Scott Aaronson: What is a Quantum Computer? | AI Podcast Clips

[@dannycaudle7850]

It amazes me how the world has brilliant people like these two walking among cavemen like me.

[@dannycaudle7850]

oven 100% right. God bless you.

[@onjofilms]

They're not that smart. They think a 1 and 0 at the same time will result in some answer.

[@xpkareem]

Ogga Booga? Ugh Zug Zug Moog Boog?

[@zanderperkalator9129]

And we can all watch it, rewind maybe 50 fucking times to understand everything, but you come out with an expansion of knowledge.... it’s dope af and I’m almost 40 guys, this shit don’t stop being cool!

[@aseri93]

@@onjofilms stop being silly

[@ephi124]

One thing I like about Lex is that he is unassuming and likes to get the best of his interviewees by giving them space and showing genuine interest.

[@Tech_Planet]

This podcast is one of the best explanations on quantum computing!

[@SuperMaDBrothers]

how would you know :|

[@willdarling1]

3:45 Double Slit explained for people with no sight !! (never found double-slit without diagrams before!)

[@StevenOBrien]

Think I'm gonna have to re-watch this one a few times before I get it!

[@lbuday]

Watch a video about the double slit experiment. If I didnt hear about that earlier I wouldnt have understood eather

[@DiegoMadrigali]

I understood 20% of what he just said, but I enjoyed it 100%.

[@KadirPeker]

First time a discussion on quantum computing is making sense to me, almost. I love it when a genius lays down the essential core idea of a very advanced field in all its simple beautiful purely logical essence.

[@miguelmyers9546]

Dose this guy have a book because the way he explains quantum mechanics is so simple

[@lexfridman]

His blog is great: www.scottaaronson.com/blog/ And yes, he has a book "Quantum Computing since Democritus": amzn.to/38GwreZ

[@chees720]

@@lexfridman my man! Thanks

[@zodsinclair8500]

@@lexfridman *Quantum Computers* ....we were looking for a PURPOSE for them, other than to play Minecraft quite efficiently! *CORONA VIRUS* *THIS IS IT!* - Give this 'Problem', [The genetic code of China shared the new virus, also know as *"2019-nCoV"* ] to a Quantum Computer, a problem that is taking lives FAST & is need of a solution in Days, not mths or yrs! Dr. Gershon, I saw a WIRED video where you say these comps can Simulate Chemical Bonding!...If thats the case then you can make it a task to Simulate the chemical bonding of CORONA VIRUS, have the quantum Computer break it down not just into atoms and molecular makeup but also the molar Equation. Then the Quantum Computer can work on Simulating the chemical structure and Bonding of CORONA VIRUS AKA *"2019-nCoV"* , and then you guys can Simulate adding chemical Additives that can deconstruct the virus, into harmless substances on the other side of the equation such as CORONA VIRUS + C6H2O? + Avacados = Ether + H2O .... or something, hopefully you get the drift of what I'm saying & gather with all the other great minds with access to Quantum computers. those at Google too, though they be your rivals for 'Quantum Supremacy' Surely you guys can have a Healthy alternative to the 'CURRENT WAR' Where instead of fighting to win host the Fair & win the race to Light the World at Night! Instead You guys can both FIGHT to save humanity from a disease of its own, with Quantum Computers a device that can solve problems in seconds or days that no other person or device could even in yrs or months! Please if you can get this across to the beautiful *Dr. Talia Gershon,* & or those at GOOGLE & Alphabet CEO *Sundar Pichai* pls see if you can get these brilliant people to tackle real world problems with there 'Super Computers' Such as *Corona Virus.*

[@raghavjagarwal5873]

@@zodsinclair8500 This really is a thought worth having. I guess scientists would have already thought about this..

[@zodsinclair8500]

@@raghavjagarwal5873 Yeah, I hope the do man, it finally reached Africa today & I'm hella worried because I doubt they have the infrastructure to manage it with speed, I hope I'm wrong for the worlds sake.

[@NA-lp2re]

Great explanation. This is the first explanation that helped me understand how quantum computation is possible in a real world sense.

[@dk_kardboard]

Me too!

[@HungNguyen-db6js]

Excellent video. The best explanation of Quantum Computing I have ever heard.

[@dk_kardboard]

I wholeheartedly agree with you. Cheers!

[@BuiltWithLLMs]

Thank you so much Lex for always exactly asking the clarifying questions. Great talk!

