its times like these when i wish i lived in europe this citroen has like amazing handling for a front-drive car WOW.
@LawrenceTimme Жыл бұрын
Classic KZbin video from 2006. Amazing 😊
@PutinIsKing8 жыл бұрын
Getting a Saxo VTS Special Swiss Edition with a Compressor ! 6.3 sec 0-100 In 2016 ! My first car guys! I'm so in love! :D
@marfrandema18846 жыл бұрын
Darko Hugo nice car but it was a widowmaker
@saxovts4 жыл бұрын
And me 5.9 with 140hp and 13.59 gearbox ..
@Baskentli14 жыл бұрын
that is pretty good. I love hot hatchbacks, economical, good handling, brakes and performance, affordable prices.
@bolonia314 жыл бұрын
El saxo y su suspensión genial lo amo
@01Jelen1012 жыл бұрын
Great test, great car and great driver. :)
@skylinedrag15 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Saxo VTS has better acceleration than poor 8,9s
@hellonpluto17 жыл бұрын
phase 1 VTSs had those wheels on it, the phase 2 had the ones you're thinking of. Saxos rule!
@JohnSmith-lb6ww3 жыл бұрын
My vtr got 14s
@garrodius31479 ай бұрын
my phase 2 has those wheels too
@rumble29114 жыл бұрын
@antonyr123, Yeah i never said there were going to be quicker! VTS's are alot quicker as they have a 16v engine with 20bhp more and a different box. Well its a n/a 1.6 its not gonna be stupidly quick unless forced induction was used! Its not as fast as alot of cars in a straight line but the 106 gti (which is the same chassis as the VTR/VTS) was voted second best handling in some top gear episode and it was against ferraris and shit. handling > power (where i live anyways)
@dannyDC214 жыл бұрын
@deviljamez 0-60 in my VTS, and i would say all VTS's is much lower than that, easily less than 7 seconds..
@hellonpluto16 жыл бұрын
vts mate. Phase 1 VTS had the same wheels as Phase 1 VTR. The Phase 2 VTS has different wheels but the Phase 2 VTR has the same wheels as the Phase 1.
@2009Nez13 жыл бұрын
@Testostrone250 Yeah, i thought it was 7.6 secs aswell :s
@filomatic15 жыл бұрын
yep, I agree with druide106. these cars don't need more than 8 sec from 0-100 for sure...
@alamos83 жыл бұрын
That is vts 16 120, or 90? Seems 120 bhp version. 8.9 secs 0-100, seems quite slow, claimed 7.7... I think there are people that do it quicker, more similar to claimed figure, even measured with Draggy in not engine tuned cars
@saxoryan17 жыл бұрын
the first ever VTS' had the pepper pot style alloys
@deviljamez14 жыл бұрын
@Y0RKSHRE ah i see, i have driven them before and they do seem quicker, never timed it though, 0-60 is so good because of the longer ratio 2nd gear
@deviljamez14 жыл бұрын
@WillJPalmer haha hardly, as apposed to a ford puma or vauxhall tigra, or do oyu have one of them ^_^
@JoNnY070217 жыл бұрын
agreed!
@Stefano11145 жыл бұрын
Wow 11 years jajajaja
@cueball212217 жыл бұрын
Its actually a VTS mate look at the engine, it has VTR wheels on it though
@chapmasi15 жыл бұрын
I am to please :) Truth is I have nothing against any car when it comes out of the factory (even cheapo french stuff), but people seem to try and convince themselves that these cars are fast and are for racing etc.... Its the type of car your mum buys.....
@ladzm816 жыл бұрын
isnt that a VTR? has the VTR alloys no?
@BFASTRU15 жыл бұрын
I have saxo 1.6 VTS stock it runs 7.6-100 sec, my friend have the same car, and it runs also 7.6 +-0.1 sec. Measured by G-tech SS.
@lextube12 жыл бұрын
dich means 'you'
@filomatic16 жыл бұрын
it's VTS 16V, just look at the engine.
@dilawer32114 жыл бұрын
these 90's cars looked realy good, what the fuck did they do with the C2 it looks likes a fuckin post mans van
@kaaaaaaandries16 жыл бұрын
great car!
@akiskapouros16 жыл бұрын
saxo vts is quicker than crx on 400m about 2 cars ahead.this has to do with the better gearbox of the saxo.crx gears are to "long".we always talk about unmodified cars;)
@majorhan809 жыл бұрын
Será el 90 cv
@Knoppers198517 жыл бұрын
loving saxo specialy mine oder so ähnlich
@skylinedrag17 жыл бұрын
Are you sure??? honda CRX also has 1.6 NA, but CRX is lighter and faster than saxo VTS. D16a9 have 130hp or b16a with 160hp...
