I’d like to ask a question. Penny mentioned the mother shouldn’t have had to get that paperwork to prove a DNR and they should have just taken her word right then and there. To me, that could be detrimental if the person giving the orders has malice intention and gives the opposite order than what the orders actual state. Does that happen a lot? Both ways can be detrimental, if the person actually has a DNR and gets stabilized, or if they don’t have a DNR and don’t get the help to be stabilized. I’m just trying to understand your stance on that one, or if I’m misunderstanding, or don’t have all the information. Thanks!