[@SS-qu9nn]

It’s mind blowing how smart some people are. Really brilliant guy. The way he explains quantum physics at beginning of the 12 min mark, is the best explanation I’ve seen to date. This nature of quantum, and the fundamental obstacle of quantum computing. That is why they are looking to get as close to absolute zero as possible. Fascinating video.

[@conclaveluminis]

Beautiful explanation. Concise and well framed. Thank you.

[@patrickjdarrow]

Scott is such a personable guy. I'm glad you're generalizing your channel content Lex, hope you continue to branch out with a focus on incredible people from diverse backgrounds

[@michaelcwkwong]

The explanation is clear and exciting. Thanks Lex!

[@kadenabet]

This lack of fundamental understanding is why I left QC after a brief foray into it after graduating. We know so little about how it works and are just lucky that this system can be partially described by complex numbers and therefore give us some scant operations to try and do some fun expiriments and play with this totally alien world of the minute. Aaronson is a good explainer, lol if a bit emphatic with the hands.

[@HadiM-rb7yo]

words can't express how much I needed this. thank you

[@MrsRapunzella]

Whenever I see a pic of a quantum computer I can't help thinking about Sia - Chandelier ;) All kidding aside, this is a great talk! One of the clearest introductions (if not THE clearest) to quantum computing I've ever heard. Bravo!

[@JakubNaszkowski]

Thanks for all of your videos Lex. I really appreciate what you are doing. It helped me to understand computer science A LOT. I am getting officially educated into this direction.

[@morphers21]

Finally, someone tells us that observation is not only done by humans, but by anything.

[@budstep7361]

Thank you, this is excellent background

[@Stfugb2s]

Breaking it down into more mechanical explanations is great for wrench turners

[@kentrader2489]

My CS Professor: You need to understand the hardware before we start C++ Scott: Man open up Python right now

[@bartjaworski239]

greatly underrated content

[@joshcoughx]

Oh man, looking forward to this!

[@seelouder3629]

That's a Philly accent. Great stuff!

[@ahmedsherief]

very cool, but can it run Crysis?

[@honestmicky]

Excellent video, thanks for posting, much appreciated. Love your channel : )

[@chrisofnottingham]

Most people understand "computer" to mean something like a PC or a laptop with an operating system etc, whereas in fact a quantum computer is essentially more like a peripheral ALU dedicated to certain types of calculation.

[@joleenskipper803]

I would love to see a video explaining Quantum Pathogens.

[@AndogaSpock]

If the goal is to store more than two possible pieces of information in a bit, why not do that today with classical memory, but based on the voltage level, it could be a 0 or 0.1 or 0.23 or 0.5 or 0.006 all the way upto 1 ?

[@rickharold7884]

Super awesome!!

[@DamianReloaded]

Wow. I know quantum computing now. Thanks! ^_^

[@MrHeHim]

My presumption is that qbits are the new transistors (switches) and if it took 10-20 years after the first properly working transistor to be used in computers to a function degree compounded by the ever increasing abstract in physics and math that will be needed to use the propertys of qbits my guess is either there will be someone that stumbles onto a functional and practical way to use qbits reliably or in about 20-40 years we brute force it and have immense computers/buildings to barely function as quantum computers. That's my guess/impression anyway

[@afnerdspace5368]

I would disagree. Back then innovation and progress was much slower in general. There tends to be an exponential improvement rate here. Drawing conclusions for today's projects from yesterday's timelines seems risky business to be.

[@NYGiantsDiEhArD]

6:00 to 10:00 probably is where it started to get confusing to me.

[@prescientdove]

Is the error correction sort of like a CD players error correction?

[@TheyFramedVader]

lex fridman is making me a smarter human

[@corybowen4426]

Wish I understood any of this

[@张含-s3t]

but is quantum computing the fundamental solution to np problem?

[@ProxCyde]

Screw the "conventional" quantum computing! Let's just manipulate an isolated area of spacetime where the computation takes place and have time run faster relative to where the measurement takes place. Get on it science! (I clearly have no idea what I'm saying)

[@JoshiaSeam]

Scott Aaronson did discuss something like this a while back with closed timelike curves ie. time travel. Given this possibility, this would make quantum and classical computing equivalent. There's another generalization for close timelike curves that allows you to solve the Halting Problem. I can't remember which paper is this. Here's the paper regarding closed timelike curves making classical computing and quantum computing equivalent. We still don't really know exactly where the quantum complexity classes reside with respect to other classes. Mainly whether BQP = P. If so you would find that a polynomial time quantum algorithm would be equivalent to a classical one. arxiv.org/abs/0808.2669

[@kagmaster8127]

Could blackholes house these qbits so they use energy from 4d space but the information outcome turns into a 3d object?

