SCIENCE MATTERS with Lawrence Krauss (EP06)

[@michaeltoulch4187]

Thank you Dr. Krauss - for keeping us enlightened and entertained in these crazy times. Awesome, as always.

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks

[@JerseyLynne]

Gag

[@MikkelGrumBovin]

vomit of the worst smartass garbage

[@JerseyLynne]

@@TheOriginsPodcast There is no god and I hate him. I just dropped in to say ELECTRIC UNIVERSE THEORY! Thunderbolts Project, Wal Thornhill, "The elegance of the Electric Universe Theory". I double dare you. Seriously, i see articles published regularly pointing out how scientists are confused by the results of their own experiments. Just how far will you go and how much of our money will you spend before you scientists admit that you really don't know what you are talking about, like dark matter, neutron stars, gravitational wave detectors (OMG), And your billions dollar atom smasher is akin to blowing up an A380 into a billions pieces to figure out how it flies. Interpreting new information based on what you think you already know is just going to get you further down the wrong path. It's just plain wrong. What if the red shift has been misinterpreted. The Big Bang Theory. "The hard swallow built into science is this business about the big bang… This is the notion that the universe, for no reason, sprang from nothing in a single instant… notice that this is the limit test for credulity. Whether you believe this or not, notice that it is not possible to conceive of something more unlikely. I defy anyone. It is in fact no different than saying, “and then God said, ‘Let there be light!’ What the philosophers of science are saying is “give us one free miracle and we will roll from that point forward, from the birth of time to the crack of doom.” And, you, you especially, who is one of those atheists whose only platform is to mock people of faith. To what end? How does that benefit anyone. You have ultimate faith in having no faith to the point that you feel the need to evangelise? Do you have any idea how silly that makes you look to me? Sorry, but I've been wantingto say that for a very long time. Methinks thou doth protest too much. criticalthinking.com.

[@michaeltoulch4187]

@@JerseyLynne I guess the Manhattan project for example would have been completed faster and cheaper with no need for scientists and calculations. You dont like math, right? Please let me know your thoughts on flat earth and homeopathy while you are at it.

[@jackylukewarm3257]

Dr Krauss' ability to explain science is extraordinary. his lectures are very clear, engaging and on point. It makes the content easily memorable. For ex: Antinutrino meets proton, changes it into Neutron while emitting Positron. Positron meets electron, annihilate and produce two gamma Rays that will be measured. The neutron produced earlier will wonder around the detector until it hits a proton to create a deuterium emitting a photon which can be measured. Amazing stuff!

[@MichaelReeser]

I love a good teacher. Thank you for processing this heavy information and making it digestable.

[@mr.j811]

Mr. Krauss, art, and now science, two great men that I'm proud to have been taught by, you teach just like him!!!!!

[@robertgoss4842]

I have admired Dr. Krauss for many years, but this is the first time I've seen his goatee. I must say it is cool as hell. Oh, and the video is pretty swell, too. Not all of us can be smart, but at least we do have Lawrence Krauss.

[@shaunmorgan4997]

Thank you, Prof. Krauss please keep going!

[@ShoeibShargo]

Big fan of your work Dr. Krauss. Glad that you have created your own channel now. And thanks for writing the book A Universe from Nothing. My religious ignorant friends lost their last few brain cells when I read it to them. Hope to meet you one day. Take love from Bangladesh.

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks.. take care

[@dipayansengupta5197]

I learn a lot from you , i am a CSE grad with a heart of a physicist :)

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

good luck in your own studies.

[@TrishCanyon8]

Love what you do Lawrence. Be well you and your family.

[@MrBILLSTANLEY]

We've missed you. So glad you are engaged and continuing to educate us.

[@Dr10Jeeps]

Thanks for another great podcast!

[@kiakia6617]

You are simply wonderful prof, just like the science you teach. Thank you. Thank you very much.

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

Thank you!

[@thomasdixonjr9940]

How ANYONE could prefer to listen to a flat earther conspiracor rather than THIS is beyond me!!

[@perhammarstrom4559]

It sure is for me to!

[@MrBILLSTANLEY]

Timothy Somerville can you offer evidence for your assertion about Epstein and Krauss?

