until the imaginatively titled Channel4 launched in November 1982, (nineteen eighty two!).
@rancidpitts82434 жыл бұрын
@@WithTwoFlakes When I was last there, East Anglia, in 1981 the only thing watching was "Dr. Who" only because Tom Baker was so odd. Any more than four now?
@WithTwoFlakes4 жыл бұрын
@@rancidpitts8243 Yes, we have the usual hundreds of channels nowadays since TV went digital. Of course the dilution of advertising revenue and viewing figures across them all means nothing much in the way of decent new programs are made. It's all endless repeats. Only the BBC (public funding) seems to still be making the occasional half decent show. East Anglia you say? Im guessing lakenheath? mildenhall?
@scubaleotard4 жыл бұрын
At 3:04 he is aiming a mauser rifle, at 3:10 he is firing a Lee Enfield rifle.
@david97834 жыл бұрын
Man I noticed the same thing! Seems like they could have had him use the Mauser throughout. Plus,ddid you notice how fast he was popping off those rounds? Pretty fast for a bolt action.
@Fulton-wg2qo4 жыл бұрын
Pretty clearly carrying a K98 Mauser at 2:02 This guy trades guns faster than I do lol.
@awest60044 жыл бұрын
@@david9783 British infintry training included the Magic Minute for elite marksmen which required 20 rounds on target in 60 sec starting with 10 rounds in magazine which required two 5 round stripper clips to be added during session. Enfield SMLE had a very smooth and short bolt action. Not sure if the Royal Navy had such a program.
@david97834 жыл бұрын
@@awest6004 Thank you for that info.Do you feel his rate of fire was historically accurate?
@andrewbolay15174 жыл бұрын
Saw this years ago , very hard to track down . Thank you.
@dennispfeifer778821 күн бұрын
He keeps switching between the German 7.92x57mm K98 and the British .303 No. 4 Mark 1.
@Richard5004 жыл бұрын
The Dido class cruiser HMS Cleopatra plays both the fictional Royal Navy ships "HMS Amesbury" and "HMS Stratford".
@dougmoore43266 күн бұрын
Sorry, that is a US one man raft made for air crew, type LRU-3/P. It would not be on board a German ship
@jerometaperman710215 күн бұрын
Pretty rapid shooting with that bolt action rifle. He didn't bring near enough water and he should have worn a shirt. Good movie, though. Michael Rennie.
@azcop214 күн бұрын
In this clip, the British sailor is shooting two different rifles, a K98 and an Enfield. Clearly a gaffe.
@evam2es13 жыл бұрын
Very good clip from "Sailor of the King". Great movie, indeed...Thanks for posting!!!!
@tedjinla13 жыл бұрын
The best part of the movie is the sea battle where the Essen destroys HMS Amesbury. Its one one of the most accurate depictions of a ship to ship engagement ever filmed, including the lag between the flash of the guns and the boom. You should post that. Thanks for this. Thanks
@captainswoop87224 жыл бұрын
It's tosh. Watch Battle of the River Plate.
@deriter6410 жыл бұрын
The movie ended on an upbeat note but I found the grim irony of Brown On Resolution the most depressing thing Forester ever wrote.
@gordonfrickers55928 жыл бұрын
+deriter64 Forester was saying despite what many lefties and feminists say about western men, there are men who will do their duty, do what they think right, until death even if it means 'falling on their own sword'. The old word to describe that, now very un PC, very unfashionable and often derided is "duty". "As in "England expects that every man this day will do his duty".
@janvanv8 жыл бұрын
Plenty of lefties in all countries did their duty and fought for their countries..You seem to forget that the baddies were the very definition of as far right ultra nationalists as the world has ever seen..I have to wonder which side you think is right..
@johnberger28516 жыл бұрын
Yes, "lefties" fight for their countries just like "righties" do -- some willingly, some because the law says they have to, some because they're afraid of what will happen to them if they refuse.
@ziblot12356 жыл бұрын
janvanv That’s your leftist opinion.Most of the commies fought as partisans against German soldiers who were fighting for their country against the most evil regime of all time, Stalin. Stalin killed millions, Christians, Ukrainians who welcomed the German army and fought alongside them under Vlassov. History learned from Hollywood is always gonna be skewed.