[@alexandria5758]

This guy reminds me of Toby Isaacs from Degrassi

[@prescientdove]

He reminds me so much of Ben Goertzel

[@jtegland]

Is there any way to create or anything to be gained by running a virtual quantum computer on a classical machine?

[@gushersrock]

I believe he said at 6:10 that trying to simulate the 2^1000 possible states of a quantum computer would not work, because the conventional computer able to hold that absurdly large amount of data would be larger than our observable universe. By exploiting the behavior of quantum superposition we are able harness this data because it is encoded in the traits of interaction of the fabric of reality, for example the behavior of spinning particles. Transistors do not work with the same fundamental and minute quantum characteristics. But that is said for a useful quantum computer with 1000 qubits, I’m sure that a 8 bit or so q computer could be simulated. As 2^8 states is not unreasonable to simulate on a conventional traditional computer, and this would let us perhaps study the interaction better. I wonder if a virtual simulated q computer would require the same error correcting qubits as well? Good question John

[@zunriya]

tom petersen / david canter please ❤

[@koshnaranek3062]

I felt stupid at like 36 seconds

[@Aman-ni4wl]

Please refrain from using 'single use' plastic bottles

[@JoryIsHere]

I feel like he could not have explained it any simpler, but yet I still don't understand it. I'll just add this to the mounting evidence that I might be fucking stupid.

[@onjofilms]

Eventually I think an algorithm will be designed that can simulate physical states. And then we won't need any kind of computer. Just the algorithm all by itself on the table.

[@roelrovira5148]

Scott and Lex,, there are two types of Quantum Computer in Nature characterized by its size in Quantum realm. One is at microscopic/subatomic scale. The other is at macroscopic cosmic scale. The first is the one that is overhype by Google as Quantum Supremacy of Quantum Computer. The later is the one that I have discovered/invented- the Gravitational Quantum Computing- The Ultimate Computer System that uses Rhu Bit or R Bit Codes that program and runs the entire Universe. One of the most difficult conundrums in Physics - THE TRUE NATURE OF QUANTUM GRAVITY, was solved by Gravitational Quantum Computing and Gravitational Quantum Entanglement - the Quantum Entanglement at macroscopic cosmic scale. We now have an empirical theory of Quantum Gravity- The unitary Trinity God Theory and Equations that are deeply hidden in plain sight and manifested by Quantum Gravitation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. Also, Quantum Gravity is the key to unification of Gravity ang Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Gravity and the theory, mathematics, laws, reproducible experiments and observations that underpinned it, is crucial for an empirical real true Quantum Theory of Gravity that would finish Einstein's Revolution in physics. Problem is that, since the 17th century up to the present, the Mathematics that we have so far cannot solve the problem of quantum gravitation. Mathematics is invented and discovered. That's my personal experience. I've invented/discovered a completely new mathematics in the course of my 30-year-long basic research on Quantum Gravity in Singapore. I called it Majulah Matematika in honour of my home country Singapore. I use it to solve one of the most difficult conundrums in physics- the True Nature of Gravity. In addition, I also have invented/discovered the elusive Magnetic Monopole and the Gravitational Computation Language and Codes that program and run the Quantum Gravitation and the Universe itself as the Ultimate Massive Cosmic Computer System covering the entire observable Universe. Here is one of the many solutions that we can derive from my new mathematics: A Computer Universe that is real. It is run by Quantum Gravitational Computation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitation covering the entire Universe. An empirical Theory of Quantum Gravity is the key. And it will led us to understanding of how and why Gravity works. It will also at the same time, debunk and invalidate String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, M Theory, Theory of General Relativity and all failed and wrong theories of gravity. But it will proved and validate Einstein's Hidden Variables and EPR's authors Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen correct. The Hidden variables are: Quantum Gravity, Quantum Anti-Gravity, Quantum Neutral Gravity, the macroscopic cosmic scale Gravitational Quantum Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. All these would complete the Quantum Foundation, Unification of Gravity with Quantum Mechanics and the realization of Theory of Everything in Physics. I have discovered and cracked the code of the true nature of Gravity in my over 30 years of basic research works in Singapore. This discovery/invention/theory of mine include THE GOD EQUATION - THE TRINITY Equations, Laws and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION , QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLE MENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION that pave the way for Theory of Everything in Physics: - THE 3-in-1 HOLY GRAILS of Physics: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/0 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α 2. Quantum Gravity/Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/1 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α 3. Quantum Neutral Gravity/Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/01 and/or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical Laws, Cosmic/Universal Computation and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole. Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the unitary Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics and two newly discovered Fundamental Forces of Nature - The Quantum Neutral Gravity and Quantum Anti-Gravity which completed the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows: 1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation: “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α Where: QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity. “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” -Roel Real Rovira Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α Where: QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. 3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation. “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.” - Roel real Rovira Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement: QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α Where: QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg. ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3. ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity. Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year. Copyright 2022 ROEL REAL ROVIRA. All Rights Reserved.

