Magnets at the LIMITS of Scientific Knowledge

In this video, we explore the fascinating world of magnets and uncover a new type of magnet that we didn't even know existed. Join us as we delve into the latest discoveries and the science behind this mysterious magnet. From the ancient Greeks' fascination with lodestones to the recent breakthroughs in quantum mechanics, magnets have always captivated our curiosity. Discover how our understanding of magnetism has evolved over time and how it plays a crucial role in modern technology. We'll dive into the intriguing concept of electron exchange interactions and their role in creating magnetism. Explore the fascinating world of triangular agreements between electrons and the complexities they bring. Uncover the secrets behind moire patterns and how they can be used to create entirely new materials with unique properties. As we venture deeper into the realm of two-dimensional materials, we discover the endless possibilities and exciting developments that lie ahead. Witness the revolution in material science and the exploration of exotic 2D materials.
📚 References
www.nature.com...
newatlas.com/p...
🌐 Follow us on social media for daily science news and updates:
Twitter: / broadwayphysics
🔬 Check out my research here:
Google Scholar: scholar.google...

[@ScienceDiscussed]

If you are interested in this work and are thinking of studying physics you can always check out Atac's group at ETH Zurich. An excellent Uni and a great scientist. quantumphotonics.ethz.ch/

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

The editing in your video is terrible. It looks like some ten year old's creation attempting to show off every trick in the book all at once. It greatly reduces the quality of your video. Also, particles and agreements? Discuss science, please.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

MAGNETISM: See item #2 below: THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 1/24/2024: TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. TOE Idea: Longer version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Quarks, protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between quarks and electrons. In the case of the alpha particle (Helium nucleus), the electro-magnetic field interactions between the quarks themselves are what keeps them together in that specific structural format. 10. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. (The neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) 11. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 12. At this time, I personally believe that what is called 'gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is the force which allows a photon to travel across the vast universe without that swirling photon being flung apart or ripped apart by other photons and/or matter interactions. Gravity being a part of the 'em' photon could also possibly be how numbers exist in this existence for math to do what math does in this existence (the internal oscillations of the 3 different parts of the 'gem' photon, each modality having a maximum in one direction, a neutral, and a maximum in the other direction.) 13. I also believe that the 'gem' photon is the energy unit in this universe that makes up everything else in this universe, including space and time. ('Space' being energy itself, the 'gem' photon, 'Time' being the flow of energy, 'Space Time' being energy and it's flow). 14. When these vibrating 'gem' photons interact with other vibrating 'gem' photons, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 15. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 16. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 17. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 18. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 19. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 20. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 21. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 22. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 24. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. 25. 'God' does not actually exist except for as a concept alone. The singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. The CMBR from the supposed 'bang' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us. Red Shift observations have a more 'normal' already known physics explanation, no dark energy nor dark matter needed. The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning and will most probably never have an end. Galaxies collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating new galaxies. Galaxies and 'life' just come and go in this eternally existent existence. DISCLAIMER: 26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. Currently, my gravity test has to be accomplished to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea. But, if not this way, then what exactly is the TOE of this existence?

[@michaelfercik3691]

The physics of the magnetism involved in dowsing with the modern light weight ball bearing dowsing have been reverse engineered in the book: The Art of Dowsing - Separating Science from Superstition ($14.95). by Michael Fercik. All element's atoms emit a unique electromagnetic microwave band frequency with no two elements having the same. The same element's electromagnetic microwave band frequency that is contained in an elemental mass band together to produce the unique elemental magnetic flux lines with no two elements having the same. The modern light weight ball bearing dowsing rod is the only dowsing rod in the world that precisely gauges the dowsing of all edges, exact center, depth buried with angle of deposition, and most important is grading. This is accomplished by pitting the energy of gravity against the energizing of the one-tenth ounce dowsing rod load that is taped onto the 16 inch long acetylene welding rod, with being located 5 inches from the hub's shaft. The tip of the acetylene welding rod is raised five & a half inches based off the level of the dowsing rod's top rim. There is much more physics involved than this post can state. Become a professional dowser by practicing the book's dowsing lessons taught. Watch for our KZbin channel starting March 2024 ----- Tracy and Michael's Dowsing Adventure.

[@LordofSyn]

Thank you for providing references and a peer reviewed paper. O7

[@JeffyJeff01]

My reply is not a joke please look at it. Sorry it's kinda long but it's worth it.

[@ittooklongtomakethis]

Love the content but the editing is becoming a bit too much for me

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Thanks for the feedback. I was trying something different to see how it worked.

[@ExistenceUniversity]

Oh poor you, your free content isn't your way.

[@mubz137]

I agree that editing should be lessened to make it more tasteful

[@armadasinterceptor2955]

😂😂😂

[@project-unifiedfreepeoples]

This is typical behavior, when the mind can not focus upon the material, it becomes bored and searches for great understood stimuli. Obviously, the more exciting behavior here, was to troll for negative attention. Must have strayed away from the fart noises and cat videos again.

[@fishdude666ify]

Wait, wait; are you going to say magnets DON'T stop working if they get wet??!!

[@richardaversa7128]

1:29 Condensed Metaphysics, finally. I need my philosophy in small amounts.

[@limitlessenergy369]

Metaphysics. Yes. Not science.

[@stevenverrall4527]

That wasn't the only weird typo in this video!