@PaulBaird4 жыл бұрын
It is a bit boys own, isn’t it. Plucky Brit sailor single handedly delays warship. Doesn’t die of thirst or heat stress.
@vonmazur16 жыл бұрын
Which is it? No 4 MK 1, or a GEW 98K ?? Prop Dept screw ups...
@ks-eq3yx10 ай бұрын
Of course 'e will, he'll polish of Jerry our kid! .oy! Pass us a ' number chip little 'un. Magic days!
@cariboupetepeterson37118 жыл бұрын
He climbs ashore with a German Mauser and ends up shooting a British SMLE rifle????? WTF?
@tomgray22947 жыл бұрын
cariboupete Peterson Bull, he is firing 98K it just look like SMLE because of a strait camera shot
@dougbowser22087 жыл бұрын
No there are 2 different rifles.
@grantbernard30047 жыл бұрын
Yes, he is using a Lee Enfield no. 4 mk. 1 at 8:09
@vonmazur16 жыл бұрын
You are correct! First a GEW 98K, then a SMLE No.4 MK 1....Continuity screwed up!
@ericthered760Ай бұрын
The story location for the Essen's repair is in the Galapagos, but it was filmed in Malta.
@johnhorne2012 Жыл бұрын
Never ever fuck with our Canadien friends!...........we are shooters up here,..............
@astondriver3 жыл бұрын
Jeffrey Hunter was an excellent actor. Shame he died young
@jeffturnbull96613 жыл бұрын
I believe he died on June 6th, 1944, helping to push Bangalore torpedoes under a wall
@michaelmayfield43043 жыл бұрын
@@jeffturnbull9661 - not even close, he died May 27, 1969 from cerebral hemorrhage. He was Captain Pike on Star Trek in the 1960's
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
@@jeffturnbull9661 there's always one , sad !
@astondriver3 жыл бұрын
@@jeffturnbull9661 unfortunately a movie stunt went wrong and he died from effects of an explosion as @Michael Mayfield says, below. He was excellent in "The Searchers"
@andrewstackpool491111 ай бұрын
HMS MANXMAN with obviously studio prop.main armament
@gregwilliams38612 күн бұрын
I missed how his K 98 Mauser turned into a Lee Enfield No.4 mkI?
@tedthesailor172Ай бұрын
That German ship only looks to have 4 to 5-inch guns as main armament...
@dennismckown49513 ай бұрын
guess he doesnt know about the prickly cactus and its water content, not much would quench his thirst
@danjohnston34224 жыл бұрын
Quite the guy. He hauls a K98 all the way up the cliff, and then it magically transforms it into an Enfield when he shoots it. Shame about the continuity error.
@dongarrett62284 жыл бұрын
I bet the k98 wouldn't set off the dummy round......
@BobSmith-dk8nw4 жыл бұрын
Good Eye upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Lee-Enfield_No_4_Mk_I_%281943%29_-_AM.032027.jpg All the shots of him aiming the rifle (but not firing it) are of him with the Mauser - but when he is actually firing it and working the bolt - it's the No4. The giveaway is that rear sight location. My guess would be that they simply didn't have the ammunition type they wanted to use for the Mauser. .
@williamclifford44414 ай бұрын
Was this an adaptation of C.S. Forrester's Brown on Resolution?
@bandersnatch200513 жыл бұрын
This 1953 film is based on C.S Forester's WW1 nautical novel entitled " Brown on Resolution". John Mills starred in the 1935 vesion.
@shooterqqqq4 жыл бұрын
Born For Glory [1935]
@jessgatt5441Ай бұрын
Ooops on my part, the rifle in that film is an Enfield mk 4, oh well.
@petertaylor25016 күн бұрын
Mauser ammunition pouches seen when the ship opens up with her main armament.
@S25038513 жыл бұрын
Quite right, @bandersnatch2005. Thanks for adding this info.
@royperkins38516 жыл бұрын
Irony is if he'd consintrated on the officers he'd had a better effect German training stressed following orders if you cut out the officers and noncoms you destroy unit cohesion! Still hilarious to watch a one man army put a knot in their rope!