[@pharoahakhenaten6630]

@Timothy Somerville www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/jeffrey-epstein-science-donations-apologies-statements I've posted this on over 100 videos of krauss

[@helloeveryone5251]

@@MrBILLSTANLEY easy to search, there's a photo of Krauss, Epstein and Steven Pinker.

[@insanisstultitia3119]

Thank you. Your videos are fresh air of intellectual stimuli.

[@eggsandwine]

All impressive measurements. Thank you mr Krauss for another great episode.

[@AliMohebali.]

I'm a new subscriber to the channel. This episode is great, I would love to see more of this informative episodes. Science news with a host that actually knows what's up. Thanks Lawrence.

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

Thanks.. I am excited about this too..

[@youtubeuser9972]

thank you so much. Lawrence Krauss is the guy every single human wishes was their teacher at some point in life.

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks

[@tomwalt3817]

Thanks dr Krauss for pod cast

[@kristapskarnitis9613]

Cant wait to watch the new episode! Thank you!

[@JerseyLynne]

gag

[@flyonbyya]

Need more of these Lawrence... Geez !

[@afborro]

I can listen to this guy aaaaall day long. Simply amazing. I hope it doesn't inflate his ego too much :)

[@derdagian1]

Alexander Borro Agreed... But, I had to fool him! Hahahaha It wasn’t EASY! Poor Hank was a Dark Energy Theorist! Oops Hahahaha

[@Pharaoh126]

I also thought i'd click in to see what this convicted rapist has to say in 2020

[@afborro]

@@derdagian1 Actually deep down I feel Lawrence is really humble. You know just sometimes the physics jokes that everything is physics, which ultimately it is, we could also say it''s all math . No need for that hierarchy :)

[@derdagian1]

Alexander Borro I know who was addicted to my brain and fed me Information. He isn’t a rapist. NEVER EVER BELIEVE A FEMINIST, EVER!!!!!! Only accusations matter to cops, lawyers and Judges. Those accusers MUST BE REQUIRED TO PASS A POLYGRAPH, PRIOR TO RUINING SOMEONE!!!!!! Never, EVER, Believe a Cop, Lawyer, Judge, or Feminist. The Judicial System has FAILED . End of story. Dr. Duane A. Gruber

[@derdagian1]

Ahura Sorry 😁😘

[@josericardopacheco3153]

Amazing, funny and eye opening content, great physics. Hope the episodes keep coming, thanks.

[@heathcliff8624]

Thank you Dr. Krauss

[@crash936]

Amazing episode, thank you.

[@tomsemo8186]

Excellent podcast. science explained in a understandable way. Good stuff.

[@BlackEpyon]

You heard it here folks. "Shit-ton" is now an official scientific unit.

[@WhyPhi]

Nice. one shit ton is equivalent to the amount heat released from detonating five Hiroshima bombs 365 days a year for 25 years straight.

[@teresawhite9628]

Have always loved you, Lawrence just found this podcast and immediately subbed

[@JerseyLynne]

gag,

[@abdulakeemyusuf405]

With corona pandemic! Science matters indeed! Love u prof

[@JerseyLynne]

Groupie

[@tilemacro]

@@john5012 OMG The same Prof who developed the epstein drive ? So Cool, Thx a lot, i didnt know !!!

[@keyboarddancers7751]

@@john5012 Think of all the people in the world whose great grandparents probably shook hands with Adolf Hitler!

[@AFROJOE2323]

You are awesome Lawrence- Thank you for this

[@dragonfly9786]

if I give you a small chunk of rock and say that it is a meteorite, how will you find out whether it is really a meteorite?

[@mj-jo8es]

My goodness! You are such a treat! :)

[@markkent2119]

hi lawrence, huge fan from dublin, thanks for the fantastic science matters series, top class!!!

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks!

[@constpegasus]

Thank you for these videos lawrence.

[@BiffTannenBTTF]

I had no idea this channel existed. I used to go to all your events at ASU and lost touch for a few years. It's good to be back and learning again!

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

Thanks.. welcome back. :)

[@Spectre3327]

I can't explain how grateful i am to people like You, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Sean Carroll, Carl Sagan and others scientists that take time out of their research to educate the public (basically for free nonetheless) about science, nature etc. I thoroughly enjoy listening to these videos. If i can make a suggestion for future, i would love to hear you talk about how we viewed the atom from a classical point of view and now from a quantum mechanics point of view, which if i understand correctly is somewhat different. Again thank you and stay safe!

