SAMSUNG S95B QD-OLED OR SONY A95K WAIT FOR THE SONY!

Never judge a TV by a KZbin video here in this video I give you the perfect example of the reasons why not.

[@fadetoblack.-]

paypal.me/fadetoblackcom

[@gilbelieve5756]

Please fix the problem on your PayPal account I'm trying to send you money and getting the message this recipient is currently... Tanks

[@fadetoblack.-]

@@gilbelieve5756 working on it my friend 🥂

[@mrcobbynot]

I got my 55” s95b yesterday from Amazon and was super excited to see it. Got it set up yesterday afternoon and watched it for 6 hrs on different types of content. I have a LG C X 65”. My friend has a 65 A80j. All TVs uncalibrated. For hdr KZbin test stuff s95b is cool looking but color is noticeably off but can be adjusted down of course. After adjusting s95b then watching 6 hrs of mixed content l rate as this Light cannon brightest tv S95b Best picture watching shows not movies with hdr Sony A80j. That processing rocks. Clear and 3D like Movies hdr Sony Gaming SDR Lg Gaming hdr Samsung Best all around tv is Sony

[@dy1497]

What about dark scenes (coming out of darks) on streaming/lower bitrate stuff on the s95B? I have the CX and love it but find that darker scenes especially on NON 4k DISKS can be noisy/blotchy on lower source material like streaming and some SDR stuff which seems to be common on WOLEDS....

[@mrcobbynot]

@@dy1497 my cx is Blotchy on SDR dark scenes as well. My s95b does not . It’s clear of blotchyness on dark scenes on all types of content Sdr . If this TV upscaled and Processed Lorez stuff and SDR stuff like the Sony does this TV would be unstoppable. The problem is the peoples faces looks basically blurry on low rez stuff. 1080 p sucks on this TV no doubt about it. That’s it’s only weakness but it’s a huge weakness compared to a Sony picture which was the tv l was going to buy before this came on to the scene.

[@dy1497]

@@mrcobbynot ok thanks so much for your reply. I've been wondering this about the new qd oled and whether near dark was scenes especially on lower bitrate stuff look blotchy/ noisy/ artifacty like they do on my CX which was the only dissapointment coming from LED which never showed this. I'm really curious what the Sony will be like and hoping a 77inch comes out eventually so I can replace the CX in a few years down the line.

[@LukeMtech55]

I understand what your saying but like you said the camera used to record these videos aren't the best representation of the actual picture quality. I'm gonna reserve judgement until I see one in person.

[@mrcobbynot]

Damm l just watched ratatouille on Disney on my S95b and it blew me away. Ok l might end up keeping this tv after all

[@NexGenTek]

Truly it's new technology 91% of Rec 2020 is unheard of. 1500 nits. Gaming is undefeated. I have the tv and haven't seen anything like it. It's like seeing OLED for the first time again. You don't always need an accurate picture that's always going to be an opinion. If accurate looked dull and lifeless compared to a tv that wasn't accurate for the sake of reference would you go for it.

[@supremetaaanxz2241]

I’ve seen you pushing this narrative on a few vids now 🤣 you proud?

[@NexGenTek]

@@supremetaaanxz2241 Proud of Samsung's engineering this year yes. Cleanest and brightest oled panel I've ever seen. All Sony and LG Oleds have had this grid shit that I could never get over and dim so yea I am.

[@isayasbashiri5371]

@@NexGenTek you're appealing to your emotions now.

[@NexGenTek]

@@isayasbashiri5371 They're real. See for yourself then tell me different.

[@chinkc96kc]

Why do we automatically assume that sony will be better Is it because of the picture accuracy and better processor Don't forget this TV cost a $1000 more Isn't worth it I'm not sure right now

[@arx117]

There's another channel recommend Samsung over Sony. Sony price tag didn't justified its quality build. Both can be calibrated to make it good and Samsung has the same quality picture as Sony with cheaper price tag

[@justinhaley6495]

@@arx117 yall keep mentioning calibration but 90% of people aren’t that knowledgeable to do it or would want to do it most people work with what the tv produces out of box therefore sony is better and not to mention better picture quality and detail hence the xr processor and google tv os beats out tizen. Last but not least build quality my samsung tv experience they usually malfunction sony on the other hand is top tier for build quality so yeah 🤷🏽‍♂️ Sony is and will be better

[@alex46801]

oh God, you're taking advice from QTV, why don't you guys do your own research. Wait for the Sony to come out and then make your decision. Go look at both TV'S and make your own judgement. The reason why people thinks the Sony is better is because of Sony's proven processor and the heatsinks, which obviously will cost more. Heat is the number one cause of degradation in electronics so figure it out that heatsinks should at the very least prolong your panel life. At best, the panel can display brighter pictures for longer periods without damaging effects.