@KateLicker4 жыл бұрын
yeah, but Huns had pretty good noncoms, so you would have to cut all of those heads off the hydra before the rest of those sausage-eaters actually began acting like the stupid blockheads they are usually portrayed as in US/UK tv/movies..
@pnonnymouse48403 жыл бұрын
At the range with no optics i doubt he could identify rank, he must be at least 400 yards so just hitting at that range with iron sights is a fair shot, for a seaman.
@Don_Camillo4 жыл бұрын
Nice cruiser, but not German 😁 And have i seen right: Artillery against one (!) man ???
@westwindsailer4 жыл бұрын
The German raider was the HMS Manxmann a fast minelayer
@mineown1861Ай бұрын
With gunnery like that it's no surprise they lost the war .
@brianwinters54344 жыл бұрын
A lopsided battle. A mauser 98 k vs a cruiser.
@deadhorse13914 жыл бұрын
Brian Winters well he did manage to find an Enfield to use 😃
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
Yes, that's the whole point of the movie . One determined man who is welling to sacrifice he's life , can make all the difference to the outcome.
@QED_6 жыл бұрын
Full movie: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iV6cf6J5q82Sd5Y
@oscarharriet70304 жыл бұрын
Carries a Mauser up the hill and then does all his shooting closeups with a No4 Lee Enfield?
@shelonnikgrumantov50615 күн бұрын
I would hide a boat if I were him.
@drjohnson984 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing this film on TV fifty years or more ago when I was a kid. It stuck with me for some reason. Never knew the title until now.
@davehine33994 жыл бұрын
Same here drjohnson98. Have been trying to find out what that movie was that I remembered seeing as a kid.
@martinmiller10874 жыл бұрын
The plot is from C.S. Forester's book 'Brown On Resolution.' It's a great read from an incredible writer and has my highest recommendation. Enjoy!
@DOLRED10 жыл бұрын
This movie and "Pursuit of the Graf Spee" (American Title) are two of my favorite war movies. Interesting comment below on the gun used by Hunter. In the Graf Spee movie, German Sailors on the Graf Spee wore American Helmets because an American warship was used as the Graf Spee. At the time of filming, The US Navy would not allow German war symbols on the ship (So I learned). In this movie, The Brits call the German Ship "Essen" a "Raider." This is what the pocket Battleship Graf Spee really was.
@mikeroby13137 жыл бұрын
The cruiser USS Salem (CA-139) was the stand-in.
@KateLicker4 жыл бұрын
powerful enough guns to outshoot any ship fast enough to catch it, too fast for those powerful enough to destroy them...that was the jingle of Admiral Scheer class.Internal combustion engines like a U-boat instead of boilers and turbines, equals a little slower than a steamship might have been but 10000km cruising endurance? Originally there was one named 'Deutschland"...why a mere 6X11" ship got named for the nation is unclear, but Hitler worried, 'what if a ship named for the nation is sunk?" so , it was renamed Lutzow.. After that huge build-up and suspense on the final day as Spee sailed out of Montevideo, Langsdorf cheats us all of the big climax fight by scuttling the fucking thing. From memory the force waiting for him was barely any more powerful than the one he had effectively seen off previously.Cumberland instead of Exeter, the two banged up 5.9" cruisers, and --maybe-- an aircraft carrier whose CAG, probably a dozen Swordfish if you are lucky , would have had insufficient striking power against large warships anyway to make any effective participation certain, so would have mostly been standing and watching the gunboats settle it.
@iansnell88973 жыл бұрын
Known as the Battle of the River Plate in the rest of the world. I think INS Delhi ex HMNZS achiles played herselff
@jimc-w93123 жыл бұрын
That ship looks like The Manxman with fake turrets. HMS Manxman was a fast mine layer with 3 stacks
@andrewstackpool49113 жыл бұрын
It is HMS Manxman; once the RN's fastest ship. She was out in the Far East in the late 60s.