[@ivocanevo]

Hahaha. Three guesses why I'm in the comments, two don't count

[@DarkMetaOFFICIAL]

fun, little known fact: electricity and magnetism are 2 names for the exact same phenomena

[@jsullivan1082]

The writing of Edward Leedskanlin of coral castle fame described the motion of particles he called magnets. Not being traditionally trained in physics he had a different understanding of things. I remember reading it and being totally vexed. Yet here this work dovetails his description.

[@michaelshultz2540]

I also thought of that. I use to live only 10 blocks away from the coral castle in Leasure City when i was in high school in the 70s and I remember learning how he used electro magnetic properties in his equipment and it totally fascinated me.

[@Jonathan-b2j7s]

Thanx Ed...

[@mastersoftheelectricuniverse]

I didn't really understand or fully appreciate Ed's description when I first read his book about magnetism, but I was always fascinated by it along with what he was able to achieve in our earthly realm. A few years back I gained a new found appreciation for the Electromagnetic Force, and a lot of the mysteries suddenly made a lot more sense. Sadly, they've bastardized "the "science*"..."* to severely downplay, if not outright ignore, The Electromagnetic Force's role throughout ALL of Nature. So now most of us are entirely clueless.., about the very same Force that literally Powers ALL of our electronic devices, many of which are designed to distract further from the Truth. Ed left us with a Legacy, that was hard to deny, but inspired many to wonder in awe, no matter how hard they tried to distract us. One day, I started reading a book about Electricity, trying to learn more about the trade, beyond just running simple circuits. Before I could even get through the first few pages.., something fascinating left me in a state of wonder. Instead of reading about wires, gauges, and what-not, the opening paragraph was describing Electricity's role in Nature. Along with this came a very simple description of what Electricity technically is: A flow of charged particles. Flash forward a few years, several thoughts later, there was a necessity to learn a lot more about the Physics behind The Electromagnetic Force. Eventually leading me to great minds like Faraday and Maxwell, and the spectacular contributions they've made, to allow us the luxuries of a world plagued by all these electronic devices. Despite the never-ending distractions, we have a wealth of information at our fingertips, waiting to be tapped into, to further both the individual and the collective, far faster than ever before. Did you know, a current of electricity will generate a magnetic field? Or that flux in a magnetic field will induce an electric current? What is Electricity then, if not for Magnetism? Yet, what is a magnetic.., if not for Electricity? The Realms are not blurred, but rather based. The relationship demonstrated by the Right Hand Rule (and Left Hand Rule too) exhibit the appropriate perpendiculars that account for the polarity of all three dimensions of observable space. Thus, explaining the Reality in which we all live, but many will choose to obliviously ignore. When you understand there are Reasons behind what Ed was capable of achieving, the man not only had a great way of attempting to explain the True Nature of Reality, but also did so in a manner in which it made it rather difficult for this world to simply ignore. Glad to see his Legacy still lives on

[@mastersoftheelectricuniverse]

@@michaelshultz2540 The dipole effect. Wal Thornhill explained gravity as a by-product of the MUCH more Powerful Electromagnetic Force. It makes a lot of sense, especially considering the fact that the dipole effect can be exhibited experimentally using a parallel plate capacitor. This is what we have with our Earth. The surface of our Earth acts as one "plate", but exists as a three dimensional object, encompassing the whole of the sphere. The second "plate" can be thought of as the ionosphere, applying a relatively steady positive charge from high up above, which maintains a voltage potential between up there and the whole of our sphere. Fluctuations in the relative charge being Applied to the whole of the sphere will thus result in variables observed within the "force*" of "gravity". Just imagine what one person could do, if only... Not sure if Ed knew, but difficult to deny what he was able to do ;)

[@Patriot_Priapism]

@@mastersoftheelectricuniverse how come planets without atmosphere still have gravity?

[@GeoffryGifari]

If the new magnet are made by stacking two 2D material sheets on an angle, what happens if stack another layer with the same angle compared to the top one? Will there be anything new in a "helix" like this?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Multiple stacks of different twist angles can lead to completely different physics. So we don't know what would happen for this material. I am sure we will know this in the next couple of years though.

[@christopherleubner6633]

Magic angle graphene sheets will do this because of 3 resonance pairs of electrons exist in each unit cell. If you have them at an angle the energy will flow easier in one direction than the other. Also the material is superconducting in the plane of the atomic lattice. When you have two sheets at an angle you get an effect called tunneling that completes the circuit making the material magnetic.

[@lvuyk2408]

Monopole .magnetism will solve magnetic spaceflight. See Q.FFF THEORY.

[@GeoffryGifari]

@@lvuyk2408 Hail!

[@gitmoholliday5764]

So infact it is a permanent magnet, that can be switched off and on, using electricity or a particle as a "domino" switch, depending on how the dominoes are placed, and where in this pattern electricity is added, they can flip in a one by one sequence, or more dominoes at the same time ?

[@GeoffryGifari]

I noticed at 1:27 it says "Condensed Metaphysics" but shouldn't it be "Condensed Matter Physics"? Knowing the theme of the channel and what kind of audience watching I think this could raise confusion.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yeah there is a mistake there in the captions. Sorry for that.

[@davidarvingumazon5024]

@@ScienceDiscussed Sue the Captions. 🔪

[@phineascromwell]

Metaphysics!!! Be careful: you'll make the Materialists of Scientism pee their pants!

