Saturn & Jupiter: Celestron PowerSeeker 127EQ Vs. Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ - Stunning Comparison

[@ebudemir]

Very nice and effective comparison thank you.. But it seems like 127eq has better images? Or is it me not being able to understand?

[@TheInvisibleOrange26]

It’s smaller so less light so you will se detail if you manually sim the 130eq on your phone it will be better detail

[@RayZin]

The mirror in the Astro master is spherical compared to parabolic on the 127eq. Parabolic is better

[@itzdracen]

No bro it's his camera lol his camera is the best quality pictures 😂😂😂 u can get that images through this camera lol

[@robertsonsid]

@@RayZin The Powerseeker 127EQ is spherical as well but the scope is Bird Jones.

[@robertsonsid]

It's surprising the Bird Jones Powerseeker 127EQ had more details than the 130. Both have spherical mirrors. I wonder if this collimation was better in the 127? Did you try stacking the video?

[@mezoooadel]

What app did you use to find them? And did you use the original stuff come in the pkg with 127EQ?

[@javarjv]

Oh man, and you do telescope comparisons too, that is awesome that you do side by side real comparisons, it is so difficult to find a serious telescope for adults for under 400 that is actually decent, Everything keeps coming back to- if you want the best, go for a 8 inch dobsonian, or a skywatcher heritage 150mm, Even with it being a lot more budget friendly you are hardly getting any real distance with the table top, and the full size dob is like $600 to $800 ish bucks, way to pricey for a first telescope, i mean yeah it may last, but it is very difficult to convince oneself to spend that much when you don't even know if you are going to like it, even with the interest and hype for doing it, But when you know that basically the dob is the best, well so many claim it is anyway, it is also very difficult for me to buy something else with so many mixed thing's being said about them, And knowing there is one's with some cool features like the app to guide you, the optional automated one's, But seeing these side by side shows me that the astromaster 130 really doesn't look that bad, it actually looks pretty decent. I would love to see more great telescopes compared but i know that has to be very expensive, I wish they would lower the prices of these thing's a bit & maybe more people would get into it, cause damn the buy in is very high.

[@motusprimus8785]

I have several scopes of different sizes but my Grab and go, the scope I will choose above anything else, Is my Orion Apex 127mm mak-cassegrain. I will take it over any 8' scope I have and if i am using anything below 10" it will be the Apex 127. Focal length is not brutal for a mak. It is clear and sharp. Its cooldown is a bit of a pain I admit that, but that is the only downside I have with the scope. It is the most under recognized scope I have ever used. I am not lying when I tell you I will use it before my 8" dob. It is every bit as good at DSO and superior on planets.

[@oscaracosta5312]

Sorry I don't belive that . Diferent focal lenght can not give us that kind of similar images .

[@muhammadizwan1545]

For your suggestion which one better sir ? I decide to buy one

[@Pracitcalscience]

You can go for Astromaster 130eq as it have slightly bigger aperture than Powerseeker.

[@muhammadizwan1545]

@@Pracitcalscience tq sir but it can capture deep sky ?

[@Pracitcalscience]

Best results for deep space objects, try celestron NexStar 8se

[@runinfinitygames1026]

yo tengo el Celestron 130 EQ y no se ve asi de grande Saturno en el telescopio. lo veo algo así de ese tamaño. los lentes son los que tienen un nombre raro PÖSSL algo asi son los lentes que uso y eso que tengo tambien la Barlow x2 combinada con la de 10mm pero se ve pequeño de todas maneras. Que podra ser?

[@mrresearch5237]

Para verlo mas grande necesitarias un telescopio con mayor apertura ADEMAS de un cielo con un buen seeing para poder poner muchos aumentos, cosa que no siempre se puede hacer. Tienes un buen telescopio, disfruta de lo que te ofrece

[@CSesmeroP]

La razón es muy sencilla. Este vídeo es un Fake. Yo también tengo el 130EQ y es imposible ver Júpiter en ese tamaño ni con una Barlow 2X de calidad y un 5mm Imagina con el 127, que es mucho peor telescopio.

[@143maverick]

Can you explain how you got same magnification with 10mm eyepiece where as the focal length of the telescope differs by almost 300mm 😮

[@menacingthunder]

Hey, I was planning to buy the StarSense DX130AZ telescope. Will I be able to see the details of the planets properly if I view it directly through the eyepiece? Or does it look the same as what you’ve shown in the video, through your iPhone?

[@mrresearch5237]

Thas a great telescope!. Saturn looks better than what you see on this video, Jupiter looks similar to the image of the astromaster but better. You wont be disapointed

[@djhpofficial934]

It's good for deepsky and good for some planets aswell

[@PetkaOfficial]

How do you get that upclose with it? I cant get anywhere near that

[@ulisessolis3182]

You can use a 10 or 12 mm eyepiece and a 2x Barlow. Or a single eyepiece around 6mm

[@PetkaOfficial]

@@ulisessolis3182 I tried that before but it can't get close enough to look like that

[@ulisessolis3182]

@@PetkaOfficial probably your telescope is not collimated

[@PetkaOfficial]

@@ulisessolis3182 if it's collimated it will show It like how you showed?

[@ulisessolis3182]

@@PetkaOfficial if it's well collimated Jupiter will look like the image of the astromaster. If you have the Powerseeker this video could hel you kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZ-rdqqEjrSCnbM

[@ameerali_]

Which one will fit for iPhone 13 Pro Max

[@redfluff48]

both

[@путьвкосмос]

странно почему цвет разный) так еще и кратность не соотвествует окулярам , видео видимо с других телескопов а это просто фейк

[@AstroFiller]

do you have goto?

[@Massi.casetta]

I should get one of the two telescopes to observe the solar system, which one do you recommend?

[@juanateutle6151]

El powerseeker 127 eq

[@greenyproductions371]

the astromaster 130 eq, the powerseeker 127 eq has a bad mount and poor collimation. while the astromaster 130 eq has a better mount and a permanent perfectly placed on finderscope and has great collimation, both are good beginner telescope but the astromaster 130eq has better magnification.

[@saketh.j2450]

​@@greenyproductions371 But in the video above it showing much worse of Jupiter as compared to 127 eq ???

[@greenyproductions371]

If you optimise the celestron astromaster 130eq, it will magnify the telescope 2x better than the celestron powerseeker 127eq.

[@saketh.j2450]

@@greenyproductions371 okay actually I want to buy a new telescope so which one will u suggest around 20-30k Indian rupee ??

[@mainmchoonjoismeayaahoon8922]

Nice bro 👍

[@Pracitcalscience]

Thank you 🙏

[@mainmchoonjoismeayaahoon8922]

Nice bro 👍