@davidchampkin5999 Жыл бұрын
Yes it's the mamxman with some strange turrets added.Also one of the germans brown shoots who is climbing up the rocks is my Uncle Fred . He was a real sailor of the king who served on the Manxman
@tembot63634 жыл бұрын
Started from mauser then changed to a number 4 smle
@johnberger28516 жыл бұрын
Question 1: Does any one remember why Brown didn't take his shirt with him along with the rifle and ammunition? Question 2: Given his relatively limited amount of ammunition doesn't he seem to be shooting it off at a pretty rapid rate? Two or three rounds would have sufficed to scare off the Germans when they went back out to resume repairs but he shot significantly more than two or three. Question 3: Was there no way for the Germans to turn the ship around, even if it required briefly going back out into the open ocean? Brown would have had a long and dangerous climb/crawl to a new firing position. Question 4: Should the Germans have landed their counter-sniper group immediately to hunt Brown instead of waiting as long as they did? I like the movie much more than the (original) book.
@pnonnymouse48403 жыл бұрын
One its a film . They needed to show off the beefcake. But yes its silly as he rowed ashore instead of swimming. Two its a film the rifle does not need to be reloaded just like a lot of the cowboy sixshooters firing ten to twenty shot, also to show more shots and the rate of fire is high for long range rifle shots but he does have a full bandolier of ammo. But yes its a bit far fetched. And has been pointed out in other comments the rifle changes from shot to shot being in one a British in the next German. Three its a film in the original book they had to go into a sheltered cove to repair the damage to the ship because they had to make the ship unseaworthy by raising the damaged side out of the water heeling the ship over onto its sides. In order to repair the damage which would normally underwater. Making moving whilst damaged extremely risky or impossible. In the film they do not really show this or explain it very well. They need the shelter of the cove as they cannot take the risk in the open sea , as the ship might capsize due to the waves. So they cannot move it until repaired Four yes they should have sent out a search part much sooner.
@mer2winable7 жыл бұрын
I saw this movie when I was a kid. I don't remember the title then and I wanted to watch it again. All I could remember from the movie was the scene of Jeffrey Hunter shooting Germans on a ship from a hill. I finally found a DVD copy from a Barnes and Noble bookstore. It is nice to watch it time and again.
@KentHaughton2 жыл бұрын
Another WW II Great is The Birdmen
@jeffsmith20224 жыл бұрын
Plywood turrets?...
@bigbob169910 ай бұрын
Another one of my father's favorite movies.
@billhuber29644 жыл бұрын
I saw this when I was a kid. Anything navy got my attention , equal and undivided.
@hamerdow13 жыл бұрын
Always good to see Jeffrey Hunter with his shirt off.
@pdm32843 жыл бұрын
It's very interesting to read the book (Brown on Resolution) and then watch the movie. The move has a completely different and positive ending.
@vincentharriman32834 ай бұрын
There were two endings filmed. One sees him die while the other sees him live. Audiences at the cinema were asked to vote which ending they preferred. Overall the voting was in favour of where he lives.
@pdm32844 ай бұрын
@@vincentharriman3283 Didn't know that. Thanks.
@carlcurtice79143 жыл бұрын
That is some seriously fast bolt action shooting
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
A trained man, would be able to fire at that speed accurately with a Lee-Enfield rifle .
@jessgatt5441Ай бұрын
You may now learn of the power and accuracy of the K-98-K Mauser rifle. I own one, quite the rifle it is.
@masoudkarimi396616 күн бұрын
اسم فیلم چیست؟
@gerrynightingale90453 жыл бұрын
*First...I don't believe in shooting unarmed sailors doing their jobs they've been ordered to do* *Next...why shoot the men?* *SHOOT THE GAS CYLINDERS!* ( *They surely don't have an unlimited supply of gas tanks aboard, and if he can hit a man at that range, he can hit a cylinder that doesn't move at all* ) *Last...never shoot from the same position after the first shots have been fired* *Even moving a few yards will be sufficient to 'throw them off-target'
@Diogenes42511 ай бұрын
1 sniper. Aim small miss small.
@ryanbluer6098Ай бұрын
A really great classic with noticeable movie mistakes, like the rife keeps changing and I’m sure he would not have taken one canteen of water when he escaped.
@charlesphillips14687 ай бұрын
Lotta ammo to waste on one man.