[@GeoffryGifari]

@@phineascromwell Whoa i wet my pants already

[@limitlessenergy369]

No mistake to many of us. Quantum anything is nonsense that has never been proven in applied physical experiments, including the double slit. “Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” -Nikola Tesla

[@normanhechavarria152]

The truth is a lot of people don't understand how limited our actual knowledge is. We don't understand water very well. We don't understand light very well. Closest thing to actual magic that we have today is quantum mechanics. In the experts who study this say If you think you understand quantum mechanics that you really don't. Much of it is beyond our ability to understand at the moment. Magnetism is still largely a mystery to us. We can observe it observe its impact but not understand what it actually is. We figured out ways to use it does not mean we understand it.

[@garyradtke3252]

Thank you! We have way too many speculations and hypothesis being pushed as fact in science (and elsewhere) these days. Determining something as fact because they can't find any evidence against their hypothesis.

[@ezbody]

Most people don't understand most of the "limited" knowledge we do possess; achieving that understanding should be their goal.

[@GeoffryGifari]

Oh, and the last two: 1. If the magnetism is "kinetic", does that mean magnetic domains (like in ferromagnets) don't form in this one? 2. Is it associated with some critical parameter (like a Curie temperature)?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

1. It does demonstrate ferromagnetism so it will be possible to see domains in this material. It is hard to say where and when we will see these domains yet. 2. Absolutely, it will have a Curie temperature that is likely not that high above absolute zero (maybe T = 5 - 20K) but we don't know this temperature at the moment.

[@raygiordano1045]

Hi, just thank you for the video, I liked it, and subscribed. RE: 2, at such low temperatures, I'd think there wouldn't be that many electrons in an excited state, am I wrong about that? Is it the electrical current that causes the electrons to go into an excited state? @@ScienceDiscussed​

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yes at low temperatures the electrons settle down into the ground state. The electrical current is required to introduce more electrons into the system to make the effect possible. @@raygiordano1045

[@gonegahgah]

A similar thing happens for different materials in that some are inclined towards magnetic crystallisation and others are inclined to magnetic rebalancing or even opposition. All of this, as you mentioned for yours, is to do with the parts wanting to try to be in the lowest energy state that they can be. So it is not just a matter of angular momentum but also to do with balancing and that is no matter which version of magnetism that you look at. The problem is that we don't recognise that this occurs for gravity as well. Actually, I contend that it is all because of gravity. Due to the confinement of gravitational energy it wants to reach the lowest energy state. For many materials, which within are moving very rapidly within a very confined space, this means that almost all of the gravitation effect cancels out. This occurs because the gravitational components turn their gravity against each other causing cancellation. With gravity supposedly being a towards attraction how can this be so? What we fail to understand is that 3D gives us clockwise and anticlockwise and these are all we need to create opposite effects. We don't need charge. Charge isn't a particle but is just a result. So, for some materials a certain amount of alignment occurs, due to facets similar to those that you mentioned. So it is good to hear you mention them. This redirection of gravity, from simply spreading out evenly to being aligned along a direction, just as magnetism does, gives us the magnetic formulation and its different pattern of reduction to gravitation. If you could direct the gravitational effect through two poles it would decrease at the same rate as magnetism does. And that is exactly what happens. Magnetism is just a result of aligned gravity. Charge is a result of clockwise versus anticlockwise moment. So one end of a conventional magnet is the result primarily of the clockwise angular momentum at the north end, and the other end is primarily the result of anti-clockwise 'face' presented towards the south end. So the same angular moment is giving us the north and the south end simultaneously. This is why they can't find monopoles because angular moment has both clockwise and anti-clockwise 'faces' which are by the virtues of 3D space intrinsically tied together. You cannot separate them. If we can bring ourselves to see that there is only one force, gravitation, then we may possibly be able to finally come to an all encompassing overarching theory of everything. Gravity may look like the weakest force but it is just a neat disguise. That's why I'm so keen on the idea of frame dragging simply because it is the only thing that recognises gravitation whorls. It is wrong for us to not even consider what effect this has inside our atoms and pretend that it isn't even happening there as well. But, when you finally recognise that 3D gives us the two opposites, clockwise moments, and anti-clockwise moments, then you might actually be able to finally get closer to the truth. So thank you for your video. I like it when new developments show things that should make us stop, wonder, and reconsider our previous conclusions as to how things work. It should be an opportunity for reconsideration, not even more pointless differentiation and distinction. That would be just taking us further from realising the actual central principles that are the true reality of things.

[@MeLaang]