[@ericvaughan11]

I know lot of TV enthusiast like your self don't understand all the hype over the S95B vs Sony OLED. But you have to remember that when it comes to TV's the purist that would only own the most accurate looking TV and must have a calibrated set to get that accuracy is a very, very small niche group. My contention is that probably 98% or more of people that buy TV's don't ever calibrate them for one and don't really care if their set is the most accurate. They just love seeing beautiful vibrant picture that they can enjoy, period. Samsung knows this and that is why they target that group and therefore sell more TV's than anyone else. Sony on other hand targets the more towards the high end enthusiast like yourself and that is why their TV's cost so much more is because they know they aren't going to sell near as many TV's as someone like Samsung. Sony also probably puts little higher quality into their sets. But Sony is successful also because of that. So like Kwesi Williams said so well below in his comment, there is not right or wrong just what people prefer.

[@fadetoblack.-]

Thanks for the novel!🥂little do you know I love Samsung TVs for gaming.

[@ManuelMedellin.]

A95K is where the money's at. Watch guys like QuantumTV trying to bash Sony once again, he seems to pick a random favorite TV each year just to oppose the best TV (which is * surprise* again a Sony) 😂

[@michaellubeck8464]

X95K review from a buyer -I notice both extreme strengths on the X95, like watching youtube 4K and 8k videos, which are mostly mind blowing....also, when watching the news and even commercials, when it shows typed fonts from computer screens like the weather forecast, writing on a white background, the image is second to none - absolutely mind blowing..but I feel the people in the newsroom or commercials and video when watching the news, could be significantly sharper, and that is a bit of a let down..I think the news is coming in at least High Definition resolution if not 4K resolution, but it could be a sharper image....my 2018 Sony 900f might actually be sharper while watching the news...I love my 900f as EVERYTHING looks very sharp on it, while the X95 is somewhat dull looking in one scene, and then seconds later. I'm blown away by a different image...I know I spent a lot of time calibrating the TV settings on the X95 yesterday ...I usually watch TV in Vivid Mode, the brightest mode to watch TV on from any manufacturer..I was a bit disappointed that vivid mode while watching most TV programs looks a bit ridiculous on the X95K because all the blacklists turn on and the image is way too milky white to watch like that, so I have to change the picture setting to Standard, which in theory reduces the brightness, but not by much on the X95, although that depends what you're watching...I also unfortunately notice judder while watching motion/panning videos on youtube and haloing around bright lights

[@ManuelMedellin.]

@@michaellubeck8464 QD OLED over Mini LED any day, bro. S95B and A95K take the crown this year

[@michaellubeck8464]

@@ManuelMedellin. the thing is i already have the C1 Oled and i didn't another 1000 nit TV that's not much brighter or punchier than my Lg C1 - i didn't need a new TV as i had 2...what i wanted was the sharpness of my amazing Son y900f but even way sharper and far brighter...what I am seeing is a washed out image on my X95K..i think even the X90 might be sharper..i'm sorry but the image just isn't sharp on the X95K unless i put on LG demo mode, which is truly mind blowing and youtube 4K/8K videos look pretty amazing as well....

[@ManuelMedellin.]

@@michaellubeck8464 should have gotten the G2 I guess.... but again QD OLED is on another level, superior over both WRGB Oled as well as Mini LED, the perfect combination and best of both worlds, and that's a fact and every Reviewer will confirm that.

[@midmassguy]

Great video fade i learned the hard way when looking at a Led on KZbin bought it used well you know the rest. I'm spending my hard earned money on a set i want accuracy, over' blown out colors. great video for us people that are fooled into the marketing scheme.🥂

[@RagingGrinch-TechGaming]

This is why I like my C1 the colors r more accurate the S95B is like using vivid mode the colors r to over saturated but some like that for me I’m jealous of the brightness only which I can hold off till early next year for the LG C3 that will push 1200 nits or higher on the G3

[@alanlindsay8310]

Some of the big youtubers have gone on record to say that they don't like the look of a calibrated image. They like the type of image Samsung offers. That's fine but they'll never come forward and say the set is inaccurate. Just it's the best image they've ever seen. And they'll say anyone else not agreeing and actually showing the general public that it's not perfect they get upset at and start targeting those people. It really shows of how creditable they are as reviewers honestly. It's easy. It's the best looking Samsung TV ever. Done. That's simple. Is it the best looking TV ever? Clearly not for those that want accuracy. That all they have to say to be unbiased.

