SCHD vs CGDV

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

FREE Discord: www.fundamentalsoffinance.com/discord

[@stevenjosephcomedy]

Well done! Love hearing about good ones that are less well known!

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Thank you!

[@passivedividendsoptions]

Does DGRO make more sense for younger investor with longer time horizons?

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Yes, as a part of a portfolio it can make sense. I'm not sure i would say it's any better or worse for that type of investor than the other 2 strategies in this video for that kind of investor. Most of the companies in these 2 ETFs are also growing their dividends (which is the kind of company dgro focuses on).

[@pecouncil2001]

COWZ vs DSTL

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Hey Paul! I wish I had time to cover these funds but they are too small to appeal to a broad audience. Shoot me an email if you want to talk about it more!

[@passivedividendsoptions]

Thoughts on DIVO?

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

I haven't done a deep dive on this one yet so I'll have to reserve judgement for now but I'll do a video on it 😁

[@nunyabidness1972]

Get em both! I use a combination of SCHD, FDVV, DGRO, and COWZ within the dividend/value section of my portfolio. There is some overlap here, but it's all still within the same sector of my overall portfolio balancing, so I'm OK with it.

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Yep, nothing wrong with spreading the risk around and I'm glad to hear you know those belong in a specific part of your portfolio. The claims I see online that this or that ETF is all you need to replace your job or to get rich on scare me! 😬

[@nunyabidness1972]

@@FundamentalsofFinance Especially if its a covered call ETF that will limit your long-term growth and instead pay a monthly dividend, or an aggressive growth fund that exposes you to substantial downside risk if a specific sector falls hard. While I do own both of these type investments, they have their place and purpose within my overall portfolio, but I wouldn't want all my money in any single one of them!

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Excellent! Love to hear it!

[@young_scisloving9789]

I notice that you dont talk about the Iraqi dinar anymore.... hmm i wonder why 😂

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

Because this is not a dinar channel, it's an investment channel. I saw a financial scam that was harming thousands of people and decided to try to do something about it. At this point, I've debunked every lie people are told to get them to "invest" and proven every major dinar guru to be a fraud. I'm not sure what more I can do. I still respond to dinar comments but my content is going to be focused on places where I think I can make the most positive impact on people's lives.

[@young_scisloving9789]

@@FundamentalsofFinance my oh my. You have such little knowledge my friend. You still call it a scam??? Wow!! Even with all the information coming out of Iraq in their articles explaning what is going to happen to their currency. Fascinating..... my oh my! How oblivious can you be?

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

That's the exact same thing people have been saying for 20 years. The gurus will always find new articles to spin into a large dose of hopium to keep you coming back keep people buying. It's all bs. Currencies cannot revalue up 3000x overnight. It will never happen in the history of humanity because it's impossible. SCAM.

[@young_scisloving9789]

@@FundamentalsofFinance who said anything about Gurus?? 😂😂 Gurus do not create the article which comes directly from the source itself. Your obession with guru's is ridiculous. If you clearly read the articles over the last few months which states the dinar will be stronger then the dollar then to you and I it should be common sense in what that means. It is stated In simple terms. It is not called an RV or revaluation, it is called an RI.... Reinstatement.

[@FundamentalsofFinance]

In order for a curency to be reinstated it has to be removed lol. What country do you think is going to invade Iraq? News articles from the source... same story people have been telling for 20 years. Don't let them trick you with that