Your perspective on magnetism and gravity is quite intriguing and delves into some deep concepts in physics. Let's break down a few of these ideas: Lowest Energy State: In physics, systems indeed tend to move towards a state of lowest energy. This is a fundamental principle that applies to various phenomena, including magnetism and gravitation. Magnetism and Material Properties: Different materials respond to magnetic fields in different ways based on their atomic and molecular structures. This response can be related to the alignment of magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials, for example. Gravity and Magnetism: Your contention that magnetism is a result of aligned gravity is a novel idea. Conventional physics views magnetism and gravity as distinct forces. Gravity, as described by Einstein's theory of general relativity, is the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Magnetism, on the other hand, is explained by electromagnetic theory and is related to the movement of charges. Charge and Angular Momentum: You suggest that charge is a result of clockwise versus anticlockwise angular momentum. In standard physics, electric charge is a fundamental property of particles like electrons and protons, and it's separate from angular momentum. Angular momentum is a measure of the amount of rotation an object has, taking into account its mass, shape, and speed of rotation. Magnetic Monopoles and Angular Momentum: The search for magnetic monopoles-particles with only one magnetic pole (north or south)-has been a topic of interest in physics, but none have been observed to date. The relationship you draw between angular momentum and the impossibility of magnetic monopoles is an original concept and deviates from mainstream physics. Unified Theory: The quest for a unified theory that explains all fundamental forces, including gravity, is ongoing in theoretical physics. Your idea of gravity being the only fundamental force and others being manifestations of it is a bold hypothesis, and it would require extensive theoretical and experimental support to challenge the existing frameworks of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Frame Dragging and Atomic Interactions: Frame dragging, a prediction of general relativity where massive rotating objects 'drag' the spacetime around them, is a fascinating concept, but its effects are typically observed on astronomical scales. Its role within atomic-scale interactions isn't recognized in current physics models. Your ideas touch upon some fundamental questions in physics. However, they represent a significant departure from established theories. To gain acceptance in the scientific community, such hypotheses would need to be backed by rigorous mathematical formulation and experimental evidence. The pursuit of such novel ideas is essential for the advancement of science, though it's important to critically evaluate them against the body of existing scientific knowledge.

[@gonegahgah]

Hi @MeLaang , that is a very excellent, concise, and precise analysis. Thank you. Yes, the ideas do seem to be very novel from what I've seen myself. I read recently on the internet that they had considered electromagnetism as possibly being the basis of a theory of everything but had discounted it. I don't have any reference to that at hand sadly. But, nobody seems to have considered gravity. They seem to have discounted it because it is appears to us as the weakest force, or differentiated as the (novel idea back then) curvature of spacetime. Instead we have worked out the characteristics of the system and given each characteristic a particle of its own serving one and one purpose only. Like a car where the steering wheel turns the vehicle direction and the engine turns the wheels. So there you would have the steering wheel particle and the engine particle and the four wheel particles... The idea of these one particle per today's characteristics would certainly have been a novel idea back in Greek times, and they came up with the novel idea of atoms. A female scientist came up with the novel idea that the sun was primarily composed of Hydrogen. So there certainly have been novel ideas, and then just plane crazy ideas, like String Theory for example, and perhaps even mine? But, the emphasise in science today seems to be to distinguish things rather than look at how things are similar. Similarities must be explained away so that everything can be distinct. Doesn't really sound like a path to 'everything' to me. Right down to things like conduction, convection, and radiation, which I believe can all ultimately be brought back under one simple umbrella of photons within particular systems. But science likes to keep these things distinct. Science instead has particles like photons popping in an out of existence. So everything has to be couched in those terms. It's a random soup that can at any moment turn into something else where particles exist presumably by interaction, to just by sheer quantum randomness where we get the sudden appearance of mirror twin particles from a particle field that somehow co-exists with all other particle fields, all the way up to entire big bang universes being generated from nothing. All of this is based upon some direct and some indirect evidence. But it is all a characterisation. We can characterise things in different ways and that is exactly what we do. And, the aim of science today seems to embolden descriptions within those characterisations so that there is no contradictory text and all similarities that question that distinction are explained away. So in some respects it doesn't feel like we are really looking because we won't look beyond our present characterisations for any reason. So, certainly the idea of gravitation as a basis would need modelling and discovery to have any significance. But who's going to bother when it is outside the current firmly established characterisation of things. The gravity that we feel, is continuous, but it is weak, so that is all there is to it I'm guessing for many minds. I assume that they would contend that it can't be the basis of stronger forces when it is so weak compared to those. That is just the lore that would be difficult to surmount. No matter the physical suggestions for the process, why bother looking? But, who knows. Maybe it will spark some ideas one day... I certainly think that some of the ignorances I've pointed out of science are valid, as you have concurred, such as ignoring gravitational drag at the atomic level. I think that it would be useful to recognise that a particle can have multiple intrinsic properties rather than creating new distinct particles for everything that happens.

[@christopherjones7849]

gravity is the resistance to move akin to static and magnetic. Magnetic is high potential to transition stuck on a frame. Energy is just potential based on situations. Everything runs on a framework in a Markov like system. It's the speed of change not the speed of light in all equations. Idk just some things I think sometimes.

[@VonJay]

@@MeLaangso you just posted this into chat gpt?

[@leonhardtkristensen4093]

I am intrigued in all your thinking and analysing that you have done. I don't understand much of what you are saying but as I am myself a little like you thinking and analysing things I would like to ask you a question about some of what you say. It is in regards to Charge - electrical charge I presume. In my understanding the charge differential comes from imbalance in electrons meaning more or less electrons being present. Although I make myself an overview of everything I am trying to get specific knowledge of just some simple things like what is an electron. In my opinion it is an amount of energy that is most likely not a particle at all but more like a standing wave. We know it has energy. We know it can have more or less energy depending upon if it is free or where it is located in an atom. We also know that every time it moves inwards in an atom it gives out an energy burst that we call a photon. Now it has been found that photons can have different amounts of energy although it all comes down to Planks constant multiplied by the frequency (E = hf). meaning that the only difference between the different photons is the different frequencies. I believe that it has been commonly accepted that this formula E = hf is valid for all frequencies from zero Hz to infinity Hz meaning that the photon is really Electro Magnetic Emission (EME). Looking at the units I find that it is really the energy in one second. Now to get to understand it all better I have been thinking a lot about what I know about EME from my experience with electricity, electronics, radio and radar and from that trying to find out more about what I believe to be the fundamental of everything namely energy. I would there fore like to know what your thoughts are about EME or the photon or what you will name it. I am thinking about how it exists and how it moves in it's most fundamental way.

