Seerah pt 78 - Pt.4 Conquest of Makkah (Those that were forgiven) - Yasir Qadhi - 2014-3-19

[@darakhshanfatima6900]

I have never heard such a detailed seerah Allah bless u here and after

[@AbdulMannan-yr8ef]

best seera of our prophet, thank shaykh yasir

[@abdihakimomar987]

Abdul Mannan t

[@MK55555.]

This one has made me cry soo much what an amazing pinnacle ....... May Allah reward you so much

[@niloferkabir72]

Extremely touchy and beautiful victory.All praise to Allah.Allah O Akbar

[@ashahussein5336]

This is my favourite part of the seera. Allah Akbar

[@sahraayeeyo2114]

May Allah reward him Ameen

[@Karachiottawa]

Amazingly described ,may Allahswt bless u ,,,,,

[@fmnishad1]

Jazakallah Dr.Yasser Qadhi and MIC.

[@akeelrafiq3504]

Most emotional victory!

[@samuelsmith577]

Thanks brother for the upload

[@forthepleasureofallah]

V well explained sir, jazākumullāh khayr

[@benjaminjohnson44]

Thought of another benefit of the Prophet (SAW) not killing Abdullah Ibn...Othman's foster brother. If orientalists jump on his fabrications after his riddah. The fact that he was not killed allowed him to re-accepted Islam genuinely and later become a person known for his faith. To any orientalist who quotes his earlier writings, we can simply point to his later life.

[@akhlakc00]

l seriously need longer seerah lectures can anyone ask sheikh yasir to make them 2 or 3 hours plz

[@niko88neko]

Jutaan terima kasih.

[@benjaminjohnson44]

Hi, I'm new to Islam and am rewatching the seerah, Does anyone know what the benefit was of allowing the conflict between the Khoza and banu Bakr to take place inside of the Haram as mentioned in the hadith? Also, is the incident associated with the revelation of any particular passage in the Koran? The only idea I can come up with is that it was allowed as an honor to the prophet (pbuh) as a way to re-establish the sanctity of Mecca. It would be impossible to capture Mecca without bloodshed and it is surprising that the city was captured with as little as it was. Still, I don't see why the prophet wouldn't decide to stage the revenge fight between the two tribes outside of the Haram boundaries... I don't know. Maybe it was a way of controlling the fight so that it didn't get too out of hand, or maybe it was just done as a way to say, shirk was brought into Mecca, blood was shed during the fight to reclaim it, now that it is, fighting is forbidden. I'd be interested if anyone knows more or has an opinion.

[@muhammadbustamam208]

Assalamulaikum Brother Benjamin. This is a good question and I presume this has to do with the lecture around 42:00 I don't have the answer and your reasoning seems to be good to me. Allah knows best. But I am also interested as well. Here is my reasoning, Since it is because of the incident between these two tribes is the very reason that the treaty was rendered void and allowed Rasullulah (SAW) to conquer Mecca, it is a direct cause of why Rasullulah (SAW) was able to take the Haram in the first place. However the Justice between these two tribes had not been established and so Rasullulah (SAW) allowed the fighting to occur temporarily so that they can have some sort of remediation for what was done. And Allah knows best.

[@ahfauq]

Benjamin, your question is genuine. If you pay close attention, you will realize that there are FAR MORE serious, eyebrow-raising questions in this and many other lectures from this “sheikh”. I urge you to study the Qur’an instead of listening to this sheikh.The Quran is consistent, it reflects the true “Mercy for mankind” and the “paragon of the highest morality” aspect the noble Prophet (pbuh)’s character.

[@Healthimprove]

Ud egg du g Duffy drugs goody he du du goody if guygg day Yhuc du u day get odoriferous Dudu d difficulty guided du Benjamin Johnson

[@emze563]

@@ahfauq only your eyebrows are raised

[@ahfauq]

@@emze563 Okay, let's test YOUR "eyebrows', brother Alshoha! Consider the following few of MANY “gems” I have found from this 'sheikh's videos: 1. This 'sheikh' tells us that the Sahabah loved, revered, and respected the Prophet (alyhissalam) so much that they would not let his wudu water droplets fall on the ground because they competed with each other doing that - and that they would smear Prophet’s spittle/gargles on their bodies for blessing! Really? The Prophet (alyhissalam) let them do that? Is this scenario even physically possible? Is it some kind of sport that the Companions used to play? Imagine yourself trying to your wudu and a bunch of people trying to not let the water drop to the floor! If this doesn’t raise your ‘eyebrows’, then let’s proceed further: 2. If that height of ‘reverence’ is factually true, then we have another HUGE problem with this “sheikh”’s teachings. Let me explain: On the occasion of the Hydaybiyyah Treaty proceedings, the Prophet (alyhissalam) ordered his Sahabah to shave their heads and sacrifice their animals. ALL OF THEM - and there were 1400 of them - refused to obey the Prophet!!! Talk about reverence and respect and love. Do you think this odd situation will not raise eyebrows? 3. The Taif chieftain Urwa bin Masood, was trying to express his personal opinion the Ansaar will most likely leave the Prophet (alyhissalam), simply because they were not of his own tribe (not Qureshis). He was not being rude but just expressing his concern about a possible future scenario. This should not have made any sane, civilized person angry. But our ‘sheikh’ says that Abu Bakr (r.a) became so angry that he used the most lewd, the vilest, and the smuttiest street language (I don’t want to even translate that kind of language) for Ibn Masood. And he had the audacity to utter really bad language right in the presence of the Prophet. If this does not raise eyebrow, then consider the alleged Ibn Masood’s response to Abu Bakr’s foul language using the most decent language. Urwa bin Masood did not pay Abu Bakr in the same coin but handled his (alleged) abuse very wisely, saying “I have just returned the favor I owed to you by keeping quiet in response to your language”. Please realize that, at that time, Urwa bin Masood was a pagan, not a Muslim. Should I believe that a pagan had much, much better moral standards compared to Abu Bakr??? 4. I could write on and on and on… but I really do not have the energy books… Brother, this is just the tip of the iceberg. I have a LOT more to say and point out, in case someone is prepared to listen. It is so easy to fool people and earn respect and popularity. But these ‘shuyukh” should fear Allan and shirk spreading falsehood in the name of pristine Islam. Unfortunately, This sheikh believes EVERTHING that he finds written anywhere in the huge pile of “the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” fabrications that make no sense to a sane and attentive person. Not everything he says is insulting to the blessed prophetic office, but then please present only those things that make sense and avoid the bad stuff (and there’s a lot of it hidden under the ‘rug’ of ancient books written by the authors who compiled their works based on “he said, she said” - that too after more than 150-220 years AFTER the Prophet (alyhissalam).

[@MagHauwry]

What happened to abu Souffiane's walking buddy when Abbas (ra) addressed him? because if he did not go with them to the prophet pbuh how did the Makkan's not find out that there was an amry of 10000 not to far from them? please some give an answer because it is kind of confusing. Salam

[@ayaanle29]

Jzk kheyran

[@mr.a7065]

in which episode does he talk more about wahshi in detail?

[@PaperGlazed]

Looks for the videos of the battle of Uhud.

[@wiraputra4101]

2018

[@drnaima1]

Overwhelming

[@mantaqianjam8488]

The more I know the more I discovered the hypocrisy and double standards

[@fmnishad1]

Jazakallah Dr.Yasser Qadhi and MIC.

[@ayaanle29]

Jzk kheyran