[@fadetoblack.-]

Good observation please like and subscribe.🥂

[@fadetoblack.-]

By the way having a Lott of subscribers does not make you the most knowledgeable person out there. Investigate some of those KZbinrs backgrounds and you’ll find that they came from a computer and gaming Background predominantly.

[@NeverTalkToCops1]

"Best image I've ever seen." So, we bow down and worship ONE guy claiming stuff, NO SCIENCE or just pseudo science. "Best potato I've ever tasted".

[@carlcat]

Just came back from the electronics store and saw the Samsung S95B for the first time. Although it looked great it was not that much greater than the other OLEDS there...........surely not enough to forsake a 77" TV. Right next to the Samsung QD was a Samsung QN90B MINI LED which I thought looked a lot better for the great majority of scenes. The only time the QD looked better were in very dark night or space scenes.

[@fadetoblack.-]

Thanks for your input please like and subscribe if you’re not already.🥂

[@ThePenhalionsPost]

I had the exact opposite reaction but, I compared two 65 inch sets side by side. The QD-OLED had better contrast than the mini led but the mini led got brighter. This also seemed to start washing out the colours a bit. The colour on the oled is more intense , reds especially. Both were in vivid mode and set for shop display. The oled is way cleaner than the mini led and ironically cheaper to boot. As far as I could tell they are both using the exact same chipset.

[@carlcat]

@@ThePenhalionsPost That was pretty much my experience, the QD had better contrast but the Mini was brighter.

[@Watermoehlen]

I would rather have a tv that is accurate to the $30k reference monitor not a tv that’s bright because it can be

[@rahb2096]

Nah I'm good on reference keep that dim picture to yourself

[@alex46801]

Lol, Samsung fanboys, if it wasn't for lg oled, Samsung would probably still be selling nothing but lcd.

[@rahb2096]

@@alex46801 yea cause samsung wasn't making 9 million oled phone panels a month back in 2013. Are you 12?

[@alex46801]

@@rahb2096 I'm not 12, but you argue like one. True, Samsung made millions of shitty oled phones all with burn in just like the Note that I'm typing on. But that didn't mean they were going to make TV's out of them and you couldn't comprehend that I was referring to LCD TVs. They even criticized oled and promoted their Qled. Seeing how LG market share keeps growing and the positive reviews on OLEDs year after year, Samsung now knows OLEDs is the future besides MicroLED. So yeah, you could've been enjoying your QD-oled a few years sooner son, had Samsung went through with their OLEDs back in 2013.

[@rahb2096]

@@alex46801 lgs market share is tiny lol you're clueless

[@gilbelieve5756]

Hi I know how much important is for you that the picture on your tv will be presenting real life color's and lighting the new Samsung is qd-oled is not thre yet wach Vincent new review. I love your honesty and the way you present stuff tank you. Why you selling your TV 📺?

[@alex46801]

😂😂😂 Vincent brought the hype rocket back down to Earth and the fanboys damage controlling now, good old Vincent not to run with the crowd

[@janduller4722]

@@loki76 excactly, gamemode on lg oled looks also not accurate and way to dim. that`s the issue of the wrgb oleds. samsung is better. and you cant ajust the picture quality that is matched the 100 accuracy

[@icemanandbobtechandgaming]

I sure hope the A95K lives up to the hype, because people feel too comfortable that it will be perfect, only going off of Vincent’s video as well as only KZbin videos. I have the S95B and in person it’s amazing. All cameras are struggling to capture it’s brightness and blacks in person (the camera will either blow out the whites and etc, or under represent what we see in person as this isn’t an issue with past tvs). I suspect the A95K will struggle on camera also. I’m sure the A95K will be amazing also, but it will have its flaws as all tvs do including Sony. Also about the accuracy, the S95B can be adjusted to track way more accurately. Vincent also isn’t the only calibrator who checked the S95B, plus no one has calibrated it yet since we’re all breaking them in. It’s no where near as bad as people who never saw the tv in person are making it. Either way, no tv should be judged solely on KZbin. You must see all these tvs in person first.