[@deborahduthie4519]

10-15 years ago, I couldn’t buy any size of magnet anywhere in Melbourne for about a year. I had to borrow magnets for experiments. Why would that be?

[@Patriot_Priapism]

Because of cina with an h to the right of the c

[@larryd6143]

The real breakthrough comes from self proclaimed genius, the man who knows all the best words, now says magnets don't work when wet. This has me baffled as my magnetic aquarium algae scraper seems to work under water just fine. What I really want to say is thank you for brining scientific knowledge to the masses. We need a better educational system pronto!

[@stevenverrall4527]

How is it that protons are magnetic? From where does their mass energy originate? Check out "Ground state quantum vortex proton model" published in Foundations of Physics on January 23, 2023.

[@TommyTippy598]

I can't admit to understanding this very well, but it was enticing and informative. Thank you for an excellent video!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@ccahill2322]

@irasmith3832, Just curious. How can this be "informative" if you" couldn't understand it"?

[@randallwhiteis]

@@ccahill2322 I'll have to rewatch it again to get the details, but the base of information, that is there is a new magnet type is, informative. See?

[@ccahill2322]

@@randallwhiteis, See what? Are you "ira smith"? Why are you trying to answer for another's question?

[@paulmitchell4421]

this interaction is designed to make everyone satisfied that they're incapable of understanding. it misdirects to enjoyment of mystery away from solution

[@certuv]

Most interesting , thank you.

[@davidcopson5800]

I was drawn to this video.

[@gemmafisher1584]

I agree magnetism is my most interesting study ive always been intrigued by elecromagnets! This got me into coils, crystals, math,superconductors, oposing magnets, fly wheels, ferral fluids, motors, conductors, and most importantly the effects of spinning metal fluids and magnets 🤔🤔 mental what one thing gets you into

[@martinhirsch94]

Now check out the plasma fountain and then the toroidial plasma. Are we having fun yet?

[@GeoffryGifari]

Hmm what about the behavior of magnetization compared to external magnetic field? how does the new magnet compare to ferromagnet, antiferromagnet, paramagnet, and diamagnet?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

It is a ferromagnet.

[@marcelma]

This is indeed an interesting story, but can you PLEASE skip those visuals, which do not contribute to what you are saying but are merely random associations with some word or half-sentence you are using. THERE IS NO REASON to illustrate the word "scientists" with a random stock pile clip of researching scientists and THERE IS NO REASON to illustrate a sentence about "discovery" with someone looking at probably some bacterial activity on a fancy see-through tablet, when you are actually talking about magnetism. And it does not add ANYTHING useful, if you have an Einstein-illustration jittering across the screen in Brownian jitter movements. But no! Next to every picture jitters!!! Are we on a visual nerve-tickling channel here? The only effect this has is that is muddies down the the associative acuity of your viewers. If you have nothing to show, but something to say, THEN SHOW NOTHING or show yourself talking and leave it to the creativity of the viewer to imagine somel illustrating image. Some of best KZbin science videos I have watched use few make-shift manual illustrations, BUT THOSE ARE SPOT ON!!! Man, this is so annoying that this video just barely escaped a thumbs down!

[@cosmoshfa88savant66]

Another great science site,,Subbed...

[@JoeGator23]

FYI, magnetism existed before the big bang and had an affect as it occurred. Magnetic fields and charges undoubtedly existed during compression, too. Sub-atomically every atom has magnetic fields. Magnets are one of the best toys ever gifted by God and this video proves it. The gift that keeps on giving.

[@rodinalmondbloom8562]

Thank you so much for this video...excellent presentation!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

You're very welcome!

[@brealistic3542]

Just a question here. If one can make three d magnet that constantly flips its polarities can one put a copper wire in the Center and get constant electricity ?🤔

[@limitlessenergy369]

This already exists naturally. I was at MIT when it was discovered. Im not tellin cause I am trying to buy it and dont need others buying it up 😝

[@charlesbrightman4237]

IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality? f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe? Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above. Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?). g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent? h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How? * ADDED NOTE: My current TOE idea can potentially answer all of these above items, and more, in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. And wouldn't one expect the true TOE of existence itself to be able to do that? What other TOE idea in known existence can currently do that? Surely not the General or Special Relativity Models nor even the Standard Model of Particle Physics. TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. I am open to any and all theory of everything ideas that can potentially answer all those above items in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. Currently, as far as I am currently aware of, there are no others but my own.

[@cadebritt8001]

Got my attention. Even for a nanosecond thought I understood. But I really would need a class to understand the application.

[@IragmanI]

Is the magnetic axis then perpendicular to the 2D material?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yes the magnetisation direction is out-of-plane.

[@IragmanI]

@@ScienceDiscussed...and are the moire pattern 'phase domains' (i guess) unipolar on each side of the plane, i.e A side is all N, B side all S, or do we have flux paths leaving and return on the same side with alternating NS domains? It's fascinating to think about the amplification and motivation applications and geometries of such a material, Magnetic Moire Bucky Balls?, phase shifting nanotubes?

[@casper191985]

@@IragmanIjo

[@ExistenceUniversity]

Fascinating video!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Glad you liked it.

