Scene from the film La Pianiste (2001) M. Haneke

[@shapolfab]

Amazing how isabelle manages to convey so much by doing so little, I think that is one of the key scenes, she's trying to keep all her feelings inside, whilst really she knows her barriers are collapsing! incredible performance.

[@AnXr]

Huppert is a supreme actress, I just love her

[@Yme7]

I love how Haneke kept the camera very far away from Isabelle in the beginning (anyone else would have given a close-up to her facial expressions when Walter came in), only getting closer and closer to her as the music transits from Schöneberg to Schubert, and as her psychological defense collapses.

[@clan_fraser19]

YES!

[@mirdja83]

Isabelle is like living painting. Absolutely enchanting.

[@reinoparalelo6245]

I really love this movie.

[@afterboring]

So, Op.33b Schoenberg; Prelude Op. 23 no. 5 Rachmaninoff; Schubert D959 Sonata movements 2nd and 3rd

[@egornashilov5449]

I just want to kiss your face.

[@ZafarIqbal-ex3oh]

afterboring dgj6r9lbv i

[@nicolasbouchard454]

thank you so much

[@robonick3607]

Thank you.

[@andaysa]

muchísimas gracias !!!

[@virginiadelbugio6580]

A truly wonderful film, with exquisite music and an actress like Huppert who is really brilliant ..!

[@sashas.5718]

Love this movie!

[@mathieuberenger7456]

Mon Dieu ... Quelle scène ! Sublimes tous les deux !

[@enzopaduano7441]

Un film indimenticabile che fa molto pensare....

[@PeepsILoveEllie]

Isabelle Huppert est très jolie, et elle joue très bien! bravo :)

[@sheryarahmed6331]

i love this film so much

[@angelo_150]

My favorite movie from Haneke.

[@virginiadelbugio6580]

The best Huppert!!!😍😍I love her!!!

[@dorothychuang7872]

WOW! What a performance with so little expressed! 👏👏👏👏👏

[@isabel8489]

It's Rachmaninov Prelude Op.23 No.5 one of my favorite:)

[@evaternal]

thank you

[@josemiguelgarcia122]

Her eyes

[@manuelcadillovasquez8154]

Esta escena es sencillamente brutal. Y qué decir de la Huppert? Pues que está fantástica, como siempre.

[@enzopaduano7441]

Una grande interpretazione di I.Huppert straordinariamente sexy nella sua doppia vita. Mi fa veramente impazzire!

[@mariso102459]

Oh and the first piece he plays I think is Schoenberg piano piece op 33b

[@mariso102459]

At 2:23 it's Schubert Piano Sonata in A major D 959

[@larabanzai]

ταινιαρα

[@The1976spirit]

0:56 is Rachmininoff, now in full scale: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g2m1qop8dpyDibs But hesitate, don´t provoke him with an ice hockey stick, when he´s walking in the park. Otherwise you´ll suffer the consquences: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pZbMZ4mIiLOnpZY

[@princepavlosofgreece]

I adore Benoit Magimel - as a actor and as a incredible beautiful men (especially in films from the beginning of this century: 'Fleur de mal' and 'Mademoiselle de honore' of Claude Chabrol and, yes, this film of Haneke very much too). I am so sorry, that he is not gay. Or maybe he is, who know? I think, he have some homosexual side, as a deep, but clear, cold and silent secret, which he never will live openly. Very sad indeed...

[@mateopeltier767]

this is such a weird thing to comment

[@narizota]

@@mateopeltier767 literally like wtf lmfaooo

[@11Garrett11]

I agree it would be a sad thing if it were true (as I believe it is true for MANY men because homosexuality is what we are shamed about the most), but if it’s not true and that’s not the case then it’s not sad at all & just your fantasy : )

[@GraceS-s3j]

Lol what are you on about 😂

[@Max-fb5bm]

@@GraceS-s3jHes on that Nut Pack 💦

[@dsbpmusic]

Rachmaninoff & Schubert -- it is an audition, and he started for the first in the list.

[@giuseppeverdi82]

I think it's Rachmaninov, Prelude Opus 23 No.5.

[@anibalopina]

Minute 2:00 it's Schubert. Min. 1:00 it's Rachmaninov

[@AKTPrinter]

Please, anyone can identify de music at 1:12???????

[@dsbpmusic]

Schoenberg 1874, Rachmaninoff 1873, Beethoven? 1770, Schubert 1797. chronological order?

[@mortalfrog0815]

@eraserheadjosefk no it's rachmaninov!

[@djmotise]

Wtf? Why did he go from Schoenberg directly into the Rachmaninoff like that??? Ridiculous edit. And none of you commentors noticed this?

[@gereonrath6601]

Dude it is just a cut. Everyone realizes it.

[@djmotise]

@@gereonrath6601 Says every mediocre editor and music consultant.

[@gereonrath6601]

@@djmotise You are a son of a bitch. Suck my cock.

[@EM-xj8hy]

Why are you so stupid?

[@jpeg204]

It is a jump cut to show the passage of time, how is that so confusing to you? The purpose of the scene is to show her reaction to his playing, not to be a spectacle of the music itself, thus it does a jump cut instead of showing the performance in its entirety because that would be unnecessary, the cut makes perfect sense

[@djmotise]

God awful scene. The ONLY reason the camera is on Hubert is to avoid showing the pianist who is not really playing what we hear. RIDICULOUS. And the director doesn't think we know this?

[@louisxav1091]

The actors really played piano on this film.

[@m.l.pianist2370]

The focus of this scene isn't the performance itself but its effect on Erika. We obviously wouldn't be able to see that effect if the camera focused on the pianist's hands the whole time.

[@gereonrath6601]

Fucking asshole, fuck you

[@isabel8489]

what an idiot.. important thing in this scene is her feeling and anxiety not piano technique

[@BuffaloBuffalo-uc6zp]

Well spotted. !