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks.. writing about that.. someday will come out.

[@saltydodger9597]

Amazing, fascinating, keep it coming.

[@DownwiththeTowerexJW]

Great presentation Lawrence. When are you coming to LA?

[@scarlettardis2018]

Yeah you look good with the beard mate. Absolutely love these episodes. You must have loved hearing about the inner earth measurements!

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

yup. :)

[@AzimuthAviation]

An excellent episode and discussion. We got to enjoy a mix of astrophysics, geophysics, and particle physics!!! Your explanation of PSR J1141-6545 reminded me of your comment of evaluating the spin rate of neutron stars as gravitational wave observatories at the Science Salon event in Altadena Feb 2017. Now if we can get two more of these systems under study we can look for long period gravitational waves from Inflation. True to your advice I haven't hit any birds! :D Keep up the wonderful discussion!!!

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

thanks!

[@mirjam8724]

Thank you Lawrence. I really enjoyed this.

[@dragonfly9786]

if I give you a small chunk of rock and say that it is a meteorite, how will you find out whether it is really a meteorite?

[@TheManglerPolishDeathMetal]

I love your lectures

[@Petrov3434]

Thank you very much -- another great podcast

[@luckan20]

Thank you Mr. Krauss.

[@ThomasLBrock]

yeah man, great podcast! thnx for all that you do!

[@vadinhopsc]

Even following you and other great scientists for years, I wasn't aware of this amazing effect. Can hardly grasp how rotating mass can drag space around it. Just like Einstein's theory of spacetime being curved by mass, creating the gravitational effect. Fascinating! I wish the 4 thumbs down to explain their reasons (probably they are upset about the 6,000 years thing.... LOL).

[@JamesRichardWiley]

Fixed dogmatic belief vs a voyage of endless discovery. Keep the discoveries coming, Larry.

[@woody7652]

Thank you, Lawrence!

[@derdagian1]

Woody Lee Oswald Ving/Hank/Yours Truly. I know their Brains!!!!!! Hahahaha

[@tstadt9907]

My fave podcast and scientist!

[@scotkrewson1305]

Thanks for reminding me that there is intelligent life.

[@33393339yo]

I love this Doctor Krauss

[@MLSK8200]

Thank you professor Krauss

[@djcuriosity6670]

Holy shit where you been? The world ending science matters! Thanks again!

[@vk6uu]

The Australian astronomers sure had patience over 18 years. Would have liked to have been an astronomer - physicist. At the least we have people like Lawrence that inspire us. Will, Perth Australia.

[@vk6uu]

@Stevo Devo Hello Steve, do you also have a callsign.

[@billyjoejimbob75]

All this talk about neutrino emissions, now I wanna watch some Star Trek.

[@bokangleach]

Anyone know -- What/who is the "ghost" photo to Lawrence's right (on the left of the screen)? Thnx.

[@michellea9471]

LOVE UR KNOWLEDGE & LOVE UR SHIRT ❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@mcmacshalfilya]

LOVE YOUR GLASSES & THE GIRL BEHIND THE GLASSES♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@lsd25records]

soothing to my brain ...hearing science and intelligence.. the actual opposite of religion.

[@ritz5606]

As a layman I love to follow these sessions but intellectually I struggle with the understanding of space that bends and time that slows down. I just have to trust the science and be open for how science develops our knowledge.

[@flyonbyya]

Though I’m now thoroughly and indeed supremely stunned by my own ignorance to understand... I want and need more!

[@lukabc31]

12:42 "pulsar is 400 times the mass of Earth.. How can this be true? In that case it could not orbit the brown dworf, which is just 300 times our mass. Those two bodies would dance around each other but this is not what we are seeing. 14:05 is the curvature of space caused by the dwarf is correctly depicted? should not it be done the way it makes the pulsar orbit it?

[@jrhunter007]

Fascinating!

[@Clazers]

I love you, man! Cow dung and rocks; that's a cool story.

[@wowfmomf6126]

I would like to ask a question related the stages of a star's life and relativity. We know that times runs slower in regions where the gravitational potential is high, if we apply this to a star it means time at it's surface is slowed by a certain amount( let's say by factor of A) and later when this star turns into a neutron star the time on surface is slowed further(by factor of B) and and this happens in a certain number of years for an observer from earth(X of years). Now the question is since take X years of time for time speed to change from A to B then we have a circular reasoning where time changes in a given amount of time, how is that possible?