[@Ballantin]

Very interesting and informative video. My only criticism is, please cut down on the flashy transitions, they rapidly become annoying and distracting. Thanks!

[@dp0004]

Energy, electrons, and us. How do we study an invisible force? I remain intrigued.

[@williamrbuchanan4153]

How will magnets function in a non or near no gravity region on Earth. Against a very strong gravity area. Thinking for safety of aircraft, and shipping.

[@ManyHeavens42]

Better to look at this like a reaction between two Universe's than two Magnets

[@Youtoobe0Guy0Awesome]

In KZbin I'd type "ken wheeler magnetism" if you want understand what actually is happening, but don't if you want to remain in fantasy of the mainstream interpretation of "quantum."

[@quietspecialist487]

I hope you get many more likes!

[@ezbody]

You mean there is a guru out there that knows everything?

[@MontyVideo969]

I presume aliens have got this slam dunked

[@MagicMike72]

Electromagnetic inertia is the key to magnetism. Energy is directional. The flow can be manipulated.

[@asmithgames5926]

They should try fractal dimensional materials.

[@Trihalo42]

Interesting. You mentioned Einstein and semiconductors in photovoltaics. Are they trying to create a "2 dimensional" lattice structure that will display similar properties to current semiconductors? You sure the "magnetism" isn't a shifting of the electrons like we see in photovoltaics, where the right frequencies jump an electron to a higher orbit and then it's just easier for it to move to a different part of the PN junction? Have they tried hitting it with resonant frequencies, as we learn in Chem 101 about spectrometry that electrons require a certain frequency, determined by some function of the Planck Length. Overall a very interesting development.

[@enjerth78]

Interesting. Sounds like it might relate to the twisted graphene magic angle producing superconductivity.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yes it is very similar

[@cybervigilante]

I knew it. I watched a cartoon years ago that had magnetic wood, and said to myself, "Self, they'll do that some day!" 🤪

[@mathedguy]

Interesting presentation !

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Glad you liked it

[@ManyHeavens42]

I guess it's coincidence we're working on the same thing,we always hag out in the dark part of science Town.

[@markhughes7927]

Wow! a 2D world in ‘condensed metaphysics!’🎉

[@sonarbangla8711]

Electricity represents weak interaction, while magnetism represents strong interaction.

[@gleambrite2679]

I always theorized this was possible. I no longer work or study in this field. I'm glad to see this achievement. I would be curious as to what relationships exist using low and high levels of frequency on 2D materials rather than than binding energy voltage. Very interesting subject. Another great mystery AI can help us solve.

[@absolute___zero]

frontiers of physics are always very interesting!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

It really is!

[@beornthebear.8220]

One thing that amazes me are magnets that are so powerful they are dangerous and can break bones. I know the Neodymium magnets in my bass speakers are fairly light, and offer the magnetic power that and old ALNICO magnet at 16 pounds was needed to achieve the same power.

[@charlesspringer4709]

That shepherd can't be very ancient if his shoe has ferrous metal.

[@samuelluria4744]

You're kidding, right?

[@charlesspringer4709]

@@samuelluria4744 What metal is it and when?

[@samuelluria4744]

@@charlesspringer4709 - With all due respect, as you appear to be my elder, and I'm old enough for that to still have weight to it...I think the most efficient query would be, what we mean when we say "ancient"? To my admittedly limited knowledge, a substantial portion of the Iron Age predates the earliest reminiscences of Greece. Certainly, there are records of ferrous metal being used as studs in footwear at least 500 years B.C. (excuse the _passée_ annotation). In my book, that's enough to be considered ancient. I am more than happy to hear your thoughts.

[@charlesspringer4709]

@@samuelluria4744 Reasonable. I was thinking the bronze age ended much more recently. I don't know why that had stuck in my head. One of those persistent misremembered "facts". Thanks for the reminder.

[@samuelluria4744]

@@charlesspringer4709 - 🫡 Anytime, Sir.

[@thedeadbatterydepot]

That's electromagnetic clothing, spiderman gloves able to climb metal structures

[@officialfanofrichiebricker8324]

Its just alchemy. You can already put metal in your clothing or magnets but stacking wool in a criss cross pattern will not make magnets and will not turn lead into gold

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

The video is all wrong. Magnetism is an increase in the power of gravity through polarised lanes that scale gravity down thus making holes for more gravity to move into. There was no Big Bang, and the electro-magnetic force is just gravity moving out of the way of itself. A bar magnet is similar to a vacuum cleaner, it moves stuff out of the way, and blows it out at the back allowing more stuff to move in at the front. There is no such thing as a pull force, or attraction. What you actually have are areas of high resistance moving towards areas of low resistance... always pushing, always moving out of the way. Also when they say 'no-one knows how this works'.. I know how this works.

[@billyyank2198]

The electrons reduce their kinetic motion by changing their magnetic state. It almost sounds as if these electrons emit a "magnetic photon", if you will.

[@robertpalma7946]

First seen your channel and loving it!

[@neonninja5049]

Magnetic fields are very interesting mixed with gravity

[@undernetjack]

Flashing lights! Aaaaaarrrgghhhh.... My Eyes!!1

[@Name_Lessness]

Chirality, or handedness, means that an object or molecule cannot be superimposed on its mirror image by any translations or rotations. Achiral (not chiral) objects are those objects that are identical to their mirror image. When it comes to explaining chemicals, atoms, molecules etc. Im always reminded of this word chiral. If were going to make exotic materials we'd have to make a machine in space that disposes gravity's effect. In order to move and superimpose materials we'd also have to find the frequency and vibration to fuse them together.