[@regard2093]

You should ask designing mechanical computer for use in extreme place like venus

[@driftthekaliyuga7502]

So, quantum computing is currently a physics and engineering problem?

[@malarkeyhippie3215]

The trick to she loves me, she loves me not.

[@janbam1778]

What is a Quantum Computer? Amplitudes!

[@kuzuboshii]

Scott Aaronson looks like the television version of himself.

[@rkalla]

😂

[@rlpii_]

Question: Who is working on making music with AI? Totally unrelated but i thought this crowd might know. :)

[@vg1403]

There is an Aussy guy

[@jaskbi]

Will have to watch the full Interview, but the question i would like to know is with a stable quantum computer, is it possible to run a simulation of say the real world.

[@museitup4741]

A stable quantum computer isn't sentient, you would still need to feed it the necessary data for it to "simulate" anything. That's a software problem more than anything as far as I can tell

[@Jonathan-Pilkington]

The problem with simulating "the real world" is that you can't simulate every grain of sand and every human mind. There is no way to input this information into the simulation to get it started int he first place.

[@driftthekaliyuga7502]

@@Jonathan-Pilkington Technically you don't have to and it doesn't need to be perfect. You could say you need a working "theory of everything" to put into the computer to start the simulation. That's only necessary to simulate our universe and make it imperceptible to us. The other way is to make the simulation sufficiently realistic that the inhabitants of the simulation don't know they're in a simulation.

[@chris_sndw]

Now I feel stupid.

[@lllllREDACTEDlllll]

He sounds like Bizzaro Bam Margera.

[@simbaonsteroids8836]

Plot twist: theoretical insights make costs explode

[@arunramji]

Isn't it comparatively easier to build computer which imitates human brain rather than quantum computer ( though power consumption and processing speed must be much higher ) ?

[@d2xr]

No

[@arunramji]

@@d2xr why ?

[@fabiosilva9637]

The gist of quantum computers is that it could theoretically compute all possible outcomes of a problem at the same time, hence why it would be faster than regular computers. It would take a really short time for a quantum computer to crack a password that would take 1 billion of years for a regular computer to crack, for example. So in the long run, quantum computers can be much more time efficient than a neuromorphic computer.

[@markoIam1]

Just a thought, Although dark matter is a force which pushes the cosmos apart it may also be what keeps the universe together. At the quantum level dark matter may be what keeps electrons and light from collapsing into the atoms nucleus causing thermal equilibrium aka the end. Same may go for black holes in the macro world. The question of why wave functions act as waves until observed then they act as particles may be explained if the following is considered: (If) Waveforms are in fact just particles; electrons, photons traveling at the speed of light or greater around the nucleus of an atom may seemingly behave as a wave because the velocity exceeds the forward motion of sub light speed time. In other words as Sean Carrol explained, if you travel around the event horizon of a black hole fast enough you can in fact travel behind and than past your own position and get ahead of yourself. (This looks a lot like superposition) Although time is linear it is possible to get to the future traveling faster than light, now if you are traveling in a circle ⭕️ you can get behind yourself or pass. This can explain the quantum state of superposition where the particles can be at all places at once until observed. The act of observing causes entanglement which slows the particle below super photonic speeds and the superposition of the wave function collapses into a finite position and can be observed as a particle. Dark matter may provide a buffer between the nucleus and particle assuming there is a quantum scale black whole at the center of each atoms nucleus. The dark matter buffer would act much like a supercooled superconductor which allows magnetic fields to be in quantum lock, allowing for the orbit of particles to be possible without collapsing or evaporation unless another force is introduced. This makes for a stable system of low entropy. I’m not that smart and this is a very rushed explanation but I feel like there’s something to my idea. Seems as if this is all engineered.