[@kilroy1964]

X will be different depending on where you are.

[@wowfmomf6126]

kilroy1964 that's right but it does not change the fact that it is still a change in time that requires a period of time.

[@kilroy1964]

@@wowfmomf6126 Yes, and that period of time is also relative.

[@wowfmomf6126]

kilroy1964 right now you understand me.

[@wowfmomf6126]

kilroy1964 change it's self requires time to happen and in this case time changes in time and the time it changes in is in it's self relative which means it also requires another time and so on ..... this is gonna be an infinite loop.

[@jacklcooper3216]

I have heard you say there is nothing to say we did not pop into existence minutes ago , with all our memories. You can not deny that the 6000 year old earth argument is just as valid as your model.

[@CaptainOnePocket]

What's that face in the picture frame behind LC?

[@hareecionelson5875]

Obviously the creationists will be saying "Bull shit" to which we can say, "No , we dissolved the bull shit in acid, this is silicon carbide"

[@PinkAmadeus]

If physics is beautiful, then astrophysics is ravishing.

[@terenzo50]

Well, after that, I could use a drink!

[@jries77]

@Stevo Devo hahaha!

[@glaucofernando9154]

Love your channel! But I am just a beginner in the world of science. Can you suggest books for beginners for a better understanding of it, please? Cheers

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

well.. you might try my books.

[@glaucofernando9154]

@@TheOriginsPodcast Ok. Which one do you recommend? For a beginner... hehehe

[@ShoeibShargo]

@@glaucofernando9154 A Universe from Nothing

[@glaucofernando9154]

@@ShoeibShargo Thanks a lot! =D

[@wesb8159]

Suggestion: strive for a conversation with Anthony Garret Lisi. I think you two are opposite side of physics but the conversation would be phenomenal.

[@Iyad46gamer]

5:14 Mind = blown 🤯

[@experienceanimation217]

Mind blown

[@cashkaval]

How can a neutron star orbit a white dwarf, since it has a greater mass? Shouldn't be the other way around? Also, isn't the neutron star itself generating frame dragging which interferes with the one produced by the white dwarf?

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

they both orbit each other.. but it is the white dwarf that has been spun up, and that is therefore generating the significant frame dragging

[@baalsguestjar106]

Dr Krauss can I ask If our universe isnt a bubble inside the singularity, that sprouted from. Where is the information(dark energy) that is increasing all distance everywhere from the sub atomic scale to the universal scale(distance between our galaxy and that of the Great Attracter) Which is doing so at a rate that is more powerful than gravity coming from? In other words where is the air that keep making our balloon bigger come from? Especially when information cannot be created or destroyed. Thomas L Barsch

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

I think we really should stop calling it "greenhouse" effect, since a greenhouse works by preventing convection, not by trapping radiation. So it's not actually a "greenhouse" effect.

[@perhammarstrom4559]

Hmmm.... Greenhouse lets all spectrum of light in and keep warmth (kinetic energy) trapped in. Quite similar to CO2 which trapps infrared energy in instead.

[@xspotbox4400]

Frame dragging is interesting, those jets show how space is bend between large, static mass and streams of heavy, accelerated particles. Wonder if this tinny knots could be used to propel space ships somehow, sounds like new kind of rocket engine.

[@derdagian1]

We are going to have to party so BIG! I’m Duane Gruber. I Love every dang one of you people! I was addicted to all of your brains!!!!

[@IBtraveling]

I'm drunk but can we clone Lawrence yet? F'n love that guy. He's always dropping deep knowledge about unimaginable truths of our universe and our fundamental existence. Keep rocking in the real world Lawrence.

[@pedropedroztravels8272]

Is he saying we can now use these antineutrino measurements some how to find out what's inside our surrounding planets/moons and beyond?

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

no.. just our earth.

[@Robbie_jojo]

Joe,I can quit weed whenever I want ,rogan

[@missFrill]

so what was you were doing on Little St. James?

[@quinndiesel1977]

How does a system develop where the white dwarf forms prior to the neutron star? Typically white dwarves form from stars that are 8 solar masses. I thought that understood that more massive stars move through their lives quicker than less massive ones.