[@Ponk_80]

Could you make a video for people with weak hearts, so they don’t have to feel so shocked when hearing this news?

[@jimparsons6803]

Nifty. Using a ground state in a novel way. Interesting and thanks.

[@omegaz3393]

If we could fully understand magnetic energy, we could create a perpetual motor. One that would at least operate for 100's of years.

[@avenuex3731]

We understand that magnetism is related to the relationship of electrons. We have no idea whatsoever how magnetism works.

[@lepidoptera9337]

Magnets are a direct consequence of relativity. Somebody missed science class a lot. ;-)

[@bretts6861]

A big problem is that we’re trapped in these dated conventions, like positive or negative and polar or nonpolar, which are clearly either oversimplifications or flat out wrong. If I’m wrong, then why do we continually hear things like “partially positive” and “temporary” dipoles?

[@SciD1]

You still haven't told us how magnets work.

[@foundationrepairbear]

Ken Wheeler is the world's leading expert on magnetism

[@peterjameson321]

Thank you for an interesting scientific article. I'm afraid that I couldn't watch it all the way through because the constant video CGI and clicking sounds on the audio made it impossible for me to concentrate on the subject.

[@evacuatedspace69]

No, the big discovery about magnets is, when you dunk them in water they stop working! Lol.

[@michaelshultz2540]

Souns like it might be a step towards warp drive and the space time bubble needed to surround a craft traveling at hyper light speed.

[@faliennata5350]

maybe this could allow the invention of a magnet laser... Building a space elevator that is only a beam from a laser instead of a huge structure maybe much more plausible.

[@DavidCraig-go1zv]

Your video @ 1:12 is wrong. Put a piece of steel on each end. If your video was correct, one piece would fall off. Thermodynamics? We're looking at a magnetic field, not a steam engine.

[@sillybears4673]

So can this material cause other materials to become magnets or what’s the purpose or what’s the potential application these new magnets offer technology?

[@Squeezmo]

“Fully grasped” quantum mechanics? I thought that was impossible since it involves dimensions we don’t have (yet).

[@phineascromwell]

The proponents of Scientism conflate their Mathematics with Reality. If it works on paper, it must be real to them.

[@jonathanray4598]

People there never was a big bang!!! The very Title Creator demands a Creation. GOD has always existed, therefore Creation has too!

[@davidrandell2224]

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics: including magnets and indeed all of physics.

[@viveksinghchauhanbikingsin1425]

Magnets and elecic battery is described in indian book bhrigu sanhita written tens of thosands of years back...it seems knowledge gets transferred from one planet to other and one civilization to another

[@mikeleon5104]

The problem with this theory is 2D can't exist in 3D universe this is why we still have people believing that the world is flat. Science still hasn't figured out earth has liquid poles and solid poles along with the gas pole that they refer to as north an south.

[@stevenbeck5746]

Well that went way above my head.

[@limitlessenergy369]

Because its nonsense.

[@purplegravy1]

Sounds like simple old induction on a smaller scale sadly not very impressive and actually quite predictable also sounds like a resistance test and really this is probably something called the dielectric river wich is older than everyone who has seen this, its cool but not a surprise

[@TalkingGIJoe]

Magnets are the key to the universe...

[@rp1894]

Commenting at 3:05 here. RESONANCE. You need to apply principles of resonance to the rate of shift as the alignments flip. Figure out the speed that this flip churns through the 3 participating electrons. Each electron will take turns being the odd man out. Figure out how fast this changes and then we can do useful stuff with that information.

[@theSolarisDragon]

Just FYI David, we can hear your mouse clicking every so often.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Thanks for the feedback. I will try to fix that next time.

[@jeremyred6343]

Lol

[@jacobdanneskjold8472]

Well done 🎉

[@WinrichNaujoks]

Some very confusing typos in the captions. Metaphysics, matter physics...

[@michaeltucker376]

Sounds like you've explained What a Syllanoid is.

[@ivocanevo]

Tell me again about condensed metaphysics?

[@armadasinterceptor2955]

Love the editing, it helps keep my attention, visualize what your talking about, and understand the concept. More science channels should be interesting like yours.

[@jaymethodus3421]

This is definitely a bot reply and you should not take this into account.

[@walkabout16]

In the realm of mysteries, where secrets unfold, Magnets at the limits, a tale to be told. From ancient lodestones, the Greeks intrigued, To quantum breakthroughs, where knowledge is sieged. Triangular agreements, electrons in dance, A magnetic symphony, in the quantum expanse. Electron exchange, a cosmic play, Unraveling secrets, in the magnetic array. Moire patterns, like whispers in the night, Creating materials, with properties bright. In the realm of two dimensions, a fascinating tale, Limitless possibilities, where discoveries sail. Material science, in a revolution profound, Exotic 2D landscapes, where wonders abound. Magnets at the limits, a scientific quest, In the dance of particles, where knowledge is blessed. From lodestones' charm to quantum's embrace, Magnets' journey, in the scientific space. Triangular agreements, electrons entwine, A symphony of magnetism, in the cosmic design. Secrets of moire patterns, a mesmerizing art, Creating materials, where science imparts. At the limits of knowledge, where breakthroughs ignite, Magnets unveil wonders, in the scientific light.