@williamclifford44414 ай бұрын
C.S. Forrester was fascinated by detail and logistics. In the book this film is based upon in particular how small things can alter the path of history. Brown's father, who Brown had never met, commands the British Fleet which will destroy the Essen.
@ogden70010 ай бұрын
Based on the book "Brown on Resolution" by C.S. Forester I would imagine...
@davidinsvaz788311 ай бұрын
Now, I could never understand how a rack of Mauser rifles and a Mauser bandoleer (leather) could turn into a Brit #4 Enfield. Ammo not nearly the same.
@sergeyleopard887217 күн бұрын
Какая хрень!
@terry93254 ай бұрын
The only thing I find at fault with this film is ,why didn’t just swing the ship round ? He would have had to round the other side of the island to shoot .
@deafsmith10063 жыл бұрын
How did he get ahold of that No. 4, MK 1 .303 rifle? Earlier it was a Mauser 7.92... then a No. 4.. then a Mauser... weird.
@JohnnieE196110 ай бұрын
One of those films that gives the impression a couple of our blokes in a pedalo could have sunk the German navy and marched into Berlin for the surrender in a week.
@jessgatt230610 ай бұрын
Anyone notice that the rifle he's shooting is a British Enfield Mk-4?? I did.
@rogueriderhood18623 жыл бұрын
Continuity error. Curiously when Brown is climbing up the mountain he is carrying a Mauser Kar 98K, in the close ups when he is shown firing the rifle it is a Lee-Enfield No.4.
@mikebryant81224 жыл бұрын
The 1935 film is "Forever England." Both it and "Sailor of the King" are here on Utube, currently (2020). The ship in "Forever England" is steam/coal powered, and there are interesting scenes to do with that. And British-y things like a bit of storyline to do with Admiral Horatio Nelson. I think John Mills is more effective in a way, as he is quite young, not seeming a potential hero at first, or Hollywood dreamboat. But he's got pluck! Glad to have seen both films.
@jasoncohen74439 жыл бұрын
where can I watch the full movie.................its a great film
@S2503859 жыл бұрын
It was uploaded on YT some time ago, but was taken down due to copyright issues. It is available both on DVD (region 1) and Blu-ray (see Amazon etc).
@jasoncohen74439 жыл бұрын
thank you
@ziblot12356 жыл бұрын
This is a remake of the John Mills flick.lmit is supposed to take place during WW1. NotWw2.
Jeffrey Hunter went on to portray Jesus in "The Greatest Story Ever Told" and met an untimely death when he fell down stairs in his home and broke his neck.
@Renshen19578 жыл бұрын
After being the Captain of the Enterprise in the first Star Trek pilot which he turned down the part.
@henryzammitcordina28007 жыл бұрын
You have the wrong film . Jesus was played by Max Von Sydow in The Greatest Story Ever Told . Jeffrey Hunter played Jesus in King of Kings
@KateLicker4 жыл бұрын
I had no idea that's what happened to him.. so, kind of what happened to John Wayne's character in that WW2 USN aircraft-carrier movie..except he survives into a wheel-chair.. Hunter did two good Pacific war movies that I know of. the slightly biographical "Hell to Eternity"..and 'No Man is an Island"...
@astridvallati47623 жыл бұрын
Have seen both versions of the story.In this one, Hunter gets about with a German Kar98k ( the ship's rack has long Gew98 !) But the close-ups of firing are Rifle No.4!!! OC gun aficionado
@johnhall94763 жыл бұрын
rather liked the original film Forever England with john mills this is a good copy but still not as good
@paulsteele61203 жыл бұрын
In the book this film was based on the hero ends up dead. Liberties taken by the film industry with literature, a common practise.
@stevek88294 жыл бұрын
Why clips? Isn't a 1953 movie past its copyright period.
@azcop23 жыл бұрын
In these scenes the seaman switches from shooting an Enfield to a Mauser. Not sure where he would have gotten an Enfield on a German ship.
@tihomirtomov2516 күн бұрын
Early fantastic from 1953 !
@victorboucher6753 жыл бұрын
Mausers w/o sight hoods ... and magically changes into a SMLE when shooting.