[@Kaydin66]

what is the pale face picture frame to his right does anyone know why he has that creepy picture ?

[@ritz5606]

It's a derivation of a painting and also a print from the artist Edvard Much called "The scream". www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/jan/16/the-scream-edvard-munch-ultimate-image-political-age-british-museum

[@Kaydin66]

to HIS right. everyone knows that painting. i'm talking about the PICTURE.

[@Kaydin66]

you're the fifth person to misread this question

[@brallybear620]

Did I hear a distant popping sound? Yeah, I think it is creationists brains exploding, or at least organs situated where the brains should have been.

[@buzzhunta]

Marvelling at a rock when cow dung is best for soil structure from an animal that turns grass into milk all from the same Big Bang

[@reebeemack7379]

anyone ~ what does his shirt say

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

its from Cat in the Hat: Teacher of all things. :)

[@davidkubisa1647]

Krauss your just so krauss.....Can you wear the full wizard garb with the staff for your next video and wave your arms around a bit whilst presenting.....please!

[@Trisontraileryt1738]

But if silicon carbide is made up of carbon and silicon, how can you therefore find helium and neon atoms in it?

[@paxanimi3896]

Momodou Sowe . Contamination, it’s hard to find something completely pure.

[@Kaydin66]

on the left side of the video. wtf is that picture of a bald guy... anyone actually know the answer?

[@ecocentrichomestead6783]

Here's a science question for you. The age of the universe is calculated to be 13.8 billion years. The size of the observable universe is 93 billion light years. We would be at the center of that 93 billion light years, of course. Which means we can see 46.5 billion light years. For us to be able to see a star 46.5 billion light years away, that star would have to been out there 46.5 billion years ago. So how do you explain the discrepancy between the calculated age and the observed age? (32.7 billion years)

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

the universe has been expanding.

[@ecocentrichomestead6783]

@@TheOriginsPodcast that doesn't answer the question

[@rhondah1587]

@@ecocentrichomestead6783 Of course it does answer your question. The stars at 46.5 billion light years away aren't 46.5 billion years old, they have moved away from us so that they are now observed at that distance. The fartherest stars/galaxies are moving faster away from us that those closer to us. You just don't grasp the magnitude of the speed variences nor the expansion rate of the universe.

[@ecocentrichomestead6783]

@@rhondah1587 Do you know what a "light year" is? It's the distance that light travels in one year. Therefor, the light that we receive from something 46.5 billion light years away has been travelling for 46.5 billion years!

[@rhondah1587]

@@ecocentrichomestead6783 You still don't get the math do you sweetie? LOL

[@justanumbaofnosignifigsnce7971]

Upvote!! Don’t forget to Smash that, ‘Like, button :)

[@mlconlanmeister]

Of all cosmologists, Lawrence Krauss is most vocal in his appreciation of experimentalists.

[@bobbybax2360]

How many atom bombs of heat did it take to melt the mile thick ice sheet covering Canada 25,000 years ago?

[@huskypup3489]

Why would anyone think that if we generated all of humanity’s energy from wind and solar that the climate would not be affected in some way?

[@waltermeerschaert]

The real questions is ... Did they cite your paper?

[@nickvlops6663]

So when are you and Eric Weinstein going to have a cordial sit down and chit chat?

[@jojojorisjhjosef]

Sounds like neutrinos are a more interesting medium to probe the universe then gravitational waves.

[@shervinasgari6314]

Did I hear a nobel prize might come your way?

[@paxanimi3896]

Lawrence Krauss: if space is curved, as once again is shown, then gravity is not a force, right ? Quantum fields theory predicts the graviton, but how can it exists if gravity is not a force. How can gravity be quantized ?

[@TheOriginsPodcast]

gravity is a force.. just as electromagnetism.. but both are conveyed by particles.. if you want to think about it this way, gravitons are quantized bits of spacetime.

[@paxanimi3896]

The Origins Podcast. Ok. So many interpretations of GR saying gravity is not a force. So, it seems GR and QM can coexist explaining gravity. Tks

[@user-mt4vo4ey5n]

Why has not Krauss had Peebles on. They're buds, so what's up?

[@mastermind782]

عالی بود 👍