[@brucemc1581]

But it's not really 2D right? Its more like a single layered material, no?

[@samuelluria4744]

Thank you!!!!! You saved me from having to say it!!! He said that at least twice, perhaps three times, and I just winced!😖😂

[@VonJay]

@@samuelluria4744yeah it was hard for me to watch because of this idea that 2D it’s an actual thing.

[@samuelluria4744]

@@VonJay - This is KZbin for ya, right?😜

[@ScientificZoom]

is magnetism only associated with iron or are there any for the other metals as well, now that i would call spectacular and marvelous discovery

[@ScienceDiscussed]

There are plenty of metals that are magnetic that contain no Fe. For example, Cr is also often a source of magnetism.

[@ScientificZoom]

@@ScienceDiscussed i know little of any other such magnet type metals, for curiosity i asked, thanks

[@reynoldsbeng3756]

The similarity with the ethmoid sinus is not a coincidence. Water, Experience and Electro Magnetism. Say hello to yourself

[@wesbaumguardner8829]

There is no such thing as a particle. The entire model is wrong from its basis. There are only fields. Fields are not particles. Everything we observe are macroscopic field interactions which are emergent properties of the fields themselves, and not "primary properties intrinsic to a thing."

[@Strife40k]

I think you may be onto something here

[@ezbody]

Yeah, why not.

[@Patalenski]

"The future of technology lies in the 2D world"?! WTF?!?

[@ChadKovac]

Did you slow out down? Sounds normal at 1.5x

[@AntonioGuidetti-ww8rb]

Where Is the link tò the new type of microscope ?

[@JeffyJeff01]

What remains hidden to us is for the most part hidden by what we think we know. What I mean by this is we have (what we call) physical laws that are in reality nothing but theories. The physical "laws" governing energy and motion tell us that over-unity is not possible when in fact over-unity is quite simple to achieve. As proof of how following this "law" has actually held us back by shutting down research before it can even happen I will tell you something about magnets that science has totally missed. A physical magnet is what is known as an Independent Magnetic Field which I will henceforth refer to as an IMF. Our physical laws tell us that to bring two IMF's to close proximity (either attracting or repelling) is at best a zero sum endeavor. This is so because the amount of energy needed to hold two IMF's at a set distance from each other is the amount of force generated by the interaction of the magnetic fields either attracting or repelling each other. That field interaction force is determined by the size and proximity of the two magnets interacting. The "law" governing conservation of energy however leaves out one simple fact. What if instead of lining up two IMF's and then bringing them closer together, we bisect the two fields at an angle when they are already close together? Well the answer is there is an approximately 2.5 x difference in the amount of energy the field interaction generates compared to the energy needed to align the fields. For example two IMF's sized to generate a repelling Field Interaction Force (FIF) of 10 lbs. at a distance of one inch will only require a force of 4 lbs. to align them by bisecting one field with the other at that preset distance of one inch. I have developed an over-unity drive based on this principle that I have released on here and also on Facebook. This is natural over-unity. It is actually fairly complex to think this through and quite nuanced as well. This concept and device are really difficult to wrap your head around because it goes against everything we think we know about generating energy. The reason this is so unique is we don not need to generate energy, it is a physical property of the magnets in the assembly. We only need expend enough energy to access the magnetic energy contained in the magnets. In this case the amount of energy needed to gain this access is a fraction of the amount of energy being accessed. Also as a unique property and characteristic of the magnets being used, time can be used as a mechanical advantage. What this means is the more we use the magnetic energy of the magnets the less energy is needed to gain this access. This is the equivalent of driving your car up an increasing incline where the steeper the hill gets the less fuel your engine needs to maintain speed up that hill. This device is called MEO which stands for Magnetically Enhanced Output and you can see a functional example on here or Facebook both accounts are under the user name "MEO Inventor" (use the caps as shown) or search "MEO part 1" and "MEO part 2" This is real free energy released as open source for the world. I have already received replies from several countries including China and the UAE. As I stated this is very hard to wrap your head around so be patient with yourself.

[@daviddavids2884]

information 7:30 after this video goes round-n-round and with less-than astute remarks, some time was required to filter out the fluff and generalizations. i am left with two thoughts: '2-d ' was not an accurate metaphor for this type of material; and, at some point, the FACT of and Why magnetism is 'linked' mainly to IRON should have been Discussed.! or did i miss it.

[@umop3plsdn]

"Fucking magnets, how do they work?"

[@thomassoliton1482]

This is a very interesting subject. If you find it very cofusing, however, you’re not alone. As much as I know about physics, this discusion makes very little sense. The examples are confusing, and the graphics actually make the “explanations” even more so as they are too dynamic and complex and don’t really focus on the actual “mechanism’ they try to portray.

[@kabivose]

As a side benefit, I've just learnt the American pronunciation of Moiré

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Haha I am Australian but I think Americans say it the same way.

[@kevinroberts781]

Anything can become magnetic. Some more than others. Just picture an item or atom with all the electrons flowing the same direction. Now extend that field out well beyond the item. Magnetism

[@robertbrown5536]

Thank you, you explain some things rather completely but other things could use a better example of what else it implies...

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Thanks for the feedback.

[@discoveringthegardenofeden7882]

"They can lose their kinetic...by becoming magnetic". Pleases explain this sentence and mechanism more clearly.

[@Texacate]

Reminds me of Batman's cape in The Dark Night. Add a small amount of current and the fabric becomes rigid (instead of magnetic).