[@ChildOfTheLie96]

TRUMP2020

[@Tom-wm6lp]

You meant Dark Energy. But no this is just wrong. I am not going to answer whatever Sean Carrol said you are referencing. I have not looked up the exact numbers but there are orders of magnitude difference between the electronic repulsion and dark energy. Dark Energy accounts for most of the mass energy of the universe by current estimates. If you balanced those forces we would be flying apart from dark energy pushing on everything. Nothing would be. That is without even considering how this would work are the electrons still accelerating in the electric field around atoms? Then they should be radiating Synchrotron radiation. They do not. They act like probability distributions around atoms. However, you might enjoy reading up on Bohemian mechanics. This assumes they are particles but the particles are riding waves. I don't know how they deal with bound states as Bohemian mechanics is not an well accepted theory for quantum mechanics (more people believe many worlds is true than Bohemian mechanics and there are few.... researchers due to lack of belief and thus funding). Only "settled" science is taught so one does not know much beyond headlines without your own research into a field. In regards to being engineered. Although I am not a man of faith, however, advanced our science ever gets we will never be able to disprove being "engineered". To do so would be to know about everything that is outside of what we know a contradiction. There are always places for an engineer to hide. Were I a God though I would make fun things for my "children" to investigate and this universe does seemingly maximise stories.

[@Alejandro_87]

I just hope we don't get hit by the cosmic banhammer for trying to hack the universe

[@ManicMindTrick]

The simulation can't be hacked, it's set up that way.

[@CoolBreezyo]

So glad I won't be around for the AI quantum master race uprising! Party now humans, our days are numbered! Also - so theoretically, a qubit is a probability expression of any (or all? and/or all?) numbers between 0 & 1? Or is there a tuning tolerance? For instance, any/all numbers to x decimals between 0 or 1?

[@tuberhubris4154]

The Terminator's plot seems more real as time goes by.

[@nothingiseverperfect]

bro I am so dub I barely understood LOL

[@paaaaaaaaq]

Fun fact. QC doesnt work.

[@kwal559]

no chucklehead, nothing closes down.

[@AmDsus2Fmaj7Am]

@ 10:05 dude takes a piss on that 8:15 question, but you kind of asked for it. You should expect your audience to know that. Engage with your interviewee's brain or he'll give you shit.

[@ArizVern]

WOW

[@alphaomicron8]

Quantum mechanics doesn't say anything about the world that anyone can understand, the running joke is that even the experts are clueless. When you have a dead end theory that is still dominant and kicking around you get stuff like quantum mechanics trying to salvage the dead carcass by making it even more convoluted than it originally was, this way no one can understand it let alone challenge it. Nature does things super simple and quantum anything is not anywhere near that, remove particles, insert only wave, frequencies and vibrations and physics can make sense again. Dayton miller proved all this 120 years ago and yet was ignored but the Einstein mob, so maybe in another 120 years

[@kobiromano6115]

Is this what happens to Kyle Schwartz when he grows up...?

[@matthewcory4733]

Scott is not really right here. The environment is not the only problem because the Bloch sphere is continuous.

[@SeedsofJoy]

i watched this 4 times and still stand nothing lol. but im glad there are high IQ people who exist who do.

[@canyonroots]

Unprovable, unuseable

[@Jonathan-Pilkington]

Already working, already being used.

[@Redlioness-gp9ci]

Now you know why they rolled out the Internet. Data gathering device that is constantly fed into one big hive mind. Computer algorithms are hungry for input. AI 's. Will be deployed so humans can chill out or maybe frozen out into oblivion. Where's NEO these days I'm still plugged into the matrix. 😉

[@ehcmier]

Imagine a processor with 4800000^3 qubits. ;)

[@Redlioness-gp9ci]

Quantum computing, predictive algorithms based on amplitude of configurations. Its all black and white, and prejudiced in thegrey areas. Hope no psychos or power hungry narcissists are barred from all computing inputs. 😁

[@kaellum4260]

Quantum mechanics proves the world is non local. There needs to thus be two dimensions of time in our equations for a proper five dimensional reality. The fact that quantum mechanics explains this universe allows us to be in the local now from a non local origin. #PhilosophyOfTimeTravel on twitter by #3767 Nice chat and good interview Lex. I'll follow you on @twitter because of this. *aside; interesting your name means "law'

[@qqtrollin7423]

nerds

[@mTheoriexboxl]

[@ΜιχαήλΣάπκας]

A bad explanation, typical of a physicist that hasn't understood how math actually translate to the real world.

[@saikrishnaa4201]

Wow that is same in Hindu philosophy, like Atma , karma . I'm surprised.

[@asclepius4855]

Bigots

[@Hari2897]

First time I'm first lol

[@burkebaby]

vIt amazes me how the world has brilliant people like these two walking among cavemen like me.

[@ablatt89]

Interview Lubos Motl (string theorist( if you can and ask for his opinion of Scott Aaronson lol

[@ablatt89]

@@paulthomas963 Cope.