@skylinedrag16 жыл бұрын
I don't agree with you. CRX EE8 has shorter gears ratio: 1st-3.250,2nd-2.052,3rd-1.416 ...and final reduction 4.133 or 4.250 in EF specification. I think the B series naturally aspirated engines from HONDA are more "developmental" than 1.6 from saxo. BLANCHE RACING CRX B16 did 10.2ET with 280whp
@mindujiman10 жыл бұрын
just a great chassis, a car with 100hp less than the S3 being only a few tenths of a second slower
@alamos83 жыл бұрын
Well, I would be expecting even more difference that that, given the tight corners of that test. Big power is virtually useless in that kind of track
@n--r--s--7___9___66 жыл бұрын
😊😉
@deviljamez14 жыл бұрын
8.9 secs 0-60, my vtr mk2 will do it in 9.4 secs , not fast i know but not much difference between 8v and 16v :S
@chapmasi15 жыл бұрын
You clearly didnt grasp the sarcastic nature of my post
@jamie123b5 жыл бұрын
My dad just gave me his 2002 saxo vts
@DuDaX15 жыл бұрын
Then, does that mean that the UK is NOT part of Europe?
@cashw5514 жыл бұрын
If its fast, cheap and handles how can you complain.
@druide10614 жыл бұрын
faster than a trashmerican Corvette, enough said!
@Pebbles_CS15 жыл бұрын
nah you should just read the info.
@antonyr12314 жыл бұрын
@rumble291 vtr are still slower then vts no matter how u look at it lol since when was 8.9 seconds worth talking about
@rumble29114 жыл бұрын
@LIP15, Stop chatting shit. 170bhp in a 920kg car is overkill for most road users not only does it increase insurance prices and fuel prices by having forced induction but it also will increase the amount of fatalities caused by having too much power in a car that weighs practically nothing. There cheap, nippy and great handling cars full stop.
@ivanov89529 жыл бұрын
0-100 8.9 ????
@Skelet_Castro3 жыл бұрын
Yes why??
@BFASTRU15 жыл бұрын
+1 my stock 1.6 VTS `00 7.6/100 tested by G-Tec
@deep89n14 жыл бұрын
Dimonmmc true!!!:D
@chapmasi15 жыл бұрын
heheh well enough for this vid
@rumble29114 жыл бұрын
my mk2 vtr does 0-60 in 8.8 seconds with 3 people in the car....
@rpowell198614 жыл бұрын
this is a vtr not a vts. Look at the alloys
@JohnSmith-lb6ww3 жыл бұрын
Look at engine bay pal
@iibasse721110 жыл бұрын
@LIP15, tu ne sais pas de quoi tu parle...
@piramar Жыл бұрын
Moose test Peugeot 307
@druide10615 жыл бұрын
0-100 in 8,9sec???? what a bullshit, I never saw a Saxo/106 wich need over 8sec!! all cars were faster than 7,5-7,9sec stock!
@KOKO5Z16 жыл бұрын
corsa is car for tiny girls,
@chapmasi15 жыл бұрын
hahaha Its not that I dont like Saxo's I rem test driving a VTS when they first came out, and it was very nippy but all the chavs were lining up too so I walked I have just come hate their image, people chat on threads like this about 0-60 times and their handling etc... when its the type of car your mum buys! Everytime I see a VTR its always being driven erratically by some twat with a baseball cap on who thinks hes Schumacher because hes got 87bhp! the C2 has gone the same way to twatville
@thicky7ern17 жыл бұрын
bass riders
@djhillnigg15 жыл бұрын
mate you havent even got the slightest clue what your on about
@PeterLorre15 жыл бұрын
your german isn't too well eh????
@robz147116 жыл бұрын
lol
@194Easy11 жыл бұрын
Guys from motorvision ought to learn how to start correctly... /watch?v=6y1zebGeGXU
@jimbeamabarth1353 жыл бұрын
Mir juckt mein Saxo
@chapmasi15 жыл бұрын
Its OK in German I will translate for you: 0:29 This velour interior is typical of the French, its plasticy and crap! 0:37 This car was designed for 17's yr olds, dwarves and your mother. Real men cant fit behind the wheel even with the seat adjusted 1:06 When you thrash the nuts off it and change gear as if your Schumacher you'll still get beaten by a Mondeo 2:12 Buying this chav car means your required to permanently drive up someones arse as Demonstrated here 3:04 Dont bother, buy Audi