[@alex46801]

Doesn't matter if Vincent is sponsored by LG or not. The fact is he exposed Samsung and it wasn't even that big of a deal and he even praised qdoled. But people and reviewers who bought the TV are losing their sht and getting all defensive when it was about Samsung's ploy to take advantage of reviewers test pattern. The fact that nobody else caught this means that they're secretly on Samsung's payroll???

[@alex46801]

Yup, 100% hyped up for the A95K lol

[@janduller4722]

@@alex46801 people feel too comfortable that it will be perfect, only going off of Vincent’s video as well as only KZbin videos. I have the S95B and in person it’s amazing. All cameras are struggling to capture it’s brightness and blacks in person (the camera will either blow out the whites and etc, or under represent what we see in person as this isn’t an issue with past tvs). I suspect the A95K will struggle on camera also. I’m sure the A95K will be amazing also, but it will have its flaws as all tvs do including Sony. Also about the accuracy, the S95B can be adjusted to track way more accurately. Vincent also isn’t the only calibrator who checked the S95B, plus no one has calibrated it yet since we’re all breaking them in. It’s no where near as bad as people who never saw the tv in person are making it. Either way, no tv should be judged solely on KZbin. You must see all these tvs in person first.

[@YavNe]

It's called QD-OLED, not QOLED.

[@ericlarsen6209]

Will be a heavy weight fight!

[@dtbrown1978]

Yeah I don't have a doubt that Sony QD oled will be better but over $1k better is unlikely. The Samsung calibrated can be 95% + accurate. And the Samsung will be good for 99% of consumers. Still excited to see the Sony though.

[@nyquil07na38]

I think one issue Sony may have an issue with this year is the Nit rating vs the Samsung. With that said lack of DV is a deal breaker for me. I got an A80J last year. I will wait a year move the A80 upstairs and buy qd-oled next year. I like my A80 but it's dim looking. This panel tech is def on it's last leg.

[@micdoses1]

Sony for the 🏆

[@mrcobbynot]

I’m sending my S95 b back because it’s not a clear looking picture like Sony. The colors can be adjusted down from cartoon level but nothing can fix the awful SDR picture processing on this tv.Also for fuck sake it took me forever to figure out how to change the input. Getting a 77 A80j for a few hundred bucks more than this 55 s95b.

[@rahb2096]

Awful decision

[@supremetaaanxz2241]

Wonderful decision. A80J is a wonderful television

[@NexGenTek]

🤦🏾‍♂️Worst decision!

[@mrcobbynot]

Hey man if you went too a steak house and ordered the best steak on the menu and it wasn’t cooked all the way and you sent it back would that be such an awful decision? The S95b isn’t cooked all the way bro. That’s pretty common for first gen technology. Samsung display created some kick ass tech but Samsung TV division doesn’t have the chief’s in their kitchens that know how to prepare it correctly yet. I’m sending mine back this weekend and getting the Tenderloin

[@rahb2096]

@@mrcobbynot super bad analogy rhe best steaks aren't cooked all the way 🤨 a better analogy would be ordering a filet mignon complaining it's not cooked all the way and then ordering a meatloaf

[@ericlarsen6209]

A95k

[@kwesiwilliams1188]

You say "if it's not accurate then who cares what the picture looks like"? My answer to that is the millions of ppl that buy Samsung televisions which make Samsung the number one seller of televisions in the world. Lol!!! We need to take feelings out of the equation and understand that accuracy only matters in life and death situations such as giving grandma the right amount of insulin. Televisions are just inanimate objects that show a picture to the ppl that are watching. There's no right or wrong way to watch a movie or game on a television screen. If you like what you purchased, then keep it and enjoy it. Ppl shouldn't buy because someone is telling them the only correct way to view a picture is based off of "accuracy". What if "accuracy" to Mrs. Livingston looks dull and boring? I would always choose a LG or Samsung over Sony only because they have a use case for everyone. I mean Sony charges thousands more and for what? Picture accuracy and processing. Lol!!! They are just getting things right with VRR. LG C series was the best all around televisions in the OLED space and now Samsung will most likely take that crown in the QD-OLED space. In the end, just like there is no wrong way to eat a reeses, there's no wrong way to watch television or play video games.

[@fadetoblack.-]

My TV and I currently own Is calibrated by one of the best calibrator’s here in the United States. Yes I say it’s not accurate and so do a hell of a lot of other people thanks for the novel however. I love Samsung TVs for gaming.🥂